Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: POSIX include problem

2006-03-16 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > ... > > I found this while trying Thomas Gleixner's cyclic test over the POSIX > > skin (http://www.tglx.de/projects/misc/cyclictest). After fixing a > > rather ugly bug in his code (missing mlockall) I ran into a yet unknown > > issue with t

Re: [Xenomai-core] Synchronising TSC and periodic timer

2006-03-16 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > > Likely too simple: The periodic IRQ seems to pop up on every CPU so > that > > > > the TSC could be recorded, but will this happen synchronously? At > least > > > > we will see

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: POSIX include problem

2006-03-16 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > Hi Gilles, > > > > > > don't know yet what's going wrong, but the following demo code doesn't > > > compile against the POSIX skin due to unresolved SIG_BLOCK: > > > > > > #include > > > #include > > >

Re: [Xenomai-core] Synchronising TSC and periodic timer

2006-03-16 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > Likely too simple: The periodic IRQ seems to pop up on every CPU so that > > > the TSC could be recorded, but will this happen synchronously? At least > > > we will see (IRQ) jitters, and those jitters could already

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: POSIX include problem

2006-03-16 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Hi Gilles, > > > > don't know yet what's going wrong, but the following demo code doesn't > > compile against the POSIX skin due to unresolved SIG_BLOCK: > > > > #include > > #include > > > > int main() > > { > > return SIG

[Xenomai-core] Re: POSIX include problem

2006-03-16 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > don't know yet what's going wrong, but the following demo code doesn't > compile against the POSIX skin due to unresolved SIG_BLOCK: > > #include > #include > > int main() > { > return SIG_BLOCK; > } > > Comment out the pthread include,

[Xenomai-core] Re: POSIX include problem

2006-03-16 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > don't know yet what's going wrong, but the following demo code doesn't > compile against the POSIX skin due to unresolved SIG_BLOCK: > > #include > #include > > int main() > { > return SIG_BLOCK; > } > > Comment out the pthread include,

[Xenomai-core] VxWorks skin improvement

2006-03-16 Thread Philippe Gerum
I'm currently working on extending the VxWorks skin so that it is going to be callable from user-space directly, without needing the UVM environment. This will also make its functional extension easier in the future, especially with respect to bsp-related services. While I'm at it, I'd also

[Xenomai-core] POSIX include problem

2006-03-16 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Gilles, don't know yet what's going wrong, but the following demo code doesn't compile against the POSIX skin due to unresolved SIG_BLOCK: #include #include int main() { return SIG_BLOCK; } Comment out the pthread include, and it will work again. Any ideas? Jan signature.asc De