Question #700531 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700531
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Hi,
Using the position of the wall instead of the contact point is perfectly fine.
The sum of f*l really runs over all interacting pairs regardless of the shapes
of the objec
Question #700531 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700531
Jérôme Duriez posted a new comment:
If one goes back to the analytical derivations of this "Love-Weber"
formula, one should see contacts with boundary bodies should probably
not be included at all. Since boundary
Question #700531 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700531
Jan Stránský posted a new comment:
> the brach vector is calculated by the position of the two objects
currently the code is like that.
Therefore, it is not suitable for wall-sphere contact, where the branch sho
Question #700531 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700531
Leonard posted a new comment:
Hi Karol,
Thanks very much for your sharing.
As described in the code:
branch = b1->state->pos - b2->state->pos;
stressTensor += (nsi->normalForce + nsi->shearForce) * branch.trans
Question #700531 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700531
Status: Answered => Solved
Leonard confirmed that the question is solved:
Thanks Karol Brzezinski, that solved my question.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an ans
Question #700531 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700531
Status: Open => Answered
Karol Brzezinski proposed the following answer:
Hi,
You can find the code here [2]. Maybe this will help you to find the
answer.
I can't interpret this for sure, because of my litt
6 matches
Mail list logo
