Re: [zfs-discuss] Adding my own compression to zfs

2007-11-30 Thread roland
*bump* just wanted to keep this into discussion. i think it could be important to zfs if it could compress faster with a better compressratio. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

[zfs-discuss] Best stripe-size in array for ZFS mail storage?

2007-11-30 Thread Vincent Fox
We will be using Cyrus to store mail on 2540 arrays. We have chosen to build 5-disk RAID-5 LUNs in 2 arrays which are both connected to same host, and mirror and stripe the LUNs. So a ZFS RAID-10 set composed of 4 LUNs. Multi-pathing also in use for redundancy. My question is any guidance on

Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 w/ small random encrypted text files

2007-11-30 Thread Darren J Moffat
Joerg Schilling wrote: Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've personally (and professionally) been bitten by all 3 above scenarios - more than once! IMHO, SATA point-to-point serial links are far more reliable than anything I could build with SCSI technology. SCSI is (since SCSI-3)

Re: [zfs-discuss] Nice chassis for ZFS server

2007-11-30 Thread John Martinez
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:47 AM, MP wrote: I evaled one of these too. Worked great with ZFS. Was that with OpenSolaris and was that with or without the Intel RAID controller? Cheers. Solaris 10 8/07, it was with the built-in RAID controller. -john

Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 w/ small random encrypted text files

2007-11-30 Thread Kam
I'm using the thumper as a secondary storage device and therefor am technically only worried about capacity and performance. In regards to availability, if it fails I should be okay as long as I don't also lose the primary storage during the time it takes to recover the secondary [knock on

Re: [zfs-discuss] Nice chassis for ZFS server

2007-11-30 Thread MP
I evaled one of these too. Worked great with ZFS. Was that with OpenSolaris and was that with or without the Intel RAID controller? Cheers. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS write time performance question

2007-11-30 Thread William D. Hathaway
In addition to Brendan's advice about benchmarking, it would be a good idea to use the newer Solaris release (Solaris 10 08/07), which has a lot of ZFS improvements (performance and functional). This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 w/ small random encrypted text files

2007-11-30 Thread Ross
Aaah, that makes sense :) If it's just performance you're after for small writes, I wonder if you've considered putting the ZIL on an NVRAM card? It looks like this can give something like a 20x performance increase in some situations:

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best stripe-size in array for ZFS mail storage?

2007-11-30 Thread Louwtjie Burger
On Dec 1, 2007 7:15 AM, Vincent Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We will be using Cyrus to store mail on 2540 arrays. We have chosen to build 5-disk RAID-5 LUNs in 2 arrays which are both connected to same host, and mirror and stripe the LUNs. So a ZFS RAID-10 set composed of 4 LUNs.