Re: [zfs-discuss] can i make a COMSTAR zvol bigger?

2010-01-20 Thread Errol Neal
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 02:38 PM, Thomas Burgess wrote: > I finally got iscsi working, and it's amazing...it took a minute for me to > figure out...i didn't realize it required 2 toolsbut anwyays. > > my original zvol is too smalli created a 120 gb zvol for time machine > but i really n

Re: [zfs-discuss] "NearLine SAS"?

2010-01-19 Thread Errol Neal
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 01:36 PM, "A. Krijgsman" wrote: > Yes, those i meant! (interposer cards, could get on that name!) > The Dell's and HP's would al work in any enviroment? > > It's just plain converting between industry standards right? > > Or do people have a better solution to share a sing

Re: [zfs-discuss] "NearLine SAS"?

2010-01-19 Thread Errol Neal
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 01:02 PM, "A. Krijgsman" wrote: > I was today reasearching this same phenomenon. > The multipath is required for HA storage solutions with redundant i/o path > backplanes and redundant controllers. > ( If a controller fails, the other one can still access the harddisk.) > >

[zfs-discuss] Upgrading from snv_121 to snv_129+

2009-12-27 Thread Errol Neal
I'm looking at upgrading a box serving a lun via iSCSI (Comstar) currently running snv_121. The initiators are cluster pair running SLES11. Any gotchas that I should be aware of? Sys Specs are: 2 Xeon E5410 procs 8 GB RAM 12 10K Savios 1 X25-E as ZIL Supermicro rebranded LSI SAS controller Th