Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-17 Thread John W. Redelfs
George Cobabe favored us with: The problem is that the doctrine of the trinity is so convoluted we cannot if discuss it without being subject to the same requirements of confusion and misunderstanding. Not much simpler is it? I think I got it the second time around. Still, conceptually it is a

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-17 Thread George Cobabe
al Message - From: "John W. Redelfs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:21 PM Subject: Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin > George Cobabe favored us with: > >Marc - would it be true to say that we LDS beli

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-16 Thread John W. Redelfs
George Cobabe favored us with: Marc - would it be true to say that we LDS believe in a universal definition of Godhood, and what is entailed in that high station, and see infinite manifestations of that universal concept? What is "God" is a universal constant that many, many are exalted to confor

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-16 Thread Marc A. Schindler
Jon Spencer wrote: > I watched a very learned Lutheran schoolar explain this entire subject (the > Trinity) on TV once, and I felt inclined to write to the school that gave > him his doctor of divinity degree and advise them to retract it. > > It was pure, illogical gibberish, with many hidden (

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-16 Thread George Cobabe
MAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:32 PM Subject: Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin The problem is there's a trap for the innocent here. I know what you mean, and would agree with it. The problem is that Platonists would ascribe an *independent* existence to a character

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-16 Thread Marc A. Schindler
The problem is there's a trap for the innocent here. I know what you mean, and would agree with it. The problem is that Platonists would ascribe an *independent* existence to a characteristic. Kind of like turning an adjective into a noun. So "God" became an abstract and separate existence "an und

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-16 Thread George Cobabe
rue - then does the false notion of trinitarianism have a basis in truth, but then it is corrupted in its application? George - Original Message - From: "Marc A. Schindler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>e Monday, December 16, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [ZION]

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-16 Thread Marc A. Schindler
I'll give it a try (but of course keep in mind that I'm not defending it, just trying to explain it from a creedal Christian point of view). There are a number of variations of trinitarianism, but I'll stick with the basic one set up at the Council of Chalcedon. The creedal statement basically rea

RE: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-13 Thread Chet
Stacy Smith wrote: > The way I understood the entire thing is that it would be like splitting > > water into its various forms but with each being capable of reacting > separately, something water can't do. > > Stacy. So basic'ly, we're back at the malfunctioning transporter again. (See the

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-13 Thread Stacy Smith
I'd like to find an electronically scanned text copy if possible. Stacy. At 10:58 AM 12/13/2002 -0500, you wrote: I watched a very learned Lutheran schoolar explain this entire subject (the Trinity) on TV once, and I felt inclined to write to the school that gave him his doctor of divinity degr

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-13 Thread Jon Spencer
Was that a pun? If so, then you should capitalize Mass! Jon Till the confusing wrote: > At 10:58 12/13/2002 -0500, St Jon wrote: > >I watched a very learned Lutheran schoolar explain this entire subject (the > >Trinity) on TV once, and I felt inclined to write to the school that gave > >him his

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-13 Thread Elmer L. Fairbank
At 10:58 12/13/2002 -0500, St Jon wrote: I watched a very learned Lutheran schoolar explain this entire subject (the Trinity) on TV once, and I felt inclined to write to the school that gave him his doctor of divinity degree and advise them to retract it. It was pure, illogical gibberish, with ma

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-13 Thread Jon Spencer
I watched a very learned Lutheran schoolar explain this entire subject (the Trinity) on TV once, and I felt inclined to write to the school that gave him his doctor of divinity degree and advise them to retract it. It was pure, illogical gibberish, with many hidden (and unproven) assumptions. As

RE: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-12 Thread Stacy Smith
The way I understood the entire thing is that it would be like splitting water into its various forms but with each being capable of reacting separately, something water can't do. Stacy. At 03:46 PM 12/12/2002 +, you wrote: Stacy Smith wrote: > I think that as a former Protestant I unders

RE: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-12 Thread Chet
Stacy Smith wrote: > I think that as a former Protestant I understood much about trinitarian > theology and understood what it meant. I had very few vague ideas about > > the subject. Could you explain it to me, then? In all my years in Southern Baptist, and in all my wife's years in vario

RE: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-12 Thread Stacy Smith
I think that as a former Protestant I understood much about trinitarian theology and understood what it meant. I had very few vague ideas about the subject. I was a much better Bible student than many of my fellow members. I can't say as much for the Book of Mormon but I am getting to know i

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-10 Thread Paul Osborne
Gary Smith favored us with: >If progression between kingdoms ends up being a possibility, perhaps it >becomes an incentive for those who desire to grow to eventually become >celestialized. I dunno. I think that it may be possible, just that it >would take them "worlds without end" (DC 131) to achie

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-10 Thread Jon Spencer
John W. Redelfs wrote: > > I'm with Elder McConkie, progression between kingdoms is heresy. It > violates the true principle that mercy cannot rob justice. THIS life is > the time to prepare to meet God. After this life no labor can be > performed. It says so in the Book of Mormon, so it must b

Re: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-10 Thread John W. Redelfs
Gary Smith favored us with: If progression between kingdoms ends up being a possibility, perhaps it becomes an incentive for those who desire to grow to eventually become celestialized. I dunno. I think that it may be possible, just that it would take them "worlds without end" (DC 131) to achieve

RE: [ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-09 Thread Chet
Gary Smith wrote: > Most people don't understand well the doctrines of their church. That > includes LDS members, though the active ones probably understand our > basic tenets better than those of other churches. Most Trinitarians do > not understand the Trinity well (most believe in modalism, a f

[ZION] "heck" ain't cussin

2002-12-08 Thread Gary Smith
Most people don't understand well the doctrines of their church. That includes LDS members, though the active ones probably understand our basic tenets better than those of other churches. Most Trinitarians do not understand the Trinity well (most believe in modalism, a few even believe in the Godh