On Monday 26 April 2010, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Could someone give me and Hanno pypi access to zope.browserresource and
> zope.browsermenu?
I am in the process to give you access to all the packages that I am an owner
of (now that PyPI is fixed again. :-)
Let me know if hannosch wants the sam
On Monday 26 April 2010, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Could someone give me and Hanno pypi access to zope.browserresource and
> zope.browsermenu?
Done.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
___
Zope-Dev maill
Hi there,
Could someone give me and Hanno pypi access to zope.browserresource and
zope.browsermenu?
Our pypi usernames are:
faassen
hannosch
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-de
Tres Seaver a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
>
>> Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 32bit
>> From: ccomb at free.fr
>> Date: Sun Apr 25 23:13:57 EDT 2010
>> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-April/014124.
On Saturday 24 April 2010, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> * Use an other JSON converter (simplejson?)
Definitely switch to simplejson.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
> Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 32bit
> From: ccomb at free.fr
> Date: Sun Apr 25 23:13:57 EDT 2010
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-April/014124.html
>
> Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0d
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Apr 25 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Apr 26 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 16 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 9 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct
at gocept.com.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 670
Hi there,
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
>> Interesting, and thanks for doing this. Concerning Grok, did you look at
>> Grok 1.0 or Grok 1.1?
>
> Just grok/trunk (I was trying to think about the "state of ZTK" in terms
> of how it was being used by latest-and-greatest versions of
