Hi there, Tres Seaver wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: > >> Interesting, and thanks for doing this. Concerning Grok, did you look at >> Grok 1.0 or Grok 1.1? > > Just grok/trunk (I was trying to think about the "state of ZTK" in terms > of how it was being used by latest-and-greatest versions of downstream > projects).
Okay, that should be approximately 1.1. > and the following further packages say that they are marked as unused, > according to the dependency checker: > > - - zope.app.appsetup This is definitely being used. I figure it's a dependency through ZCML. >> Of course we'll also need the other zope.app.* packages for a while >> longer to provide backward compatibility imports and such for those >> upgrading existing Grok apps. > > I'm assuming that BBB imports could be "soft" dependencies, and that > developers who are upgrading from earlier Grok versions can adjust their > own buildouts or package depenencies to pull the extras in without Grok > needing to provide "convenience dependencies" -- am I right? Yes. We'll likely have a grok-backwards package or something like that that depends on the "lost" dependencies, so a developer can depend on that with their project. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )