On 1/24/06, Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got one on zope2.6.4 that's about ~30GB, it's running fine, except
> that
> a) It takes ages for zope to start (~15 minutes)
> b) I have to mount an extra NFS volume in order to "pack" the DB
Are you using DirectoryStorage ?
Thanks,
Baiju M
David Johnson wrote:
> So what is the largest ZODB (in terms of persistent objects contained in
> it)? Does anyone have any metrics?
I've got one on zope2.6.4 that's about ~30GB, it's running fine, except
that
a) It takes ages for zope to start (~15 minutes)
b) I have to mount an extra NFS volume
Subject: Re: [Zope3-Users] Re:
Zope 3 Capacities
It probably won't meet
their needs either, but the latest version of DirectoryStorage is supposed to
be compatible with Zope3.
It might mitigate the startup time and index memory consumption issues
somewhat, especially if they can use rei
It probably won't meet their needs either, but the latest version of DirectoryStorage is supposed to be compatible with Zope3.It might mitigate the startup time and index memory consumption issues somewhat, especially if they can use reiserfs.
http://dirstorage.sourceforge.net/MattOn 1/22/06, Jeff
On Sunday 22 January 2006 11:44, David Johnson wrote:
> So if one wants to replace ZODB with something like MySQL where would one
> look?
You cannot just replace it. But you can store most of your data using sqlos.
That's probably what you want.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics &
Rush'
> Subject: Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Zope 3 Capacities
>
> On Sunday 22 January 2006 11:11, David Johnson wrote:
> > I think we will probably proceed on trying to make a MySQL adapter that
> can
> > replace GadFly -- hopefully possible and not TOO much work. I think
&
On Sunday 22 January 2006 11:11, David Johnson wrote:
> I think we will probably proceed on trying to make a MySQL adapter that can
> replace GadFly -- hopefully possible and not TOO much work. I think that
> and a better SQL container (maybe sqlos) would solve our issues, as well as
> be a great
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Jim Fulton
> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 10:06 AM
> To: Jeff Rush
> Cc: zope3-users@zope.org
> Subject: Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Zope 3 Capacities
>
> Jeff Rush wrote:
> ...
> > I've always wondered why Z
Jeff Rush wrote:
...
I've always wondered why ZODB didn't offer an option of storing the
object index in a BTREE, but I guess its the performance issue of
potential additional disk accesses.
This was one of the benefits of the Berkeley DB storage. Sadly,
we put a lot of work into the BDB stor
David Johnson wrote:
In general we’re looking at using an RDBMS, but we’re trying to
> get a better feeling of when we can use the ZODB and when we
> should stick to the RDBMS.
We have various datasets:
1. Transactions: 10-100 billion objects
2. Users: 10-100 million objects
3. Cont
10 matches
Mail list logo
