Re: (313) britist murder boys
Thanks for the link, here's another performance by them: http://www.littledetroit.net/Mixes/BritishMurderBoys-LiveatS.php /0 wrote: British Murder Boys - April 2005 3 hour live set recorded on 1st April 2005 http://downloads.clubdogma.com/mp3/BMBDogmaApril05.mp3 245 Mb, 3 hours
Re: (313) britist murder boys
oops, sorry about the broken link. I can give people a link to my ftp site if they really want it. Shoot me an email if interested. Matt Kane's Brain wrote: Looks like a 404 on the download link there :( On Apr 16, 2005, at 10:26, Andrew Hegler wrote: Thanks for the link, here's another performance by them: http://www.littledetroit.net/Mixes/BritishMurderBoys-LiveatS.php /0 wrote: British Murder Boys - April 2005 3 hour live set recorded on 1st April 2005 http://downloads.clubdogma.com/mp3/BMBDogmaApril05.mp3 245 Mb, 3 hours -- matt kane's brain http://hydrogenproject.com aim - mkbatwerk || mkbwriu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(313) new mix online (sorry if this is a repost)
Posted this about a week ago or so, but I never saw the posting myself. Could have not gone through because I put some html in the body of the message. Anyway, a new mix of mine is online at www.detroittechnomilitia.com. The new mix is titled tabA-slotB. It has a bit of everything in it. No tracklisting is on the site yet, but I can provide it to anyone interested. Hope some of you enjoy it. Again, sorry if this is a repost.
Re: (313) shake mix
Am I the only one having problems listening to any mixes on d-i-r-t-y.com? I've never been able to stream mixes off of this site. I've got realplayer 10. I've tried through firefox and ie. I can listen to real audio streams at other sites, so I don't think it's a configuration problem...I've been trying to listen to mixes off of this site forever! Thomas van Steen. wrote: Yes ... a very good mix recorded live at Paradise Massage (Paris / Rex Club)! juste a Track ID Somebody know the track near 57:00 bass? old track... Tom Van Steen. http://.pulsation.com lee herrington wrote: Don't know if this has been posted before, but there's a great shake mix at this site. http://www.d-i-r-t-y.com/index2.html?first=http://www.d-i-r-t-y.com/dirty_di amonds/ cheers, lee r. herrington u store it technical support specialist 440-260-2245
Re: (313) Sean Deason - Tsunami mix tracklisting?
haha it's pretty sad when you need a tracklisting for something you own! Thanks for the info though! M : A : T : R : I : X wrote: that would be Josh Wink 516 Acid :^) sean p.s. I'll post a track listing for this mix soon for those interested in that sort of thing. on 2/14/05 7:56 PM, Andrew James Hegler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered these words: I know Sean is an active member on the list, and was wondering if he, or any of the other members happen to have a track listing of this mix. This is an excellent mix, and I had the unfortunate pleasure of djing in the other room while he was performing at this party. I wish I could have heard this at the party. Really glad that it got recorded. There are a ton of great songs in this mix. One specific track that I've been hearing a lot of, and can't quite put my finger on is a minimal acid record with a very very deep voice saying acid in it. Thanks -Andy
(313) Friday April 23rd - Foran's Detroit
For those interested, T. Linder, Darkcube, and I will be djing down at Foran's Irish Pub on friday (tomorrow). They want booty music all night, so I'll be dropping detroit classics and electro pitched up super fast, since I don't own a whole lot of booty. It's bound to be a great time though. You can check the flyer out at http://313underground.com Can't say I know that much about the other details listed on the flyer, but hey, if it brings out some ladies, I won't complain! Hope some of you can make it down to listen to some good music played at a faster than usual tempo. I'll bring some of my mixes down too, so if anyone wants a copy, feel free to ask. -Andy
(313) track ID and shameless self promotion all rolled into one
First the importoant: I recently downloaded a luke vibert mix titled : Luke Vibert and Deadly Avenger - Live at radio one's One World. There are a ton of great songs played in this mix, so I'll start with the beginning, what's the very first track played in the mix, before Luke starts doing his voice over? To me it sounds like a great combination of detroit techno and hip house. Second, I've put out a new mix, it's about a month old by now, but if anyone is interested in a copy, let me know. I don't have anywhere to host it currently, so it'd either have to be personally ftp'ed or mailed, or something of that nature. It's a bit of everything, from techno, to house, to experimental, to acid. -Andy
Re: (313) final scratch
I use strictly vinyl when I dj, but I can't say that I won't purchase a final scratch set up in the future. The convenience of carrying a lighter bag is my main reasoning for it, especially since when I play out, I always bring close to 100 records. Plus you don't have the risk of scratching the rare records that you dropped some coin on. Also, look at all of the edits that Surgeon does on tracks that he plays that he never presses, it gets too costly if you want to press every single remix you create. As far as the purity of music take on this and everything - I don't believe any of that. If you're trying to listen to something as close to the original recording as possible, then you wouldn't play it out at +/- x%. That takes the music out of key. It's still mathematically correct in that the frequency between the steps on that scale are the same, but the scale is shifted up or or down, thus not making it truly A minor, or whatever key it was originally played in; it would become A minor +26Hz, or whatever the math would come out to be depending on the percent change of the pitch shift. Also, a lot of music is being recorded as strictly digital these days, studios exist without a single reel of analog tape. Recording to a laptop and seeing the drawn out waveform does not make the file analog, since hard drives are written to digitally, the .wav file is still a digitally sampled waveform. So if it is originally a digital recording, why convert it to analog, there's no gain in sound quality, you can't add depth to a sound after it's already created. Besides, isn't the art of djing, more based on adding your own twist on other people's music? If that includes doing reworks, and edits of a track using digital software, and digital waveform editors, then so be it, that's at the remixer's discretion. Finally, I'd say that even the biggest audiophiles would have quite a challenge ahead of them in deciphering the difference between a piece of vinyl, and a properly encoded record using lame at a reasonable sample rate and bit depth when it's played over a loud, noisy, and often boomy club system. Not trying to argue on the matter at all, just trying to voice my opinion on the whole digital dj realm. I used to be so ridiculously anti-final scratch, that I got into an argument with Richie Hawtin about it. He made very valid points, but I was so passionate about my stance on the matter, that I failed to really take them into account at the time. I just think that it's inevitable that djing is going to go digital, whether it be for better or for worse. -Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has me thinking about what music means to people today - seems to be more of a commodity than a communication between two or more living beings All the digital formats remove parts of the sound spectrum and change the sound of the music - some may say it's crisper but the human ear isn't designed for it I would propose that we don't react the same way, on a physical level, to digital vs analogue sound. Our ears are designed by nature to take in all of the sound in the environment - ambient and active. What I don't understand is why people want to have less compression on their formats but still think that digital is the wave of the future. If you want less compression then just use analogue sound sources. That to me is saying that analogue is the best because it's the closest recording to actually being there but we're going to cut out more of the spectrum because it's the way forward. Digital is convenient for producing music but it's no where near analogue for reproduction. It never will be. Why are we allowing ourselves to be led by the Pied Piper of the established music industry toward more music as commodity? MEK robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 'Martin' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctric.com313@hyperreal.org cc: 02/10/04 07:34 AMSubject: RE: (313) final scratch - Single sales are now the lowest they have ever been, in fact - I was in a - studio last week and the first thing they knocked out wasn't - a rough
Re: (313) new dbx
Squirrel Bait is hot! I dig all three tracks on it. Very quirky techno, but I also agree that it needs to be heard loudly. I often annoy my parents by shaking the basement with it. The stereo phasing really adds depth to the tracks. Mark S. Krüx wrote: Yeap that's the one they're all on about The b-side has two unreleased mid nineties DBX tracks. Squirrel Bait is one of my top 10 favorites from last year...guess some people don't get it though:-/ - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'jonathan morse' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@Hyperreal.ORG Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:24 PM Subject: RE: (313) new dbx can someone plesaase claify what new DBX your talking about (since some of us don't go to the record shop 3 times a week) If you're talking about Squirrelbait- which to my knowledge is the most recent DBX release- than it needs to be heard on a big system to be understood. I didn';t like it on the villallobos mix cd, but was rocked when john tejada played it live. and if there's another newer DBx- it'd be nice to know the name of it. thanks On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, robin wrote: - ok, at the risk of coming across as jaded...granted these - are only 30 sec RA - clips and not on a home/club system or pitched up/down but - having been - around for the DBX classics I'd rather listen to those and - reminisce then - revisit the sound/style ten years later. not that these - aren't good tracks - or anything but I much rather spend my money on recent dan - bell remixes - than recent DBX rehashes. - - anyone else feel this way or is it just me? i think i'm with ya there actually. this seems like heresy but i think dan's newer stuff doesn't really light my fire in the same way that the old dbx material did. that isn't to say i don't pick it up but now i make sure i listen to it first, whereas i used to just buy his material on sight. is it possible that the use of certain equipment (ok, i'm talkin rz1) gave dbx such a distinctive style that it's kinda hard to move on from that without people moaning like i'm doing now? robin...
(313) test
test
