RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread David Powers
Wow you just discovered an incredible new way to market classical music!!!


dave  

MEK wrote:

that's the stupid thing about revivals - it's very contrived, like the
recent electro revival of the last several years. Why the fashion and
focus on those years? To be into the music, why do people feel that they
have to dress up in the fashion of the era it was created in? Imagine if
classical music fans did this - wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and
placing fake birthmarks over their lips. We'd all think it was a bit much
no?

MEK






RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread The REAL Mxyzptlk



 wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and
placing fake birthmarks over their lips.


I was doing this WAY before it was cool.

jeff




RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight

It's the new punk. Anyone have Malcolm McLaren's number?

MEK



   
  David Powers
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
  lnoize.com  cc:   313@hyperreal.org  
   
   Subject:  RE: (313) and now - a 
cheeky question (2nd
  06/16/03 10:25 AM re-post)
   

   

   




Wow you just discovered an incredible new way to market classical music!!!


dave

MEK wrote:

that's the stupid thing about revivals - it's very contrived, like the
recent electro revival of the last several years. Why the fashion and
focus on those years? To be into the music, why do people feel that they
have to dress up in the fashion of the era it was created in? Imagine if
classical music fans did this - wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and
placing fake birthmarks over their lips. We'd all think it was a bit much
no?

MEK











RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread The REAL Mxyzptlk

wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and
placing fake birthmarks over their lips.

At 10:36 AM 6/16/2003, you wrote:


It's the new punk. Anyone have Malcolm McLaren's number?







Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-)

jeff




RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight

Ah but I'm putting a twist on it-

i'm call this Nü Romantiks

MEK




  The REAL Mxyzptlk 

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   313@hyperreal.org 

  omcast.net   cc: 

Subject:  RE: (313) and now - a 
cheeky question (2nd
  06/16/03 12:04 PM  re-post)   









wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and
placing fake birthmarks over their lips.

At 10:36 AM 6/16/2003, you wrote:

It's the new punk. Anyone have Malcolm McLaren's number?






Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-)

 jeff









Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Fabrizio Nahum
FASCIST



 Ah but I'm putting a twist on it-

 i'm call this Nü Romantiks

 MEK



   The REAL Mxyzptlk
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
313@hyperreal.org
   omcast.net   cc:
 Subject:  RE: (313) and
now - a cheeky question (2nd
   06/16/03 12:04 PM  re-post)






 wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and
 placing fake birthmarks over their lips.
 
 At 10:36 AM 6/16/2003, you wrote:

 It's the new punk. Anyone have Malcolm McLaren's number?

 




 Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-)

  jeff











Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Ian
On 6/16/03 1:04 PM, The REAL Mxyzptlk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-)

Let's not dis the New Romantics, now.  How else would we have gotten
Frequency 7?

Back on topic,
-- 
im



Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread The REAL Mxyzptlk




 Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-)

Let's not dis the New Romantics, now.  How else would we have gotten
Frequency 7?


Or Atom and the Ants :-)

jeff (Dirk isn't the only one 
wearing white sox)





Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight

I think you're confusing Adam and the Ants with Atom Ant.
Atom Ant was a kids cartoon

come to think of it so was Adam and the Ants ;)

MEK





  The REAL Mxyzptlk 

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   Ian [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] 
  omcast.net   cc:   313@hyperreal.org 

Subject:  Re: (313) and now - a 
cheeky question (2nd re-post)   
  06/16/03 12:52 PM 











  Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-)

Let's not dis the New Romantics, now.  How else would we have gotten
Frequency 7?

Or Atom and the Ants :-)

 jeff (Dirk isn't the only one
wearing white sox)









RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-14 Thread spacecrusher
I think the big irritating thing about the electro revival is that the 
fashion oriented way people get all concerned about it being a trend in the 
first place.  

let me put it this way-there isn't anything stopping the producers, djs, and 
would be fans of Acid house to go make some acid house records and mixes and 
parties pretty much whenever.  why for a revival to happen this year or next 
year or any year?  go do it!

look, I realize I'm a bit of a DJ Smorgasbord, so maybe this won't impress 
anyone, but I found a really old Acid house record that I was mixing in with my 
electroclash mix JUST BECAUSE IT SOUNDED GOOD.  peep it at about 31-34 
minutes in-
http://www.bfamilyrecords.com/mixes/meta/extralongshortbusmix.ram

you know, acid is just the sound of a 303- a tool for writing music.  why does 
there have to be all this codified fashion crap.  whats the big deal if someone 
where to make an electro track with an acid bassline?  oh the horror!  

p.s. the new Osbourn track Shift in Ghostly/Spectral's State of the Union EP 
is the phattest retro acid/jackin' track I've heard in forever when the 
acid kicks in at the break... h


-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Fri, 13 Jun 2003 18:08:24 -0400 (EDT)

who's to say that the acid house revival has to be the UK version?



On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, rob wrote:


 The big Issue here is are we in a true state of an Acid House Revival.
 I don't think so and I don't think we've ever seen one!! I love all of the
 early 80's work i.e. Detroit Techno, Chicago House, New York Garage, Acid
 and all the other one offs that made up the UK Acid House Scene. That is all
 I've loved and I don't listen to anything else if I'm honest, cause I don't
 feel it! I live very close to London have been to Back to 89 parties and
 have been to where Placid plays real Old Acid Sets. but it is very rare
 that a club plays old Acid House sets. I also know that in Leeds a small
 club opened and closed quite quickly cause of poor turn outs for old Acid.
 Revival means reawakening and there is NO WAY that this beast has opened
 it's eyes yet!!

 The other point is just because I/anyone else choose to play Acid House
 because I love it does not mean that I'm trying to start a revival. I just
 want to let it be heard to a new generation... if 1000's of them think is
 the best thing that they have ever heard and start wearing bright coloured
 hooded tops and pom pom hats, dungarees and timberland and shouting
 Accciiieeedd!!! at the tops of there voice, and carry it on for a year or
 two, then maybe. maybe, that's when Acid House will be awake once more!
 Until then I think it's just being tickled.

   - Original Message -
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
unfortunately- i doubt acid will get huge in the way electro has. but,
 i
do recall hearing about someone in nyc trying to start a night called
hacienda (i think it failed)
 
  Or perhaps fortunately... Treasure the magic and the mystery...
 

 I do hate revivals (sorry) -- it's just because I live in a *constant*
 state of finding out about music that has been around for ages, and
 should be celebrated. As a society we are sick with nostalgia, and while
 it might be good in terms of celebrating artists who genuinely deserve
 it, I just think revivals are a bit lame.

 I read a great quote from Mad Mike a few years ago, someone asked him
 about the electro revival, (now, which one? See?) and he said 'Electro
 never went away.' I thought 'Too f*ckin right mate.'

 Anyway, just my opinion!


 Cheers,

 Andrew

 (PS. Is there a swear filter on 313? The last two tries at this didn't
 work... I know there's been problems lately tho. Maybe the admins need
 to look at their mailserver?)






Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service!
Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/


Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Andrew Hodgson
Matt Hellige wrote:
 
 [Fabrizio Nahum [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  i guess we agree on this :)
 
  i cant wait for the early-to-midnineties-uk-melodictechno-revival! i think
  it will be a little hard to market though ;)
 
 
 And I can't wait for the Kanzleramt: the early years revival!
 Revival fever!
 
  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   unfortunately- i doubt acid will get huge in the way electro has. but, i
   do recall hearing about someone in nyc trying to start a night called
   hacienda (i think it failed)
 
 Or perhaps fortunately... Treasure the magic and the mystery...
 

I do hate revivals (sorry) -- it's just because I live in a *constant*
state of finding out about music that has been around for ages, and
should be celebrated. As a society we are sick with nostalgia, and while
it might be good in terms of celebrating artists who genuinely deserve
it, I just think revivals are a bit lame.

I read a great quote from Mad Mike a few years ago, someone asked him
about the electro revival, (now, which one? See?) and he said 'Electro
never went away.' I thought 'Too f*ckin right mate.'

Anyway, just my opinion! 


Cheers,

Andrew

(PS. Is there a swear filter on 313? The last two tries at this didn't
work... I know there's been problems lately tho. Maybe the admins need
to look at their mailserver?)


RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread rob

The big Issue here is are we in a true state of an Acid House Revival.
I don't think so and I don't think we've ever seen one!! I love all of the
early 80's work i.e. Detroit Techno, Chicago House, New York Garage, Acid
and all the other one offs that made up the UK Acid House Scene. That is all
I've loved and I don't listen to anything else if I'm honest, cause I don't
feel it! I live very close to London have been to Back to 89 parties and
have been to where Placid plays real Old Acid Sets. but it is very rare
that a club plays old Acid House sets. I also know that in Leeds a small
club opened and closed quite quickly cause of poor turn outs for old Acid.
Revival means reawakening and there is NO WAY that this beast has opened
it's eyes yet!!

The other point is just because I/anyone else choose to play Acid House
because I love it does not mean that I'm trying to start a revival. I just
want to let it be heard to a new generation... if 1000's of them think is
the best thing that they have ever heard and start wearing bright coloured
hooded tops and pom pom hats, dungarees and timberland and shouting
Accciiieeedd!!! at the tops of there voice, and carry it on for a year or
two, then maybe. maybe, that's when Acid House will be awake once more!
Until then I think it's just being tickled.

  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   unfortunately- i doubt acid will get huge in the way electro has. but,
i
   do recall hearing about someone in nyc trying to start a night called
   hacienda (i think it failed)

 Or perhaps fortunately... Treasure the magic and the mystery...


I do hate revivals (sorry) -- it's just because I live in a *constant*
state of finding out about music that has been around for ages, and
should be celebrated. As a society we are sick with nostalgia, and while
it might be good in terms of celebrating artists who genuinely deserve
it, I just think revivals are a bit lame.

I read a great quote from Mad Mike a few years ago, someone asked him
about the electro revival, (now, which one? See?) and he said 'Electro
never went away.' I thought 'Too f*ckin right mate.'

Anyway, just my opinion!


Cheers,

Andrew

(PS. Is there a swear filter on 313? The last two tries at this didn't
work... I know there's been problems lately tho. Maybe the admins need
to look at their mailserver?)



Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Andrew Hodgson
That's cool, I guess what I meant was I love HEARING acid house music,
but I hate 'official' revivals that the press/style arses get hold of
and abuse. I love the old school nights as well, but to be honest I'd
hate it if loads of kids started wearing the old kind of dress, I just
think 'get a new thing going, you lazy bastards!'. That's not slating
anyone either! ;) It's all love.

Andrew


rob wrote:
 
 The big Issue here is are we in a true state of an Acid House Revival.
 I don't think so and I don't think we've ever seen one!! I love all of the
 early 80's work i.e. Detroit Techno, Chicago House, New York Garage, Acid
 and all the other one offs that made up the UK Acid House Scene. That is all
 I've loved and I don't listen to anything else if I'm honest, cause I don't
 feel it! I live very close to London have been to Back to 89 parties and
 have been to where Placid plays real Old Acid Sets. but it is very rare
 that a club plays old Acid House sets. I also know that in Leeds a small
 club opened and closed quite quickly cause of poor turn outs for old Acid.
 Revival means reawakening and there is NO WAY that this beast has opened
 it's eyes yet!!
 
 The other point is just because I/anyone else choose to play Acid House
 because I love it does not mean that I'm trying to start a revival. I just
 want to let it be heard to a new generation... if 1000's of them think is
 the best thing that they have ever heard and start wearing bright coloured
 hooded tops and pom pom hats, dungarees and timberland and shouting
 Accciiieeedd!!! at the tops of there voice, and carry it on for a year or
 two, then maybe. maybe, that's when Acid House will be awake once more!
 Until then I think it's just being tickled.
 
   - Original Message -
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
unfortunately- i doubt acid will get huge in the way electro has. but,
 i
do recall hearing about someone in nyc trying to start a night called
hacienda (i think it failed)
 
  Or perhaps fortunately... Treasure the magic and the mystery...
 
 
 I do hate revivals (sorry) -- it's just because I live in a *constant*
 state of finding out about music that has been around for ages, and
 should be celebrated. As a society we are sick with nostalgia, and while
 it might be good in terms of celebrating artists who genuinely deserve
 it, I just think revivals are a bit lame.
 
 I read a great quote from Mad Mike a few years ago, someone asked him
 about the electro revival, (now, which one? See?) and he said 'Electro
 never went away.' I thought 'Too f*ckin right mate.'
 
 Anyway, just my opinion!
 
 Cheers,
 
 Andrew
 
 (PS. Is there a swear filter on 313? The last two tries at this didn't
 work... I know there's been problems lately tho. Maybe the admins need
 to look at their mailserver?)


RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight

if 1000's of them think is the best thing that they have ever heard and
start wearing bright coloured
hooded tops and pom pom hats, dungarees and timberland and shouting
Accciiieeedd!!! at the tops of there voice, and carry it on for a year
or
two, then maybe. maybe, that's when Acid House will be awake once
more!


that's the stupid thing about revivals - it's very contrived, like the
recent electro revival of the last several years. Why the fashion and
focus on those years? To be into the music, why do people feel that they
have to dress up in the fashion of the era it was created in? Imagine if
classical music fans did this - wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and
placing fake birthmarks over their lips. We'd all think it was a bit much
no?

MEK




RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Peter Leidy

 that's the stupid thing about revivals - it's very contrived, like the
 recent electro revival of the last several years. Why the fashion and
 focus on those years? To be into the music, why do people feel that they
 have to dress up in the fashion of the era it was created in?

While revivals get caught up in nostalgia, fashion, etc.. I think the
electroclash/new wave revival is in a class of it's own in this regard.
Because much of the synth-punk/new-wave scene of the 80's and of today
is/was about the insignificance of music (and of everything). fashion
becomes sort of a punck-rock statement, and is in many ways as important
as the music itself .. at least in theory .. i never gave a crap about
anything besides the music, but that's why i'm a music geek instead of a
scenester...

I think something like acid house isn't as much entwined with any visual
aesthetics or fashion (at least in the US scene, maybe different for the
UK scene)- it was more about dancing than anything else.. and if an acid
house revival means all the lame-asses around here will start dancing
again, then bring it on :)!



Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Matt Hellige
[Peter Leidy [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 and if an acid house revival means all the lame-asses around here
 will start dancing again, then bring it on :)!

AMEN.




-- 
Matt Hellige  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://matt.immute.net


RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread yussel
who's to say that the acid house revival has to be the UK version?



On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, rob wrote:


 The big Issue here is are we in a true state of an Acid House Revival.
 I don't think so and I don't think we've ever seen one!! I love all of the
 early 80's work i.e. Detroit Techno, Chicago House, New York Garage, Acid
 and all the other one offs that made up the UK Acid House Scene. That is all
 I've loved and I don't listen to anything else if I'm honest, cause I don't
 feel it! I live very close to London have been to Back to 89 parties and
 have been to where Placid plays real Old Acid Sets. but it is very rare
 that a club plays old Acid House sets. I also know that in Leeds a small
 club opened and closed quite quickly cause of poor turn outs for old Acid.
 Revival means reawakening and there is NO WAY that this beast has opened
 it's eyes yet!!

 The other point is just because I/anyone else choose to play Acid House
 because I love it does not mean that I'm trying to start a revival. I just
 want to let it be heard to a new generation... if 1000's of them think is
 the best thing that they have ever heard and start wearing bright coloured
 hooded tops and pom pom hats, dungarees and timberland and shouting
 Accciiieeedd!!! at the tops of there voice, and carry it on for a year or
 two, then maybe. maybe, that's when Acid House will be awake once more!
 Until then I think it's just being tickled.

   - Original Message -
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
unfortunately- i doubt acid will get huge in the way electro has. but,
 i
do recall hearing about someone in nyc trying to start a night called
hacienda (i think it failed)
 
  Or perhaps fortunately... Treasure the magic and the mystery...
 

 I do hate revivals (sorry) -- it's just because I live in a *constant*
 state of finding out about music that has been around for ages, and
 should be celebrated. As a society we are sick with nostalgia, and while
 it might be good in terms of celebrating artists who genuinely deserve
 it, I just think revivals are a bit lame.

 I read a great quote from Mad Mike a few years ago, someone asked him
 about the electro revival, (now, which one? See?) and he said 'Electro
 never went away.' I thought 'Too f*ckin right mate.'

 Anyway, just my opinion!


 Cheers,

 Andrew

 (PS. Is there a swear filter on 313? The last two tries at this didn't
 work... I know there's been problems lately tho. Maybe the admins need
 to look at their mailserver?)