Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
Ok, I'll look into upgrading. It sounds like I need to stop paying attention to the 389 website and just stick to Redhat's site for release information. On Mar 9, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the base 1.2.11.15 release. Is that detailed somewhere? Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s changed. As a RHEL customer, you have access to the portal, so you can go to https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/rhel---6/x86_64/168/389-ds-base/1.2.11.15-50.el6_6/x86_64/fd431d51/package and look at the changelog for the 389-ds-base package. This has descriptions of the changes along with bugzilla bug number and sometimes 389 trac ticket numbers. There's probably some way to get a list of all errata for the 389-ds-base package in RHEL6, but I can't seem to find it. Found it. Unfortunately, it is not broken down by package. But if you go to this page and search for 389-ds-base you can find them. The erratas have the full documentation, bug/enhancement descriptions, and package versions. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html For example, here is the latest errata released on March 5, 2015: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0628.html -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
Thanks for your comments and updates. *Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877* 2015-03-10 1:01 GMT+01:00 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com: On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the base 1.2.11.15 release. Is that detailed somewhere? Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s changed. As a RHEL customer, you have access to the portal, so you can go to https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/rhel---6/x86_64/168/389-ds-base/1.2.11.15-50.el6_6/x86_64/fd431d51/package and look at the changelog for the 389-ds-base package. This has descriptions of the changes along with bugzilla bug number and sometimes 389 trac ticket numbers. There's probably some way to get a list of all errata for the 389-ds-base package in RHEL6, but I can't seem to find it. Found it. Unfortunately, it is not broken down by package. But if you go to this page and search for 389-ds-base you can find them. The erratas have the full documentation, bug/enhancement descriptions, and package versions. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html For example, here is the latest errata released on March 5, 2015: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0628.html -- 389 users mailing list389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
On 03/10/2015 10:57 AM, Robert Viduya wrote: Ok, I'll look into upgrading. It sounds like I need to stop paying attention to the 389 website and just stick to Redhat's site for release information. If you are a RHEL customer and you are using the 389-ds-base that is provided by RHEL, then yes, for changes to the core 389-ds-base package. On Mar 9, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com mailto:nho...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the base 1.2.11.15 release. Is that detailed somewhere? Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s changed. As a RHEL customer, you have access to the portal, so you can go to https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/rhel---6/x86_64/168/389-ds-base/1.2.11.15-50.el6_6/x86_64/fd431d51/package and look at the changelog for the 389-ds-base package. This has descriptions of the changes along with bugzilla bug number and sometimes 389 trac ticket numbers. There's probably some way to get a list of all errata for the 389-ds-base package in RHEL6, but I can't seem to find it. Found it. Unfortunately, it is not broken down by package. But if you go to this page and search for 389-ds-base you can find them. The erratas have the full documentation, bug/enhancement descriptions, and package versions. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html For example, here is the latest errata released on March 5, 2015: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0628.html -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote: I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult to maintain the copr repos. The recommended versions are now the ones provided by your base operating system. See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones. Right. We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly in maintenance mode. Is there some feature you require that is not available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version? If not, then do you really need to upgrade? Should I make the move to Fedora? It depends. Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead? The only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not yet available, but should be shortly. *Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877* -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. Is compiling from source our only option? Because, I can do that. I'd just rather not have to. On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote: I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult to maintain the copr repos. The recommended versions are now the ones provided by your base operating system. See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones. Right. We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly in maintenance mode. Is there some feature you require that is not available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version? If not, then do you really need to upgrade? Should I make the move to Fedora? It depends. Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead? The only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not yet available, but should be shortly. Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877 -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? Thanks. Is compiling from source our only option? Because, I can do that. I'd just rather not have to. On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote: I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult to maintain the copr repos. The recommended versions are now the ones provided by your base operating system. See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones. Right. We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly in maintenance mode. Is there some feature you require that is not available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version? If not, then do you really need to upgrade? Should I make the move to Fedora? It depends. Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead? The only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not yet available, but should be shortly. *Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877* -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the base 1.2.11.15 release. Is that detailed somewhere? Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s changed. -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com mailto:nho...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the base 1.2.11.15 release. Is that detailed somewhere? Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s changed. As a RHEL customer, you have access to the portal, so you can go to https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/rhel---6/x86_64/168/389-ds-base/1.2.11.15-50.el6_6/x86_64/fd431d51/package and look at the changelog for the 389-ds-base package. This has descriptions of the changes along with bugzilla bug number and sometimes 389 trac ticket numbers. There's probably some way to get a list of all errata for the 389-ds-base package in RHEL6, but I can't seem to find it. Found it. Unfortunately, it is not broken down by package. But if you go to this page and search for 389-ds-base you can find them. The erratas have the full documentation, bug/enhancement descriptions, and package versions. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html For example, here is the latest errata released on March 5, 2015: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0628.html -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
Hi Robert, Based on the changelog on our satellite server here are all the fixes beyond the base 1.2.11.15 Change Log * Tue Jan 20 2015 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-50 - Release 1.2.11.15-50 - Resolves: #1179099 - Problem with single value attribute MMR replication (DS 47915, DS 569) * Fri Jan 09 2015 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-49 - Release 1.2.11.15-49 - Resolves: #1180629 - CVE-2014-8105: information disclosure through 'cn=changelog' subtree - Resolves: #1179099 - Problem with single value attribute MMR replication (DS 47915) - Resolves: #1179595 - default nsslapd-sasl-max-buffer-size should be 2MB (DS 47457) - Resolves: #1179100 - ACI's are replaced by ACI_ALL after editing goup of ACI's including invalid one (DS 47953) * Mon Oct 27 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-48 - Release 1.2.11.15-48 - Resolves: Bug #1157395 - ns-slapd segfault in libslapd.so.0.0.0 (DS 47889) * Mon Sep 29 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-47 - Release 1.2.11.15-47 - Resolves: #1147479 - Memory leak during Reliab15 execution (6.6.z - #47750) * Fri Sep 12 2014 Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-46 - Release 1.2.11.15-46 - Resolves: #1138745 - Memory leak during Reliab15 execution * Thu Sep 11 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-45 - Release 1.2.11.15-45 - Resolves: #1112702 - Broken dereference control with the FreeIPA 4.0 ACIs (#47885) * Tue Sep 09 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-44 - Release 1.2.11.15-44 - Resolves: #1079098 - Simultaneous adding a user and binding as the user could fail in the password policy check (DS 47748) - Simple bind hangs after enabling password policy * Fri Sep 05 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-43 - Release 1.2.11.15-43 - Resolves: #1112702 - Broken dereference control with the FreeIPA 4.0 ACIs (#47885) * Thu Aug 21 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-42 - Release 1.2.11.15-42 - Resolves: #1129660 - Adding users to user group throws Internal server error. * Wed Aug 20 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-41 - Release 1.2.11.15-41 - Resolves: #1130252 - dirsrv not running with old openldap (DS 47875) * Mon Aug 18 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-40 - Release 1.2.11.15-40 - Resolves: #1130252 - dirsrv not running with old openldap (DS 47875) - Resolves: #1103287 - logconv.pl memory continually grows (DS 47446) - Resolves: #1121596 - Deleting attribute present in nsslapd-allowed-to-delete-attrs returns Operations error (DS 443) - Resolves: #1109381 - winsync doesn't sync DN valued attributes if DS DN value doesn't exist (DS 415) - Resolves: #1128759 - Performance degradation with scope ONE after some load (DS 47874) - Resolves: #1127612 - Filter AND with only one clause should be optimized (DS 47872) - Resolves: #1014111 - repl-monitor fails to convert * to default values (DS 47862) * Tue Aug 05 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-39 - Release 1.2.11.15-39 - Resolves: #1123863 EMBARGOED CVE-2014-3562 - unauthenticated information disclosure (Bug 1123477) - Resolves: #1123863 High contention on computed attribute lock (DS 616) - Resolves: #1062763 single valued attribute replicated ADD does not work (DS 47692) - Resolves: #1121596 Deleting attribute present in nsslapd-allowed-to-delete-attrs returns Operations error (DS 443) - Resolves: #1014111 Repl-monitor.pl ignores the provided connection parameters (DS 47862) - Resolves: #1115281 New defects found in 389-ds-base-1.2.11 (DS 47863) - Resolves: #1112729 paged results control is not working in some cases when we have a subsuffix. (DS 47824) * Tue Jul 01 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-38 - Release 1.2.11.15-38 - Resolves: bug 1080185 - revert - Creating a glue fails if one above level is a conflict or missing (DS 47750;Patch233) * Tue Jul 01 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-37 - Release 1.2.11.15-37 - Resolves: bug 1113606 - server restart wipes out index config if there is a default index (DS 47831) - Resolves: bug 1112702 - Broken dereference control with the FreeIPA 4.0 ACIs (DS 47821) - Resolves: bug 1080185 - Creating a glue fails if one above level is a conflict or missing (DS 47750) * Mon Jun 23 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-36 - Release 1.2.11.15-36 - Resolves: bug 1088171 - revert - 7-bit check plugin does not work for userpassword attribute (DS 47423) * Fri Jun 20 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-35 - Release 1.2.11.15-35 - Resolves: Bug 404 - 1.2.11 branch: coverity errors (DS 47820) * Mon Jun 16 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-34 - Release 1.2.11.15-34 - Resolves: bug 1109952 - memory leak in ldapsearch filter objectclass=* (DS 47780) - Resolves: bug 1109443 - Server hangs in cos_cache when adding a user entry (DS 47649) - Resolves: bug 1109333 - 389 Server crashes if uniqueMember is invalid syntax and memberOf plugin is enabled. (DS 47793) - Resolves: bug 1109335 - Parent
[389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones. Should I make the move to Fedora? *Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877* -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
