Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-03-01 Thread Frank Nordberg



John Chambers wrote:
> 
> Frank asks:
> | Can anybody tell the difference between a shottish and a Norwegian
> | reinlender then?
> 
> Yeah - They're spelled differently.
> 
> (That's the only difference that I can see.)


Richard Robinson wrote:
> 
> I wouldn't put it past the Norwegians to have a different dance for them,
...

Yep, we're a devious bunch, aren't we? We even have our own very special
kind of waltz! ;-)

> but a lot of Reinlanders can certainly be played for people dancing
> schottis, without complaint.

Well, that's more or less what happens up here too. It seems the
difference is important to the musicians while the dancers couldn't care less.
Actually, the Norwegian reinlender isn't *supposed* to be identical to
John's description of the shottish. It's just that most dancers only
know the first "tur" of the dance...


Frank
http://www.musicaviva.com


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-03-01 Thread Laurie Griffiths

No, that was someone else that wrote that.  :)
I live in the British Isles. I thought that the whole world knew that we
invented football, the wheel, tennis, language, movement etc.
L.
- Original Message -
From: Frank Nordberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes


Laurie Griffiths wrote:

>
> Yeah.  There are some old music history books that claimed  that  the
> Irish  got  the jig from the Italian tarantella.  The explanation for
> this seems to have been  that  the  historians  didn't  believe  that
> anyone  in  the  British  Isles  had  the  brains  to invent anything
> themselves, so they must have got it from more cultured people.

Well, people all over the world have always had a tendency to look
abroad for "exotic" dance music (the French/English branle-contry
dance-contre danse-contra dance-etc... connection is a prime example of
this) or if that failed, invent something (such as the French fake
Scottish "eccosaise").


When it comes to the jig, the agreed upon "truth" during the 19th and
early 20th Centuries was that the British jig came from the giga of the
Italian baroque suite, although it's obviously the other way around. But
then again, that was the dark age of musicology and you shouldn't take
*anything* written in any music history books during that period
seriously unless confirmed by more reliable sources.
That being said, the jig - as we know it from the Elizabethan period and
onwards - *is* strikingly similar to the sarabande, the canario, one of
the two most important dances knwon as "tarantella" and a couple of
other Spanish and Italian dances. So far nobody has come up with any
connection, but I think there *has* to be.

The term "jig" seems to have been originally used as a common term for
most any uptempo dance with lots of jumpin' and jivin' and jiggn'. One
of the best known mid-16th C. jigs, Kemp's jig, shows no resemblance at
all to the modern jig, but is a dead ringer for a rujero. (Concidering
the fact that it's named after a famous actor/dancer/performer, it's
probably a set dance anyway.)

X:1
T:Kemp's jig
C:anon.
O:England
Z:Transcribed by Frank Nordberg - http://www.musicaviva.com
N:Slightly simplified version
M:C
L:1/4
K:D
"D"f>e f"A"e|"Bm"d>e d"A"c|"G"B"D"A "G"B"A"c|"D"d3z:|
|:"D"fa fa|"D"fa/g/ f2|"C"eg eg|"C"ed/=c/ "G"B"A"^c|
"D"dAFA dAFA|"G"B"D"A "G"B"A"c|"D"d3z:|



Frank
http://www.musicaviva.com


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-03-01 Thread Richard Robinson

On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Frank Nordberg wrote:
> John Chambers wrote (about shottish):
> 
> ...
> 
> > the constant footwork  of:   step-step-step-hop,  step-step-step-hop,
> > step-hop-step-hop, step-hop-step-hop.
> 
> Hmmm...
> Can anybody tell the difference between a shottish and a Norwegian
> reinlender then?

Spelling :)

I wouldn't put it past the Norwegians to have a different dance for them,
but a lot of Reinlanders can certainly be played for people dancing
schottis, without complaint.

-- 
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-03-01 Thread John Chambers

Frank asks:
| ...
| John Chambers wrote (about shottish):
| > the constant footwork  of:   step-step-step-hop,  step-step-step-hop,
| > step-hop-step-hop, step-hop-step-hop.
|
| Hmmm...
| Can anybody tell the difference between a shottish and a Norwegian
| reinlender then?

Yeah - They're spelled differently.

(That's the only difference that I can see.)

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-03-01 Thread Frank Nordberg



John Chambers wrote (about shottish):

...

> the constant footwork  of:   step-step-step-hop,  step-step-step-hop,
> step-hop-step-hop, step-hop-step-hop.

Hmmm...
Can anybody tell the difference between a shottish and a Norwegian
reinlender then?

Frank
http://www.musicaviva.com


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-03-01 Thread Frank Nordberg

Laurie Griffiths wrote:

> 
> Yeah.  There are some old music history books that claimed  that  the
> Irish  got  the jig from the Italian tarantella.  The explanation for
> this seems to have been  that  the  historians  didn't  believe  that
> anyone  in  the  British  Isles  had  the  brains  to invent anything
> themselves, so they must have got it from more cultured people.

Well, people all over the world have always had a tendency to look
abroad for "exotic" dance music (the French/English branle-contry
dance-contre danse-contra dance-etc... connection is a prime example of
this) or if that failed, invent something (such as the French fake
Scottish "eccosaise").


When it comes to the jig, the agreed upon "truth" during the 19th and
early 20th Centuries was that the British jig came from the giga of the
Italian baroque suite, although it's obviously the other way around. But
then again, that was the dark age of musicology and you shouldn't take
*anything* written in any music history books during that period
seriously unless confirmed by more reliable sources.
That being said, the jig - as we know it from the Elizabethan period and
onwards - *is* strikingly similar to the sarabande, the canario, one of
the two most important dances knwon as "tarantella" and a couple of
other Spanish and Italian dances. So far nobody has come up with any
connection, but I think there *has* to be.

The term "jig" seems to have been originally used as a common term for
most any uptempo dance with lots of jumpin' and jivin' and jiggn'. One
of the best known mid-16th C. jigs, Kemp's jig, shows no resemblance at
all to the modern jig, but is a dead ringer for a rujero. (Concidering
the fact that it's named after a famous actor/dancer/performer, it's
probably a set dance anyway.)

X:1
T:Kemp's jig
C:anon.
O:England
Z:Transcribed by Frank Nordberg - http://www.musicaviva.com
N:Slightly simplified version
M:C
L:1/4
K:D
"D"f>e f"A"e|"Bm"d>e d"A"c|"G"B"D"A "G"B"A"c|"D"d3z:|
|:"D"fa fa|"D"fa/g/ f2|"C"eg eg|"C"ed/=c/ "G"B"A"^c|
"D"dAFA dAFA|"G"B"D"A "G"B"A"c|"D"d3z:|



Frank
http://www.musicaviva.com


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-03-01 Thread Phil Taylor

Richard Robinson wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, John Chambers wrote:
>
>> The word "hornpipe" does exist primarily as a  dance  term, ...
>
>I think it has also been used for an instrument name (just to confuse
>things) - unsurprisingly enough. I have a vague memory of bumping into it
>somewhere (but I can't remember where) as a translation for "chalumeau",
>which is also said to have been a forerunner of the clarinet.
>

Yep.  The hornpipe (the instrument that is) was a single reed instrument,
blown by mouth, with a bell at the bottom made from cows horn - hence
the name.

Phil Taylor


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-02-28 Thread Richard Robinson

On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, John Chambers wrote:

> The word "hornpipe" does exist primarily as a  dance  term, ...

I think it has also been used for an instrument name (just to confuse
things) - unsurprisingly enough. I have a vague memory of bumping into it
somewhere (but I can't remember where) as a translation for "chalumeau",
which is also said to have been a forerunner of the clarinet. 

-- 
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-02-28 Thread John Chambers

| How does a Schottische (or shottish) dance step go?

By some coincidence, someone just posted  a  text  description  of  a
"rant"  step, and I noticed for the first time that it's a variant of
the basic shottish step.  You can define a shottish as a couple dance
in  which  the  basic step consists of one "rant" step in place (done
without any foot-crossing), followed by  turning  around  each  other
with your basic "skipping" step (step-hop-step-hop).  The "rant" step
is of course a "step-step-step-hop", which can be done  in  place  or
moving. In the rant there is typically (but not always) foot crossing
at the start, producing a  noticeable  side-to-side  motion;  in  the
shottish this doesn't happen.

There are actually hundreds of shottish "steps", but they mostly have
the  same  footwork.   They differ by what the dancers are doing with
their upper bodies and how they move across the floor.  They  can  be
summarized  as  whatever  can be done by a pair of human bodies above
the constant footwork  of:   step-step-step-hop,  step-step-step-hop,
step-hop-step-hop, step-hop-step-hop.

These all work just fine to the typical dotted "hornpipe" rhythm. How
irregular  the musical beat is depends on local style, and shottishes
are frequently done to music that's played evenly.   It's  the  speed
that's  important.   Such  step-hop  or  skipping dances tend to want
speeds around 70-90, so reels don't work very well.  You have to turn
them into hornpipes.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-02-28 Thread Laurie Griffiths

How does a Schottische (or shottish) dance step go?
L.
- Original Message -
From: John Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes


Bryan commented:
| Joe Mc  Cool said -
| >I was told once that Hornpipes came originally from France.
|
| And I once heard that jigs were invented by the English, reels by the
Scots
| and the only sort of tune invented by the Irish was the polka.
|
| Er? Yeah, right.

Yeah.  There are some old music history books that claimed  that  the
Irish  got  the jig from the Italian tarantella.  The explanation for
this seems to have been  that  the  historians  didn't  believe  that
anyone  in  the  British  Isles  had  the  brains  to invent anything
themselves, so they must have got it from more cultured people.

There's a lot of nonsense written on such topics.  Sloppy terminology
helps.   Thus,  the  hornpipe rhythm is essentially indistinguishable
from the shottish rhythm, and in fact people do confuse  them.   I've
played music for some Irish-American groups, and seen the older folks
respond to a hornpipe by getting up in pairs and  doing  a  shottish.
When asked what that dance is called, they'll usually say "hornpipe".
A few know that it's also called "shottish".  The  step  dancers  are
usually  puzzled  by  this.   Most of the people don't care what it's
called, which just adds to the problems if you want to track down any
accurate history.

The word "hornpipe" does exist primarily as a  dance  term,  and  the
step   dance   by  that  name  is  pretty  clearly  an  international
development.  The stereotype of a sailor's dance is only partly true,
of  course,  but  sailors and merchants have historically been one of
the ways that music and dance (not to mention genes and diseases) get
spread around the world.

All of this neglects the fact that the jig and hornpipe  rhythms  are
found  in  old  music  all  over  the world.  These are basic, simple
rhythms, and it would be surprising if  a  musical  tradition  didn't
come up with them.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-02-28 Thread John Chambers

Bryan commented:
| Joe Mc  Cool said -
| >I was told once that Hornpipes came originally from France.
|
| And I once heard that jigs were invented by the English, reels by the Scots
| and the only sort of tune invented by the Irish was the polka.
|
| Er? Yeah, right.

Yeah.  There are some old music history books that claimed  that  the
Irish  got  the jig from the Italian tarantella.  The explanation for
this seems to have been  that  the  historians  didn't  believe  that
anyone  in  the  British  Isles  had  the  brains  to invent anything
themselves, so they must have got it from more cultured people.

There's a lot of nonsense written on such topics.  Sloppy terminology
helps.   Thus,  the  hornpipe rhythm is essentially indistinguishable
from the shottish rhythm, and in fact people do confuse  them.   I've
played music for some Irish-American groups, and seen the older folks
respond to a hornpipe by getting up in pairs and  doing  a  shottish.
When asked what that dance is called, they'll usually say "hornpipe".
A few know that it's also called "shottish".  The  step  dancers  are
usually  puzzled  by  this.   Most of the people don't care what it's
called, which just adds to the problems if you want to track down any
accurate history.

The word "hornpipe" does exist primarily as a  dance  term,  and  the
step   dance   by  that  name  is  pretty  clearly  an  international
development.  The stereotype of a sailor's dance is only partly true,
of  course,  but  sailors and merchants have historically been one of
the ways that music and dance (not to mention genes and diseases) get
spread around the world.

All of this neglects the fact that the jig and hornpipe  rhythms  are
found  in  old  music  all  over  the world.  These are basic, simple
rhythms, and it would be surprising if  a  musical  tradition  didn't
come up with them.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



[abcusers] Re: OT: hornpipes

2002-02-28 Thread Bryancreer

Joe Mc  Cool said -

>I was told once that Hornpipes came originally from France.

And I once heard that jigs were invented by the English, reels by the Scots 
and the only sort of tune invented by the Irish was the polka.

Er? Yeah, right.

Bryan

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html