Re: [AI] FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details
Congrats all. Finally the result came in our favor. But there are 19 students who were suppose to get job in 2010. But due to insensitivity of Gujarat government they got justice in 2013. Who is responsible for this? Will they get any kind of justice in terms of seniority or cash? I think our NGO of ahmedabad should do something significant in this regard. Because I don’t think our insensible government will do anything itself. On 7/4/13, Amiyo Biswas wrote: > Can you upload the pdf version with signature etc.? > > With best Regards, > Amiyo Biswas > Cell: +91-9433464329 > - Original Message - > From: "Dhorda hasmukh g." > To: "Accessindia " > Cc: "Keyboard" > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 9:01 AM > Subject: [AI] FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details > > >> Subject: Fw: Vidyasahayak Case Details >> forward >> >> Dear All, >> >> I am pleased to forward you the Judgment of High Court in the matter of >> Vidhya Sahayak. You will be very glad to know that due to hard work of >> all >> the blind persons who was selected as Vidhya Sahayak and were not >> appointed >> and due to cooperation of our Advocate, Mr. Kaushi Pujara, High Court >> delivered the most favourable Judgment. >> >> The summary of this landmark Judgment is given in Paragraph 16.1 of the >> Judgment which reads as follows >> >> "There is nothing on record to show that any action has been taken by the >> State Government to exempt appointment of Vidhya Sahayaks from the >> application of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act. Therefore, the >> decision of the respondents not to consider the Petitioner's for their >> appointment as Vidhya Sahayaks pursuant to the advertisement issued in >> the >> year 2010-11, as referred to hereinabove, is contrary to the provisions >> of >> Sections 32,33,34 &36 of the Act, 1995 and also unreasonable, arbitarary, >> discriminatory and violating of articles 14&16 of the Constitution of >> India". >> >> Just to inform all of you that Secretary, Department of Primary Education >> was ordered by the Court to remain present personally during the final >> hearing of the contempt application >> >> Now a good news, the Department of Primary Education has already issued >> letters to all the blind persons who had successfully comnpleted TAT >> exam. >> in respect of appointment of Vidhya Sahayak inviting them to remain >> present >> on 6th July for the finalization of their appointment. >> >> Saatyamev Jaye >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Bhushan Punani. >> - Original Message - >> From: "tarak luhar" >> To: "Bhushan Punani" >> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:45 PM >> Subject: Vidyasahayak Case Details >> >> >>> Respected Sir, >>> >>> Please find the attachment of Judgement of Vidyashayak Case. (Shri >>> K.B. Pujara Sir) >>> >>> Thanking You >>> >>> Tarak Luhar/Hitesh Chaudahri >>> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of >> >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Disclaimer: >> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >> the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its >> veracity; >> >> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails >> >> sent through this mailing list.. >> > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mai
Re: [AI] FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details
Can you upload the pdf version with signature etc.? With best Regards, Amiyo Biswas Cell: +91-9433464329 - Original Message - From: "Dhorda hasmukh g." To: "Accessindia " Cc: "Keyboard" Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 9:01 AM Subject: [AI] FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details Subject: Fw: Vidyasahayak Case Details forward Dear All, I am pleased to forward you the Judgment of High Court in the matter of Vidhya Sahayak. You will be very glad to know that due to hard work of all the blind persons who was selected as Vidhya Sahayak and were not appointed and due to cooperation of our Advocate, Mr. Kaushi Pujara, High Court delivered the most favourable Judgment. The summary of this landmark Judgment is given in Paragraph 16.1 of the Judgment which reads as follows "There is nothing on record to show that any action has been taken by the State Government to exempt appointment of Vidhya Sahayaks from the application of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act. Therefore, the decision of the respondents not to consider the Petitioner's for their appointment as Vidhya Sahayaks pursuant to the advertisement issued in the year 2010-11, as referred to hereinabove, is contrary to the provisions of Sections 32,33,34 &36 of the Act, 1995 and also unreasonable, arbitarary, discriminatory and violating of articles 14&16 of the Constitution of India". Just to inform all of you that Secretary, Department of Primary Education was ordered by the Court to remain present personally during the final hearing of the contempt application Now a good news, the Department of Primary Education has already issued letters to all the blind persons who had successfully comnpleted TAT exam. in respect of appointment of Vidhya Sahayak inviting them to remain present on 6th July for the finalization of their appointment. Saatyamev Jaye Best wishes, Bhushan Punani. - Original Message - From: "tarak luhar" To: "Bhushan Punani" Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:45 PM Subject: Vidyasahayak Case Details Respected Sir, Please find the attachment of Judgement of Vidyashayak Case. (Shri K.B. Pujara Sir) Thanking You Tarak Luhar/Hitesh Chaudahri Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
[AI] FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details
-Original message- From: ltson...@gmail.com Sent: 03/07/2013, 7:49 am To: Access india ; A k. Trasht; Advocate kishor m pal ; Akashvani ; Bakul chaturvedi ; C m hows ; C m sekretari ; Education ministar gujarat ; E t v gujarati ; Gavrang ; H.g dhoda ; Kartik sawhney ; Kiritbhai rathod ; Kirit vyas ; Kl school ; Labhubhai Tapubhai Sonani ; Mukeshbhai ; Nab ahmadavad ; Nitinbhai b bhavsar ; Parasbhai p n r ; Patrakar pareshbhai dave ; Pnr. Society ; PNR SOCIETY C.P ; PNR SOCIETY Mumbai ; Presh.Divya.bhaskar.baroda ; Presh.Gujrat.samachar baroda ; Primari education secretari of gujarat ; Rajesh mehta ; Rakhashia ; Ranchhod soni ; Shaktisinh goheel ; Shosial justis secretari gujarat office ; Shosial mineestar gujarat ; Sureshbhai trivedi ; Surykantbhai p n r ; T v 9 gujarati ; Yogeshbhai Akashvani Subject: FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details -Original message- From: Bhushan Punani Sent: 02/07/2013, 5:50 pm To: Bhavesh Patel (NAB Vadodara); Hitesh Kanabar; Praful; Prakash Mankodi; Anantbhai Shah; Bhaskar Mehta; Chandrkant Solanki; Labhbhai Sonani; NAB Gujarat Braille Press; Yahya Sapatwala; J L Kaul; Praful Vyas Subject: Fw: Vidyasahayak Case Details Dear All, I am pleased to forward you the Judgment of High Court in the matter of Vidhya Sahayak. You will be very glad to know that due to hard work of all the blind persons who was selected as Vidhya Sahayak and were not appointed and due to cooperation of our Advocate, Mr. Kaushi Pujara, High Court delivered the most favourable Judgment. The summary of this landmark Judgment is given in Paragraph 16.1 of the Judgment which reads as follows "There is nothing on record to show that any action has been taken by the State Government to exempt appointment of Vidhya Sahayaks from the application of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act. Therefore, the decision of the respondents not to consider the Petitioner's for their appointment as Vidhya Sahayaks pursuant to the advertisement issued in the year 2010-11, as referred to hereinabove, is contrary to the provisions of Sections 32,33,34 &36 of the Act, 1995 and also unreasonable, arbitarary, discriminatory and violating of articles 14&16 of the Constitution of India". Just to inform all of you that Secretary, Department of Primary Education was ordered by the Court to remain present personally during the final hearing of the contempt application Now a good news, the Department of Primary Education has already issued letters to all the blind persons who had successfully comnpleted TAT exam. in respect of appointment of Vidhya Sahayak inviting them to remain present on 6th July for the finalization of their appointment. Saatyamev Jaye Best wishes, Bhushan Punani. - Original Message - From: "tarak luhar" To: "Bhushan Punani" Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:45 PM Subject: Vidyasahayak Case Details > Respected Sir, > > Please find the attachment of Judgement of Vidyashayak Case. (Shri > K.B. Pujara Sir) > > Thanking You labhubhai sonani bhavnagar m. 9376688584 phone no 02782423917 > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
Re: [AI] FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details
All Congrats to one and all who have fought steadfastly for their rights. Warmly Harish Kotian -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Dhorda hasmukh g. Sent: 03 July 2013 09:01 To: Accessindia Cc: Keyboard Subject: [AI] FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details Subject: Fw: Vidyasahayak Case Details forward Dear All, I am pleased to forward you the Judgment of High Court in the matter of Vidhya Sahayak. You will be very glad to know that due to hard work of all the blind persons who was selected as Vidhya Sahayak and were not appointed and due to cooperation of our Advocate, Mr. Kaushi Pujara, High Court delivered the most favourable Judgment. The summary of this landmark Judgment is given in Paragraph 16.1 of the Judgment which reads as follows "There is nothing on record to show that any action has been taken by the State Government to exempt appointment of Vidhya Sahayaks from the application of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act. Therefore, the decision of the respondents not to consider the Petitioner's for their appointment as Vidhya Sahayaks pursuant to the advertisement issued in the year 2010-11, as referred to hereinabove, is contrary to the provisions of Sections 32,33,34 &36 of the Act, 1995 and also unreasonable, arbitarary, discriminatory and violating of articles 14&16 of the Constitution of India". Just to inform all of you that Secretary, Department of Primary Education was ordered by the Court to remain present personally during the final hearing of the contempt application Now a good news, the Department of Primary Education has already issued letters to all the blind persons who had successfully comnpleted TAT exam. in respect of appointment of Vidhya Sahayak inviting them to remain present on 6th July for the finalization of their appointment. Saatyamev Jaye Best wishes, Bhushan Punani. - Original Message - From: "tarak luhar" To: "Bhushan Punani" Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:45 PM Subject: Vidyasahayak Case Details > Respected Sir, > > Please find the attachment of Judgement of Vidyashayak Case. (Shri > K.B. Pujara Sir) > > Thanking You > > Tarak Luhar/Hitesh Chaudahri > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
[AI] FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details
Subject: Fw: Vidyasahayak Case Details forward Dear All, I am pleased to forward you the Judgment of High Court in the matter of Vidhya Sahayak. You will be very glad to know that due to hard work of all the blind persons who was selected as Vidhya Sahayak and were not appointed and due to cooperation of our Advocate, Mr. Kaushi Pujara, High Court delivered the most favourable Judgment. The summary of this landmark Judgment is given in Paragraph 16.1 of the Judgment which reads as follows "There is nothing on record to show that any action has been taken by the State Government to exempt appointment of Vidhya Sahayaks from the application of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act. Therefore, the decision of the respondents not to consider the Petitioner's for their appointment as Vidhya Sahayaks pursuant to the advertisement issued in the year 2010-11, as referred to hereinabove, is contrary to the provisions of Sections 32,33,34 &36 of the Act, 1995 and also unreasonable, arbitarary, discriminatory and violating of articles 14&16 of the Constitution of India". Just to inform all of you that Secretary, Department of Primary Education was ordered by the Court to remain present personally during the final hearing of the contempt application Now a good news, the Department of Primary Education has already issued letters to all the blind persons who had successfully comnpleted TAT exam. in respect of appointment of Vidhya Sahayak inviting them to remain present on 6th July for the finalization of their appointment. Saatyamev Jaye Best wishes, Bhushan Punani. - Original Message - From: "tarak luhar" To: "Bhushan Punani" Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:45 PM Subject: Vidyasahayak Case Details > Respected Sir, > > Please find the attachment of Judgement of Vidyashayak Case. (Shri > K.B. Pujara Sir) > > Thanking You > > Tarak Luhar/Hitesh Chaudahri > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
