Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams
Hello Kanchan, I also face same problem week before when I wrote entrance exam for PGD in HR conducted by IGNU. It was solved after negotiation with regional director for IGNU Bangalore. his argument is he has not received any communication from Delhi IGNO. Scribe background, class and percentage were also questioned even though she is from computer background. - Original Message - From: Amiyo Biswas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 1:02 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams Hello Kanchan, A new problem has cropped up. Recently a vh candidate was refused scribe by the Northern Regional Office of the West Bengal School Service Commission because there was no reserved seat in the examination though vh candidates were allowed in this examination with scribe in other regions. The vh candidate appeared at the reserved seat for the SC. The Office considered scribe as an extra facility. It should be categorically mentioned that whenever a vh candidate requires scribe, he should be allowed it whether there is reservation or not. The same rule should apply in considering the question of extra time. Using a scribe cannot be considered an advantage. Best regards, Amiyo. Cell: +91-9433464329 - Original Message - From: pamnani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:03 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams 1. DeenaNath Thank you for your detailed mail. Please may I use it as a part of the compilation that will be handed over to the Ministry next week? In any event I will be using some of its contents for the final draft from our side. 2. As far as the Draft Policy is concerned I had circulated a draft on 29th November on accessindia. Many of you had made suggestions. At that time I had been able to make some changes but could not complete the job so I had submitted the draft but told the Disability Commission that I needed to amend my own draft. 3. Subsequently SBI and RBI had made their comments and filed their objections. 4. Now the scope has been increased to include other disabilities. 5. I am working on the final draft and will try to post the Policy today or latest tomorrow on accessindia. Therefore I am not sending the old draft as some of you have requested. 6. Will need urgent comments to enable me to file the final document from our side and hopefully the final decision to be taken on 19th Feb. 7. If anybody has any letters from Examining Authorities or any correspondence showing the problem or any leniency given and does not mind sharing it then please let me know. Scan and send dont OCR or edit. Kanchan - Original Message - From: deena nath [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 20:45 Subject: [AI] Guidelines for exams To respond to the request from Ms. Kanchan Pamnani in 'Access India' on 8 Feb 2008, I would like to submit as follows: A totally sightless person myself, I have been working for Punjab National Bank for 22 years or so. I along with my other fellow visually disabled employees in the Bank had been facing until 2006, a common problem at the Examination Centre whenever each of us appeared for the Promotion Test. These problems included: Nowhere on the Notice Board at the Examination Centre were our Roll numbers ever written/displayed, thus, keeping us in a chaotic and confused situation that simply forced us to do nothing but stand and wait for someone to tell us which room had been arranged or where to go and report. Though the number, the names and the chosen medium of writing papers of the visually disabled candidates appearing for the Test had been well known to the Bank in advance, the arrangement of the room and the availability of the scribe had been made at random in a shabby/perfunctory manner, just 5-10 minutes before the paper would start. While our sighted counter-parts well began writing their answers, we only start filling up our personal relevant details in the answer sheet. Most of the time, we landed up getting a scribe inconsistent with the requirements coupled with late sitting, late supply of the Information Booklet, late distribution of answer sheet and non-availability of knowledgeable/responsible person at the relevant time for clarifications in case of need, simply delayed, disrupted and slowed down the process of filling up the applicable personal details and that of commencement, pace and completion of writing the Test itself. A great deal of time, that way, went already wasted/lost by the time we settled down for writing our papers. No time could we ever get for necessary familiarity and interaction with and, understanding of the scribe in terms of genuine expectations and requirements, say, his/her medium, fluency, adequate knowledge of what to tick
Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams
Hi, I have been lucky to have good scribes throughout my exams. My scribes were from the Readers Association of Chennai or close friends and relatives. Most of the time, extra time was given. Hope this helps. Thanks, K. Sriram banakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Kanchan, I also face same problem week before when I wrote entrance exam for PGD in HR conducted by IGNU. It was solved after negotiation with regional director for IGNU Bangalore. his argument is he has not received any communication from Delhi IGNO. Scribe background, class and percentage were also questioned even though she is from computer background. - Original Message - From: Amiyo Biswas To: Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 1:02 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams Hello Kanchan, A new problem has cropped up. Recently a vh candidate was refused scribe by the Northern Regional Office of the West Bengal School Service Commission because there was no reserved seat in the examination though vh candidates were allowed in this examination with scribe in other regions. The vh candidate appeared at the reserved seat for the SC. The Office considered scribe as an extra facility. It should be categorically mentioned that whenever a vh candidate requires scribe, he should be allowed it whether there is reservation or not. The same rule should apply in considering the question of extra time. Using a scribe cannot be considered an advantage. Best regards, Amiyo. Cell: +91-9433464329 - Original Message - From: pamnani To: Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:03 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams 1. DeenaNath Thank you for your detailed mail. Please may I use it as a part of the compilation that will be handed over to the Ministry next week? In any event I will be using some of its contents for the final draft from our side. 2. As far as the Draft Policy is concerned I had circulated a draft on 29th November on accessindia. Many of you had made suggestions. At that time I had been able to make some changes but could not complete the job so I had submitted the draft but told the Disability Commission that I needed to amend my own draft. 3. Subsequently SBI and RBI had made their comments and filed their objections. 4. Now the scope has been increased to include other disabilities. 5. I am working on the final draft and will try to post the Policy today or latest tomorrow on accessindia. Therefore I am not sending the old draft as some of you have requested. 6. Will need urgent comments to enable me to file the final document from our side and hopefully the final decision to be taken on 19th Feb. 7. If anybody has any letters from Examining Authorities or any correspondence showing the problem or any leniency given and does not mind sharing it then please let me know. Scan and send dont OCR or edit. Kanchan - Original Message - From: deena nath To: Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 20:45 Subject: [AI] Guidelines for exams To respond to the request from Ms. Kanchan Pamnani in 'Access India' on 8 Feb 2008, I would like to submit as follows: A totally sightless person myself, I have been working for Punjab National Bank for 22 years or so. I along with my other fellow visually disabled employees in the Bank had been facing until 2006, a common problem at the Examination Centre whenever each of us appeared for the Promotion Test. These problems included: Nowhere on the Notice Board at the Examination Centre were our Roll numbers ever written/displayed, thus, keeping us in a chaotic and confused situation that simply forced us to do nothing but stand and wait for someone to tell us which room had been arranged or where to go and report. Though the number, the names and the chosen medium of writing papers of the visually disabled candidates appearing for the Test had been well known to the Bank in advance, the arrangement of the room and the availability of the scribe had been made at random in a shabby/perfunctory manner, just 5-10 minutes before the paper would start. While our sighted counter-parts well began writing their answers, we only start filling up our personal relevant details in the answer sheet. Most of the time, we landed up getting a scribe inconsistent with the requirements coupled with late sitting, late supply of the Information Booklet, late distribution of answer sheet and non-availability of knowledgeable/responsible person at the relevant time for clarifications in case of need, simply delayed, disrupted and slowed down the process of filling up the applicable personal details and that of commencement, pace and completion of writing the Test itself. A great deal of time, that way, went already wasted/lost by the time we settled down for writing our papers. No time could we ever get for necessary familiarity and interaction with and, understanding
[AI] Guidelines for exams
To respond to the request from Ms. Kanchan Pamnani in 'Access India' on 8 Feb 2008, I would like to submit as follows: A totally sightless person myself, I have been working for Punjab National Bank for 22 years or so. I along with my other fellow visually disabled employees in the Bank had been facing until 2006, a common problem at the Examination Centre whenever each of us appeared for the Promotion Test. These problems included: Nowhere on the Notice Board at the Examination Centre were our Roll numbers ever written/displayed, thus, keeping us in a chaotic and confused situation that simply forced us to do nothing but stand and wait for someone to tell us which room had been arranged or where to go and report. Though the number, the names and the chosen medium of writing papers of the visually disabled candidates appearing for the Test had been well known to the Bank in advance, the arrangement of the room and the availability of the scribe had been made at random in a shabby/perfunctory manner, just 5-10 minutes before the paper would start. While our sighted counter-parts well began writing their answers, we only start filling up our personal relevant details in the answer sheet. Most of the time, we landed up getting a scribe inconsistent with the requirements coupled with late sitting, late supply of the Information Booklet, late distribution of answer sheet and non-availability of knowledgeable/responsible person at the relevant time for clarifications in case of need, simply delayed, disrupted and slowed down the process of filling up the applicable personal details and that of commencement, pace and completion of writing the Test itself. A great deal of time, that way, went already wasted/lost by the time we settled down for writing our papers. No time could we ever get for necessary familiarity and interaction with and, understanding of the scribe in terms of genuine expectations and requirements, say, his/her medium, fluency, adequate knowledge of what to tick where, etc. Frustratingly, English medium candidate got Hindi medium scribe and the Hindi medium candidate got English medium scribe. Also, we were seated in the hurriedly arranged room mostly not orderly -making some of us seated at the entrance of the room, too noisy particularly during extra hour, no fan, no generator back up, Late distribution of question paper and answer sheets, The responsible person coming and going, not timely guiding what to fill etc. Personally speaking, for reasons yet to be ascertained, the scribe assistance provided to me in the August 13 2006 was a mere formality and mockery of the arrangement. The scribe of the quality and standard as made available to me, was so bad and inadequate that profoundly disadvantaged me and terribly interfered with my ability to comprehend and attempt the entire question paper for reasons of his weaknesses and inadequacies (inability to speak and read even common/simple English words like: mention and sentences in the question papers clearly, correctly, coherently and intelligibly). I doubt whether I would have gone through even 40 questions. I would have certainly gone much faster and attempted many more questions had I been provided a scribe of medium of my choice who could speak and read the questions fluently, clearly, correctly coherently and intelligibly. The question had to be repeated again and again, owing to my inability to follow him. I had to simply guess and sense what word it could be. As a result of that, I lost much of my time in guessing the possibility of the words and phrases misread/misspoken rather than finding out the correct answer. Attention of the Bank Authorities was drawn to the occurrences and irregularities and, when they ignored my submissions, the matter was referred to the Office of Commission for Persons with Disabilities whereupon the Bank responded as follows: The scribe was provided to him through the Chief Test Administrator as per Head Office guidelines. However his concern about the conduct of the exam has been noted and next time better arrangement shall be made for candidates including blind candidates. The issue dragged on for a year with prolonged silence on the part of the Bank. Much of the happenings as narrated to them pertaining to the infrastructure and arrangements were tacitly acknowledged though the question of providing a quality and standard scribe was put on the back burner with no clear-cut commitment. For the time being, the matters stands resolved with assurance from the Bank that my suggestions have been noted for consideration. I had submitted to the Commission as follows: Our Roll numbers and the room(s) should be displayed on the Notice Board at the Centre as is always done in case of the sighted candidates. This will save everyones time, help us to reach the allotted
Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams
Hi I too need this - Original Message - From: Abdul Razique [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:45 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams Even me - Original Message - From: Prof. S. R. Mittal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams Dear madam. I will be happy if you could be so good as to forward the draft guidelines submitted by you to my personal e-mail id [EMAIL PROTECTED] With regards yours Mittal. - Original Message - From: Pamnani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:25 PM Subject: [AI] Guidelines for exams Friends, On the basis of your suggestions I had submitted a draft of the guidelines for examinations by the visually challenged. The ministry has expanded the scope and several other organisations have been asked to represent their views. Also the guidelines are now going to be for all disabled. The following list mentions organisations which conduct exams. Need help. a. Have you appeared for any of these exams and if so what are the problems. b. do any of these organisations have rules on examinations if so please mail them to me. C. any other suggestions Thanks Kanchan 1. Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Banking Division, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. 3. Department of Personnel Training, Govt. of India, North Block New Delhi -110001. 4. National Trust, 9th Floor, Jeevan Prakash building, K. G. Marg, New Delhi -110 001. 5. University Grants Commission, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. 6. Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi. 7. All India Council for Technical Education, I. P. Estate, New Delhi 110002. 8. Directorate General of Employment Training, Sharm Shakti Bhawn, Rafi Marg, New Delhi -110001 9. Public Enterprises Selection Board, Department of Personnel Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, Govt. of India, New Delhi 10. Staff Selection Commission, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 11. Central Board of Secondary Education, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092. 12. Department of Secondary Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi -1. 13. DD-III, Ministry of Social Justice Empowerment, New Delhi. 14. IPH, 4, Vishnu Digamber Marg, New Delhi -110002. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2866 (20080211) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams
Hello Kanchan, A new problem has cropped up. Recently a vh candidate was refused scribe by the Northern Regional Office of the West Bengal School Service Commission because there was no reserved seat in the examination though vh candidates were allowed in this examination with scribe in other regions. The vh candidate appeared at the reserved seat for the SC. The Office considered scribe as an extra facility. It should be categorically mentioned that whenever a vh candidate requires scribe, he should be allowed it whether there is reservation or not. The same rule should apply in considering the question of extra time. Using a scribe cannot be considered an advantage. Best regards, Amiyo. Cell: +91-9433464329 - Original Message - From: pamnani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:03 AM Subject: Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams 1. DeenaNath Thank you for your detailed mail. Please may I use it as a part of the compilation that will be handed over to the Ministry next week? In any event I will be using some of its contents for the final draft from our side. 2. As far as the Draft Policy is concerned I had circulated a draft on 29th November on accessindia. Many of you had made suggestions. At that time I had been able to make some changes but could not complete the job so I had submitted the draft but told the Disability Commission that I needed to amend my own draft. 3. Subsequently SBI and RBI had made their comments and filed their objections. 4. Now the scope has been increased to include other disabilities. 5. I am working on the final draft and will try to post the Policy today or latest tomorrow on accessindia. Therefore I am not sending the old draft as some of you have requested. 6. Will need urgent comments to enable me to file the final document from our side and hopefully the final decision to be taken on 19th Feb. 7. If anybody has any letters from Examining Authorities or any correspondence showing the problem or any leniency given and does not mind sharing it then please let me know. Scan and send dont OCR or edit. Kanchan - Original Message - From: deena nath [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 20:45 Subject: [AI] Guidelines for exams To respond to the request from Ms. Kanchan Pamnani in 'Access India' on 8 Feb 2008, I would like to submit as follows: A totally sightless person myself, I have been working for Punjab National Bank for 22 years or so. I along with my other fellow visually disabled employees in the Bank had been facing until 2006, a common problem at the Examination Centre whenever each of us appeared for the Promotion Test. These problems included: Nowhere on the Notice Board at the Examination Centre were our Roll numbers ever written/displayed, thus, keeping us in a chaotic and confused situation that simply forced us to do nothing but stand and wait for someone to tell us which room had been arranged or where to go and report. Though the number, the names and the chosen medium of writing papers of the visually disabled candidates appearing for the Test had been well known to the Bank in advance, the arrangement of the room and the availability of the scribe had been made at random in a shabby/perfunctory manner, just 5-10 minutes before the paper would start. While our sighted counter-parts well began writing their answers, we only start filling up our personal relevant details in the answer sheet. Most of the time, we landed up getting a scribe inconsistent with the requirements coupled with late sitting, late supply of the Information Booklet, late distribution of answer sheet and non-availability of knowledgeable/responsible person at the relevant time for clarifications in case of need, simply delayed, disrupted and slowed down the process of filling up the applicable personal details and that of commencement, pace and completion of writing the Test itself. A great deal of time, that way, went already wasted/lost by the time we settled down for writing our papers. No time could we ever get for necessary familiarity and interaction with and, understanding of the scribe in terms of genuine expectations and requirements, say, his/her medium, fluency, adequate knowledge of what to tick where, etc. Frustratingly, English medium candidate got Hindi medium scribe and the Hindi medium candidate got English medium scribe. Also, we were seated in the hurriedly arranged room mostly not orderly -making some of us seated at the entrance of the room, too noisy particularly during extra hour, no fan, no generator back up, Late distribution of question paper and answer sheets, The responsible person coming and going, not timely guiding what to fill etc. Personally speaking, for reasons yet to be ascertained, the scribe assistance provided to me in the August 13
Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams
Dear madam. I will be happy if you could be so good as to forward the draft guidelines submitted by you to my personal e-mail id [EMAIL PROTECTED] With regards yours Mittal. - Original Message - From: Pamnani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:25 PM Subject: [AI] Guidelines for exams Friends, On the basis of your suggestions I had submitted a draft of the guidelines for examinations by the visually challenged. The ministry has expanded the scope and several other organisations have been asked to represent their views. Also the guidelines are now going to be for all disabled. The following list mentions organisations which conduct exams. Need help. a. Have you appeared for any of these exams and if so what are the problems. b. do any of these organisations have rules on examinations if so please mail them to me. C. any other suggestions Thanks Kanchan 1. Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Banking Division, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. 3. Department of Personnel Training, Govt. of India, North Block New Delhi -110001. 4. National Trust, 9th Floor, Jeevan Prakash building, K. G. Marg, New Delhi -110 001. 5. University Grants Commission, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. 6. Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi. 7. All India Council for Technical Education, I. P. Estate, New Delhi 110002. 8. Directorate General of Employment Training, Sharm Shakti Bhawn, Rafi Marg, New Delhi -110001 9. Public Enterprises Selection Board, Department of Personnel Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, Govt. of India, New Delhi 10. Staff Selection Commission, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 11. Central Board of Secondary Education, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092. 12. Department of Secondary Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi -1. 13. DD-III, Ministry of Social Justice Empowerment, New Delhi. 14. IPH, 4, Vishnu Digamber Marg, New Delhi -110002. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams
Madam would you please send it to my personal Email I.D.? Thanks in advance. With regards Vijay On 2/12/08, Abdul Razique [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even me - Original Message - From: Prof. S. R. Mittal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams Dear madam. I will be happy if you could be so good as to forward the draft guidelines submitted by you to my personal e-mail id [EMAIL PROTECTED] With regards yours Mittal. - Original Message - From: Pamnani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:25 PM Subject: [AI] Guidelines for exams Friends, On the basis of your suggestions I had submitted a draft of the guidelines for examinations by the visually challenged. The ministry has expanded the scope and several other organisations have been asked to represent their views. Also the guidelines are now going to be for all disabled. The following list mentions organisations which conduct exams. Need help. a. Have you appeared for any of these exams and if so what are the problems. b. do any of these organisations have rules on examinations if so please mail them to me. C. any other suggestions Thanks Kanchan 1. Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Banking Division, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. 3. Department of Personnel Training, Govt. of India, North Block New Delhi -110001. 4. National Trust, 9th Floor, Jeevan Prakash building, K. G. Marg, New Delhi -110 001. 5. University Grants Commission, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. 6. Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi. 7. All India Council for Technical Education, I. P. Estate, New Delhi 110002. 8. Directorate General of Employment Training, Sharm Shakti Bhawn, Rafi Marg, New Delhi -110001 9. Public Enterprises Selection Board, Department of Personnel Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, Govt. of India, New Delhi 10. Staff Selection Commission, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 11. Central Board of Secondary Education, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092. 12. Department of Secondary Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi -1. 13. DD-III, Ministry of Social Justice Empowerment, New Delhi. 14. IPH, 4, Vishnu Digamber Marg, New Delhi -110002. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2866 (20080211) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- Mobile: 919346942876 Home: 9140 65131437 donate eyes and live twice To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams
Even me - Original Message - From: Prof. S. R. Mittal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams Dear madam. I will be happy if you could be so good as to forward the draft guidelines submitted by you to my personal e-mail id [EMAIL PROTECTED] With regards yours Mittal. - Original Message - From: Pamnani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:25 PM Subject: [AI] Guidelines for exams Friends, On the basis of your suggestions I had submitted a draft of the guidelines for examinations by the visually challenged. The ministry has expanded the scope and several other organisations have been asked to represent their views. Also the guidelines are now going to be for all disabled. The following list mentions organisations which conduct exams. Need help. a. Have you appeared for any of these exams and if so what are the problems. b. do any of these organisations have rules on examinations if so please mail them to me. C. any other suggestions Thanks Kanchan 1. Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Banking Division, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. 3. Department of Personnel Training, Govt. of India, North Block New Delhi -110001. 4. National Trust, 9th Floor, Jeevan Prakash building, K. G. Marg, New Delhi -110 001. 5. University Grants Commission, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. 6. Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi. 7. All India Council for Technical Education, I. P. Estate, New Delhi 110002. 8. Directorate General of Employment Training, Sharm Shakti Bhawn, Rafi Marg, New Delhi -110001 9. Public Enterprises Selection Board, Department of Personnel Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, Govt. of India, New Delhi 10. Staff Selection Commission, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 11. Central Board of Secondary Education, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092. 12. Department of Secondary Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi -1. 13. DD-III, Ministry of Social Justice Empowerment, New Delhi. 14. IPH, 4, Vishnu Digamber Marg, New Delhi -110002. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in __ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 2866 (20080211) __ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] Guidelines for exams
Hello Kanchan, Please let us know what you have finally put up for review. If you have already done it, send it to me personally. I missed some of the list mails. Best regards, Amiyo. Cell: +91-9433464329 - Original Message - From: Pamnani [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:25 PM Subject: [AI] Guidelines for exams Friends, On the basis of your suggestions I had submitted a draft of the guidelines for examinations by the visually challenged. The ministry has expanded the scope and several other organisations have been asked to represent their views. Also the guidelines are now going to be for all disabled. The following list mentions organisations which conduct exams. Need help. a. Have you appeared for any of these exams and if so what are the problems. b. do any of these organisations have rules on examinations if so please mail them to me. C. any other suggestions Thanks Kanchan 1. Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Banking Division, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. 3. Department of Personnel Training, Govt. of India, North Block New Delhi -110001. 4. National Trust, 9th Floor, Jeevan Prakash building, K. G. Marg, New Delhi -110 001. 5. University Grants Commission, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. 6. Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi. 7. All India Council for Technical Education, I. P. Estate, New Delhi 110002. 8. Directorate General of Employment Training, Sharm Shakti Bhawn, Rafi Marg, New Delhi -110001 9. Public Enterprises Selection Board, Department of Personnel Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, Govt. of India, New Delhi 10. Staff Selection Commission, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 11. Central Board of Secondary Education, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092. 12. Department of Secondary Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi -1. 13. DD-III, Ministry of Social Justice Empowerment, New Delhi. 14. IPH, 4, Vishnu Digamber Marg, New Delhi -110002. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
[AI] Guidelines for exams
Friends, On the basis of your suggestions I had submitted a draft of the guidelines for examinations by the visually challenged. The ministry has expanded the scope and several other organisations have been asked to represent their views. Also the guidelines are now going to be for all disabled. The following list mentions organisations which conduct exams. Need help. a. Have you appeared for any of these exams and if so what are the problems. b. do any of these organisations have rules on examinations if so please mail them to me. C. any other suggestions Thanks Kanchan 1. Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Banking Division, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. 3. Department of Personnel Training, Govt. of India, North Block New Delhi -110001. 4. National Trust, 9th Floor, Jeevan Prakash building, K. G. Marg, New Delhi -110 001. 5. University Grants Commission, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. 6. Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi. 7. All India Council for Technical Education, I. P. Estate, New Delhi 110002. 8. Directorate General of Employment Training, Sharm Shakti Bhawn, Rafi Marg, New Delhi -110001 9. Public Enterprises Selection Board, Department of Personnel Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, Govt. of India, New Delhi 10. Staff Selection Commission, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 11. Central Board of Secondary Education, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092. 12. Department of Secondary Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi -1. 13. DD-III, Ministry of Social Justice Empowerment, New Delhi. 14. IPH, 4, Vishnu Digamber Marg, New Delhi -110002. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
