Re: [AI] UGC net exam preparation
Hi I had cleared UGC net way back in 2012 and I can definitely help you. You can call me on 9881735784. Regards Narendra On Fri, 18 Aug, 2023, 4:04 pm Pinkesh Tailor, wrote: > Hello guys, > some of the idea for which I was planning for career enhancement > skills preparation were clearing for UGC net exams. Any help on this > such as accessible study material/coaching etc would be appreciated. > If any one who have cleared this exam can guide me in achieving the > desired outcome, would be grateful > > Thanks, > > -- > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of > the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "AccessIndia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to accessindia+unsubscr...@accessindia.org.in. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAPyTDjqYNf5pnHczGNkVaVkJF2qz9g73H3BGMDYuKS%2BVYW3sbA%40mail.gmail.com > . > -- Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AccessIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to accessindia+unsubscr...@accessindia.org.in. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAEzwMV%2BenPLs57dwJQ-%3De43qNE5CJuF67YA_gYdLWR9-RpaS1Q%40mail.gmail.com.
[AI] UGC net exam preparation
Hello guys, some of the idea for which I was planning for career enhancement skills preparation were clearing for UGC net exams. Any help on this such as accessible study material/coaching etc would be appreciated. If any one who have cleared this exam can guide me in achieving the desired outcome, would be grateful Thanks, -- Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AccessIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to accessindia+unsubscr...@accessindia.org.in. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAPyTDjqYNf5pnHczGNkVaVkJF2qz9g73H3BGMDYuKS%2BVYW3sbA%40mail.gmail.com.
[AI] UGC NET October Examination 2021:
Namaste! National Testing Agency NTA Are Recently Re Inviting Online Application Form for the UGC NET October Examination 2021. Those Candidates Are Interested to the Following Exam Can Read the Full Details Before Apply Online. Last Date for Apply Online is September 05, 2021. Interested candidates may visit below link to apply online https://testservices.nic.in/examSys21/root/Home.aspx?enc=Ei4cajBkK1gZSfgr53ImFV/yIzhTZHBze3wooSg9DjgglM5OzxXA3c3OOztO/6sA -- With warm regards, *Helpline for the Blind* [image: NAB original logo] *National Association for the Blind* Sector-5, R.K. Puram, New Delhi – 110022 India NAB Helpdesk Direct Numbers: +91 8826261166, 9212319672 Monday - Saturday 10 AM to 5 PM Email: helpl...@nabdelhi.in Website: http://www.nabdelhi.in Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nabdelhionline YouTube link https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSR__KpO4LdjmPzEqWZs6wQ? Please subscribe to this YouTube channel, you can watch recordings of previous NAB Delhi webinars here. More webinars will be stremed live here. NAB Delhi is now active on Twitter. Check out NAB Delhi (@nabdelhionline): https://twitter.com/nabdelhionline?s=09 Support Us, donate online http://www.nabdelhi.in/donate/ Income Tax Exemption under Section 80G -- -- Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AccessIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to accessindia+unsubscr...@accessindia.org.in. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CADonsassuJxd0AmPAQ_PzETGXbm%3DtTLu5a6sVZ%3D3jyS8R_Jc9Q%40mail.gmail.com.
[AI] AI UGC NET December 2018
Hi all, A friend would be appearing for the UGC NET December 2018. Wanted to know the scribe eligibility criteria for the exam. The information brochure states that the applicant has to place a request for a scribe and the same shall be provided by the Exam Superintendent only. However While filling the application form there was no such option regarding scribe. Also, if that be the case it would violate the guidelines. Please guide. Thanking you Best Turab Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
[AI] UGC NET Guide Book, Paper 1, in Audio Format Mp3
Guide book for paper 1 for UGC Net Set National Eligibility Test State Eligibility Test for Eligibility for Assistant Professor or Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) Paper 1 – Trueman Series – has been recorded by student volunteers, for the Visually Impaired – *Kirti Rohilla, Abhimanyu Thakur, Harmandeep Singh, Kanav Goyal, Lovish Bansal, Vardaan Bajaj, Rahul Kawatra, Gagandeep Singh, Divya Sharma, Dr. Daljeet Kaur, Akriti Kharian, Dev Ahuja, Rigzen Motto, Hiteshi Arora and Ruthy F. Lalhriatpuii* This Mp3 recording has been prepared by Disha N G O and can be downloaded by the V I Only, from the following link Click: https://audiobooks.ourcivilsociety.com/wp/ugc-university-grants-commission-paper-i/ Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
[AI] UGC NET december form filling
Dear friends, I am going to fil the form of UGC NET December 2014. It is my first time to fill NET exam form. Anyone in this list who have filled and appeared in this exam in any subject, please tell me its scribe rules and how to fill it. -- The most pathetic person in the world is someone who has sight but no vision. By Helen Keller. The only thing worse than being blind is having sight but no vision. By Helen Keller. -- With Warm Regards, Akash Gupta Rajasthan Skype: akash.gupta2412 Clean India Campaign: Let us also chip in! Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
[AI] UGC Net result is out.
friends, The UGC Net June 2014 result is published today. It is available in the UGC website. You can check the result in the following link. http://ugcnetonline.in/NET14J.pdf With regards, -- Jaison Bellarmine, Assistant teacher, School for the Blind Aluva, Ph: 9447067547, Off: 04846528628 Alternate email: jaison...@gmail.com, jaisonbellarm...@kbss.org Skype: Jaison.ayk Visit the website of School for the Blind Aluva, Kerala at www.kbss.org To contact: cont...@kbss.org Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/OfficialKBSS Clean India Campaign: Let us also chip in! Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
Re: [AI] UGC Net exam experience and implementation of recent scribe guidelines
Until and unless you’ll not press them for writer fee they would not remind of you for the same. A Similar event occurred at rohini 16 ugc net examination centre. One of my friend went with his own scribe hence in the end requested for writer fee, but one of the school staff said that you will get writer fee from KM college ‘the coordinating college’. But we emphatically told them that it is the business of the centre to provide writer fee and we requested her to let us meet with higher authorities. When along with her we met with the examiner then he asked for medical certificate which obviously use to have no need at that moment. When we convey the same to him then he realizes that it is not easy to eat the money and finally Pankaj’s scribe got his fee. On the other hand one of the other candidate didn’t claimed for writer fee and he went back without scribe fee,like you sir. Now my experience regarding new scribe guideline is that earlier UGC was in no mood to implement this progressive and path breaking rule, and our centre was also not allowing us to go with our own scribes, then with the timely intervention of Vikas Gupta sir and CCPD, they allowed us to bring our own scribes. Now I thought that when this exam has become objective multiple type question then writer factor doesn’t matter much, so I preferred not to go with my own writer and ask the centre to arrange an English medium student for me. when I enter in examination room and started attending my IR question then I found that this scribe who was telling herself as a teacher of the same school was neither able to read Hindi and English was to edam ram brose!! I thought that if I will force them to change her then her heart might got broken! so anyhow I attended my all questions which were obviously very tough, thanks to UGC. In the end I will suggest all the candidates to take the maximum benefit of the Pincha sir tenure, who knows how would be the next CCPD. Hats off to Pincha sir and his team for excellent working till date. Best Misbah On 7/1/13, Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com wrote: One thing which I didn't notice, that no writer allowance was given to my scribe and I completely forgot about it in the examination hall, while one of my friend's scribe in other center was given writer allowance. On 7/1/13, puneet soni puneetson...@gmail.com wrote: hi I was appearing in the examination of UGC NET/JRF with the subject of Hindi. But our paper was very difficult. We don't have hope that we will clear this time also because evrything we atempted in a paper was totaly new for us. Puneet Soni On 6/30/13, Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi listers, today I appeared in UGC Net exam in the related subject of my PG degree, that is Human Rights and Duties because I am already JRF in my main subject, law. First of all let me share very funny and blunder mistake which I committed today unwittingly. My Net center was located in Udhyog Nagar while I reached at Udhyog bhavan metro station which is not far from my hostel. I misread Udhyog Nagar to Udhyog Bhawan being well likely in their name. when I enquired the proper address from one of attendent at metro station, he was surprised with the full address of the center, he with surprise, asked my admit card, after seeing it, he emended me that your center is Udhyog Nagar and not Udhyog Bhawan! I was shocked and shaken! now the funny thing was that it was 8:15, and the distance from this metro station to the desired station was at least 1 hour travel in metro which had 3 interchange stations in between. Friends it was a dismay, but any how I managed to reach at the center at 9:47AM, while the exam was started at 9:30AM! and the entry was allowed only till 9:50! Luckily I win by 3 minutes! Thanks to Delhi metro. Now coming to the scribe and guidelines, I brought one of my friends with me to write my exam, I already having recent guidelines with me aproved by MHRD and UGC, and the copy of the case which was posted by Mr Vikas yesterday on access india. The center coordinator asked me about the qualification of my scribe , i told her that he is a graduate in the subject other then me. She didn't enquire any thing further, nore she did ask scribe to firnish any document in support of my claim, otherwise I would have argued her version with support of recent guidelines. The seating arrangement was very good. The staf was very supported and we were provided air conditioner room and the exam was very peaceful. The fact that human right paper was so easy, burgeoned my happiness, I am quite satisfied of muy performance in this paper, . Hope other candidates also experienced the same facileness from the concern centers. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel M.Phil/Masters in International Law, Center for International Legal Studies JNU. Pursuing Masters of Law, at University of Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 01127666896 Happy birthday for all times;
[AI] UGC Net exam experience and implementation of recent scribe guidelines
Hi listers, today I appeared in UGC Net exam in the related subject of my PG degree, that is Human Rights and Duties because I am already JRF in my main subject, law. First of all let me share very funny and blunder mistake which I committed today unwittingly. My Net center was located in Udhyog Nagar while I reached at Udhyog bhavan metro station which is not far from my hostel. I misread Udhyog Nagar to Udhyog Bhawan being well likely in their name. when I enquired the proper address from one of attendent at metro station, he was surprised with the full address of the center, he with surprise, asked my admit card, after seeing it, he emended me that your center is Udhyog Nagar and not Udhyog Bhawan! I was shocked and shaken! now the funny thing was that it was 8:15, and the distance from this metro station to the desired station was at least 1 hour travel in metro which had 3 interchange stations in between. Friends it was a dismay, but any how I managed to reach at the center at 9:47AM, while the exam was started at 9:30AM! and the entry was allowed only till 9:50! Luckily I win by 3 minutes! Thanks to Delhi metro. Now coming to the scribe and guidelines, I brought one of my friends with me to write my exam, I already having recent guidelines with me aproved by MHRD and UGC, and the copy of the case which was posted by Mr Vikas yesterday on access india. The center coordinator asked me about the qualification of my scribe , i told her that he is a graduate in the subject other then me. She didn't enquire any thing further, nore she did ask scribe to firnish any document in support of my claim, otherwise I would have argued her version with support of recent guidelines. The seating arrangement was very good. The staf was very supported and we were provided air conditioner room and the exam was very peaceful. The fact that human right paper was so easy, burgeoned my happiness, I am quite satisfied of muy performance in this paper, . Hope other candidates also experienced the same facileness from the concern centers. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel M.Phil/Masters in International Law, Center for International Legal Studies JNU. Pursuing Masters of Law, at University of Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 01127666896 Happy birthday for all times; Hellen Keller! June 27. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
Re: [AI] UGC Net exam experience and implementation of recent scribe guidelines
hi I was appearing in the examination of UGC NET/JRF with the subject of Hindi. But our paper was very difficult. We don't have hope that we will clear this time also because evrything we atempted in a paper was totaly new for us. Puneet Soni On 6/30/13, Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi listers, today I appeared in UGC Net exam in the related subject of my PG degree, that is Human Rights and Duties because I am already JRF in my main subject, law. First of all let me share very funny and blunder mistake which I committed today unwittingly. My Net center was located in Udhyog Nagar while I reached at Udhyog bhavan metro station which is not far from my hostel. I misread Udhyog Nagar to Udhyog Bhawan being well likely in their name. when I enquired the proper address from one of attendent at metro station, he was surprised with the full address of the center, he with surprise, asked my admit card, after seeing it, he emended me that your center is Udhyog Nagar and not Udhyog Bhawan! I was shocked and shaken! now the funny thing was that it was 8:15, and the distance from this metro station to the desired station was at least 1 hour travel in metro which had 3 interchange stations in between. Friends it was a dismay, but any how I managed to reach at the center at 9:47AM, while the exam was started at 9:30AM! and the entry was allowed only till 9:50! Luckily I win by 3 minutes! Thanks to Delhi metro. Now coming to the scribe and guidelines, I brought one of my friends with me to write my exam, I already having recent guidelines with me aproved by MHRD and UGC, and the copy of the case which was posted by Mr Vikas yesterday on access india. The center coordinator asked me about the qualification of my scribe , i told her that he is a graduate in the subject other then me. She didn't enquire any thing further, nore she did ask scribe to firnish any document in support of my claim, otherwise I would have argued her version with support of recent guidelines. The seating arrangement was very good. The staf was very supported and we were provided air conditioner room and the exam was very peaceful. The fact that human right paper was so easy, burgeoned my happiness, I am quite satisfied of muy performance in this paper, . Hope other candidates also experienced the same facileness from the concern centers. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel M.Phil/Masters in International Law, Center for International Legal Studies JNU. Pursuing Masters of Law, at University of Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 01127666896 Happy birthday for all times; Hellen Keller! June 27. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Happy birthday for all times; Hellen Keller! June 27. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
Re: [AI] UGC Net exam experience and implementation of recent scribe guidelines
One thing which I didn't notice, that no writer allowance was given to my scribe and I completely forgot about it in the examination hall, while one of my friend's scribe in other center was given writer allowance. On 7/1/13, puneet soni puneetson...@gmail.com wrote: hi I was appearing in the examination of UGC NET/JRF with the subject of Hindi. But our paper was very difficult. We don't have hope that we will clear this time also because evrything we atempted in a paper was totaly new for us. Puneet Soni On 6/30/13, Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi listers, today I appeared in UGC Net exam in the related subject of my PG degree, that is Human Rights and Duties because I am already JRF in my main subject, law. First of all let me share very funny and blunder mistake which I committed today unwittingly. My Net center was located in Udhyog Nagar while I reached at Udhyog bhavan metro station which is not far from my hostel. I misread Udhyog Nagar to Udhyog Bhawan being well likely in their name. when I enquired the proper address from one of attendent at metro station, he was surprised with the full address of the center, he with surprise, asked my admit card, after seeing it, he emended me that your center is Udhyog Nagar and not Udhyog Bhawan! I was shocked and shaken! now the funny thing was that it was 8:15, and the distance from this metro station to the desired station was at least 1 hour travel in metro which had 3 interchange stations in between. Friends it was a dismay, but any how I managed to reach at the center at 9:47AM, while the exam was started at 9:30AM! and the entry was allowed only till 9:50! Luckily I win by 3 minutes! Thanks to Delhi metro. Now coming to the scribe and guidelines, I brought one of my friends with me to write my exam, I already having recent guidelines with me aproved by MHRD and UGC, and the copy of the case which was posted by Mr Vikas yesterday on access india. The center coordinator asked me about the qualification of my scribe , i told her that he is a graduate in the subject other then me. She didn't enquire any thing further, nore she did ask scribe to firnish any document in support of my claim, otherwise I would have argued her version with support of recent guidelines. The seating arrangement was very good. The staf was very supported and we were provided air conditioner room and the exam was very peaceful. The fact that human right paper was so easy, burgeoned my happiness, I am quite satisfied of muy performance in this paper, . Hope other candidates also experienced the same facileness from the concern centers. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel M.Phil/Masters in International Law, Center for International Legal Studies JNU. Pursuing Masters of Law, at University of Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 01127666896 Happy birthday for all times; Hellen Keller! June 27. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Happy birthday for all times; Hellen Keller! June 27. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel M.Phil/Masters in International Law, Center for International Legal Studies JNU. Pursuing Masters of Law, at University of Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 01127666896 Happy birthday for all times; Hellen Keller! June 27. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile
Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE
does any one has latest info on this? Umesha - Original Message - From: S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, 19 January, 2013 9:51 AM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE Hai, I red the following at http://lislinks.com/forum/topics/ugc-appeal-on-net-posted-for-january-21 KOCHI: A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Thursday posted for final hearing on January 2I an appeal filed by the UGC against a single judge's verdict quashing the new qualifying criteria prescribed by the UGC in the National Eligibility Test for lectureships.The single judge had heid that the UGC regulations did not confer any right on the UGC to fix a high mark after holding the NET. Nor could such criteria be introduced through regulation just before the announcement of the resuits by executive orders. The introduction of the new criteria was not supported by the law. As per the new criteria, candidates in the general category who had scored an aggregate of 65 per cent for all the three papers would be eligible for lecture-ship. While the OBC candi-dates needed 60 per cent, the SC/ST candidates needed 55 percent .The single judge had also declared that the petitioners who had obtained separate minimum marks prescribed in the UGC notification had cleared the NET. The court had ordered that they should be given the necessary certif-icates in a month. When the appeal came up for hearing before the Bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice K.Vinod Chandran, counsel for the UGC S.Krishnamoor-thy contended that the High Court had no right to make a declaration regarding the re-sult of a test.It had been clearly stated in the original notification that the candidates should obtain minimum required marks in each paper separately. It had also been said that the qual-ifring criteria for Junior Re-search Fellowship and eligibility for lectureship would be decided by the UGC before the declaration of results. It was a moderation com-mittee appointed by the UGC and consisting of senior aca-demicians who had recom-mended that the general.OBC (non-creamy layer) and the SC/ST candidates wouldbe required to obtain an ag-gregate percentage of 65, 60 and 55 respectively in addi-tion to the paper-wise minimum percentage as qualifying criteria. The notification had clearly said that the final cut-off marks shall be decided by the commission before the declaration of results. The single judge's ruling would lower the standard of education.The appeal said that in order to maintain high standards in education, prescription of an aggregate percentage in an examination was well within the powers of the UGC. Prescribing the qualifying criteria by fixing an aggregate percentage could not be called changing the rule in the middle of the test Source The hindu 11/01/2013 Best Syed On 1/19/13, S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com wrote: Hai Shona, Its about the supplimentary result of June 2012 exam. Best Syed On 1/18/13, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: It is all too confusing. Where has tis 7% has now come from? In which court is the case ppending, or has it been disposed of? Why in India authorities create so much muddle, I don't know. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Shona Man Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:46 PM To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE sorry couldn't get it? can u explain? is it new criteria or what they have already applied? On 1/18/13, S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com wrote: New Update Qualifying.pdf The qualifying criteria for June-2012 Those candidates who had made it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of 40%, 40% 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for General Category; 35%, 35% 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, 35% 40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II III) of 65% for `General category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the earlier Moderation Committee). OR Those candidates who figure among top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be calculated separately for each discipline and for each category (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate marks) all the candidates appearing at the qualifying marks shall be included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their subject
Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE
sorry couldn't get it? can u explain? is it new criteria or what they have already applied? On 1/18/13, S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com wrote: New Update Qualifying.pdf The qualifying criteria for June-2012 “Those candidates who had made it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of 40%, 40% 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for General Category; 35%, 35% 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, 35% 40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II III) of 65% for `General category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the earlier Moderation Committee). OR Those candidates who figure among top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be calculated separately for each discipline and for each category (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate marks) all the candidates appearing at the qualifying marks shall be included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their subject and category.” Source: www.ugcnetonline.ac.in Best Syed Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE
It is all too confusing. Where has tis 7% has now come from? In which court is the case ppending, or has it been disposed of? Why in India authorities create so much muddle, I don't know. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Shona Man Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:46 PM To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE sorry couldn't get it? can u explain? is it new criteria or what they have already applied? On 1/18/13, S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com wrote: New Update Qualifying.pdf The qualifying criteria for June-2012 Those candidates who had made it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of 40%, 40% 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for General Category; 35%, 35% 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, 35% 40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II III) of 65% for `General category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the earlier Moderation Committee). OR Those candidates who figure among top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be calculated separately for each discipline and for each category (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate marks) all the candidates appearing at the qualifying marks shall be included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their subject and category. Source: www.ugcnetonline.ac.in Best Syed Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, smses or makes calls asking for personal information like your bank account details, passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look. Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE
Yes, really confusing! Then what about the adherence of Kerala highcourt's judgement? won't it come under contempt of court? - Original Message - From: Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:16 AM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE It is all too confusing. Where has tis 7% has now come from? In which court is the case ppending, or has it been disposed of? Why in India authorities create so much muddle, I don't know. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Shona Man Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:46 PM To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE sorry couldn't get it? can u explain? is it new criteria or what they have already applied? On 1/18/13, S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com wrote: New Update Qualifying.pdf The qualifying criteria for June-2012 Those candidates who had made it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of 40%, 40% 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for General Category; 35%, 35% 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, 35% 40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II III) of 65% for `General category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the earlier Moderation Committee). OR Those candidates who figure among top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be calculated separately for each discipline and for each category (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate marks) all the candidates appearing at the qualifying marks shall be included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their subject and category. Source: www.ugcnetonline.ac.in Best Syed Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, smses or makes calls asking for personal information like your bank account details, passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look. Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes
Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE
Hai Shona, Its about the supplimentary result of June 2012 exam. Best Syed On 1/18/13, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: It is all too confusing. Where has tis 7% has now come from? In which court is the case ppending, or has it been disposed of? Why in India authorities create so much muddle, I don't know. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Shona Man Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:46 PM To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE sorry couldn't get it? can u explain? is it new criteria or what they have already applied? On 1/18/13, S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com wrote: New Update Qualifying.pdf The qualifying criteria for June-2012 Those candidates who had made it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of 40%, 40% 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for General Category; 35%, 35% 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, 35% 40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II III) of 65% for `General category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the earlier Moderation Committee). OR Those candidates who figure among top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be calculated separately for each discipline and for each category (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate marks) all the candidates appearing at the qualifying marks shall be included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their subject and category. Source: www.ugcnetonline.ac.in Best Syed Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, smses or makes calls asking for personal information like your bank account details, passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look. Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register
Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE
Hai, I red the following at http://lislinks.com/forum/topics/ugc-appeal-on-net-posted-for-january-21 KOCHI: A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Thursday posted for final hearing on January 2I an appeal filed by the UGC against a single judge's verdict quashing the new qualifying criteria prescribed by the UGC in the National Eligibility Test for lectureships.The single judge had heid that the UGC regulations did not confer any right on the UGC to fix a high mark after holding the NET. Nor could such criteria be introduced through regulation just before the announcement of the resuits by executive orders. The introduction of the new criteria was not supported by the law. As per the new criteria, candidates in the general category who had scored an aggregate of 65 per cent for all the three papers would be eligible for lecture-ship. While the OBC candi-dates needed 60 per cent, the SC/ST candidates needed 55 percent .The single judge had also declared that the petitioners who had obtained separate minimum marks prescribed in the UGC notification had cleared the NET. The court had ordered that they should be given the necessary certif-icates in a month. When the appeal came up for hearing before the Bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice K.Vinod Chandran, counsel for the UGC S.Krishnamoor-thy contended that the High Court had no right to make a declaration regarding the re-sult of a test.It had been clearly stated in the original notification that the candidates should obtain minimum required marks in each paper separately. It had also been said that the qual-ifring criteria for Junior Re-search Fellowship and eligibility for lectureship would be decided by the UGC before the declaration of results. It was a moderation com-mittee appointed by the UGC and consisting of senior aca-demicians who had recom-mended that the general.OBC (non-creamy layer) and the SC/ST candidates wouldbe required to obtain an ag-gregate percentage of 65, 60 and 55 respectively in addi-tion to the paper-wise minimum percentage as qualifying criteria. The notification had clearly said that the final cut-off marks shall be decided by the commission before the declaration of results. The single judge's ruling would lower the standard of education.The appeal said that in order to maintain high standards in education, prescription of an aggregate percentage in an examination was well within the powers of the UGC. Prescribing the qualifying criteria by fixing an aggregate percentage could not be called changing the rule in the middle of the test Source The hindu 11/01/2013 Best Syed On 1/19/13, S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com wrote: Hai Shona, Its about the supplimentary result of June 2012 exam. Best Syed On 1/18/13, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: It is all too confusing. Where has tis 7% has now come from? In which court is the case ppending, or has it been disposed of? Why in India authorities create so much muddle, I don't know. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Shona Man Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:46 PM To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET JUNE sorry couldn't get it? can u explain? is it new criteria or what they have already applied? On 1/18/13, S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com wrote: New Update Qualifying.pdf The qualifying criteria for June-2012 Those candidates who had made it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of 40%, 40% 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for General Category; 35%, 35% 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, 35% 40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II III) of 65% for `General category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the earlier Moderation Committee). OR Those candidates who figure among top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be calculated separately for each discipline and for each category (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate marks) all the candidates appearing at the qualifying marks shall be included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their subject and category. Source: www.ugcnetonline.ac.in Best Syed Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC Net
New Update Qualifying.pdf The qualifying criteria for June-2012 “Those candidates who had made it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of 40%, 40% 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for General Category; 35%, 35% 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, 35% 40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II III) of 65% for `General category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the earlier Moderation Committee). OR Those candidates who figure among top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be calculated separately for each discipline and for each category (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate marks) all the candidates appearing at the qualifying marks shall be included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their subject and category.” Source: www.ugcnetonline.ac.in Best Syed On 1/17/13, VIJAY KUMAR P.V.S. vijay.palakod...@gmail.com wrote: Yes it is really good news for me also. Please provide the source. Eagerly waiting for its source. Thank you very much in advance With warm regards VIJAY On 13-01-2013 04:57, Neeraj Singh wrote: vary good news! could you provide the sorce of this news? Regards. Neeraj sing mobile 09630305273 skype neeraj2213 On 1/12/13, Shona Man shonam...@gmail.com wrote: good news. though i hurd that the Kerala HC order has been confirmed by Supreme Court! All students who have passed three papers individually must be awarded the benifit. On 1/11/13, prasanth P.V. prasanth.mangala...@gmail.com wrote: Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily mathrubhumi that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of Kerala HC against that dicission On 1/11/13, Prashanth prashanthmn1...@gmail.com wrote: I too surprised by the news. The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum eligibility are cleared lectureship. - Original Message - From: SC Vashishth subhashvashis...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance
Re: [AI] UGC Net
hi Syed, after several readings of above notification I couldn't understand the intention of UGC that what they are going to do? is this the criteria upon which they have decided the result of NET june 2012, or they will announce fresh result of NET june 2012 based upon above criteria? what is this top 7% candidate's matter? unable to get it? can anybody explain? On 1/17/13, S. M. syed hussain syed.ci...@gmail.com wrote: New Update Qualifying.pdf The qualifying criteria for June-2012 “Those candidates who had made it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of 40%, 40% 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for General Category; 35%, 35% 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, 35% 40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II III) of 65% for `General category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the earlier Moderation Committee). OR Those candidates who figure among top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be calculated separately for each discipline and for each category (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate marks) all the candidates appearing at the qualifying marks shall be included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their subject and category.” Source: www.ugcnetonline.ac.in Best Syed On 1/17/13, VIJAY KUMAR P.V.S. vijay.palakod...@gmail.com wrote: Yes it is really good news for me also. Please provide the source. Eagerly waiting for its source. Thank you very much in advance With warm regards VIJAY On 13-01-2013 04:57, Neeraj Singh wrote: vary good news! could you provide the sorce of this news? Regards. Neeraj sing mobile 09630305273 skype neeraj2213 On 1/12/13, Shona Man shonam...@gmail.com wrote: good news. though i hurd that the Kerala HC order has been confirmed by Supreme Court! All students who have passed three papers individually must be awarded the benifit. On 1/11/13, prasanth P.V. prasanth.mangala...@gmail.com wrote: Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily mathrubhumi that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of Kerala HC against that dicission On 1/11/13, Prashanth prashanthmn1...@gmail.com wrote: I too surprised by the news. The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum eligibility are cleared lectureship. - Original Message - From: SC Vashishth subhashvashis...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed
Re: [AI] UGC Net
Yes it is really good news for me also. Please provide the source. Eagerly waiting for its source. Thank you very much in advance With warm regards VIJAY On 13-01-2013 04:57, Neeraj Singh wrote: vary good news! could you provide the sorce of this news? Regards. Neeraj sing mobile 09630305273 skype neeraj2213 On 1/12/13, Shona Man shonam...@gmail.com wrote: good news. though i hurd that the Kerala HC order has been confirmed by Supreme Court! All students who have passed three papers individually must be awarded the benifit. On 1/11/13, prasanth P.V. prasanth.mangala...@gmail.com wrote: Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily mathrubhumi that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of Kerala HC against that dicission On 1/11/13, Prashanth prashanthmn1...@gmail.com wrote: I too surprised by the news. The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum eligibility are cleared lectureship. - Original Message - From: SC Vashishth subhashvashis...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know
Re: [AI] UGC Net
If the info is based on Times of India report, it is not reliable. Because lot of inconsistencies were there. - Original Message - From: VIJAY KUMAR P.V.S. vijay.palakod...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:43 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net Yes it is really good news for me also. Please provide the source. Eagerly waiting for its source. Thank you very much in advance With warm regards VIJAY On 13-01-2013 04:57, Neeraj Singh wrote: vary good news! could you provide the sorce of this news? Regards. Neeraj sing mobile 09630305273 skype neeraj2213 On 1/12/13, Shona Man shonam...@gmail.com wrote: good news. though i hurd that the Kerala HC order has been confirmed by Supreme Court! All students who have passed three papers individually must be awarded the benifit. On 1/11/13, prasanth P.V. prasanth.mangala...@gmail.com wrote: Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily mathrubhumi that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of Kerala HC against that dicission On 1/11/13, Prashanth prashanthmn1...@gmail.com wrote: I too surprised by the news. The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum eligibility are cleared lectureship. - Original Message - From: SC Vashishth subhashvashis...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above
Re: [AI] UGC Net
vary good news! could you provide the sorce of this news? Regards. Neeraj sing mobile 09630305273 skype neeraj2213 On 1/12/13, Shona Man shonam...@gmail.com wrote: good news. though i hurd that the Kerala HC order has been confirmed by Supreme Court! All students who have passed three papers individually must be awarded the benifit. On 1/11/13, prasanth P.V. prasanth.mangala...@gmail.com wrote: Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily mathrubhumi that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of Kerala HC against that dicission On 1/11/13, Prashanth prashanthmn1...@gmail.com wrote: I too surprised by the news. The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum eligibility are cleared lectureship. - Original Message - From: SC Vashishth subhashvashis...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43
Re: [AI] UGC Net
good news. though i hurd that the Kerala HC order has been confirmed by Supreme Court! All students who have passed three papers individually must be awarded the benifit. On 1/11/13, prasanth P.V. prasanth.mangala...@gmail.com wrote: Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily mathrubhumi that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of Kerala HC against that dicission On 1/11/13, Prashanth prashanthmn1...@gmail.com wrote: I too surprised by the news. The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum eligibility are cleared lectureship. - Original Message - From: SC Vashishth subhashvashis...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be declared successful. She sought
Re: [AI] UGC Net
Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily mathrubhumi that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of Kerala HC against that dicission On 1/11/13, Prashanth prashanthmn1...@gmail.com wrote: I too surprised by the news. The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum eligibility are cleared lectureship. - Original Message - From: SC Vashishth subhashvashis...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be declared successful. She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of June 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach
[AI] UGC Net
I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be declared successful. She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of June 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not responded properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In Kerala, the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC notification, as the number of candidates were much more. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1_ugc-notification-ugc-officials-three-papers With thanks and regards (Rajesh Asudani) Assistant General Manager Reserve Bank of India Nagpur Cell: 9420397185 o: +91 712 2806846 R: 2591349 (In youth you want things, and then in middle-age you want to want them.) Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, smses or makes calls asking for personal information like your bank account details, passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look. Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC Net
I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be declared successful. She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of June 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not responded properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In Kerala, the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC notification, as the number of candidates were much more. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1_ugc-notification-ugc-officials-three-papers With thanks and regards (Rajesh Asudani) Assistant General Manager Reserve Bank of India Nagpur Cell: 9420397185 o: +91 712 2806846 R: 2591349 (In youth you want things, and then in middle-age you want
Re: [AI] UGC Net
I too surprised by the news. The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] issue certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having minimum eligibility are cleared lectureship. - Original Message - From: SC Vashishth subhashvashis...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation get that relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the benefit by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the process untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual writs. By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't invites situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the Kerala HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for clarifications. We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement meaning thereby that the order has achieved finality. Another question is how do a person know that there is already an order from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development happening in the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or policies affecting the persons with disabilities in general. regards On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote: I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a lawyer by training myself. Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a ruling in favor of candidates. So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the similar ruling for all candidates? Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all candidates automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, but it is a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight separately, when a provision is affecting many persons. PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prashanth Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM To: AccessIndia Cc: World Opinion Google's group: Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University Grants Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came under fire from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come clear on the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National Eligibility Test (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun Chaudhari granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance to decide its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with orders, if UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked UGC officials to be present at the next hearing. The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by Gokulpeth resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification imposing minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last year. The test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various subjects for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel Trupti Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and 50% in the third. She contended that there was no mention of the necessity to score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will be the criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria was never communicated till the declaration of the result. When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was declared failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that UGC had fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to have scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she should be declared successful. She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification of June 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for general category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in law. The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight of candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not responded properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In Kerala, the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC notification, as the number of candidates were much
Re: [AI] UGC Net exam and wrong selection of catagories
hi shona, UGC has a very peculiar way of selecting JRF candidates. it is not according to the procedure you specified. it same for SC/ST and OBC also. once I got that through an RTI application. I will upload that when time permits. Umesha - Original Message - From: Shona Man shonam...@gmail.com To: accessindia accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Tuesday, 27 November, 2012 12:43 AM Subject: [AI] UGC Net exam and wrong selection of catagories Hi friends in the last UGC net exam held in june 2012, UGC has awarded JRF to the reserve catagories in virticle manner rather then horizontal, it mean as per 3% reservation of Physically Handicapped only 3 PH candidates were given JRF irrespective of their high marit than general candidates. say for e.g. if subject law has 125 seats of JRF in this condition 4 PH candidates as per 3% reservation will get JRF. But 3 out of these 4 candidates scored higher marit than general candidates. As per govt of india norms these 3 candidates who scored higher marit than general candidates should have been transfered to general catagory due to their high marit and the 3 seats would have been vacant for another 3 PH candidates. But they have not done it. UGC has given only 4 JRF out of 125 irrespective of their high marit. Rather sc st candidates at the lower marit got jrf. say for e.g. the cut off marit for PH candidates was 68% while for sc and st it is generally 65%. My question is that what we can do to remove this disparity and can we demand that at least PH candidates should be considered at par with the sc st candidates in the marit cut off for the award of jrf. friends any body recalls the name of the judgement pronounced by Delhi high court recently where HC ordered that admission to PH candidate in DTU should be offered at the marit equivalent to SCs and STs? -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC Net exam and wrong selection of catagories
thats fine but they claim that the award will be as per govt of india norms, but what ever they are doing is totally in contrast of such norms! On 11/27/12, Umesha Economics umesha@gmail.com wrote: hi shona, UGC has a very peculiar way of selecting JRF candidates. it is not according to the procedure you specified. it same for SC/ST and OBC also. once I got that through an RTI application. I will upload that when time permits. Umesha - Original Message - From: Shona Man shonam...@gmail.com To: accessindia accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Tuesday, 27 November, 2012 12:43 AM Subject: [AI] UGC Net exam and wrong selection of catagories Hi friends in the last UGC net exam held in june 2012, UGC has awarded JRF to the reserve catagories in virticle manner rather then horizontal, it mean as per 3% reservation of Physically Handicapped only 3 PH candidates were given JRF irrespective of their high marit than general candidates. say for e.g. if subject law has 125 seats of JRF in this condition 4 PH candidates as per 3% reservation will get JRF. But 3 out of these 4 candidates scored higher marit than general candidates. As per govt of india norms these 3 candidates who scored higher marit than general candidates should have been transfered to general catagory due to their high marit and the 3 seats would have been vacant for another 3 PH candidates. But they have not done it. UGC has given only 4 JRF out of 125 irrespective of their high marit. Rather sc st candidates at the lower marit got jrf. say for e.g. the cut off marit for PH candidates was 68% while for sc and st it is generally 65%. My question is that what we can do to remove this disparity and can we demand that at least PH candidates should be considered at par with the sc st candidates in the marit cut off for the award of jrf. friends any body recalls the name of the judgement pronounced by Delhi high court recently where HC ordered that admission to PH candidate in DTU should be offered at the marit equivalent to SCs and STs? -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC NET
I am unable to download the result file, when i am downloading the file it says that it is corrupted or damaged, therefore send me the result of ugc net. On 6/17/12, Jyothsna Phanija phanija.literat...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, i got qualified for UGC NET in english literature. B. Jyothsnaphanija, PhD research scholar, Department of English Literature, English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India. Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
[AI] UGC NET exam held in December 2011, results out!
Check by locating your roll Number. http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/netresults.html -- Avinash Shahi M.A. Political Science CPS JNU New Delhi India You can join my group 'World opinion' By hitting enter on http://groups.google.com/group/worldopinion/sub?s=KL4UmBQAAADtinq5nhhn1yahwny9uS1o7bui7rJFiLdJKj94WgW_0Qhl=en Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
[AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon
UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon hint of which was given in a press release by UGC Officials on December 24, 2011 in New Delhi. NOW THE 3 PAPER OF UGC NET WILL ALSO BE AN OBJECTIVE PAPER AS PAPER 1 PAPER 2. Students appearing for the National Eligibility Test (NET), 2012 will be able to evaluate their performance immediately after appearing for the much-simplified test. The University Grants Commission (UGC), which conducts the test for around 2.5 lakh students twice a year, on Thursday decided that candidates can take carbon prints of their optical reader answer sheets with them. This will enable students to know instantly how they have fared in the test, said UGC chairperson Ved Prakash. In another decision, the UGC has decided that all the question papers for the test will be objective type. Till now, two papers were objective and the third one subjective. This has led to delay in declaration of the results, sometimes forcing students to appear again. Students had earlier expressed their unhappiness over evaluation in the subjective type paper. Now, we will be able to declare the results much before next NET and to the satisfaction of students, Prakash said. The format will be applicable for the June 2012 exam and results will be announced by October before the next exam in December 2012. Only those who clear the NET are eligible for junior research fellowship and for appointment in colleges and universities. this article can be found on the following link: http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Know-how-you-fared-in-NET-instantly/Article1-786360.aspx it would be worth mention that no such kind of notification is available anywhere on the UGC website -- -- M.Phil scholar at JNU Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon
Now the third paper is the only way by which a candidates skills can be propperly measured. If that also is going to be an objective paper, why should we conduct such a test. farcical. On 1/7/12, Salman Raafay salmanraa...@gmail.com wrote: UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon hint of which was given in a press release by UGC Officials on December 24, 2011 in New Delhi. NOW THE 3 PAPER OF UGC NET WILL ALSO BE AN OBJECTIVE PAPER AS PAPER 1 PAPER 2. Students appearing for the National Eligibility Test (NET), 2012 will be able to evaluate their performance immediately after appearing for the much-simplified test. The University Grants Commission (UGC), which conducts the test for around 2.5 lakh students twice a year, on Thursday decided that candidates can take carbon prints of their optical reader answer sheets with them. This will enable students to know instantly how they have fared in the test, said UGC chairperson Ved Prakash. In another decision, the UGC has decided that all the question papers for the test will be objective type. Till now, two papers were objective and the third one subjective. This has led to delay in declaration of the results, sometimes forcing students to appear again. Students had earlier expressed their unhappiness over evaluation in the subjective type paper. Now, we will be able to declare the results much before next NET and to the satisfaction of students, Prakash said. The format will be applicable for the June 2012 exam and results will be announced by October before the next exam in December 2012. Only those who clear the NET are eligible for junior research fellowship and for appointment in colleges and universities. this article can be found on the following link: http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Know-how-you-fared-in-NET-instantly/Article1-786360.aspx it would be worth mention that no such kind of notification is available anywhere on the UGC website -- -- M.Phil scholar at JNU Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon
yes i too agree. 3rd paper should be in discriptive type. - Original Message - From: habeeb. c habee...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon Now the third paper is the only way by which a candidates skills can be propperly measured. If that also is going to be an objective paper, why should we conduct such a test. farcical. On 1/7/12, Salman Raafay salmanraa...@gmail.com wrote: UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon hint of which was given in a press release by UGC Officials on December 24, 2011 in New Delhi. NOW THE 3 PAPER OF UGC NET WILL ALSO BE AN OBJECTIVE PAPER AS PAPER 1 PAPER 2. Students appearing for the National Eligibility Test (NET), 2012 will be able to evaluate their performance immediately after appearing for the much-simplified test. The University Grants Commission (UGC), which conducts the test for around 2.5 lakh students twice a year, on Thursday decided that candidates can take carbon prints of their optical reader answer sheets with them. This will enable students to know instantly how they have fared in the test, said UGC chairperson Ved Prakash. In another decision, the UGC has decided that all the question papers for the test will be objective type. Till now, two papers were objective and the third one subjective. This has led to delay in declaration of the results, sometimes forcing students to appear again. Students had earlier expressed their unhappiness over evaluation in the subjective type paper. Now, we will be able to declare the results much before next NET and to the satisfaction of students, Prakash said. The format will be applicable for the June 2012 exam and results will be announced by October before the next exam in December 2012. Only those who clear the NET are eligible for junior research fellowship and for appointment in colleges and universities. this article can be found on the following link: http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Know-how-you-fared-in-NET-instantly/Article1-786360.aspx it would be worth mention that no such kind of notification is available anywhere on the UGC website -- -- M.Phil scholar at JNU Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon
I think this paper should remain in discriptive form. I have seen many people who aquire less marks in written exams but there skill of putting correct tick upon the alternatives is very high, they will surely qualify NET this time. But friends what about us, is this benificial for a visually challanged or no? since variously we do not find good writers so that they could not write speadly and correctly as dictated by us, while now we will have to opt only the correct option and we can gather good marks. On 1/7/12, padmanabham padmanabam.mu...@gmail.com wrote: yes i too agree. 3rd paper should be in discriptive type. - Original Message - From: habeeb. c habee...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon Now the third paper is the only way by which a candidates skills can be propperly measured. If that also is going to be an objective paper, why should we conduct such a test. farcical. On 1/7/12, Salman Raafay salmanraa...@gmail.com wrote: UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon hint of which was given in a press release by UGC Officials on December 24, 2011 in New Delhi. NOW THE 3 PAPER OF UGC NET WILL ALSO BE AN OBJECTIVE PAPER AS PAPER 1 PAPER 2. Students appearing for the National Eligibility Test (NET), 2012 will be able to evaluate their performance immediately after appearing for the much-simplified test. The University Grants Commission (UGC), which conducts the test for around 2.5 lakh students twice a year, on Thursday decided that candidates can take carbon prints of their optical reader answer sheets with them. This will enable students to know instantly how they have fared in the test, said UGC chairperson Ved Prakash. In another decision, the UGC has decided that all the question papers for the test will be objective type. Till now, two papers were objective and the third one subjective. This has led to delay in declaration of the results, sometimes forcing students to appear again. Students had earlier expressed their unhappiness over evaluation in the subjective type paper. Now, we will be able to declare the results much before next NET and to the satisfaction of students, Prakash said. The format will be applicable for the June 2012 exam and results will be announced by October before the next exam in December 2012. Only those who clear the NET are eligible for junior research fellowship and for appointment in colleges and universities. this article can be found on the following link: http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Know-how-you-fared-in-NET-instantly/Article1-786360.aspx it would be worth mention that no such kind of notification is available anywhere on the UGC website -- -- M.Phil scholar at JNU Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon
yes due to the scribe problems being faced by our VI community, objective type is prefferable. - Original Message - From: Shona Man shonam...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 8:39 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon I think this paper should remain in discriptive form. I have seen many people who aquire less marks in written exams but there skill of putting correct tick upon the alternatives is very high, they will surely qualify NET this time. But friends what about us, is this benificial for a visually challanged or no? since variously we do not find good writers so that they could not write speadly and correctly as dictated by us, while now we will have to opt only the correct option and we can gather good marks. On 1/7/12, padmanabham padmanabam.mu...@gmail.com wrote: yes i too agree. 3rd paper should be in discriptive type. - Original Message - From: habeeb. c habee...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon Now the third paper is the only way by which a candidates skills can be propperly measured. If that also is going to be an objective paper, why should we conduct such a test. farcical. On 1/7/12, Salman Raafay salmanraa...@gmail.com wrote: UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon hint of which was given in a press release by UGC Officials on December 24, 2011 in New Delhi. NOW THE 3 PAPER OF UGC NET WILL ALSO BE AN OBJECTIVE PAPER AS PAPER 1 PAPER 2. Students appearing for the National Eligibility Test (NET), 2012 will be able to evaluate their performance immediately after appearing for the much-simplified test. The University Grants Commission (UGC), which conducts the test for around 2.5 lakh students twice a year, on Thursday decided that candidates can take carbon prints of their optical reader answer sheets with them. This will enable students to know instantly how they have fared in the test, said UGC chairperson Ved Prakash. In another decision, the UGC has decided that all the question papers for the test will be objective type. Till now, two papers were objective and the third one subjective. This has led to delay in declaration of the results, sometimes forcing students to appear again. Students had earlier expressed their unhappiness over evaluation in the subjective type paper. Now, we will be able to declare the results much before next NET and to the satisfaction of students, Prakash said. The format will be applicable for the June 2012 exam and results will be announced by October before the next exam in December 2012. Only those who clear the NET are eligible for junior research fellowship and for appointment in colleges and universities. this article can be found on the following link: http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Know-how-you-fared-in-NET-instantly/Article1-786360.aspx it would be worth mention that no such kind of notification is available anywhere on the UGC website -- -- M.Phil scholar at JNU Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes
Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon
hi, Every system, test procedure has merit and demerit and we should take the positive end result. If the paper is of objective type then vi candidate cannot blame anybody if he/she fails. Scribe which UGC provides do not meet the expected requirement of vi persons specially in literature per. - Original Message - From: habeeb. c habee...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [AI] UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon Now the third paper is the only way by which a candidates skills can be propperly measured. If that also is going to be an objective paper, why should we conduct such a test. farcical. On 1/7/12, Salman Raafay salmanraa...@gmail.com wrote: UGC NET examination patern expected to be revised soon hint of which was given in a press release by UGC Officials on December 24, 2011 in New Delhi. NOW THE 3 PAPER OF UGC NET WILL ALSO BE AN OBJECTIVE PAPER AS PAPER 1 PAPER 2. Students appearing for the National Eligibility Test (NET), 2012 will be able to evaluate their performance immediately after appearing for the much-simplified test. The University Grants Commission (UGC), which conducts the test for around 2.5 lakh students twice a year, on Thursday decided that candidates can take carbon prints of their optical reader answer sheets with them. This will enable students to know instantly how they have fared in the test, said UGC chairperson Ved Prakash. In another decision, the UGC has decided that all the question papers for the test will be objective type. Till now, two papers were objective and the third one subjective. This has led to delay in declaration of the results, sometimes forcing students to appear again. Students had earlier expressed their unhappiness over evaluation in the subjective type paper. Now, we will be able to declare the results much before next NET and to the satisfaction of students, Prakash said. The format will be applicable for the June 2012 exam and results will be announced by October before the next exam in December 2012. Only those who clear the NET are eligible for junior research fellowship and for appointment in colleges and universities. this article can be found on the following link: http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Know-how-you-fared-in-NET-instantly/Article1-786360.aspx it would be worth mention that no such kind of notification is available anywhere on the UGC website -- -- M.Phil scholar at JNU Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] uGC net sylabus for history
visit www.ugc.ac.in - Original Message - From: Sohan polite.s...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 7:37 PM Subject: [AI] uGC net sylabus for history hi access indians if anyone is preparing for net in history please tell me how to and from where I can get syllabus of net history. Please tell me because i am in urgent need for this. please if somebody can provide it to me, i will be very grateful to him. thanks in advance. sohan singh. polite.s...@gmail.com To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
[AI] uGC net sylabus for history
hi access indians if anyone is preparing for net in history please tell me how to and from where I can get syllabus of net history. Please tell me because i am in urgent need for this. please if somebody can provide it to me, i will be very grateful to him. thanks in advance. sohan singh. polite.s...@gmail.com To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] uGC net sylabus for history
Hello, you can get the syllabus from the following webcite: ugc.ac.in On 11/2/10, Sohan polite.s...@gmail.com wrote: hi access indians if anyone is preparing for net in history please tell me how to and from where I can get syllabus of net history. Please tell me because i am in urgent need for this. please if somebody can provide it to me, i will be very grateful to him. thanks in advance. sohan singh. polite.s...@gmail.com To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in -- True friendship consists not innmultitude of friends, but in their worth and value To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Re: [AI] uGC net sylabus for history
Hello sohan, Please visit: http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/syllabus.html Warm Regards MohammadWaseemKhan Land: 01165154282 Mob: 9213749272 Emails bestmu...@gmail.com, mohammadwase...@gmail.com, mohammadwaseemk...@yahoo.com. MSN: mr.waseemk...@hotmail.com Skype: sweetboy250 - Original Message - From: Sohan polite.s...@gmail.com To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 7:07 AM Subject: [AI] uGC net sylabus for history hi access indians if anyone is preparing for net in history please tell me how to and from where I can get syllabus of net history. Please tell me because i am in urgent need for this. please if somebody can provide it to me, i will be very grateful to him. thanks in advance. sohan singh. polite.s...@gmail.com To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
[AI] UGC NET exam:
Hello friends, I'm glad to inform you that the U.G.C. has ennounced its NET exam on 27th december 2009. The last for submission of applications is 6th november. for further details please visit www.ugc.ac.in Yours, Surya. To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
