Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Furthermore, where are the case details which Katia was talking about? How many hours are there in your single day? -Original Message- From: akhilesh Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 1:53 PM To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Kasia..! I know her personally that's why speaking. not morons like you keep blabbering believing in "hearsay nonsense talks" and without any evidences. Don't talk if you have nothing constructive to offer. believe me, Learn to use the brains in constructive ways.. It will cost you nothing.. your friends who are moving complaint boxes are getting free legal advice at the comfort of their homes!. ask them to visit some courts for their legal solutions and experience the heat first hand and then talk..! On 5/19/14, Shadab Husain wrote: Friends, Kanchan ma'am have always been of great help to me, she is just like my elder sister and the moderator must demand apology from Kasia or remove him from the list. (I am polite to say that he must apologise.) It is very unfortunate that Kanchan ma'am has to waste her important time because of that person. Moderator I am very upset by the disgust spewed on the list, and have wasted time reading all the emails on this important topic which was not so important for me because I saw your email. The level of Access India has fallen very low. Poor. Moderator will you always remain polite with ridiculous people? Access India is a nice list, I have made many good friends here, but forgiveness will convert it to garbage. Weed out the dead-wood forthwith. On 5/19/14, payal wrote: Unfounded spouting of venom is really something we can do without on this list. Unfortunately we don't have any defamation clauses on this list. A member out of nowhere decides he/she can say whatever they choose about a member of longstanding repute is not only unfortunate but also uncalled for. I agree with the rest when they say this information should be expunged with sufficient action taken against persons like this to ensure name calling and venom spouting is kept out. What Kanchan has done, is known to most on this list here. no action was taken on an earlier occasion when things were said in unsavoury manner too. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Rahul Kelapure Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 10:06 AM To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Strainge it is. Kanchan had been composed and civil iin her reply and Kasia is going on and on for nothing. Kasia, if you had any problem with Kanchan, you should have sent her a private mail instead of writing on the list. You accuse Kanchan of something on some hearsay and you expect she shouldn't respond to you on the list? how bizzarre is that. I am the testimony as to how Kanchan had helped me and there are so many others like me I am sure. Kasia, you must apologise. Harish, please interveen in the matter. On 5/19/14, li...@srinivasu.org wrote: Kasia, I can write at least hundred good things that Kanchan has done and helped community inspire legal is her core profession. Can you have point me ten good things that you have done to help people on this list. I would suggest ease make best use of the list and if you can't, this is not the right forum for you. Regards, Srinivasu Chakravarthula | PayPal | @csrinivasu Sent from my iPhone 5C On 19-May-2014, at 6:08, "Kasia" wrote: O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether she's a lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with her fake fantacies. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of akhilesh Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Dear Kasia, if you can mind your language please? Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we know it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them without any research. hmm? Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of this list and also of this society. On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It mi
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Kasia..! I know her personally that's why speaking. not morons like you keep blabbering believing in "hearsay nonsense talks" and without any evidences. Don't talk if you have nothing constructive to offer. believe me, Learn to use the brains in constructive ways.. It will cost you nothing.. your friends who are moving complaint boxes are getting free legal advice at the comfort of their homes!. ask them to visit some courts for their legal solutions and experience the heat first hand and then talk..! On 5/19/14, Shadab Husain wrote: > Friends, Kanchan ma'am have always been of great help to me, she is > just like my elder sister and the moderator must demand apology from > Kasia or remove him from the list. (I am polite to say that he must > apologise.) It is very unfortunate that Kanchan ma'am has to waste her > important time because of that person. Moderator I am very upset by > the disgust spewed on the list, and have wasted time reading all the > emails on this important topic which was not so important for me > because I saw your email. The level of Access India has fallen very > low. Poor. Moderator will you always remain polite with ridiculous > people? Access India is a nice list, I have made many good friends > here, but forgiveness will convert it to garbage. Weed out the > dead-wood forthwith. > > > > On 5/19/14, payal wrote: >> Unfounded spouting of venom is really something we can do without on this >> list. Unfortunately we don't have any defamation clauses on this list. >> A member out of nowhere decides he/she can say whatever they choose about >> a >> member of longstanding repute is not only unfortunate but also uncalled >> for. >> >> I agree with the rest when they say this information should be expunged >> with >> sufficient action taken against persons like this to ensure name calling >> and >> venom spouting is kept out. >> What Kanchan has done, is known to most on this list here. no action was >> taken on an earlier occasion when things were said in unsavoury manner >> too. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf >> Of Rahul Kelapure >> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 10:06 AM >> To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerningthe disabled. >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >> Delhi >> judicial services exam >> >> Strainge it is. >> >> Kanchan had been composed and civil iin her reply and Kasia is going >> on and on for nothing. >> >> Kasia, if you had any problem with Kanchan, you should have sent her a >> private mail instead of writing on the list. You accuse Kanchan of >> something on some hearsay and you expect she shouldn't respond to you >> on the list? how bizzarre is that. >> >> I am the testimony as to how Kanchan had helped me and there are so >> many others like me I am sure. >> >> Kasia, you must apologise. >> >> Harish, please interveen in the matter. >> >> On 5/19/14, li...@srinivasu.org wrote: >>> Kasia, >>> I can write at least hundred good things that Kanchan has done and >>> helped >>> community inspire legal is her core profession. Can you have point me >>> ten >>> good things that you have done to help people on this list. I would >> suggest >>> ease make best use of the list and if you can't, this is not the right >> forum >>> for you. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Srinivasu Chakravarthula | PayPal | @csrinivasu >>> Sent from my iPhone 5C >>> >>>> On 19-May-2014, at 6:08, "Kasia" wrote: >>>> >>>> O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether >>>> she's >>>> a >>>> lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with >>>> her >>>> fake fantacies. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>>> Behalf >>>> Of akhilesh >>>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM >>>> To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>>> concerning >>>> the disabled. >>>> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >>>> Delhi >>>> judicial services exam >>>> >>>> Dear Kasia, >>>> if you can mind your language please? >
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Friends, Kanchan ma'am have always been of great help to me, she is just like my elder sister and the moderator must demand apology from Kasia or remove him from the list. (I am polite to say that he must apologise.) It is very unfortunate that Kanchan ma'am has to waste her important time because of that person. Moderator I am very upset by the disgust spewed on the list, and have wasted time reading all the emails on this important topic which was not so important for me because I saw your email. The level of Access India has fallen very low. Poor. Moderator will you always remain polite with ridiculous people? Access India is a nice list, I have made many good friends here, but forgiveness will convert it to garbage. Weed out the dead-wood forthwith. On 5/19/14, payal wrote: > Unfounded spouting of venom is really something we can do without on this > list. Unfortunately we don't have any defamation clauses on this list. > A member out of nowhere decides he/she can say whatever they choose about a > member of longstanding repute is not only unfortunate but also uncalled > for. > > I agree with the rest when they say this information should be expunged > with > sufficient action taken against persons like this to ensure name calling > and > venom spouting is kept out. > What Kanchan has done, is known to most on this list here. no action was > taken on an earlier occasion when things were said in unsavoury manner > too. > > > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of Rahul Kelapure > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 10:06 AM > To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues > concerningthe disabled. > Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in > Delhi > judicial services exam > > Strainge it is. > > Kanchan had been composed and civil iin her reply and Kasia is going > on and on for nothing. > > Kasia, if you had any problem with Kanchan, you should have sent her a > private mail instead of writing on the list. You accuse Kanchan of > something on some hearsay and you expect she shouldn't respond to you > on the list? how bizzarre is that. > > I am the testimony as to how Kanchan had helped me and there are so > many others like me I am sure. > > Kasia, you must apologise. > > Harish, please interveen in the matter. > > On 5/19/14, li...@srinivasu.org wrote: >> Kasia, >> I can write at least hundred good things that Kanchan has done and helped >> community inspire legal is her core profession. Can you have point me ten >> good things that you have done to help people on this list. I would > suggest >> ease make best use of the list and if you can't, this is not the right > forum >> for you. >> >> Regards, >> Srinivasu Chakravarthula | PayPal | @csrinivasu >> Sent from my iPhone 5C >> >>> On 19-May-2014, at 6:08, "Kasia" wrote: >>> >>> O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether she's >>> a >>> lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with >>> her >>> fake fantacies. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>> Behalf >>> Of akhilesh >>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM >>> To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>> concerning >>> the disabled. >>> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >>> Delhi >>> judicial services exam >>> >>> Dear Kasia, >>> if you can mind your language please? >>> Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we >>> know >>> it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio >>> udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them >>> without any research. hmm? >>> Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of >>> this list and also of this society. >>> >>>> On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: >>>> I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is >>>> that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan >>>> made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he >>>> didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible >>>> that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her >>>> statement. It would be in public interest if baseless alleg
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Unfounded spouting of venom is really something we can do without on this list. Unfortunately we don't have any defamation clauses on this list. A member out of nowhere decides he/she can say whatever they choose about a member of longstanding repute is not only unfortunate but also uncalled for. I agree with the rest when they say this information should be expunged with sufficient action taken against persons like this to ensure name calling and venom spouting is kept out. What Kanchan has done, is known to most on this list here. no action was taken on an earlier occasion when things were said in unsavoury manner too. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Rahul Kelapure Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 10:06 AM To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Strainge it is. Kanchan had been composed and civil iin her reply and Kasia is going on and on for nothing. Kasia, if you had any problem with Kanchan, you should have sent her a private mail instead of writing on the list. You accuse Kanchan of something on some hearsay and you expect she shouldn't respond to you on the list? how bizzarre is that. I am the testimony as to how Kanchan had helped me and there are so many others like me I am sure. Kasia, you must apologise. Harish, please interveen in the matter. On 5/19/14, li...@srinivasu.org wrote: > Kasia, > I can write at least hundred good things that Kanchan has done and helped > community inspire legal is her core profession. Can you have point me ten > good things that you have done to help people on this list. I would suggest > ease make best use of the list and if you can't, this is not the right forum > for you. > > Regards, > Srinivasu Chakravarthula | PayPal | @csrinivasu > Sent from my iPhone 5C > >> On 19-May-2014, at 6:08, "Kasia" wrote: >> >> O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether she's >> a >> lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with >> her >> fake fantacies. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf >> Of akhilesh >> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM >> To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerning >> the disabled. >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >> Delhi >> judicial services exam >> >> Dear Kasia, >> if you can mind your language please? >> Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we >> know >> it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio >> udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them >> without any research. hmm? >> Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of >> this list and also of this society. >> >>> On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: >>> I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is >>> that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan >>> made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he >>> didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible >>> that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her >>> statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are >>> not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public >>> forum. Looking forward for case citation. >>> >>>> On 5/18/14, Kasia wrote: >>>> I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after >>>> he is sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did >>>> everything which are all for blind. >>>> >>>> I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his >>>> case at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting >>>> positive judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my >>>> ears over the phone at present. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>>> Behalf Of KanchanPamnani >>>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM >>>> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>>> concerning the disabled.' >>>> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required i
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Please stop this deprecative and unwarranted assertions against respected member of this list. . These allegations are capricious and personally motivated. I simply asked for any legal assistance, for which she came out and offered her help. If members use such derogatory language against those persons who are coming forward to help us, who will do so in future? Yes I was also little bit surprised when she wrote that she doesn't agree with my first point! but believe me she opined in a very practical way, these are the arguments which are raised inside the courtroom during argumentation with opposite parties. A lawyer has to take into consideration the arguments which may be raised by opponent. I remember when I was arguing once in Delhi High Court, against UGC in one of my own case, I argued that this condition was never mentioned in application form nor in advertisement, Honorable Justice Kelash Gambhir replied to me that each and every thing can not be written in advertisement! So no personal allegations. On 5/19/14, Ajay Minocha wrote: > Hi Kasia, > Despite abusing a very respectable member, you haven't sighted any > solid situation so that anybuddy can believe you. > People like you have nothing to do except spilling garbedge on public > platforms. > according to me, such kind of members are unacceptable on public platforms. > Thanks, > Ajay > > On 5/19/14, Rahul Kelapure wrote: >> Strainge it is. >> >> Kanchan had been composed and civil iin her reply and Kasia is going >> on and on for nothing. >> >> Kasia, if you had any problem with Kanchan, you should have sent her a >> private mail instead of writing on the list. You accuse Kanchan of >> something on some hearsay and you expect she shouldn't respond to you >> on the list? how bizzarre is that. >> >> I am the testimony as to how Kanchan had helped me and there are so >> many others like me I am sure. >> >> Kasia, you must apologise. >> >> Harish, please interveen in the matter. >> >> On 5/19/14, li...@srinivasu.org wrote: >>> Kasia, >>> I can write at least hundred good things that Kanchan has done and >>> helped >>> community inspire legal is her core profession. Can you have point me >>> ten >>> good things that you have done to help people on this list. I would >>> suggest >>> ease make best use of the list and if you can't, this is not the right >>> forum >>> for you. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Srinivasu Chakravarthula | PayPal | @csrinivasu >>> Sent from my iPhone 5C >>> >>>> On 19-May-2014, at 6:08, "Kasia" wrote: >>>> >>>> O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether >>>> she's >>>> a >>>> lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with >>>> her >>>> fake fantacies. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>>> Behalf >>>> Of akhilesh >>>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM >>>> To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>>> concerning >>>> the disabled. >>>> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >>>> Delhi >>>> judicial services exam >>>> >>>> Dear Kasia, >>>> if you can mind your language please? >>>> Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we >>>> know >>>> it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from >>>> Radio >>>> udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them >>>> without any research. hmm? >>>> Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member >>>> of >>>> this list and also of this society. >>>> >>>>> On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: >>>>> I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is >>>>> that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan >>>>> made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he >>>>> didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible >>>>> that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her >>>>> statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are >>>>> not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public &
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Hi Kasia, Despite abusing a very respectable member, you haven't sighted any solid situation so that anybuddy can believe you. People like you have nothing to do except spilling garbedge on public platforms. according to me, such kind of members are unacceptable on public platforms. Thanks, Ajay On 5/19/14, Rahul Kelapure wrote: > Strainge it is. > > Kanchan had been composed and civil iin her reply and Kasia is going > on and on for nothing. > > Kasia, if you had any problem with Kanchan, you should have sent her a > private mail instead of writing on the list. You accuse Kanchan of > something on some hearsay and you expect she shouldn't respond to you > on the list? how bizzarre is that. > > I am the testimony as to how Kanchan had helped me and there are so > many others like me I am sure. > > Kasia, you must apologise. > > Harish, please interveen in the matter. > > On 5/19/14, li...@srinivasu.org wrote: >> Kasia, >> I can write at least hundred good things that Kanchan has done and helped >> community inspire legal is her core profession. Can you have point me ten >> good things that you have done to help people on this list. I would >> suggest >> ease make best use of the list and if you can't, this is not the right >> forum >> for you. >> >> Regards, >> Srinivasu Chakravarthula | PayPal | @csrinivasu >> Sent from my iPhone 5C >> >>> On 19-May-2014, at 6:08, "Kasia" wrote: >>> >>> O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether she's >>> a >>> lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with >>> her >>> fake fantacies. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>> Behalf >>> Of akhilesh >>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM >>> To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>> concerning >>> the disabled. >>> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >>> Delhi >>> judicial services exam >>> >>> Dear Kasia, >>> if you can mind your language please? >>> Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we >>> know >>> it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio >>> udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them >>> without any research. hmm? >>> Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of >>> this list and also of this society. >>> >>>> On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: >>>> I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is >>>> that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan >>>> made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he >>>> didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible >>>> that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her >>>> statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are >>>> not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public >>>> forum. Looking forward for case citation. >>>> >>>>> On 5/18/14, Kasia wrote: >>>>> I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after >>>>> he is sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did >>>>> everything which are all for blind. >>>>> >>>>> I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his >>>>> case at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting >>>>> positive judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my >>>>> ears over the phone at present. >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>>>> Behalf Of KanchanPamnani >>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM >>>>> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>>>> concerning the disabled.' >>>>> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter >>>>> in Delhi judicial services exam >>>>> >>>>> What is the date of this judgement? What is the date of the circular? >>>>> What >>>>> is the representation that was submitt
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
I am sure the list rules clearly define in unequivocal terms as to what can be discussed here. Personal accusations & maligning a fellow advocate committed to disability rights is uncalled for on a public list like this for I personally know Kanchan well. Stop this right away and we request the moderator to expunge the defamatory mails from the list archives and reprimand the defaulter. Regds SC Vashishth Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone -Original Message- From: Rahul Kelapure Sender: "AccessIndia" Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 10:06:03 To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled. Reply-To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled." Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Strainge it is. Kanchan had been composed and civil iin her reply and Kasia is going on and on for nothing. Kasia, if you had any problem with Kanchan, you should have sent her a private mail instead of writing on the list. You accuse Kanchan of something on some hearsay and you expect she shouldn't respond to you on the list? how bizzarre is that. I am the testimony as to how Kanchan had helped me and there are so many others like me I am sure. Kasia, you must apologise. Harish, please interveen in the matter. On 5/19/14, li...@srinivasu.org wrote: > Kasia, > I can write at least hundred good things that Kanchan has done and helped > community inspire legal is her core profession. Can you have point me ten > good things that you have done to help people on this list. I would suggest > ease make best use of the list and if you can't, this is not the right forum > for you. > > Regards, > Srinivasu Chakravarthula | PayPal | @csrinivasu > Sent from my iPhone 5C > >> On 19-May-2014, at 6:08, "Kasia" wrote: >> >> O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether she's >> a >> lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with >> her >> fake fantacies. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf >> Of akhilesh >> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM >> To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerning >> the disabled. >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >> Delhi >> judicial services exam >> >> Dear Kasia, >> if you can mind your language please? >> Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we >> know >> it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio >> udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them >> without any research. hmm? >> Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of >> this list and also of this society. >> >>> On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: >>> I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is >>> that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan >>> made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he >>> didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible >>> that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her >>> statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are >>> not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public >>> forum. Looking forward for case citation. >>> >>>> On 5/18/14, Kasia wrote: >>>> I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after >>>> he is sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did >>>> everything which are all for blind. >>>> >>>> I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his >>>> case at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting >>>> positive judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my >>>> ears over the phone at present. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>>> Behalf Of KanchanPamnani >>>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM >>>> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>>> concerning the disabled.' >>>> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter >>>> in Delhi judicial services exam >>>> >>&g
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Strainge it is. Kanchan had been composed and civil iin her reply and Kasia is going on and on for nothing. Kasia, if you had any problem with Kanchan, you should have sent her a private mail instead of writing on the list. You accuse Kanchan of something on some hearsay and you expect she shouldn't respond to you on the list? how bizzarre is that. I am the testimony as to how Kanchan had helped me and there are so many others like me I am sure. Kasia, you must apologise. Harish, please interveen in the matter. On 5/19/14, li...@srinivasu.org wrote: > Kasia, > I can write at least hundred good things that Kanchan has done and helped > community inspire legal is her core profession. Can you have point me ten > good things that you have done to help people on this list. I would suggest > ease make best use of the list and if you can't, this is not the right forum > for you. > > Regards, > Srinivasu Chakravarthula | PayPal | @csrinivasu > Sent from my iPhone 5C > >> On 19-May-2014, at 6:08, "Kasia" wrote: >> >> O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether she's >> a >> lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with >> her >> fake fantacies. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf >> Of akhilesh >> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM >> To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerning >> the disabled. >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >> Delhi >> judicial services exam >> >> Dear Kasia, >> if you can mind your language please? >> Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we >> know >> it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio >> udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them >> without any research. hmm? >> Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of >> this list and also of this society. >> >>> On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: >>> I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is >>> that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan >>> made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he >>> didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible >>> that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her >>> statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are >>> not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public >>> forum. Looking forward for case citation. >>> >>>> On 5/18/14, Kasia wrote: >>>> I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after >>>> he is sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did >>>> everything which are all for blind. >>>> >>>> I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his >>>> case at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting >>>> positive judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my >>>> ears over the phone at present. >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>>> Behalf Of KanchanPamnani >>>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM >>>> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>>> concerning the disabled.' >>>> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter >>>> in Delhi judicial services exam >>>> >>>> What is the date of this judgement? What is the date of the circular? >>>> What >>>> is the representation that was submitted? Who wrote the representation? >>>> Who >>>> went to discuss the matter and sorted it out?What has been referred >>>> to by NSDL-please check your facts and also ask your friend as to who >>>> helped his lawyer? Why did your friend not follow his case to its >>>> logical conclusion? >>>> Why he didn't share it with Accessindia? >>>> Just go back to emails of 2007 if you really want to confirm. Please >>>> don't believe me if you don't trust me but don't believe everyone >>>> else without facts. >>>> I can only say that 22 organisations working with he visually >>>> challenged si
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Kasia, I can write at least hundred good things that Kanchan has done and helped community inspire legal is her core profession. Can you have point me ten good things that you have done to help people on this list. I would suggest ease make best use of the list and if you can't, this is not the right forum for you. Regards, Srinivasu Chakravarthula | PayPal | @csrinivasu Sent from my iPhone 5C > On 19-May-2014, at 6:08, "Kasia" wrote: > > O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether she's a > lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with her > fake fantacies. > > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of akhilesh > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM > To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning > the disabled. > Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi > judicial services exam > > Dear Kasia, > if you can mind your language please? > Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we know > it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio > udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them > without any research. hmm? > Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of > this list and also of this society. > >> On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: >> I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is >> that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan >> made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he >> didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible >> that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her >> statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are >> not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public >> forum. Looking forward for case citation. >> >>> On 5/18/14, Kasia wrote: >>> I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after >>> he is sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did >>> everything which are all for blind. >>> >>> I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his >>> case at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting >>> positive judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my >>> ears over the phone at present. >>> >>> -Original Message----- >>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>> Behalf Of KanchanPamnani >>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM >>> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>> concerning the disabled.' >>> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter >>> in Delhi judicial services exam >>> >>> What is the date of this judgement? What is the date of the circular? >>> What >>> is the representation that was submitted? Who wrote the representation? >>> Who >>> went to discuss the matter and sorted it out?What has been referred >>> to by NSDL-please check your facts and also ask your friend as to who >>> helped his lawyer? Why did your friend not follow his case to its >>> logical conclusion? >>> Why he didn't share it with Accessindia? >>> Just go back to emails of 2007 if you really want to confirm. Please >>> don't believe me if you don't trust me but don't believe everyone >>> else without facts. >>> I can only say that 22 organisations working with he visually >>> challenged signed the representation. Everyone on accessindia helped >>> with their suggestions so it is always a group effort.XRCVC folloed >>> up and compiled the documents. I took the lead mainly because of the >>> complaints that I had read on accessindia and also because of your >>> friend. I have always shared my information of this forum. >>> Sorry I cant continue this discussion until next weekend. My request >>> to you is that you should get your facts in order before accusing >>> anyone. >>> Kanchan >>> -Original Message- >>> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >>> Behalf Of Kasia >>> Sent: 18 May 2014 14:33 >>> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >>> concerning the disabled.' >>
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
This kind of writing on the list is not acceptable. Harish! please intervene. An apology is in order. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 19 May 2014 06:08 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether she's a lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with her fake fantacies. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of akhilesh Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Dear Kasia, if you can mind your language please? Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we know it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them without any research. hmm? Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of this list and also of this society. On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: > I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is > that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan > made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he > didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible > that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her > statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are > not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public > forum. Looking forward for case citation. > > On 5/18/14, Kasia wrote: >> I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after >> he is sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did >> everything which are all for blind. >> >> I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his >> case at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting >> positive judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my >> ears over the phone at present. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf Of KanchanPamnani >> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM >> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerning the disabled.' >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter >> in Delhi judicial services exam >> >> What is the date of this judgement? What is the date of the circular? >> What >> is the representation that was submitted? Who wrote the representation? >> Who >> went to discuss the matter and sorted it out?What has been referred >> to by NSDL-please check your facts and also ask your friend as to who >> helped his lawyer? Why did your friend not follow his case to its >> logical conclusion? >> Why he didn't share it with Accessindia? >> Just go back to emails of 2007 if you really want to confirm. Please >> don't believe me if you don't trust me but don't believe everyone >> else without facts. >> I can only say that 22 organisations working with he visually >> challenged signed the representation. Everyone on accessindia helped >> with their suggestions so it is always a group effort.XRCVC folloed >> up and compiled the documents. I took the lead mainly because of the >> complaints that I had read on accessindia and also because of your >> friend. I have always shared my information of this forum. >> Sorry I cant continue this discussion until next weekend. My request >> to you is that you should get your facts in order before accusing >> anyone. >> Kanchan >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf Of Kasia >> Sent: 18 May 2014 14:33 >> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerning the disabled.' >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter >> in Delhi judicial services exam >> >> O dear. I guess you're much talented in interpretating my >> suggestions. I was asking you to offer your support to that fellow in >> private if you don't want others' intervensions. >> >> While sending this email
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
O wow, backing up? Do whatever you like. But analyse first whether she's a lawyer or a liar. She may be a famous person as per this list. But with her fake fantacies. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of akhilesh Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:54 AM To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Dear Kasia, if you can mind your language please? Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we know it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them without any research. hmm? Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of this list and also of this society. On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: > I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is > that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan > made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he > didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible > that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her > statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are > not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public > forum. Looking forward for case citation. > > On 5/18/14, Kasia wrote: >> I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after >> he is sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did >> everything which are all for blind. >> >> I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his >> case at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting >> positive judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my >> ears over the phone at present. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf Of KanchanPamnani >> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM >> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerning the disabled.' >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter >> in Delhi judicial services exam >> >> What is the date of this judgement? What is the date of the circular? >> What >> is the representation that was submitted? Who wrote the representation? >> Who >> went to discuss the matter and sorted it out?What has been referred >> to by NSDL-please check your facts and also ask your friend as to who >> helped his lawyer? Why did your friend not follow his case to its >> logical conclusion? >> Why he didn't share it with Accessindia? >> Just go back to emails of 2007 if you really want to confirm. Please >> don't believe me if you don't trust me but don't believe everyone >> else without facts. >> I can only say that 22 organisations working with he visually >> challenged signed the representation. Everyone on accessindia helped >> with their suggestions so it is always a group effort.XRCVC folloed >> up and compiled the documents. I took the lead mainly because of the >> complaints that I had read on accessindia and also because of your >> friend. I have always shared my information of this forum. >> Sorry I cant continue this discussion until next weekend. My request >> to you is that you should get your facts in order before accusing >> anyone. >> Kanchan >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf Of Kasia >> Sent: 18 May 2014 14:33 >> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerning the disabled.' >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter >> in Delhi judicial services exam >> >> O dear. I guess you're much talented in interpretating my >> suggestions. I was asking you to offer your support to that fellow in >> private if you don't want others' intervensions. >> >> While sending this email, I got one more evidence from one of the >> colleagues from United India Insurance Company. He was telling the >> same. As you wanted to gain name for the things which was not even >> done by you. He said he was asking suggestion for his case against >> NSDL who they were not accepting blind customers and you were >> neglecting it at the beginning and after he's obtaining a judgement >> fr
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Dear Kasia, if you can mind your language please? Advocate kanchan pamnani has contributed a lot for this society, and we know it well and experienced it first hand. Some vested interests from Radio udaan have blabbering about her on the list and you have believe them without any research. hmm? Learn to talk first and then comment.. she is the respectable member of this list and also of this society. On 5/18/14, Arjun Malhotra wrote: > I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is > that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan > made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he > didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible > that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her > statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are > not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public > forum. Looking forward for case citation. > > On 5/18/14, Kasia wrote: >> I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after he >> is >> sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did everything >> which are all for blind. >> >> I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his >> case >> at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting positive >> judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my ears over >> the >> phone at present. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf >> Of KanchanPamnani >> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM >> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerning >> the disabled.' >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >> Delhi >> judicial services exam >> >> What is the date of this judgement? What is the date of the circular? >> What >> is the representation that was submitted? Who wrote the representation? >> Who >> went to discuss the matter and sorted it out?What has been referred to by >> NSDL-please check your facts and also ask your friend as to who helped >> his >> lawyer? Why did your friend not follow his case to its logical >> conclusion? >> Why he didn't share it with Accessindia? >> Just go back to emails of 2007 if you really want to confirm. Please >> don't >> believe me if you don't trust me but don't believe everyone else without >> facts. >> I can only say that 22 organisations working with he visually challenged >> signed the representation. Everyone on accessindia helped with their >> suggestions so it is always a group effort.XRCVC folloed up and compiled >> the >> documents. I took the lead mainly because of the complaints that I had >> read >> on accessindia and also because of your friend. I have always shared my >> information of this forum. >> Sorry I cant continue this discussion until next weekend. My request to >> you >> is that you should get your facts in order before accusing anyone. >> Kanchan >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf >> Of Kasia >> Sent: 18 May 2014 14:33 >> To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues >> concerning >> the disabled.' >> Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in >> Delhi >> judicial services exam >> >> O dear. I guess you're much talented in interpretating my suggestions. I >> was >> asking you to offer your support to that fellow in private if you don't >> want >> others' intervensions. >> >> While sending this email, I got one more evidence from one of the >> colleagues >> from United India Insurance Company. He was telling the same. As you >> wanted >> to gain name for the things which was not even done by you. He said he >> was >> asking suggestion for his case against NSDL who they were not accepting >> blind customers and you were neglecting it at the beginning and after >> he's >> obtaining a judgement from the Chennai Highcourt, you were asking the >> judgement and you advertised as you fought for that and got it. >> >> So stop bullying please. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On >> Behalf >> Of KanchanPamnani >> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:26 PM >> To: &#x
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
I'm wondering where is the moderator of the list? My suggestion is that don't go for heresay thingies. The person who accused Kanchan made a statement on a radio, which is not to be relied upon as he didn't have any solid evidence to support it. It might be possible that Kanchan Pamnani said something else and he tainted the her statement. It would be in public interest if baseless allegations are not to be relied upon. You are trying to defame someone on this public forum. Looking forward for case citation. On 5/18/14, Kasia wrote: > I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after he is > sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did everything > which are all for blind. > > I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his case > at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting positive > judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my ears over the > phone at present. > > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of KanchanPamnani > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM > To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning > the disabled.' > Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in > Delhi > judicial services exam > > What is the date of this judgement? What is the date of the circular? What > is the representation that was submitted? Who wrote the representation? Who > went to discuss the matter and sorted it out?What has been referred to by > NSDL-please check your facts and also ask your friend as to who helped his > lawyer? Why did your friend not follow his case to its logical conclusion? > Why he didn't share it with Accessindia? > Just go back to emails of 2007 if you really want to confirm. Please don't > believe me if you don't trust me but don't believe everyone else without > facts. > I can only say that 22 organisations working with he visually challenged > signed the representation. Everyone on accessindia helped with their > suggestions so it is always a group effort.XRCVC folloed up and compiled > the > documents. I took the lead mainly because of the complaints that I had read > on accessindia and also because of your friend. I have always shared my > information of this forum. > Sorry I cant continue this discussion until next weekend. My request to you > is that you should get your facts in order before accusing anyone. > Kanchan > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of Kasia > Sent: 18 May 2014 14:33 > To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning > the disabled.' > Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in > Delhi > judicial services exam > > O dear. I guess you're much talented in interpretating my suggestions. I > was > asking you to offer your support to that fellow in private if you don't > want > others' intervensions. > > While sending this email, I got one more evidence from one of the > colleagues > from United India Insurance Company. He was telling the same. As you wanted > to gain name for the things which was not even done by you. He said he was > asking suggestion for his case against NSDL who they were not accepting > blind customers and you were neglecting it at the beginning and after he's > obtaining a judgement from the Chennai Highcourt, you were asking the > judgement and you advertised as you fought for that and got it. > > So stop bullying please. > > -----Original Message----- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of KanchanPamnani > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:26 PM > To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning > the disabled.' > Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in > Delhi > judicial services exam > > Its really strange that you write to me in a public forum calling me names > and you expect me to respond to you directly. > > Also I am once again requesting you to read archives-I reply only on > Sundays > and that too if I am at home. Now I will have to go ogg line and attend to > other matters. I will not be able to check my emails for a week. > Why are you calling me a liar. I am being civil to you. Kindly explain your > statement and if you think that I really am a liar then please tell me what > I have lied to you about. > I normally get into trouble because of my frankness but this is the first > time I have been accused of being a liar. > Kanchan > -Orig
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
I can even give you the case number and every details tomorrow after he is sending it to me. But don't make fus as you were the one did everything which are all for blind. I can prove that tomorrow via this list. As how you were ignoring his case at the beginning and how you've gained name after he is getting positive judgement from the high court, Chennai. I'm having him on my ears over the phone at present. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:47 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam What is the date of this judgement? What is the date of the circular? What is the representation that was submitted? Who wrote the representation? Who went to discuss the matter and sorted it out?What has been referred to by NSDL-please check your facts and also ask your friend as to who helped his lawyer? Why did your friend not follow his case to its logical conclusion? Why he didn't share it with Accessindia? Just go back to emails of 2007 if you really want to confirm. Please don't believe me if you don't trust me but don't believe everyone else without facts. I can only say that 22 organisations working with he visually challenged signed the representation. Everyone on accessindia helped with their suggestions so it is always a group effort.XRCVC folloed up and compiled the documents. I took the lead mainly because of the complaints that I had read on accessindia and also because of your friend. I have always shared my information of this forum. Sorry I cant continue this discussion until next weekend. My request to you is that you should get your facts in order before accusing anyone. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 14:33 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam O dear. I guess you're much talented in interpretating my suggestions. I was asking you to offer your support to that fellow in private if you don't want others' intervensions. While sending this email, I got one more evidence from one of the colleagues from United India Insurance Company. He was telling the same. As you wanted to gain name for the things which was not even done by you. He said he was asking suggestion for his case against NSDL who they were not accepting blind customers and you were neglecting it at the beginning and after he's obtaining a judgement from the Chennai Highcourt, you were asking the judgement and you advertised as you fought for that and got it. So stop bullying please. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:26 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Its really strange that you write to me in a public forum calling me names and you expect me to respond to you directly. Also I am once again requesting you to read archives-I reply only on Sundays and that too if I am at home. Now I will have to go ogg line and attend to other matters. I will not be able to check my emails for a week. Why are you calling me a liar. I am being civil to you. Kindly explain your statement and if you think that I really am a liar then please tell me what I have lied to you about. I normally get into trouble because of my frankness but this is the first time I have been accused of being a liar. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 14:18 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Your insteant replies and way of writing making sure that you got more time with your fingers and also how much short tempered person you are. If you wana convey something to someone in particular, why don't you send an email privately to that person instead of sending it in publicks and asking everyone not to intervene in that subject? Be a lawyer, and not a liar. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:14 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re:
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
What is the date of this judgement? What is the date of the circular? What is the representation that was submitted? Who wrote the representation? Who went to discuss the matter and sorted it out?What has been referred to by NSDL-please check your facts and also ask your friend as to who helped his lawyer? Why did your friend not follow his case to its logical conclusion? Why he didn't share it with Accessindia? Just go back to emails of 2007 if you really want to confirm. Please don't believe me if you don't trust me but don't believe everyone else without facts. I can only say that 22 organisations working with he visually challenged signed the representation. Everyone on accessindia helped with their suggestions so it is always a group effort.XRCVC folloed up and compiled the documents. I took the lead mainly because of the complaints that I had read on accessindia and also because of your friend. I have always shared my information of this forum. Sorry I cant continue this discussion until next weekend. My request to you is that you should get your facts in order before accusing anyone. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 14:33 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam O dear. I guess you're much talented in interpretating my suggestions. I was asking you to offer your support to that fellow in private if you don't want others' intervensions. While sending this email, I got one more evidence from one of the colleagues from United India Insurance Company. He was telling the same. As you wanted to gain name for the things which was not even done by you. He said he was asking suggestion for his case against NSDL who they were not accepting blind customers and you were neglecting it at the beginning and after he's obtaining a judgement from the Chennai Highcourt, you were asking the judgement and you advertised as you fought for that and got it. So stop bullying please. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:26 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Its really strange that you write to me in a public forum calling me names and you expect me to respond to you directly. Also I am once again requesting you to read archives-I reply only on Sundays and that too if I am at home. Now I will have to go ogg line and attend to other matters. I will not be able to check my emails for a week. Why are you calling me a liar. I am being civil to you. Kindly explain your statement and if you think that I really am a liar then please tell me what I have lied to you about. I normally get into trouble because of my frankness but this is the first time I have been accused of being a liar. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 14:18 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Your insteant replies and way of writing making sure that you got more time with your fingers and also how much short tempered person you are. If you wana convey something to someone in particular, why don't you send an email privately to that person instead of sending it in publicks and asking everyone not to intervene in that subject? Be a lawyer, and not a liar. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:14 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I am not getting short tempered. If I was really short tempered I would have gone off this list and never responded to serious emails. I wish people like you would read the archives and get to know the truth without which you should not comment. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 13:35 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Don't get pissed off madam. I was just telling you the fact which I read it from the same list a coup
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
O dear. I guess you're much talented in interpretating my suggestions. I was asking you to offer your support to that fellow in private if you don't want others' intervensions. While sending this email, I got one more evidence from one of the colleagues from United India Insurance Company. He was telling the same. As you wanted to gain name for the things which was not even done by you. He said he was asking suggestion for his case against NSDL who they were not accepting blind customers and you were neglecting it at the beginning and after he's obtaining a judgement from the Chennai Highcourt, you were asking the judgement and you advertised as you fought for that and got it. So stop bullying please. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:26 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Its really strange that you write to me in a public forum calling me names and you expect me to respond to you directly. Also I am once again requesting you to read archives-I reply only on Sundays and that too if I am at home. Now I will have to go ogg line and attend to other matters. I will not be able to check my emails for a week. Why are you calling me a liar. I am being civil to you. Kindly explain your statement and if you think that I really am a liar then please tell me what I have lied to you about. I normally get into trouble because of my frankness but this is the first time I have been accused of being a liar. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 14:18 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Your insteant replies and way of writing making sure that you got more time with your fingers and also how much short tempered person you are. If you wana convey something to someone in particular, why don't you send an email privately to that person instead of sending it in publicks and asking everyone not to intervene in that subject? Be a lawyer, and not a liar. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:14 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I am not getting short tempered. If I was really short tempered I would have gone off this list and never responded to serious emails. I wish people like you would read the archives and get to know the truth without which you should not comment. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 13:35 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Don't get pissed off madam. I was just telling you the fact which I read it from the same list a couple of week before. I was trying to safeguard you. Blindies have more expectitions and of course that includes myself too. If you're really willing to help, you won't get pissed off. Don't be a short tempered lawyer. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:11 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I cannot help him in the sense that you assume I should because I am in Mumbai and not in Delhi. If you don't want to read my emails-kindly delete them. If I am two faced then you better not get in touch with me. If you don't know me and my work then please read accessindia's archives instead of believing others. On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Just for your information it is the guidelines that I have fought for and won for the country from 2006. Everyone on thelist barring a few new comers like you knowabout my work and how it all started. Get yourself educated. Always listen to two sides-you heard how two faced I am but did you check with me, you believed how mature is that. Kanchan -Original Message- F
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Its really strange that you write to me in a public forum calling me names and you expect me to respond to you directly. Also I am once again requesting you to read archives-I reply only on Sundays and that too if I am at home. Now I will have to go ogg line and attend to other matters. I will not be able to check my emails for a week. Why are you calling me a liar. I am being civil to you. Kindly explain your statement and if you think that I really am a liar then please tell me what I have lied to you about. I normally get into trouble because of my frankness but this is the first time I have been accused of being a liar. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 14:18 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Your insteant replies and way of writing making sure that you got more time with your fingers and also how much short tempered person you are. If you wana convey something to someone in particular, why don't you send an email privately to that person instead of sending it in publicks and asking everyone not to intervene in that subject? Be a lawyer, and not a liar. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:14 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I am not getting short tempered. If I was really short tempered I would have gone off this list and never responded to serious emails. I wish people like you would read the archives and get to know the truth without which you should not comment. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 13:35 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Don't get pissed off madam. I was just telling you the fact which I read it from the same list a couple of week before. I was trying to safeguard you. Blindies have more expectitions and of course that includes myself too. If you're really willing to help, you won't get pissed off. Don't be a short tempered lawyer. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:11 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I cannot help him in the sense that you assume I should because I am in Mumbai and not in Delhi. If you don't want to read my emails-kindly delete them. If I am two faced then you better not get in touch with me. If you don't know me and my work then please read accessindia's archives instead of believing others. On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Just for your information it is the guidelines that I have fought for and won for the country from 2006. Everyone on thelist barring a few new comers like you knowabout my work and how it all started. Get yourself educated. Always listen to two sides-you heard how two faced I am but did you check with me, you believed how mature is that. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 12:40 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I kindly request you to intervene in this matter only if you're willing to support up to the end. I'm telling this because, if I remember correct, I've read an email telling that you're being a two faced person in accessindia a couple of weeks before. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:18 AM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challe
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Your insteant replies and way of writing making sure that you got more time with your fingers and also how much short tempered person you are. If you wana convey something to someone in particular, why don't you send an email privately to that person instead of sending it in publicks and asking everyone not to intervene in that subject? Be a lawyer, and not a liar. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:14 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I am not getting short tempered. If I was really short tempered I would have gone off this list and never responded to serious emails. I wish people like you would read the archives and get to know the truth without which you should not comment. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 13:35 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Don't get pissed off madam. I was just telling you the fact which I read it from the same list a couple of week before. I was trying to safeguard you. Blindies have more expectitions and of course that includes myself too. If you're really willing to help, you won't get pissed off. Don't be a short tempered lawyer. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:11 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I cannot help him in the sense that you assume I should because I am in Mumbai and not in Delhi. If you don't want to read my emails-kindly delete them. If I am two faced then you better not get in touch with me. If you don't know me and my work then please read accessindia's archives instead of believing others. On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Just for your information it is the guidelines that I have fought for and won for the country from 2006. Everyone on thelist barring a few new comers like you knowabout my work and how it all started. Get yourself educated. Always listen to two sides-you heard how two faced I am but did you check with me, you believed how mature is that. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 12:40 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I kindly request you to intervene in this matter only if you're willing to support up to the end. I'm telling this because, if I remember correct, I've read an email telling that you're being a two faced person in accessindia a couple of weeks before. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:18 AM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challenge? Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 To: accessindia Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
I am not getting short tempered. If I was really short tempered I would have gone off this list and never responded to serious emails. I wish people like you would read the archives and get to know the truth without which you should not comment. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 13:35 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Don't get pissed off madam. I was just telling you the fact which I read it from the same list a couple of week before. I was trying to safeguard you. Blindies have more expectitions and of course that includes myself too. If you're really willing to help, you won't get pissed off. Don't be a short tempered lawyer. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:11 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I cannot help him in the sense that you assume I should because I am in Mumbai and not in Delhi. If you don't want to read my emails-kindly delete them. If I am two faced then you better not get in touch with me. If you don't know me and my work then please read accessindia's archives instead of believing others. On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Just for your information it is the guidelines that I have fought for and won for the country from 2006. Everyone on thelist barring a few new comers like you knowabout my work and how it all started. Get yourself educated. Always listen to two sides-you heard how two faced I am but did you check with me, you believed how mature is that. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 12:40 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I kindly request you to intervene in this matter only if you're willing to support up to the end. I'm telling this because, if I remember correct, I've read an email telling that you're being a two faced person in accessindia a couple of weeks before. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:18 AM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challenge? Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 To: accessindia Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of nonreceipt thereof, it shall be p
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Is that a sarcasm? -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:10 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Sorry -read my email I have never asked anyone to shut up as you have stated.Please read my email again to understand what I have said to you. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 13:36 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam By the way, if you're sending it to the list in publicks, you cannot ask someone to shut up. Keep that in mind as a lawyer. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:11 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I cannot help him in the sense that you assume I should because I am in Mumbai and not in Delhi. If you don't want to read my emails-kindly delete them. If I am two faced then you better not get in touch with me. If you don't know me and my work then please read accessindia's archives instead of believing others. On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Just for your information it is the guidelines that I have fought for and won for the country from 2006. Everyone on thelist barring a few new comers like you knowabout my work and how it all started. Get yourself educated. Always listen to two sides-you heard how two faced I am but did you check with me, you believed how mature is that. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 12:40 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I kindly request you to intervene in this matter only if you're willing to support up to the end. I'm telling this because, if I remember correct, I've read an email telling that you're being a two faced person in accessindia a couple of weeks before. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:18 AM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challenge? Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 To: accessindia Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe is not a graduate / post-graduate in
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Sorry -read my email I have never asked anyone to shut up as you have stated.Please read my email again to understand what I have said to you. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 13:36 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam By the way, if you're sending it to the list in publicks, you cannot ask someone to shut up. Keep that in mind as a lawyer. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:11 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I cannot help him in the sense that you assume I should because I am in Mumbai and not in Delhi. If you don't want to read my emails-kindly delete them. If I am two faced then you better not get in touch with me. If you don't know me and my work then please read accessindia's archives instead of believing others. On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Just for your information it is the guidelines that I have fought for and won for the country from 2006. Everyone on thelist barring a few new comers like you knowabout my work and how it all started. Get yourself educated. Always listen to two sides-you heard how two faced I am but did you check with me, you believed how mature is that. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 12:40 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I kindly request you to intervene in this matter only if you're willing to support up to the end. I'm telling this because, if I remember correct, I've read an email telling that you're being a two faced person in accessindia a couple of weeks before. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:18 AM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challenge? Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 To: accessindia Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on the date of the Examination. Yours faithfully, (Manish Aggarwal) Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" Respected members, these condition
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
By the way, if you're sending it to the list in publicks, you cannot ask someone to shut up. Keep that in mind as a lawyer. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:11 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I cannot help him in the sense that you assume I should because I am in Mumbai and not in Delhi. If you don't want to read my emails-kindly delete them. If I am two faced then you better not get in touch with me. If you don't know me and my work then please read accessindia's archives instead of believing others. On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Just for your information it is the guidelines that I have fought for and won for the country from 2006. Everyone on thelist barring a few new comers like you knowabout my work and how it all started. Get yourself educated. Always listen to two sides-you heard how two faced I am but did you check with me, you believed how mature is that. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 12:40 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I kindly request you to intervene in this matter only if you're willing to support up to the end. I'm telling this because, if I remember correct, I've read an email telling that you're being a two faced person in accessindia a couple of weeks before. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:18 AM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challenge? Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 To: accessindia Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on the date of the Examination. Yours faithfully, (Manish Aggarwal) Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" Respected members, these conditions are clearly contradictory to MSJE guidelines. In case I am bringing my own scribe, before one week of exam how can I ensure that I will bring such and such person? Some time it is dependent upon the availability of the person and sometime it is decided only one day ahead of the examination that who will be my scribe. Here its very problematic to supply the details of the scribe, indirectly they are again pushing us to accept their scribe who are not even know how to read questions properl
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Don't get pissed off madam. I was just telling you the fact which I read it from the same list a couple of week before. I was trying to safeguard you. Blindies have more expectitions and of course that includes myself too. If you're really willing to help, you won't get pissed off. Don't be a short tempered lawyer. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:11 PM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I cannot help him in the sense that you assume I should because I am in Mumbai and not in Delhi. If you don't want to read my emails-kindly delete them. If I am two faced then you better not get in touch with me. If you don't know me and my work then please read accessindia's archives instead of believing others. On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Just for your information it is the guidelines that I have fought for and won for the country from 2006. Everyone on thelist barring a few new comers like you knowabout my work and how it all started. Get yourself educated. Always listen to two sides-you heard how two faced I am but did you check with me, you believed how mature is that. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 12:40 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I kindly request you to intervene in this matter only if you're willing to support up to the end. I'm telling this because, if I remember correct, I've read an email telling that you're being a two faced person in accessindia a couple of weeks before. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:18 AM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challenge? Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 To: accessindia Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on the date of the Examination. Yours faithfully, (Manish Aggarwal) Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" Respected members, these conditions are clearly contradictory to MSJE guidelines. In case I am bringing my own scribe, before one week of exam how can I ensure that I will bring such and such person? Some time it is dependent upon the availability of the person and sometime it is decided only one day ahead of the e
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
I cannot help him in the sense that you assume I should because I am in Mumbai and not in Delhi. If you don't want to read my emails-kindly delete them. If I am two faced then you better not get in touch with me. If you don't know me and my work then please read accessindia's archives instead of believing others. On this topic I have been in touch with the person concerned and I am trying to sort it out so please if you have nothing to contribute stay out of the conversation. Just for your information it is the guidelines that I have fought for and won for the country from 2006. Everyone on thelist barring a few new comers like you knowabout my work and how it all started. Get yourself educated. Always listen to two sides-you heard how two faced I am but did you check with me, you believed how mature is that. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kasia Sent: 18 May 2014 12:40 To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam I kindly request you to intervene in this matter only if you're willing to support up to the end. I'm telling this because, if I remember correct, I've read an email telling that you're being a two faced person in accessindia a couple of weeks before. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:18 AM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challenge? Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 To: accessindia Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on the date of the Examination. Yours faithfully, (Manish Aggarwal) Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" Respected members, these conditions are clearly contradictory to MSJE guidelines. In case I am bringing my own scribe, before one week of exam how can I ensure that I will bring such and such person? Some time it is dependent upon the availability of the person and sometime it is decided only one day ahead of the examination that who will be my scribe. Here its very problematic to supply the details of the scribe, indirectly they are again pushing us to accept their scribe who are not even know how to read questions properly. I want to know whether any humanright agency, any advocate on the list can help us to file a petition on the behalf of candidates? If I will go personally, it will take time and this precious time for the preparation of the exam will be wested there. Respected Adv. Subhash Vasist, can u do something for us? -- Mohib Anwar Rafel 2009 - 2011 M.Phil, International Legal Studies, JNU. 2011 - 2013 LL.M, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. 2013 - Pursuing Ph.D in International
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
I know it is difficult to be sure of a scribe till the last minute and I have gone through this hell myself. I had told you to keep a petition ready for the High Court while you were waiting for this letter and I had also told you that I would be in Delhi from the 20th of May to help if needed-please refer to previous emails on this subject. Just check on the different centres available forthis exam-is there one centre in Delhi or many. UPSC has many examinees sitting so they can actually have one common venue for all disabled examinees. I don't know how many sit for the Judicial services exams and how many centres ae there. I would have liked you to go to court rather than the CCPD for the accessible papers and etra time etc. Pankaj or Akhilesh could have handled this matter if you had listened to me at that time. I would have also been in Delhi and we would have won. This would have closed the matter for ever. Delhi HC has a vacation court from next week CCPD will give the orders I am sure but implementation is difficult by 1st June. Anyway send it tomorrow for sure with a copy to the Delhi registry. I would actually like you to write to the Registry on extra time. If it works great and if does not then it will definitely work for the next time. This is the same problem with UPSC. Most of the people don't follow up during the yearand only wake up towards the last few days. I don't like this and keep following up whether exams are due or not. If you don't want my comments as someone on this group has suggested then please let me know and I will stop answering your emails. Take care and work hard. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 18 May 2014 12:45 To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam 1. Their condition is that the person must not graduate/post graduate in law, I accept it, but this conditionality can be ascertained at the day of the examination too. It is not easy for a visually challenged to find a person who could commit you that in any case he would be available after 10 days, (because the letter has to reach to high court latest by 25). 2. Accessible venue mean, the venue which is well connected to popular transport means such as Delhi metro, or is situated at well known place, or is near to candidate's residential area. So that it could be easy to reach the exam center with out much difficulty. Say for instance, the examination center allotted to me is at the other corner of Delhi and the place is not connected to Delhi metro, it gets difficult to reach at such venues. What UPSC does, they keep center near to Delhi metro where u don't have to cross the road even. More over at such venues the staf also are not trained to cater the special requirement of disabled candidates. Mam, what can I do now, except going to CCPD, at least to order high court administration to provide question paper in accessible format and to remove the condition of firnishing an affidavit one week in advance. Indirectly high court administration compeling the VI candidates to accept their own scribes. And yes, I am concentrating on my syllabus, but before the exam, the worrey of scribe is horrible. On 5/18/14, KanchanPamnani wrote: > I don't agree with 1. You have to give the name and details of your scribe > before the exam. Hardly any examining body allows you to get a scribe at > the last minute. This is also for your own safety-in case someone rejects > it. You were aware of your exams and should have a few friends as backup. > 2. You must ask them in a polite letter and email about the extra time and > the accessible question papers. Then go to the CCPD. > 3. What do you mean by an accessible venue for the visually challenged? > This > is normally very important for the physically challenged. Please explain in > detail. Also if there is only one venue in Delhi for such exams then > unlikely that they will make any special change for you. What you must get > is a quiet place away from other examinees where no one overhears the > dictation to your scribe. > I hope you have studied well and are concentrating on your syllabus now. > Best wishes > Kanchan > > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of Mohib Anwar Rafel > Sent: 18 May 2014 11:38 > To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning > the disabled. > Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in > Delhi > judicial services exam > > 1. condition of producing scribes documents one week ahead of the > examination are not acceptable to me. Because its diffi
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
1. Their condition is that the person must not graduate/post graduate in law, I accept it, but this conditionality can be ascertained at the day of the examination too. It is not easy for a visually challenged to find a person who could commit you that in any case he would be available after 10 days, (because the letter has to reach to high court latest by 25). 2. Accessible venue mean, the venue which is well connected to popular transport means such as Delhi metro, or is situated at well known place, or is near to candidate's residential area. So that it could be easy to reach the exam center with out much difficulty. Say for instance, the examination center allotted to me is at the other corner of Delhi and the place is not connected to Delhi metro, it gets difficult to reach at such venues. What UPSC does, they keep center near to Delhi metro where u don't have to cross the road even. More over at such venues the staf also are not trained to cater the special requirement of disabled candidates. Mam, what can I do now, except going to CCPD, at least to order high court administration to provide question paper in accessible format and to remove the condition of firnishing an affidavit one week in advance. Indirectly high court administration compeling the VI candidates to accept their own scribes. And yes, I am concentrating on my syllabus, but before the exam, the worrey of scribe is horrible. On 5/18/14, KanchanPamnani wrote: > I don't agree with 1. You have to give the name and details of your scribe > before the exam. Hardly any examining body allows you to get a scribe at > the last minute. This is also for your own safety-in case someone rejects > it. You were aware of your exams and should have a few friends as backup. > 2. You must ask them in a polite letter and email about the extra time and > the accessible question papers. Then go to the CCPD. > 3. What do you mean by an accessible venue for the visually challenged? > This > is normally very important for the physically challenged. Please explain in > detail. Also if there is only one venue in Delhi for such exams then > unlikely that they will make any special change for you. What you must get > is a quiet place away from other examinees where no one overhears the > dictation to your scribe. > I hope you have studied well and are concentrating on your syllabus now. > Best wishes > Kanchan > > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of Mohib Anwar Rafel > Sent: 18 May 2014 11:38 > To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning > the disabled. > Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in > Delhi > judicial services exam > > 1. condition of producing scribes documents one week ahead of the > examination are not acceptable to me. Because its difficult to ensure > the availability of that very person, I have to approach my friends > and will have to decide who will be available on that day, as they > themselves are not sure about their availability. > 2. They haven't specified regarding extra time. as per their old > rules, they provide 15 minutes per hour, while it must not be less > than 20 minutes per hour. > 3. I asked them to allot the examination center at accessible venue, > which they have totally rejected and informed that allotting the > center is done through another agency, therefore its not possible. > 4. I want that question paper must be provided to me in accessible > format viz. in MS word or html format with screen reader. If they > provide me question paper in computer, I will be having no problem > with their scribe. > > I am planning to go to CCPD immideatly tomorrow to ensure the above points. > > On 5/18/14, KanchanPamnani wrote: >> Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. >> Also what happened about the extra time. >> Are you satisfied. >> What provision do you want to challenge? >> Kanchan >> -Original Message----- >> From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On > Behalf >> Of Mohib Anwar Rafel >> Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 >> To: accessindia >> Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi >> judicial services exam >> >> Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which >> is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a >> representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding >> implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. >> Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their >> own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each >> hour
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
I kindly request you to intervene in this matter only if you're willing to support up to the end. I'm telling this because, if I remember correct, I've read an email telling that you're being a two faced person in accessindia a couple of weeks before. -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of KanchanPamnani Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:18 AM To: 'AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled.' Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challenge? Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 To: accessindia Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on the date of the Examination. Yours faithfully, (Manish Aggarwal) Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" Respected members, these conditions are clearly contradictory to MSJE guidelines. In case I am bringing my own scribe, before one week of exam how can I ensure that I will bring such and such person? Some time it is dependent upon the availability of the person and sometime it is decided only one day ahead of the examination that who will be my scribe. Here its very problematic to supply the details of the scribe, indirectly they are again pushing us to accept their scribe who are not even know how to read questions properly. I want to know whether any humanright agency, any advocate on the list can help us to file a petition on the behalf of candidates? If I will go personally, it will take time and this precious time for the preparation of the exam will be wested there. Respected Adv. Subhash Vasist, can u do something for us? -- Mohib Anwar Rafel 2009 - 2011 M.Phil, International Legal Studies, JNU. 2011 - 2013 LL.M, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. 2013 - Pursuing Ph.D in International Law, JNU Phone: 09811767506, 09211194222 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessind ia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessind ia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindi
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
I don't agree with 1. You have to give the name and details of your scribe before the exam. Hardly any examining body allows you to get a scribe at the last minute. This is also for your own safety-in case someone rejects it. You were aware of your exams and should have a few friends as backup. 2. You must ask them in a polite letter and email about the extra time and the accessible question papers. Then go to the CCPD. 3. What do you mean by an accessible venue for the visually challenged? This is normally very important for the physically challenged. Please explain in detail. Also if there is only one venue in Delhi for such exams then unlikely that they will make any special change for you. What you must get is a quiet place away from other examinees where no one overhears the dictation to your scribe. I hope you have studied well and are concentrating on your syllabus now. Best wishes Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 18 May 2014 11:38 To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam 1. condition of producing scribes documents one week ahead of the examination are not acceptable to me. Because its difficult to ensure the availability of that very person, I have to approach my friends and will have to decide who will be available on that day, as they themselves are not sure about their availability. 2. They haven't specified regarding extra time. as per their old rules, they provide 15 minutes per hour, while it must not be less than 20 minutes per hour. 3. I asked them to allot the examination center at accessible venue, which they have totally rejected and informed that allotting the center is done through another agency, therefore its not possible. 4. I want that question paper must be provided to me in accessible format viz. in MS word or html format with screen reader. If they provide me question paper in computer, I will be having no problem with their scribe. I am planning to go to CCPD immideatly tomorrow to ensure the above points. On 5/18/14, KanchanPamnani wrote: > Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. > Also what happened about the extra time. > Are you satisfied. > What provision do you want to challenge? > Kanchan > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of Mohib Anwar Rafel > Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 > To: accessindia > Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi > judicial services exam > > Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which > is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a > representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding > implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. > Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their > own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each > hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. > Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi > High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to > firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, > the letter reads as under: > "From > The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi > I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a > scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service > Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, > subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing > the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential > address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe > is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. > I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly > sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the > office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of > nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer > interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the > scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on > the date of the Examination. > > Yours faithfully, > (Manish Aggarwal) > Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" > > Respected members, these conditions are clearly contradictory to MSJE > guidelines. In case I am bringing my own scribe, before one week of > exam how can I ensure that I will bring such and such person? Some > time it is dependent upon the availability of the person and sometime > it is decided only one day ahead of the exami
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
1. condition of producing scribes documents one week ahead of the examination are not acceptable to me. Because its difficult to ensure the availability of that very person, I have to approach my friends and will have to decide who will be available on that day, as they themselves are not sure about their availability. 2. They haven't specified regarding extra time. as per their old rules, they provide 15 minutes per hour, while it must not be less than 20 minutes per hour. 3. I asked them to allot the examination center at accessible venue, which they have totally rejected and informed that allotting the center is done through another agency, therefore its not possible. 4. I want that question paper must be provided to me in accessible format viz. in MS word or html format with screen reader. If they provide me question paper in computer, I will be having no problem with their scribe. I am planning to go to CCPD immideatly tomorrow to ensure the above points. On 5/18/14, KanchanPamnani wrote: > Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. > Also what happened about the extra time. > Are you satisfied. > What provision do you want to challenge? > Kanchan > -Original Message- > From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf > Of Mohib Anwar Rafel > Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 > To: accessindia > Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi > judicial services exam > > Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which > is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a > representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding > implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. > Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their > own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each > hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. > Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi > High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to > firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, > the letter reads as under: > "From > The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi > I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a > scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service > Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, > subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing > the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential > address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe > is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. > I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly > sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the > office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of > nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer > interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the > scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on > the date of the Examination. > > Yours faithfully, > (Manish Aggarwal) > Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" > > Respected members, these conditions are clearly contradictory to MSJE > guidelines. In case I am bringing my own scribe, before one week of > exam how can I ensure that I will bring such and such person? Some > time it is dependent upon the availability of the person and sometime > it is decided only one day ahead of the examination that who will be > my scribe. Here its very problematic to supply the details of the > scribe, indirectly they are again pushing us to accept their scribe > who are not even know how to read questions properly. I want to know > whether any humanright agency, any advocate on the list can help us to > file a petition on the behalf of candidates? If I will go personally, > it will take time and this precious time for the preparation of the > exam will be wested there. > Respected Adv. Subhash Vasist, can u do something for us? > > > > -- > Mohib Anwar Rafel > 2009 - 2011 M.Phil, International Legal Studies, JNU. > 2011 - 2013 LL.M, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. > 2013 - Pursuing Ph.D in International Law, JNU > Phone: 09811767506, > 09211194222 > > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessind > ia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Please scan the letter received and send it directly to me. Also what happened about the extra time. Are you satisfied. What provision do you want to challenge? Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Mohib Anwar Rafel Sent: 17 May 2014 22:10 To: accessindia Subject: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on the date of the Examination. Yours faithfully, (Manish Aggarwal) Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" Respected members, these conditions are clearly contradictory to MSJE guidelines. In case I am bringing my own scribe, before one week of exam how can I ensure that I will bring such and such person? Some time it is dependent upon the availability of the person and sometime it is decided only one day ahead of the examination that who will be my scribe. Here its very problematic to supply the details of the scribe, indirectly they are again pushing us to accept their scribe who are not even know how to read questions properly. I want to know whether any humanright agency, any advocate on the list can help us to file a petition on the behalf of candidates? If I will go personally, it will take time and this precious time for the preparation of the exam will be wested there. Respected Adv. Subhash Vasist, can u do something for us? -- Mohib Anwar Rafel 2009 - 2011 M.Phil, International Legal Studies, JNU. 2011 - 2013 LL.M, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. 2013 - Pursuing Ph.D in International Law, JNU Phone: 09811767506, 09211194222 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessind ia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
Re: [AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Correction in the following sentence: Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring my own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. On 5/17/14, Mohib Anwar Rafel wrote: > Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which > is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a > representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding > implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. > Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their > own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each > hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. > Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi > High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to > firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, > the letter reads as under: > "From > The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi > I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a > scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service > Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, > subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing > the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential > address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe > is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. > I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly > sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the > office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of > nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer > interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the > scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on > the date of the Examination. > > Yours faithfully, > (Manish Aggarwal) > Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" > > Respected members, these conditions are clearly contradictory to MSJE > guidelines. In case I am bringing my own scribe, before one week of > exam how can I ensure that I will bring such and such person? Some > time it is dependent upon the availability of the person and sometime > it is decided only one day ahead of the examination that who will be > my scribe. Here its very problematic to supply the details of the > scribe, indirectly they are again pushing us to accept their scribe > who are not even know how to read questions properly. I want to know > whether any humanright agency, any advocate on the list can help us to > file a petition on the behalf of candidates? If I will go personally, > it will take time and this precious time for the preparation of the > exam will be wested there. > Respected Adv. Subhash Vasist, can u do something for us? > > > > -- > Mohib Anwar Rafel > 2009 - 2011 M.Phil, International Legal Studies, JNU. > 2011 - 2013 LL.M, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. > 2013 - Pursuing Ph.D in International Law, JNU > Phone: 09811767506, > 09211194222 > -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
[AI] Urgent legal assistance required in scribe matter in Delhi judicial services exam
Hi friends, I am going to appear in Delhi Judicial Services exam which is scheduled to be held on 1st of June 2014. Earlier I submitted a representation to Registrar General of Delhi High Court regarding implementation of of MSJE and CCPD guidelines in upcoming DJS exam. Wherein I demanded that the candidates must be allowed to bring their own scribe and, 20 minutes compensatory time should be allotted each hour to the candidate using services of the scribe. Today (17th May) I received a letter from assistant registrar of Delhi High court, allowing me to bring their own scribe and asking to firnish the detail of scribe. I have problem with their conditions, the letter reads as under: "From The Registrar General High Court of Delhi New Delhi I am directed to inform you that you have been permitted to bring a scribe of your choice for appearing in Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination - 2014 scheduled to be held on 01.06.2014, subject to the condition that you will submit an affidavit containing the details of the scribe viz, his name, father's name, residential address, educational qualification and an undertaking that the scribe is not a graduate / post-graduate in Law. I am further directed to inform you that the aforesaid affidavit duly sworn by you along with a photograph of the scribe, shall reach the office of Joint Registrar (Vig.) by 25.05.2014 and in case of nonreceipt thereof, it shall be presumed that you are no longer interested in bringing your own scribe and in that eventuality, the scribe will be provided by this Court at the respective Test Centre on the date of the Examination. Yours faithfully, (Manish Aggarwal) Assistant Registrar (Vigilance.)" Respected members, these conditions are clearly contradictory to MSJE guidelines. In case I am bringing my own scribe, before one week of exam how can I ensure that I will bring such and such person? Some time it is dependent upon the availability of the person and sometime it is decided only one day ahead of the examination that who will be my scribe. Here its very problematic to supply the details of the scribe, indirectly they are again pushing us to accept their scribe who are not even know how to read questions properly. I want to know whether any humanright agency, any advocate on the list can help us to file a petition on the behalf of candidates? If I will go personally, it will take time and this precious time for the preparation of the exam will be wested there. Respected Adv. Subhash Vasist, can u do something for us? -- Mohib Anwar Rafel 2009 - 2011 M.Phil, International Legal Studies, JNU. 2011 - 2013 LL.M, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. 2013 - Pursuing Ph.D in International Law, JNU Phone: 09811767506, 09211194222 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
