[Ace] FW: The ACE WG has placed draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
This document state change is an error on my part. I selected the wrong WG in the datatracker interface. ACE is NOT considering this draft for adoption! Regards, Roman -Original Message- From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 5:25 PM To: ace-cha...@ietf.org; draft-boucadair-dots-server-discov...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org Subject: The ACE WG has placed draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" The ACE WG has placed draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Roman Danyliw) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery/ ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
[Ace] The ACE WG has placed draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
The ACE WG has placed draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Roman Danyliw) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery/ ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
[Ace] The ACE WG has placed draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
The ACE WG has placed draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Roman Danyliw) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining/ ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
[Ace] The ACE WG has placed draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
The ACE WG has placed draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Roman Danyliw) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm/ ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
[Ace] Call for adoption of draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining
Hello! This is the start of a two week call for input on the WG adoption of the document: draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining-05 The document has been presented and discussed at the last few meetings; and revisions have been made based on WG feedback. At the IETF 103 meeting, there was support for adoption; and volunteers to review and implement the draft. Please provide feedback to the list/chairs if you believe that this document should be adopted as a WG document.The adoption call will end on December 14 2018. Regards, Roman and Jim ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
[Ace] Call for adoption of draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm
Hello! This is the start of a two week call for input on the WG adoption of the document: draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm-02 The document has been presented and discussed at the last few meetings; and revisions have been made based on WG feedback. At the IETF 103 meeting, there was support for adoption; and volunteers to review and implement the draft. Please provide feedback to the list/chairs if you believe that this document should be adopted as a WG document.The adoption call will end on December 14 2018. Regards, Roman and Jim ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
Re: [Ace] Idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
On Nov 30, 2018, at 17:50, Roman Danyliw wrote:
>
> /protected header / h’A1010A' /{ \alg\ 1:10 \AES-CCM-16-64-128\}/,
You may want to switch to the << … >> form:
> /protected header / << { /alg/ 1: 10 /AES-CCM-16-64-128/ } >>,
Grüße, Carsten
___
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
Re: [Ace] Syntax check of examples in draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
Thanks - we'll address that as well.
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 11:10 AM
To: ace@ietf.org
Subject: [Ace] Syntax check of examples in
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
Hello!
As part of my shepherd review, I ran all of the examples in
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05 through a CBOR diagnostic-to-CBOR
validator (thanks Carsten for cbor.me). All of the examples were fine but the
first one in Section 3.3:
--[current text]--
{
/kty/ 1 : /Symmetric/ 4,
/alg/ 3 : /HMAC256/ 5,
/k/ -1 : h'6684523ab17337f173500e5728c628547cb37df
e68449c65f885d1b73b49eae1A0B0C0D0E0F10'
}
--[end]--
The error was:
Expected one of [ \t\n\r], "/", [0-9a-fA-F] at line 5, column 56 (byte 184)
after { /kty/ 1 : /Symmetric/ 4, /alg/ 3 : /HMAC256/ 5, /k/ -1 :
h'6684523ab17337f173500e5728c628547cb37df e68449c65f885d1b73b49eae1A0B0C0D0E0F10
It appears that the string of hex encoded octets in /k/ is short one character.
Roman
___
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
___
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
Re: [Ace] Idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
Will do...
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 8:50 AM
To: ace@ietf.org
Subject: [Ace] Idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
Hi!
As part of the shepherd review, I ran idnits on
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05. The following nits were found.
Could these please be fixed in a revised draft.
--[ snip ]--
Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest one
being 1 character in excess of 72.
Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5226 (Obsoleted by RFC 8126)
== Outdated reference: A later version (-17) exists of
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-16
-- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 7159
(Obsoleted by RFC 8259)
Summary: 2 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 2 comments (--).
--[ snip ]--
The line which exceeds 72 characters is in Section 3.4. Specifically:
/protected header / h'A1010A' /{ \alg\ 1:10 \AES-CCM-16-64-128\}/,
Regards,
Roman
___
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
___
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
[Ace] Syntax check of examples in draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
Hello!
As part of my shepherd review, I ran all of the examples in
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05 through a CBOR diagnostic-to-CBOR
validator (thanks Carsten for cbor.me). All of the examples were fine but the
first one in Section 3.3:
--[current text]--
{
/kty/ 1 : /Symmetric/ 4,
/alg/ 3 : /HMAC256/ 5,
/k/ -1 : h'6684523ab17337f173500e5728c628547cb37df
e68449c65f885d1b73b49eae1A0B0C0D0E0F10'
}
--[end]--
The error was:
Expected one of [ \t\n\r], "/", [0-9a-fA-F] at line 5, column 56 (byte 184)
after { /kty/ 1 : /Symmetric/ 4, /alg/ 3 : /HMAC256/ 5, /k/ -1 :
h'6684523ab17337f173500e5728c628547cb37df e68449c65f885d1b73b49eae1A0B0C0D0E0F10
It appears that the string of hex encoded octets in /k/ is short one character.
Roman
___
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
Re: [Ace] IPR Conformance check for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession
Likewise, I am not aware of any IPR that pertains to this specification. -- Mike From: Ace on behalf of Göran Selander Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 8:50:24 AM To: Roman Danyliw; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] IPR Conformance check for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession Correction! I am NOT aware of any IPR related to this draft. (Thanks Roman for spotting the unfortunate missing words !) Göran > 30 nov. 2018 kl. 16:42 skrev Göran Selander : > > > I aware of any IPR related to this draft. > > BR > Göran > > On 2018-11-27, 15:44, "Ace on behalf of Roman Danyliw" on behalf of r...@cert.org> wrote: > >Hello draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession authors, >(Hi Mike, Ludwig, Goeran, Samuel and Hannes,) > >As the shepherd for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession, I'd like to > confirm with the authors that all IPR disclosures have occurred per RFC6702: > >--[ shepherd questions ]-- > >(7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures > required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have > already been filed. If not, explain why? > >--[end question]-- > >Can you please respond to the list answering this question (e.g., "As a > co-author, I don't hold any IPR nor am I aware of any related to this draft"). > >Thanks, >Roman > >___ >Ace mailing list >Ace@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > > > ___ > Ace mailing list > Ace@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
[Ace] Idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
Hi!
As part of the shepherd review, I ran idnits on
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05. The following nits were found.
Could these please be fixed in a revised draft.
--[ snip ]--
Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest one
being 1 character in excess of 72.
Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5226 (Obsoleted by RFC 8126)
== Outdated reference: A later version (-17) exists of
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-16
-- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 7159
(Obsoleted by RFC 8259)
Summary: 2 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 2 comments (--).
--[ snip ]--
The line which exceeds 72 characters is in Section 3.4. Specifically:
/protected header / h'A1010A' /{ \alg\ 1:10 \AES-CCM-16-64-128\}/,
Regards,
Roman
___
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
Re: [Ace] IPR Conformance check for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession
Correction! I am NOT aware of any IPR related to this draft. (Thanks Roman for spotting the unfortunate missing words !) Göran > 30 nov. 2018 kl. 16:42 skrev Göran Selander : > > > I aware of any IPR related to this draft. > > BR > Göran > > On 2018-11-27, 15:44, "Ace on behalf of Roman Danyliw" on behalf of r...@cert.org> wrote: > >Hello draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession authors, >(Hi Mike, Ludwig, Goeran, Samuel and Hannes,) > >As the shepherd for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession, I'd like to > confirm with the authors that all IPR disclosures have occurred per RFC6702: > >--[ shepherd questions ]-- > >(7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures > required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have > already been filed. If not, explain why? > >--[end question]-- > >Can you please respond to the list answering this question (e.g., "As a > co-author, I don't hold any IPR nor am I aware of any related to this draft"). > >Thanks, >Roman > >___ >Ace mailing list >Ace@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > > > ___ > Ace mailing list > Ace@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
Re: [Ace] IPR Conformance check for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession
I aware of any IPR related to this draft. BR Göran On 2018-11-27, 15:44, "Ace on behalf of Roman Danyliw" wrote: Hello draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession authors, (Hi Mike, Ludwig, Goeran, Samuel and Hannes,) As the shepherd for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession, I'd like to confirm with the authors that all IPR disclosures have occurred per RFC6702: --[ shepherd questions ]-- (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why? --[end question]-- Can you please respond to the list answering this question (e.g., "As a co-author, I don't hold any IPR nor am I aware of any related to this draft"). Thanks, Roman ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace ___ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
