Re: default config machinery

2012-04-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 16 April 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 we now have a plasma-mobile-config git repo (where different devices would
 be different branches) that has also the startactive modules, since they
 may be device dependent as well.

to update this, now i have 

plasma-contour-config
plasma-contour-config-meego 
plasma-contour-config-vivaldi

building from the different branches


i would still try to rename
kde-skel-binary
to
nepomuk-default-database-skel (since is what it is)

and try to keep the startactive modules in startactive (hopefully not many 
device specific changes will be needed?) tomake a tad easier to package

then i would really like to merge this asap in devel (if continuous 
integration out of the different branches can be enabled would be awesome)

Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active


Re: default config machinery

2012-04-19 Thread Lamarque V. Souza
Em Thursday 19 April 2012, Marco Martin escreveu:
 On Monday 16 April 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
  Hi all,
  
  we now have a plasma-mobile-config git repo (where different devices
  would be different branches) that has also the startactive modules,
  since they may be device dependent as well.
 
 to update this, now i have
 
 plasma-contour-config
 plasma-contour-config-meego
 plasma-contour-config-vivaldi
 
 building from the different branches
 
 
 i would still try to rename
 kde-skel-binary
 to
 nepomuk-default-database-skel (since is what it is)

 I think we should follow a standard to name packages. Above you used 
the customization strings (device name / operating system) as suffix (e.g. 
plasma-contour-config-meego), here you used the customization string (default) 
in the middle of the package name. nepomuk-database-default would be a better 
name (or just nepomuk-database if we really follow the standard for plasma-
contour-config). Then we can use nepomuk-database-vivaldi, nepomuk-database-
something else. The skel is not necessary in my oppinion. If you check you 
will see that other packages install files in /etc/skel without having skel 
in their names.
 
 and try to keep the startactive modules in startactive (hopefully not many
 device specific changes will be needed?) tomake a tad easier to package

+1. I prefer keeping configuration files near the programs that use 
them 
(if possible).

-- 
Lamarque V. Souza
http://www.basyskom.com/
___
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active


Re: PA OpenEmbedded support (WIP)

2012-04-19 Thread Samuel Stirtzel
2012/4/19 Lamarque V. Souza lamarque.souza@basyskom.com:
 Em Thursday 19 April 2012, Samuel Stirtzel escreveu:

 2012/3/30 Lamarque V. Souza lamarque.souza@basyskom.com:

  Em Friday 30 March 2012, Samuel Stirtzel escreveu:

  Hi,

 

  Hi,

 

  lately I have good progress on my work, normal KDE applications seem

 

  to work fine in OpenEmbedded.

 

  But my main goal, to port PA, still needs some effort.

 

 

 

  Currently I'm at the point that the home screen of PA shows up,

 

  but it seems like something went wrong with the declarative

  scriptengine.

 

 

 

  So there is a big sign with a X as label showing the text:

 

  Could not create a declarativeappletscript sctiptengine

 

  Enable all debug messages using kdebugdialog program (if possible),

  restart the graphical interface, try again and send me the

  ~/.xsession-errors file.



 Hi,

 I'm still working on this and looked through it once again,

 and there seem to be more relevant parts in the logfile:



 You are probably using packages compiled with different versions of Qt,
 kdelibs or other dependencies of DeclarativeWidget. Send me the output of
 the command rpm -qa.


Please note I am a developer,
I am not using any precompiled iso/images.
Currently I am running on an ARMv7a Overo Gumstix and create build
instructions (to cross compile PA on a tool-chain) for OpenEmbedded
[1] and the Yocto Project [2].


I am building everything from source, so I don't have them installed via RPM.
But as opkg (the package manager I use) shows them as:
libqtcore4 - 4.8.0
kdelibs4 - 4.8.0
kde-runtime - 4.8.0
...

A full list of _all_ installed packages: http://pastebin.com/CVV2zRvy

[1] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Main_Page
[2] http://www.yoctoproject.org/

-- 
Regards
Samuel
___
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active


Re: PA OpenEmbedded support (WIP)

2012-04-19 Thread Lamarque V. Souza
Em Thursday 19 April 2012, Samuel Stirtzel escreveu:
 2012/4/19 Lamarque V. Souza lamarque.souza@basyskom.com:
  Em Thursday 19 April 2012, Samuel Stirtzel escreveu:
  2012/3/30 Lamarque V. Souza lamarque.souza@basyskom.com:
   Em Friday 30 March 2012, Samuel Stirtzel escreveu:
   Hi,
   
   Hi,
   
   lately I have good progress on my work, normal KDE applications seem
   
   
   
   to work fine in OpenEmbedded.
   
   
   
   But my main goal, to port PA, still needs some effort.
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Currently I'm at the point that the home screen of PA shows up,
   
   
   
   but it seems like something went wrong with the declarative
   
   scriptengine.
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   So there is a big sign with a X as label showing the text:
   
   
   
   Could not create a declarativeappletscript sctiptengine
   
   Enable all debug messages using kdebugdialog program (if possible),
   
   restart the graphical interface, try again and send me the
   
   ~/.xsession-errors file.
  
  Hi,
  
  I'm still working on this and looked through it once again,
  
  and there seem to be more relevant parts in the logfile:
  You are probably using packages compiled with different versions of Qt,
  kdelibs or other dependencies of DeclarativeWidget. Send me the output of
  the command rpm -qa.
 
 Please note I am a developer,
 I am not using any precompiled iso/images.
 Currently I am running on an ARMv7a Overo Gumstix and create build
 instructions (to cross compile PA on a tool-chain) for OpenEmbedded
 [1] and the Yocto Project [2].
 
Well, there must be something wrong with the kde-runtime package you 
compiled. The message 

plasma-device(583)/libplasma Plasma::loadEngine: Couldn't load script engine 
for language  declarativeappletscript ! error reported:  The service 
'Declarative widget' does not provide an interface 'Plasma::AppletScript' w

DeclarativeAppletScript (from plasma_appletscript_declarative.so, which 
is the library used by 'Declarative widget' service) inherits from 
Plasma::AppletScript.
 
 I am building everything from source, so I don't have them installed via
 RPM. But as opkg (the package manager I use) shows them as:
 libqtcore4 - 4.8.0
 kdelibs4 - 4.8.0
 kde-runtime - 4.8.0

That seems fine regarding this particular problem. You should use 
kdelibs-4.8.2, which includes a fix for a slowness problem in nepomuk.

-- 
Lamarque V. Souza
http://www.basyskom.com/
___
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active


Re: search item issue

2012-04-19 Thread flash yan

But I have tried the search function of adding app or widgets.
It still have three characters limits.

Flash yan
On 04/20/2012 08:19 AM, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:


Em Thursday 19 April 2012, flash yan escreveu:

 Hi all,



 I found that the search function in plasma-active is limited in three

 characters.

 I think it should no characters limits.

That is already fixed in the development version:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296941

--

Lamarque V. Souza

http://www.basyskom.com/



___
Active mailing list
Active@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active