[ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode

2001-10-17 Thread Fugleberg, David A

We have a mixed mode AD (Single forest/single tree/single domain), with
about 20 DCs and 35 BDCs.  Accounts are administered centrally by a very
small group, and they typically connect to the DC that holds the PDC
FSMO to do all administrative tasks. 

Our account lockout policy locks accounts after three bad attempts.
Over the past several months, we've seen a couple strange issues with
account lockouts:
1. Once in awhile, a user will be locked out again and again for no
apparent reason.  For example, they arrive at work, attempt to login,
and are locked out.  The admins unlock the account and the user logs in,
but if you check the account later it is locked out again. If the user
then logs out, they are unable to login because of the lock.  We've seen
this happen to a given user several times over a few days, then
mysteriously disappear.  Some users have a great deal of trouble with
this; most never see it.

2. When an account is locked out, the admin will typically unlock it by
going to the account tab on the user's object in Active Directory Users
and Computers.  In some cases, however, even after doing so the user is
unable to logon.  Since these folks are old-time NT admins, they will
then often open User Manager for Domains and try unlocking the account
from there.  Strangely, they sometimes need to perform the unlock from
BOTH tools before the user is able to logon.  At first, I thought this
was just a timing issue, or that they were looking at the account info
on different servers, but I have seen with my own eyes cases where ADU&C
connected to the PDC emulator shows one lockout status, and User Manager
for Domains shows another.

I'm trying to get the admins away from User Manager for Domains
altogether, but they don't trust 'Users and Computers' in this case.
I've tried to explain that the "Nt Domain" and the "Active Directory
Domain" are the SAME THING, but they're not buying it when they see a
different view in the two tools.

My questions:
1. Is anybody else havong similar lockout problems ?  The Q articles on
the subject don't seem to apply to this scenario.
2. When an admin uses User Manager for Domains, it obviously can make
changes only at the (emulated) PDC.  Does this mean that the lockout
status it displays is the one stored on that server, or is it possible
that it's displaying status read from a BDC ?
3. Has anyone else seen a case where they had to unlock an account using
both tools before the user could login ?
4. Is there any other reason why attributes that are displayable in User
Manager for Domains should NOT be IDENTICAL to the same attributes as
displayed in Active Directory Users and Computers ?  In other words,
does the PDC emulator store this data in a separate SAM that can somehow
be temporarily out of sync with the AD, or is the PDC emulator a
real-time conduit into the AD store ?

Thanks for any ideas...
Dave Fugleberg


List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode

2001-10-17 Thread DeGrands, Charles

We have 5 domains in our environment, but only one has a three lock out
scenario like yours.  We are in Native mode and I have witnessed this.  A
first I blamed it on user error, since the help desk for that area is not up
to par.  Then one day it happened to me.  I hadn't logged in to the domain
in some time and once I did, I was locked out on one attempt.

Unfortunately, I don't have a cure.  I wanted to let you know that the mixed
mode might not have anything to do with it.  

Please let us know if you find anything.

-Original Message-
From: Fugleberg, David A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode


We have a mixed mode AD (Single forest/single tree/single domain), with
about 20 DCs and 35 BDCs.  Accounts are administered centrally by a very
small group, and they typically connect to the DC that holds the PDC
FSMO to do all administrative tasks. 

Our account lockout policy locks accounts after three bad attempts.
Over the past several months, we've seen a couple strange issues with
account lockouts:
1. Once in awhile, a user will be locked out again and again for no
apparent reason.  For example, they arrive at work, attempt to login,
and are locked out.  The admins unlock the account and the user logs in,
but if you check the account later it is locked out again. If the user
then logs out, they are unable to login because of the lock.  We've seen
this happen to a given user several times over a few days, then
mysteriously disappear.  Some users have a great deal of trouble with
this; most never see it.

2. When an account is locked out, the admin will typically unlock it by
going to the account tab on the user's object in Active Directory Users
and Computers.  In some cases, however, even after doing so the user is
unable to logon.  Since these folks are old-time NT admins, they will
then often open User Manager for Domains and try unlocking the account
from there.  Strangely, they sometimes need to perform the unlock from
BOTH tools before the user is able to logon.  At first, I thought this
was just a timing issue, or that they were looking at the account info
on different servers, but I have seen with my own eyes cases where ADU&C
connected to the PDC emulator shows one lockout status, and User Manager
for Domains shows another.

I'm trying to get the admins away from User Manager for Domains
altogether, but they don't trust 'Users and Computers' in this case.
I've tried to explain that the "Nt Domain" and the "Active Directory
Domain" are the SAME THING, but they're not buying it when they see a
different view in the two tools.

My questions:
1. Is anybody else havong similar lockout problems ?  The Q articles on
the subject don't seem to apply to this scenario.
2. When an admin uses User Manager for Domains, it obviously can make
changes only at the (emulated) PDC.  Does this mean that the lockout
status it displays is the one stored on that server, or is it possible
that it's displaying status read from a BDC ?
3. Has anyone else seen a case where they had to unlock an account using
both tools before the user could login ?
4. Is there any other reason why attributes that are displayable in User
Manager for Domains should NOT be IDENTICAL to the same attributes as
displayed in Active Directory Users and Computers ?  In other words,
does the PDC emulator store this data in a separate SAM that can somehow
be temporarily out of sync with the AD, or is the PDC emulator a
real-time conduit into the AD store ?

Thanks for any ideas...
Dave Fugleberg


List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode

2001-10-17 Thread Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO

Actually, we have seen similar issues in our mixed mode domain. Sometimes,
it seems that there is a sync problem between pdc and bdc's. Other times, we
have no clue why it is occuring to an individual over and over again. We
have even gone so far as to delete and recreate accounts in AD for users
experiencing repeated lock-outs. The only common thread seems to have been
their accessing exchange through outlook. Users could log in after their
account was unlocked, but later in the day they would be locked out again.
Passwords were not being cached at all, and it was almost always a Win2kPro
box that the user was logging on through. I am uncertain as to the exact
cause(s), but recreating the user object has resolved the issues for users
experiencing this.

-Original Message-
From: Fugleberg, David A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode


We have a mixed mode AD (Single forest/single tree/single domain), with
about 20 DCs and 35 BDCs.  Accounts are administered centrally by a very
small group, and they typically connect to the DC that holds the PDC
FSMO to do all administrative tasks. 

Our account lockout policy locks accounts after three bad attempts.
Over the past several months, we've seen a couple strange issues with
account lockouts:
1. Once in awhile, a user will be locked out again and again for no
apparent reason.  For example, they arrive at work, attempt to login,
and are locked out.  The admins unlock the account and the user logs in,
but if you check the account later it is locked out again. If the user
then logs out, they are unable to login because of the lock.  We've seen
this happen to a given user several times over a few days, then
mysteriously disappear.  Some users have a great deal of trouble with
this; most never see it.

2. When an account is locked out, the admin will typically unlock it by
going to the account tab on the user's object in Active Directory Users
and Computers.  In some cases, however, even after doing so the user is
unable to logon.  Since these folks are old-time NT admins, they will
then often open User Manager for Domains and try unlocking the account
from there.  Strangely, they sometimes need to perform the unlock from
BOTH tools before the user is able to logon.  At first, I thought this
was just a timing issue, or that they were looking at the account info
on different servers, but I have seen with my own eyes cases where ADU&C
connected to the PDC emulator shows one lockout status, and User Manager
for Domains shows another.

I'm trying to get the admins away from User Manager for Domains
altogether, but they don't trust 'Users and Computers' in this case.
I've tried to explain that the "Nt Domain" and the "Active Directory
Domain" are the SAME THING, but they're not buying it when they see a
different view in the two tools.

My questions:
1. Is anybody else havong similar lockout problems ?  The Q articles on
the subject don't seem to apply to this scenario.
2. When an admin uses User Manager for Domains, it obviously can make
changes only at the (emulated) PDC.  Does this mean that the lockout
status it displays is the one stored on that server, or is it possible
that it's displaying status read from a BDC ?
3. Has anyone else seen a case where they had to unlock an account using
both tools before the user could login ?
4. Is there any other reason why attributes that are displayable in User
Manager for Domains should NOT be IDENTICAL to the same attributes as
displayed in Active Directory Users and Computers ?  In other words,
does the PDC emulator store this data in a separate SAM that can somehow
be temporarily out of sync with the AD, or is the PDC emulator a
real-time conduit into the AD store ?

Thanks for any ideas...
Dave Fugleberg


List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode

2001-10-17 Thread Sutton, James W.

I have seen this happen with persistent mapped drives.  I don't recall the
exact details but I believe it occurred after the user changes their
password.  When the persistent drive mappings were made, the user did a
"Connect As" and supplied their user ID and password.  Now the persistent
mappings are trying to connect with the old password, causing the account to
lock out.  This may be totally off-base but is the best I can recall.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Fugleberg, David A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode


We have a mixed mode AD (Single forest/single tree/single domain), with
about 20 DCs and 35 BDCs.  Accounts are administered centrally by a very
small group, and they typically connect to the DC that holds the PDC
FSMO to do all administrative tasks. 

Our account lockout policy locks accounts after three bad attempts.
Over the past several months, we've seen a couple strange issues with
account lockouts:
1. Once in awhile, a user will be locked out again and again for no
apparent reason.  For example, they arrive at work, attempt to login,
and are locked out.  The admins unlock the account and the user logs in,
but if you check the account later it is locked out again. If the user
then logs out, they are unable to login because of the lock.  We've seen
this happen to a given user several times over a few days, then
mysteriously disappear.  Some users have a great deal of trouble with
this; most never see it.

2. When an account is locked out, the admin will typically unlock it by
going to the account tab on the user's object in Active Directory Users
and Computers.  In some cases, however, even after doing so the user is
unable to logon.  Since these folks are old-time NT admins, they will
then often open User Manager for Domains and try unlocking the account
from there.  Strangely, they sometimes need to perform the unlock from
BOTH tools before the user is able to logon.  At first, I thought this
was just a timing issue, or that they were looking at the account info
on different servers, but I have seen with my own eyes cases where ADU&C
connected to the PDC emulator shows one lockout status, and User Manager
for Domains shows another.

I'm trying to get the admins away from User Manager for Domains
altogether, but they don't trust 'Users and Computers' in this case.
I've tried to explain that the "Nt Domain" and the "Active Directory
Domain" are the SAME THING, but they're not buying it when they see a
different view in the two tools.

My questions:
1. Is anybody else havong similar lockout problems ?  The Q articles on
the subject don't seem to apply to this scenario.
2. When an admin uses User Manager for Domains, it obviously can make
changes only at the (emulated) PDC.  Does this mean that the lockout
status it displays is the one stored on that server, or is it possible
that it's displaying status read from a BDC ?
3. Has anyone else seen a case where they had to unlock an account using
both tools before the user could login ?
4. Is there any other reason why attributes that are displayable in User
Manager for Domains should NOT be IDENTICAL to the same attributes as
displayed in Active Directory Users and Computers ?  In other words,
does the PDC emulator store this data in a separate SAM that can somehow
be temporarily out of sync with the AD, or is the PDC emulator a
real-time conduit into the AD store ?

Thanks for any ideas...
Dave Fugleberg


List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



Re: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode

2001-10-17 Thread Neil Smith

Read MS Article Q263821 for the fix

- Original Message -
From: "Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:19 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode


Actually, we have seen similar issues in our mixed mode domain. Sometimes,
it seems that there is a sync problem between pdc and bdc's. Other times, we
have no clue why it is occuring to an individual over and over again. We
have even gone so far as to delete and recreate accounts in AD for users
experiencing repeated lock-outs. The only common thread seems to have been
their accessing exchange through outlook. Users could log in after their
account was unlocked, but later in the day they would be locked out again.
Passwords were not being cached at all, and it was almost always a Win2kPro
box that the user was logging on through. I am uncertain as to the exact
cause(s), but recreating the user object has resolved the issues for users
experiencing this.

-Original Message-
From: Fugleberg, David A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode


We have a mixed mode AD (Single forest/single tree/single domain), with
about 20 DCs and 35 BDCs.  Accounts are administered centrally by a very
small group, and they typically connect to the DC that holds the PDC
FSMO to do all administrative tasks.

Our account lockout policy locks accounts after three bad attempts.
Over the past several months, we've seen a couple strange issues with
account lockouts:
1. Once in awhile, a user will be locked out again and again for no
apparent reason.  For example, they arrive at work, attempt to login,
and are locked out.  The admins unlock the account and the user logs in,
but if you check the account later it is locked out again. If the user
then logs out, they are unable to login because of the lock.  We've seen
this happen to a given user several times over a few days, then
mysteriously disappear.  Some users have a great deal of trouble with
this; most never see it.

2. When an account is locked out, the admin will typically unlock it by
going to the account tab on the user's object in Active Directory Users
and Computers.  In some cases, however, even after doing so the user is
unable to logon.  Since these folks are old-time NT admins, they will
then often open User Manager for Domains and try unlocking the account
from there.  Strangely, they sometimes need to perform the unlock from
BOTH tools before the user is able to logon.  At first, I thought this
was just a timing issue, or that they were looking at the account info
on different servers, but I have seen with my own eyes cases where ADU&C
connected to the PDC emulator shows one lockout status, and User Manager
for Domains shows another.

I'm trying to get the admins away from User Manager for Domains
altogether, but they don't trust 'Users and Computers' in this case.
I've tried to explain that the "Nt Domain" and the "Active Directory
Domain" are the SAME THING, but they're not buying it when they see a
different view in the two tools.

My questions:
1. Is anybody else havong similar lockout problems ?  The Q articles on
the subject don't seem to apply to this scenario.
2. When an admin uses User Manager for Domains, it obviously can make
changes only at the (emulated) PDC.  Does this mean that the lockout
status it displays is the one stored on that server, or is it possible
that it's displaying status read from a BDC ?
3. Has anyone else seen a case where they had to unlock an account using
both tools before the user could login ?
4. Is there any other reason why attributes that are displayable in User
Manager for Domains should NOT be IDENTICAL to the same attributes as
displayed in Active Directory Users and Computers ?  In other words,
does the PDC emulator store this data in a separate SAM that can somehow
be temporarily out of sync with the AD, or is the PDC emulator a
real-time conduit into the AD store ?

Thanks for any ideas...
Dave Fugleberg


List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode

2001-10-17 Thread Blair, James


You are not alone. Once we rolled out group policy we had the same thing
happen. I have found in testing that if you utilise the "Default Domain
Group Policy" and then import the compatws.inf security template (amend as
required) this seems to "minimalise" but not eradicate the problem. For the
stalwarts that still experience lockout look at their accounts and goto
Active Directory Users and Computers, goto the Accounts tab, make sure that
Password Never Expires is ticked and that the User logon name and User logon
name (pre windows 2000) are both "filled in"...once this is done reset their
password to something totally different. Within the scope of your Group
Policy I would also advise that you separate the IT User Accounts and the
servers that are not DC's and apply a new group policy to that group with
"No Override" and "Block Inheritance". There is a great tool out there to
test Resultant Policy FAZAM RFV, not full version but free...
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/tools/existing/fazam200
0-o.asp

Also a great "Free book" on group policy, have to register but well worth
it, have received no "junk mail" as yet as a result of registering:
http://www.fullarmor.com/ebook/read/ . 

James

-Original Message-
From: Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2001 1:20 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode


Actually, we have seen similar issues in our mixed mode domain. Sometimes,
it seems that there is a sync problem between pdc and bdc's. Other times, we
have no clue why it is occuring to an individual over and over again. We
have even gone so far as to delete and recreate accounts in AD for users
experiencing repeated lock-outs. The only common thread seems to have been
their accessing exchange through outlook. Users could log in after their
account was unlocked, but later in the day they would be locked out again.
Passwords were not being cached at all, and it was almost always a Win2kPro
box that the user was logging on through. I am uncertain as to the exact
cause(s), but recreating the user object has resolved the issues for users
experiencing this.

-Original Message-
From: Fugleberg, David A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Account Lockouts in mixed mode


We have a mixed mode AD (Single forest/single tree/single domain), with
about 20 DCs and 35 BDCs.  Accounts are administered centrally by a very
small group, and they typically connect to the DC that holds the PDC
FSMO to do all administrative tasks. 

Our account lockout policy locks accounts after three bad attempts.
Over the past several months, we've seen a couple strange issues with
account lockouts:
1. Once in awhile, a user will be locked out again and again for no
apparent reason.  For example, they arrive at work, attempt to login,
and are locked out.  The admins unlock the account and the user logs in,
but if you check the account later it is locked out again. If the user
then logs out, they are unable to login because of the lock.  We've seen
this happen to a given user several times over a few days, then
mysteriously disappear.  Some users have a great deal of trouble with
this; most never see it.

2. When an account is locked out, the admin will typically unlock it by
going to the account tab on the user's object in Active Directory Users
and Computers.  In some cases, however, even after doing so the user is
unable to logon.  Since these folks are old-time NT admins, they will
then often open User Manager for Domains and try unlocking the account
from there.  Strangely, they sometimes need to perform the unlock from
BOTH tools before the user is able to logon.  At first, I thought this
was just a timing issue, or that they were looking at the account info
on different servers, but I have seen with my own eyes cases where ADU&C
connected to the PDC emulator shows one lockout status, and User Manager
for Domains shows another.

I'm trying to get the admins away from User Manager for Domains
altogether, but they don't trust 'Users and Computers' in this case.
I've tried to explain that the "Nt Domain" and the "Active Directory
Domain" are the SAME THING, but they're not buying it when they see a
different view in the two tools.

My questions:
1. Is anybody else havong similar lockout problems ?  The Q articles on
the subject don't seem to apply to this scenario.
2. When an admin uses User Manager for Domains, it obviously can make
changes only at the (emulated) PDC.  Does this mean that the lockout
status it displays is the one stored on that server, or is it possible
that it's displaying status read from a BDC ?
3. Has anyone else seen a case where they had to un