RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
ROFL Brilliant. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ --- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:01 AM To: ActiveDir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I quite like the oxymoron - Attacking Defending Security Infrastructures Perhaps we could call it - ADSI for short? -Original Message- From: Mark Parris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:17:04 To:ActiveDir.org ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I did indeed, but I was trying to introduce another acronym to the IT almanac, Defending Security Infrastructures DSI it is then. Boss, Boss, the DSI boss. -Original Message- From: Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:01:49 To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I think you meant Defending Security Infrastructures (“DSI”): Las Vegas. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:56 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I can see a TV Show emerging here DSI (Las Vegas) If he was still alive Herve Villechaiz could have played the lead, he used to be on Fantasy Island (Tattoo) and the man with the Golden Gun (Nick Nack). From: joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 July 2006 16:27 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Oh F^%. I apologize in front of everyone for mispelling your name AGAIN, neil. I was so worked up over the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures that everything other than the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures completely slipped through my mind. Of course this would be much easier if you simply changed your first name to Neal then I would be right when I was wrong so when dicussing topics such as Defending Security Infrastructures I would not mess up the spelling on your name. Again, I humbly ask your forgiveness[1] and apologize profusely and blame it all on the lack of definition of the term Defending Security Infrastructures[2]. So before I go on too much more about Defending Security Infrastructures and the webpage at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ which tells you absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures, I will now close this note on Defending Security Infrastructures. joe [1] That is serious. No excuse neil, I am quite sorry. [2] Err so is that, but not as serious as [1] above. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ --- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:27 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ that worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures located at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/. And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked for you to comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security Infrastructures This is neither the time to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the place to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures. I personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro and Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and of course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as well. joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ --- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing
Re: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
I did indeed, but I was trying to introduce another acronym to the IT almanac, Defending Security Infrastructures DSI it is then. Boss, Boss, the DSI boss. -Original Message- From: Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:01:49 To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I think you meant Defending Security Infrastructures (“DSI”): Las Vegas. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:56 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I can see a TV Show emerging here DSI (Las Vegas) If he was still alive Herve Villechaiz could have played the lead, he used to be on Fantasy Island (Tattoo) and the man with the Golden Gun (Nick Nack). From: joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 July 2006 16:27 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Oh F^%. I apologize in front of everyone for mispelling your name AGAIN, neil. I was so worked up over the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures that everything other than the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures completely slipped through my mind. Of course this would be much easier if you simply changed your first name to Neal then I would be right when I was wrong so when dicussing topics such as Defending Security Infrastructures I would not mess up the spelling on your name. Again, I humbly ask your forgiveness[1] and apologize profusely and blame it all on the lack of definition of the term Defending Security Infrastructures[2]. So before I go on too much more about Defending Security Infrastructures and the webpage at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ which tells you absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures, I will now close this note on Defending Security Infrastructures. joe [1] That is serious. No excuse neil, I am quite sorry. [2] Err so is that, but not as serious as [1] above. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ --- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:27 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ that worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures located at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/. And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked for you to comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security Infrastructures This is neither the time to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the place to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures. I personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro and Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and of course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as well. joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ --- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:38 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau So we can defend our security infras using either of 2 vapourware solutions now :) cool! Mr Tandon was there before you tho, joe :-^ neil From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: 12 July 2006 03:51 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose this information to anyone. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read
Re: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
I quite like the oxymoron - Attacking Defending Security Infrastructures Perhaps we could call it - ADSI for short? -Original Message- From: Mark Parris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:17:04 To:ActiveDir.org ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I did indeed, but I was trying to introduce another acronym to the IT almanac, Defending Security Infrastructures DSI it is then. Boss, Boss, the DSI boss. -Original Message- From: Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:01:49 To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I think you meant Defending Security Infrastructures (“DSI”): Las Vegas. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:56 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I can see a TV Show emerging here DSI (Las Vegas) If he was still alive Herve Villechaiz could have played the lead, he used to be on Fantasy Island (Tattoo) and the man with the Golden Gun (Nick Nack). From: joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 July 2006 16:27 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Oh F^%. I apologize in front of everyone for mispelling your name AGAIN, neil. I was so worked up over the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures that everything other than the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures completely slipped through my mind. Of course this would be much easier if you simply changed your first name to Neal then I would be right when I was wrong so when dicussing topics such as Defending Security Infrastructures I would not mess up the spelling on your name. Again, I humbly ask your forgiveness[1] and apologize profusely and blame it all on the lack of definition of the term Defending Security Infrastructures[2]. So before I go on too much more about Defending Security Infrastructures and the webpage at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ which tells you absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures, I will now close this note on Defending Security Infrastructures. joe [1] That is serious. No excuse neil, I am quite sorry. [2] Err so is that, but not as serious as [1] above. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ --- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:27 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ that worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures located at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/. And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked for you to comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security Infrastructures This is neither the time to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the place to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures. I personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro and Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and of course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as well. joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ --- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:38 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau So we can defend our security infras using either of 2 vapourware solutions now :) cool! Mr Tandon was there before you tho, joe :-^ neil From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent
RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
So we can defend our security infras using either of 2
vapourware solutions now :) cool!
Mr Tandon was there before you tho, joe
:-^
neil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: 12 July 2006 03:51To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner]
[OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose
this information to anyone.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
Do not
read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/---
I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security
Infrastructures.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
MurraySent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:56 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] OOFs
from Steven Comeau
Hi all
I have temporarily suspended Steven Comeaus subscription,
which should stop the out of office replies hitting the list.
Tony
This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.
PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,
or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc
does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies.
RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ
that worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures located at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/.
And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked for you to
comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security
Infrastructures
This is neither the time
to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the place to discuss Defending
Security Infrastructures.
I
personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures
space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro and
Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and of
course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security
Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a
key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so
I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as
well.
joe
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
Do not
read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely
nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:38
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir]
[List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
So we can defend our security infras using either of 2
vapourware solutions now :) cool!
Mr Tandon was there before you tho, joe
:-^
neil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: 12 July 2006 03:51To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner]
[OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose
this information to anyone.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
Do not
read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/---
I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security
Infrastructures.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
MurraySent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:56 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] OOFs
from Steven Comeau
Hi all
I have temporarily suspended Steven Comeaus subscription,
which should stop the out of office replies hitting the list.
Tony
This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.
PLEASE READ: The
information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the
named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this
email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your
system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance
on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International
plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept
responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,
or (b) the presence
of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this
message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then
please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is
not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research;
(2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do
not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational
purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell
securities or related financial instruments. NIplc
does not provide
investment services to private customers. Authorised and
regulated by the
Financial Services Authority. Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No.
447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP. A
member of the Nomura group of companies.
Re: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
I see there is an opening for a CEO too!
-Original Message-
From: joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:26:39
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ that worthless blog entry
on Defending Security Infrastructures located at
http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/
http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/.
And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked
for you to comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security
Infrastructures
This is neither the time to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the
place to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures.
I personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures
space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro
and Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and
of course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security
Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a
key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so
I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as well.
joe
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm:
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures -
http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/
http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ --- I'm serious, you will learn
absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:38 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
So we can defend our security infras using either of 2 vapourware solutions now
:) cool!
Mr Tandon was there before you tho, joe :-^
neil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: 12 July 2006 03:51
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose this information to
anyone.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm:
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures -
http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/:
http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/ --- I'm serious, you will learn
absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:56 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] OOFs from Steven Comeau
Hi all
I have temporarily suspended Steven Comeau’s subscription, which should stop
the out of office replies hitting the list.
Tony
This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately,
destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose
anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not
designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions
Act 2002.
PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your
copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,
accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,
or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling
code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this
email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated
this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,
investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended
for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or
offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc
does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England
no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,
London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group
RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
Oh F^%. I apologize in front of everyone for mispelling your name AGAIN, neil. I was so worked up over the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures that everything other than the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures completely slipped through my mind. Of course this would be much easier if you simply changed your first name to Neal then I would be right when I was wrong so when dicussing topics such as Defending Security Infrastructures I would not mess up the spelling on your name. Again, I humbly ask your forgiveness[1] and apologize profusely and blame it all on the lack of definitionof the termDefending Security Infrastructures[2]. So before I go on too much more about Defending Security Infrastructures and the webpage at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/which tells you absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures, I will now close this note on Defending Security Infrastructures. joe [1] That is serious. No excuse neil, I am quite sorry. [2] Err so is that, but not as serious as [1] above. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:27 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ that worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures located at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/. And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked for you to comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security Infrastructures This is neither the time to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the place to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures. I personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro and Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and of course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as well. joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:38 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau So we can defend our security infras using either of 2 vapourware solutions now :) cool! Mr Tandon was there before you tho, joe :-^ neil From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: 12 July 2006 03:51To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose this information to anyone. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony MurraySent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:56 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] OOFs from Steven Comeau Hi all I have temporarily suspended Steven Comeaus subscription, which should stop the out of office replies hitting the list. Tony This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002. PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and Nomura
RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
I can see a TV Show emerging here DSI (Las Vegas)If he was still aliveHerve Villechaiz could have played the lead, he used to be on Fantasy Island (Tattoo)and the man with the Golden Gun (Nick Nack). From: "joe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 12 July 2006 16:27To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Oh F^%. I apologize in front of everyone for mispelling your name AGAIN, neil. I was so worked up over the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures that everything other than the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures completely slipped through my mind. Of course this would be much easier if you simply changed your first name to Neal then I would be right when I was wrong so when dicussing topics such as Defending Security Infrastructures I would not mess up the spelling on your name. Again, I humbly ask your forgiveness[1] and apologize profusely and blame it all on the lack of definitionof the termDefending Security Infrastructures[2]. So before I go on too much more about Defending Security Infrastructures and the webpage at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/which tells you absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures, I will now close this note on Defending Security Infrastructures. joe [1] That is serious. No excuse neil, I am quite sorry. [2] Err so is that, but not as serious as [1] above. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures.From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:27 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ that worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures located at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/. And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked for you to comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security Infrastructures This is neither the time to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the place to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures. I personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro and Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and of course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as well. joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:38 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau So we can defend our security infras using either of 2 vapourware solutions now :) cool! Mr Tandon was there before you tho, joe :-^ neil From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: 12 July 2006 03:51To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose this information to anyone.-- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony MurraySent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:56 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] OOFs from Steven Comeau Hi all I have temporarily suspended Steven Comeaus subscription, which should stop the out of office replies hitting the list. Tony This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002. PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and intended for
RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
LOL. It's a refreshing change to see my (simple?) first name spelt wrongly, rather than my last name. :) I sense some angst against a certain Mr Tandon... ??? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: 12 July 2006 15:54To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Oh F^%. I apologize in front of everyone for mispelling your name AGAIN, neil. I was so worked up over the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures that everything other than the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures completely slipped through my mind. Of course this would be much easier if you simply changed your first name to Neal then I would be right when I was wrong so when dicussing topics such as Defending Security Infrastructures I would not mess up the spelling on your name. Again, I humbly ask your forgiveness[1] and apologize profusely and blame it all on the lack of definitionof the termDefending Security Infrastructures[2]. So before I go on too much more about Defending Security Infrastructures and the webpage at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/which tells you absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures, I will now close this note on Defending Security Infrastructures. joe [1] That is serious. No excuse neil, I am quite sorry. [2] Err so is that, but not as serious as [1] above. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:27 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ that worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures located at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/. And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked for you to comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security Infrastructures This is neither the time to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the place to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures. I personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro and Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and of course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as well. joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:38 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau So we can defend our security infras using either of 2 vapourware solutions now :) cool! Mr Tandon was there before you tho, joe :-^ neil From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: 12 July 2006 03:51To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose this information to anyone. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony MurraySent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:56 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] OOFs from Steven Comeau Hi all I have temporarily suspended Steven Comeaus subscription, which should stop the out of office replies hitting the list. Tony This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002. PLEASE READ: The information
RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
No angst here. I think Sanjay is fine. I think he hasideas that are a bit off though. From the recent influx of notes in my inbox I don't appear to be completely isolated in these thoughts. I intend to blog something on the topic in the next week or so as I properly put into words my thoughts and comments on the topic of updating one of my blog posts from one year ago. In the meanwhile, anyone who has received a visit to their corporation from saidindividual, I would be interested to hear what the value of the visit was and the thoughts on what was discussed. Any humourous stories I would also love to hear as I have already heard some doozies already in addition to my own that I experienced personally. In the meanwhile, I want to become the undisputed search engine lead on the markitecture of Defending Security Infrastructures because Defending Security Infrastructuresis extremely important, I think, and having the top hitson the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures certainly says something about Defending Security Infrastructures. Whatever that is, I am not entirely sure, but it does comprise what we know about Defending Security Infrastructures. Thanks to all who have posted their comments on the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures at my worthless blog entry on the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/. :o) joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:19 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau LOL. It's a refreshing change to see my (simple?) first name spelt wrongly, rather than my last name. :) I sense some angst against a certain Mr Tandon... ??? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: 12 July 2006 15:54To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Oh F^%. I apologize in front of everyone for mispelling your name AGAIN, neil. I was so worked up over the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures that everything other than the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures completely slipped through my mind. Of course this would be much easier if you simply changed your first name to Neal then I would be right when I was wrong so when dicussing topics such as Defending Security Infrastructures I would not mess up the spelling on your name. Again, I humbly ask your forgiveness[1] and apologize profusely and blame it all on the lack of definitionof the termDefending Security Infrastructures[2]. So before I go on too much more about Defending Security Infrastructures and the webpage at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/which tells you absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures, I will now close this note on Defending Security Infrastructures. joe [1] That is serious. No excuse neil, I am quite sorry. [2] Err so is that, but not as serious as [1] above. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:27 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ that worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures located at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/. And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked for you to comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security Infrastructures This is neither the time to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the place to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures. I personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro and Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and of course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as well. joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do
RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
I think you meant Defending Security Infrastructures (DSI): Las Vegas. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:56 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau I can see a TV Show emerging here DSI (Las Vegas) If he was still aliveHerve Villechaiz could have played the lead, he used to be on Fantasy Island (Tattoo)and the man with the Golden Gun (Nick Nack). From: joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 July 2006 16:27 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Oh F^%. I apologize in front of everyone for mispelling your name AGAIN, neil. I was so worked up over the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures that everything other than the topic of Defending Security Infrastructures completely slipped through my mind. Of course this would be much easier if you simply changed your first name to Neal then I would be right when I was wrong so when dicussing topics such as Defending Security Infrastructures I would not mess up the spelling on your name. Again, I humbly ask your forgiveness[1] and apologize profusely and blame it all on the lack of definitionof the termDefending Security Infrastructures[2]. So before I go on too much more about Defending Security Infrastructures and the webpage at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/which tells you absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures, I will now close this note on Defending Security Infrastructures. joe [1] That is serious. No excuse neil, I am quite sorry. [2] Err so is that, but not as serious as [1] above. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:27 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Neal, you totally misunderstood. I said DO NOT READ that worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures located at http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/. And then if you read the blog on Defending Security Infrastructures, I asked for you to comment to the blog your thoughts on Defending Security Infrastructures This is neither the time to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures nor the place to discuss Defending Security Infrastructures. I personally haven't fully stepped into the Defending Security Infrastructures space yet, though if I did I would probably look to the fine folks at NetPro and Quest first to see their ideas on Defending Security Infrastructures, and of course I would be obligated to look at Microsoft's Defending Security Infrastructures solutions and also as mentioned in one of the blog comments, a key portion of the Defending Security Infrastructures solution would be GPOs so I would look to GPOGuy for Defending Security Infrastructures products as well. joe -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:38 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau So we can defend our security infras using either of 2 vapourware solutions now :) cool! Mr Tandon was there before you tho, joe :-^ neil From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: 12 July 2006 03:51 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose this information to anyone. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:56 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] OOFs from Steven Comeau Hi all I have temporarily suspended Steven Comeaus subscription, which should stop the out of office replies
RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose this information to anyone. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony MurraySent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:56 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] OOFs from Steven Comeau Hi all I have temporarily suspended Steven Comeaus subscription, which should stop the out of office replies hitting the list. Tony This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.
RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau
As of the end of next week you wont have to put up with it any longer. Im moving on. J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, 12 July 2006 2:51 p.m. To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] [OT] OOFs from Steven Comeau Gotta love that signature Tony... I promise not to disclose this information to anyone. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm Do not read this worthless blog entry on Defending Security Infrastructures - http://blog.joeware.net/2006/07/11/445/--- I'm serious, you will learn absolutely nothing about Defending Security Infrastructures. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:56 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] [List Owner] OOFs from Steven Comeau Hi all I have temporarily suspended Steven Comeaus subscription, which should stop the out of office replies hitting the list. Tony This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.
