Re: Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data
Eric, Since you are using the TDP for Domino connect agent to perform the backups, you can not use backup sets for restore. You have explained the steps you are trying to do, but haven't really stated what business need you are trying to fulfill. Why do you want an extra copy of the domino databases? Is it to provide redundancy in case of a restore? If so, a copy storage pool would be a better alternative? Once again, currently only the backup archive client is aware and can take advantage of backupsets. To the server, active versions of files look all the same (it's just data), so you can generate backupsets of api data. But it is a waste of a tape since you will not be able to restore from it in any situation. James Thompson - Original Message - From: "Eric Lindbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 2:38 PM Subject: Re: Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data Hi James, Thanks for the response. Here's what we're trying to do: 1) Using TDP for Domino, backup our domino databases from a Solaris client to TSM using the "domdsmc selective * ..." command. 2) Then, on the server side, issue "generate backupset ..." to dump the active versions of the databases to a manual tape stacker. 3) At this point, I can see the backupset from the server, but not from the client. The backupset still resides in the library on the TSM server. Just got off the phone with TSM support. According to them, when you create a backupset of data that was backed up via an API (Domino, in our case), all the data is smushed together into one big object. That object is in a format that the B/A client cannot understand, making the restore impossible. So, if it even makes a difference, I must have missed something along the way to not be able to see the backupsets from the client in the first place. My only recourse is to create a copy storage pool, it seems. Any other options? I should mention that I've had absolutely no problems getting backupsets to work on our NT filesystem data. Thanks, Eric L James Thompson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 01/19/01 02:47 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Only files that are backed up using a 'dsmc incremental ' or 'dsmc selective' and only the active versions of those files are included in a backupset. If you backed the domino databases up as file using the backup/archive client, you should be able to use a backupset generated from that filespace to restore the files. Are you using a windows client or unix? Can you query the backupset from the server and from the client machine? Are you trying to restore the backupset while it is still assigned to the TSM server? Or are you moving the backupset volumes to the local machine and trying it from there? James Thompson >From: Eric Lindbeck >Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data >Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:08:59 -0500 > >Greetings *SM'ers, > >I'm looking for clarification of APAR IC28451. It states that: >"There is no support in the [TDP for Domino] API for the backup set >format. Therefore, backup set data that was backed up via the API >cannot be restored or used." > >Does this mean that it's not possible to restore the Domino database >files at all, even if you just want to treat them like generic file >system files and do the restore via a B/A client? > >I've been trying unsuccessfully to do the restore of Domino BackupSet >data-- the B/A client doesn't seem to know that a BackupSet even >exists. But I'm hoping that it's just a problem with my client >software version (3.7.2). Does anyone else have experience with this? > > Thanks in advance, > Eric S. Lindbeck > Data Storage Administrator > Network Infrastructure Services > SCT Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Re: Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data
Hi James, Thanks for the response. Here's what we're trying to do: 1) Using TDP for Domino, backup our domino databases from a Solaris client to TSM using the "domdsmc selective * ..." command. 2) Then, on the server side, issue "generate backupset ..." to dump the active versions of the databases to a manual tape stacker. 3) At this point, I can see the backupset from the server, but not from the client. The backupset still resides in the library on the TSM server. Just got off the phone with TSM support. According to them, when you create a backupset of data that was backed up via an API (Domino, in our case), all the data is smushed together into one big object. That object is in a format that the B/A client cannot understand, making the restore impossible. So, if it even makes a difference, I must have missed something along the way to not be able to see the backupsets from the client in the first place. My only recourse is to create a copy storage pool, it seems. Any other options? I should mention that I've had absolutely no problems getting backupsets to work on our NT filesystem data. Thanks, Eric L James Thompson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 01/19/01 02:47 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Only files that are backed up using a 'dsmc incremental ' or 'dsmc selective' and only the active versions of those files are included in a backupset. If you backed the domino databases up as file using the backup/archive client, you should be able to use a backupset generated from that filespace to restore the files. Are you using a windows client or unix? Can you query the backupset from the server and from the client machine? Are you trying to restore the backupset while it is still assigned to the TSM server? Or are you moving the backupset volumes to the local machine and trying it from there? James Thompson >From: Eric Lindbeck >Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data >Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:08:59 -0500 > >Greetings *SM'ers, > >I'm looking for clarification of APAR IC28451. It states that: >"There is no support in the [TDP for Domino] API for the backup set >format. Therefore, backup set data that was backed up via the API >cannot be restored or used." > >Does this mean that it's not possible to restore the Domino database >files at all, even if you just want to treat them like generic file >system files and do the restore via a B/A client? > >I've been trying unsuccessfully to do the restore of Domino BackupSet >data-- the B/A client doesn't seem to know that a BackupSet even >exists. But I'm hoping that it's just a problem with my client >software version (3.7.2). Does anyone else have experience with this? > > Thanks in advance, > Eric S. Lindbeck > Data Storage Administrator > Network Infrastructure Services > SCT Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Re: Checkin on shared SCSI Library in SAN
Thanks everyone for your suggestions. Apparently library sharing is not very well understood or documented, even by Tivoli support. The solution turns out to be quite simple though. Just do a bulk checkin of the library clients tapes from the library manager. This will check the tapes in a private and assign the library manager as the owner. Once you've checked in all of your tapes, simply run an audit of the library from the library client. Note, this will not really do an audit of the library but it will sync the database for the library with the library clients database which assigns the proper ownership to the volumes. I'm not sure why Tivoli makes you take this extra step when it would be so much cleaner to assign ownership correctly at checkin, but they say that is how the product is designed to operate. Thanks again. Seth Forgosh -Original Message- From: Forgosh, Seth Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Checkin on shared SCSI Library in SAN How can I checkin a large number of tapes to my shared SCSI library when it is a shared library? CHECKIN LIBV SEARCH=BULK STATUS=PRI CHECKL=B OWNER=servername returns an error saying that this option is not supported on SCSI libraries. I've got two distinct sets of active tapes that need to get checked in and assigned to the proper TSM server. TIA Seth Forgosh
Re: Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data
Only files that are backed up using a 'dsmc incremental ' or 'dsmc selective' and only the active versions of those files are included in a backupset. If you backed the domino databases up as file using the backup/archive client, you should be able to use a backupset generated from that filespace to restore the files. Are you using a windows client or unix? Can you query the backupset from the server and from the client machine? Are you trying to restore the backupset while it is still assigned to the TSM server? Or are you moving the backupset volumes to the local machine and trying it from there? James Thompson >From: Eric Lindbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data >Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:08:59 -0500 > >Greetings *SM'ers, > >I'm looking for clarification of APAR IC28451. It states that: >"There is no support in the [TDP for Domino] API for the backup set >format. Therefore, backup set data that was backed up via the API >cannot be restored or used." > >Does this mean that it's not possible to restore the Domino database >files at all, even if you just want to treat them like generic file >system files and do the restore via a B/A client? > >I've been trying unsuccessfully to do the restore of Domino BackupSet >data-- the B/A client doesn't seem to know that a BackupSet even >exists. But I'm hoping that it's just a problem with my client >software version (3.7.2). Does anyone else have experience with this? > > Thanks in advance, > Eric S. Lindbeck > Data Storage Administrator > Network Infrastructure Services > SCT Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Cost of select media vs volumes
Greetings, Oh Massed Experience and Intellect! Which costs more, select from media or select from volumes? Or are they similar enough to flip a coin? I am trying to write a script in which I need to know which storage pool a given tape belongs to. Looking at the list of columns, it looks like I can select stgpool_name from volumes where volume_name='$volume_name' or select stgpool_name from media where volume_name='$volume_name' When I run both commands alone, select from media seems to return a quarter second faster, but that is pretty skimpy evidence timex says it depends on cached data I'll use select from media unless there is a better way. Platform is ADSM 3.1.2.20 on AIX 4.? TIA, Kai.
Orphaned Oracle backups
hi, Yes, that happens a lot. Oracle had a bug that it deleted the backups from the catalog database even we returned error to them. I don't exactly remember which Oracle level. Other factors are how you set up your management class, copy groups and whether your node has backup delete access or not. regards, Thiha >Today I have compared the backup files on TSM with the file references in >the Oracle catalog. I discovered a lot of "orphaned" backup files: files in >TSM which are not in the Oracle catalog. >I had to delete these files manually by using the undocumented DELETE OBJECT >0 command. >Has anybody done the same thing and did you also discover irregularities? >Has anybody found the cause or know how to prevent this? >Thanks for your reply in advance!
Re: IBM 35xx Libraries, Windows 2000 and TSM - Observations
Mike, We are running on Windows NT so we're stuck with RSM. That was a level of abstraction that I didn't need! We are, however, running this library through a SAN Data Gateway. Latest word is that the testing that has been completed was done using a different SDG than the one at the customer site. They're trying to decide what to do: make the one the customer has work or get them the other one. This system is pretty strange. We are able to control the library and apparently label tapes, but no label is actually being written on the tape. The PMR number is 05100 so you can check out what has happened so far. We're working with an excellent Level 2 guy whom you undoubtedly know: Chet Tuttle. It works when directly connected via SCSI, but won't work through the fiber. I'm sure we'll get it, but it has taken way too long to make this work. Is SAN ready? I think not. The saga continues and thanks for your help. Kelly Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. PO Box 51313 Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313 (719) 531-5926 Fax: (240) 539-7175 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.storsol.com www.storserver.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Collins Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IBM 35xx Libraries, Windows 2000 and TSM - Observations Hi Kelly, The folks working in that area tell me that 8 character labels are supported w/ LTO. Label libvol doesn't work with RSM though so it's not clear if you're still talking about a Windows environment. It's suggested that you open up a problem report if you're still not able to get things working. Kelly Lipp writes: > Excellent! Let the tape boys so the drive drivers, but let you TSM guys do > the library. Leaving it to Microsoft is a real bad idea! > > While we're on this topic: > > I'm having trouble getting tapes to label properly in a 3584. The barcodes > on the tapes (provided with the IBM tapes) have eight characters. label > libvol appears to label them correctly, but when attempts are made to use > the tapes we're getting an I/O error reading the labels. Are we limited to > six characters? If so, why do the LTO specified labels have eight > characters (six useful ones with the last two being L1)? Any ideas how to > work around this short of using a magic marker to wipe out the L1? > > Thanks, > > Kelly > Best Regards, Mike Collins Tivoli Storage Manager Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: maintenance window/database backup
Definitely prior to halt and your system maintenance, because if the changes made to the system destroy something from your TSM structure... You will be able to restore from that last DataBase backup. Also you might want to monitor this DB backup, make sure it finishes successfully, and write down yr Volume Serial (Volser) number just in case... What about System Backups (AIX: sysback, mksysb) ? depending how important is the changes made to the system you might want to take a system backup as well. Cheers. Othonas Xixis "Malloy, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 01/19/2001 11:04:22 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: maintenance window/database backup New to the TSM environment,,,so thanks for the forum and thanks in advance for any assistance. We have a maintenance window carved out roughly between 14:00 and 18:00. Maintenance to our storage environment next week, which facilitates a TSM down between those hours. Should I perform that DB-BACKUP prior to the 14:00 HALT or run the DB-BACKUP after I bring the system back up?
Re: IBM 35xx Libraries, Windows 2000 and TSM - Observations
Hi Kelly, The folks working in that area tell me that 8 character labels are supported w/ LTO. Label libvol doesn't work with RSM though so it's not clear if you're still talking about a Windows environment. It's suggested that you open up a problem report if you're still not able to get things working. Kelly Lipp writes: > Excellent! Let the tape boys so the drive drivers, but let you TSM guys do > the library. Leaving it to Microsoft is a real bad idea! > > While we're on this topic: > > I'm having trouble getting tapes to label properly in a 3584. The barcodes > on the tapes (provided with the IBM tapes) have eight characters. label > libvol appears to label them correctly, but when attempts are made to use > the tapes we're getting an I/O error reading the labels. Are we limited to > six characters? If so, why do the LTO specified labels have eight > characters (six useful ones with the last two being L1)? Any ideas how to > work around this short of using a magic marker to wipe out the L1? > > Thanks, > > Kelly > Best Regards, Mike Collins Tivoli Storage Manager Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2
Excellent! Thanks for the Update Mike. I just opened a problem yesterday with Tivoli on no custom dsm.opt being installed when using W2K Group Policy! Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg -Original Message- From: Mike Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2 Hi Wayne, Arthur, and others having this problem., This is a bug in 4.1.2 and will be fixed in an upcoming ptf. An apar will or recently has been opened on this although I'm not sure on the number. Installshield installscript custom actions were causing other problems and so they were removed and replaced with other methods. The support for custom options was accidentally removed in the process.The feature will be reinstated soon. Along these lines we're working on improved w2k group policy support and windows rollout issues in general. I'm interested in profiling some customer sites who are doing this type of thing on w2k. If you would like to provide this type of input please e-mail me directly with a description of your environment and rollout strategy. Best Regards, Mike Collins Tivoli Storage Manager Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backupset Restore of TDP Domino Data
Greetings *SM'ers, I'm looking for clarification of APAR IC28451. It states that: "There is no support in the [TDP for Domino] API for the backup set format. Therefore, backup set data that was backed up via the API cannot be restored or used." Does this mean that it's not possible to restore the Domino database files at all, even if you just want to treat them like generic file system files and do the restore via a B/A client? I've been trying unsuccessfully to do the restore of Domino BackupSet data-- the B/A client doesn't seem to know that a BackupSet even exists. But I'm hoping that it's just a problem with my client software version (3.7.2). Does anyone else have experience with this? Thanks in advance, Eric S. Lindbeck Data Storage Administrator Network Infrastructure Services SCT
Re: TSM 3.7 and Netware 5.1
Well, sure seen that last statement before! Our environment is ADSM 3.1.2.50 on OS\390 but I think the anomalies of Netware and *SM cover the spectrum. I would heartily recommend the new TSA/SMDR package from Novell. It seems to have helped considerably on our 5.0/5.1 boxes. You don't mention which client you're running. I've settled on the 4.1.1_18 version. The combination of that client and the new nlms have cured a number of situations where abends created by the dsmc process were occuring. Also seems to have cured (may be too early to really tell on this one) a situation where dsmc and smdr were loosing each other sporadically and all the dsmc related nlms were having to be unloaded and reloaded. My experience with some 20 Netware boxes and slew of different clients (ADSM and TSM) is that there is going to be a certain amount of babysitting involved no matter what, although things seem to be improving (knock on wood!) Good luck and feel free to let me know if you need anything more specific. -- Jim Kirkman AIS - Systems UNC-Chapel Hill 966-5884 Brecton Whitten wrote: > *SM group, > > If there is anyone running TSM 3.7 on AIX4.3 > and backing up Netware 5.1 servers and would > be willing to talk to me about their experiences, > I would greatly appreciate it. We are seeing TSM > crashing and abending Netware servers. I have seen > some of the posts referring to new TSA patches from > Novell, but our server group is not ready to implement > these yet. We back up AIX, NT, 95-98, 2000 and Solaris > with no problems. We only have trouble with Netware. > Thanks in advance... > >Brec Whitten
maintenance window/database backup
New to the TSM environment,,,so thanks for the forum and thanks in advance for any assistance. We have a maintenance window carved out roughly between 14:00 and 18:00. Maintenance to our storage environment next week, which facilitates a TSM down between those hours. Should I perform that DB-BACKUP prior to the 14:00 HALT or run the DB-BACKUP after I bring the system back up?
Re: IBM 35xx Libraries, Windows 2000 and TSM - Observations
Hi Petr, Yes, this support is scheduled to go out in an upcoming ptf but no specific date is available yet. Petr Pøerost writes: > Hi Mike, > do you plan to release it as separate PTF or part of some maintenance > release ? > Regards > Petr Best Regards, Mike Collins Tivoli Storage Manager Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2
Hi Wayne, Arthur, and others having this problem., This is a bug in 4.1.2 and will be fixed in an upcoming ptf. An apar will or recently has been opened on this although I'm not sure on the number. Installshield installscript custom actions were causing other problems and so they were removed and replaced with other methods. The support for custom options was accidentally removed in the process.The feature will be reinstated soon. Along these lines we're working on improved w2k group policy support and windows rollout issues in general. I'm interested in profiling some customer sites who are doing this type of thing on w2k. If you would like to provide this type of input please e-mail me directly with a description of your environment and rollout strategy. Wayne T. Smith writes: > Thanks to Jennifer and Arthur for discussing this TSM Windows client > bug. Some postings on ADSM-L last year suggest that the problem > may have been around since v3.7 (but I can't verify that, as we > skipped v3.7 for a number of reasons). > > We tailor our installables very much as Cornell does. None of files > DSM.OPT, dsm.opt, ba_dsm.opt, BA_DSM.OPT nor dsm.smp in the > /program files/Tivoli/TSM/config folder get copied during install of > v4.1.2. No dsm.opt or dsm.new is created on install. > > The v4.1.2 wizards are quite wonderful compared to the 10-foot long > DSMCUTIL command we used to have to force on our client > operators. This tailored DSM.OPT facility is quite important to us > however! > > Can a Tivoli person or anyone else recommend I open a PMR/APAR > on the subject, or is support aware and working on the problem? Can > I answer this question with a DB search someplace? > > Thanks, wayne > > Wayne T. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ADSM Technical Coordinator - UNET University of Maine System Best Regards, Mike Collins Tivoli Storage Manager Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TSM 3.7 and Netware 5.1
We are running with Netware 5.0 SP5 clients to 3.7 server on and having some similar problems and are awaiting some new TSA's to install and try. David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. I/T 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5525 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/19/01 10:45AM >>> *SM group, If there is anyone running TSM 3.7 on AIX4.3 and backing up Netware 5.1 servers and would be willing to talk to me about their experiences, I would greatly appreciate it. We are seeing TSM crashing and abending Netware servers. I have seen some of the posts referring to new TSA patches from Novell, but our server group is not ready to implement these yet. We back up AIX, NT, 95-98, 2000 and Solaris with no problems. We only have trouble with Netware. Thanks in advance... Brec Whitten
TSM 3.7 and Netware 5.1
*SM group, If there is anyone running TSM 3.7 on AIX4.3 and backing up Netware 5.1 servers and would be willing to talk to me about their experiences, I would greatly appreciate it. We are seeing TSM crashing and abending Netware servers. I have seen some of the posts referring to new TSA patches from Novell, but our server group is not ready to implement these yet. We back up AIX, NT, 95-98, 2000 and Solaris with no problems. We only have trouble with Netware. Thanks in advance... Brec Whitten
Re: Dsmcad
These work for me: tsmsched::once:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched > /dev/null 2>&1 tsmweb:2:once:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmcad >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/19/01 06:25AM >>> Hi all, I want to launch automatically dsmcad on Unix (AIX 4.3.3) clients. What is the solution ? When I add the following entry to the /etc/inittab file: tsm::once:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmcad > /dev/null 2>&1 # TSM Client Acceptor It's not good. (Note : tsm::once:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched > /dev/null 2>&1 # TSM Scheduler works !!). Thanks in advance ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Pour dialoguer en direct avec vos amis, Yahoo! Messenger : http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Re: Dsmcad
You need a unique name for each process. If you are already using "tsm" for the scheduler, you need to use something like "tsmweb" for the second process. We use this on all our AIX boxes running TSM with no problem. Anne Short Lockheed Martin Enterprise Information Systems Gaithersburg, Maryland 301-240-6184 CODA/I Storage Management -Original Message- From: Christophe Guerin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 6:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dsmcad Hi all, I want to launch automatically dsmcad on Unix (AIX 4.3.3) clients. What is the solution ? When I add the following entry to the /etc/inittab file: tsm::once:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmcad > /dev/null 2>&1 # TSM Client Acceptor It's not good. (Note : tsm::once:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched > /dev/null 2>&1 # TSM Scheduler works !!). Thanks in advance ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Pour dialoguer en direct avec vos amis, Yahoo! Messenger : http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Re: NT 4.0 TCPIP Comm failure
If you are sure there have been no changes then you may want to contact your network people and see if anything has changed there. Jack -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 3:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT 4.0 TCPIP Comm failure We have had several machines lately that suddenly can't talk to *SM server and vice versa. Have to reboot NT to get back. ping and other comm works o.k. These will work o.k a few days then same thing. These clients have been in production for a good while with no problem. No recent changes to them. Only messages in dsmerror is TCPIP comm failure. Server says attempting to contact node. Have many other NT, Netware & AIX clients - no problem. Using TCPIP over FORE ATM NIC. Clients NT 4.0 SP5, one with TSM 3.7.0.0, other 3.7.2.0. Server TSM 3.7.4.0 on AIX 4.3.3 Checked Tivoli site and no info on my searches. Any ideas? Thanks, David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. I/T 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5525 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dsmcad
Hi all, I want to launch automatically dsmcad on Unix (AIX 4.3.3) clients. What is the solution ? When I add the following entry to the /etc/inittab file: tsm::once:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmcad > /dev/null 2>&1 # TSM Client Acceptor It's not good. (Note : tsm::once:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched > /dev/null 2>&1 # TSM Scheduler works !!). Thanks in advance ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Pour dialoguer en direct avec vos amis, Yahoo! Messenger : http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
