Re: OLD Client Compatability with new TSM server
Dave, a gradual upgrade of the clients will work fine. I have done this many times. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (408)&(831) 332-4006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Canan Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OLD Client Compatability with new TSM server I have 2 customers that have finally gotten around to upgrading their servers from ADSM to TSM. The first customer is at ADSM for AIX V2, and is going to TSM for AIX V4.1 or V4.2. We are planning on upgrading all clients eventually to V4.x, but we need to find out if we have to do this IMMEDIATELY or if we can just gradually upgrade them a few at a time. Just how compatible is a V2 client with a V4 server? The second customer still has a few HP-UX V10.20 machines and is installing 4.2. The last client that was written for HP-UX V10.20 was ADSM 3.1.0.8. Will this ADSM client level work with an TSM 4.2 server? I understand the support issue - this will not be a supported configuration until all clients are at a supported level of TSM. I just want to know if it will work or not until I can get all clients upgraded to a supported level. Money is not the root of all evil - full backups are.
OLD Client Compatability with new TSM server
I have 2 customers that have finally gotten around to upgrading their servers from ADSM to TSM. The first customer is at ADSM for AIX V2, and is going to TSM for AIX V4.1 or V4.2. We are planning on upgrading all clients eventually to V4.x, but we need to find out if we have to do this IMMEDIATELY or if we can just gradually upgrade them a few at a time. Just how compatible is a V2 client with a V4 server? The second customer still has a few HP-UX V10.20 machines and is installing 4.2. The last client that was written for HP-UX V10.20 was ADSM 3.1.0.8. Will this ADSM client level work with an TSM 4.2 server? I understand the support issue - this will not be a supported configuration until all clients are at a supported level of TSM. I just want to know if it will work or not until I can get all clients upgraded to a supported level. Money is not the root of all evil - full backups are.
Re: TSM Client on W2K
if i remeber corectly it here in windows 2K HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\BackupClient cont > \Nodes\%YOURENODENAME% and a key that is named passowrd Easy peasy Jeppaneasy, Kvedja/Regards Petur Eythorsson Taeknimadur/Technician Kerfisfraedingur IR Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional Microsoft Certified System Engineer Nyherji HfSimi TEL: +354-569-7700 Borgartun 37 105 Iceland URL:http://www.nyherji.is - Original Message - From: "Patricia LeBlanc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:20 PM Subject: TSM Client on W2K > For a TSM Client on W2K..when you have "passwordaccess generate" the > password is stored in the registry on the client. > > Does anyone know where exactly in the registry this is stored?? > > Thanks > pattyleblanc > Liberty Mutual > Backup & Recovery Engineering Services
Re: Slow restores on Unix
Hi Paul Tivoli Storage Manager offers alot of tools to opimize restore and backup. If you have a high speed network you could try optimizeing the TCPnodelay parameter to YES from NO If you have enugh cpu power and enugh memorry you could try opimizing these parameters Increase the TCPWINDOWZIE parameter If you think this is a communication problem you shold consider the TCPBUFFSIZE parameter, you should be avare tha this parameter requers more memmory. If you are restoring from a multible volumes you could increase the Resourceutilization parameter. this can be wery CPU exensive. But still Paul there is no way of knowing why you have slow restores, from the information you give us. I recommend you try this and if this dosent work you should try focusing on the way you backup youre data then. you could try to backup your directorys to a disk storagepools, enable disk cache, or enable collocation for this client. Hope this helps. Tomas Eugene "What can´t happen, happens again" Kvedja/Regards Petur Eythorsson Taeknimadur/Technician Kerfisfraedingur IR Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional Microsoft Certified System Engineer Nyherji HfSimi TEL: +354-569-7700 Borgartun 37 105 Iceland URL:http://www.nyherji.is - Original Message - From: "Paul Bestow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:19 PM Subject: Slow restores on Unix > Hello Everybody, > > We have a customer which can backup up a file of 300mb and get around > 12mb/sec but then when they do a restore they only see around 2mb/sec. They > also have a number of NT machines when they backup they get around 8-9mb/sec > but the restores are the same. > > The TSM server is an NT4 box running 4.1.3 > The client machine is an IBM RS/6000 M80 (AIX 4.3.3) with a TSM client 4.1.3 > > Any help with the above would be greatly appreciated > > Cheers > > Paul > > > > > http://www.phoenixitgroup.com > **Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*** > > Phoenix IT Group Limited is registered in England and Wales under company > number 3476115. Registered Office: Technology House, Hunsbury Hill Avenue, > Northampton, NN4 8QS > > Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not > relate to the official business of our firm shall be understood as neither > given nor endorsed by it. > > No contracts may be concluded on behalf of our firm by means of email > communications. > > Confidentiality: Confidential information may be contained in this message. > If you are not the recipient indicated (or responsible for delivery of the > message to such person), you may not take any action based on it, nor should > you copy or show this to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight > the error to the sender, then delete the message from your system. > > Monitoring of Messages: Please note that we reserve the right to monitor and > intercept emails sent and received on our network. > Warning: Internet email is not 100% secure. We ask you to understand and > observe this lack of security when emailing us. We do not accept > responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent > > Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any > attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good > computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
Re: 3590 Drives via SAN in Windows 2000
The drive will autodetect if you do this. When windows 2000 autodetects the drives, go into the manage portion of the server and disable the drives. Then be sure that within Tivoli the device driver service is set to autostart. Once you reboot again you will have the name of the devices within the TSM utility. If there are any questions just let me know, we have this exact setup here. Rob Schroeder Famous Footwear
Re: error validating inserts ???
I guess it depends on the server platform. I just got the fixes to bring my OS/390 server to 4.1.4 and it contains this fix ! === Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University University Computing Center e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: 804-828-4807 "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/18/2001 11:54 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: error validating inserts ??? It's a known bug. Was discussed couple weeks ago on the list. There is no fix currently, there is an APAR out, Tivoli is working on a fix. The bug is harmless, has to do with license counting, I think, or something like that, no data at risk. Ignore it until the fix comes out. -Original Message- From: Tom Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: error validating inserts ??? Hi when im backupping/restoring Oracle databases I m seeing this output in the actlog: ANR0406I Session 9857 started for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(42551)). ANRD smnode.c(5323): Error validating inserts for event 14995. ANR0406I Session 9858 started for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(42552)). ANR0403I Session 9857 ended for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX). ANR0403I Session 9858 ended for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX). ANR0406I Session 9859 started for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(42556)). ANRD smnode.c(5323): Error validating inserts for event 14995. ANR0403I Session 9859 ended for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX). TSM server 413, Oracle DPA 2.2, API 413 Has anybody seen this, and knows the cure for it ? Thanks, Tom Smith _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Adaptive Differencing
Can anyone give me a better explanation of how Adaptive Differencing actually works with existing filespaces and volumes. Going by the White Paper I downloaded it sounds like it wants you to make a full new backup when you turn on Sub-File Differencing. Also if you use this on your local LAN have you seen marked performance improvements? Or is it more beneficial only in a dial up environment? Thanks, Varian Greenwale
3590 Drives via SAN in Windows 2000
Hello... I have the following: A windows 2000 server, a brocade switch, 3494 library manager and 3590 drives. The 3494 is conected via LAN to the W2k server. The drives are conected with fibre channel to the brocade and this conected to the server via fibre channel too. How can I define the drives in the W2k server? The server doesn't autodetect the drives. Do I need to install some driver? TIA. Jorge Rodrmguez Caracas - VenezuelaGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Re: TSM Client on W2K
HKEY_LOCAL_Machine\IBM\ADSM\NODES Kelil >From: Patricia LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: TSM Client on W2K >Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:20:58 -0400 > >For a TSM Client on W2K..when you have "passwordaccess generate" the >password is stored in the registry on the client. > >Does anyone know where exactly in the registry this is stored?? > >Thanks >pattyleblanc >Liberty Mutual >Backup & Recovery Engineering Services Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Re: TSM OS/390 DB "volumes"
Because with FDR, I can move a 3390 volume worth of data (3338 cylinders or app. 2.7GB) in about 5-7 minutes. I doubt if TSM can logically move its records in that short of a time. Jim Sporer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/18/2001 12:24 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM OS/390 DB "volumes" It's so easy to move using TSM processes, why would you want to use some other utility. The good thing about using TSM to do the move is you don't even have to take the TSM server down. All you have to do is allocate and format the new volume, then add it as a mirror and delete the old volume. Jim Sporer At 11:54 AM 9/18/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Is there anything internal for a OS/390 TSM DataBase "volume" (i.e. the >VSAM LINEAR d/s), that prevents me from moving it using a standard system >utility ? > >Could I move the linear d/s, using FDR or DSS or are there internal >location-type pointers that would destroy the DB if pyhsically moved using >non-TSM processes ? > >=== >Zoltan Forray >Virginia Commonwealth University >University Computing Center >e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >voice: 804-828-4807
When is 30% of 100 equal to 21 ?
An interesting anomoly. I did a Q STG and got the following: Storage Device EstimatedPctPct Pool NameClass NameCapacity Util Migr (MB) --- -- -- - - SPBACKUP DISK 100,921.7 30.8 30.8 Now, my simple math says that 30% utilized of 100G should be roughly 30G. However, when I started migration, I got: ANR1001I,Migration process 20 ended for storage pool SPBACKUP. ANR0986I Process 20 for MIGRATION running in the BACKGROUND processed 120840 items for a total of 22,116,016,128 bytes with a completion state of SUCCESS at 12:23:05. which is app. 21GB. No, I do not cache this stg: ANR5965I Console command: Q STG SPBACKUP F=D Storage Pool Name: SPBACKUP Storage Pool Type: Primary Device Class Name: DISK Estimated Capacity (MB): 100,921.7 Pct Util: 0.0 Pct Migr: 0.0 Pct Logical: 100.0 High Mig Pct: 85 Low Mig Pct: 30 Migration Delay: 0 Migration Continue: Yes Migration Processes: 3 Next Storage Pool: ATL3590 Reclaim Storage Pool: Maximum Size Threshold: No Limit Access: Read/Write Description: Main Disk Storage Pool Overflow Location: Cache Migrated Files?: No Collocate?: Reclamation Threshold: Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed: Delay Period for Volume Reuse: Migration in Progress?: No Amount Migrated (MB): 61,997.64 Elapsed Migration Time (seconds): 8,164 Reclamation in Progress?: Volume Being Migrated/Reclaimed: Last Update by (administrator): SERVER_CONSOLE Last Update Date/Time: 09/18/2001 13:20:53 === Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University University Computing Center e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: 804-828-4807
Management class and TDP for Oracle with RMAN
hi Vicente,
Please try to shorten the mgmt class name like Phillip has suggested. If
still doesn't work,
1. please turn on the API tracing. Use api and api_detail flags and get
me the trace file.
2. please get the output of your copy group values of all the mgmt class
in your domain that your TDPO node is registered with? To obtain the copy
group values, from admin client command issue:
tsm: TSMSERV1> q copy * * f=d
3. are you using default TDPO config file name from the install
directory? Because, in your note you mention TDPO.CONF as your TDPO
config file. So I am not quite sure you are using the file name as
tdpo.opt or tdpo.conf.
regards,
Thiha
>I had a problem like this and it was because the management class name
was
>too long. I don't remember what version or *sm I ran into it with but I
>shortened all my management classes to 10 character. I found this on a
>class called performance which I shortened to performanc.
>Hope this helps
--
>Phillip Ford
>Senior Software Specialist
>Corporate Computer Center
>Schering-Plough Corp.
>(901) 320-4462
>(901) 320-4856 FAX
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Hello Thiha.
>>Thanks for your help.
>>I'm still stuck with this issue. I have followed your instructions but
it
>>doesn't work. Whenever I start a script to backup the archivelog files,
it
>>keeps going to the default mgmt class.
>>These are my configuration files:
>>TDPO.CONF
>> DSMI_ORC_CONFIG /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/dsm.opt
>> DSMI_LOG /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/dsierror.log
>> TDPO_NODE dsiaja02_ora
>> TDPO_PSWDPATH /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle
>>DSM.OPT
>> SErvernamedsiaja04
>>DSM.SYS
>> SErvername dsiaja04
>> nodename dsiaja02_ora
>>COMMmethod TCPip
>>TCPPort1500
>>TCPServeraddress dsiaja04a
>>passwordaccess prompt
>>inclexcl /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/inclexcl
>>INCLEXCL
>> include /adsmorc/.../*.arc rman_archive_log
>>The script that I use is:
>> run{
>> allocate channel 'tsm0' type 'sbt_tape';
>> sql "alter system archive log current" ;
>> backup archivelog all format '%d_arch_%U' delete input;
>> }
>>Is there anything wrong?
>>Thank you for your cooperation !!
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>You can use 'include' option to bind with different management class.
It
>>>is documented on page 36 of the user manual. But you will have to do a
>>>little bit differently than what is documented.
>>>I assume that you are using different domain for your TDPO backups.
Let's
>>>say your default mgmt class's storage pool is pointing to disk pool. So
>>>you don't have to do anything for your database backups. As for the
>>>archive log file, let's say you have the pattern "log_archive_format =
>>>arch%t_%s.dbf" in your init.ora file. In your include definition file,
add
>>>include /adsmorc/.../arch* tapemgmt
>>>This will bind the archive logs to 'tapemgmt' class.
>>>If you don't use different domain for your TDPO backups and/or mgmt
class
>>>pointing to disk pool is not the default, you can add another line in
your
>>>include definition file:
>>>include /adsmorc/.../arch* tapemgmt
>>>include /adsmorc/.../* diskmgmt
>>>Make sure that these statements appear in the exact order.
I'm trying to configure RMAN and need some help. My scenario is AIX
4.3,
Oracle 8.1.6 and TDP for Oracle 2.2 64 bits.
My question is if it is possible to have differents management classes
when
making backups with RMAN. In the TDP manual there's only reference to
TDPO_MGMT_CLASS_2, 3 and 4 but only for the duplex copy option.
I'd like to have one management class for archive log files (sending
it
to
disk storage pools) and another for database files (sending it to tape
storage pools).
Re: Transaction Path
Quoting Matthew Large <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm not sure if anyone can help me, but I thought I'd try.. > I'm looking for a diagram which illustrates the path of a transaction > and it's records through the server. > > None of the manuals have quite what I'm looking for, so I was wondering > if my TSM colleagues around the world have ever needed to represent this > part of the server. Of course I wouldn't dream of using your work, I'm > just looking for ideas which may help me explain this process. There have been SHARE sessions that touch on this sort of thing. I have a copy of the handout for session 5724/5725 at the February 2001 SHARE in Long Beach. It includes diagrams for data movement in some types of transactions. I also have the handouts for session 5726/5727. It does not have data movement diagrams, but discusses some closely related topics.
Re: TSM Client on W2K
Patricia, Yes, HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\BackupClient\Nodes\x x WHERE xx= NODE NAME Bruce E. Lowrie Sr. Systems Analyst Information Technology Services Storage, Output, Legacy *E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Voice: ?(517) 496-6404 *Post:Mail: CO2111, (DC2 1st Floor) -Original Message- From: Patricia LeBlanc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM Client on W2K For a TSM Client on W2K..when you have "passwordaccess generate" the password is stored in the registry on the client. Does anyone know where exactly in the registry this is stored?? Thanks pattyleblanc Liberty Mutual Backup & Recovery Engineering Services _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
Re: TSM OS/390 DB "volumes"
It's so easy to move using TSM processes, why would you want to use some other utility. The good thing about using TSM to do the move is you don't even have to take the TSM server down. All you have to do is allocate and format the new volume, then add it as a mirror and delete the old volume. Jim Sporer At 11:54 AM 9/18/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Is there anything internal for a OS/390 TSM DataBase "volume" (i.e. the >VSAM LINEAR d/s), that prevents me from moving it using a standard system >utility ? > >Could I move the linear d/s, using FDR or DSS or are there internal >location-type pointers that would destroy the DB if pyhsically moved using >non-TSM processes ? > >=== >Zoltan Forray >Virginia Commonwealth University >University Computing Center >e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >voice: 804-828-4807
Re: error validating inserts ???
It's a known bug. Was discussed couple weeks ago on the list. There is no fix currently, there is an APAR out, Tivoli is working on a fix. The bug is harmless, has to do with license counting, I think, or something like that, no data at risk. Ignore it until the fix comes out. -Original Message- From: Tom Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: error validating inserts ??? Hi when im backupping/restoring Oracle databases I m seeing this output in the actlog: ANR0406I Session 9857 started for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(42551)). ANRD smnode.c(5323): Error validating inserts for event 14995. ANR0406I Session 9858 started for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(42552)). ANR0403I Session 9857 ended for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX). ANR0403I Session 9858 ended for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX). ANR0406I Session 9859 started for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(42556)). ANRD smnode.c(5323): Error validating inserts for event 14995. ANR0403I Session 9859 ended for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX). TSM server 413, Oracle DPA 2.2, API 413 Has anybody seen this, and knows the cure for it ? Thanks, Tom Smith _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Re: Tape problem
When I execute either command I get volume D00190 is not defined in a storage pool -Original Message- From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tape problem Importance: Low query content audit volume do dsmadmc >help audit >help query content -Original Message- From: Bruce Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape problem I have this tape in my library & checked into TSM v4.1.3.2 but I can not scratch it & as you can see I don't know what is on it. Is there any way to find out & correct it? LIBRARY_NAME: 3494LIB VOLUME_NAME: D00190 STATUS: Private OWNER: LAST_USE: HOME_ELEMENT: CLEANINGS_LEFT: Thanks, -- Bruce Kamp Network Analyst II Memorial Healthcare System P: (954)987-2020 x6008 F: (954)985-2274 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generate backupset seems hang
It's waiting for mount poinds: "Waiting for multiple mount points in device class FMSIICLASS" -Original Message- From: Guan, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: generate backupset seems hang Hello, I ran the command: >generate backupset node0 backupset0918 devclass=dwclass retention=90 desc='A test backupset' to create a backupset for node0. But it seems hang there for more than one hour, there are some other processes running right now. Any idea why it hang there? TSM server: 4.1.2.0 Library: 3494 w/4 tape drivers. Here is the output from screen: Dtsm: NODE_15_ADSM>q pr Process Process Description Status Number - 115 MigrationDisk Storage Pool FMSIICACHEPOOL, Moved Files: 1156, Moved Bytes: 106,396,712,960, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 1,073,881,088 Current output volume: CO0243. 150 Move DataVolume DR0010 (storage pool DWPROD_DAILY), Target Pool DWPROD_DAILY, Moved Files: 35891, Moved Bytes: 54,723,132,331, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 524,360,552 Current input volume: DR0010. Current output volume: SC0648. 151 Space ReclamationVolume CO0270 (storage pool FMSII_DAILY), Moved Files: 0, Moved Bytes: 0, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 1,073,881,460 Waiting for multiple mount points in device class FMSIICLASS (4769 seconds). 152 GENERATE BACKUPSET8,485 objects written to backup set and 0 objects skipped. tsm: NODE_15_ADSM> Best regards, Phillip Guan
TSM OS/390 DB "volumes"
Is there anything internal for a OS/390 TSM DataBase "volume" (i.e. the VSAM LINEAR d/s), that prevents me from moving it using a standard system utility ? Could I move the linear d/s, using FDR or DSS or are there internal location-type pointers that would destroy the DB if pyhsically moved using non-TSM processes ? === Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University University Computing Center e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: 804-828-4807
Client 4.1.3 for Win95 much slower by incremental backups
Hi, our laptop users begin to call us after upgrading the TSM client from 3.1.0.8 to 4.1.3 (Win95). Our server is 4.1.4 (OS/390). Since the upgrade, incremental backups take 5 times longer (see below). Why ?? 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4952I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects inspected:7,746 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4954I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects backed up:8 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4958I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects updated: 0 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4960I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects rebound: 0 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4957I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects deleted: 0 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4959I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects failed: 1 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4961I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of bytes transferred:19.04 MB 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4963I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Data transfer time: 10.65 sec 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4966I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Network data transfer rate:1,830.80 KB/sec 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4967I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Aggregate data transfer rate:307.05 KB/sec 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4968I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Objects compressed by: 35% 08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4964I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Elapsed processing time:00:01:03 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4952I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects inspected:7,774 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4954I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects backed up: 41 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4958I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects updated: 2,953 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4960I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects rebound: 0 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4957I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects deleted: 0 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4970I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects expired: 22 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4959I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects failed: 1 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4961I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of bytes transferred:19.67 MB 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4963I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Data transfer time: 20.05 sec 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4966I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Network data transfer rate:1,004.96 KB/sec 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4967I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Aggregate data transfer rate: 58.60 KB/sec 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4968I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Objects compressed by: 31% 09/06/2001 17:42:20 ANE4964I (Session: 11142, Node: CHVEV0295) Elapsed processing time:00:05:43 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4952I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects inspected:7,769 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4954I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects backed up: 18 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4958I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects updated: 0 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4960I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects rebound: 0 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4957I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects deleted: 0 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4970I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects expired: 1 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4959I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of objects failed: 0 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4961I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number of bytes transferred:20.14 MB 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4963I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Data transfer time: 22.98 sec 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4966I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Network data transfer rate: 897.84 KB/sec 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4967I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Aggregate data transfer rate: 62.93 KB/sec 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4968I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Objects compressed by: 30% 09/07/2001 17:00:19 ANE4964I (Session: 14564, Node: CHVEV0295) Elapsed processing time:00:05:27 The aggregate data transfer rate went down a lot, thanks for any tips Reni Lambelet Nestec S.A. / Informatique du Centre 55, av. Nestli CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland) *+41'21'924'35'43 7+41'21'924'28'88 * K4-117 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our site: http://www.nestle.com This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
Re: empty tape question
It takes long time.If ur db is big it may take very long time. U can see experiences in adsm.org. -Original Message- From: Guan, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: empty tape question Hi all, Just an additional info about our empty tape request problem. Our empty tape ( not scratch tape ) problem is caused because we don't have enough space to keep all the tapes inside the 3494 library so we have to checkout some lastest used tapes outside library and we have to checkin some scratch tapes everyday for night backup/archive use. Some one suggested to run a audit library, any idea how long it will take? We have filled up the tapes in two frames of 3494 with two drivers each. Thanks for your help! Phillip -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: empty tape question > I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or > migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are > outside. > How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount > outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library. > Thanks for your help! Phillip - How they got outside is the key: if you did something like a Move Media, they would get a state of MOUNTABLENotinlib, so would be eligible for mounting. Perform queries to check the state of your inside and outside volumes and adjust as needed. Richard Sims, BU
TSM Client on W2K
For a TSM Client on W2K..when you have "passwordaccess generate" the password is stored in the registry on the client. Does anyone know where exactly in the registry this is stored?? Thanks pattyleblanc Liberty Mutual Backup & Recovery Engineering Services
Re: Tape problem
You can do this: select * from volhistory where volume_name='D00190' to find out how the tape was used last. Another thing to try: q actlog begindate=today-10 search=D00190 to see what has happened to that tape in the last 10 days. What sometimes happens: If TSM has trouble mounting a scratch tape (due to problems with the robot or problems with the drive or problems with the tape itself) it will automatically mark the tape as PRIVATE so it doesn't go after the tape again on the next scratch request. If the actually problem was caused by the robot or the drive, once that problem is resolved, you just change the status back to scratch since there never was anything really wrong with the tape. If there is no valid data on the tape, and you don't think there is anything wrong with it, you can change it back to scratch with: update libv 3494LIB D00190 status=scratch -Original Message- From: Bruce Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape problem I have this tape in my library & checked into TSM v4.1.3.2 but I can not scratch it & as you can see I don't know what is on it. Is there any way to find out & correct it? LIBRARY_NAME: 3494LIB VOLUME_NAME: D00190 STATUS: Private OWNER: LAST_USE: HOME_ELEMENT: CLEANINGS_LEFT: Thanks, -- Bruce Kamp Network Analyst II Memorial Healthcare System P: (954)987-2020 x6008 F: (954)985-2274 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TSM Client on W2K
Key: HKLM\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\BackupClient\Nodes\ Data name: Password In the key, is the name of the node. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Tivoli Systems Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. Patricia LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/18/2001 08:20 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:TSM Client on W2K For a TSM Client on W2K..when you have "passwordaccess generate" the password is stored in the registry on the client. Does anyone know where exactly in the registry this is stored?? Thanks pattyleblanc Liberty Mutual Backup & Recovery Engineering Services
Tape problem
I have this tape in my library & checked into TSM v4.1.3.2 but I can not scratch it & as you can see I don't know what is on it. Is there any way to find out & correct it? LIBRARY_NAME: 3494LIB VOLUME_NAME: D00190 STATUS: Private OWNER: LAST_USE: HOME_ELEMENT: CLEANINGS_LEFT: Thanks, -- Bruce Kamp Network Analyst II Memorial Healthcare System P: (954)987-2020 x6008 F: (954)985-2274 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tape problem
query content audit volume do dsmadmc >help audit >help query content -Original Message- From: Bruce Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape problem I have this tape in my library & checked into TSM v4.1.3.2 but I can not scratch it & as you can see I don't know what is on it. Is there any way to find out & correct it? LIBRARY_NAME: 3494LIB VOLUME_NAME: D00190 STATUS: Private OWNER: LAST_USE: HOME_ELEMENT: CLEANINGS_LEFT: Thanks, -- Bruce Kamp Network Analyst II Memorial Healthcare System P: (954)987-2020 x6008 F: (954)985-2274 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generate backupset seems hang
Cancel 152 . I would stop and re start server at night.This way any problems are cleaned. -Original Message- From: Guan, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: generate backupset seems hang Hello, I ran the command: >generate backupset node0 backupset0918 devclass=dwclass retention=90 desc='A test backupset' to create a backupset for node0. But it seems hang there for more than one hour, there are some other processes running right now. Any idea why it hang there? TSM server: 4.1.2.0 Library: 3494 w/4 tape drivers. Here is the output from screen: Dtsm: NODE_15_ADSM>q pr Process Process Description Status Number - 115 MigrationDisk Storage Pool FMSIICACHEPOOL, Moved Files: 1156, Moved Bytes: 106,396,712,960, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 1,073,881,088 Current output volume: CO0243. 150 Move DataVolume DR0010 (storage pool DWPROD_DAILY), Target Pool DWPROD_DAILY, Moved Files: 35891, Moved Bytes: 54,723,132,331, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 524,360,552 Current input volume: DR0010. Current output volume: SC0648. 151 Space ReclamationVolume CO0270 (storage pool FMSII_DAILY), Moved Files: 0, Moved Bytes: 0, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 1,073,881,460 Waiting for multiple mount points in device class FMSIICLASS (4769 seconds). 152 GENERATE BACKUPSET8,485 objects written to backup set and 0 objects skipped. tsm: NODE_15_ADSM> Best regards, Phillip Guan
Re: Defrag Database
And actually no guarantee that your DB will be any smaller when you're done! -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Defrag Database Hi Maurice! An online defrag utility is on all our wish lists for some time! The only way to defrag your database is a offline dump and reload... Note that this is quite a lengthy process! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Maurice van 't Loo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 09:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Defrag Database Hi, *** ---> Q DB F=D Available Space (MB): 3.320 Assigned Capacity (MB): 3.320 Maximum Extension (MB): 0 Maximum Reduction (MB): 20 Pct Util: 43,2 Max. Pct Util: 52,0 Physical Volumes: 13 Because the database is around 50% utililized, i want to reduce the database, the by the spacetrigger made volumes can be deleted. Is there a way to "defrag" the database? Tia, Maurice ** This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
generate backupset seems hang
Hello, I ran the command: >generate backupset node0 backupset0918 devclass=dwclass retention=90 desc='A test backupset' to create a backupset for node0. But it seems hang there for more than one hour, there are some other processes running right now. Any idea why it hang there? TSM server: 4.1.2.0 Library: 3494 w/4 tape drivers. Here is the output from screen: Dtsm: NODE_15_ADSM>q pr Process Process Description Status Number - 115 MigrationDisk Storage Pool FMSIICACHEPOOL, Moved Files: 1156, Moved Bytes: 106,396,712,960, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 1,073,881,088 Current output volume: CO0243. 150 Move DataVolume DR0010 (storage pool DWPROD_DAILY), Target Pool DWPROD_DAILY, Moved Files: 35891, Moved Bytes: 54,723,132,331, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 524,360,552 Current input volume: DR0010. Current output volume: SC0648. 151 Space ReclamationVolume CO0270 (storage pool FMSII_DAILY), Moved Files: 0, Moved Bytes: 0, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 1,073,881,460 Waiting for multiple mount points in device class FMSIICLASS (4769 seconds). 152 GENERATE BACKUPSET8,485 objects written to backup set and 0 objects skipped. tsm: NODE_15_ADSM> Best regards, Phillip Guan
error validating inserts ???
Hi when im backupping/restoring Oracle databases I m seeing this output in the actlog: ANR0406I Session 9857 started for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(42551)). ANRD smnode.c(5323): Error validating inserts for event 14995. ANR0406I Session 9858 started for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(42552)). ANR0403I Session 9857 ended for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX). ANR0403I Session 9858 ended for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX). ANR0406I Session 9859 started for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(42556)). ANRD smnode.c(5323): Error validating inserts for event 14995. ANR0403I Session 9859 ended for node TRIDW1_ORACLE (TDP Oracle AIX). TSM server 413, Oracle DPA 2.2, API 413 Has anybody seen this, and knows the cure for it ? Thanks, Tom Smith _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
HSM Solution for NetWare
We are looking for an HSM solution for NetWare. I have TSM 3.7.4 on OS390 (we are in the process of upgrading to TSM 4.1.4) and TSM 4.1.3 client code on Novell 4.11 and 5.1 servers. Has anyone found an HSM solution that works well with TSM?
HELP -Client version issue!
Does anyone know if you can update a clients version information on the TSM server? Example - The TSM server says that a node is version 4.2.0.0 when in reality the node is at 3.7. Now when the client tries to contact the server for anything (schedule, backup, restore) it fails with the error that says the client is downlevel. Is there anyway to fix this other than updating the client code on the client itself? Dwight Wood AEP Columbus, OH _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Re: empty tape question
What is your reusedelay parameter set to? TSM will not reuse an expired tape until after the reusedalay period. -Original Message- From: Guan, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: empty tape question Hi, I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are outside. How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library. Thanks for your help! Best regards, Phillip Guan
Re: HELP -Client version issue!
>Does anyone know if you can update a clients version information on the TSM >server? Example - The TSM server says that a node is version 4.2.0.0 when in >reality the node is at 3.7. Now when the client tries to contact the server >for anything (schedule, backup, restore) it fails with the error that says >the client is downlevel. Is there anyway to fix this other than updating the >client code on the client itself? Dwight - Beware that this is a non-trivial issue... If the client had been at a given level (e.g., 4.2) and was then downgraded (say, to 3.7), the data stored at the 4.2 level will still be in the server in the specific format that is peculiar to that level of software. Attempting to restore it from a lower-level client is problematic at best. If that client's situation now is "messy", you may want to consider doing a Rename Node to start over with that client, if that's realistic. That should certainly reset the client level in the server. You can restore from the former name using a client of the appropriate level, on that machine or elsewhere. Richard Sims, BU
Re: empty tape question
Hi Ramnarayan, We use 'checkout libv' command to check tapes out. Phillip -Original Message- From: Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: empty tape question Hi Are you using the checkout command or the move media command to remove carts out of the library. Thks Sean -Original Message- From: Guan, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: empty tape question Hi all, Just an additional info about our empty tape request problem. Our empty tape ( not scratch tape ) problem is caused because we don't have enough space to keep all the tapes inside the 3494 library so we have to checkout some lastest used tapes outside library and we have to checkin some scratch tapes everyday for night backup/archive use. Some one suggested to run a audit library, any idea how long it will take? We have filled up the tapes in two frames of 3494 with two drivers each. Thanks for your help! Phillip -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: empty tape question > I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or > migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are > outside. > How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount > outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library. > Thanks for your help! Phillip - How they got outside is the key: if you did something like a Move Media, they would get a state of MOUNTABLENotinlib, so would be eligible for mounting. Perform queries to check the state of your inside and outside volumes and adjust as needed. Richard Sims, BU
Antwort: Re: Domino TDP and transaction logs
Hi Maklári, Thank you for the quick answer. But the Domino guys need a little more info. What will be fixed within this release ? Are you using an english Domino ? I`ve downloaded an TDP 1.1.1 . I suppose that will be ok also... . -- Holger Bitterlich Stadtsparkasse Köln Organisation und Datenverarbeitung Telefon: (0221) 226 - 54 18 Fax: (0221) 226 - 51 00 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sk-koeln.de "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 18.09.2001 10:48:40: > Hi Holger! > > Please upgrade your Domino server version to v5.07 or higher version and > TDP Domino to v1.1.0.1. > > Maklári Sándor > > User Tanácsadó Kft > 1025 Budapest, Szépvölgyi út 86/B. > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tel: 06-1-438-5425 > Fax: 06-1-438-5410 > Mobil: 06-20-9344-252 > > > > Holger Bitterlich > -KOELN.DE> cc: > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Domino TDP and > transaction logs > Stor Manager" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > 09/18/01 10:41 AM > Please respond to > "ADSM: Dist Stor > Manager" > __ Da E-Mails leicht unter fremdem Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden koennen, muessen wir zu Ihrem und unserem Schutz die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit der vorstehenden Erklaerungen ausschliessen. Die fuer die Stadtsparkasse Koeln geltenden Regeln ueber die Verbindlichkeit von rechtsgeschaeftlichen Erklaerungen mit verpflichtendem Inhalt bleiben unberuehrt.
Re: empty tape question
Hi Are you using the checkout command or the move media command to remove carts out of the library. Thks Sean -Original Message- From: Guan, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: empty tape question Hi all, Just an additional info about our empty tape request problem. Our empty tape ( not scratch tape ) problem is caused because we don't have enough space to keep all the tapes inside the 3494 library so we have to checkout some lastest used tapes outside library and we have to checkin some scratch tapes everyday for night backup/archive use. Some one suggested to run a audit library, any idea how long it will take? We have filled up the tapes in two frames of 3494 with two drivers each. Thanks for your help! Phillip -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: empty tape question > I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or > migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are > outside. > How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount > outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library. > Thanks for your help! Phillip - How they got outside is the key: if you did something like a Move Media, they would get a state of MOUNTABLENotinlib, so would be eligible for mounting. Perform queries to check the state of your inside and outside volumes and adjust as needed. Richard Sims, BU
Re: Domino TDP and transaction logs
> But we must see that this backup only catches translog files older than > appoximately 1,5 days. So do we have a large gap ??? (If so, very bad. So > bad, that I can`t belive.) I can`t see within TSM any possibility to get > ALL files. As far as I understand the backup strategy, the TDP can only > backup the files that the domino server is providing him, a kind of giving > the files free to backup. I read that the domino Server is allocating some > transaction log in advance.We can see that the server is not backing up > roundabout 135 transaction logs. Are these not backuped db`s the > preallocated files ??? Such a huge amount? > Do I have a problem, or is this the the regular behaviour? Holger, In addition to Maklári Sándor's suggestions... Please keep in mind that there are a few Lotus Domino SPRs (APARS) that deal with some archived log extents not being released. SPR #CLOL4P4E7M - Fixed a problem where after log extents were processed by backup software they were not reused or deleted by Domino. Fixed in Domino Server 5.07 (available now) SPR #SCON4W3UZD - Fixed a problem where using the backup APIs, only 70 archive log extents could be processed at one time. Fixed in Domino Server 5.09 (est. date: Nov.) SPR #JCHN4YPJJ7 - Fixed a problem where the last extent that was restored from the backup product was not being removed when the restore was completed which occurred when doing a restore with transactional logging active. Fixed in Domino Server 5.09 (est. date: Nov.) Again, these are Lotus SPRs (APARS) that are fixed when the specific Lotus Domino server is updated. Thanks, Del Del Hoobler IBM Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's a beautiful day. Don't let it get away." -- Bono
Re: empty tape question
Hi all, Just an additional info about our empty tape request problem. Our empty tape ( not scratch tape ) problem is caused because we don't have enough space to keep all the tapes inside the 3494 library so we have to checkout some lastest used tapes outside library and we have to checkin some scratch tapes everyday for night backup/archive use. Some one suggested to run a audit library, any idea how long it will take? We have filled up the tapes in two frames of 3494 with two drivers each. Thanks for your help! Phillip -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: empty tape question > I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or > migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are > outside. > How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount > outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library. > Thanks for your help! Phillip - How they got outside is the key: if you did something like a Move Media, they would get a state of MOUNTABLENotinlib, so would be eligible for mounting. Perform queries to check the state of your inside and outside volumes and adjust as needed. Richard Sims, BU
Re: empty tape question
> I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or > migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are > outside. > How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount > outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library. > Thanks for your help! Phillip - How they got outside is the key: if you did something like a Move Media, they would get a state of MOUNTABLENotinlib, so would be eligible for mounting. Perform queries to check the state of your inside and outside volumes and adjust as needed. Richard Sims, BU
Re: empty tape question
Hi On ADSM you got the option within the storage pools to specify whether you want to use any scratch volumes or you can specify which scratch volumes to use. I think your problem is within your storage pools where you are specifying which scratch volumes to use and not randomly choose any scratch volume that's available within the library. Make sure about this before doing a library inventory because if you checkout a volume from ADSM its database is aware of the volumes being checked out. Thks Sean ADSM Administrator EDS South Africa -Original Message- From: Guan, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: empty tape question Hi, I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are outside. How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library. Thanks for your help! Best regards, Phillip Guan
Re: empty tape question
If you do an audit library, TSM knows that the tapes are not longer in the lib anymore. If you change the empty tapes offen, you can schedule jl. an audit and after that a checkin with search=yes and stat=scratch Greetings, Maurice - Original Message - From: "Guan, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:31 AM Subject: empty tape question > Hi, > > I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or > migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are outside. > How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount > outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library. > Thanks for your help! > > Best regards, > Phillip Guan >
Transaction Path
Hi All, I'm not sure if anyone can help me, but I thought I'd try.. I'm looking for a diagram which illustrates the path of a transaction and it's records through the server. None of the manuals have quite what I'm looking for, so I was wondering if my TSM colleagues around the world have ever needed to represent this part of the server. Of course I wouldn't dream of using your work, I'm just looking for ideas which may help me explain this process. Do I ask too much? You tell me.. Many Thanks, Matthew Large http://www.phoenixitgroup.com **Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*** Phoenix IT Group Limited is registered in England and Wales under company number 3476115. Registered Office: Technology House, Hunsbury Hill Avenue, Northampton, NN4 8QS Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of our firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. No contracts may be concluded on behalf of our firm by means of email communications. Confidentiality: Confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the recipient indicated (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not take any action based on it, nor should you copy or show this to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight the error to the sender, then delete the message from your system. Monitoring of Messages: Please note that we reserve the right to monitor and intercept emails sent and received on our network. Warning: Internet email is not 100% secure. We ask you to understand and observe this lack of security when emailing us. We do not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
Domino TDP and transaction logs
hello *sm community, we have an Installation of LotusDomino 5.6a and TDP 1.1.0.0 running on NT 4 SP6 boxes. There are 4320 domino db`s with roundabout 60 gigs of data.The domino guys activated transaction logging in archive mode. We make an all-4-hours-backup of these logfiles on a regular basis. For doing this we use these 2 commands: domdsmc arch domdsmc inactivate But we must see that this backup only catches translog files older than appoximately 1,5 days. So do we have a large gap ??? (If so, very bad. So bad, that I can`t belive.) I can`t see within TSM any possibility to get ALL files. As far as I understand the backup strategy, the TDP can only backup the files that the domino server is providing him, a kind of giving the files free to backup. I read that the domino Server is allocating some transaction log in advance.We can see that the server is not backing up roundabout 135 transaction logs. Are these not backuped db`s the preallocated files ??? Such a huge amount? Do I have a problem, or is this the the regular behaviour? Thx a lot !!! -- Holger Bitterlich Stadtsparkasse Köln Organisation und Datenverarbeitung Telefon: (0221) 226 - 54 18 Fax: (0221) 226 - 51 00 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sk-koeln.de __ Da E-Mails leicht unter fremdem Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden koennen, muessen wir zu Ihrem und unserem Schutz die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit der vorstehenden Erklaerungen ausschliessen. Die fuer die Stadtsparkasse Koeln geltenden Regeln ueber die Verbindlichkeit von rechtsgeschaeftlichen Erklaerungen mit verpflichtendem Inhalt bleiben unberuehrt.
Re: Domino TDP and transaction logs
Hi Holger! Please upgrade your Domino server version to v5.07 or higher version and TDP Domino to v1.1.0.1. Maklári Sándor User Tanácsadó Kft 1025 Budapest, Szépvölgyi út 86/B. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 06-1-438-5425 Fax: 06-1-438-5410 Mobil: 06-20-9344-252 Holger Bitterlich cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Domino TDP and transaction logs Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 09/18/01 10:41 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" hello *sm community, we have an Installation of LotusDomino 5.6a and TDP 1.1.0.0 running on NT 4 SP6 boxes. There are 4320 domino db`s with roundabout 60 gigs of data.The domino guys activated transaction logging in archive mode. We make an all-4-hours-backup of these logfiles on a regular basis. For doing this we use these 2 commands: domdsmc arch domdsmc inactivate But we must see that this backup only catches translog files older than appoximately 1,5 days. So do we have a large gap ??? (If so, very bad. So bad, that I can`t belive.) I can`t see within TSM any possibility to get ALL files. As far as I understand the backup strategy, the TDP can only backup the files that the domino server is providing him, a kind of giving the files free to backup. I read that the domino Server is allocating some transaction log in advance.We can see that the server is not backing up roundabout 135 transaction logs. Are these not backuped db`s the preallocated files ??? Such a huge amount? Do I have a problem, or is this the the regular behaviour? Thx a lot !!! -- Holger Bitterlich Stadtsparkasse Köln Organisation und Datenverarbeitung Telefon: (0221) 226 - 54 18 Fax: (0221) 226 - 51 00 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sk-koeln.de __ Da E-Mails leicht unter fremdem Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden koennen, muessen wir zu Ihrem und unserem Schutz die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit der vorstehenden Erklaerungen ausschliessen. Die fuer die Stadtsparkasse Koeln geltenden Regeln ueber die Verbindlichkeit von rechtsgeschaeftlichen Erklaerungen mit verpflichtendem Inhalt bleiben unberuehrt.
