Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

2002-03-03 Thread Þórður Aðalsteinsson

Hi,

This is a clean install so migration has newer been possible and yes i have
two drives available online

-Original Message-
From: TAZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 2. mars 2002 23:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hello,

Was migration possible prior to upgrading?

Its not clear from you description if you actually have 2 available drives.

Check your drives and make certain you are not retaining a cleaning tape in
one drive.


Sam
- Original Message -
From: ^srpur Apalsteinsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hi y4all

I am installing TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, I have a Dell PowerVault 128T
library.

My problem is that when migrating from disk to tape I get this right away,
ANR0984I Process 28 for MIGRATION started in the BACKGROUND at 23:20:49.
ANR1000I Migration process 28 started for storage pool DISKPOOL. ANR1134W
Migration terminated for storage pool DISKPOOL - insufficient number of
mount points available for removable media. ANR0985I Process 28 for
MIGRATION running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE
at 23:20:49. ANR1002I Migration for storage pool DISKPOOL will be retried in
60 seconds. ANR1003I Migration retry delay ended; checking migration status
for storage pool DISKPOOL.

However im able to label and checkin volumes without any problems

I have changed the mount limit from drives to 2 (update dev ltoclass1
libr=lb0.0.0.2 devtype=lto mountlimit=2). That changed nothing

My feeling is that im overlooking somthing in the config of the library or
drives

I also have a newer version of firmware then the one tested with TSM.

Would changing OS4s do anything, go to W2K?

Best regards





^srpur Apalsteinsson

MCSE, MCP+I

Margmiplun Internet, Fyrirtfkja~jsnusta

Supurlandsbraut 4

105, Reykjavmk

Smmi 575 7000

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.mi.is



Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

2002-03-03 Thread Jack Musselman

Check your node setting, is the mountlimit set to two?

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Þórður Aðalsteinsson
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 4:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

Hi,

This is a clean install so migration has newer been possible and yes i have
two drives available online

-Original Message-
From: TAZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 2. mars 2002 23:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hello,

Was migration possible prior to upgrading?

Its not clear from you description if you actually have 2 available drives.

Check your drives and make certain you are not retaining a cleaning tape in
one drive.


Sam
- Original Message -
From: ^srpur Apalsteinsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hi y4all

I am installing TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, I have a Dell PowerVault 128T
library.

My problem is that when migrating from disk to tape I get this right away,
ANR0984I Process 28 for MIGRATION started in the BACKGROUND at 23:20:49.
ANR1000I Migration process 28 started for storage pool DISKPOOL. ANR1134W
Migration terminated for storage pool DISKPOOL - insufficient number of
mount points available for removable media. ANR0985I Process 28 for
MIGRATION running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE
at 23:20:49. ANR1002I Migration for storage pool DISKPOOL will be retried in
60 seconds. ANR1003I Migration retry delay ended; checking migration status
for storage pool DISKPOOL.

However im able to label and checkin volumes without any problems

I have changed the mount limit from drives to 2 (update dev ltoclass1
libr=lb0.0.0.2 devtype=lto mountlimit=2). That changed nothing

My feeling is that im overlooking somthing in the config of the library or
drives

I also have a newer version of firmware then the one tested with TSM.

Would changing OS4s do anything, go to W2K?

Best regards





^srpur Apalsteinsson

MCSE, MCP+I

Margmiplun Internet, Fyrirtfkja~jsnusta

Supurlandsbraut 4

105, Reykjavmk

Smmi 575 7000

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.mi.is



Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

2002-03-03 Thread Þórður Aðalsteinsson

Hi and thanx

Are you refering to the client node, if so then i have updated the
mountlimit to two and still the same result.


-Original Message-
From: Jack Musselman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 3. mars 2002 17:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Check your node setting, is the mountlimit set to two?

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Þórður Aðalsteinsson
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 4:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

Hi,

This is a clean install so migration has newer been possible and yes i have
two drives available online

-Original Message-
From: TAZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 2. mars 2002 23:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hello,

Was migration possible prior to upgrading?

Its not clear from you description if you actually have 2 available drives.

Check your drives and make certain you are not retaining a cleaning tape in
one drive.


Sam
- Original Message -
From: ^srpur Apalsteinsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hi y4all

I am installing TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, I have a Dell PowerVault 128T
library.

My problem is that when migrating from disk to tape I get this right away,
ANR0984I Process 28 for MIGRATION started in the BACKGROUND at 23:20:49.
ANR1000I Migration process 28 started for storage pool DISKPOOL. ANR1134W
Migration terminated for storage pool DISKPOOL - insufficient number of
mount points available for removable media. ANR0985I Process 28 for
MIGRATION running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE
at 23:20:49. ANR1002I Migration for storage pool DISKPOOL will be retried in
60 seconds. ANR1003I Migration retry delay ended; checking migration status
for storage pool DISKPOOL.

However im able to label and checkin volumes without any problems

I have changed the mount limit from drives to 2 (update dev ltoclass1
libr=lb0.0.0.2 devtype=lto mountlimit=2). That changed nothing

My feeling is that im overlooking somthing in the config of the library or
drives

I also have a newer version of firmware then the one tested with TSM.

Would changing OS4s do anything, go to W2K?

Best regards





^srpur Apalsteinsson

MCSE, MCP+I

Margmiplun Internet, Fyrirtfkja~jsnusta

Supurlandsbraut 4

105, Reykjavmk

Smmi 575 7000

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.mi.is



Re: More than one storage pool backing up to a single copypool.

2002-03-03 Thread ARhoads

Jon,

The reason I don't recommend this is that your offsites are your disaster
recovery media which will then have even more clients competing for tapes in
a disaster recovery mode.

Steffan
- Original Message -
From: Martin, Jon R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:55 AM
Subject: More than one storage pool backing up to a single copypool.


 All,

 Is it possible to have two storage pool's backup to the same copy
 storage pool?  I don't see anything in the manuals saying yes or no.

 We currently have a 'TAPEPOOL' which is backed up to a 'COPYPOOL'
.
 Then the 'COPYPOOL' tapes are sent offsite.  The original intention of our
 TSM installation was for backup of 'server' data only.  The 'TAPEPOOL'
uses
 collocation.

 Recently a growing number of executives have asked to have their
 desktops installed as TSM clients.  My problem is that right now each of
 these desktops will hog an entire volume because of the collocation.

 What I would like to do is create a 'TAPEPOOL_PC' which has
 collocation turned off and does a backup to the existing 'COPYPOOL'.


 Thank You,
 Jon Martin



Re: L700 Library

2002-03-03 Thread ARhoads

Kelli,

the devices.scsi message is quite old and is not typically a problem (as
there is no such device to install).  You should review your device specific
and AIX generic upper level drivers to ensure that they are all at the
latest levels.

However, the problem may be so simple as someone forgot to include the
library scsi cable in one of the SCSI busses.  A tape drive and the library
could even have a SCSI id conflict that would also cause one (or both) of
the devices to stop functioning.

Steffan
- Original Message -
From: Kelli Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:17 AM
Subject: L700 Library


We are trying, as earlier email indicated, to run an STK L700 library with
TSM 4.1.50 running on AIX 4.3.3.   The library originally shipped with
Seagate Viper 200 drives. We had the library configured via smitty/TSM
Devices and it was listed as available but the Seagate drives were not
because in preparation for IBM drives, we had installed Atape.  However, we
had requested IBM Ultrium drives so the drives were replaced with the IBM's
and now, the drives are available to the system, but the library is not.
The error message received after running cfgmgr inidcates that the package
'devices.scsi' is not installed.  Anybody ever see this?   Any help would be
appreciated...





Thanks so much!

Kelli Jones
Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 804-748-1951
fax: 804-748-1571



Re: How to use string operators in select statement - TSM.

2002-03-03 Thread Williams, Tim P {PBSG}

The server numbers should be unique (for the most part).
you can also try
select * from actlog where msgno=2565

-Original Message-
From: Allen Barth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to use string operators in select statement - TSM.


I think this is what you want:

Select * from actlog where left(message,10)='ANR2565I'

Regards,
Al




mobeenm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/28/02 03:21 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: How to use string operators in select statement
- TSM.


Sree Kumar,
Its absolutely possiblem to do that. Try the following

select * from actlog where message like 'ANR2565I%'

I think this should do the trick. Hope the climate in Bangalore is good
:-)

Regards
Mobeen

Mobeen Mahamood C.M
Systems Manager Lead
Micron Semiconductor Asia
Singapore





 -Original Message-
 From: Pothula S Paparao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:15 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: How to use string operators in select statement - TSM.


 Hi TSM'ers
 The below is the message from select output (select * from actlog)
 All I want to know is whether or not possible to caputue only
 the message
 no (ex. ANR2565I) using select query. I tried using string
 operations in
 select command. didnt help much. If any select expert tried
 this pls let me
 know. Im very much intrested to know about it.

 Thanks in advance.


 DATE_TIME: 2001-12-30 00:00:02.00
 MSGNO: 2565
  SEVERITY: I
   MESSAGE: ANR2565I 0 schedules for immediate client actions have been
 deleted.


 Regards

 Sreekumar.
 SO
 IBM Singapore.
 Phone : 65-8402634







*** PLEASE NOTE ***
This message, along with any attachments, may be confidential or legally
privileged.  It is intended only for the named person(s), who is/are the
only authorized recipients. If this message has reached you in error,
kindly destroy it without review and notify the sender immediately. Thank
you for your help.
**



Re: Select Stmts. in TSM

2002-03-03 Thread ARhoads

Holly,

I use the DB2 SQL docs from the IBM software site.  Between the TSM online
help (that shows you available verbs/syntax)  the DB2 docs I can generally
figure out whatever I need.  Please remember that TSM is not the best SQL
engine  should not be overused during otherwise busy periods.

Steffan
- Original Message -
From: Peppers, Holly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:42 AM
Subject: Select Stmts. in TSM


 Has anybody tried to do a join in the TSM tables?  I went looking thru the
 help utility and the manuals, but did not see the syntax of how to do
this.
 Let me know please.  Thanks.

 Holly L. Peppers
 Blue Cross  Blue Shield of Florida
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and
 affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this
e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the
views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.



Adsmtape and TSM 4.1

2002-03-03 Thread David Smith

I've noted the existance of the adsmtape program and I really need a version
that will work for TSM 41 on AIX  Here's a mail I posted on sourceforge in
the adsmtape discussion:

Hi,

I've inherited a problem where some monthly archive data was tagged for 5
week retention rather than 7 years Fortunately, this only affects 20% of
the montly archive Each archive resides on one DLT4 tape so my offsite
tapes still contain the data even though the TSM database has expired the
entries for it I know the tapes, I know the files, there are no spanned
files and the important files are too big to be aggregated Tivoli wants
$US85k+ to give me a salvage solution Is there any chance of a version of
adsmtape that will allow me to get my data back?

If anyone out there can give some advice it would be very much appreciated

Regards,

David Smith
AIX Administrator
Corporate Express Australia
67-77 Epsom Rd Sydney NSW
PH 02 93350318 or 0412 258 208



Invisible Archives

2002-03-03 Thread Subash, Chandra

Hi guys

I have a strange problem with automated Archives. I am on TSM server 3.7.4
moving to 4.2.19 shorly. Whenever I kick of an archive it says completed
sucess but when i check it throught the browser e.g http://host_name:1581 it
is not there . Please advise . This happens on AIX , NT and novell.


Regards
Chandra Subash
Unix/ Oracle Database Administrator
Teletech International
154 Pacific Highway, St Leonards
NSW 2065
Tel 02 -99301569
Sydney, Australia
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



HP server with Oracle 8.1.7 and Oracle 7.3.4

2002-03-03 Thread Ring, Gavin M

Hello All

I have a HP server running both Oracle 8.1.7 and Oracle 7.3.4 databases.

I've installed TDP for Oracle 2.2.0 to backup the Oracle 8.1.7 databases,
but how do I cater for the Oracle 7.3.4 databases?

Is it possible to install TDP for Oracle 2.1.0 on the same system ?

The TDP or Oracle 2.1.0 documentation indicates it will install over the top
of the TDP for Oracle 2.2.0 software.

Is it possible to install TDP for Oracle 2.1.0 in a location other than the
default?

Regards

Gavin Ring
EDS Australia
Enterprise Storage



Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

2002-03-03 Thread Jack Musselman

Have you queried your drives to make sure that you have two drives that are
online?

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Þórður Aðalsteinsson
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

Hi and thanx

Are you refering to the client node, if so then i have updated the
mountlimit to two and still the same result.


-Original Message-
From: Jack Musselman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 3. mars 2002 17:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Check your node setting, is the mountlimit set to two?

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Þórður Aðalsteinsson
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 4:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

Hi,

This is a clean install so migration has newer been possible and yes i have
two drives available online

-Original Message-
From: TAZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 2. mars 2002 23:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hello,

Was migration possible prior to upgrading?

Its not clear from you description if you actually have 2 available drives.

Check your drives and make certain you are not retaining a cleaning tape in
one drive.


Sam
- Original Message -
From: ^srpur Apalsteinsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hi y4all

I am installing TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, I have a Dell PowerVault 128T
library.

My problem is that when migrating from disk to tape I get this right away,
ANR0984I Process 28 for MIGRATION started in the BACKGROUND at 23:20:49.
ANR1000I Migration process 28 started for storage pool DISKPOOL. ANR1134W
Migration terminated for storage pool DISKPOOL - insufficient number of
mount points available for removable media. ANR0985I Process 28 for
MIGRATION running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE
at 23:20:49. ANR1002I Migration for storage pool DISKPOOL will be retried in
60 seconds. ANR1003I Migration retry delay ended; checking migration status
for storage pool DISKPOOL.

However im able to label and checkin volumes without any problems

I have changed the mount limit from drives to 2 (update dev ltoclass1
libr=lb0.0.0.2 devtype=lto mountlimit=2). That changed nothing

My feeling is that im overlooking somthing in the config of the library or
drives

I also have a newer version of firmware then the one tested with TSM.

Would changing OS4s do anything, go to W2K?

Best regards





^srpur Apalsteinsson

MCSE, MCP+I

Margmiplun Internet, Fyrirtfkja~jsnusta

Supurlandsbraut 4

105, Reykjavmk

Smmi 575 7000

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.mi.is



Re: ADSM/TSM and INFORMIX online Backups

2002-03-03 Thread Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS]

Hi George

We are currently using the X/OPEN api to backup the Informix database.
We are also using the onbar utility in conjunction with the X/OPEN api.
My question is how to set up management classes for the backups and also
the
logs and how to expire these backups and logs.

Thks 
Sean

-Original Message-
From: George Lesho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 9:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ADSM/TSM and INFORMIX online Backups


Need more info Sean. In order for Onbar to play with TSM, a shared
library
is needed. Tivoli previously gave you one in ADSM Ver 3.1 but dropped
the
shared library for later distributions when it found it could sell a
stand
alone product (thus put some more coins in their pocket) called TDM for
Informix which is basically a shared XBSA library. Informix does have
one
available that they got gratis from Legatto some time ago but it doesn't
work well. The only other 3rd party product that provides a shared
library
is BMC SQL BackTrack for Informix which also allows you to pull database
tables from the TSM backup tapes and stick them in a warm database (nice
feature). My location uses SQL BackTrack for Informix. How do you plan
on
putting a shared library into use? The BMC product has you create
backup
pools which basically are the conduit to TSM by allowing you to bind a
management class to a backup (the backup pools have nothing to do with
actual tapes. I don't run onbar commands to do backups but use BMC
commands
which in turn call the onbar commands. I do all backups as TSM archive
type
because expiration doesn't work well with backup type backups. There
isn't a true incremental capability withing TSM against these data bases
anyway. There is an incremental capability within onbar (L0, L1, L2) but
TSM doesn't care about this aspect of Onbar. Read the Onbar Backup and
Restore Guide for your version of Informix and decide how you are going
to
come up with an XBSA shared library.
Don't hesitate to shoot further questions.

George Lesho
AFC Enterprises






Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on
03/01/2002 02:42:11 AM

Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject:  ADSM/TSM and INFORMIX online Backups

Hi

I would like to know if any has setup INFORMIX to backup to ADSM/TSM ?
My question is how did you set up the management class for the Informix
logical and physical
logs to be backed up to ADSM using the onbar function.
How does ADSM store the logs in the server ?
How to delete the logs when inactive from ADSM/TSM.

Thks

Sean Ramnarayan

MMS caltex.com made the following
 annotations on 03/01/2002 10:42:11 AM

--

DISCLAIMER
This message may contain confidential information that is legally
privileged and is intended only  for the use of the parties to whom it
is
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any information in
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message
in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.
Thank
you.


==


MMS caltex.com made the following
 annotations on 03/04/2002 09:01:20 AM
--
DISCLAIMER
This message may contain confidential information that is legally privileged and is 
intended only  for the use of the parties to whom it is addressed. If you are not an 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution 
or use of any information in this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. 
Thank you.

==



Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

2002-03-03 Thread ARhoads

Þórður,

If you have only two tape drives then you probably want your storage pool to
only reference one else you would use both of your tape drives for
migration...

Can you get a successful TSM database backup or any other operation to use a
tape drive?

Steffan
- Original Message -
From: Þórður Aðalsteinsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hi and thanx

Are you refering to the client node, if so then i have updated the
mountlimit to two and still the same result.


-Original Message-
From: Jack Musselman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 3. mars 2002 17:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Check your node setting, is the mountlimit set to two?

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Þórður Aðalsteinsson
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 4:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points

Hi,

This is a clean install so migration has newer been possible and yes i have
two drives available online

-Original Message-
From: TAZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 2. mars 2002 23:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hello,

Was migration possible prior to upgrading?

Its not clear from you description if you actually have 2 available drives.

Check your drives and make certain you are not retaining a cleaning tape in
one drive.


Sam
- Original Message -
From: ^srpur Apalsteinsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, insufficient number of mount points


Hi y4all

I am installing TSM 4.2.1.9 on Win NT, I have a Dell PowerVault 128T
library.

My problem is that when migrating from disk to tape I get this right away,
ANR0984I Process 28 for MIGRATION started in the BACKGROUND at 23:20:49.
ANR1000I Migration process 28 started for storage pool DISKPOOL. ANR1134W
Migration terminated for storage pool DISKPOOL - insufficient number of
mount points available for removable media. ANR0985I Process 28 for
MIGRATION running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE
at 23:20:49. ANR1002I Migration for storage pool DISKPOOL will be retried in
60 seconds. ANR1003I Migration retry delay ended; checking migration status
for storage pool DISKPOOL.

However im able to label and checkin volumes without any problems

I have changed the mount limit from drives to 2 (update dev ltoclass1
libr=lb0.0.0.2 devtype=lto mountlimit=2). That changed nothing

My feeling is that im overlooking somthing in the config of the library or
drives

I also have a newer version of firmware then the one tested with TSM.

Would changing OS4s do anything, go to W2K?

Best regards





^srpur Apalsteinsson

MCSE, MCP+I

Margmiplun Internet, Fyrirtfkja~jsnusta

Supurlandsbraut 4

105, Reykjavmk

Smmi 575 7000

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.mi.is