FIXED: Fresh install of TDP for Domino crashed on Win2K
All, Turns out the problem was that I was accessing the W2K server using a terminal services client. I switched to a remote control of the console and everything went OK. Strange huh? Why would going thru a TS client affect it? Anyway, all's well that ends well. Mark -- Mark Ferraretto Unix Systems Administrator Deutsche Bank Hong Kong w: +852 2203 6362m: +852 9558 8032f: +852 2203 6971 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Forwarded by Mark Ferraretto/HK/DBAsia/DeuBa on 06/20/03 02:55 PM - Mark Ferraretto To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/03 12:04 PMcc: Subject: Fresh install of TDP for Domino crashed on Win2K(Document link: Mark Ferraretto) All, I've installed the latest TDP for Domino client on one of our W2K Notes boxes. I can't run the GUI at all. It crashes on startup. I can however run domdsmc but domdsmc also crashes. But it only seems to crash when attempting to access the Domino server. I've managed to register the client to the TSM server and I can change the tsm password and I can set settings (eg: ini path). But if I do anything involving the domino server eg: domdsmc q domino, it crashes. A dump of the crash and the .rip file follow. Any ideas? Thanks Mark C:\PROGRA~1\TSM\dominodomdsmc q domino Tivoli Storage Manager Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1, Level 2.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2001. All rights reserved. License file exists and contains valid license data. Unexpected internal error returned to logger: 0x20762010 Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\statrep.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\public\it\R5PSPG.NSF Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\NAV\navlog.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\NAV\navdefs.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\NAV\nav.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\names.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\mail1\hk209781.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\log.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\iw\iwmail.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\dbecna.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\busytime.nsf Unable to complete restart processing, err = Recovery Manager: Error from Loggin g Subsystem.. Thread=[0544:0002-015C] PANIC: Unable to complete restart processing. * Quincy for Win32 Rev 2.00 * * Copyright 1995-7, Lotus Development Corp. * * All rights reserved * * Abnormal Termination Report * Portions Copyright (C) 1985-1993 Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved. Quincy has detected the following fatal exception Please report this crash to the vendor of the faulting application: App: C:\Program Files\TSM\domino\domdsmc.exe (PID=0x4A0) When: 6/20/2003 @ 10:46:21.683 Exception Number: 0x8003 (hardcoded breakpoint) Exception Flags: 0x (continuable) Notes Build: Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002 Hotfixes: none... State Dump for Thread ID 0xE88 EAX: 01C90860 EBX: 13E3 ECX: EDX: 01D23533 ESI: 0166FC48 EDI: EIP: 77F97704 ESP: 001226C4 EBP: 00122A30 IOPL: 0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc CS: 001B SS: 0023 DS: 0023 ES: 0023 FS: 0038 GS: EFL: 0202 -- Code Disassembly -- function: nosymbols+ 77f976f8 75fc jnz 77f976f6 77f976fa e836ff call77f97635 77f976ff e90bfc jmp 77f9730f FAULT -77f97704 cc int 3 77f97705 c3 ret 77f97706 32c0 xor al,al 77f97708 e929f4feff jmp 77f86b36 77f9770d 55 pushebp 77f9770e 8bec mov ebp,esp 77f97710 81ec8000 sub esp,0x80 PANIC: Unable to complete restart processing. -- Top of the Stack -- 001226C4 0115367A 0001
Re: Schedule for the last day of the month...every month
Curtis, if I may ask: how can you monitor backup status (ie success or failure of all your nodes) if you use autosys? - Mr. Lindsay Morris Lead Architect www.servergraph.com 512-482-6138 ext 105 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Curtis Stewart Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Schedule for the last day of the month...every month We've just decided to get rid of the whole TSM scheduler for the most part and go with an external schedular for TSM backups (AutoSys). It fixes the whole last day of the month, or quarter or whatever problem easily. It also lets us quit using the TSM scheduler on our clients. This may not be the right answer for you, but it looks like it's going to work fine for us. curtis stewart Kent Monthei wrote: You might be able to develop schedule a little script which a) does a 'delete schedule' b) goes through a loop that performs a 'define schedule' for the 31st/30th/29th/28th (in that order) c) after each 'define schedule' attempt, checks the Return Code (or output of 'q sched') d) exit if/when the 'define schedule' is successful. Then schedule the script to run on any of the 1st through 28th day of the month. Kent Monthei GlaxoSmithKline Bill Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19-Jun-2003 13:14 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L cc: Subject:Schedule for the last day of the month...every month I have a client that wants to do monthly backups on the last day of the month. A co-worker did some testing and creating a schedule for say 5/31/3002 with PERU=MONTH. The June event gets scheduled for 6/30, but then remains the 30th day from then on. Until Feb next year when it moves to the 29th. Outside of creating a schedule for each month with a PERU=YEAR, is there a way to do a schedule on the last day of every month?? TIA, Bill Boyer Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield. - ??
Re: Another academic survey; second try
From: Fred Johanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The response to this last Friday was less than overwhelming. So I'll ask again. Richard, Gretchen, Dave, Zoltan, Roger, ERic, Bob, Steve, Scotty, Sheelagh, Remco, et al., I look forward to some ind of response. Pretty pushy, don't you think? *And*, this is the wrong forum to ask such things. If you really wanted a response, you should email your (politely worded) requests directly. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Berbee Information Networks Office 262.521.5627
Re: Restore
The MC 'MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA' have a backup copy group assigned to it, but it MC is defined to yhe virtualnodename (PATROL02). This MC does not exits to GW01. GW01 is the machine from I executed dsmc -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02. Then , is necessary that both nodes (Gw01 y patrol02) to use the same MC? Janeth -Mensaje original- De: Curtis Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Jueves, 19 de Junio de 2003 11:07 p.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: Restore Check your option file or client option set for a dirmc parameter. I bet it's in one of those spots and it points at management class that doesn't have a backup copy group assigned to it. curtis stewart Lopez Janeth wrote: ok, but now the problem is the Management Class, I obtain the following mesagges: $ dsmc -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02 Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2001, All Rights Reserved. tsm restore /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin Node Name: EQ201PATROL02 Please enter password for node EQ201PATROL02: Session established with server ADSM: MVS Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50 Server date/time: 06/19/03 13:54:12 Last access: 06/19/03 13:09:47 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the error log. Session established with server ADSM: MVS Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50 Server date/time: 06/19/03 13:54:15 Last access: 06/19/03 13:54:12 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the error log. Restore function invoked. Session established with server ADSM: MVS Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50 Server date/time: 06/19/03 13:54:16 Last access: 06/19/03 13:54:15 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the error log. dsmerror.log: 06/19/03 13:57:52 Management Class 'MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA' used for Directory objects doesn't doesn't have a backup copy group. Specify another using the DirMC option. 06/19/03 13:57:52 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the erro r log. the MC 'MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA' exist in Patrol02, but it do not exist in GW01 What you recommend us? Janeth -Mensaje original- De: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Martes, 17 de Junio de 2003 10:40 p.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: Restore From: Lopez Janeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to do a restore backup version of files to a different workstation. I use : restore -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02 /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 I obtain the following messages in the dsmerror.log: ANS1108E Invalid option (-VIRTUALNODENAME) for the RESTORE command Try this, rather: # dsmc -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02 tsm restore /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 whatever_target_directory_you_desire Note: the above command will restore one file (called consola_1606) from the directory /home/u/NetCmmnd. If you want to restore the directory console_1606 (and all subdirectories under it), the command should read tsm restore /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606/* whatever_target_directory_you_desire -subdir=yes -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Berbee Information Networks Office 262.521.5627
Re: Restore
OK, someone correct me if I'm wrong. But, if you're doing a restore with a virtualnodename, and the DIRMC is not in a client option file, but in a dsm.opt file, then the restore session won't know about the DIRMC, right? The MC 'MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA' have a backup copy group assigned to it, but it MC is defined to yhe virtualnodename (PATROL02). This MC does not exits to GW01. GW01 is the machine from I executed dsmc -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02. Then , is necessary that both nodes (Gw01 y patrol02) to use the same MC? Janeth -Mensaje original- De: Curtis Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Jueves, 19 de Junio de 2003 11:07 p.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: Restore Check your option file or client option set for a dirmc parameter. I bet it's in one of those spots and it points at management class that doesn't have a backup copy group assigned to it. curtis stewart Lopez Janeth wrote: ok, but now the problem is the Management Class, I obtain the following mesagges: $ dsmc -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02 Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2001, All Rights Reserved. tsm restore /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin Node Name: EQ201PATROL02 Please enter password for node EQ201PATROL02: Session established with server ADSM: MVS Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50 Server date/time: 06/19/03 13:54:12 Last access: 06/19/03 13:09:47 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the error log. Session established with server ADSM: MVS Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50 Server date/time: 06/19/03 13:54:15 Last access: 06/19/03 13:54:12 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the error log. Restore function invoked. Session established with server ADSM: MVS Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50 Server date/time: 06/19/03 13:54:16 Last access: 06/19/03 13:54:15 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the error log. dsmerror.log: 06/19/03 13:57:52 Management Class 'MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA' used for Directory objects doesn't doesn't have a backup copy group. Specify another using the DirMC option. 06/19/03 13:57:52 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the erro r log. the MC 'MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA' exist in Patrol02, but it do not exist in GW01 What you recommend us? Janeth -Mensaje original- De: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Martes, 17 de Junio de 2003 10:40 p.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: Restore From: Lopez Janeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to do a restore backup version of files to a different workstation. I use : restore -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02 /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 I obtain the following messages in the dsmerror.log: ANS1108E Invalid option (-VIRTUALNODENAME) for the RESTORE command Try this, rather: # dsmc -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02 tsm restore /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 whatever_target_directory_you_desire Note: the above command will restore one file (called consola_1606) from the directory /home/u/NetCmmnd. If you want to restore the directory console_1606 (and all subdirectories under it), the command should read tsm restore /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606/* whatever_target_directory_you_desire -subdir=yes -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Berbee Information Networks Office 262.521.5627
Expiration - is this a bug or by design?
TSM Server 5.1.6.5 on AIX 4.3 TSM Client 5.1.6.0 on HPUX 11i Hi, we are doing image backup of raw devices every day directly to tapes. The copygroup settings, to which are bound these backups are: Policy Domain Name: HPUX-MTEL Policy Set Name: HPUX-MTEL Mgmt Class Name: LEAPT Copy Group Name: STANDARD Copy Group Type: Backup Versions Data Exists: 5 Versions Data Deleted: 1 Retain Extra Versions: 15 Retain Only Version: 30 Copy Mode: Absolute Copy Serialization: Shared Static Copy Frequency: 0 Copy Destination: LEAPT-LTO ast Update by (administrator): MILIEVA Last Update Date/Time: 06/04/2003 10:56:51 Every backup goes in parallel to 2 tapes, which we make readonly after that by some reasons, so normally when expiration occurs the oldest 2 tapes goes to scratch. But one backup didn't completed successfully, so only half of the raw devices were backuped. As I knew that there were no changes on the client, I deleted the volumes with the broken backup and started a new one. After that day, we have a 2 tapes, that have some data expired on them: T5LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 290,071.6 73.8 Filling T6LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 288,035.2 100.0 Filling T00010LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 288,051.2 29.2 Filling T00019LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 290,087.6 100.0 Filling T00027LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 290,087.6 100.0 Filling T00030LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 287,219.1 100.0 Filling T00035LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 290,903.7 100.0 Filling T00079LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 288,035.2 100.0 Filling T00092LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 288,151.4 100.0 Filling T00093LEAPT-LTOL700-LTO1 289,971.4 100.0 Filling A select on contents table for that node shows me that there are 4 versions for the raw devices belonging to the broken backup, and 5 for the others. But there are 4 successfull backups for that node since then. I expected on the next backup to have 5 versions for all raw devices, but it continues keeping different versions of different data bound to one management class! And I'm sure that all data from that node go exactly to that management class. What do you think - is this a normal behaviour?? Maria Ilieva
Unavailable LTO Tapes
Hello All, I have recently taken over the TSM admin duties in a small AIX 4.3.3 environment and have little experience with Tivoli and how to manage our 3584 library. Yesterday I had one of our four tape drives go offline, and errpt indicates a disk drive error. Now I have a tape that has gone unavailable twice and shows 0% utilized. My question (finally) is what is the best procedure for getting any data off of the tape and removing it from the library and the database so that Tivoli knows that it is damaged and is being removed. Also since I will be replacing this tape with a new one, can I just remove the barcode label and put it on the new one? Any help is greatly appreciated. Shawn
dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX
Hi, a short update on this problem: the process dsmc sched is looping, using 50% of 2 proc's, meaning it uses 100% of 1 processor ! (seen with topas) The loop consists of a serie of LOCK / UNLOCK / LOCK /UNLOCK etc... Any tips ? our TSM server: AIX: 4.3 / TSM: 5.1.5.4 the TSM client: AIX: 5.1 / TSM: 5.1.5.15 and also 4.2.1 Regards, René LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central Support Center Information Technology Av. Nestlé 55 CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland) tél +41 (0)21 924 35 43 fax +41 (0)21 703 30 17 local K4-404 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive Question
Hi, On trying to run an archive on a win2000 using the backup/archive client I get the following message on clicking the archive button (before file selection). ANS5148W The server needs to do a one-time conversion of your archive data before you can continue. This operation may take a long time, and cannot be cancelled once it has started. Are you willing to wait for the conversion to complete? The server version is:- Tivoli Storage Manager Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.0 Does this mean that this will kick of a conversion for all of the archive data on the tsm server or just for this node. What do the group recommend? Regards Will Sarsfield Midrange Database Administrator Infrastructure Services IT Service Delivery Travelex Plc Tel.01733 502070 Mobile 07808 633037 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** IMPORTANT NOTICE This e-mail message (including its attachments) is private, is intended for the recipient named in it and may contain material which is confidential and privileged. No-one other than the named recipient may read, copy, rely on, redirect, save or alter the message or any part of it or any attachment to it in any way. The Travelex Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the Travelex Group unless otherwise specifically stated. While reasonable effort has been made to ensure this message is free of viruses, opening and using this message is at the risk of the recipient. Travelex can be found on the World Wide Web at http://www.travelex.com. **
Re: dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX
Please let me know ML level on AIX433 -Original Message- From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX Hi, a short update on this problem: the process dsmc sched is looping, using 50% of 2 proc's, meaning it uses 100% of 1 processor ! (seen with topas) The loop consists of a serie of LOCK / UNLOCK / LOCK /UNLOCK etc... Any tips ? our TSM server: AIX: 4.3 / TSM: 5.1.5.4 the TSM client: AIX: 5.1 / TSM: 5.1.5.15 and also 4.2.1 Regards, René LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central Support Center Information Technology Av. Nestlé 55 CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland) tél +41 (0)21 924 35 43 fax +41 (0)21 703 30 17 local K4-404 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX
Are the dsmerror.log or dsmsched.log stored outside temp, and not excluded? [RC] - Original Message - From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:18 AM Subject: Re: dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX Please let me know ML level on AIX433 -Original Message- From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX Hi, a short update on this problem: the process dsmc sched is looping, using 50% of 2 proc's, meaning it uses 100% of 1 processor ! (seen with topas) The loop consists of a serie of LOCK / UNLOCK / LOCK /UNLOCK etc... Any tips ? our TSM server: AIX: 4.3 / TSM: 5.1.5.4 the TSM client: AIX: 5.1 / TSM: 5.1.5.15 and also 4.2.1 Regards, Reni LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central Support Center Information Technology Av. Nestli 55 CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland) til +41 (0)21 924 35 43 fax +41 (0)21 703 30 17 local K4-404 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX
use the dsmcad, client acceptor daemon (managed services). It stops the scheduler until the backup time is actually scheduled to happen then shuts it off again. We had the same problem but instead of going through client system performance analysis we just implemented cad, and the potential performance issue went away. thanks!. --Justin Richard Bleistein Unix/TSM Systems Administrator (Sungard eSourcing) Desk: (856) 566 - 3485 Cell:(856) 912 - 0861 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Re: dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 06/20/2003 11:51 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Are the dsmerror.log or dsmsched.log stored outside temp, and not excluded? [RC] - Original Message - From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:18 AM Subject: Re: dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX Please let me know ML level on AIX433 -Original Message- From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dsmc scheduler looping, uses 100% cpu - AIX Hi, a short update on this problem: the process dsmc sched is looping, using 50% of 2 proc's, meaning it uses 100% of 1 processor ! (seen with topas) The loop consists of a serie of LOCK / UNLOCK / LOCK /UNLOCK etc... Any tips ? our TSM server: AIX: 4.3 / TSM: 5.1.5.4 the TSM client: AIX: 5.1 / TSM: 5.1.5.15 and also 4.2.1 Regards, Reni LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central Support Center Information Technology Av. Nestli 55 CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland) til +41 (0)21 924 35 43 fax +41 (0)21 703 30 17 local K4-404 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FIXED: Fresh install of TDP for Domino crashed on Win2K
Term services on Win2K does not run in Console0. So it is not really the desktop and is doesn't always give you full access to the registry and other things. Win 2003 Term services is supposed to use Console0 so in theory it should allow you to use TDP from term services. But don't hold me to that I haven't tried it. If you can see the Domino console then you should be able to use TDP. Greg Redell Great-West Life Annuity Insurance Co. Phone: 314-525-5877 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Ferraretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/2003 01:56 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:FIXED: Fresh install of TDP for Domino crashed on Win2K All, Turns out the problem was that I was accessing the W2K server using a terminal services client. I switched to a remote control of the console and everything went OK. Strange huh? Why would going thru a TS client affect it? Anyway, all's well that ends well. Mark -- Mark Ferraretto Unix Systems Administrator Deutsche Bank Hong Kong w: +852 2203 6362m: +852 9558 8032f: +852 2203 6971 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Forwarded by Mark Ferraretto/HK/DBAsia/DeuBa on 06/20/03 02:55 PM - Mark Ferraretto To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/03 12:04 PMcc: Subject: Fresh install of TDP for Domino crashed on Win2K(Document link: Mark Ferraretto) All, I've installed the latest TDP for Domino client on one of our W2K Notes boxes. I can't run the GUI at all. It crashes on startup. I can however run domdsmc but domdsmc also crashes. But it only seems to crash when attempting to access the Domino server. I've managed to register the client to the TSM server and I can change the tsm password and I can set settings (eg: ini path). But if I do anything involving the domino server eg: domdsmc q domino, it crashes. A dump of the crash and the .rip file follow. Any ideas? Thanks Mark C:\PROGRA~1\TSM\dominodomdsmc q domino Tivoli Storage Manager Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1, Level 2.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2001. All rights reserved. License file exists and contains valid license data. Unexpected internal error returned to logger: 0x20762010 Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\statrep.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\public\it\R5PSPG.NSF Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\NAV\navlog.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\NAV\navdefs.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\NAV\nav.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\names.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\mail1\hk209781.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\log.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\iw\iwmail.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\dbecna.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB d:\Lotus\Domino\Data\busytime.nsf Unable to complete restart processing, err = Recovery Manager: Error from Loggin g Subsystem.. Thread=[0544:0002-015C] PANIC: Unable to complete restart processing. * Quincy for Win32 Rev 2.00 * * Copyright 1995-7, Lotus Development Corp. * * All rights reserved * * Abnormal Termination Report * Portions Copyright (C) 1985-1993 Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved. Quincy has detected the following fatal exception Please report this crash to the vendor of the faulting application: App: C:\Program Files\TSM\domino\domdsmc.exe (PID=0x4A0) When: 6/20/2003 @ 10:46:21.683 Exception Number: 0x8003 (hardcoded breakpoint) Exception Flags: 0x (continuable) Notes Build: Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002 Hotfixes: none... State Dump for Thread ID 0xE88 EAX: 01C90860 EBX: 13E3 ECX: EDX: 01D23533 ESI: 0166FC48 EDI: EIP: 77F97704 ESP: 001226C4 EBP: 00122A30 IOPL: 0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc CS: 001B SS: 0023 DS: 0023 ES: 0023 FS: 0038 GS: EFL: 0202 -- Code Disassembly -- function: nosymbols+ 77f976f8 75fc jnz 77f976f6 77f976fa e836ff call77f97635 77f976ff e90bfc jmp 77f9730f FAULT -77f97704 cc int 3 77f97705 c3 ret 77f97706 32c0 xor al,al 77f97708 e929f4feff jmp 77f86b36 77f9770d 55 pushebp 77f9770e 8bec mov ebp,esp 77f97710
ANS1304W related to previous Disk Failure???
Below is a message from the ABC client software one of the Admins sent me from their system last night. I am guessing this is related to the disk that failed in the disk pool where this node dumps data, yes but I could be wrong. The other day a disk failed with 1.6% data left on it migrating to tape so some data was lost. Maybe someone more familiar with the ABC client can tell help clear this up? Question related to this failure. 1. If a client goes to restore a file that happened to be on that disk when it failed, which means it did not go to tape, what will the client see on their end? Will the GUI show the file as active/inactive or has TSM dumped it from the DB? 2. If the file happened to make it to the offsite tapes and the user happened to try and restore that file what kind of message would they get? Archive Backup Client for ADSM on OpenVMS, Version V3.1.0.4 Copyright 1996-2001, Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. %ABC-W-TXNNOTCMT, ADSM transaction cannot be committed -ABC-I-INFO, module: ABC_API_FILESPACE.C;1 Line: 5411 -ABC-I-APIOUT, ANS1304W (RC4)Active object not found %ABC-W-NOFSCLN, deleted file processing did not complete on DISK$SOFTWARE: -ABC-W-ADSMERR, ADSM subsystem failure Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
Re: ANS1304W related to previous Disk Failure???
Geoff, The ABC client software for OpenVMS was written by my company, SSSI. I'm assuming that you aren't too familiar with it because of your question regarding what will show up in the GUI. ABC is different than other clients in that it uses the TSM API to save and restore files - it helps to keep that in mind because some things happen in the client software instead of on the server. In this case, it does appear that the active file may have been on the disk that failed. What have you done with that disk - did you mark it destroyed and try to recover the files that may have gone to your copypool? Bill Smoldt STORServer, Inc. SSSI [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gill, Geoffrey L. Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ANS1304W related to previous Disk Failure??? Below is a message from the ABC client software one of the Admins sent me from their system last night. I am guessing this is related to the disk that failed in the disk pool where this node dumps data, yes but I could be wrong. The other day a disk failed with 1.6% data left on it migrating to tape so some data was lost. Maybe someone more familiar with the ABC client can tell help clear this up? Question related to this failure. 1. If a client goes to restore a file that happened to be on that disk when it failed, which means it did not go to tape, what will the client see on their end? Will the GUI show the file as active/inactive or has TSM dumped it from the DB? 2. If the file happened to make it to the offsite tapes and the user happened to try and restore that file what kind of message would they get? Archive Backup Client for ADSM on OpenVMS, Version V3.1.0.4 Copyright 1996-2001, Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. %ABC-W-TXNNOTCMT, ADSM transaction cannot be committed -ABC-I-INFO, module: ABC_API_FILESPACE.C;1 Line: 5411 -ABC-I-APIOUT, ANS1304W (RC4)Active object not found %ABC-W-NOFSCLN, deleted file processing did not complete on DISK$SOFTWARE: -ABC-W-ADSMERR, ADSM subsystem failure Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
Re: ANS1304W related to previous Disk Failure???
The ABC client software for OpenVMS was written by my company, SSSI. I'm assuming that you aren't too familiar with it because of your question regarding what will show up in the GUI. Actually the GUI question was just in general and only related to those clients that have it. I do know a little about the ABC client and know there is no GUI. The disk itself has been deleted from the TSM server. I have not tried to recover files from offsite pools because at this point I am not sure how I can figure out what was on that disk, what was not copied from the disk, or what went offsite, if anything. Tape recovery is all I have had to deal with, this is a first for me. Anyone else had this happen and can give some insight? Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154 -Original Message- From: Bill Smoldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ANS1304W related to previous Disk Failure??? Geoff, ABC is different than other clients in that it uses the TSM API to save and restore files - it helps to keep that in mind because some things happen in the client software instead of on the server. In this case, it does appear that the active file may have been on the disk that failed. What have you done with that disk - did you mark it destroyed and try to recover the files that may have gone to your copypool? Bill Smoldt STORServer, Inc. SSSI [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gill, Geoffrey L. Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ANS1304W related to previous Disk Failure??? Below is a message from the ABC client software one of the Admins sent me from their system last night. I am guessing this is related to the disk that failed in the disk pool where this node dumps data, yes but I could be wrong. The other day a disk failed with 1.6% data left on it migrating to tape so some data was lost. Maybe someone more familiar with the ABC client can tell help clear this up? Question related to this failure. 1. If a client goes to restore a file that happened to be on that disk when it failed, which means it did not go to tape, what will the client see on their end? Will the GUI show the file as active/inactive or has TSM dumped it from the DB? 2. If the file happened to make it to the offsite tapes and the user happened to try and restore that file what kind of message would they get? Archive Backup Client for ADSM on OpenVMS, Version V3.1.0.4 Copyright 1996-2001, Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. %ABC-W-TXNNOTCMT, ADSM transaction cannot be committed -ABC-I-INFO, module: ABC_API_FILESPACE.C;1 Line: 5411 -ABC-I-APIOUT, ANS1304W (RC4)Active object not found %ABC-W-NOFSCLN, deleted file processing did not complete on DISK$SOFTWARE: -ABC-W-ADSMERR, ADSM subsystem failure Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
Re: Schedule for the last day of the month...every month
Hi, Lindsay. I would suggest also monitoring backup status using a select statement to pull out filespaces that didn't complete backup within x amount of time, even if you use the TSM scheduler. This is useable with autosys. Also, autosys scripts can report based on RC, and since we now have meaningful RC's from the client, that probably provides autosys reasonable success/failure notification. My autosys controlled backups email me on failure, but I'm using scripts to parse the dsmc output for some weird things, rather than using the dsmc RC. The problem we run into is that our TSM admins don't have visibility into the Autosys schedules for load balancing purposes. I'm still trying to figure that one out. Maybe a weekly autosys report? Hmm... Alex Paschal Freightliner, LLC (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail -Original Message- From: Mr. Lindsay Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Schedule for the last day of the month...every month Curtis, if I may ask: how can you monitor backup status (ie success or failure of all your nodes) if you use autosys? - Mr. Lindsay Morris Lead Architect www.servergraph.com 512-482-6138 ext 105 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Curtis Stewart Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Schedule for the last day of the month...every month We've just decided to get rid of the whole TSM scheduler for the most part and go with an external schedular for TSM backups (AutoSys). It fixes the whole last day of the month, or quarter or whatever problem easily. It also lets us quit using the TSM scheduler on our clients. This may not be the right answer for you, but it looks like it's going to work fine for us. curtis stewart Kent Monthei wrote: You might be able to develop schedule a little script which a) does a 'delete schedule' b) goes through a loop that performs a 'define schedule' for the 31st/30th/29th/28th (in that order) c) after each 'define schedule' attempt, checks the Return Code (or output of 'q sched') d) exit if/when the 'define schedule' is successful. Then schedule the script to run on any of the 1st through 28th day of the month. Kent Monthei GlaxoSmithKline Bill Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19-Jun-2003 13:14 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L cc: Subject:Schedule for the last day of the month...every month I have a client that wants to do monthly backups on the last day of the month. A co-worker did some testing and creating a schedule for say 5/31/3002 with PERU=MONTH. The June event gets scheduled for 6/30, but then remains the 30th day from then on. Until Feb next year when it moves to the 29th. Outside of creating a schedule for each month with a PERU=YEAR, is there a way to do a schedule on the last day of every month?? TIA, Bill Boyer Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield. - ??
Re: TSM 5.2
I just put a call into our sales rep today. Anyone know how much it costs to upgrade from 5.1 to 5.2? Richard Sims wrote: Does anyone know when TSM 5.2 is scheduled for release? http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usaletsparms=H_203-095 Richard Sims, BU
Re: Archive Question
On trying to run an archive on a win2000 using the backup/archive client I get the following message on clicking the archive button (before file selection). ANS5148W The server needs to do a one-time conversion of your archive data before you can continue. This operation may take a long time, and cannot be cancelled once it has started. Are you willing to wait for the conversion to complete? The server version is:- Tivoli Storage Manager Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.0 Does this mean that this will kick of a conversion for all of the archive data on the tsm server or just for this node. What do the group recommend? Will - It seems like you have a very old client which has recently upgraded its client software and is now getting active again. TSM message descriptions are disappointingly vague and undefinitive in too many cases. The client session would apparently be inciting what the server administrator might do by planned schedule: a CONVert Archive command, which operates on a node's data. The http://www-1.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP100254 paper which Stanfield Alejandro recently mentioned gives a good perspective on the archives conundrum. Richard Sims, BU
Re: TSM 5.2
I understand there are problems running TSM 5.1 or POWER-4 machines running AIX 5.1. Is this also true for AIX 5.2 on POWER 4 running TSM 5.1 or will this be fixed in TSM 5.2? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/03 01:58PM I just put a call into our sales rep today. Anyone know how much it costs to upgrade from 5.1 to 5.2? Richard Sims wrote: Does anyone know when TSM 5.2 is scheduled for release? http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usaletsparms=H_203-095 Richard Sims, BU
Re: Archive Question
Will, I can't answer your question definitively because of the same reason Richard sighted, but I do agree with him that it operates only on the nodes data . In addition I have seen this same message recently when upgrading TSM clients from 5.1.1.0 to 5.1.5.15. Bottom line is that to complete the upgrade you have to do the conversion. The good news is that I never encountered it running longer than a couple minutes. Bryan Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/03 02:05PM On trying to run an archive on a win2000 using the backup/archive client I get the following message on clicking the archive button (before file selection). ANS5148W The server needs to do a one-time conversion of your archive data before you can continue. This operation may take a long time, and cannot be cancelled once it has started. Are you willing to wait for the conversion to complete? The server version is:- Tivoli Storage Manager Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.0 Does this mean that this will kick of a conversion for all of the archive data on the tsm server or just for this node. What do the group recommend? Will - It seems like you have a very old client which has recently upgraded its client software and is now getting active again. TSM message descriptions are disappointingly vague and undefinitive in too many cases. The client session would apparently be inciting what the server administrator might do by planned schedule: a CONVert Archive command, which operates on a node's data. The http://www-1.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP100254 paper which Stanfield Alejandro recently mentioned gives a good perspective on the archives conundrum. Richard Sims, BU
Re: TSM 5.2
I am have installed and ran TSM 5.1 on POWER4 machines running both AIX 5.1 and 5.2 w/out any real problems. -- Joshua S. Bassi Tivoli Certified Consultant -ADSM/TSM eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark Cell (831) 595-3962 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lawrence Clark Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 5.2 I understand there are problems running TSM 5.1 or POWER-4 machines running AIX 5.1. Is this also true for AIX 5.2 on POWER 4 running TSM 5.1 or will this be fixed in TSM 5.2? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/03 01:58PM I just put a call into our sales rep today. Anyone know how much it costs to upgrade from 5.1 to 5.2? Richard Sims wrote: Does anyone know when TSM 5.2 is scheduled for release? http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usaletsparms=H_203-095 Richard Sims, BU
Re: Schedule for the last day of the month...every month
Thanks, Alex - brilliant idea - and that's how Servergraph already does it. We give the TSM admins visibility into the status, checked daily, fo how old the backups are. So they need not care about schedules - just whether things are current or not. The really great side benefit from this is finding wasted space. That is, if a filespace ahs not backed up in 90 days, does it still exist? Probably not, except on TSM tapes. Delete it. We had one customer free up 4 TB of defunct filespaces. Anybody who's short on library space should check for that one way or another. (IMHO) - Mr. Lindsay Morris Lead Architect www.servergraph.com 512-482-6138 ext 105 -Original Message- From: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:25 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Schedule for the last day of the month...every month Hi, Lindsay. I would suggest also monitoring backup status using a select statement to pull out filespaces that didn't complete backup within x amount of time, even if you use the TSM scheduler. This is useable with autosys. Also, autosys scripts can report based on RC, and since we now have meaningful RC's from the client, that probably provides autosys reasonable success/failure notification. My autosys controlled backups email me on failure, but I'm using scripts to parse the dsmc output for some weird things, rather than using the dsmc RC. The problem we run into is that our TSM admins don't have visibility into the Autosys schedules for load balancing purposes. I'm still trying to figure that one out. Maybe a weekly autosys report? Hmm... Alex Paschal Freightliner, LLC (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail -Original Message- From: Mr. Lindsay Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Schedule for the last day of the month...every month Curtis, if I may ask: how can you monitor backup status (ie success or failure of all your nodes) if you use autosys? - Mr. Lindsay Morris Lead Architect www.servergraph.com 512-482-6138 ext 105 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Curtis Stewart Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Schedule for the last day of the month...every month We've just decided to get rid of the whole TSM scheduler for the most part and go with an external schedular for TSM backups (AutoSys). It fixes the whole last day of the month, or quarter or whatever problem easily. It also lets us quit using the TSM scheduler on our clients. This may not be the right answer for you, but it looks like it's going to work fine for us. curtis stewart Kent Monthei wrote: You might be able to develop schedule a little script which a) does a 'delete schedule' b) goes through a loop that performs a 'define schedule' for the 31st/30th/29th/28th (in that order) c) after each 'define schedule' attempt, checks the Return Code (or output of 'q sched') d) exit if/when the 'define schedule' is successful. Then schedule the script to run on any of the 1st through 28th day of the month. Kent Monthei GlaxoSmithKline Bill Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19-Jun-2003 13:14 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L cc: Subject:Schedule for the last day of the month...every month I have a client that wants to do monthly backups on the last day of the month. A co-worker did some testing and creating a schedule for say 5/31/3002 with PERU=MONTH. The June event gets scheduled for 6/30, but then remains the 30th day from then on. Until Feb next year when it moves to the 29th. Outside of creating a schedule for each month with a PERU=YEAR, is there a way to do a schedule on the last day of every month?? TIA, Bill Boyer Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield. - ??
v5.2!
WAHOO! The v5.2 media is here! Off to install it on our test server... Gretchen Thiele Princeton University
Re: v5.2!
Where is the TSM Version 5.2? I only see up to 5.1... David C. Pearson IS Production Support Analyst System Network Service Snohomish County PUD # 1 ole0.bmp Phone: 425.347.4420 Pager: 425.290.0944 FAX: 425.267.6380 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gretchen L. Thiele [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:v5.2! WAHOO! The v5.2 media is here! Off to install it on our test server... Gretchen Thiele Princeton University ole0.bmp
Re: v5.2!
Last document I saw said JUNE 27, as in NEXT FRIDAY ! Pearson, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/2003 03:14 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: v5.2! Where is the TSM Version 5.2? I only see up to 5.1... David C. Pearson IS Production Support Analyst System Network Service Snohomish County PUD # 1 ole0.bmp Phone: 425.347.4420 Pager: 425.290.0944 FAX: 425.267.6380 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gretchen L. Thiele [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:v5.2! WAHOO! The v5.2 media is here! Off to install it on our test server... Gretchen Thiele Princeton University ole0.bmp Description: Binary data
Restoring NT file security settings
We have a Win2k server that has 75+ shares based on the hospital department that uses it. The security on the folders is configured so that users can only access there own department's folder. And, depending on the user, they can only do certain things within each folder. The director of the department has full rights and each user down the line has less and less rights all the way down to the lowest person in the department who has almost no rights. Yes, it's complicated but that's the way they want it. One of our IS guys decided to add a superuser to the shares and somehow screwed up all the security settings on the folders. All the settings are wrong now and we can't figure out what he did to screw it up so bad. It would take far too long to restore all the files. I have been playing with the restore using the command line to try and do a directory only restore. I have restored the directory tree to another location to see if it is doing what I want it to do and it looks like it might work. The restored folders have all the right security settings. I'm using the restore d:\wrkgrp\*.* -dirsonly d:\temp\ command on the local server to bring back the directory structure. Is this a good approach to repair this mess? I'm running TSM 5.1.5 on the server. David Tyree Microcomputer Specialist South Georgia Medical Center 229.333.1155 Confidential Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: v5.2!
Pearson, Dave wrote: Where is the TSM Version 5.2? I only see up to 5.1... It isn't available on the web pages - this is a physical distribution on CDs. HOWEVER, checked the doc and it says that AIX 4.3.3 is supported, but when I go to install, everything fails because I'm missing two prerequisites: bos.rte 5.1.0.0 and bos.mp64 5.1.0.1, which are both AIX 5.1 filesets. Bummer. Going to poke around a bit further. Gretchen Thiele Princeton University
Restoring NT file security settings
It depends. Doing a directory only restore will bring back the directory NTFS security acl's but it will not bring back the directory share level security. NTFS object security information is stored with the object on the server and will be restored when the individual NTFS object is restored. Share level security (may be set on all types of file systems) is stored in the registry and currently is only backed up as part of the registry so the only way to get it back is to restore a previous copy of the registry. Backing up the individual directory share information with the directory is a well known requirement which development has contemplated implementing (draw your own conclusions on that statement), and this would accomplish what you trying to do regardless of whether NTFS acl's or Share security were used. Hope this answers your question Regards, Pete Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 06/20/2003 03:37 PM --- Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Restoring NT file security settings We have a Win2k server that has 75+ shares based on the hospital department that uses it. The security on the folders is configured so that users can only access there own department's folder. And, depending on the user, they can only do certain things within each folder. The director of the department has full rights and each user down the line has less and less rights all the way down to the lowest person in the department who has almost no rights. Yes, it's complicated but that's the way they want it. One of our IS guys decided to add a superuser to the shares and somehow screwed up all the security settings on the folders. All the settings are wrong now and we can't figure out what he did to screw it up so bad. It would take far too long to restore all the files. I have been playing with the restore using the command line to try and do a directory only restore. I have restored the directory tree to another location to see if it is doing what I want it to do and it looks like it might work. The restored folders have all the right security settings. I'm using the restore d:\wrkgrp\*.* -dirsonly d:\temp\ command on the local server to bring back the directory structure. Is this a good approach to repair this mess? I'm running TSM 5.1.5 on the server. David Tyree Microcomputer Specialist South Georgia Medical Center 229.333.1155 Confidential Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
[no subject]
Like many others on the list I inherited TSM after it was already set up. There are many Management classes defined that I am sure are not being used any longer. I would like to start cleaning these up if possible but I don't know how to find out if; 1. They are currently being used by a current node 2. If they are somehow tied to old nodes and/or files that have not expired Does anyone know of a script or select statement that would give me this information? I have played around a little bit with no luck. any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, Shannon Bach Madison Gas Electric Co. e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TSM 5.2
http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usaletsparms=H_203-095 June 27, 2003 (Electronic) and July 11, 2003 (Media): Tivoli Storage Manager, Tivoli Storage Manager Extended Edition, Tivoli Storage Manager for Storage Area Networks, Tivoli Storage Manager for Space Management, Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail, and Tivoli Storage Manager for Application Servers
7336-205 and TSM 5.1.6.5 on Aix 5.2 ML1
I'm having problems adding a 7336-205 Library to a 5.1.6.5 TSM server on AIX 5.2 ML1 on a RS6000 Model 150. When I try to add the library media changer I get an error like below ? ? 1800-106 An error occurred: ? ? ? ? lsattr: 0514-506 There is not enough memory available now. ? ? ? I'm at the latest ptf's for TSM and for the OS The machine is maxed out at 1gb of memory. It has lots of memory free. Any ideas? Scott Figgins IBM CATE / IBM Certified pSeries,xSeries,Storage 386.760.0994 office 386.871.3975 mobile 630.578.2378 e-fax aol aim /yahoo im id: fig4ibm - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
v5.2 update...
Well, even though the v5.2 Quick Start Guide says that AIX 4.3.3 is supported, it isn't. There's an error in the Quick Start Guide for AIX on the web page. Oh well, was worth a shot. Heading off to work on an AIX upgrade! Gretchen Thiele Princeton University
Re: Restore
gw01: dsm.sys dirmc MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA patrol02 dsm.sys dirmc MC_SRV_PATROL02_PRUEBA tsm q backup /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 Size Backup DateMgmt Class A/I File ----- --- 268,062 06/20/03 16:02:27MC_SRV_PAT A /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 I want to restore the file /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 of patrol02 in gw-01 -Mensaje original- De: Curtis Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Viernes, 20 de Junio de 2003 09:21 a.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: Restore OK, someone correct me if I'm wrong. But, if you're doing a restore with a virtualnodename, and the DIRMC is not in a client option file, but in a dsm.opt file, then the restore session won't know about the DIRMC, right? The MC 'MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA' have a backup copy group assigned to it, but it MC is defined to yhe virtualnodename (PATROL02). This MC does not exits to GW01. GW01 is the machine from I executed dsmc -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02. Then , is necessary that both nodes (Gw01 y patrol02) to use the same MC? Janeth -Mensaje original- De: Curtis Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Jueves, 19 de Junio de 2003 11:07 p.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: Restore Check your option file or client option set for a dirmc parameter. I bet it's in one of those spots and it points at management class that doesn't have a backup copy group assigned to it. curtis stewart Lopez Janeth wrote: ok, but now the problem is the Management Class, I obtain the following mesagges: $ dsmc -virtualnodename=eq201patrol02 Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2001, All Rights Reserved. tsm restore /home/u/NetCmmnd/consola_1606 /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin Node Name: EQ201PATROL02 Please enter password for node EQ201PATROL02: Session established with server ADSM: MVS Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50 Server date/time: 06/19/03 13:54:12 Last access: 06/19/03 13:09:47 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the error log. Session established with server ADSM: MVS Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50 Server date/time: 06/19/03 13:54:15 Last access: 06/19/03 13:54:12 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the error log. Restore function invoked. Session established with server ADSM: MVS Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50 Server date/time: 06/19/03 13:54:16 Last access: 06/19/03 13:54:15 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the error log. dsmerror.log: 06/19/03 13:57:52 Management Class 'MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA' used for Directory objects doesn't doesn't have a backup copy group. Specify another using the DirMC option. 06/19/03 13:57:52 ANS1128S Invalid Management Class assigned to directories. Please see the erro r log. the MC 'MC_SRV_GW01_SO_DIA' exist in Patrol02, but it do not exist in GW01 What you recommend us? Janeth
Re: Archive Question
Actually this is a normal message for any new node that goes to do an archive. If it is an old node, the time to run depends on the amount of archived data - this can take hours and consume lots of log space (if in rollforward mode). If it is a new node it runs in about 0 seconds! I've had various issues with the convert archive and have a PMR open which I've suggested that this convert should happen automatically for new nodes (or at least have an option). -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 20, 2003 1:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Archive Question On trying to run an archive on a win2000 using the backup/archive client I get the following message on clicking the archive button (before file selection). ANS5148W The server needs to do a one-time conversion of your archive data before you can continue. This operation may take a long time, and cannot be cancelled once it has started. Are you willing to wait for the conversion to complete? The server version is:- Tivoli Storage Manager Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.0 Does this mean that this will kick of a conversion for all of the archive data on the tsm server or just for this node. What do the group recommend? Will - It seems like you have a very old client which has recently upgraded its client software and is now getting active again. TSM message descriptions are disappointingly vague and undefinitive in too many cases. The client session would apparently be inciting what the server administrator might do by planned schedule: a CONVert Archive command, which operates on a node's data. The http://www-1.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP100254 paper which Stanfield Alejandro recently mentioned gives a good perspective on the archives conundrum. Richard Sims, BU
v5.2 interface
I just installed 5.2 on my Debian 3.0 box and the admin web interface is more clean with restyled images. Cool. And now it's waiting for the new client GUI. If anyone is interested in screenshots, let me know. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
