san backup on file device class?

2003-07-11 Thread TSM
Hello,

is it possible to transfer data over lanfree path  to a file device class
(virtual volumes on disk)?


with best regards


stefan savoric


Re: san backup on file device class?

2003-07-11 Thread Bugs
Hi Stefan,
The answer is Yes, but you must user following programs:
1. Tivoli Storage Manager for SAN
2. Sanergy






Best Regards,
Svetoslav Tolev

Phone:  +359(2)9753629
Mobile: +359(88)817629
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of TSM
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: san backup on file device class?

Hello,

is it possible to transfer data over lanfree path  to a file device class
(virtual volumes on disk)?


with best regards


stefan savoric


more than one backupset on one tape?

2003-07-11 Thread TSM
Hello,

how can we consolidate many backupsets to one tape?

we have to checkout these backupsets for disaster recovery weekly, because
the demand is to have the possibility
to recover every node without tsm db in worst case (we have over 200 nodes
and lto2 drives !!)

there is a server to server connection available, on both sides many drives

is this feature planned in future tsm versions?

Thanks for your help.

with best regards

stefan savoric


Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Jacques Butcher
Hi Everyone.

I've restore the system volume (c:) and all system objects
(of which I have a consistent backup of) successfully.  I
can access Active Directory and see all resources.  I can
even see all the resources from another machine through a
UNC path.  It even prompts me for a username and and
password.  I type the domain name\username and the password
and I can see all printers, etc.

I however cannot log onto or join the domain.

Did anyone else get this?

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

==
Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun.
http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile


Re: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Christian Svensson

   
   
   


When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified


 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com








   
  Jacques Butcher  
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .CO.ZA>  cc: 
  Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:  Active Directory Problems
  Dist Stor
  Manager"  
   
   
  2003-07-11 10:53 
  Please respond to
  "ADSM: Dist Stor 
  Manager" 
   
   




Hi Everyone.

I've restore the system volume (c:) and all system objects
(of which I have a consistent backup of) successfully.  I
can access Active Directory and see all resources.  I can
even see all the resources from another machine through a
UNC path.  It even prompts me for a username and and
password.  I type the domain name\username and the password
and I can see all printers, etc.

I however cannot log onto or join the domain.

Did anyone else get this?

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

==
Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun.
http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile


<><><>

Re: Does ITSM Windows Client run on Windows 2000 NAS Operating System?

2003-07-11 Thread Zlatko Krastev
Actually it will work - that is what IBM is doing on their NAS devices
(they come with TSM client built-in). But you have to be aware of the fact
that the vendors do not like some other software to be installed there.
You may end up with a configuration unsupported by HP!

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Doug Thorneycroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09.07.2003 23:33
Please respond to dthorneycroft


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Does ITSM Windows Client run on Windows 2000 NAS Operating 
System?


We are in the process of purchasing a HP StorageWorks NAS.
Does anyone know if the standard Windows Client will run on the
Windows2000 NAS OS?
>From the IBM support site, it looks like NDMP is only supported for
"Network
Appliance" at this time.


AW: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Stefan Holzwarth
As i understood bmr recovery for windows2000 you must install to the same
directory as before.
If you restore from a temp running windows the systemobjects go to the wrong
destination!

Regards Stefan Holzwarth

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christian Svensson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 11:05
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems



   
   
   


When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified



 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com









   
  Jacques Butcher  
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .CO.ZA>  cc: 
  Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:  Active Directory
Problems
  Dist Stor
  Manager"  
   
   
  2003-07-11 10:53 
  Please respond to
  "ADSM: Dist Stor 
  Manager" 
   
   




Hi Everyone.

I've restore the system volume (c:) and all system objects
(of which I have a consistent backup of) successfully.  I
can access Active Directory and see all resources.  I can
even see all the resources from another machine through a
UNC path.  It even prompts me for a username and and
password.  I type the domain name\username and the password
and I can see all printers, etc.

I however cannot log onto or join the domain.

Did anyone else get this?

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

==
Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun.
http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile


Re: AW: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Christian Svensson

   
   
   


Hi Stefan!
I have also read that.
But I have never get a Domain Controller to work if I work after the TSM
Documentation.
If you read the documentation from Veritas and Legato. They say. When the
server is a Domain Controller in Windows 2000 you should install a TEMP
installation of your Windows 2000 Server. And restore the system on there
normal path.
When the system is up and runing. You should remove your temp installation.
But if got a member server to a Windows 2000 Domain. Then should it work
normaly.

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified


 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com








   
  Stefan Holzwarth 
Subject:  AW: Active Directory Problems
  Sent by: "ADSM:  
  Dist Stor
  Manager"  
   
   
  2003-07-11 12:14 
  Please respond to
  "ADSM: Dist Stor 
  Manager" 
   
   




As i understood bmr recovery for windows2000 you must install to the same
directory as before.
If you restore from a temp running windows the systemobjects go to the
wrong
destination!

Regards Stefan Holzwarth

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christian Svensson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 11:05
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems








When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified




 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com











  Jacques Butcher
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .CO.ZA>  cc:
  Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:  Active Directory
Problems
  Dist Stor
  Manager" 


  2003-07-11 10:53
  Please respond to
  "ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager"






Hi Everyone.

I've restore the system volume (c:) and all system objects
(of which I have a consistent backup of) successfully.  I
can access Active Directory and see all resources.  I can
even see all the resources from another machine through a
UNC path.  It even prompts me for a username and and
password.  I type the domain name

Re: AW: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Jacques Butcher
I've performed the initial installation of Windows 2000 to
the original directory.  I.e. I'm restoring the original
Windows 2000 over my initial installation.

I'm trying to convince the customer to purchase CBMR.  He
however want't to see ITSM work natively before he decides
to purchase more hardware/software for it.  If I can prove
this works he will look at options to optimize his DR
strategy.

The specific error message I get on Win98 is "No domain
server could be found to validate your password" (may not
be specifically that but everyone knows the message).  On
Windows 2000 I get a DNS related error although DNS seems
to be working fine.

I will try the following;
1. Install W2K into a temp directory
2. Restores OS files (to original directory)
3. Reboot into AD restore mode
4. Restore system objects

One other thing I should mention is that I'm restoring a
W2K server (FSMO mater) that forms part of a 3 way
replication partnership.  Will this cause trouble?


On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:14:29 +0200
 Stefan Holzwarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As i understood bmr recovery for windows2000 you must
> install to the same
> directory as before.
> If you restore from a temp running windows the
> systemobjects go to the wrong
> destination!
>
> Regards Stefan Holzwarth
>
> -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Christian Svensson
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 11:05
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems
>
>
>
>

>
>

>
>

>
>
>
> When you installed Windows on the machine.
> Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then
> restore all data
> from TSM?
> Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and
> overwrite each file
> with TSM?
>
> If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got
> that problem. That
> is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
> Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the
> data from TSM to
> there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in
> Restore Directory
> Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the
> server again and
> remove the temp Windows installation.
>
> Now should it work fine.
> To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool.
> Talk to IBM and they
> should give you some advice. Or can you download your own
> eval. copy from
> www.cristie.com
>
> Best Regard / Med vdnlig hdlsning
> Christian Svensson
> Tivoli Storage Manager Certified
>

>

>
>  Cristie Nordic AB
>
>  Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30
>
>  SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77
>
>  SwedeneMail : Christian.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  Visit : Gamla Vdrmdvvdgen 4, Plan 2
>
>  web : www.cristie.com
>
>
>
>
>

>

>
>
>
>

>
>   Jacques Butcher
>
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   .CO.ZA>  cc:
>
>   Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:
>  Active Directory
> Problems
>   Dist Stor
>
>   Manager" 
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>

>
>

>
>   2003-07-11 10:53
>
>   Please respond to
>
>   "ADSM: Dist Stor
>
>   Manager"
>
>

>
>

>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone.
>
> I've restore the system volume (c:) and all system
> objects
> (of which I have a consistent backup of) successfully.  I
> can access Active Directory and see all resources.  I can
> even see all the resources from another machine through a
> UNC path.  It even prompts me for a username and and
> password.  I type the domain name\username and the
> password
> and I can see all printers, etc.
>
> I however cannot log onto or join the domain.
>
> Did anyone else get this?
>
> Any help will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> ==
> Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi
> Mobile Fun.
> http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile

Jacques Butcher
TCM (Technology Corporate Management) Software Engineer
Cell:  +27 (0)84 676 0329
Tell:  +27 (0)11 483-2000
Fax:   +27 (0)11 728-3656
Nat. IT Diploma, MCSE, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.1
Certified, NetVault Certified, IPSTor Certified,
IBM Certified Specialist - Enterprise Tape Solutions
Version 2

==
Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun.
http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile


Re: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Zlatko Krastev
Christian,

I am under impression that your posts become more and more misleading over 
time! Is this because I read them selectively or for any other reason - 
don't know. I would be rather happy to be proved wrong!!!
Also advertizement within any advice is against the principles of the 
community on this forum. Please perform your marketing activities 
privately or using a different media


Back to the topic - the problem Jacques is experiencing:
The standard Win2k recovery procedure is:
1. Install clean Windows - I install it on the *same* path and it works 
fine
2. Install TSM client - personally I prefer instead of configuring it to 
restore dsm.opt and restart the client
3. Restore *all program files* - if some application is installed on a 
drive other than C:, its binaries is better to be restores right now
4. Ignore restart message
5. Restore System State (System Object in TSM terms) and reboot.
6. (only for the only/first domain controller in DR) Make the restored AD 
data "authoritative". You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5.

The trick is to avoid joining to the domain at step 1 Keep the system 
as being part of some imaginary workgroup (better with a name which is not 
known to the domain controller/master NetBIOS browser).
In step 5 all information regarding membership to the domain will be 
restored and after reboot the server will be part of the domain. Think of 
sequence failure-reinstall-restore-reboot as of an ordinary 
shutdown-reboot with longer downtime!

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.07.2003 12:04
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Active Directory Problems



 
 
 



When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each 
file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified


 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com








 
  Jacques Butcher 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .CO.ZA>  cc: 
  Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:  Active Directory 
Problems
  Dist Stor 
  Manager"  
 
 
  2003-07-11 10:53 
  Please respond to 
  "ADSM: Dist Stor 
  Manager" 
 
 




Hi Everyone.

I've restore the system volume (c:) and all system objects
(of which I have a consistent backup of) successfully.  I
can access Active Directory and see all resources.  I can
even see all the resources from another machine through a
UNC path.  It even prompts me for a username and and
password.  I type the domain name\username and the password
and I can see all printers, etc.

I however cannot log onto or join the domain.

Did anyone else get this?

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

==
Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun.
http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile


Re: ANR9999D bfcreate.c(1906)

2003-07-11 Thread Henrik Wahlstedt
Hello,

I coulnt find any usefull on my search, even if the problem is mentioned
before.
Do you have clue why this happens?


07/09/2003 19:31:20  ANRD bfcreate.c(1918): ThreadId<60>
Destination
  switched from DIRECTORYPOOL to BACKUPPOOL2 in the
middle
  of  a transaction.
07/09/2003 19:31:20  ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 2106 for
node
  STO-SQL10 (WinNT) - internal server error
detected.

Both stgpools are on disk.

The problem started after my TSM server upgrade from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.7.0
Two of 20 NT4 servers, 3.1.0.8,  have this problem.

TIA
Henrik


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Polling or prompted?

2003-07-11 Thread Tim Smith
Hi

Just wanted to check...  I guess the best way of being sure that a schedule
runs within a certain time window is to set the duration on the server and
have the client set to "prompted".  Is there any way to do this with the
polling method?  Or if I use polling, does the client simply contact the
server every XX hours?

Thanks!

Tim Smith
([EMAIL PROTECTED])


Re: ANR9999D bfcreate.c(1906)

2003-07-11 Thread Richard Sims
>I coulnt find any usefull on my search, even if the problem is mentioned
>before.  Do you have clue why this happens?
>
>07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANRD bfcreate.c(1918): ThreadId<60> Destination
>switched from DIRECTORYPOOL to BACKUPPOOL2 in the middle
>of  a transaction.
>07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 2106 for node
>STO-SQL10 (WinNT) - internal server error detected.
>
>Both stgpools are on disk.
>
>The problem started after my TSM server upgrade from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.7.0
>Two of 20 NT4 servers, 3.1.0.8,  have this problem.

Henrik - I believe this occurred because your server upgrade finally put the
 server "out of the reach" of the antiquated client.
As IBM says, they support only recent mixes of client and server
version/releases, with anything outside that span being untested and
"unsupported".  You can only keep an old client version around for so long.

  Richard Sims, BU


Re: ANR9999D bfcreate.c(1906)

2003-07-11 Thread Henrik Wahlstedt
It struck my mind, client versions...

If I dont use DIRMC in  my opt-file, the scheduled backup runs fine.

Tivoli might have an interresting article about this but I´m locked out
from their website at the moment.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q=Destination+switched&uid=swg21110948&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en




Med vänlig hälsning



 Henrik Wahlstedt  Statoil   Phone: +46 8 429 6325  
 KTJ IT NED SE1Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24  Mobile: +46 70 429 6325
   118 88 Stockholm  E-mail:
   Sverige   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   





   

Richard Sims   

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Sent by: cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)   

"ADSM: Dist  Subject: Re: ANRD bfcreate.c(1906)

Stor Manager"  

<[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
RIST.EDU>  

   

   

2003-07-11 

13:42  

Please 

respond to 

"ADSM: Dist

Stor Manager"  

   

   





>I coulnt find any usefull on my search, even if the problem is mentioned
>before.  Do you have clue why this happens?
>
>07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANRD bfcreate.c(1918): ThreadId<60> Destination
>switched from DIRECTORYPOOL to BACKUPPOOL2 in the
middle
>of  a transaction.
>07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 2106 for node
>STO-SQL10 (WinNT) - internal server error detected.
>
>Both stgpools are on disk.
>
>The problem started after my TSM server upgrade from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.7.0
>Two of 20 NT4 servers, 3.1.0.8,  have this problem.

Henrik - I believe this occurred because your server upgrade finally put
the
 server "out of the reach" of the antiquated client.
As IBM says, they support only recent mixes of client and server
version/releases, with anything outside that span being untested and
"unsupported".  You can only keep an old client version around for so long.

  Richard Sims, BU





---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.

Re: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Jacques Butcher
Hi Cristian.

Thanks for your replies.  It's really nice to have people
trying to help you solve your problems on this forum.  I
will make an effort to spend more time on this forum trying
to help other people where I can.

Back to the topic;
I have followed the exact same procedure that you described
and is it seems as if everything is working.  The only
problem is now to join the domain and to log onto the
domain from a workstation.

I have logged a call with Microsoft and will see what they
come up with.

I however have another question for you.  I notices that
the FSMO master server that I'm restoring is not a Global
Catalog server (it is the infrastructure master).  I read
some microsoft article that mentions something that a
Global Catalog server is needed for authentication.  Would
this be my problem and is there a way around it?

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:42:00 +0300
 Zlatko Krastev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian,
>
> I am under impression that your posts become more and
> more misleading over
> time! Is this because I read them selectively or for any
> other reason -
> don't know. I would be rather happy to be proved wrong!!!
> Also advertizement within any advice is against the
> principles of the
> community on this forum. Please perform your marketing
> activities
> privately or using a different media
>
>
> Back to the topic - the problem Jacques is experiencing:
> The standard Win2k recovery procedure is:
> 1. Install clean Windows - I install it on the *same*
> path and it works
> fine
> 2. Install TSM client - personally I prefer instead of
> configuring it to
> restore dsm.opt and restart the client
> 3. Restore *all program files* - if some application is
> installed on a
> drive other than C:, its binaries is better to be
> restores right now
> 4. Ignore restart message
> 5. Restore System State (System Object in TSM terms) and
> reboot.
> 6. (only for the only/first domain controller in DR) Make
> the restored AD
> data "authoritative". You will need to be in AD recovery
> mode in step 5.
>
> The trick is to avoid joining to the domain at step 1
> Keep the system
> as being part of some imaginary workgroup (better with a
> name which is not
> known to the domain controller/master NetBIOS browser).
> In step 5 all information regarding membership to the
> domain will be
> restored and after reboot the server will be part of the
> domain. Think of
> sequence failure-reinstall-restore-reboot as of an
> ordinary
> shutdown-reboot with longer downtime!
>
> Zlatko Krastev
> IT Consultant
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 11.07.2003 12:04
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject:Re: Active Directory Problems
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> When you installed Windows on the machine.
> Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then
> restore all data
> from TSM?
> Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and
> overwrite each
> file
> with TSM?
>
> If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got
> that problem. That
> is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
> Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the
> data from TSM to
> there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in
> Restore Directory
> Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the
> server again and
> remove the temp Windows installation.
>
> Now should it work fine.
> To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool.
> Talk to IBM and they
> should give you some advice. Or can you download your own
> eval. copy from
> www.cristie.com
>
> Best Regard / Med vdnlig hdlsning
> Christian Svensson
> Tivoli Storage Manager Certified
>

>
>  Cristie Nordic AB
>
>  Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30
>
>  SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77
>
>  SwedeneMail : Christian.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  Visit : Gamla Vdrmdvvdgen 4, Plan 2
>
>  web : www.cristie.com
>
>
>
>
>

>
>
>
>
>   Jacques Butcher
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   .CO.ZA>  cc:
>   Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:
>  Active Directory
> Problems
>   Dist Stor
>   Manager"[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>   2003-07-11 10:53
>   Please respond to
>   "ADSM: Dist Stor
>   Manager"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone.
>
> I've restore the system volume (c:) and all system
> objects
> (of which I have a

Re: Polling or prompted?

2003-07-11 Thread Alexander Verkooijen
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: vrijdag 11 juli 2003 13:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Polling or prompted?
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> Just wanted to check...  I guess the best way of being sure 
> that a schedule
> runs within a certain time window is to set the duration on 
> the server and
> have the client set to "prompted".  Is there any way to do 
> this with the
> polling method?  Or if I use polling, does the client simply 
> contact the
> server every XX hours?

In polling mode the client contacts the server every X number of
hours to get the start of it's backup window.
You can define X with the QUERYSCHedperiod parameter in
dsm.sys.

Regards,

Alexander


Microsoft .Net

2003-07-11 Thread Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
Client:  W2K or Win2003 server running Microsoft.net  - B/A client version
5.1.5.9 or 5.1.6.0
TSM server:  5.1.6.2 on AIX 5.1


Has anyone else experienced problems backing up some files located in the
directory C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\...\CONFIG\   on systems
running Microsoft.Net?

The files are semi-permanent cached files that NTFS permissions do not
adhere.  In other words, you can't look at the permissions of the file.
>From what I've been told, MS's "unofficial" position is that the \config
directory does not need to be backed up.  However, some of our developers
feel that there are some files in that directory that are essential in the
case of a bare metal recovery.TSM returns a code of rc=12 and reports
the backup as failed.

Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this issue and their thoughts
on it.

Regards,

Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte and Touche USA LLP

- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


Re: DATABASE HELP!!!

2003-07-11 Thread Remco Post
On donderdag, jul 10, 2003, at 20:58 Europe/Amsterdam, T_MML wrote:

Hi all,



exists a form of edtar, manually modifying the database of the TSM?






Hi,

no, there is no way to manually edit the contents of the TSM databse.
And I have a feeling you really don't want to do that anyway. Is there
a reason you are asking?
King Regards,



Elenara Geraldo

TSM Administrator

MML Systems

Phone   : 55 41 342 7864

Cellular: 55 41 91035796



--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Remco Post

SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl
High Performance Computing  Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167
"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the
computer
industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer
industry
didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams


Loading DR tapes into an automated library

2003-07-11 Thread Michael Swinhoe
Hi,
 I need help.  I am on the last day of DR and wanted to try loading our
LTO tapes into the automated LTO library, that the DR providers have as we
are sick of loading the tapes manually?  Anyway the library is refusing to
read our barcodes even though it is the exact same library we have back at
base.  I would be very grateful if someone can shine some light?

TSM 5.1.5 (W2K)
IBM LTO 3584
8 * LTO 3580 drives
IBM tapes.

Cheers,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-

The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, copy or otherwise use it and do not disclose it to anyone else.
Please notify the sender of the delivery error and then delete the
message from your system.

Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author only.

Communications will be monitored regularly to improve our service and for
security and regulatory purposes.

Thank you for your assistance.

-


Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library

2003-07-11 Thread Tom Kauffman
What do you mean "Refusing to read"?

We did this earlier this year.

Try this:

1) Open the library
2) Insert your tapes
3) close the library
4) wait for the initialization to finish
5) Use the front-panel controls to query the library - should show the
number of tapes
6) use the front panel controls to move a tape by volser and see if you get
a list of your tapes

If #6 works, the library read your barcodes; if not, your D/R site provider
needs to investigate what's wrong.

7) within TSM, "Audit library  checklabel=barcode
8) Checkin libv  search=yes status=scratch checklabel=barcode
9) Checkin libv  search=yes status=private checklabel=barcode

For 7 thru 9 to work, your library definitions need to be correct in TSM,
and I'm not sure how that works in a Win2K envirnment as our TSM server is
AIX.

HTH --

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Loading DR tapes into an automated library
Importance: High


Hi,
 I need help.  I am on the last day of DR and wanted to try loading our
LTO tapes into the automated LTO library, that the DR providers have as we
are sick of loading the tapes manually?  Anyway the library is refusing to
read our barcodes even though it is the exact same library we have back at
base.  I would be very grateful if someone can shine some light?

TSM 5.1.5 (W2K)
IBM LTO 3584
8 * LTO 3580 drives
IBM tapes.

Cheers,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-

The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, copy or otherwise use it and do not disclose it to anyone else.
Please notify the sender of the delivery error and then delete the
message from your system.

Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author only.

Communications will be monitored regularly to improve our service and for
security and regulatory purposes.

Thank you for your assistance.

-


Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library

2003-07-11 Thread Michael Swinhoe
Tom,
 I managed to get the library to read the tapes (setup wrongly).  I
have ran an audit but it can't find any tapes.  Therefore it is no longer a
barcode issue but I am stuck again.

When checking them in as private I am define owner= as
our PLM is also AIX.

Thanks,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Tom Kauffman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCO.COM> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an 
automated library
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>


11/07/2003
15:02
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"





What do you mean "Refusing to read"?

We did this earlier this year.

Try this:

1) Open the library
2) Insert your tapes
3) close the library
4) wait for the initialization to finish
5) Use the front-panel controls to query the library - should show the
number of tapes
6) use the front panel controls to move a tape by volser and see if you get
a list of your tapes

If #6 works, the library read your barcodes; if not, your D/R site provider
needs to investigate what's wrong.

7) within TSM, "Audit library  checklabel=barcode
8) Checkin libv  search=yes status=scratch checklabel=barcode
9) Checkin libv  search=yes status=private checklabel=barcode

For 7 thru 9 to work, your library definitions need to be correct in TSM,
and I'm not sure how that works in a Win2K envirnment as our TSM server is
AIX.

HTH --

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Loading DR tapes into an automated library
Importance: High


Hi,
 I need help.  I am on the last day of DR and wanted to try loading our
LTO tapes into the automated LTO library, that the DR providers have as we
are sick of loading the tapes manually?  Anyway the library is refusing to
read our barcodes even though it is the exact same library we have back at
base.  I would be very grateful if someone can shine some light?

TSM 5.1.5 (W2K)
IBM LTO 3584
8 * LTO 3580 drives
IBM tapes.

Cheers,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-

The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, copy or otherwise use it and do not disclose it to anyone else.
Please notify the sender of the delivery error and then delete the
message from your system.

Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author only.

Communications will be monitored regularly to improve our service and for
security and regulatory purposes.

Thank you for your assistance.

-


AW: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Salak Juraj
Zlatko,
 how is it:
4)ignore restart message
..
6).. You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5

In order to be in AD recovery in step 5 I have to restart.
But a restart after (4) will probably not work because 
of mismatch between system objects left from (1) installation 
and files having been restored(3) 

What am I missing?

Juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:42
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


Christian,

I am under impression that your posts become more and more misleading over 
time! Is this because I read them selectively or for any other reason - 
don't know. I would be rather happy to be proved wrong!!!
Also advertizement within any advice is against the principles of the 
community on this forum. Please perform your marketing activities 
privately or using a different media


Back to the topic - the problem Jacques is experiencing:
The standard Win2k recovery procedure is:
1. Install clean Windows - I install it on the *same* path and it works 
fine
2. Install TSM client - personally I prefer instead of configuring it to 
restore dsm.opt and restart the client
3. Restore *all program files* - if some application is installed on a 
drive other than C:, its binaries is better to be restores right now
4. Ignore restart message
5. Restore System State (System Object in TSM terms) and reboot.
6. (only for the only/first domain controller in DR) Make the restored AD 
data "authoritative". You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5.

The trick is to avoid joining to the domain at step 1 Keep the system 
as being part of some imaginary workgroup (better with a name which is not 
known to the domain controller/master NetBIOS browser).
In step 5 all information regarding membership to the domain will be 
restored and after reboot the server will be part of the domain. Think of 
sequence failure-reinstall-restore-reboot as of an ordinary 
shutdown-reboot with longer downtime!

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.07.2003 12:04
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Active Directory Problems



 
 
 



When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each 
file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified



 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com









 
  Jacques Butcher 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .CO.ZA>  cc: 
  Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:  Active Directory 
Problems
  Dist Stor 
  Manager"  
 
 
  2003-07-11 10:53 
  Please respond to 
  "ADSM: Dist Stor 
  Manager" 
 
 




Hi Everyone.

I've restore the system volume (c:) and all system objects
(of which I have a consistent backup of) successfully.  I
can access Active Directory and see all resources.  I can
even see all the resources from another machine through a
UNC path.  It even prompts me for a username and and
password.  I type the domain name\username and the password
and I can see all printers, etc.

I however cannot log onto or join the domain.

Did anyone else get this?

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

==
Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun.
http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile


Re: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Remeta, Mark
I believe the IBM Redbook example of recovering a AD Controller is in
non-authoritative mode. It does not go into how to do a Authoritative
restore or even if one is possible. I believe they suggest you setup a new
blank DC and let AD replicate.

-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Active Directory Problems


Zlatko,
 how is it:
4)ignore restart message
..
6).. You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5

In order to be in AD recovery in step 5 I have to restart.
But a restart after (4) will probably not work because 
of mismatch between system objects left from (1) installation 
and files having been restored(3) 

What am I missing?

Juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:42
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


Christian,

I am under impression that your posts become more and more misleading over 
time! Is this because I read them selectively or for any other reason - 
don't know. I would be rather happy to be proved wrong!!!
Also advertizement within any advice is against the principles of the 
community on this forum. Please perform your marketing activities 
privately or using a different media


Back to the topic - the problem Jacques is experiencing:
The standard Win2k recovery procedure is:
1. Install clean Windows - I install it on the *same* path and it works 
fine
2. Install TSM client - personally I prefer instead of configuring it to 
restore dsm.opt and restart the client
3. Restore *all program files* - if some application is installed on a 
drive other than C:, its binaries is better to be restores right now
4. Ignore restart message
5. Restore System State (System Object in TSM terms) and reboot.
6. (only for the only/first domain controller in DR) Make the restored AD 
data "authoritative". You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5.

The trick is to avoid joining to the domain at step 1 Keep the system 
as being part of some imaginary workgroup (better with a name which is not 
known to the domain controller/master NetBIOS browser).
In step 5 all information regarding membership to the domain will be 
restored and after reboot the server will be part of the domain. Think of 
sequence failure-reinstall-restore-reboot as of an ordinary 
shutdown-reboot with longer downtime!

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.07.2003 12:04
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Active Directory Problems



 
 
 



When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each 
file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified



 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com









 
  Jacques Butcher 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .CO.ZA>  cc: 
  Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:  Active Directory 
Problems
  Dist Stor 
  Manager"  
 
 
  2003-07-11 10:53 
  Please respond to 
  "ADSM: Dist Stor 
  Manager" 
 
 




Hi Everyone.

I've restore the system volume (c:) and all system objects
(of which I have a consistent backup of) successfully.  I
can access Active Directory and see all resources.  I can
even see all the resources from another machine through a
UNC path.  It even prompts me for a username and and
password.  I 

Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library

2003-07-11 Thread Michael Swinhoe
Tom,
 I can now check the tapes in but our barcodes are 6 digits and when I
checked the tapes in as scratch it has tagged 2 extra digits onto the end.
Do you know how to resolve this?

Thanks,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
Zurich Financial Services
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Tom Kauffman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCO.COM> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an 
automated library
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>


11/07/2003
15:02
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"





What do you mean "Refusing to read"?

We did this earlier this year.

Try this:

1) Open the library
2) Insert your tapes
3) close the library
4) wait for the initialization to finish
5) Use the front-panel controls to query the library - should show the
number of tapes
6) use the front panel controls to move a tape by volser and see if you get
a list of your tapes

If #6 works, the library read your barcodes; if not, your D/R site provider
needs to investigate what's wrong.

7) within TSM, "Audit library  checklabel=barcode
8) Checkin libv  search=yes status=scratch checklabel=barcode
9) Checkin libv  search=yes status=private checklabel=barcode

For 7 thru 9 to work, your library definitions need to be correct in TSM,
and I'm not sure how that works in a Win2K envirnment as our TSM server is
AIX.

HTH --

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Loading DR tapes into an automated library
Importance: High


Hi,
 I need help.  I am on the last day of DR and wanted to try loading our
LTO tapes into the automated LTO library, that the DR providers have as we
are sick of loading the tapes manually?  Anyway the library is refusing to
read our barcodes even though it is the exact same library we have back at
base.  I would be very grateful if someone can shine some light?

TSM 5.1.5 (W2K)
IBM LTO 3584
8 * LTO 3580 drives
IBM tapes.

Cheers,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-

The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, copy or otherwise use it and do not disclose it to anyone else.
Please notify the sender of the delivery error and then delete the
message from your system.

Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author only.

Communications will be monitored regularly to improve our service and for
security and regulatory purposes.

Thank you for your assistance.

-


Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library

2003-07-11 Thread Tom Kauffman
Mike --

I've never seen this; no clues, unfortunately. Would these be the "L1" code
at the end of the barcode label?

This is the point where I'd drag in the local D/R site support people and
also consider a call to Tivoli support.

And, the way we run D/R tests here, we would set this issue up as a primary
objective for the next D/R test (a "Primary Objective" that we cannot make
work becomes a D/R test failure that shows up in a LARGE number of reviews).

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library


Tom,
 I can now check the tapes in but our barcodes are 6 digits and when I
checked the tapes in as scratch it has tagged 2 extra digits onto the end.
Do you know how to resolve this?

Thanks,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
Zurich Financial Services
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Tom Kauffman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCO.COM> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes
into an automated library
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>


11/07/2003
15:02
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"





What do you mean "Refusing to read"?

We did this earlier this year.

Try this:

1) Open the library
2) Insert your tapes
3) close the library
4) wait for the initialization to finish
5) Use the front-panel controls to query the library - should show the
number of tapes
6) use the front panel controls to move a tape by volser and see if you get
a list of your tapes

If #6 works, the library read your barcodes; if not, your D/R site provider
needs to investigate what's wrong.

7) within TSM, "Audit library  checklabel=barcode
8) Checkin libv  search=yes status=scratch checklabel=barcode
9) Checkin libv  search=yes status=private checklabel=barcode

For 7 thru 9 to work, your library definitions need to be correct in TSM,
and I'm not sure how that works in a Win2K envirnment as our TSM server is
AIX.

HTH --

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Loading DR tapes into an automated library
Importance: High


Hi,
 I need help.  I am on the last day of DR and wanted to try loading our
LTO tapes into the automated LTO library, that the DR providers have as we
are sick of loading the tapes manually?  Anyway the library is refusing to
read our barcodes even though it is the exact same library we have back at
base.  I would be very grateful if someone can shine some light?

TSM 5.1.5 (W2K)
IBM LTO 3584
8 * LTO 3580 drives
IBM tapes.

Cheers,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-

The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, copy or otherwise use it and do not disclose it to anyone else.
Please notify the sender of the delivery error and then delete the
message from your system.

Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author only.

Communications will be monitored regularly to improve our service and for
security and regulatory purposes.

Thank you for your assistance.

-


MSCS Win2K, TSM Journal Backups and SAN attached disks!!!

2003-07-11 Thread David McClelland
*SMers,

I understand from searching back on the list that this one might be a
bit of a hot potato, but here goes anyway:

We'd ideally like to set up TSM Journaling on a Win2K MSCS Cluster using
TSM 4.2 Client with SAN attached disk.

So, my questions are:

o) Does the TSM Journal Engine support SAN-attached disks - I
recall something about the Win32 api ReadDirectoryChangesW only
monitoring 'local' file system changes - does this preclude SAN attached
disk?
o) Would this work in an MSCS cluster?

Has anyone done this, or tried to? Any advice?

Any help greatly received, as always!

Rgds,

David McClelland
Global Management Systems
Reuters Ltd


--- -
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.


AW: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Salak Juraj
Jack,

once you have a proven process for restoring AD
it would be invaluable if you could post it here.
There have been many experiences with restoring W2k published here,
but as for AD Servers I am missing reports about 
real succesfull restores.

I personally tried earlier Zlatko´s-like procedure,
ended with working AD but only after I reinstalled
video and network drivers,
which was absolutely dubious and left bad feeling
and I never saw things like that after having non-AD servers reinstalled.

It is not clear from your e-mail 
which procedure did you succesfully follow - you name 
christian while having attached zlatko´´s procedure ;)

best regards
Juraj Salak


P.S. 
just an angry weep - ignore it if you don´t have both 
a bottle of beer on the table and melancholical spirit;)

The AD has disastreous design from the 
system management point of view, does not it?
The tight coupling betweenn application and operating system is a ...beep...
.
One can NOT backup/restore AD, 
one only can backup/restore complete operating system.
This is not complaint about TSM, this limitation is inherited to the AD
design.

For example, once an AD server HW will not work 
and no compatible HW can be purchased,
one cannot install new OS on a new machine and restore AD.
One has to install and configure AD again and have it replicated.. 
In slow WAN painfull. And what about FSMO´s??

There is good detailed description from microsoft how to backup/restore AD.
Not a subject to be tested in real life. Too many scenarios with different 
procedures - a comprehensive test would take much, much time.

And - one is limited to one domain per computer. 
So I have two servers doing almost nothing but presenting proud logo 
of beeing a forest domain controller.

A good design is possible. e.g. Novel has it.
But so little apps do support this product...

There is a positive point about it - the job creation effect: 
many good payed engineers spend their time solving this unneccessary
problem.
Just like in old times as they 
configured memory extenders for the so-called operating system "DOS" 
in long trial and error only to have it use the real memory in the
computer..

It makes me dumpish to see what kind of 
software uses to win the market battle
and what sort of unnecessary problems do we have to cope with.

My beer is empty - hurray into holliday!

old Juraj




-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jacques Butcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 14:23
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


Hi Cristian.

Thanks for your replies.  It's really nice to have people
trying to help you solve your problems on this forum.  I
will make an effort to spend more time on this forum trying
to help other people where I can.

Back to the topic;
I have followed the exact same procedure that you described
and is it seems as if everything is working.  The only
problem is now to join the domain and to log onto the
domain from a workstation.

I have logged a call with Microsoft and will see what they
come up with.

I however have another question for you.  I notices that
the FSMO master server that I'm restoring is not a Global
Catalog server (it is the infrastructure master).  I read
some microsoft article that mentions something that a
Global Catalog server is needed for authentication.  Would
this be my problem and is there a way around it?

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:42:00 +0300
 Zlatko Krastev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian,
>
> I am under impression that your posts become more and
> more misleading over
> time! Is this because I read them selectively or for any
> other reason -
> don't know. I would be rather happy to be proved wrong!!!
> Also advertizement within any advice is against the
> principles of the
> community on this forum. Please perform your marketing
> activities
> privately or using a different media
>
>
> Back to the topic - the problem Jacques is experiencing:
> The standard Win2k recovery procedure is:
> 1. Install clean Windows - I install it on the *same*
> path and it works
> fine
> 2. Install TSM client - personally I prefer instead of
> configuring it to
> restore dsm.opt and restart the client
> 3. Restore *all program files* - if some application is
> installed on a
> drive other than C:, its binaries is better to be
> restores right now
> 4. Ignore restart message
> 5. Restore System State (System Object in TSM terms) and
> reboot.
> 6. (only for the only/first domain controller in DR) Make
> the restored AD
> data "authoritative". You will need to be in AD recovery
> mode in step 5.
>
> The trick is to avoid joining to the domain at step 1
> Keep the system
> as being part of some imaginary workgroup (better with a
> name which is not
> known to the domain controller/master NetBIOS browser).
> In step 5 all information regarding membership to the
> domain will be
> restored and after reboot the server will be part of the
> domain. Think of
> sequence fail

AW: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Salak Juraj
which is good enough after an HW error.
But not after having repliacted an configuration error.
Juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 16:55
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


I believe the IBM Redbook example of recovering a AD Controller is in
non-authoritative mode. It does not go into how to do a Authoritative
restore or even if one is possible. I believe they suggest you setup a new
blank DC and let AD replicate.

-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Active Directory Problems


Zlatko,
 how is it:
4)ignore restart message
..
6).. You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5

In order to be in AD recovery in step 5 I have to restart.
But a restart after (4) will probably not work because 
of mismatch between system objects left from (1) installation 
and files having been restored(3) 

What am I missing?

Juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:42
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


Christian,

I am under impression that your posts become more and more misleading over 
time! Is this because I read them selectively or for any other reason - 
don't know. I would be rather happy to be proved wrong!!!
Also advertizement within any advice is against the principles of the 
community on this forum. Please perform your marketing activities 
privately or using a different media


Back to the topic - the problem Jacques is experiencing:
The standard Win2k recovery procedure is:
1. Install clean Windows - I install it on the *same* path and it works 
fine
2. Install TSM client - personally I prefer instead of configuring it to 
restore dsm.opt and restart the client
3. Restore *all program files* - if some application is installed on a 
drive other than C:, its binaries is better to be restores right now
4. Ignore restart message
5. Restore System State (System Object in TSM terms) and reboot.
6. (only for the only/first domain controller in DR) Make the restored AD 
data "authoritative". You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5.

The trick is to avoid joining to the domain at step 1 Keep the system 
as being part of some imaginary workgroup (better with a name which is not 
known to the domain controller/master NetBIOS browser).
In step 5 all information regarding membership to the domain will be 
restored and after reboot the server will be part of the domain. Think of 
sequence failure-reinstall-restore-reboot as of an ordinary 
shutdown-reboot with longer downtime!

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.07.2003 12:04
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Active Directory Problems



 
 
 



When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each 
file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified



 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com









 
  Jacques Butcher 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .CO.ZA>  cc: 
  Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:  Active Directory 
Problems
  Dist Stor 
  Manager"  
 
 
  2003-07-11 10:53 
  Please respond to 
  "ADSM: Dist Stor 
  Manager" 
 
 




Hi Everyone.

I've restore th

Re: TSM and mod-27 devices

2003-07-11 Thread Gee, Norman
You are still limited to a maximum linear VSAM file size of about 4GB.  You
cannot define a single large dataset to used up the entire mod-27 like you
can on an AIX system.

-Original Message-
From: Sam Sheppard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM and mod-27 devices


 Top of message 
>>--> 07-10-03  14:25  S.SHEPPARD (SHS)TSM and mod-27 devices

Well, I'll take a stab at this.  We just converted from an old RVA to
an ESS-800 and wondered the same thing.  General agreement seemed to be
there weren't really any advantages to mod-27 unless you're running out
of addresses and there were some downsides, mainly the inability to
start more than one I/O to the device at a time without PAV. I'm not
really sure what kind of problems you might see, performancewise. Might
be OK.  There is also the size limitations on the log/db which would
prevent you from using the entire 25GB with one dataset.

There are probably other considerations, but we had no reason not to
just stick to lots of mod-3s.

I know I asked the same thing here about a month ago and didn't get
much feedback.  Anyone else tried this?

Sam Sheppard
San Diego Data Processing Corp.
(858)-581-9668
---`


 Top of message 
>>--> 07-10-03  07:46  ..NETMAIL () TSM and mod-27 devices
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:39:35 -0500
From: "Glass, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TSM and mod-27 devices
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_Top_of_Message_


We're running a V5 TSM Server on an MVS platform, and considering the use of
mod-27s for its DASD needs.
Are there any known issues regarding the use of mod-27 DASD devices for TSM
db, log, or backup/archive pool volumes?
Thanks, in advance.

Peter Glass
MVS Storage Management

---`


Windows client error and TDP for Exchange question

2003-07-11 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi *SM-ers!
I have a Windows 4.1.3 client with several of the following messages in the
error log:

7/09/2003 02:42:24 File 'E:\EXCHSRVR\mtadata\DB007FAC.DAT' truncated while
reading in Shared Static mode.
07/09/2003 02:42:25 File 'E:\EXCHSRVR\mtadata\DB007FB0.DAT' truncated while
reading in Shared Static mode.

I can't find an APAR for this, well at least not for the Windows client.
Does anybody know what's the cause of this?

Also, there is a TDP for Exchange client installed on this machine.
According to the manual the backup of the Exchange Tracking Log is vital for
recovery, but TSM doesn't seem to be able to back it up:

07/10/2003 02:27:30 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\x1fd009\e$\EXCHSRVR\tracking.log\20030710.log' failed
07/10/2003 02:27:30 ANS4037E File
'\\x1fd009\e$\EXCHSRVR\tracking.log\20030710.log' changed during processing.
File skipped.

Is this normal behavior?
Thank you very much for any reply in advance!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. 
This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material 
intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that 
no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and 
may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender 
immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart 
Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for 
the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor 
responsible for any delay in receipt.
**


Re: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Remeta, Mark
Isn't there some way to, after doing a non-authoritative restore of AD with
TSM, to mark the restored database as the master and overwrite the other
existing DC's with the new restored copy? 

Mark


-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Active Directory Problems


which is good enough after an HW error.
But not after having repliacted an configuration error.
Juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 16:55
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


I believe the IBM Redbook example of recovering a AD Controller is in
non-authoritative mode. It does not go into how to do a Authoritative
restore or even if one is possible. I believe they suggest you setup a new
blank DC and let AD replicate.

-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Active Directory Problems


Zlatko,
 how is it:
4)ignore restart message
..
6).. You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5

In order to be in AD recovery in step 5 I have to restart.
But a restart after (4) will probably not work because 
of mismatch between system objects left from (1) installation 
and files having been restored(3) 

What am I missing?

Juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:42
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


Christian,

I am under impression that your posts become more and more misleading over 
time! Is this because I read them selectively or for any other reason - 
don't know. I would be rather happy to be proved wrong!!!
Also advertizement within any advice is against the principles of the 
community on this forum. Please perform your marketing activities 
privately or using a different media


Back to the topic - the problem Jacques is experiencing:
The standard Win2k recovery procedure is:
1. Install clean Windows - I install it on the *same* path and it works 
fine
2. Install TSM client - personally I prefer instead of configuring it to 
restore dsm.opt and restart the client
3. Restore *all program files* - if some application is installed on a 
drive other than C:, its binaries is better to be restores right now
4. Ignore restart message
5. Restore System State (System Object in TSM terms) and reboot.
6. (only for the only/first domain controller in DR) Make the restored AD 
data "authoritative". You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5.

The trick is to avoid joining to the domain at step 1 Keep the system 
as being part of some imaginary workgroup (better with a name which is not 
known to the domain controller/master NetBIOS browser).
In step 5 all information regarding membership to the domain will be 
restored and after reboot the server will be part of the domain. Think of 
sequence failure-reinstall-restore-reboot as of an ordinary 
shutdown-reboot with longer downtime!

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.07.2003 12:04
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Active Directory Problems



 
 
 



When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each 
file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified



 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com









 
  Jacques Butcher 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .CO

AW: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Salak Juraj
yes, there ist.
It should be ( I read but did not test it)
-   use NTDSUTIL
-   Restart server in normal mode
-   Restore System Volume SYSVOL

According to what I read by microsoft, 
this can be used to restore all of AD but old schema. 
This notice leaves me in quite unsure state.
regards
juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 17:46
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


Isn't there some way to, after doing a non-authoritative restore of AD with
TSM, to mark the restored database as the master and overwrite the other
existing DC's with the new restored copy? 

Mark


-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Active Directory Problems


which is good enough after an HW error.
But not after having repliacted an configuration error.
Juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 16:55
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


I believe the IBM Redbook example of recovering a AD Controller is in
non-authoritative mode. It does not go into how to do a Authoritative
restore or even if one is possible. I believe they suggest you setup a new
blank DC and let AD replicate.

-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Active Directory Problems


Zlatko,
 how is it:
4)ignore restart message
..
6).. You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5

In order to be in AD recovery in step 5 I have to restart.
But a restart after (4) will probably not work because 
of mismatch between system objects left from (1) installation 
and files having been restored(3) 

What am I missing?

Juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:42
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


Christian,

I am under impression that your posts become more and more misleading over 
time! Is this because I read them selectively or for any other reason - 
don't know. I would be rather happy to be proved wrong!!!
Also advertizement within any advice is against the principles of the 
community on this forum. Please perform your marketing activities 
privately or using a different media


Back to the topic - the problem Jacques is experiencing:
The standard Win2k recovery procedure is:
1. Install clean Windows - I install it on the *same* path and it works 
fine
2. Install TSM client - personally I prefer instead of configuring it to 
restore dsm.opt and restart the client
3. Restore *all program files* - if some application is installed on a 
drive other than C:, its binaries is better to be restores right now
4. Ignore restart message
5. Restore System State (System Object in TSM terms) and reboot.
6. (only for the only/first domain controller in DR) Make the restored AD 
data "authoritative". You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5.

The trick is to avoid joining to the domain at step 1 Keep the system 
as being part of some imaginary workgroup (better with a name which is not 
known to the domain controller/master NetBIOS browser).
In step 5 all information regarding membership to the domain will be 
restored and after reboot the server will be part of the domain. Think of 
sequence failure-reinstall-restore-reboot as of an ordinary 
shutdown-reboot with longer downtime!

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.07.2003 12:04
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Active Directory Problems



 
 
 



When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each 
file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified



 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 

Re: AIX Upgrade from 4.3.3 to 5.1

2003-07-11 Thread Justin Derrick
Follow the directions for the 5.1 to ML4 upgrade explicitly -- I
un-tar'd everything into one directory and let smit have it's way,
which was a huge mistake -- thankfully it was a brand new server with
nothing on it.
It's also a good idea to back up /usr/ccs/lib/libc.a to somewhere
else, like /tmp or even / before any big upgrade.  If libc.a gets
corrupted during the upgrade process (it's happened before), this
preventative measure will allow you to recover the box instead of
forcing you to re-install and try to recover your old volume groups.
(FYI, you switch to the old libc.a by using 'set LIBPATH=/tmp'.)
-JD.

I'm going to be upgrading my TSM server from 4.3.3 ML10 to 5.1 ML?.  My TSM
version is 5.1.1.6.  Has anybody had any problems with ML4?
Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


TSM/AIX problem or AIX/TSM problem??!?

2003-07-11 Thread Prather, Wanda
Need some help from you AIX wizards out there.

I have a new TSM environment; there are 4 p-series servers, all at AIX 5.1
in 32bit mode.

One is a dedicated TSM server, with the unimaginative hostname of "TSM".
(OK, so we're not creative - that's why we have the techie jobs...)

The other 3 servers have hostnames like P6.

The TSM server is 5.1.6.3; the TSM clients are all 5.1.6.something.
The P6 severs back up (incremental) to the TSM server nightly, on a
POLLING schedule.
Incrementals are all done by 2am.
The clients contact the server every 8 hours for work (queryschedperiod 8).
>From their dsmsched.log files, everything seems to be working fine.

Here's the problem:
On each of the P6 hosts, (but not the TSM server), the syslog shows LOTS
of records like the ones below, coming every 20 minutes to an hour apart,
every day.

It appears that the TSM server is trying to contact them on some sort of
virtual terminal session?
There is no TELNET or FTP scheduled between the servers, and since nothing
is broke, I don't know what to look for to fix.  There is no process on any
machine named "TSM".  Rebooting the TSM server doesn't stop it.

Can anybody tell me what these records represent?  Thanks!

+
Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm: /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out --
possible noise on port
Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out
-- possible noise on port
Jul  9 14:08:20 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/34: 3004-031 Password read timed out
-- possible noise on port
etc
etc


Re: TSM/AIX problem or AIX/TSM problem??!?

2003-07-11 Thread Bob Booth - UIUC
Wrong 'tsm'.  tsm is the module in AIX (SYSV) that is the login broker (it
does getty, and login).

The messages below indicate that something is getting a 'password: ' prompt
but not typing anything or hitting enter before a timeout value.

You are not looking at a TSM (ADSM, WDSF...) problem here, you are looking
at a AIX thing.  Look to see if you have some type of monitoring set up that
trys to log in to the machine at an interval to see if it is responding.

bob

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:02:23PM -0400, Prather, Wanda wrote:
> Need some help from you AIX wizards out there.
>
> I have a new TSM environment; there are 4 p-series servers, all at AIX 5.1
> in 32bit mode.
>
> One is a dedicated TSM server, with the unimaginative hostname of "TSM".
> (OK, so we're not creative - that's why we have the techie jobs...)
>
> The other 3 servers have hostnames like P6.
>
> The TSM server is 5.1.6.3; the TSM clients are all 5.1.6.something.
> The P6 severs back up (incremental) to the TSM server nightly, on a
> POLLING schedule.
> Incrementals are all done by 2am.
> The clients contact the server every 8 hours for work (queryschedperiod 8).
> >From their dsmsched.log files, everything seems to be working fine.
>
> Here's the problem:
> On each of the P6 hosts, (but not the TSM server), the syslog shows LOTS
> of records like the ones below, coming every 20 minutes to an hour apart,
> every day.
>
> It appears that the TSM server is trying to contact them on some sort of
> virtual terminal session?
> There is no TELNET or FTP scheduled between the servers, and since nothing
> is broke, I don't know what to look for to fix.  There is no process on any
> machine named "TSM".  Rebooting the TSM server doesn't stop it.
>
> Can anybody tell me what these records represent?  Thanks!
>
> +
> Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm: /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out --
> possible noise on port
> Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out
> -- possible noise on port
> Jul  9 14:08:20 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/34: 3004-031 Password read timed out
> -- possible noise on port
> etc
> etc


Re: TSM/AIX problem or AIX/TSM problem??!?

2003-07-11 Thread Justin Derrick
In this case, 'tsm' is different from 'TSM'.  'tsm' is the program
used by functions like 'login' on AIX.  I suspect someone is trying
to connect to your machine via telnet or ftp, and never logging in.
-JD.

Need some help from you AIX wizards out there.

I have a new TSM environment; there are 4 p-series servers, all at AIX 5.1
in 32bit mode.
One is a dedicated TSM server, with the unimaginative hostname of "TSM".
(OK, so we're not creative - that's why we have the techie jobs...)
The other 3 servers have hostnames like P6.

The TSM server is 5.1.6.3; the TSM clients are all 5.1.6.something.
The P6 severs back up (incremental) to the TSM server nightly, on a
POLLING schedule.
Incrementals are all done by 2am.
The clients contact the server every 8 hours for work (queryschedperiod 8).
From their dsmsched.log files, everything seems to be working fine.
Here's the problem:
On each of the P6 hosts, (but not the TSM server), the syslog shows LOTS
of records like the ones below, coming every 20 minutes to an hour apart,
every day.
It appears that the TSM server is trying to contact them on some sort of
virtual terminal session?
There is no TELNET or FTP scheduled between the servers, and since nothing
is broke, I don't know what to look for to fix.  There is no process on any
machine named "TSM".  Rebooting the TSM server doesn't stop it.
Can anybody tell me what these records represent?  Thanks!

+
Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm: /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out --
possible noise on port
Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out
-- possible noise on port
Jul  9 14:08:20 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/34: 3004-031 Password read timed out
-- possible noise on port
etc
etc


Re: TSM/AIX problem or AIX/TSM problem??!?

2003-07-11 Thread David Longo
Yes, do a "man tsm" at AIX prompt.

David Longo

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/11/03 01:12PM >>>
Wrong 'tsm'.  tsm is the module in AIX (SYSV) that is the login broker (it
does getty, and login).

The messages below indicate that something is getting a 'password: ' prompt
but not typing anything or hitting enter before a timeout value.

You are not looking at a TSM (ADSM, WDSF...) problem here, you are looking
at a AIX thing.  Look to see if you have some type of monitoring set up that
trys to log in to the machine at an interval to see if it is responding.

bob

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:02:23PM -0400, Prather, Wanda wrote:
> Need some help from you AIX wizards out there.
>
> I have a new TSM environment; there are 4 p-series servers, all at AIX 5.1
> in 32bit mode.
>
> One is a dedicated TSM server, with the unimaginative hostname of "TSM".
> (OK, so we're not creative - that's why we have the techie jobs...)
>
> The other 3 servers have hostnames like P6.
>
> The TSM server is 5.1.6.3; the TSM clients are all 5.1.6.something.
> The P6 severs back up (incremental) to the TSM server nightly, on a
> POLLING schedule.
> Incrementals are all done by 2am.
> The clients contact the server every 8 hours for work (queryschedperiod 8).
> >From their dsmsched.log files, everything seems to be working fine.
>
> Here's the problem:
> On each of the P6 hosts, (but not the TSM server), the syslog shows LOTS
> of records like the ones below, coming every 20 minutes to an hour apart,
> every day.
>
> It appears that the TSM server is trying to contact them on some sort of
> virtual terminal session?
> There is no TELNET or FTP scheduled between the servers, and since nothing
> is broke, I don't know what to look for to fix.  There is no process on any
> machine named "TSM".  Rebooting the TSM server doesn't stop it.
>
> Can anybody tell me what these records represent?  Thanks!
>
> +
> Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm: /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out --
> possible noise on port
> Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out
> -- possible noise on port
> Jul  9 14:08:20 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/34: 3004-031 Password read timed out
> -- possible noise on port
> etc
> etc

##
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may 
contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged 
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or 
lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message 
in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it 
from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify 
the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, 
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message
if you are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its
networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in this message
are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where
the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of 
a particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by 
the entity to give such views or opinions.
##


Re: TSM/AIX problem or AIX/TSM problem??!?

2003-07-11 Thread Prather, Wanda
AH!!! Many thanks to all of you who responded, this is just the information
I need!

(Couldn't survive without this list!)

-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM/AIX problem or AIX/TSM problem??!?


Yes, do a "man tsm" at AIX prompt.

David Longo

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/11/03 01:12PM >>>
Wrong 'tsm'.  tsm is the module in AIX (SYSV) that is the login broker (it
does getty, and login).

The messages below indicate that something is getting a 'password: ' prompt
but not typing anything or hitting enter before a timeout value.

You are not looking at a TSM (ADSM, WDSF...) problem here, you are looking
at a AIX thing.  Look to see if you have some type of monitoring set up that
trys to log in to the machine at an interval to see if it is responding.

bob

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:02:23PM -0400, Prather, Wanda wrote:
> Need some help from you AIX wizards out there.
>
> I have a new TSM environment; there are 4 p-series servers, all at AIX 5.1
> in 32bit mode.
>
> One is a dedicated TSM server, with the unimaginative hostname of "TSM".
> (OK, so we're not creative - that's why we have the techie jobs...)
>
> The other 3 servers have hostnames like P6.
>
> The TSM server is 5.1.6.3; the TSM clients are all 5.1.6.something.
> The P6 severs back up (incremental) to the TSM server nightly, on a
> POLLING schedule.
> Incrementals are all done by 2am.
> The clients contact the server every 8 hours for work (queryschedperiod
8).
> >From their dsmsched.log files, everything seems to be working fine.
>
> Here's the problem:
> On each of the P6 hosts, (but not the TSM server), the syslog shows
LOTS
> of records like the ones below, coming every 20 minutes to an hour apart,
> every day.
>
> It appears that the TSM server is trying to contact them on some sort of
> virtual terminal session?
> There is no TELNET or FTP scheduled between the servers, and since nothing
> is broke, I don't know what to look for to fix.  There is no process on
any
> machine named "TSM".  Rebooting the TSM server doesn't stop it.
>
> Can anybody tell me what these records represent?  Thanks!
>
> +
> Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm: /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out
--
> possible noise on port
> Jul  9 14:07:29 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/31: 3004-031 Password read timed out
> -- possible noise on port
> Jul  9 14:08:20 p6 tsm:  /dev/pts/34: 3004-031 Password read timed out
> -- possible noise on port
> etc
> etc

##
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may
contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message
in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it
from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify
the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message
if you are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its
networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in this message
are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where
the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of
a particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by
the entity to give such views or opinions.
##


Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library

2003-07-11 Thread Stapleton, Mark
The library you are using is reading the "extended" version of the LTO barcode (the 
bit with the "L1" in it). You need to change the way the library reads the barcode 
from "extended" to "normal".
 
P.S. This probably also means that your DR provider is not using the latest microcode 
on the library.
 
--
Mark Stapleton
 

-Original Message- 
From: Tom Kauffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Fri 7/11/2003 10:13 AM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library



Mike --

I've never seen this; no clues, unfortunately. Would these be the "L1" code
at the end of the barcode label?

This is the point where I'd drag in the local D/R site support people and
also consider a call to Tivoli support.

And, the way we run D/R tests here, we would set this issue up as a primary
objective for the next D/R test (a "Primary Objective" that we cannot make
work becomes a D/R test failure that shows up in a LARGE number of reviews).

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library


Tom,
 I can now check the tapes in but our barcodes are 6 digits and when I
checked the tapes in as scratch it has tagged 2 extra digits onto the end.
Do you know how to resolve this?

Thanks,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
Zurich Financial Services
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Tom Kauffman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCO.COM> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes
into an automated library
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>


11/07/2003
15:02
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"





What do you mean "Refusing to read"?

We did this earlier this year.

Try this:

1) Open the library
2) Insert your tapes
3) close the library
4) wait for the initialization to finish
5) Use the front-panel controls to query the library - should show the
number of tapes
6) use the front panel controls to move a tape by volser and see if you get
a list of your tapes

If #6 works, the library read your barcodes; if not, your D/R site provider
needs to investigate what's wrong.

7) within TSM, "Audit library  checklabel=barcode
8) Checkin libv  search=yes status=scratch checklabel=barcode
9) Checkin libv  search=yes status=private checklabel=barcode

For 7 thru 9 to work, your library definitions need to be correct in TSM,
and I'm not sure how that works in a Win2K envirnment as our TSM server is
AIX.

HTH --

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Loading DR tapes into an automated library
Importance: High


Hi,
 I need help.  I am on the last day of DR and wanted to try loading our
LTO tapes into the automated LTO library, that the DR providers have as we
are sick of loading the tapes manually?  Anyway the library is refusing to
read our barcodes even though it is the exact same library we have back at
base.  I would be very grateful if someone can shine some light?

TSM 5.1.5 (W2K)
IBM LTO 3584
8 * LTO 3580 drives
IBM tapes.

Cheers,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-

The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, copy or otherwi

Re: AW: Active Directory Problems

2003-07-11 Thread Zlatko Krastev
Juraj,

you need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5. But usually if when files 
restore is done and System State restore is not, the system end up with 
BSOD. Therefore you have to enter AD recovery mode somewhere before step 
3. If you are familiar with the sequence of installing Win2k, then last 
reboot in step 1 can be used for that purpose. Otherwise you have to 
perform one more reboot before step 3.

--> [Mark] ... I believe they suggest you setup a new blank DC and let AD replicate. 
...

If you are in DR scenario there is no DC to replicate from. Thus you have 
to promote the restored AD to authoritative state using NTDSUTIL as M$ 
suggests.
Unfortunately I do not know wouldn't be there some problems with an 
extended schema. I recall such a problem with Netware NDS - when schema 
was extended by an installed product, you have to perform clean install of 
NW + install the application and only then restore the NDS.

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Salak Juraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.07.2003 17:51
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:AW: Active Directory Problems


Zlatko,
 how is it:
4)ignore restart message
..
6).. You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5

In order to be in AD recovery in step 5 I have to restart.
But a restart after (4) will probably not work because 
of mismatch between system objects left from (1) installation 
and files having been restored(3) 

What am I missing?

Juraj


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:42
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Active Directory Problems


Christian,

I am under impression that your posts become more and more misleading over 

time! Is this because I read them selectively or for any other reason - 
don't know. I would be rather happy to be proved wrong!!!
Also advertizement within any advice is against the principles of the 
community on this forum. Please perform your marketing activities 
privately or using a different media


Back to the topic - the problem Jacques is experiencing:
The standard Win2k recovery procedure is:
1. Install clean Windows - I install it on the *same* path and it works 
fine
2. Install TSM client - personally I prefer instead of configuring it to 
restore dsm.opt and restart the client
3. Restore *all program files* - if some application is installed on a 
drive other than C:, its binaries is better to be restores right now
4. Ignore restart message
5. Restore System State (System Object in TSM terms) and reboot.
6. (only for the only/first domain controller in DR) Make the restored AD 
data "authoritative". You will need to be in AD recovery mode in step 5.

The trick is to avoid joining to the domain at step 1 Keep the system 
as being part of some imaginary workgroup (better with a name which is not 

known to the domain controller/master NetBIOS browser).
In step 5 all information regarding membership to the domain will be 
restored and after reboot the server will be part of the domain. Think of 
sequence failure-reinstall-restore-reboot as of an ordinary 
shutdown-reboot with longer downtime!

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.07.2003 12:04
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Active Directory Problems



 
 
 



When you installed Windows on the machine.
Did you installed Windows in a Temp directory and then restore all data
from TSM?
Or did you installed Windows in there standard path and overwrite each 
file
with TSM?

If you did the last thing. I can understand way you got that problem. That
is becuse you got a new SID and et c.
Try to install Windows in a Temp Path and restore the data from TSM to
there normal PATH. Reboot the server and boot up in Restore Directory
Service mode and restore the System Object. Reboot the server again and
remove the temp Windows installation.

Now should it work fine.
To do this much easyer. Buy a Disaster Recovery tool. Talk to IBM and they
should give you some advice. Or can you download your own eval. copy from
www.cristie.com

Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning
Christian Svensson
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified



 Cristie Nordic AB

 Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30

 SE-131 06 Nacka   Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77

 SwedeneMail : Christian.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2

 web : www.cristie.com






Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library

2003-07-11 Thread Coats, Jack
I ran into this on my production system when we upgraded microcode and did
some library
expansion (added internal slots, expanded the door, and added drives).

You need to go into the library setup pannel and change it to use the
'extended' barcodes.
I had to pull all the tapes out of the library, and re-check them all in for
it to work,
but we only have a partially loaded 3583, not a big library.

After that it worked like a champ.

-Original Message-
From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library


The library you are using is reading the "extended" version of the LTO
barcode (the bit with the "L1" in it). You need to change the way the
library reads the barcode from "extended" to "normal".

P.S. This probably also means that your DR provider is not using the latest
microcode on the library.

--
Mark Stapleton


-Original Message-
From: Tom Kauffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 7/11/2003 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library



Mike --

I've never seen this; no clues, unfortunately. Would these be the
"L1" code
at the end of the barcode label?

This is the point where I'd drag in the local D/R site support
people and
also consider a call to Tivoli support.

And, the way we run D/R tests here, we would set this issue up as a
primary
objective for the next D/R test (a "Primary Objective" that we
cannot make
work becomes a D/R test failure that shows up in a LARGE number of
reviews).

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library


Tom,
 I can now check the tapes in but our barcodes are 6 digits and
when I
checked the tapes in as scratch it has tagged 2 extra digits onto
the end.
Do you know how to resolve this?

Thanks,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
Zurich Financial Services
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Tom Kauffman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCO.COM> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Loading DR
tapes
into an automated library
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>


11/07/2003
15:02
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"





What do you mean "Refusing to read"?

We did this earlier this year.

Try this:

1) Open the library
2) Insert your tapes
3) close the library
4) wait for the initialization to finish
5) Use the front-panel controls to query the library - should show
the
number of tapes
6) use the front panel controls to move a tape by volser and see if
you get
a list of your tapes

If #6 works, the library read your barcodes; if not, your D/R site
provider
needs to investigate what's wrong.

7) within TSM, "Audit library  checklabel=barcode
8) Checkin libv  search=yes status=scratch
checklabel=barcode
9) Checkin libv  search=yes status=private
checklabel=barcode

For 7 thru 9 to work, your library definitions need to be correct in
TSM,
and I'm not sure how that works in a Win2K envirnment as our TSM
server is
AIX.

HTH --

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Loading DR tapes into an automated library
Importance: High


Hi,
 I need help.  I am on the last day of DR and wanted to try
loading our
LTO tapes into the automated LTO library, that the DR providers have
as we
are sick of loading the tapes manually?  Anyway the library is
refusing to
read our barcodes even though it is the exact same library we have
back at
base.  I would be very grateful if someone can shine some light?

TSM 5.1.5 (W2K)
IBM LTO 3584
8 * LTO 3580 drives
IBM tapes.

Cheers,

Mike.

Regards,
Michael Swinhoe
Storage Management Group
E-mail:   mailto:[EMAI

Re: Windows client error and TDP for Exchange question

2003-07-11 Thread Del Hoobler
Eric,

What "manual" says that the "Exchange Tracking Log is vital for
Exchange Server recovery"?  That isn't true. You do not need
the tracking logs to recover an Exchange Server.

You may still want to back those files up...
Since these files could be changing, you could change
the to copy serialization to dynamic or shared dynamic.
Or... use the new 5.2 feature to back up open/locked files.

Thanks,

Del


> Also, there is a TDP for Exchange client installed on this machine.
> According to the manual the backup of the Exchange Tracking Log is vital
for
> recovery, but TSM doesn't seem to be able to back it up:
>
> 07/10/2003 02:27:30 ANS1228E Sending of object
> '\\x1fd009\e$\EXCHSRVR\tracking.log\20030710.log' failed
> 07/10/2003 02:27:30 ANS4037E File
> '\\x1fd009\e$\EXCHSRVR\tracking.log\20030710.log' changed during
processing.
> File skipped.
>
> Is this normal behavior?


Re: SELECT equivalent for QUERY EVENT

2003-07-11 Thread Tantlevskiy,Sergey,GLENDALE,GLOBE Center AMS
Thomas,

There is no existing [SQL] table you can run SELECT from to get this data.
BUT you can map one of the hidden
tables to create new SQL table and then run your SELECT against this new
table. I'd recommend you to search ADSM-L archive
for the command to do the mapping; this is 'undocumented' one.table you
need to map is "Schedule.Event"


Sergey


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Rupp, Vorarlberger Illwerke AG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SELECT equivalent for QUERY EVENT


Hi *sm-gurus,

as our VM mainframe is soon going to die I'm rewriting all my CMS REXX
programs using REGINA and REXXSQL on Windows XP.
As I have to rewrite the code I would like to brush it up and replace
those QUERYs with SELECTs.

I was playing around (and even reading the manuals ;-) but couldn't find
a SELECT statement for the following QUERY:

QUERY EVENT * * TYPE=CLIENT Begindate=TODAY-1 BEGINTIME=19:00
EXceptionsonly=YES FORMAT=DETAILED

I would like to know what events ended with errors.
TSM Server 4.2.2.8 (I know it's far too old)

Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
Vorarlberger Illwerke AG


Re: MSCS Win2K, TSM Journal Backups and SAN attached disks!!!

2003-07-11 Thread Dave Canan
See answers below:

At 04:07 PM 7/11/2003 +0100, you wrote:
*SMers,

I understand from searching back on the list that this one might be a
bit of a hot potato, but here goes anyway:
We'd ideally like to set up TSM Journaling on a Win2K MSCS Cluster using
TSM 4.2 Client with SAN attached disk.
So, my questions are:

o) Does the TSM Journal Engine support SAN-attached disks - I
recall something about the Win32 api ReadDirectoryChangesW only
monitoring 'local' file system changes - does this preclude SAN attached
disk?
A SAN-attached disk is considered a local file system. Yes, this
would be "journalable". (Is that even a word?)
o) Would this work in an MSCS cluster?
I'm going to defer to Andy Raibeck on the official answer on this
one.Does it work? The answer I got was
that this was not supported, because the TSM Journal Service cannot be
restarted on the second
half of the cluster if a failover occurs. But if you are willing to live
with this limitation, it does work. You
can have the journal service monitor the shared resources, and it will
journal them. It just won't work in
the event of a failover. The journal will not be valid, and you will have
to resort to a "normal" incremental backup.

Has anyone done this, or tried to? Any advice?

Any help greatly received, as always!

Rgds,

David McClelland
Global Management Systems
Reuters Ltd
--- -
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging
Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Dave Canan
TSM Performance
IBM Advanced Technical Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]