Re: NOvell errors
At a guess from the Novell SAP tables, the object is an old NetWare 3.x (or earlier) server object in the tree, or an old print server/queue. If it is an old queue then print queues are marked as deny read/write IIRC, so it is as expected. It could also be a box with NCPFS running. If you get the Novell administrator to tell you exactly what that bindery object is (and whether it really still needs to be there), then you would be able to make a judgement. As bindery services started being run down almost 10 years ago, then it may be just old baggage that could be deleted from the directory. Tom On 1 Jun 2004 at 14:29, Timothy Hughes wrote: We have upgraded are TSA500, TSANDS and SMDR NLM's versions and I still see the following errors. Anyone out there with any suggestions hints? Thanks in advance Novell 5.1 SP6 TSM client 5.2.2 TSA500 - 5.05h TSANDS - 10551.44e SMDR - 6.54 DSMerror.log 05/31/2004 02:19:56 (TSA500.NLM 5.5 266) This data set is in use and cannot be accessed at this time. 05/31/2004 02:21:35 ANS1228E Sending of object 'SYS:/system/TSA/DEBUG.LOG' failed 05/31/2004 02:21:35 ANS4007E Error processing 'SYS:/system/TSA/DEBUG.LOG': access to the object is denied 05/31/2004 02:21:51 ANS1802E Incremental backup of 'SYS:' finished with 1 failure 06/01/2004 01:16:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '.[Root].O=xxx .OU=.OU=xxx.CN=Dimm\.19+Bindery Type=1115' failed 06/01/2004 01:16:29 ANS4005E Error processing '.[Root].O=.OU=.OU=xxx .CN=Dimm\.19+Bindery Type=1115': file not found 06/01/2004 01:16:37 ANS1228E Sending of object '.[Root].O=xxx .OU=.OU=xxx.CN=Dimm\.20+Bindery Type=1115' failed 06/01/2004 01:16:38 ANS4005E Error processing '.[Root].O=xx .OU=.OU=xxx.CN=Dimm\.20+Bindery Type=1115': file not found 06/01/2004 02:11:46 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '.[Root]' finished with 2 failure 06/01/2004 02:34:05 (TSA500.NLM 5.5 266) This data set is in use and cannot be accessed at this time. 06/01/2004 02:35:17 ANS1228E Sending of object 'SYS:/system/TSA/DEBUG.LOG' failed 06/01/2004 02:35:17 ANS4007E Error processing 'SYS:/system/TSA/DEBUG.LOG': access to the object is denied 06/01/2004 02:35:29 ANS1802E Incremental backup of 'SYS:' finished with 1 failure == Tom Anstey Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford University Oxford OX3 9DS UK
Re: D2D backup with TSM
Hi Jim! I know that this will involve running reclamation on the ATA storage pool but we felt using a DISK device class would waste to much storage because of fragmentation. Why did you think fragmentation was a waste of space? If a file expires, the space it allocated on a diskpool becomes free space, so it shouldn't be considered wasted. I can imagine that when a lot of little files expire, one gets a lot of fragmented free space, which could have impact on the specific disks performance in the long run. Funny to see that a lot of people (including us) are thinking about SATA storage for their backups. There doesn't seem to be anybody with real hands-on experience however... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Jim Sporer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 21:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM We are going to try disk only backups using ATA storage. We've decided to use use a FILE device class for the ATA storage pool and do the backups directly to the ATA storage pool. We will back up the data to a copy storage pool defined on a 3494 tape library. I know that this will involve running reclamation on the ATA storage pool but we felt using a DISK device class would waste to much storage because of fragmentation. Jim Sporer University of Wisconsin At 10:05 PM 5/28/2004 -0400, you wrote: We recently had a presentation from EMC. During this presentation they discussed their new DL700 virtual tape library. It got people talking about a long term strategy of moving to a all disk based backup system. So we started thinking of the pros and cons of how to go about setting up TSM for a disk based backup system. Here are some initial thought on ways to configure TSM for D2D backups. We would be very interested in your thoughts/comments. I doubt we are the only people thinking about this topic. 1)Purchase a very large disk system (ata drives?) and put storage pools on them. - use a standard DISK device pool for backups - how to reclaim space? do you even need to? - fragmentation problems? - multiple node access concurrently - use a FILE device based pool - single node access per disk file volume - need to run reclamation - still stage to disk and migrate to FILE device based pool? - use a tape copy pool for offsite and backup - use a offsite disk pool somehow - iscsi over lan or fc if close enough (enough throughput?) - other? - must use client compression to get data compressed - we mostly don't do this today 2) Purchase a virtual tape system like the DL700 (bundle of a EMC Clariion and a FalconStor vts appliance) - provides compression for data - appliance is responsible for layout and use of disk space - can copy a virtual tape to a real physical tape for offsite storage Thanks Rick ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.
Good day, below is my license information :- As you can see all is okay but it still fails to validate the license. Please help Last License Audit 2004-06-01 14:57:55.00 Number of space management clients in use 0 Number of space management clients licensed 0 Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery Manager in use ? No Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery Manager licensed ? No Number of TDP for Oracle in use 0 Number of TDP for Oracle licensed 0 Number of TDP for Oracle in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server in use 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server licensed 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange in use 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange licensed 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes in use 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes licensed 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino in use 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino licensed 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Informix in use 0 Number of TDP for Informix licensed 0 Number of TDP for Informix in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for ESS in use 0 Number of TDP for ESS licensed 0 Number of TDP for ESS in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix in use 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix licensed 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 in try buy mode 0 Is Library Sharing in use No Is Library Sharing licensed No Number of Managed System for LAN in use 6 Number of Managed System for LAN licensed 15 Number of Managed System for SAN in use 0 Number of Managed System for SAN licensed 0 Number of Managed Libraries in use 0 Number of Managed Libraries licensed 0 Tivoli Data Protection for NDMP in use ? No Tivoli Data Protection for NDMP licensed ? No Server License Compliance FAILED -Original Message- From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 June 2004 03:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Run Q LIC Look at the IN USE ver the LICENSED. Number of TDP for MS Exchange in use: 6 Number of TDP for MS Exchange licensed: 6 You will find the in use is greater then the licensed. - Bruce Kamp Senior Midrange Systems Analyst Memorial Healthcare System E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597 Pager: (954) 286-9441 Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (954) 985-1404 - -Original Message- From: Crawford, L. (Lindy) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Hi This is weird as, today while going through my actlog I discovered the same error above. All is okay with my license file but it will not validate the license. Please help... Lindy -Original Message- From: Mohamed Adan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 June 2004 01:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. You have more nodes registered than your licensed for. Run q lic to check. Mohamed Timothy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01.06.2004 13:50 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. We are getting the following message in the server activity log ANR2841W Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. the server appears to be functioning normally can anyone tell me what it means? Here is are license info ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of known computer viruses. Denne mailen er sjekket for kjente virus, uten at noen ble funnet. www.hydrotexaco.no ** This email and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information. This information is private and protected by law and, accordingly, if you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to delete this entire communication immediately and are notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of or taking any action based on this information is prohibited. Emails cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses. The
AW: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.
try an AUDIT LICENSE for recounting -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Crawford, L. (Lindy) Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Juni 2004 12:16 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Good day, below is my license information :- As you can see all is okay but it still fails to validate the license. Please help Last License Audit 2004-06-01 14:57:55.00 Number of space management clients in use 0 Number of space management clients licensed 0 Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery Manager in use ? No Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery Manager licensed ? No Number of TDP for Oracle in use 0 Number of TDP for Oracle licensed 0 Number of TDP for Oracle in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server in use 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server licensed 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange in use 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange licensed 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes in use 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes licensed 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino in use 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino licensed 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Informix in use 0 Number of TDP for Informix licensed 0 Number of TDP for Informix in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for ESS in use 0 Number of TDP for ESS licensed 0 Number of TDP for ESS in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix in use 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix licensed 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 in try buy mode 0 Is Library Sharing in use No Is Library Sharing licensed No Number of Managed System for LAN in use 6 Number of Managed System for LAN licensed 15 Number of Managed System for SAN in use 0 Number of Managed System for SAN licensed 0 Number of Managed Libraries in use 0 Number of Managed Libraries licensed 0 Tivoli Data Protection for NDMP in use ? No Tivoli Data Protection for NDMP licensed ? No Server License Compliance FAILED -Original Message- From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 June 2004 03:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Run Q LIC Look at the IN USE ver the LICENSED. Number of TDP for MS Exchange in use: 6 Number of TDP for MS Exchange licensed: 6 You will find the in use is greater then the licensed. - Bruce Kamp Senior Midrange Systems Analyst Memorial Healthcare System E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597 Pager: (954) 286-9441 Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (954) 985-1404 - -Original Message- From: Crawford, L. (Lindy) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Hi This is weird as, today while going through my actlog I discovered the same error above. All is okay with my license file but it will not validate the license. Please help... Lindy -Original Message- From: Mohamed Adan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 June 2004 01:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. You have more nodes registered than your licensed for. Run q lic to check. Mohamed Timothy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01.06.2004 13:50 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. We are getting the following message in the server activity log ANR2841W Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. the server appears to be functioning normally can anyone tell me what it means? Here is are license info ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of known computer viruses. Denne mailen er sjekket for kjente virus, uten at noen ble funnet. www.hydrotexaco.no ** This email and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information. This information is private and protected by law and, accordingly, if you are not
Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.
Hi Ive tried that so many times already... -Original Message- From: Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2004 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. try an AUDIT LICENSE for recounting -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Crawford, L. (Lindy) Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Juni 2004 12:16 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Good day, below is my license information :- As you can see all is okay but it still fails to validate the license. Please help Last License Audit 2004-06-01 14:57:55.00 Number of space management clients in use 0 Number of space management clients licensed 0 Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery Manager in use ? No Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery Manager licensed ? No Number of TDP for Oracle in use 0 Number of TDP for Oracle licensed 0 Number of TDP for Oracle in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server in use 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server licensed 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange in use 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange licensed 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes in use 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes licensed 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino in use 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino licensed 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Informix in use 0 Number of TDP for Informix licensed 0 Number of TDP for Informix in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for ESS in use 0 Number of TDP for ESS licensed 0 Number of TDP for ESS in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix in use 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix licensed 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 in try buy mode 0 Is Library Sharing in use No Is Library Sharing licensed No Number of Managed System for LAN in use 6 Number of Managed System for LAN licensed 15 Number of Managed System for SAN in use 0 Number of Managed System for SAN licensed 0 Number of Managed Libraries in use 0 Number of Managed Libraries licensed 0 Tivoli Data Protection for NDMP in use ? No Tivoli Data Protection for NDMP licensed ? No Server License Compliance FAILED -Original Message- From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 June 2004 03:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Run Q LIC Look at the IN USE ver the LICENSED. Number of TDP for MS Exchange in use: 6 Number of TDP for MS Exchange licensed: 6 You will find the in use is greater then the licensed. - Bruce Kamp Senior Midrange Systems Analyst Memorial Healthcare System E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597 Pager: (954) 286-9441 Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (954) 985-1404 - -Original Message- From: Crawford, L. (Lindy) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Hi This is weird as, today while going through my actlog I discovered the same error above. All is okay with my license file but it will not validate the license. Please help... Lindy -Original Message- From: Mohamed Adan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 June 2004 01:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. You have more nodes registered than your licensed for. Run q lic to check. Mohamed Timothy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01.06.2004 13:50 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. We are getting the following message in the server activity log ANR2841W Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. the server appears to be functioning normally can anyone tell me what it means? Here is are license info ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of known computer viruses. Denne mailen er sjekket for kjente virus, uten at noen ble funnet. www.hydrotexaco.no
Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.
I suggest that you read the actlog from your last startup. TSM loads the licences and explains if there is a problem. You may need to re-copy the licence files and adsmlicn.dll(Windows) from the multi-coloured installation CD for your server current version. If that doesn't fix it, run the original licence setup again. Rgds Tony -Original Message- From: Crawford, L. (Lindy) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2004 11:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Hi Ive tried that so many times already... -Original Message- From: Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 June 2004 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. try an AUDIT LICENSE for recounting -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Crawford, L. (Lindy) Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Juni 2004 12:16 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Good day, below is my license information :- As you can see all is okay but it still fails to validate the license. Please help Last License Audit 2004-06-01 14:57:55.00 Number of space management clients in use 0 Number of space management clients licensed 0 Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery Manager in use ? No Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery Manager licensed ? No Number of TDP for Oracle in use 0 Number of TDP for Oracle licensed 0 Number of TDP for Oracle in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server in use 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server licensed 0 Number of TDP for MS SQL Server in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange in use 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange licensed 0 Number of TDP for MS Exchange in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes in use 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes licensed 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Notes in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino in use 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino licensed 0 Number of TDP for Lotus Domino in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for Informix in use 0 Number of TDP for Informix licensed 0 Number of TDP for Informix in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for SAP R/3 in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for ESS in use 0 Number of TDP for ESS licensed 0 Number of TDP for ESS in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for ESS R/3 in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix in use 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix licensed 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix in try buy mode 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 in use 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 licensed 0 Number of TDP for EMC Symmetrix R/3 in try buy mode 0 Is Library Sharing in use No Is Library Sharing licensed No Number of Managed System for LAN in use 6 Number of Managed System for LAN licensed 15 Number of Managed System for SAN in use 0 Number of Managed System for SAN licensed 0 Number of Managed Libraries in use 0 Number of Managed Libraries licensed 0 Tivoli Data Protection for NDMP in use ? No Tivoli Data Protection for NDMP licensed ? No Server License Compliance FAILED -Original Message- From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 June 2004 03:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Run Q LIC Look at the IN USE ver the LICENSED. Number of TDP for MS Exchange in use: 6 Number of TDP for MS Exchange licensed: 6 You will find the in use is greater then the licensed. - Bruce Kamp Senior Midrange Systems Analyst Memorial Healthcare System E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597 Pager: (954) 286-9441 Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (954) 985-1404 - -Original Message- From: Crawford, L. (Lindy) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. Hi This is weird as, today while going through my actlog I discovered the same error above. All is okay with my license file but it will not validate the license. Please help... Lindy -Original Message- From: Mohamed Adan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 June 2004 01:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms. You have more nodes registered than your licensed for. Run q lic to check. Mohamed Timothy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01.06.2004 13:50 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.
Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.
Have you done a search on that error number at the IBM site? A possible cause is the computer's clock being wrong. Richard Sims
Schedule 3rd day of every month
Hello everyone! I was just wondering if anyone would happen to know how to create an admin schedule that will archive a specific servers f:\archive filesystem on the third day of every month for 365 days? I know that I will need an MC of 365 for an archive copy group, but how is it possible to schedule it for the 3rd? Thanks in advance!!! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: D2D backup with TSM
Yes . . . exactly. From reading about the EMC DL700, it truly emuilates tape libraries, tape drives and tape cartridges. Actually, it can concurrently emulate multiple libraries (of the same kind of different kinds), different kinds of tape drives (lto, dlt, etc), with emulated tape cartridges. You would have to run reclamation on the emulated tape cartridges just like a real tape system. You could set it up and one big library and use tsm tape drive sharing to share the virtual library/drives between several tsm instances, or, give each tsm instance their own virtual library. Rick Hart, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TRONIC.COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 06/01/2004 05:06 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager May be a dumb question but here it goes Using a D2D backup to a Virtual Tape System does the backup application (TSM or Netbackup - We have both...) create a Volume Name for each Virtual tape? (IE TSM Server to server virtual volumes are assigned a volume name) If so could you end up partially filled VT Volumes and hopefully you can run a reclaim if using TSM, if not TSM you just have wasted Disk? Hope that all made sense -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Sporer Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 2:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM We are going to try disk only backups using ATA storage. We've decided to use use a FILE device class for the ATA storage pool and do the backups directly to the ATA storage pool. We will back up the data to a copy storage pool defined on a 3494 tape library. I know that this will involve running reclamation on the ATA storage pool but we felt using a DISK device class would waste to much storage because of fragmentation. Jim Sporer University of Wisconsin At 10:05 PM 5/28/2004 -0400, you wrote: We recently had a presentation from EMC. During this presentation they discussed their new DL700 virtual tape library. It got people talking about a long term strategy of moving to a all disk based backup system. So we started thinking of the pros and cons of how to go about setting up TSM for a disk based backup system. Here are some initial thought on ways to configure TSM for D2D backups. We would be very interested in your thoughts/comments. I doubt we are the only people thinking about this topic. 1)Purchase a very large disk system (ata drives?) and put storage pools on them. - use a standard DISK device pool for backups - how to reclaim space? do you even need to? - fragmentation problems? - multiple node access concurrently - use a FILE device based pool - single node access per disk file volume - need to run reclamation - still stage to disk and migrate to FILE device based pool? - use a tape copy pool for offsite and backup - use a offsite disk pool somehow - iscsi over lan or fc if close enough (enough throughput?) - other? - must use client compression to get data compressed - we mostly don't do this today 2) Purchase a virtual tape system like the DL700 (bundle of a EMC Clariion and a FalconStor vts appliance) - provides compression for data - appliance is responsible for layout and use of disk space - can copy a virtual tape to a real physical tape for offsite storage Thanks Rick
Re: D2D backup with TSM
Why did you think fragmentation was a waste of space? If a file expires, the space it allocated on a diskpool becomes free space, so it shouldn't be considered wasted. Just how does a disk pool handle storage? I know TSM tracks every file, but is storage handles per file? For example . . . aggregrates - bunches of small files that TSM handles as one big file. To get back the space from expired files in a aggregrate requires runing a reclamation on the tape/data. A move data cmd only copies an aggregrate whole - expired files and all. When would an aggregrate be reclamed when using a DISK device pool? Rick Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: M.COM Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 06/02/2004 05:14 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi Jim! I know that this will involve running reclamation on the ATA storage pool but we felt using a DISK device class would waste to much storage because of fragmentation. Why did you think fragmentation was a waste of space? If a file expires, the space it allocated on a diskpool becomes free space, so it shouldn't be considered wasted. I can imagine that when a lot of little files expire, one gets a lot of fragmented free space, which could have impact on the specific disks performance in the long run. Funny to see that a lot of people (including us) are thinking about SATA storage for their backups. There doesn't seem to be anybody with real hands-on experience however... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Jim Sporer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 21:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM We are going to try disk only backups using ATA storage. We've decided to use use a FILE device class for the ATA storage pool and do the backups directly to the ATA storage pool. We will back up the data to a copy storage pool defined on a 3494 tape library. I know that this will involve running reclamation on the ATA storage pool but we felt using a DISK device class would waste to much storage because of fragmentation. Jim Sporer University of Wisconsin At 10:05 PM 5/28/2004 -0400, you wrote: We recently had a presentation from EMC. During this presentation they discussed their new DL700 virtual tape library. It got people talking about a long term strategy of moving to a all disk based backup system. So we started thinking of the pros and cons of how to go about setting up TSM for a disk based backup system. Here are some initial thought on ways to configure TSM for D2D backups. We would be very interested in your thoughts/comments. I doubt we are the only people thinking about this topic. 1)Purchase a very large disk system (ata drives?) and put storage pools on them. - use a standard DISK device pool for backups - how to reclaim space? do you even need to? - fragmentation problems? - multiple node access concurrently - use a FILE device based pool - single node access per disk file volume - need to run reclamation - still stage to disk and migrate to FILE device based pool? - use a tape copy pool for offsite and backup - use a offsite disk pool somehow - iscsi over lan or fc if close enough (enough throughput?) - other? - must use client compression to get data compressed - we mostly don't do this today 2) Purchase a virtual tape system like the DL700 (bundle of a EMC Clariion and a FalconStor vts appliance) - provides compression for data - appliance is responsible for layout and use of disk space - can copy a virtual tape to a real physical tape for offsite storage Thanks Rick ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any
Re: Schedule 3rd day of every month
How about scheduling a script with the following code on daily basis. The 3rd every month it will create a onetime-schedule for archiving. Just make sure the syntax for define and delete schedule and association is correct. SELECT DAY(CURRENT_DATE) FROM SYSCAT.TABLES WHERE DAY(CURRENT_DATE)=3 /*can be any table which isn't empty*/ IF (RC_NOTFOUND) GOTO RETRY DEFINE SCHEDULE [YOUR_DOMAINNAME] ARCHIVE_ON_3RD TYPE=CLIENT ACTION=ARCHIVE STARTTIME=NOW+0:30 PERUNITS=ONETIME DEFINE ASSOCIATION [YOUR_DOMAINNAME] ARCHIVE_ON_3RD [YOUR_NODENAME] EXIT RETRY: DELETE SCHEDULE [YOUR_DOMAINNAME] ARCHIVE_ON_3RD EXIT --- Anders Pontusson Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6b 183 62 Täby Mobile: +46 70 - 399 32 90 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Joni Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-02 13:50 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Schedule 3rd day of every month Hello everyone! I was just wondering if anyone would happen to know how to create an admin schedule that will archive a specific servers f:\archive filesystem on the third day of every month for 365 days? I know that I will need an MC of 365 for an archive copy group, but how is it possible to schedule it for the 3rd? Thanks in advance!!! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
multiple schedules?
It seems like my current TSM setup has servers grouped into like processing (or similiar) categories for backup scheduling. Is there any benefit in keeping the groups currently in place, but adding a schedule per server and maybe a schedule per platform? Creating a matrix of schedules instead of simple, linear groups. The only advantage I can think of being able to schedule or force a backup of a server *now* without requiring all servers in that same group to backup. Mike
3583 scripting from windows
I have a 3583 library that I use with TSM from AIX to do informix backups - which take about three hours a day. I have it hooked up to a windows box which is not running TSM server or client. From within AIX I can script certain things using tapeutil - is there any such beast which can be used from within windows (w2k) to automate moving of tapes about within the library? Ie `tapeutil -f /dev/smc0 move 16 256` Thanks Ted Fiedler
Re: multiple schedules?
The only advantage I can think of being able to schedule or force a backup of a server *now* without requiring all servers in that same group to backup. Mike For this, you can use DEFine CLIENTAction. We have even set this up as a script, so we can pass the nodename or comma-separated list of nodenames: run test_w_client NodeX run test_u_client NodeX,NodeY,NodeZ I would avoid the matrix approach, if possible - maintenance could become a real headache... -Ted
Re: Separating Windows System Object Backup from the File system Backups
You could always add the DSM_* environemtn variables to the client node. DSM_DIR= DSM_CONFIG= and add the DSM_DIR to the PATH variable. There is a section in the Windows B/A client manual titles Setting environment variables that describe these. One of the reasons listed is: 1. You want to invoke Tivoli Storage Manager from a directory other than the directory where Tivoli Storage Manager is installed. If you set these variables for the System-level you can then use the original command DSMC BACKUP ... wihtout having to code up a .BAT file which CD's to the directory. Cuts out some steps, but works just the same. Bill Boyer Life is not about how fast you run, or how high you climb but how well you bounce. - ?? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hart, Charles Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Separating Windows System Object Backup from the File system Backups Fantastic! That worked just Great! Makes sense as the TSM Server Scheduler contacts the TSM Client API which should know what Dir its in... Dahhh! Thanks ! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rushforth, Tim Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Separating Windows System Object Backup from the File system Backups We've done similar things in the past (registry backups, event log backups) without specifying a path at all on the schedule. Have you tried just dsmc backup systemobject for the objects? -Original Message- From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 1, 2004 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Separating Windows System Object Backup from the File system Backups We've been having issues with the log being pinned by Win2k Sysobj's The Tivoli tech support had me create two schedules (One for File system only and one set of Scheds for Sysobj.) If anyone has any ideas that would be great! We want to do this from the server side as we have hundreds of Intel rabbits. File System Only Sched - Which Works fine define schedule domainname schedulename action=incremental options=-domain='-systemobject' Win2k SysObj Sched - Can not get to work our path is slightly different (IE c:\program fiule etc) define schedule domainname schedulename action=commandobjects='c:\tsm\baclient\dsmc backup systemobject' Our Sysob Sched Detail Policy Domain Name: INTEL Schedule Name: INTEL_SYSOBJ Description: Action: Command Options: Objects: C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmc backup systemobject Priority: 5 Start Date/Time: 06/01/04 15:20:00 Duration: 1 Hour(s) Period: 1 Day(s) Day of Week: Any Detail from dsmsched log... 2004-06-01 15:20:03 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 2004-06-01 15:20:03 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Next operation scheduled: 2004-06-01 15:20:03 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Schedule Name: INTEL_SYSOBJ 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Action:Command 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Objects: C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmc backup systemobject 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Options: 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Server Window Start: 15:20:00 on 2004-06-01 2004-06-01 15:20:03 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Executing scheduled command now. 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Executing Operating System command or script: C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmc backup systemobject 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Finished command. Return code is: 1 2004-06-01 15:20:03 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. 2004-06-01 15:20:03 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'INTEL_SYSOBJ' failed. Return code = 1. 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Sending results for scheduled event 'INTEL_SYSOBJ'. 2004-06-01 15:20:03 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'INTEL_SYSOBJ'. DSMERROR Log 2004-06-01 15:20:03 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. 2004-06-01 15:20:03 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'INTEL_SYSOBJ' failed. Return code = 1. TSM Env Server AIX 5.2.2 TSM 5.2.4 Client WIn2k TSM Client 5.2.2 Thank You!
Help with clientoptions and exclude
Client v5.2.1 os win2000, server v5.1.9.0 on solaris 2.8. Help out there. Below is the error message I am recieving, as well as the client option definition. Can't seem to get this file excluded. THanks for the help, message and definitions follow. ANE4987E (Session: 887, Node: ARTHUR) Error processing '\\arthur\c$\WINNT\system32\Perflib_Perfdata_4d0.dat': the object is in use by another process cloptset definitions follow def cloptset arthurtest desc=test for node arthur def clientopt arthurtest DOMAIN -systemobject seq=1 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL exclude *:...\pagefile.sys seq=2 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude *:\WINNT\system32\config\default* Seq=3 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude *:\WINNT\system32\config\sam* Seq=4 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude *:\WINNT\system32\config\security* Seq=5 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude *:\WINNT\system32\config\software* seq=8 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude *:\WINNT\system32\config\system seq=10 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude *:\WINNT\system32\config\system.alt seq=12 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude *:\winnt\temp\...\* seq=14 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL exclude *:\WINNT\system32\Perflib_*.dat seq=16 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Include *:\adsm.sys\...\* seq=18 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude.dir '*:\...\Temporary Internet Files' seq=20 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude.dir *:\Recycled seq=22 def clientopt arthurtest INCLEXCL Exclude.dir *:\Recycler seq=24 Gary Lee Senior Operating Systems Analyst Ball State University phone 765-285-1310
Re: D2D backup with TSM
I think if you defined some reasonable size of serial storage pools even on disk, that this would cut the fragmentation and still make it usable. I wonder how fragmentation is handled if you use TSM to manage the disks as RAW instead of cooked with a file system on them? (Andy, any input?) -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 4:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM Hi Jim! I know that this will involve running reclamation on the ATA storage pool but we felt using a DISK device class would waste to much storage because of fragmentation. Why did you think fragmentation was a waste of space? If a file expires, the space it allocated on a diskpool becomes free space, so it shouldn't be considered wasted. I can imagine that when a lot of little files expire, one gets a lot of fragmented free space, which could have impact on the specific disks performance in the long run. Funny to see that a lot of people (including us) are thinking about SATA storage for their backups. There doesn't seem to be anybody with real hands-on experience however... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Jim Sporer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 21:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM We are going to try disk only backups using ATA storage. We've decided to use use a FILE device class for the ATA storage pool and do the backups directly to the ATA storage pool. We will back up the data to a copy storage pool defined on a 3494 tape library. I know that this will involve running reclamation on the ATA storage pool but we felt using a DISK device class would waste to much storage because of fragmentation. Jim Sporer University of Wisconsin At 10:05 PM 5/28/2004 -0400, you wrote: We recently had a presentation from EMC. During this presentation they discussed their new DL700 virtual tape library. It got people talking about a long term strategy of moving to a all disk based backup system. So we started thinking of the pros and cons of how to go about setting up TSM for a disk based backup system. Here are some initial thought on ways to configure TSM for D2D backups. We would be very interested in your thoughts/comments. I doubt we are the only people thinking about this topic. 1)Purchase a very large disk system (ata drives?) and put storage pools on them. - use a standard DISK device pool for backups - how to reclaim space? do you even need to? - fragmentation problems? - multiple node access concurrently - use a FILE device based pool - single node access per disk file volume - need to run reclamation - still stage to disk and migrate to FILE device based pool? - use a tape copy pool for offsite and backup - use a offsite disk pool somehow - iscsi over lan or fc if close enough (enough throughput?) - other? - must use client compression to get data compressed - we mostly don't do this today 2) Purchase a virtual tape system like the DL700 (bundle of a EMC Clariion and a FalconStor vts appliance) - provides compression for data - appliance is responsible for layout and use of disk space - can copy a virtual tape to a real physical tape for offsite storage Thanks Rick ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: Help with clientoptions and exclude
At 09:00 AM 6/2/2004, you wrote: Client v5.2.1 os win2000, server v5.1.9.0 on solaris 2.8. Help out there. Below is the error message I am recieving, as well as the client option definition. Can't seem to get this file excluded. A little more information would be very useful - what does Query INCLEXCL on the client show?
SET ACCESS
Senario: We are moving an application from one AIX server to another. The 1st AIX server had archived files. I did a set access to allow the 2nd AIX server to retrieved files archived by the 1st AIX server. Now, I intend to retain the client definition of the 1st AIX server to allow access to the archived files, but plan on removing the actual server. Question: Once set, are the set access permissions stored on the TSM server so the absence of the 1st AIX server will not inhibit retrieving files it archived?
Re: SET ACCESS
The physical client machine need not be present in order to access its files from another machine. Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/02/2004 06:39:10: Senario: We are moving an application from one AIX server to another. The 1st AIX server had archived files. I did a set access to allow the 2nd AIX server to retrieved files archived by the 1st AIX server. Now, I intend to retain the client definition of the 1st AIX server to allow access to the archived files, but plan on removing the actual server. Question: Once set, are the set access permissions stored on the TSM server so the absence of the 1st AIX server will not inhibit retrieving files it archived?
Re: Cristie BMR solution and TSM
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Muhammad Sadat I have first client requiring BMR on Windows. I know that cristie BMR is integrated with Tivoli. I have a question since I have not yet tested it out: 1- While backups have been taken by Tivoli server, and BMR media created by Cristie my understanding is as under: Cristie created media be that CD or floppy will initiate the restore process. Once temporary OS is installed , the media will contact the TSM server and start restore of data and OS files Which means all the control is in the hands of Cristie to let TSM Server know what to do. QUESTION: While it is integrated with TSM, how would we go about with the interface, the GUI in TSM. Would there be some server side component added for interfacing or is it inherent? This is a question better aimed at Christie support. -- Mark Stapleton
Re: D2D backup with TSM
When would an aggregrate be reclamed when using a DISK device pool? Rick Once again check out http://ew.share.org/callpapers/attach/Long_Beach_Conference/S5725a.pdf There is a table that compares Disk Pools (Random Access) to Seq File Disk pools. The answer is aggregrate reconstruction is not supported on disk pools.
SV: Cristie BMR solution and TSM
Hey! What CBMR does is create there own system backup of each servers. In that backup CBMR is only backing up Boot files, OS and the ITSM Client and this backup is taking each weekend or every time a major system change have been made. Your ITSM Client is still backing up everything each day. When you server has crash you boot up on a general CD from Cristie and let CBMR partition, format your hard disk and it's also going to restore the backup that CBMR have done during the weekend of your Windows box. When that is done CBMR is going to start your ITSM Client so you can do a point in time restore of your system. When the ITSM client have restore everything in point in time you reboot your Windows box and it's up and running and it's look exact the same since the backup have been made. If you have any questions please take contact with Cristie Tech support at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or talk to your IBM Reseller. Med vdnlig hdlsning / Best Regards Christian Svensson Senior Software Engineer Cristie Data Products Office : +44-1453-84 7000 US Tech Support : 1-866-TEC-CBMR Cell : +46-70-325 15 77 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - WebMail fren Tele2 http://www.tele2.se -
TCPWindowsSize
HI, what is the default TCPwindowsize to AIX, HP , Solaris and Linux in the TSM client? What is the value recommended? thank you Janeth
Re: TCPWindowsSize
Hi the range of values in kulobytes is 1 through 2048. For solaris the maximum is 1024. the default value is 32. To improve backup and archive operation increase this parameter on server. To improve restore and retreive operation, increase it on client Regards -Message d'origine- De : Lopez Janeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 2 juin 2004 14:48 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : TCPWindowsSize HI, what is the default TCPwindowsize to AIX, HP , Solaris and Linux in the TSM client? What is the value recommended? thank you Janeth === Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le message) sont confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration. La SOCIETE GENERALE et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au titre de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. === This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. ===
Re: TCPWindowsSize
what is the default TCPwindowsize to AIX, HP , Solaris and Linux in the TSM client? What is the value recommended? Janeth - The TSM Performance Tuning Guide talks about that parameter. See http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/IBMStorageManagerMessages5.2.2.html Richard Sims
Re: D2D backup with TSM
I was under the impression that performing a move data xx reconstruct=y would reconstruct the aggregate, thus effectively performing reclamation on a disk type volume. Probably not what the TSM developers intended it for, but it might be just the ticket for those moving to disk-only infrastructures (and not wanting to use file based volumes). Steve Schaub Systems Engineer, Operations Storage Haworth, Inc 616-393-1457 (desk) 616-886-8821 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM When would an aggregrate be reclamed when using a DISK device pool? Rick Once again check out http://ew.share.org/callpapers/attach/Long_Beach_Conference/S5725a.pdf There is a table that compares Disk Pools (Random Access) to Seq File Disk pools. The answer is aggregrate reconstruction is not supported on disk pools.
Re: D2D backup with TSM
That can only be done on a sequential access pool. If you try on a storagepool of device type disk you will get: ANR1718E MOVE DATA: Reconstruction of file aggregates is supported only for movement in which the source and target storage pools are sequential-access. ANS8001I Return code 3. -Original Message- From: Steve Schaub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 2, 2004 11:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM I was under the impression that performing a move data xx reconstruct=y would reconstruct the aggregate, thus effectively performing reclamation on a disk type volume. Probably not what the TSM developers intended it for, but it might be just the ticket for those moving to disk-only infrastructures (and not wanting to use file based volumes). Steve Schaub Systems Engineer, Operations Storage Haworth, Inc 616-393-1457 (desk) 616-886-8821 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: D2D backup with TSM When would an aggregrate be reclamed when using a DISK device pool? Rick Once again check out http://ew.share.org/callpapers/attach/Long_Beach_Conference/S5725a.pdf There is a table that compares Disk Pools (Random Access) to Seq File Disk pools. The answer is aggregrate reconstruction is not supported on disk pools.
Re: D2D backup with TSM
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Rhodes Since I have experienced disk subsystem crashes with loss data, I couldn't ever use just one disk system. I think I'd have to have separate disk systems for the primary pools and copy pools (or tape), and maybe even a third subsystem for the db and staging pools. You want to avoid all single points of failure when possible. However, I'd be inclined to keep the db and log volumes on local disk (controller-mirrored, of course. It's hard to beat disk access speeds from the local bus if you buy the right controller and disk.) A couple of 72GB local disks (mirrored) gives plenty of room for the OS and the TSM db volumes and TSM log volume copies, and a third 72GB local disk for the OS's swap/paging space, the TSM log volumes, and TSM db volume copies. I've been called paranoid . . . but it comes from experience. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you. -- Mark Stapleton
Re: D2D backup with TSM
However, I'd be inclined to keep the db and log volumes on local disk (controller-mirrored, of course. It's hard to beat disk access speeds from the local bus if you buy the right controller and disk.) A couple of 72GB local disks (mirrored) gives plenty of room for the OS and the TSM db volumes and TSM log volume copies, and a third 72GB local disk for the OS's swap/paging space, the TSM log volumes, and TSM db volume copies. Don't you need the db and log volumes off site too? Sal Mangiapane
Delete Offsite Copy Storage Pool
I'm running TSM 5.1.7.0 server on ZOS.The clients are Novell, Windows and AIX (around 400 total). Backups are to mainframe DASD. The primary onsite tape pool is an STK VTS. Backups are collocated by filespace, and we keep 3 versions of active files. Our copy storage pool is stored offsite, and filespaces are not collocated. Our disaster administrator asked if we could do away with the offsite copy storage pool.They would duplex the VTS's backend 9840 tapes and send those offsite, eliminating the need for TSM's copy--storage-pool processing. Has anyone done this before or have any thoughts on that? The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
3583 door locked
I have a 3583 with a 12 slot I/O door on the front. The I/O door is always locked, so it's pretty much unusable. Even when doing checkin or label search=bulk, and TSM says to fill the Bulk I/O with tapes, the door stays locked. The little lock icon on the LCD is always lit. Any ideas here? I'd really like to use the I/O door...otherwise i have to use the main door, and it takes quite a while to Scan/Learn all 5 columns each time. thanks... ray -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ray DeJean http://www.r-a-y.org Systems EngineerSoutheastern Louisiana University IBM Certified Specialist AIX Administration, AIX Support =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Re: 3583 door locked
At 03:41 PM 6/2/2004, you wrote: Any ideas here? I'd really like to use the I/O door...otherwise i have to use the main door, and it takes quite a while to Scan/Learn all 5 columns each time. thanks... Your library's I/O station is configured as Storage Slots; you should have it configured as Import/Export. Reference the Setup and Operator Guide for the 3583. (It's on page 178 in the version of the manual that I have.) -Ted
Change to location of metabase.bin
TSM B/A client 5.2.0.3 Client: Windows 2000 Server We have some IIS servers where Microsoft is recommending to change the location of metabase.bin from c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv to a new subdirectory located at c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv\metabase (see basics of changes below) I just want to get some feedback on what the group thinks if there will be any problems with doing disaster recoveries with these servers. The assumption is since IIS (and Windows) knows about the changed location, when the file is restored back to that location, there should be no problems with IIS on the recovery. Looking at dsmsched.log pre and post move, the file gets backed up, but since it is a Windows system file too, I am just wondering how TSM will handle it. Thoughts? Thanks in advance, Matt Changes wanted: Change Description: Move the IIS metabase.bin file from c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv to a new subdirectory located at c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv\metabase and have this new subdirectory excluded from the NAV realtime scan. Reason For Change: Microsoft has identified this as a culprit to the intermittent resource is currently in use error. During business hours, the IIS metabase.bin file changes approximately every 3 minutes. Since it is a .bin file and is in the c:\winnt\system32 directory structure, the NAV scans (and locks it) each time it changes. This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
Re: Change to location of metabase.bin
In reading the Q article regarding this, it looks like a registry entry is changed as well to point IIS to this new location. Which hopefully gives TSM the help it needs during a disaster recovery.. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321142Product=i is50 _ From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 3:23 PM To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager' Subject: Change to location of metabase.bin TSM B/A client 5.2.0.3 Client: Windows 2000 Server We have some IIS servers where Microsoft is recommending to change the location of metabase.bin from c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv to a new subdirectory located at c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv\metabase (see basics of changes below) I just want to get some feedback on what the group thinks if there will be any problems with doing disaster recoveries with these servers. The assumption is since IIS (and Windows) knows about the changed location, when the file is restored back to that location, there should be no problems with IIS on the recovery. Looking at dsmsched.log pre and post move, the file gets backed up, but since it is a Windows system file too, I am just wondering how TSM will handle it. Thoughts? Thanks in advance, Matt Changes wanted: Change Description: Move the IIS metabase.bin file from c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv to a new subdirectory located at c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv\metabase and have this new subdirectory excluded from the NAV realtime scan. Reason For Change: Microsoft has identified this as a culprit to the intermittent resource is currently in use error. During business hours, the IIS metabase.bin file changes approximately every 3 minutes. Since it is a .bin file and is in the c:\winnt\system32 directory structure, the NAV scans (and locks it) each time it changes. This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
Re: Problems with 2K3 server backups
Mike, When we get these messages in dsmerror.log: 06/02/2004 01:07:45 ANS1950E Backup via Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy failed. See error log for more detail. What error log is the message referring to? Thanks! -Original Message- From: Mike Dile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems with 2K3 server backups WMI does exist on Windows 2003. It is part of system state. You can use the command vssadmin list writers to show you a list of the services that reside on Windows 2003 which may participate in system state or system service backup. The VSS_E_WRITER_INFRASTRUCTURE is a possible indication that the Windows 2003 Volume Shadow Copy Service is not running or is an error state. The VSS_WS_FAILED_AT_FREEZE is an indication that the WMI service is in such a state that it vetoed the request by TSM to create a shadow copy from which system state backup could be obtained. I would check the status of the Windows Instrumentation Service in the service control panel to insure that it was running (and that the service startup was set to its default-Automatic). I would also examine the Windows event log to see if there are any WMI-related messages there. The vssadmin list writers command can give you an indication of the status of VSS on your system. Regards, Mike Dile Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Tivoli Software, IBM Software Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3583 door locked
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Ted Byrne wrote: Your library's I/O station is configured as Storage Slots; you should have it configured as Import/Export. Reference the Setup and Operator Guide for the 3583. (It's on page 178 in the version of the manual that I have.) The I/O station is already setup as Import/Export. The icon changes when it's setup as storage, i verified from the panel that it's setup as Impt/Expt. Any other ideas? ray
Re: Error backing up eDir 8.7.3
Hi Joel, NETDB.nlm was already loaded when I checked. I have also tried reloading the modules (SMDR, TSANDS, TSAFS ...) but to no avail. I have looked in the archives of the list but only found something refering to an older NW install and an older TSM client. I was wondering if people running older versions of the eDir (like 7.x) are have a similar problem. This would help me eliminate the version of eDir as being the issue. Thanks all, Curt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/31/2004 6:14:59 am I believe NETDB.NLM needs to be loaded manually before the TSA's, or at least before the DSMC*. But you would not be able to backup regular files either if this was not loaded, I think Just a shot in the dark Joel Lovelien [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/28/2004 4:37:06 PM Hi all, I've run into some issues while trying to back up a test box loaded with NW 6.5 running eDir 8.7.3. All I get are errors everytime I try to do either a scheduled or manual backup of the NDS. Current setup is: TSM Server v5.2.1.2 TSM Client for NW v5.2.2.9 (Mar 18th 04) NW v6.5 eDir v8.7.3 TSANDS.nlm v10551.61 SMDR.nlm v6.54 (Dec 1st 03) Using both TSAFS.nlm v6.50.06 (Dec 4th 03) TSA600.nlm v6.00.08 (Sep 11 03) The error that I'm coming across in the DSMERROR.LOG is: ANS1876E Unable to connect to target service. Netware SMS return code = . Not too sure where to look from here. Has anyone come acrosss this before? Thanks Curt ___ Curt Watts Network Analyst, Capilano College [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with 2K3 server backups
ANS1950E should refer to the Windows event log as another source for information regarding the failure. There still may be other messages in dsmerror.log itself that are germane. Regards, Mike Dile Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Tivoli Software, IBM Software Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TSM extended edition question.
Wow I didn't know that, good thing I found out now and not later. I can assume upgrading from TSM v4.2 to TSMee v5.2 is no different to upgrading to standard TSM v5.2? Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] A.NETTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: TSM extended edition question. EDU 02/06/2004 04:50 AM Please respond to ADSM-L I checked that link out. From that page (just above the table of devices): For IBM Tivoli Storage Manager version 5.1 and later, to use a library with greater than 3 drives or greater than 40 storage slots, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Extended Edition is required. -- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
Re: Cristie BMR solution and TSM
Mark, I don't understand why you waste the time to tell people to go somewhere else for information. If you don't know, save yourself the time and don't respond. Sadi, If you go to Cristie's website (http://www.cristie.co.uk) you can download not only a trial version but also a pdf that walks you through the process. This will probably even give you a better idea of the interfaces than what I am going to give you. Here is a brief overview: 1) Cristie has a GUI that you use to configure a backup of the C:\ and systemstate. By default it only backs up the files on the C:\ required to restore the operating system. I suggest you backup the entire C:\ with Cristie as it will make the restore more strait forward. It is important to run the Cristie backup as often as the OS changes. You can schedule it. 2) You also use the GUI to backup the system's hardware configuration. You can choose to back this up to a floppy or a network share or both. 3) You then use TSM to backup everything else. You can if you want have TSM backup the systemstate and C:\ as well, it won't hurt the process. 4) At restore time you need to have access to the server's hardware config, either from the floppy or the network share. 5) Cristie gives you an ISO that you will burn which is a bootable Linux CD running TSM V3.1.0.6 (or maybe a newer version now). 6) You boot off of the Linux CD and run through a text based menu. You have to pick options to load your disk config and network config. 7) You then use a menu option to point to the location that has the hardware config (floppy or network). 8) You then pick a menu option that starts the restore. It contacts the TSM server and starts a restore of everything that was backed up via Cristie. This restore is done to a FAT (or FAT32 I can't remember which) partition. 9) When the restore completes it boots to windows. A pop up comes up letting you know that Cristie set the flag to convert the OS from FAT to NTFS and that another reboot is required. 10) After the next reboot the system is back up and you can now restore the rest of the drives using the TSM GUI. This process saves you the time of having to install windows before you restore the sytem which can be anywhere from 30 minutes to 1 hour. The latest version of Cristie is supposed to support a DR to dissimilar hardware but I have not had a chance to test that yet. This could save you even more time. Muhammad Sadat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All, I have first client requiring BMR on Windows. I know that cristie BMR is integrated with Tivoli. I have a question since I have not yet tested it out: 1- While backups have been taken by Tivoli server, and BMR media created by Cristie my understanding is as under: Cristie created media be that CD or floppy will initiate the restore process. Once temporary OS is installed , the media will contact the TSM server and start restore of data and OS files Which means all the control is in the hands of Cristie to let TSM Server know what to do. QUESTION: While it is integrated with TSM, how would we go about with the interface, the GUI in TSM. Would there be some server side component added for interfacing or is it inherent? Please clear my misconceptions if any !!! Cheers! Sadi - Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
Re: 3583 door locked
The I/O station is already setup as Import/Export. The icon changes when it's setup as storage, i verified from the panel that it's setup as Impt/Expt. Any other ideas? My apologies - I thought from the reference to the lock icon in your original email that the padlock icon was showing as locked. This could be a hardware problem; one of my co-workers mentioned that we had a customer with at similar problem. IBM wound up working on the library. I'm not sure what was done to correct the problem. Ted
Systemstate
Hi to all I have 2 Domain Controller on a Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition with on each of them install Tivoli client 5.2.2.9. The backup of the systemstate on one of them run perfectly but on the second one got this message error: ANS4005E error processing SYSTEM STATE file not found The dsm.opt is exactly the same for both of them: TCPSERVERADDRESS post.haifa.ac.il nodename HAIFADC01 PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE SCHEDMODE prompted SCHEDLOGR 10 D ERRORLOGR 10 D TXNBYTELIMIT 25600 DOMAIN systemstate EXCLUDE ?:\...\* EXCLUDE.dir c:\...\* INCLUDE.SYSTEMSTATE ALL mgwin Any idea why ?? Regards Ouzen Robert E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
