System Error
Hi to all When running a backup on Netware client version 6.05 with TSM client version 5.1.6.0 I got this error message . I know then Outlook must be closed to prevent this error on the pst file but why the backup didn't continue Any way to conturn this problem .. My copy serialization is on Dynamic 01/23/2005 20:16:08 ANS1228E Sending of object 'DATA:/USERS/ADMIN/ANNA/outlook_personal/anna.pst' failed 01/23/2005 20:16:08 ANS1301E Server detected system error 01/23/2005 20:30:15 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects inspected: 133,067 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects backed up: 19,612 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects updated: 0 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects rebound: 0 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects deleted: 0 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects expired:211 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects failed: 7 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of bytes transferred: 2.49 GB 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Data transfer time: 332.72 sec 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Network data transfer rate:7,866.75 KB/sec 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Aggregate data transfer rate: 1,533.02 KB/sec 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Objects compressed by:0% 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Elapsed processing time: 00:28:27 01/23/2005 20:30:16 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END 01/23/2005 20:30:16 ANS1074W *** User Abort *** 01/23/2005 20:30:16 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END SCHED5 01/23/2005 20:00:00 01/23/2005 20:30:16 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'SCHED5' failed. Return code = 12. Regards Ouen Robert E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Select files by creation date for archiving
Hi TSM-gurus, TSM client 5.1.5.0 on Windows 2000 Server. In brief: I have to archive all JPG-files older than 1 year. In Detail: * I need a list of the archived files for my user. So I need to use the CLI (right?). * I need to filter by creation date (TSM uses the modified date) because our digital cameras set the modified date to 1.1.2000 00:00 and the creation date to the current date if the user doesn't setup the camera correctly. The only solution I've found so far would be to use a tool to create a filelist and use it as input to TSM. Does anyone know a better way to do this? Does anyone know a good file listing program for windows? Thanks in advance and greetings from snowy Austria Thomas Rupp
Anyone installed 5.3 yet?
I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Paul
TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk
Hi *SM-ers! Our Windows guys discovered that one of their nodes was missing a drive backup. Drive D: was skipped during backup. The altered the dsm.opt and added D: to the domain statement. This resulted in the following error: ANS1228E Sending of object '\\kl10116j\d$' failed ANS1153E Drive : is a cluster disk. Not valid for backup/archive when CLUSTERNODE option is NO. Drive D: however is not a cluster drive, it's a local harddisk! Does anybody know what's going wrong here? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?
Hi Paul. I have implemented new and upgraded a few shops - expect a learning curve with the ISC/AC - see my previous posts to the list. The new 5.3 function (parallel/serial, migrate and reclaim commands, etc.) is great!. Also very much liked is the ability to delete individual backup files with the 5.3 client/server. Watch-for during upgrade - set minpwlength 0 otherwise the upgradedb may fail if there are node/admin passwords shorter than the current minpwlength. Joerg Pohlmann 604-535-0452 Paul Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 2005-01-24 03:15 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Anyone installed 5.3 yet? I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Paul
Re: System Error
- ANS1301E is telling you that some problem occurred on the TSM server... so what does the TSM server activity log show? - Off-hand, I do not know what specific problem you are seeing. However, 5.1.6.0 is pretty old in software-years. Consider upgrading to a current level, which may already have a fix for the problem. - Why are you using DYNAMIC serialization? In general, I would not recommend using DYNAMIC or SHRDYNAMIC unless you are 100% certain that, if you had to restore your files, your applications could tolerate fuzzy data. See the reference information for UPDATE COPYGROUP or DEFINE COPYGROUP for a discussion on this subject. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-23 23:07:00: Hi to all When running a backup on Netware client version 6.05 with TSM client version 5.1.6.0 I got this error message . I know then Outlook must be closed to prevent this error on the pst file but why the backup didn't continue Any way to conturn this problem .. My copy serialization is on Dynamic 01/23/2005 20:16:08 ANS1228E Sending of object 'DATA: /USERS/ADMIN/ANNA/outlook_personal/anna.pst' failed 01/23/2005 20:16:08 ANS1301E Server detected system error 01/23/2005 20:30:15 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects inspected: 133,067 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects backed up: 19,612 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects updated: 0 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects rebound: 0 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects deleted: 0 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects expired:211 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of objects failed: 7 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Total number of bytes transferred: 2.49 GB 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Data transfer time: 332.72 sec 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Network data transfer rate:7,866.75 KB/sec 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Aggregate data transfer rate: 1,533.02 KB/sec 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Objects compressed by:0% 01/23/2005 20:30:16 Elapsed processing time: 00:28:27 01/23/2005 20:30:16 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END 01/23/2005 20:30:16 ANS1074W *** User Abort *** 01/23/2005 20:30:16 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END SCHED5 01/23/2005 20:00:00 01/23/2005 20:30:16 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'SCHED5' failed. Return code = 12. Regards Ouen Robert E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TSM client uppgrade 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11
Hi, If I upgrade TSM client on a w2k3 server, 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11. Then I have SYSTEM OBJECT´s in 'q fi'. Compared to a clean install of 5.2.3.11. Why does SYSTEM OBJECT remain? I think SYSTEM OBJECT should be converted or expired... hopefully I´m just missing something here... Any thoughts? TSM server on w2k, 5.2.2.5. Upgraded 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11, q fi: Node Name Filespace Name --- -- STO-TW01SYSTEM OBJECT STO-TW01\\sto-tw01 \c$ STO-TW01SYSTEM STATE STO-TW01SYSTEM SERVICES STO-TW01ASR 5.2.3.11, q fi: Node Name Filespace Name --- -- STO-TW09SYSTEM SERVICES STO-TW09SYSTEM STATE STO-TW09ASR STO-TW09\\sto-tw09\c$ tia //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM DB -- How big is too big?
Hallo, Could someone explain a little more about 'expiration continuing where it left off' - this seems to imply to me that 'Cancel Proccess' on an expiration causes the work the expiration has done to roll back, whereas 'cancel expiration' does not? Matt. _-'-_ -|- -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TSM_User Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:33 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM DB -- How big is too big? If you use the durration or as Richard mentioned using the cancel expiration command then it doesn't start at the begining. But if you just cancel the process with can proc then I believe it does start at the begining. Paul Zarnowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Expiration is a key metric to determining whether your database is too large. If you cannot keep up with expiration, then your situation can deteriorate very quickly (as we discovered). A large database can also result in performance problems when doing no-query-restores or other db queries. Cancelling expiration does *not* cause you to start at the beginning again. It is fine to do this. Running multiple instances on one server may be reasonable. We did this when we split our database. It really depends on whether you are bottlenecked on a hardware resource or not. If you can't complete a full expiration in a reasonable time period (i.e., a couple days to a week), then I would say it is time to split your database. ..Paul At 01:43 PM 1/21/2005, Robin Sharpe wrote: How long does your expiration run and how have you managed it? Well, that's an interesting story... we are not doing any expirations right now due to reasons beyond my control. When we were running expirations, it ran about an hour but the database was only about 180GB then. Robin Sharpe Berlex Labs -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757 719 Rhodes Hall, Cornell University Fx: 607-255-8521 Ithaca, NY 14853-3801 Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' ___ Disclaimer Notice __ This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read by those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact us, delete the message from your computer and destroy any copies. Any distribution or copying without our prior permission is prohibited. Internet communications are not always secure and therefore Powergen Retail Limited does not accept legal responsibility for this message. The recipient is responsible for verifying its authenticity before acting on the contents. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Powergen Retail Limited. Registered addresses: Powergen Retail Limited, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8LG. Registered in England and Wales No: 3407430 Telephone +44 (0) 2476 42 4000 Fax +44 (0) 2476 42 5432
Re: TSM client uppgrade 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11
The 5.2 (and higher) client uses Microsoft's Volume Snapshot Services (VSS) for backing up Windows 2003 system state and system services, whereas the 5.1 client uses the Microsoft legacy API functions. The two methods are incompatible and cannot be converted between each other. Since the SYSTEM OBJECT file space is still restorable by the 5.2 client, the 5.3 client does not delete that file space. Once you have been running the 5.3 client for a period time, you can delete the old SYSTEM OBJECT file space at your discretion. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 06:43:08: Hi, If I upgrade TSM client on a w2k3 server, 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11. Then I have SYSTEM OBJECT´s in 'q fi'. Compared to a clean install of 5.2.3.11. Why does SYSTEM OBJECT remain? I think SYSTEM OBJECT should be converted or expired... hopefully I´m just missing something here... Any thoughts? TSM server on w2k, 5.2.2.5. Upgraded 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11, q fi: Node Name Filespace Name --- -- STO-TW01SYSTEM OBJECT STO-TW01\\sto-tw01 \c$ STO-TW01SYSTEM STATE STO-TW01SYSTEM SERVICES STO-TW01ASR 5.2.3.11, q fi: Node Name Filespace Name --- -- STO-TW09SYSTEM SERVICES STO-TW09SYSTEM STATE STO-TW09ASR STO-TW09\\sto-tw09\c$ tia //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN
Guys, We're backing up DB2 v7 (WinNT) via LANFree to a TSM 4.2 server on AIX. All has been relatively fine and dandy. However, we're now due to upgrade the TSM server to v5.2 and must therefore revert to LAN backups for this DB2 instance. Does anyone know whether a db2stop/db2start is required to pick up the change from ENABLELANFREE YES to ENABLELANFREE NO in the api dsm.opt? TIA Matt Thomas Open Systems - Backup Midrange Storage Infrastructure Services --- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes. ---
Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN
yes, db2 has to be restarted. dsm.opt/dsm.sys is only read during the startup of the db2. Jeroen -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas, Matthew Sent: maandag 24 januari 2005 15:37 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Guys, We're backing up DB2 v7 (WinNT) via LANFree to a TSM 4.2 server on AIX. All has been relatively fine and dandy. However, we're now due to upgrade the TSM server to v5.2 and must therefore revert to LAN backups for this DB2 instance. Does anyone know whether a db2stop/db2start is required to pick up the change from ENABLELANFREE YES to ENABLELANFREE NO in the api dsm.opt? TIA Matt Thomas Open Systems - Backup Midrange Storage Infrastructure Services --- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes. ---
Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN
Yes, you will need to restart DB2 as it only reads the configuration file during startup Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 TÄBY Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Thomas, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 2005-01-24 15:36 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Guys, We're backing up DB2 v7 (WinNT) via LANFree to a TSM 4.2 server on AIX. All has been relatively fine and dandy. However, we're now due to upgrade the TSM server to v5.2 and must therefore revert to LAN backups for this DB2 instance. Does anyone know whether a db2stop/db2start is required to pick up the change from ENABLELANFREE YES to ENABLELANFREE NO in the api dsm.opt? TIA Matt Thomas Open Systems - Backup Midrange Storage Infrastructure Services --- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes. ---
Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Yes, we're on AIX 5.2 and TSM 5.3 here. Very smooth upgrade (from 5.2.3), runs OK. We did hit a bug with FILE volumes, and cannot reliably use FILE volumes. Fortunately, it was quite easily worked around by temporarily using DISK volumes. Not running the Administration Center here: command line only. Nice new features are Collocation Groups, the (optional) elimination of the need to issue REPLY to commands and the Offsite Reclamation limit. Nice features on the client side: the ability for the TDPs to plug-in into the Web-interface of the standard client, so you can do TDP for Domino-restore from the regular Web-client. -- Jurjen Oskam E-mail has just erupted like a weed, and instead of considering what to say when they write, people now just let thoughts drool out onto the screen. - R. Craig Hogan
Re: TSM DB -- How big is too big?
Could someone explain a little more about 'expiration continuing where it left off' - this seems to imply to me that 'Cancel Proccess' on an expiration causes the work the expiration has done to roll back, whereas 'cancel expiration' does not? Matt - Here's what we know about it, as noted in ADSM QuickFacts: CANcel EXPIration TSM server command to cancel an expiration process if there is one currently running. This does NOT require the process ID to be specified, and so this command can be scheduled using the server administrative command scheduling utility to help manage expiration processing and the time it consumes. TSM will record the point where it stopped, in the TSM database: this sets a restart checkpoint for the next time expiration is run such that it will resume from where it left off. As such, this may be preferable to CANcel PRocess. This restartability was introduced by ADSMv3 APAR IY00629, in response to issues with long-running Expirations. A simple CANcel PRocess, on any process, serves only to terminate it. Richard Sims
Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN
Daniel (and Jeroen) - thanks for the advice. One further thought: If, for example, the StorageAgent failed or was disabled in Services, wouldn't the API default to the LAN path on finding the LANFree route unavailable? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel Sparrman Sent: 24 January 2005 14:39 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Yes, you will need to restart DB2 as it only reads the configuration file during startup Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 TÄBY Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Thomas, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 2005-01-24 15:36 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Guys, We're backing up DB2 v7 (WinNT) via LANFree to a TSM 4.2 server on AIX. All has been relatively fine and dandy. However, we're now due to upgrade the TSM server to v5.2 and must therefore revert to LAN backups for this DB2 instance. Does anyone know whether a db2stop/db2start is required to pick up the change from ENABLELANFREE YES to ENABLELANFREE NO in the api dsm.opt? TIA Matt Thomas Open Systems - Backup Midrange Storage Infrastructure Services --- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes. --- --- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes. ---
Re: TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk
Hi Richard! I checked it myself, the options file is ok. The backup GUI also just doesn't list the D: drive. Indeed it's strange that TSM says ANS1153E Drive : is a cluster disk. while you would expect message: 'ANS1153E Drive D: is a cluster disk.. I'm thinking about an incorrect registry entry, related to clustering, but I don't know which tree TSM reads to determine whether a disk is a local disk or a cluster disk. Thanks! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 14:10 To: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM Subject: Re: TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk Hi, Eric - I'm suspicious: The 1153 msg does not specify the D, so I'm wondering if in updating the options file they introduced a content error such that something else is resulting in that error. As always, when changing client options, 'dsmc q opt' should be done to validate the change, before committing to schedule/production use. Richard Sims, home in snowy Framingham, as a blizzard has closed Boston University On Jan 24, 2005, at 7:11 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote: Hi *SM-ers! Our Windows guys discovered that one of their nodes was missing a drive backup. Drive D: was skipped during backup. The altered the dsm.opt and added D: to the domain statement. This resulted in the following error: ANS1228E Sending of object '\\kl10116j\d$' failed ANS1153E Drive : is a cluster disk. Not valid for backup/archive when CLUSTERNODE option is NO. Drive D: however is not a cluster drive, it's a local harddisk! Does anybody know what's going wrong here? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN
Depends on when the storage agent fails. If it fails during backup/restore processing, the DB/2 backup(or restore) will fail. If it fails and then the DB/2 process starts, yes it will fail-over to LAN functionality. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm 6B 183 62 TÄBY Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Thomas, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 2005-01-24 15:57 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Daniel (and Jeroen) - thanks for the advice. One further thought: If, for example, the StorageAgent failed or was disabled in Services, wouldn't the API default to the LAN path on finding the LANFree route unavailable? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel Sparrman Sent: 24 January 2005 14:39 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Yes, you will need to restart DB2 as it only reads the configuration file during startup Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 TÄBY Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Thomas, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 2005-01-24 15:36 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Guys, We're backing up DB2 v7 (WinNT) via LANFree to a TSM 4.2 server on AIX. All has been relatively fine and dandy. However, we're now due to upgrade the TSM server to v5.2 and must therefore revert to LAN backups for this DB2 instance. Does anyone know whether a db2stop/db2start is required to pick up the change from ENABLELANFREE YES to ENABLELANFREE NO in the api dsm.opt? TIA Matt Thomas Open Systems - Backup Midrange Storage Infrastructure Services --- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes. --- --- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes. ---
Re: Failing incremental Oracle RMAN backups
Hi all, Further on my email on failing Oracle backups, we probably have discovered where the problem was, and it was indeed a misconfiguration. When going through all configuration files again we realised that COMMTIMEOUT and IDLETIMEOUT were only set on the TSM server and not in the storage agent's dsmsta.opt files. Once we added these, we seem to have working incremental backups. So summary: COMMTIMEOUT and IDLETIMEOUT should be set for the SAN storage agent as well as on the TSM server. Thanks, Andreas
Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN
We just moved some of our LANFree W2K and W2K3 clients from one datacenter to another. The SAN is still in the old datacenter, to LANFree from those clients is currently impossible (without additional hardware). I instructed the move team to stop, and disable the StorageAgent service on those machines that are moving, so the APIs use the default LAN path without changing any .opt files. Once the SAN is moved to the new datacenter, all we have to do is start the StorageAgent services, and life will (should) be good, again. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Sparrman Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 9:02 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Depends on when the storage agent fails. If it fails during backup/restore processing, the DB/2 backup(or restore) will fail. If it fails and then the DB/2 process starts, yes it will fail-over to LAN functionality. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm 6B 183 62 TÄBY Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Thomas, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 2005-01-24 15:57 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Daniel (and Jeroen) - thanks for the advice. One further thought: If, for example, the StorageAgent failed or was disabled in Services, wouldn't the API default to the LAN path on finding the LANFree route unavailable? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel Sparrman Sent: 24 January 2005 14:39 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Yes, you will need to restart DB2 as it only reads the configuration file during startup Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 TÄBY Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Thomas, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 2005-01-24 15:36 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN Guys, We're backing up DB2 v7 (WinNT) via LANFree to a TSM 4.2 server on AIX. All has been relatively fine and dandy. However, we're now due to upgrade the TSM server to v5.2 and must therefore revert to LAN backups for this DB2 instance. Does anyone know whether a db2stop/db2start is required to pick up the change from ENABLELANFREE YES to ENABLELANFREE NO in the api dsm.opt? TIA Matt Thomas Open Systems - Backup Midrange Storage Infrastructure Services --- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes. --- --- This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc. Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. Registered in England, number 2065. Telephone No: 020 7626 1500 Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4LH. Registered in Scotland, number 95237. Telephone No: 0131 225 4555 Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and investment business. Signatories to the Banking Codes.
Re: TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk
I suspect IC42268. The APAR description includes a circumvention. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 05:11:45: Hi *SM-ers! Our Windows guys discovered that one of their nodes was missing a drive backup. Drive D: was skipped during backup. The altered the dsm.opt and added D: to the domain statement. This resulted in the following error: ANS1228E Sending of object '\\kl10116j\d$' failed ANS1153E Drive : is a cluster disk. Not valid for backup/archive when CLUSTERNODE option is NO. Drive D: however is not a cluster drive, it's a local harddisk! Does anybody know what's going wrong here? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?
Would you please elaborate on your problem with FILE volumes? Are you no longer using them? Thanks, Gretchen Jurjen Oskam wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Yes, we're on AIX 5.2 and TSM 5.3 here. Very smooth upgrade (from 5.2.3), runs OK. We did hit a bug with FILE volumes, and cannot reliably use FILE volumes. Fortunately, it was quite easily worked around by temporarily using DISK volumes.
Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?
Hi Jurgen: Can you provide any details on the bug with FILE volumes? Is there an open APAR on this? Thanks, Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg -Original Message- From: Jurjen Oskam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 8:58 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet? On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Yes, we're on AIX 5.2 and TSM 5.3 here. Very smooth upgrade (from 5.2.3), runs OK. We did hit a bug with FILE volumes, and cannot reliably use FILE volumes. Fortunately, it was quite easily worked around by temporarily using DISK volumes. Not running the Administration Center here: command line only. Nice new features are Collocation Groups, the (optional) elimination of the need to issue REPLY to commands and the Offsite Reclamation limit. Nice features on the client side: the ability for the TDPs to plug-in into the Web-interface of the standard client, so you can do TDP for Domino-restore from the regular Web-client. -- Jurjen Oskam E-mail has just erupted like a weed, and instead of considering what to say when they write, people now just let thoughts drool out onto the screen. - R. Craig Hogan
Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?
FWIW, the README.SRV file for AIX says: When the 5.3 server starts existing FILE volumes in FILLING state are marked as full. In 5.2.x and prior servers, the server accepted a PATH definition for a local FILE Library and FILE drives, although it was not used in any way. Such definitions are not accepted by a 5.3 server and are rejected. This could be problematic if these definitions are contained in a devconfig file, and must be removed manually. Rushforth, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 01/24/2005 10:33 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet? Hi Jurgen: Can you provide any details on the bug with FILE volumes? Is there an open APAR on this? Thanks, Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg -Original Message- From: Jurjen Oskam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 8:58 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet? On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Yes, we're on AIX 5.2 and TSM 5.3 here. Very smooth upgrade (from 5.2.3), runs OK. We did hit a bug with FILE volumes, and cannot reliably use FILE volumes. Fortunately, it was quite easily worked around by temporarily using DISK volumes. Not running the Administration Center here: command line only. Nice new features are Collocation Groups, the (optional) elimination of the need to issue REPLY to commands and the Offsite Reclamation limit. Nice features on the client side: the ability for the TDPs to plug-in into the Web-interface of the standard client, so you can do TDP for Domino-restore from the regular Web-client. -- Jurjen Oskam E-mail has just erupted like a weed, and instead of considering what to say when they write, people now just let thoughts drool out onto the screen. - R. Craig Hogan
Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?
Jurjen, We are also on AIX 5.2 and currently on AIX 5.2.3.1 we will be upgrading to TSM 5.3 soon. Did you do a migrate install? Did you follow any special procedure or did you just follow the AIX smitty install instructions? We will be installing the ISC/Admin Center. Thanks Jurjen Oskam wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Yes, we're on AIX 5.2 and TSM 5.3 here. Very smooth upgrade (from 5.2.3), runs OK. We did hit a bug with FILE volumes, and cannot reliably use FILE volumes. Fortunately, it was quite easily worked around by temporarily using DISK volumes. Not running the Administration Center here: command line only. Nice new features are Collocation Groups, the (optional) elimination of the need to issue REPLY to commands and the Offsite Reclamation limit. Nice features on the client side: the ability for the TDPs to plug-in into the Web-interface of the standard client, so you can do TDP for Domino-restore from the regular Web-client. -- Jurjen Oskam E-mail has just erupted like a weed, and instead of considering what to say when they write, people now just let thoughts drool out onto the screen. - R. Craig Hogan
Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?
Hi, I recently installed 5.3 on Red Hat Linux EL 3, upgrading from 5.2.4.0. The config is very small - 15 clients, a disk pool and a tape pool, a 30-slot SCSI library (Spectra Logic 2K) with two Sony AIT drives. What's cool in 5.3 is that it uses the Linux SG driver to control SCSI devices, which means that you are no longer dependent on any Red Hat or SuSE kernel version. All you need is a distribution with a compatible level of glibc. I did an install on a Debian unstable machine with kernel 2.6.9 to test the library and the drives - works like a charm! My only problem is that the library does not dismount tapes properly (see my post earlier this month), but it was doing that even before the upgrade to 5.3. As was mentioned, the HTTP interface is deprecated in favor of ISC, but if you have 'COMMMETHOD HTTP' and 'HTTPPORT' in your dsmserv.opt, 5.3 will still start, issuing a message that they are deprecated. Dmitri --- This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. --- Le présent message (y compris tous les éléments attachés) est confidentiel et est destiné aux seules personnes qu'il vise. Si vous l'avez reçu par erreur, merci de l'indiquer à son expéditeur par retour et de procéder à sa destruction dans vos systèmes. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée de son contenu, dans sa totalité ou en partie, est strictement interdite. Merci de noter que les e-mails sont susceptibles d'être altérés. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (et les entités membres du Groupe ABN AMRO) ne saurait être tenu pour responsable ni de la transmission erronée ou incomplète des informations contenues dans ce message, ni des délais de réception ou des dommages causés à votre système. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (et les entités membres du Groupe ABN AMRO) ne garantit ni que l'intégrité de la communication ait été maintenue ni que cette transmission soit exempte de virus, d'interceptions ou d'interférences.
Filespace query
Good Afternoon. Is there an easy way to see how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up on a particular client? I can see what the total space that the client uses but I'd like to find out the individual filespaces(total). I tried to do aquery filespace owgwttsm SYSTEM OBJECT f=dand I get File space note found. I then did a query on the d drive query filespace owgwttsm \\owgttsm\d$ f=d (matches what I see for the filespace under the client name and I receive Filespace not found. == I'm running AIX 5.2 TSM5.2.2 on the server and the client is win2K SP3 with TSM 5.2.2 Have a Great Day, Eric
resourceutilization
Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filespace query
Try tacking on the NAMETYPE=UNICODE option on the QUERY FILESPACE command. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:52:44: Good Afternoon. Is there an easy way to see how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up on a particular client? I can see what the total space that the client uses but I'd like to find out the individual filespaces(total). I tried to do aquery filespace owgwttsm SYSTEM OBJECT f=d and I get File space note found. I then did a query on the d drive query filespace owgwttsm \\owgttsm\d$ f=d (matches what I see for the filespace under the client name and I receive Filespace not found. == I'm running AIX 5.2 TSM5.2.2 on the server and the client is win2K SP3 with TSM 5.2.2 Have a Great Day, Eric
Re: resourceutilization
I thought resourceutilization was a Windows Client option only.. Did that change? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: resourceutilization
I don't understand the question. What specifically is meant by one session per file? And why is the user concerned with the number of sessions? You can set RESOURCEUTILIZATION to 1, maybe that is what your user is looking for. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:59:03: Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ANR8214E connection refusal
Hello, I am seeing the following errors in the TSM server log. I can ping the client successfully and the client is up. Anyone with any other suggestions on what to check? ANR8213W Session open with saxtix11-tsm timed out. ANR8214E Session open with saxtix22-tsm failed due to connection refusal. ANR8214E Session open with saxirix_pa110-tsm failed due to connection refusal. ANR8214E Session open with spirix200-tsm failed due to connection refusal. ANR8214E Session open with spirix101-tsm failed due to connection refusal ANR8214E Session open with spirix101-tsm failed due to connection refusal TSM version 5.2.3.5 AIX clients 5.2.3 Thanks in advance for any help!
Re: resourceutilization
Nothing has changed. When this option was introduced, it was (and still is) available for all clients. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:13:46: I thought resourceutilization was a Windows Client option only.. Did that change? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: resourceutilization
Hi Andy! I guess I already knew the answer, but was wondering if there is a way to force an archive of multiple files to transfer through 1 session. We had been looking at lan-free and we were seeing multiple (2) tape mounts starting for single archive jobs. I guess I could specify maxnummp 1 and then do a resourceutilization 2, but then that limits the clients ability to send their data through more sessions and complete their archive more efficiently. To me I would want the data transferred more quickly, but in this case the request has been to keep it to 1 transfer session. In a nutshell, I don't know why they want to do it, but since they requested it I thought I would ask... Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] OMTo Sent by: ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU Re: resourceutilization 01/24/2005 01:19 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU I don't understand the question. What specifically is meant by one session per file? And why is the user concerned with the number of sessions? You can set RESOURCEUTILIZATION to 1, maybe that is what your user is looking for. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:59:03: Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: resourceutilization
Joni, try RESOURCEUTILIZATION 1. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:27:05: Hi Andy! I guess I already knew the answer, but was wondering if there is a way to force an archive of multiple files to transfer through 1 session. We had been looking at lan-free and we were seeing multiple (2) tape mounts starting for single archive jobs. I guess I could specify maxnummp 1 and then do a resourceutilization 2, but then that limits the clients ability to send their data through more sessions and complete their archive more efficiently. To me I would want the data transferred more quickly, but in this case the request has been to keep it to 1 transfer session. In a nutshell, I don't know why they want to do it, but since they requested it I thought I would ask... Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] OM To Sent by: ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU Re: resourceutilization 01/24/2005 01:19 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU I don't understand the question. What specifically is meant by one session per file? And why is the user concerned with the number of sessions? You can set RESOURCEUTILIZATION to 1, maybe that is what your user is looking for. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:59:03: Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ANR8214E connection refusal
Hello, I am seeing the following errors in the TSM server log. I can ping the client successfully and the client is up. Anyone with any other suggestions on what to check? ANR8213W Session open with saxtix11-tsm timed out. ANR8214E Session open with saxtix22-tsm failed due to connection refusal. ANR8214E Session open with saxirix_pa110-tsm failed due to connection refusal. ANR8214E Session open with spirix200-tsm failed due to connection refusal. ANR8214E Session open with spirix101-tsm failed due to connection refusal ANR8214E Session open with spirix101-tsm failed due to connection refusal TSM version 5.2.3.5 AIX clients 5.2.3 Is the client running an onboard firewall that controls incoming network connections?
Re: resourceutilization
Found in the Windows version of Backup Archive Clients Installation and User's Guide.pdf, v5.2, page 329, RESOURceutilizaion value... Supported Clients This option is valid for all Windows clients. The server can also define this option. The Tivoli Storage Manager client API does not support this option. I read that as it is only valid in Windows clients, especially since the base API doesn't support the value... Do I interpret this incorrectly? I also find no mention of the option in any of the AIX client pdfs that I have around. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:31 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization Nothing has changed. When this option was introduced, it was (and still is) available for all clients. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:13:46: I thought resourceutilization was a Windows Client option only.. Did that change? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: resourceutilization
Hi again! Won't that then reduce the restore to 1 session as well? I guess I will have to have them decide what is more important for their server. Thank you again for your help and suggestions! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] OMTo Sent by: ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU Re: resourceutilization 01/24/2005 01:39 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU Joni, try RESOURCEUTILIZATION 1. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:27:05: Hi Andy! I guess I already knew the answer, but was wondering if there is a way to force an archive of multiple files to transfer through 1 session. We had been looking at lan-free and we were seeing multiple (2) tape mounts starting for single archive jobs. I guess I could specify maxnummp 1 and then do a resourceutilization 2, but then that limits the clients ability to send their data through more sessions and complete their archive more efficiently. To me I would want the data transferred more quickly, but in this case the request has been to keep it to 1 transfer session. In a nutshell, I don't know why they want to do it, but since they requested it I thought I would ask... Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] OM To Sent by: ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU Re: resourceutilization 01/24/2005 01:19 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU I don't understand the question. What specifically is meant by one session per file? And why is the user concerned with the number of sessions? You can set RESOURCEUTILIZATION to 1, maybe that is what your user is looking for. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:59:03: Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: resourceutilization
I can see how that might be misleading, but the Windows client manual information is in the context of the Windows OS, and not necessarily that of other operating systems (Unix, NetWare, etc.). If you look in the corresponding manual for the other OSes, you'll see that RESOURCEUTILIZATION appears there, too. I don't know which PDF files you are looking at, but I verified that it goes back at least as far as the version 4.2 books (oldest manual version I have readily available) for Mac, Unix, and NetWare. RESOURCEUTILIZATION is not available in the API because that option is used to funnel data at the file level, and the TSM API does not perform any file I/O. It would be up to the vendor of an API application to implement their own RESOURCEUTILIZATION-like functionality in their application. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:46:56: Found in the Windows version of Backup Archive Clients Installation and User's Guide.pdf, v5.2, page 329, RESOURceutilizaion value... Supported Clients This option is valid for all Windows clients. The server can also define this option. The Tivoli Storage Manager client API does not support this option. I read that as it is only valid in Windows clients, especially since the base API doesn't support the value... Do I interpret this incorrectly? I also find no mention of the option in any of the AIX client pdfs that I have around. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:31 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization Nothing has changed. When this option was introduced, it was (and still is) available for all clients. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:13:46: I thought resourceutilization was a Windows Client option only.. Did that change? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: resourceutilization
OK.. I will look at the manuals again, and see what I have downloaded.. Must have mislabeled one, or something. Thanks -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:03 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization I can see how that might be misleading, but the Windows client manual information is in the context of the Windows OS, and not necessarily that of other operating systems (Unix, NetWare, etc.). If you look in the corresponding manual for the other OSes, you'll see that RESOURCEUTILIZATION appears there, too. I don't know which PDF files you are looking at, but I verified that it goes back at least as far as the version 4.2 books (oldest manual version I have readily available) for Mac, Unix, and NetWare. RESOURCEUTILIZATION is not available in the API because that option is used to funnel data at the file level, and the TSM API does not perform any file I/O. It would be up to the vendor of an API application to implement their own RESOURCEUTILIZATION-like functionality in their application. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:46:56: Found in the Windows version of Backup Archive Clients Installation and User's Guide.pdf, v5.2, page 329, RESOURceutilizaion value... Supported Clients This option is valid for all Windows clients. The server can also define this option. The Tivoli Storage Manager client API does not support this option. I read that as it is only valid in Windows clients, especially since the base API doesn't support the value... Do I interpret this incorrectly? I also find no mention of the option in any of the AIX client pdfs that I have around. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:31 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization Nothing has changed. When this option was introduced, it was (and still is) available for all clients. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:13:46: I thought resourceutilization was a Windows Client option only.. Did that change? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override the dsm.sys file and specify the resourceutilization for that archive at the time it is issue? Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filespace query
Thanks. I can now query the various drives but I cannot seem to get the SYSTEM OBJECT. I want to be able to tell how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up(90 days worth). With the space in the name it does not seem to find it. I tried using single quotes and double quotes around SYSTEM OBJECT, single and double quotes around the entire filespace(\\owgttsm\SYSTEM OBJECT) and it does not seem to find it. Thanks again, Eric -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:14 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Filespace query Try tacking on the NAMETYPE=UNICODE option on the QUERY FILESPACE command. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:52:44: Good Afternoon. Is there an easy way to see how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up on a particular client? I can see what the total space that the client uses but I'd like to find out the individual filespaces(total). I tried to do aquery filespace owgwttsm SYSTEM OBJECT f=d and I get File space note found. I then did a query on the d drive query filespace owgwttsm \\owgttsm\d$ f=d (matches what I see for the filespace under the client name and I receive Filespace not found. == I'm running AIX 5.2 TSM5.2.2 on the server and the client is win2K SP3 with TSM 5.2.2 Have a Great Day, Eric
Re: resourceutilization
Hi Joni, I had no knowledge of the restore requirement, so my suggestion was merely to limit the number of option settings to one (RESOURCEUTILIZATION), rather than two (MAXNUMMP and RESOURCEUTILIZATION). But you are correct, setting the RESOURCEUTILIZATION 1 would limit you to one restore session. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:44:51: Hi again! Won't that then reduce the restore to 1 session as well? I guess I will have to have them decide what is more important for their server. Thank you again for your help and suggestions! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] OM To Sent by: ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU Re: resourceutilization 01/24/2005 01:39 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU Joni, try RESOURCEUTILIZATION 1. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:27:05: Hi Andy! I guess I already knew the answer, but was wondering if there is a way to force an archive of multiple files to transfer through 1 session. We had been looking at lan-free and we were seeing multiple (2) tape mounts starting for single archive jobs. I guess I could specify maxnummp 1 and then do a resourceutilization 2, but then that limits the clients ability to send their data through more sessions and complete their archive more efficiently. To me I would want the data transferred more quickly, but in this case the request has been to keep it to 1 transfer session. In a nutshell, I don't know why they want to do it, but since they requested it I thought I would ask... Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] OM To Sent by: ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU Re: resourceutilization 01/24/2005 01:19 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU I don't understand the question. What specifically is meant by one session per file? And why is the user concerned with the number of sessions? You can set RESOURCEUTILIZATION to 1, maybe that is what your user is looking for. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:59:03: Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the dsm.sys file and there is no resourceutilization parameter within the file, so I believe it is using the default. I couldn't find the value for the default of the number of sessions a client can start on the TSM server, which in my case is an AIX 5.2.2.5 server. Here is the user's question: If I issue an archive with multiple files TSM starts multiple sessions - one for each file. Do we have a approach to limit the number of sessions? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated. Also, when issuing an archive, is it possible to override
Re: Filespace query
Shouldn't you be using the query occupancy command? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jones, Eric J Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:54 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Filespace query Thanks. I can now query the various drives but I cannot seem to get the SYSTEM OBJECT. I want to be able to tell how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up(90 days worth). With the space in the name it does not seem to find it. I tried using single quotes and double quotes around SYSTEM OBJECT, single and double quotes around the entire filespace(\\owgttsm\SYSTEM OBJECT) and it does not seem to find it. Thanks again, Eric -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:14 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Filespace query Try tacking on the NAMETYPE=UNICODE option on the QUERY FILESPACE command. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:52:44: Good Afternoon. Is there an easy way to see how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up on a particular client? I can see what the total space that the client uses but I'd like to find out the individual filespaces(total). I tried to do aquery filespace owgwttsm SYSTEM OBJECT f=d and I get File space note found. I then did a query on the d drive query filespace owgwttsm \\owgttsm\d$ f=d (matches what I see for the filespace under the client name and I receive Filespace not found. == I'm running AIX 5.2 TSM5.2.2 on the server and the client is win2K SP3 with TSM 5.2.2 Have a Great Day, Eric
Re: Filespace query
Whoops, I really wasn't paying attention to what you were really looking for. QUERY FILESPACE (the admin command, not the client command) shows you file system utilization on the client machine, as of the last incremental backup of that file system. Since SYSTEM OBJECT is not really a file system, no utilization is reported. However, you can view how much space on the TSM server the client file spaces are using with the QUERY OCCUPANCY command: query occupancy yournodename SYSTEM OBJECT nametype=unicode Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:53:49: Thanks. I can now query the various drives but I cannot seem to get the SYSTEM OBJECT. I want to be able to tell how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up(90 days worth). With the space in the name it does not seem to find it. I tried using single quotes and double quotes around SYSTEM OBJECT, single and double quotes around the entire filespace(\\owgttsm\SYSTEM OBJECT) and it does not seem to find it. Thanks again, Eric -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:14 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Filespace query Try tacking on the NAMETYPE=UNICODE option on the QUERY FILESPACE command. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:52:44: Good Afternoon. Is there an easy way to see how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up on a particular client? I can see what the total space that the client uses but I'd like to find out the individual filespaces(total). I tried to do aquery filespace owgwttsm SYSTEM OBJECT f=d and I get File space note found. I then did a query on the d drive query filespace owgwttsm \\owgttsm\d$ f=d (matches what I see for the filespace under the client name and I receive Filespace not found. == I'm running AIX 5.2 TSM5.2.2 on the server and the client is win2K SP3 with TSM 5.2.2 Have a Great Day, Eric
Re: Filespace query
Thanks for the help. Worked great and I have exactly what I want. Thanks again, Eric -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 2:14 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Filespace query Whoops, I really wasn't paying attention to what you were really looking for. QUERY FILESPACE (the admin command, not the client command) shows you file system utilization on the client machine, as of the last incremental backup of that file system. Since SYSTEM OBJECT is not really a file system, no utilization is reported. However, you can view how much space on the TSM server the client file spaces are using with the QUERY OCCUPANCY command: query occupancy yournodename SYSTEM OBJECT nametype=unicode Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 11:53:49: Thanks. I can now query the various drives but I cannot seem to get the SYSTEM OBJECT. I want to be able to tell how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up(90 days worth). With the space in the name it does not seem to find it. I tried using single quotes and double quotes around SYSTEM OBJECT, single and double quotes around the entire filespace(\\owgttsm\SYSTEM OBJECT) and it does not seem to find it. Thanks again, Eric -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:14 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Filespace query Try tacking on the NAMETYPE=UNICODE option on the QUERY FILESPACE command. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 10:52:44: Good Afternoon. Is there an easy way to see how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up on a particular client? I can see what the total space that the client uses but I'd like to find out the individual filespaces(total). I tried to do aquery filespace owgwttsm SYSTEM OBJECT f=d and I get File space note found. I then did a query on the d drive query filespace owgwttsm \\owgttsm\d$ f=d (matches what I see for the filespace under the client name and I receive Filespace not found. == I'm running AIX 5.2 TSM5.2.2 on the server and the client is win2K SP3 with TSM 5.2.2 Have a Great Day, Eric
restore image on windows 2000
Hi all I'm trying to restore an image of one of my Windows 2000 server Everything goes well except that the files or folders that have been deleted after the image are there ... and I dont want them. .. I did the command : dsmc retore image \\server\c$ c: -asrmode=yes -noprompt -incremental -deletefiles -virtualnode=server I'm using the procedure TSM recovery technique using Windows pre-installation environment I looked into the documentation ... they are talking about this procedure assumes that your backup followed the correct procedure to allow for incremental image restore using the -DELETEFILES option What correct procedure ??? any ideas ? thanks Luc Beaudoin Network Administrator / TSM / SAN Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D. Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254
Re: restore image on windows 2000
Did you run an incremental backup after the image backup? If you look up the BACKUP IMAGE command in the client manual, you will see a discussion about using image backup along with incremental backups to do what you want. Check out method 1. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 13:17:28: Hi all I'm trying to restore an image of one of my Windows 2000 server Everything goes well except that the files or folders that have been deleted after the image are there ... and I dont want them. .. I did the command : dsmc retore image \\server\c$ c: -asrmode=yes -noprompt -incremental -deletefiles -virtualnode=server I'm using the procedure TSM recovery technique using Windows pre-installation environment I looked into the documentation ... they are talking about this procedure assumes that your backup followed the correct procedure to allow for incremental image restore using the -DELETEFILES option What correct procedure ??? any ideas ? thanks Luc Beaudoin Network Administrator / TSM / SAN Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D. Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254
Tape volume in wrong storage pool/devclass?
This is very weird - has anyone else ever seen anything like this? TSM 5.2 on z/OS 1.4, using a 3494 ATL. I was running reclamation on my offsite copy storage pool over the weekend and got a mount failed error on a volume. Investigation showed that the volume was being requested by TSM and the request could not be filled by RMM because the volume was offsite. When I did a q vol, TSM showed that 1) the volume was in the ONSITE primary tape pool and 2) had a dataset name that corresponds with my ONSITE tape device class. RMM, however, showed that the volume had a different dataset name, one that corresponds with my OFFSITE tape device class. We recalled the volume (which WAS in the vault offsite) and dumped the label, which agreed with what RMM said. As the volume was created three weeks or so ago, and my oldest TSM log isn't that old, I can't pursue this any further. Somehow this volume got created and reused without one of TSM or RMM knowing about it, but I can't figure out how. This isn't the first strangeness I've seen lately - I had a volume get mounted for write during a copy stgpool operation; later on it was released as empty but the RMM exit apparently wasn't driven, so it got sent offsite, but TSM still thought it was available and later tried to request a mount to write on it. Level 2 and I are still scratching our heads over that one. ### Joe Howell Shelter Insurance Companies (573)-214-6534 [EMAIL PROTECTED] === This e-mail is intended only for its addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], and delete the original message. ===
Re: restore image on windows 2000
Did you run an incremental backup after the image backup? I sent this too soon: did you run a full incremental backup *before* the image, then run incremental after the image? You need to start from a full incremental backup, then run image, then subsequent incrementals, in order for the TSM server to keep track of additions to and deletions from the file system. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 13:28:12: Did you run an incremental backup after the image backup? If you look up the BACKUP IMAGE command in the client manual, you will see a discussion about using image backup along with incremental backups to do what you want. Check out method 1. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 13:17:28: Hi all I'm trying to restore an image of one of my Windows 2000 server Everything goes well except that the files or folders that have been deleted after the image are there ... and I dont want them. .. I did the command : dsmc retore image \\server\c$ c: -asrmode=yes -noprompt -incremental -deletefiles -virtualnode=server I'm using the procedure TSM recovery technique using Windows pre-installation environment I looked into the documentation ... they are talking about this procedure assumes that your backup followed the correct procedure to allow for incremental image restore using the -DELETEFILES option What correct procedure ??? any ideas ? thanks Luc Beaudoin Network Administrator / TSM / SAN Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D. Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254
Re: restore image on windows 2000
Thanks Andrew I did exactly that procedure ... but it didn't work ... I will try it again just to make sure I didn't forget a step ... but this is what I did - Full incremental of my C: and D: drive , and system object - IMAGE backup using Windows PE procedure - ADD and DELETE files and folders my C: and D; drive - Full incremental of my C: and D: drive , and system object - Crash my server - Use Windows PE and DISKPART.EXE to rebuil my partitions - Restore image of my C: drive with the -deletefiles option - Reboot - Restore incremental backup of my C: and D: drive - Restore System object - Reboot - On C: drive : all new files are there .. even the one that was deleted - On D: drive : everything is perfect (because it was not an image restore of D:) I will try again Thanks again Luc Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 2005-01-24 03:32 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: restore image on windows 2000 Did you run an incremental backup after the image backup? I sent this too soon: did you run a full incremental backup *before* the image, then run incremental after the image? You need to start from a full incremental backup, then run image, then subsequent incrementals, in order for the TSM server to keep track of additions to and deletions from the file system. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 13:28:12: Did you run an incremental backup after the image backup? If you look up the BACKUP IMAGE command in the client manual, you will see a discussion about using image backup along with incremental backups to do what you want. Check out method 1. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 13:17:28: Hi all I'm trying to restore an image of one of my Windows 2000 server Everything goes well except that the files or folders that have been deleted after the image are there ... and I dont want them. .. I did the command : dsmc retore image \\server\c$ c: -asrmode=yes -noprompt -incremental -deletefiles -virtualnode=server I'm using the procedure TSM recovery technique using Windows pre-installation environment I looked into the documentation ... they are talking about this procedure assumes that your backup followed the correct procedure to allow for incremental image restore using the -DELETEFILES option What correct procedure ??? any ideas ? thanks Luc Beaudoin Network Administrator / TSM / SAN Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D. Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254
Fw: TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk
Eric, I forgot to mention... this is already fixed in 5.3.0. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. - Forwarded by Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM on 2005-01-24 13:43 - Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM 2005-01-24 08:22 To ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk I suspect IC42268. The APAR description includes a circumvention. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-01-24 05:11:45: Hi *SM-ers! Our Windows guys discovered that one of their nodes was missing a drive backup. Drive D: was skipped during backup. The altered the dsm.opt and added D: to the domain statement. This resulted in the following error: ANS1228E Sending of object '\\kl10116j\d$' failed ANS1153E Drive : is a cluster disk. Not valid for backup/archive when CLUSTERNODE option is NO. Drive D: however is not a cluster drive, it's a local harddisk! Does anybody know what's going wrong here? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
TSM disk failover?
I heard there is a way to set up failover with TSM's disk cache. In talking with a colleague he indicated TSM had the ability to perform transparent failover between disk volumes. Example: A TSM server is writing data to a disk volume. Disk volume fails. TSM immediately begins writing to a second disk volume (could be on a separate array). This assumes that TSM is using the backup to disk option and data is received by the server via LAN based clients. Unfortunately while he indicated that he thought it had the capability, he couldn't tell me how to deploy it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. David A. Chapa | ADIC | 720.272.8452 cell | http://www.adic.com
Export node direct to managed server problems.
Hey guys. We have four TSM servers (long story, don't ask) across two sites, setup with one as a config manager, the other three all subscribing to the config pushed out by the manager. For various DR reasons, we're wanting to do data exports from those four servers to a fifth server, located at a completely different site to any of the four main servers. These exports are for a limited subset of the servers being backed up, and there's no easy way to separate them from the not-to-be-exported hosts in terms of policy domains, storage pools, etc. At the moment, the intent is to use the export node command to push the data across directly to the fifth TSM server. I've defined the server links and the requisite administrators. I've also -- by way of experimentation as much as anything else -- set up the fifth server to subscribe to the same config pushed to the other servers. I'm now finding that, whenever I try to export a server directly to this fifth server, I get a bunch of error messages in the logs. Some of them are relatively spurious[1]; others, however, are of concern[2]. I've had similar problems previously, which were rectified by changing the version of the TSM server software running on each host to match (they're all running version 5, release 2, level 3.2 now). I'm pretty sure these problems only started after I made the fifth server a managed server, rather than being mostly independent. So. Questions. * Can a server to which data is being exported directly over the network be managed, or must it be completely independent? * If it can be managed, how can the spurious errors about managed objects be suppressed? * If it can only be managed for certain config items, what are the restrictions on what can and cannot be managed? * If it _can't_ be managed, I'm curious to know why not. (This one doesn't really matter beyond satisfying my curiosity :) * Presumably, there is no problem with making the server link information for the importing server managed -- that the issue is purely with making the importing server managed by one of the exporting servers? Having managed profiles would make a number of things a lot easier, but if I have to live without them, so be it. Also, if there are any trips or traps that would be useful to know, I'd greatly appreciate knowing them. :) If there are any details that need to be disclosed for this one to be tracked down, let me know; I'm well aware that the above is rather vague, but it's hard to know when you're just setting out what might be relevant and what might not be. Thanks for any and all advice you can give, Stuart. [1] For example: 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0646I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): DEFINE CLIENTOPT: AMCommand cannot be executed - option set NW is a managed object. (PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0730E IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Internal error from AMcommand 'DEFINE CLIENTOPT NW INCLEXCL exclude sys:\vol$log.err FORCE=Yes SEQNUMBER=11'. (PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR3229E DEFINE CLIENTOPT: Command cannot be executed - AMoption set NW is a managed object. (SESSION: 4560, PROCESS: 27) [2] Prime case in point: 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0730E IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Internal error from AMcommand 'REGISTER NODE SOMENODENAME DOMAIN=NW_PD CONTACT= COMPRESSION=CLIENT ARCHDELETE=YES BACKDELETE =NO URL=SOMENODENAME.its.monash.edu.au:2002 CLOPTSET= NW FILEAGGR=YES AUTOFSRENAME=NO VALIDATEPROTOCOL=NO DATAWRITEPATH=ANY DATAREADPATH=ANY SESSIONINIT=CLIENTORS ERVER TYPE=CLIENT'. (PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0728E IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Processing terminated AMabnormally - internal error. (PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0620I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Copied 0 domain(s). AM(PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0621I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Copied 0 policy sets. AM(PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0622I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Copied 0 management AMclasses. (PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0623I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Copied 0 copy groups. AM(PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0624I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Copied 0 schedules. AM(PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0625I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Copied 0 administrato AMrs. (PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0891I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Copied 0 optionset AMdefinitions. (PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0626I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Copied 0 node AMdefinitions. (PROCESS: 27) 01/25/2005 11:14:45 ANR0627I IMPORT (from Server TSM1): Copied 0 file spaces 0 AM
Define dbvolumes on raw disks
I'm a nubie. I've had one class and wasn't even here when TSM was installed. I have less than a year of experience with Solaris and way less than that with TSM. I sort of got drafted into this. Solaris 9 TSM Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.5 Library is a SUn/StorageTek L700e30 with ten IBM Ultrium LTO2 tape drives. I know what I need to do but not exactly how to do it. I need to define a dbvolume to TSM and extend it. Sounds simple enough but when I started looking at how to do this and the current configuration it didn't seem so simple anymore. I have several questions before I try this. The existing volumes are on raw disks. When I create a new dbvolume do I need to run the define dbvolume command on both raw disks? There are two copies of the database. Do I need to extend them both or do they automagicly sync somehow. How can I find out what the names of the existing volumes are? I sure don't want to overwrite anything. Is there a howto procedures any where for this? Can spacetriggers be used for raw disks? Sounds like a good idea. Thanks
Re: Export node direct to managed server problems.
On 25/01/2005, at 11:31 AM, I wrote: I've defined the server links and the requisite administrators. I've also -- by way of experimentation as much as anything else -- set up the fifth server to subscribe to the same config pushed to the other servers. I'm now finding that, whenever I try to export a server directly to this fifth server, I get a bunch of error messages in the logs. Some of them are relatively spurious[1]; others, however, are of concern[2]. Does anybody know where I can find a supplier of soft brick walls? *sighs* Looks like the problem's solved: I forgot to activate the policy sets on the fifth server. Talk about your trivial fixes ... Please excuse me; I have some banging of heads (mostly my own) to do.
To configure Sun's StorEdge L1000 library in tivoli
Hi Gurus, Can any body help me in configuring sun's L1000 automated library with tivoli storage manager which is installed in solaris OS. As per the notes in the admin guide of solaris 1.installed TIVsmSdev driver. but getting error when tried to update the mt.conf and lb.conf file using add_drv command. Please help me to proceed with configuring the library in tivoli storage manager. Thanks Geetha Thanu -
