Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new
At 06:56 AM 1/23/2006, Dirk Kastens wrote: Paul Zarnowski schrieb: TSM does not do round-robin allocation of DB pages across it's volumes. It fills up one, then works on the next. Are you shure? I think this only applies to log volumes. That's the way it was explained to me years ago. Easy enough to test, I guess. Start a new server with a few empty db volumes, and watch the I/O activity. -- Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757 Manager, Storage Systems Fx: 607-255-8521 719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Increasing bufpoolsize issue
Rich - Thanks for the actual error messages. Whereas you are running AIX: The ANR0358E may be a consequence of your static /etc/security/limits values for root (or whatever user the instance is running under), and/or the shell Unix Resource Limits in effect for that session when the server was started. Richard Sims
Re: Increasing bufpoolsize issue
Hi , Here is the error I saw when trying to start up my second instance : Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000 Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.6 Licensed Materials - Property of IBM 5698-ISE (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999,2002. All rights reserved. U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation. ANR0900I Processing options file /tsmserv/bin/dsmserv.opt. ANR7811I Direct I/O will be used for all eligible disk files. ANR0990I Server restart-recovery in progress. ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 4092 megabytes. ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 59680 megabytes. ANR0306I Recovery log volume mount in progress. ANR0358E Database initialization failed: sufficient memory is not available. When I put my bufpoolsize parameter back to it's original size, the second instance came up with no problem. The paging space ( total physical memory we have is 9Gb, paging space is 6Gb ) is barely used, only 10%. Rich -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kurt Beyers Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 3:37 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Increasing bufpoolsize issue Rich, A bit of a wild guess, but is there enough swap space to host the increased buffpoolsize. I know that the buffpoolsize should remain in the physical memory. But if the second instance starts up after adding some additional swap space, you know that it was the bottleneck. Will TSM itself allocate the buffpoolsize in the physical memory anyway? regards, Kury Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager namens Richard Mochnaczewski Verzonden: ma 1/23/2006 21:34 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] Increasing bufpoolsize issue Hi Everybody, I have two instances of TSM 5.1.6 running on my AIX server . I added 1Gb of physical memory and increased the bufpoolsize in both instances by 512Mb . After the reboot, one instance came up fine and the other one complained about not enough memory available . Why would it complain about memory, seeing that I had already increased the bufpoolsize by 512M ? Rich
Re: logpin issue
Ashok - Topic "Recovery Log pinning/pinned" in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ ADSM.QuickFacts summarizes the issue and quotes IBM Technotes which address remediation. The TSM Problem Determination Guide also has notes on pinning/pinned. Richard Sims On Jan 23, 2006, at 3:30 PM, Vats.Ashok wrote: We are experiencing more and more logpin issue. we are running db=160GB & log size=12GB. i t is not a particular client which will hung up the sessions. It is at random we are on tsm 5.3.0.0 aix 5.3. ml 02 IS anybody out there experience similar issue ? What can be done to can a hung session to avoid logpin issue. Appreciate any input ... Regards, Ashok
Re: Increasing bufpoolsize issue
Rich, A bit of a wild guess, but is there enough swap space to host the increased buffpoolsize. I know that the buffpoolsize should remain in the physical memory. But if the second instance starts up after adding some additional swap space, you know that it was the bottleneck. Will TSM itself allocate the buffpoolsize in the physical memory anyway? regards, Kury Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager namens Richard Mochnaczewski Verzonden: ma 1/23/2006 21:34 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] Increasing bufpoolsize issue Hi Everybody, I have two instances of TSM 5.1.6 running on my AIX server . I added 1Gb of physical memory and increased the bufpoolsize in both instances by 512Mb . After the reboot, one instance came up fine and the other one complained about not enough memory available . Why would it complain about memory, seeing that I had already increased the bufpoolsize by 512M ? Rich
Increasing bufpoolsize issue
Hi Everybody, I have two instances of TSM 5.1.6 running on my AIX server . I added 1Gb of physical memory and increased the bufpoolsize in both instances by 512Mb . After the reboot, one instance came up fine and the other one complained about not enough memory available . Why would it complain about memory, seeing that I had already increased the bufpoolsize by 512M ? Rich
logpin issue
We are experiencing more and more logpin issue. we are running db=160GB & log size=12GB. i t is not a particular client which will hung up the sessions. It is at random we are on tsm 5.3.0.0 aix 5.3. ml 02 IS anybody out there experience similar issue ? What can be done to can a hung session to avoid logpin issue. Appreciate any input ... Regards, Ashok
Re: What does "updated" really mean?
Richard, Thanks. I was searching for the message number because I was worring that searching for "updating" would be like searching Google for "Windows". In reality, when I searched the V 5.1 Windows client manual for "updating" I got exactly 8 hits. The first hit was the reference cited by the replies. Tab Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 01/23/2006 10:19 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: What does "updated" really mean? Tab - That's documented in the client manuals, under topic "Displaying backup processing status ". Richard Sims
Re: What does "updated" really mean?
Tab - That's documented in the client manuals, under topic "Displaying backup processing status ". Richard Sims
Re: AW: [ADSM-L] What does "updated" really mean?
Thomas, Thanks very much. That is what I would expect given our work this weekend. And although I've checked Richard's site before, I simply forgot to check it today. Monday morning and all that... Tab Thomas Rupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 01/23/2006 10:01 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject AW: [ADSM-L] What does "updated" really mean? Always first have a look at Richards fabulous TSM site: http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir Objects Updated "Total number of objects updated" element in a backup statistics summary. The Objects Updated field displays the number of files or directories whose contents did not change but whose attributes or ACLs had changed. The server updates its information about the attributes or ACLs without the objects themselves having to be sent to the server. HTH Thomas Rupp -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tab Trepagnier Gesendet: Montag, 23. Jänner 2006 16:56 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: [ADSM-L] What does "updated" really mean? Server: TSM 5.1.10.0 on AIX 5.2; client: TSM 5.1.7.0 on Windows 2003 I'm trying to understand what the client is reporting in the session summary when it reports: "01/23/2006 08:20:23 ANE4958I (Session: 47866, Node: ILOX-FS1) Total number of objects updated:673,012" I've checked the product manuals, message manuals, IBM software support site, and the forum site. What exactly is being "updated?" We made some changes to that server over the weekend so the presence of the message and its non-zero count is no surprise. But I'd still like to understand exactly what TSM is trying to tell me. Thanks. Tab Trepagnier TSM Administrator Laitram, L.L.C.
Re: What does "updated" really mean?
Tab, They tell the following in the technote http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q1=Total+number+objects+updated&uid=swg21154305&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en Updating-->. Indicates that only the file meta data is sent, if file attributes change and not the data itselfUpdating-->. Indicates that only the file meta data is sent, if file attributes change and not the data itself best regards, Kurt Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager namens Tab Trepagnier Verzonden: ma 1/23/2006 16:56 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] What does "updated" really mean? Server: TSM 5.1.10.0 on AIX 5.2; client: TSM 5.1.7.0 on Windows 2003 I'm trying to understand what the client is reporting in the session summary when it reports: "01/23/2006 08:20:23 ANE4958I (Session: 47866, Node: ILOX-FS1) Total number of objects updated:673,012" I've checked the product manuals, message manuals, IBM software support site, and the forum site. What exactly is being "updated?" We made some changes to that server over the weekend so the presence of the message and its non-zero count is no surprise. But I'd still like to understand exactly what TSM is trying to tell me. Thanks. Tab Trepagnier TSM Administrator Laitram, L.L.C.
AW: [ADSM-L] What does "updated" really mean?
Always first have a look at Richards fabulous TSM site: http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir Objects Updated "Total number of objects updated" element in a backup statistics summary. The Objects Updated field displays the number of files or directories whose contents did not change but whose attributes or ACLs had changed. The server updates its information about the attributes or ACLs without the objects themselves having to be sent to the server. HTH Thomas Rupp -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tab Trepagnier Gesendet: Montag, 23. Jänner 2006 16:56 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: [ADSM-L] What does "updated" really mean? Server: TSM 5.1.10.0 on AIX 5.2; client: TSM 5.1.7.0 on Windows 2003 I'm trying to understand what the client is reporting in the session summary when it reports: "01/23/2006 08:20:23 ANE4958I (Session: 47866, Node: ILOX-FS1) Total number of objects updated:673,012" I've checked the product manuals, message manuals, IBM software support site, and the forum site. What exactly is being "updated?" We made some changes to that server over the weekend so the presence of the message and its non-zero count is no surprise. But I'd still like to understand exactly what TSM is trying to tell me. Thanks. Tab Trepagnier TSM Administrator Laitram, L.L.C.
What does "updated" really mean?
Server: TSM 5.1.10.0 on AIX 5.2; client: TSM 5.1.7.0 on Windows 2003 I'm trying to understand what the client is reporting in the session summary when it reports: "01/23/2006 08:20:23 ANE4958I (Session: 47866, Node: ILOX-FS1) Total number of objects updated:673,012" I've checked the product manuals, message manuals, IBM software support site, and the forum site. What exactly is being "updated?" We made some changes to that server over the weekend so the presence of the message and its non-zero count is no surprise. But I'd still like to understand exactly what TSM is trying to tell me. Thanks. Tab Trepagnier TSM Administrator Laitram, L.L.C.
Re: dsmadmc keyboard input problem
Same applies for "Enter your user id:" prompt, backspace behaves differently than command line entering. On 1/22/06, Jurjen Oskam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:16:07PM -0600, Mike wrote: > > > Have you tried changing your terminal emulation and the TERM variable? > > Yes, I have, as I explicitly mentioned. The problem is not that Backspace > does or doesn't work, the problem is that with the *same* settings, it > works *differently* depending on what kind of input dsmadmc expects. > > And this wouldn't even be a problem if dsmadmc rejected input like "nyes" > or "y^Hn". > > -- > Jurjen Oskam > -- Helder Garcia
Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new
Hi, Paul Zarnowski schrieb: TSM does not do round-robin allocation of DB pages across it's volumes. It fills up one, then works on the next. Are you shure? I think this only applies to log volumes. -- Viele Gruesse, Dirk Kastens Universitaet Osnabrueck, Rechenzentrum (Computer Center) Albrechtstr. 28, 49069 Osnabrueck, Germany Tel.: +49-541-969-2347, FAX: -2470
Re: ANR0102E imarins.c(2246)
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q1=insert ing+row+in+table+%22Object.Ids%22&uid=swg1IC47516&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lan g=en //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nielsen, Bo Sent: den 22 januari 2006 23:06 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: ANR0102E imarins.c(2246) Hi I have reorganize my TSM DB yesterday, and now I get this error: ANR0102E imarins.c(2246): Error 1 inserting row in table "Object.Ids". (SESSION: 1804) ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 1804 for node CDKALB014 (WinNT) - internal server error detected. (SESSION: 1804) > Regards > Bo Nielsen > * +45 4386 4671 > Coop Norden IT* (Internt postcenter): 6244 Data & Storage Center * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember, a dead fish can float downstream, But it takes a live one to svim upstream. - W.C. Fields. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
