Re: Tapes read only

2006-08-03 Thread Yiannakis Vakis
Usually what I do is to change the access to readwrite and let TSM use them
again. If you see that they give errors and TSM changes them back to
readonly again then you should move the data and replace them.
Yiannakis

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Orin Rehorst
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Tapes read only

Ran q vol access=readonly. Two tapes were listed. What do I do now, replace
them?
TIA
Orin Rehorst

Volume Name   Storage  Device  EstimatedPct
Volume
  Pool NameClass Name   Capacity   Util
Status
  ---  --  -  -

125ACAL1  TAPEPOOL LTOCLASS1 0.00.0
Empty
126ACAL1  TAPEPOOL LTOCLASS1   200,000.09.5
Filling


Re: TSM monitoring

2006-08-03 Thread Leigh Reed
I have used custom Perl scripts, ServerGraph and TSM Operational
Reporting.

Custom Perl Scripts
Are obviously very flexible and given the Perl knowledge and time
(neither of which I have great deal of), you can get them to do almost
anything. I did also use some of the Perl scripting developed by Richard
Sims for the accounting report. You can find it at
http://people.bu.edu/rbs/adsm-report

ServerGraph
I found this to be a very good management tool. You do need a little bit
of expertise to get it all set up, although I haven't used the Windows
version. I found the development team very willing to accommodate new
ideas and incorporate them into future releases. I would say that the
product is higher end and is reflected in the price.

TSM Operational Reporting
In my view, a much underrated tool. It's free, that is, it comes with
TSM. Only runs on windows, so you may need a separate server if your TSM
server(s) are Unix.
Functionality is limited to really only SQL queries, but with a little
practice and some ingenuity, you can squeeze a little extra out of it.
It comes with a number of standard reports and they can give you a feel
for how the product works. From there on, you can start to tailor your
own reports/monitors.

I've never used TSM Manager, but it seems from the posts that it's
popular.

Leigh



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: 02 August 2006 17:53
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM monitoring

I'm curious what folks are using to monitor TSM and send alerts for
missed
and failed backups.



Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator

SAIC M/S-G1b

(858)826-4062

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Test Email

2006-08-03 Thread Richard Sims

On Aug 2, 2006, at 4:57 PM, John Schneider wrote:


Sorry to bother everyone, but I have posted two emails in the past
2 days,
and although I got a confirmation from the listserv when I posted
them, I
never saw the emails themselves post to the list, and have not
gotten any
replies at all, which is unusual for this list.

Could a few of you reply back to me and at least let me know if my
posts are
making it to the list?


To determine if your postings are being fully processed, simply
examine the list archives, the best venue being www.mail-archive.com/
adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/.  All accepted postings are archived.  There is
no need to ask the 1500 members of the list.

   Richard Simshttp://people.bu.edu/rbs


Re: Tapes read only

2006-08-03 Thread Richard Sims

On Aug 2, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Orin Rehorst wrote:


Ran q vol access=readonly. Two tapes were listed. What do I do now,
replace them?


Orin -

Examine the Activity Log to determine the circumstances under which
the tapes changed to that state.  If due to I/O errors, that could be
the fault of either drive or media.  If media is suspect, move the
data off the volume, do a no-eject Checkout, then use tapeutil or
like utility to perform a full media test.  If it passes, reintroduce
the tape to TSM service via Label Libvolume.

   Richard Sims


Re: crawling system

2006-08-03 Thread Richard Sims

Geoff -

If TSM is slow to respond to anything on that system, it is likely
that the system in general is hurting, perhaps due to a runaway
process or virtual storage shortage.  Your AIX Error Log and /var/adm/
messages are worth checking, as well as 'topas'.  If it's only TSM,
then there may be a looping thread in the server process.  Do Query
PRocess and Query SEssion to see what's happening, and the Activity
Log for general circumstances.  Don't overlook network causes...where
other people in your shop may be pondering the same problem.

  Richard Sims


Re: Test Email

2006-08-03 Thread Michael S Irish
Test e-mail recd.


Re: Tape Drive Choices: What, and why?

2006-08-03 Thread Johnson, Milton
 On-site tapes: Virtual Tape Library (Sepaton S2100-ES2)

Off-site tapes: IBM 3494 with 2 3590E1A drives

H. Milton Johnson
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 9:37 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Tape Drive Choices: What, and why?

Hi, all.

I'm looking into what choices folks have made for their tape drives, and
why they picked what they did.  I'm really happy with what I've got, but
I figure that state is perpetuated by questioning it, rather than
settling in.


I'm running 3590s (on the way out) and 3592s.  The capacity is close to
the top per-cartridge (500G raw per cart), and the speed is quite good,
~80GB/s.

When we added the 1-gen 3592s a few years ago, seek speed was an
important difference between that and the then current LTO2; I
understand that LTO3 has made up some ground there but not all the way.

My drives are getting a duty cycle approaching 100%; there are very few
times of the day I don't have jobs waiting in line for them.  My SE is
kind of nervous about them; he says we're mean to them. :)

I am given to understand that this kind of treatment tears LTO3s apart;
they aren't designed for that kind of 24x7 usage.

In a nutshell, I love my 3592s, I run them constantly and have
essentially no maintenance issues with them.  I've got some of them in a
remote installation ~300 miles away, and run them with confidence, so
far borne out. (8 months of production)



So, any opinions?  Love stories for LTO3 or that sun whatever-1000 ?
Hate stories?



- Allen S. Rout


Re: Tape Drive Choices: What, and why?

2006-08-03 Thread Steven Harris
Allen,

 I too thought that LTOs might not be up to scratch for 24x7 operation, but
I recently went looking.  I could only find information for generation 1 of
LTO, but both LTO1 and SDLT are rated at 250,000 hours MTBF on a 100% duty
cycle.

Now that figure may be playing with engineering numbers, and I'm not sure
that I really know what it means - I'm certain that in real life drives fail
more frequently than that, so manufacturers must obviously fiddle with the
definition of a failure to get their numbers.

Anyway, the gist is that LTO drives are ready for 24x7 operation.

Regards

Steve

Steven Harris
AIX and TSM admin
Brisbane Australia


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2006 12:37 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Tape Drive Choices: What, and why?

Hi, all.

I'm looking into what choices folks have made for their tape drives,
and why they picked what they did.  I'm really happy with what I've
got, but I figure that state is perpetuated by questioning it, rather
than settling in.


I'm running 3590s (on the way out) and 3592s.  The capacity is close
to the top per-cartridge (500G raw per cart), and the speed is quite
good, ~80GB/s.

When we added the 1-gen 3592s a few years ago, seek speed was an
important difference between that and the then current LTO2; I
understand that LTO3 has made up some ground there but not all the
way.

My drives are getting a duty cycle approaching 100%; there are very
few times of the day I don't have jobs waiting in line for them.  My
SE is kind of nervous about them; he says we're mean to them. :)

I am given to understand that this kind of treatment tears LTO3s
apart; they aren't designed for that kind of 24x7 usage.

In a nutshell, I love my 3592s, I run them constantly and have
essentially no maintenance issues with them.  I've got some of them in
a remote installation ~300 miles away, and run them with confidence,
so far borne out. (8 months of production)



So, any opinions?  Love stories for LTO3 or that sun whatever-1000 ?
Hate stories?



- Allen S. Rout




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/406 - Release Date: 2/08/2006


Fw: crawling system

2006-08-03 Thread Nicholas Cassimatis
Geoff,

Another place to look is at your disk subsystem - from the host controller
all the way to physical disks.  I've seen disk units having problems, but
no errors being recorded on the host (TSM) server.   If you start having to
retry every disk operation a few times, performance degrades significantly.

Nick Cassimatis

- Forwarded by Nicholas Cassimatis/Raleigh/IBM on 08/03/2006 09:38 AM
-

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 08/03/2006
07:08:52 AM:

 Geoff -

 If TSM is slow to respond to anything on that system, it is likely
 that the system in general is hurting, perhaps due to a runaway
 process or virtual storage shortage.  Your AIX Error Log and /var/adm/
 messages are worth checking, as well as 'topas'.  If it's only TSM,
 then there may be a looping thread in the server process.  Do Query
 PRocess and Query SEssion to see what's happening, and the Activity
 Log for general circumstances.  Don't overlook network causes...where
 other people in your shop may be pondering the same problem.

Richard Sims

Need help with Bare Metal backup/restore

2006-08-03 Thread Ila Patel
Can anyone please tell me if it possible to do a bare metal backup/restore
 of windows XP from incremental nightly backups?  Enduser makes change
weekly.
beside ASR.



Ila


Need help with Bare Metal backup/restore on XP

2006-08-03 Thread Ila Patel
Hi All,

Can anyone please tell me if it possible to do a bare metal backup/restore
 of windows XP from incremental nightly backups?  Enduser makes change
weekly.
beside ASR.



Ila


Re: Need help with Bare Metal backup/restore

2006-08-03 Thread Leigh Reed
Ila

I find that this Technote is the best overview for BMR of the Windows
variety.
It covers the process with and without ASR.

http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663context=SSGSG7q1=116481
2uid=swg21164812loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en

Leigh

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ila Patel
Sent: 03 August 2006 16:06
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Need help with Bare Metal backup/restore

Can anyone please tell me if it possible to do a bare metal
backup/restore
 of windows XP from incremental nightly backups?  Enduser makes change
weekly.
beside ASR.



Ila


open source clone of tsm?

2006-08-03 Thread Mike
I need something with some of TSM's abilities. I have enough
disk space on the 'backup' server that I can rsync all other
servers to the backup server, however the amount of data to
backup is greater than the tape size. I could use multi-volume
tars, though I prefer to be more 'hands-off' than that. I'd
like some program to look at the given files/filesystems for
backup, decide what needs backing up as a full and as an
incremental, send those files to tape making one tape a day.
The program needs to keep track of how infrequently files are
backed up that are not changed, essentially forcing a full of
files over time to keep them current on tapes, etc.

The program also needs to know how to ask for tapes in their
proper order for restoring files/filesystems.

I have come to like TSM, but I do not have the budget for
a 3494 or other tape changer, or for the software for that
matter.

Does this exist somewhere or someone have a better idea?

Mike


Re: open source clone of tsm?

2006-08-03 Thread Allen S. Rout
 On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:22:07 -0500, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:


 I have come to like TSM, but I do not have the budget for a 3494 or
 other tape changer, or for the software for that matter.

 Does this exist somewhere or someone have a better idea?

10 years ago I started working on something which I have come to
understand as grasping for TSM's features.  This is what I was
designing then, and for the dramatically lower performance domain you
discuss it remains sane.


+ Use TAR's 'newer' option to get incremental-like behavaior. Always
  record timestamps of when a run began, use them to calculate
  timestamps of later runs.  This is better than dump.

+ Always do verbose output, record all those outputs.  This is your
  TSM DB.

+ Record metadata about the run to decrease the number of the output
  listings you have to uncompress and grep to locate the instances of
  a file.

+ Since you're tarring to disk initially, you can get something like
  copy pools by dding your bzipped tar onto more than one tape.

+ Record metadata about which runs get copied to which tapes.


Then your DR operations involve a more conventional tarring up of the
metadata collection onto media.


You don't get progressive backups: you're still at some sort of
full/incremental/differential scheme. Explicitly using -newer dates
gives you a lot of flexibility, but you don't know what you really
have unless you do another full.

Same lack-of-progressive-backups problem on restore:  Must restore
many different backups to bring image up to date.

You get no retry flexibility.

You get no validation of data on tape (reclamation).

Your database queries will be long and I/O and CPU intensive; but
better than getting the TOCs of all the tars...



Personally, I wouldn't trust it farther than I could throw it.  And I
wrote it.


- Allen S. Rout
- Really, you can't afford -NOT- to do TSM.


backup schedule question?

2006-08-03 Thread Joni Moyer
Hey Everyone!

I need a backup to run on Monday, Wednesday and Friday only.  If I create
a backup schedule that starts on a Monday, Period = 2, Period Unit=Days,
Day of Week=weekday will this backup schedule always run on Monday, Wed,
Friday only?  Or will it begin by running on M,W,F and then since Sunday
isn't a weekday it will then run on Tues, Thurs.  of the next week? Thanks
in advance for your help with this matter!


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Senior Systems Programmer
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: backup schedule question?

2006-08-03 Thread Choudarapu, Ramakrishna (GTI)
Use SCHEDStyle=Enhanced and DAYofweek=M,W,F

Regards,
Rama

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:51 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] backup schedule question?


Hey Everyone!

I need a backup to run on Monday, Wednesday and Friday only.  If I
create
a backup schedule that starts on a Monday, Period = 2, Period Unit=Days,
Day of Week=weekday will this backup schedule always run on Monday, Wed,
Friday only?  Or will it begin by running on M,W,F and then since Sunday
isn't a weekday it will then run on Tues, Thurs.  of the next week?
Thanks
in advance for your help with this matter!


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Senior Systems Programmer
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, 
delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or 
redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this 
e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/



primary and copy storage pool comparisons

2006-08-03 Thread Tim Brown

I thought once I used a command that would compare the primary and copy
storage
pools, showing whether or not they are in sync.

Does anyone know of this or am I just mistaken.

Tim Brown
Systems Specialist
Central Hudson Gas  Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255


Re: primary and copy storage pool comparisons

2006-08-03 Thread Pugliese, Edward
 backup stg primary_pool copy_pool preview=vol 

This will show you what tapes are needed if they are not in sync.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tim Brown
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] primary and copy storage pool comparisons

I thought once I used a command that would compare the primary and copy
storage pools, showing whether or not they are in sync.

Does anyone know of this or am I just mistaken.

Tim Brown
Systems Specialist
Central Hudson Gas  Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged 
information. Any dissemination or use of the information by a person other than 
the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, 
delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Although this e-mail and any 
attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might 
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no 
responsibility is accepted by the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc. 
or the New York Clearing Corporation for any loss or damage arising in any way 
from its use. Thank you.
 


Re: backup schedule question?

2006-08-03 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello Rama,

I don't have the TSM server at 5.3 yet.  I am only at 5.2.7.1, so I don't
believe that that capability is there for my level of TSM code.  Is that
correct?


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Senior Systems Programmer
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Choudarapu, Ramakrishna (GTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
08/03/2006 01:10 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: backup schedule question?






Use SCHEDStyle=Enhanced and DAYofweek=M,W,F

Regards,
Rama

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:51 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] backup schedule question?


Hey Everyone!

I need a backup to run on Monday, Wednesday and Friday only.  If I
create
a backup schedule that starts on a Monday, Period = 2, Period Unit=Days,
Day of Week=weekday will this backup schedule always run on Monday, Wed,
Friday only?  Or will it begin by running on M,W,F and then since Sunday
isn't a weekday it will then run on Tues, Thurs.  of the next week?
Thanks
in advance for your help with this matter!


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Senior Systems Programmer
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain
or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to
this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/



Re: primary and copy storage pool comparisons

2006-08-03 Thread Thorneycroft, Doug
You can also use: QUERY CONTENT volume-name COPIED=NO

Or check the output from QUERY OCCUPANCY command to see if 
the number of files in primary Pools = number in copy pools.

Also see IC49768 for information on files that aren't copied, even
though the backup stg processing completes successfully.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Pugliese, Edward
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 10:49 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: primary and copy storage pool comparisons


 backup stg primary_pool copy_pool preview=vol 

This will show you what tapes are needed if they are not in sync.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tim Brown
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] primary and copy storage pool comparisons

I thought once I used a command that would compare the primary and copy
storage pools, showing whether or not they are in sync.

Does anyone know of this or am I just mistaken.

Tim Brown
Systems Specialist
Central Hudson Gas  Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged 
information. Any dissemination or use of the information by a person other than 
the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, 
delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Although this e-mail and any 
attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might 
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no 
responsibility is accepted by the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc. 
or the New York Clearing Corporation for any loss or damage arising in any way 
from its use. Thank you.
 


Re: PIT-Restore does not show dirs

2006-08-03 Thread Paul Zarnowski

TSM is very complex.  It has a lot of options and features.  Training
sessions are a great way to show users how to use the product, but
not as a means to discuss the non-intuitive parts of the product and
how to get around them.  There are too many of them.  Why not address
the non-intuitive aspects and make the product easier to use?

At 04:59 PM 8/2/2006, Aaron Becar wrote:

End user training is also very important and disclosures and other
documentation should be given to the user so situations do not happen.
To you have training meetings or anything like that?  Documentation
about how it works and what you business process are for TSM should all
be known by the end users.



--
Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tape Drive Choices: What, and why?

2006-08-03 Thread Paul Zarnowski

At 10:36 PM 8/2/2006, Allen S. Rout wrote:

Hi, all.

I'm looking into what choices folks have made for their tape drives,
and why they picked what they did.



We've been using LTO1 and LTO2 and have recently added LTO3.  We've
been happy with the LTO1 and 2.  Too early to tell on LTO3 yet.  We
went with LTO over 359x because of cost.  LTO is much cheaper.  In
the past, we've used DLT (many versions up to DLT8000).  Had tons of
problems with DLT in a TSM environment.  Will never go there
again.  I haven't heard of problems with SDLT, but I'm still raw and
saw no reason to go back to helical technology.  IMHO, the two
technologies deliver similar price-performance, but LTO seems to be
winning market-share and there are more vendors playing in the LTO field.

..Paul



--
Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Cluster backups

2006-08-03 Thread Barnes, Kenny
I would like to pick the brains of anyone backing up Windows clusters
and/or Veritas clusters running on Solaris.  This is something I have
struggled with and cannot get any TSM method to word reliable.  We were
somewhat stable while running on 5.2 server and clients at 5.2.  
 
We are running 5.3.2.3 server on Solaris 9.
Host are at 5.3.2 
 
 
Kenny Barnes
Enterprise Storage Team
GMAC Insurance
336-770-8280
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
Note:  The information contained in this message may be privileged and 
confidential
and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient,
or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended 
recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
communication
is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us 
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.  
Thank you.
--

Re: Tape Drive Choices: What, and why?

2006-08-03 Thread Kelly Lipp
I'll echo Paul's comments with one additional: SDLT is not helical scan,
AIT and SAIT are.  SDLT uses serial serpentine as well, but their basic
technology is different.  LTO3 wins the day from a market share
standpoint, though the newest SDLT have higher capacity at a lower cost
(when you're getting killed in the market, this is what you do...).

I would not even consider AIT or SAIT for TSM.  TSM does too much work
on tapes (compared to other products) for helical scan sanding! 


Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing  CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
719-266-8777
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Zarnowski
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:01 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape Drive Choices: What, and why?

At 10:36 PM 8/2/2006, Allen S. Rout wrote:
Hi, all.

I'm looking into what choices folks have made for their tape drives, 
and why they picked what they did.


We've been using LTO1 and LTO2 and have recently added LTO3.  We've been
happy with the LTO1 and 2.  Too early to tell on LTO3 yet.  We went with
LTO over 359x because of cost.  LTO is much cheaper.  In the past, we've
used DLT (many versions up to DLT8000).  Had tons of problems with DLT
in a TSM environment.  Will never go there again.  I haven't heard of
problems with SDLT, but I'm still raw and saw no reason to go back to
helical technology.  IMHO, the two technologies deliver similar
price-performance, but LTO seems to be winning market-share and there
are more vendors playing in the LTO field.

..Paul



--
Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: crawling system

2006-08-03 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
Don't overlook network causes...where other people in your shop may be
pondering the same problem.
  Richard Sims

I wanted to respond on this and hopefully someone can tell me why this has
happened. What I found, and I did see this about a month ago also, was the
default gateway had changed on the NIC. There is a built in port with an
assigned 10.xxx.xxx.xxx address with a gateway of 10.xxx.xxx.xxx, (Not
connected to the network). The GIG port has a completely different IP and
what I found was the gateway from the other NIC seemed to have taken over.

The first time this happened I forced it back but for whatever reason it
changed back again. I've reconfigured again and both NIC's show the proper
default gateway. Not sure why this would be happening and maybe someone can
shed some light so it won't happen again.

Thanks,

Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: backup schedule question?

2006-08-03 Thread BEYERS Kurt
Joni,
 
How about just creating three schedules that run each week on monday (schedule 
1), wednesday (schedule 2) and friday (schedule 3)?
 
regards,
Kurt
 
 



Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager namens Joni Moyer
Verzonden: do 3/08/2006 19:59
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L] backup schedule question?



Hello Rama,

I don't have the TSM server at 5.3 yet.  I am only at 5.2.7.1, so I don't
believe that that capability is there for my level of TSM code.  Is that
correct?


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Senior Systems Programmer
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Choudarapu, Ramakrishna (GTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
08/03/2006 01:10 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: backup schedule question?






Use SCHEDStyle=Enhanced and DAYofweek=M,W,F

Regards,
Rama

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:51 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] backup schedule question?


Hey Everyone!

I need a backup to run on Monday, Wednesday and Friday only.  If I
create
a backup schedule that starts on a Monday, Period = 2, Period Unit=Days,
Day of Week=weekday will this backup schedule always run on Monday, Wed,
Friday only?  Or will it begin by running on M,W,F and then since Sunday
isn't a weekday it will then run on Tues, Thurs.  of the next week?
Thanks
in advance for your help with this matter!


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Senior Systems Programmer
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain
or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to
this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/



*** Disclaimer ***

Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroep
Auguste Reyerslaan 52, 1043 Brussel

nv van publiek recht
BTW BE 0244.142.664
RPR Brussel
http://www.vrt.be/disclaimer
 


Re: open source clone of tsm?

2006-08-03 Thread Nick Laflamme

Mike wrote:

I have come to like TSM, but I do not have the budget for a 3494 or other tape 
changer, or for the software for that matter.

Does this exist somewhere or someone have a better idea?



A former colleague who is fond of TSM has been known to recommend Amanda
to Linux sites that couldn't afford TSM (or had political issues with
Tivoli). I've never worked with it, and I have no idea how well it
support low-end tape facilities, but it might be worth looking into. I
don't think it's meant to be a clone of TSM, but it seems to address
some of the same issues.

Nick


Re: primary and copy storage pool comparisons

2006-08-03 Thread Whitlock, Brett
query occupancy 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tim Brown
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] primary and copy storage pool comparisons

I thought once I used a command that would compare the primary and copy
storage pools, showing whether or not they are in sync.

Does anyone know of this or am I just mistaken.

Tim Brown
Systems Specialist
Central Hudson Gas  Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255