del volume error

2008-07-08 Thread Robert Ouzen Ouzen
Hi 

 

Tried to delete a volume with the command:   del   vol   72L2
discardd=yes

 

It began to delete but after a few seconds is stuck:

 

Process Process Description  Status

  Number

  
-

  99 Delete VolumeVolume 72L2 (storage pool I-DRM), 
Files

  (Discard Data)   Deleted: 20, Bytes Deleted: 8,572,065

 

I saw in the log this error message:

 

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANR0538I A resource waiter has been aborted.

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANR2229W Discard data process terminated for volume

  72L2 - internal server error detected. (SESSION:

  13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452 issued message 2229 from: 
(SESSION:

  13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452  0x000100013414 outRptf

  (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452  0x0001008aa9c8 
AdmVolDelThread

   (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452  0x0001000148f0 StartThread

  (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452  0x094794f0 
_pthread_body

  (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:06  ANR0986I Process 99 for DELETE VOLUME (DISCARD DATA)

  running in the BACKGROUND processed 20 items for a 
total

more...   (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel)

 

  of 8,572,065 bytes with a completion state of FAILURE 
at

  09:04:06. (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)

 

I did an audit volume with fix=yes  and no problem:

 

07/08/2008 07:59:01  ANR4132I Audit volume process ended for volume 
72L2;

  216127 files inspected, 0 damaged files deleted, 0

  damaged files marked as damaged, 0 files previously

  marked as damaged reset to undamaged, 0 objects 
updated.

  (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 98)

07/08/2008 07:59:01  ANR0987I Process 98 for AUDIT VOLUME (REPAIR) running 
in

  the BACKGROUND processed 216127 items with a 
completion

  state of SUCCESS at 07:59:01. (SESSION: 13490, 
PROCESS:

  98)

 

What can I do to fix and delete this volume to bring it back to scratch 

 

My TSM server version is :  5.5.03

 

Regards

 

Robert Ouzen

 

 


Re: del volume error

2008-07-08 Thread Phillip Burgess
Hi Robert
 
Looks like your suffering from the following apar IC56233
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=1019context=SSSQWCcontext=SSGSG7q1=delete+volume+internal+server+erroruid=swg1IC56233loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en
 
scheduled to be fixed in 5.5.2
 
Phil
 



From: Robert Ouzen Ouzen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/07/2008 07:05
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] del volume error



Hi



Tried to delete a volume with the command:   del   vol   72L2
discardd=yes



It began to delete but after a few seconds is stuck:



Process Process Description  Status

  Number

  
-

  99 Delete VolumeVolume 72L2 (storage pool I-DRM), 
Files

  (Discard Data)   Deleted: 20, Bytes Deleted: 8,572,065



I saw in the log this error message:



07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANR0538I A resource waiter has been aborted.

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANR2229W Discard data process terminated for volume

  72L2 - internal server error detected. (SESSION:

  13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452 issued message 2229 from: 
(SESSION:

  13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452  0x000100013414 outRptf

  (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452  0x0001008aa9c8 
AdmVolDelThread

   (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452  0x0001000148f0 StartThread

  (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:03  ANRD Thread29452  0x094794f0 
_pthread_body

  (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)

07/08/2008 09:04:06  ANR0986I Process 99 for DELETE VOLUME (DISCARD DATA)

  running in the BACKGROUND processed 20 items for a 
total

more...   (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel)



  of 8,572,065 bytes with a completion state of FAILURE 
at

  09:04:06. (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 99)



I did an audit volume with fix=yes  and no problem:



07/08/2008 07:59:01  ANR4132I Audit volume process ended for volume 
72L2;

  216127 files inspected, 0 damaged files deleted, 0

  damaged files marked as damaged, 0 files previously

  marked as damaged reset to undamaged, 0 objects 
updated.

  (SESSION: 13490, PROCESS: 98)

07/08/2008 07:59:01  ANR0987I Process 98 for AUDIT VOLUME (REPAIR) running 
in

  the BACKGROUND processed 216127 items with a 
completion

  state of SUCCESS at 07:59:01. (SESSION: 13490, 
PROCESS:

  98)



What can I do to fix and delete this volume to bring it back to scratch 



My TSM server version is :  5.5.03



Regards



Robert Ouzen


when will 5.5.1 client be released?

2008-07-08 Thread Schaub, Steve
I had expected to see it by now, is there an ETA?

 

Steve Schaub

Systems Engineer, Windows

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee

423-535-6574 (desk)

423-785-7347 (mobile)

 

Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail 
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Re: when will 5.5.1 client be released?

2008-07-08 Thread Laughlin, Lisa
Later on this month.  All of the other clients appear to be released.

thanks!
lisa 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schaub, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] when will 5.5.1 client be released?

I had expected to see it by now, is there an ETA?

 

Steve Schaub

Systems Engineer, Windows

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee

423-535-6574 (desk)

423-785-7347 (mobile)

 

Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
E-mail disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Re: when will 5.5.1 client be released? [mid July?]

2008-07-08 Thread James R Owen

We are currently running an efix dsmserv v5.5.0.3 + testfix for IC56999.
IBM level 2 support told us that v5.5.1 will be delayed about 2 weeks
in order to include the fix for IC56999.  That's very good decision:
IC56999 was a severe performance problem for a busy UNIX TSM service!
Backup performance is back to our normal expectations with the efix.
The v5.5.1 client README files posted near the end of June also talk
about a delay of 2 weeks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   (203.432.6693)

Schaub, Steve wrote:

I had expected to see it by now, is there an ETA?



Steve Schaub

Systems Engineer, Windows

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee

423-535-6574 (desk)

423-785-7347 (mobile)



Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail 
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Re: when will 5.5.1 client be released?

2008-07-08 Thread Phillip Burgess
5.5.1 Fix pack for clients is out
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24019757
 
Windows 5.5.1 client should be out by the end of the month
 
Phil
 



From: Schaub, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/07/2008 16:08
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] when will 5.5.1 client be released?



I had expected to see it by now, is there an ETA?



Steve Schaub

Systems Engineer, Windows

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee

423-535-6574 (desk)

423-785-7347 (mobile)



Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail 
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Re: when will 5.5.1 client be released?

2008-07-08 Thread Timothy Hughes

The 5.5.1 Windows clients will be available in mid-July 2008.

I hope there are some VSS fixes for those clients.

Tim



Laughlin, Lisa wrote:


Later on this month.  All of the other clients appear to be released.

thanks!
lisa

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schaub, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] when will 5.5.1 client be released?

I had expected to see it by now, is there an ETA?



Steve Schaub

Systems Engineer, Windows

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee

423-535-6574 (desk)

423-785-7347 (mobile)



Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
E-mail disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm




Re: when will 5.5.1 client be released?

2008-07-08 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Except for Windows, the 5.5.1 clients are available. Which ones are you
unable to find?

Windows client is currently wrapping up in test, unofficial ETA (subject
to change, not an official announcement, and other caveats apply) is some
time by the end of next week.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
Level 3 Team Lead
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 07/08/2008
08:08:01 AM:

 I had expected to see it by now, is there an ETA?



 Steve Schaub

 Systems Engineer, Windows

 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee

 423-535-6574 (desk)

 423-785-7347 (mobile)



 Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of
 Tennessee E-mail disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Martha McConaghy
We are moving to a new TSM server on a Pseries box with an IBM 3592 tape
system from a very old mainframe based TSM server.  We had not planned on
moving any of the old data over to the new server as there was no requirement
for it.  However, we run into a single user who wants to have all of his
previous backups moved to the new server, even though most are no longer
usable (we are talking about old OS2 systems, etcevery PC he has ever
used in the last 20 years).  Since this user is our 2nd line manager, we have
no choice to try and figure something out.

The main problem is that the two servers are not compatible.  The old server
can only talk to 3590 tape drives, whose tapes are not usable in the new
3592s.  So, I can't just export the data to tape and then import into the
new server. (Ah if only life were that easy!).

On a hunch, I've tried creating a server connection between old and new
TSM server.  Then, I exported a filespace to a virtual volume
(devclass=server) on the new server.  It sits on a 3592 tape right now.
However, the new server will not allow me to import this tape, as it belongs
to a pool and it thinks it is in use.

Is there any way to make this work?  I'm at a loss for ideas at this point.
I could create a virtual volume on disk and move the old filespaces to it,
but then I'll have to keep the old server running forever or at least until
it will run no longer.

Anyone have any ideas?

Martha McConaghy
Strategic Planner/Project Manager
Marist College IT


Re: Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Ribeiro, Ricardo
One idea that you can try is to use the GENERATE BACKUPSET command and
store this media for as long as you want.
That way you can tell him that you have a saved copy of his data then
move him to the new server and it should run a full backup of all his
data anyway onto the new media. My two cents! :) 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Martha McConaghy
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 11:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Tricky conversion problem

We are moving to a new TSM server on a Pseries box with an IBM 3592 tape
system from a very old mainframe based TSM server.  We had not planned
on moving any of the old data over to the new server as there was no
requirement for it.  However, we run into a single user who wants to
have all of his previous backups moved to the new server, even though
most are no longer usable (we are talking about old OS2 systems,
etcevery PC he has ever used in the last 20 years).  Since this user
is our 2nd line manager, we have no choice to try and figure something
out.

The main problem is that the two servers are not compatible.  The old
server can only talk to 3590 tape drives, whose tapes are not usable in
the new 3592s.  So, I can't just export the data to tape and then import
into the new server. (Ah if only life were that easy!).

On a hunch, I've tried creating a server connection between old and new
TSM server.  Then, I exported a filespace to a virtual volume
(devclass=server) on the new server.  It sits on a 3592 tape right now.
However, the new server will not allow me to import this tape, as it
belongs to a pool and it thinks it is in use.

Is there any way to make this work?  I'm at a loss for ideas at this
point.
I could create a virtual volume on disk and move the old filespaces to
it, but then I'll have to keep the old server running forever or at
least until it will run no longer.

Anyone have any ideas?

Martha McConaghy
Strategic Planner/Project Manager
Marist College IT


Re: Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Wanda Prather
Martha,

If the tape is in a stgpool on the target server, that's a GOOD thing.  With
the later versio TSM servers, a server-to server export can be done directly
in 1 step.  The exported data lands in whatever pool is specified by the
appropriate mgmt class/copy group on the target server, and you're done,
you don't have to do the import step.

On the target server, do a q filespace - the data for your exported client
should be where it belongs.  Test a restore to be sure (if you have a client
it can be restored to!)

Wanda

er export, the data lands in the pool according

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Martha McConaghy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We are moving to a new TSM server on a Pseries box with an IBM 3592 tape
 system from a very old mainframe based TSM server.  We had not planned on
 moving any of the old data over to the new server as there was no
 requirement
 for it.  However, we run into a single user who wants to have all of his
 previous backups moved to the new server, even though most are no longer
 usable (we are talking about old OS2 systems, etcevery PC he has ever
 used in the last 20 years).  Since this user is our 2nd line manager, we
 have
 no choice to try and figure something out.

 The main problem is that the two servers are not compatible.  The old
 server
 can only talk to 3590 tape drives, whose tapes are not usable in the new
 3592s.  So, I can't just export the data to tape and then import into the
 new server. (Ah if only life were that easy!).

 On a hunch, I've tried creating a server connection between old and new
 TSM server.  Then, I exported a filespace to a virtual volume
 (devclass=server) on the new server.  It sits on a 3592 tape right now.
 However, the new server will not allow me to import this tape, as it
 belongs
 to a pool and it thinks it is in use.

 Is there any way to make this work?  I'm at a loss for ideas at this point.
 I could create a virtual volume on disk and move the old filespaces to it,
 but then I'll have to keep the old server running forever or at least
 until
 it will run no longer.

 Anyone have any ideas?

 Martha McConaghy
 Strategic Planner/Project Manager
 Marist College IT



Re: Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Stef Coene
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Martha McConaghy wrote:
 On a hunch, I've tried creating a server connection between old and new
 TSM server.  Then, I exported a filespace to a virtual volume
 (devclass=server) on the new server.  It sits on a 3592 tape right now.
 However, the new server will not allow me to import this tape, as it
 belongs to a pool and it thinks it is in use.

 Is there any way to make this work?  I'm at a loss for ideas at this point.
 I could create a virtual volume on disk and move the old filespaces to it,
 but then I'll have to keep the old server running forever or at least
 until it will run no longer.
You can export from server directly to an other server with export node
command.
You have to define a server-to-server connection.  Give the target server a
paswoord (help upd server) and define the server on the source server (help
def server).  And then you can say:

To export client node information and all client files for NODE1 directly to
SERVERB, issue the following command.
Command
 export node node1 filedata=all toserver=serverb

(From help export node)


Stef


Re: Tricky conversion problem

2008-07-08 Thread Len Boyle
Our mvs said that you can buy a used standalone 3590H drive for about $4k.
That might be the simplest way to move the data. After you finish you can sell 
it to someone else.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martha 
McConaghy
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 2:09 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Tricky conversion problem

We are moving to a new TSM server on a Pseries box with an IBM 3592 tape
system from a very old mainframe based TSM server.  We had not planned on
moving any of the old data over to the new server as there was no requirement
for it.  However, we run into a single user who wants to have all of his
previous backups moved to the new server, even though most are no longer
usable (we are talking about old OS2 systems, etcevery PC he has ever
used in the last 20 years).  Since this user is our 2nd line manager, we have
no choice to try and figure something out.

The main problem is that the two servers are not compatible.  The old server
can only talk to 3590 tape drives, whose tapes are not usable in the new
3592s.  So, I can't just export the data to tape and then import into the
new server. (Ah if only life were that easy!).

On a hunch, I've tried creating a server connection between old and new
TSM server.  Then, I exported a filespace to a virtual volume
(devclass=server) on the new server.  It sits on a 3592 tape right now.
However, the new server will not allow me to import this tape, as it belongs
to a pool and it thinks it is in use.

Is there any way to make this work?  I'm at a loss for ideas at this point.
I could create a virtual volume on disk and move the old filespaces to it,
but then I'll have to keep the old server running forever or at least until
it will run no longer.

Anyone have any ideas?

Martha McConaghy
Strategic Planner/Project Manager
Marist College IT