Re: Advantages of having backup by versioning...
Adam, I finished upgrade of WAS on TAM Policy server. It is working fine now. Regards Jozef -- SecurIT BV Overschiestraat 184k 1062 XK AMSTERDAM T +31 (0)20 408 44 27 F +31 (0)20 408 44 25 M +31 (0)65 116 2671 email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] internet: www.securit.biz SecurIT is a Tivoli Premier Business Partner --
Re: BKI5012E: Cannot open TSM API message text file
Ruud, check your message file (if it si not corrupted or some other problem on filesystem level) and if everything is OK, check your LANG environment variable. It should contain the same value as teh name of subdirectory in TSM API directory which contain messages file. Hope this helps Jozef -- SecurIT BV Overschiestraat 184k 1062 XK AMSTERDAM T +31 (0)20 408 44 27 F +31 (0)20 408 44 25 M +31 (0)65 116 2671 email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] internet: www.securit.biz SecurIT is a Tivoli Premier Business Partner -- "Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ITIBHS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 06/20/2005 03:08 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] BKI5012E: Cannot open TSM API message text file Hi recently (it has been working fine) got the following errors : BR229I Calling backup utility... BR278I Command output of '/usr/sap/X60/SYS/exe/run/backint -u X60 -f backup -i /oracle/X60/sapbackup/.adqfhubf.lst -t file -p /oracle/X60/dbs/initX60.utl.brarchive -c': Data Protection for mySAP.com(R) technology Interface between SAPDBA Utilities and Tivoli Storage Manager - Version 3, Release 3, Modification 2 for AIX LF 64-bit - Build: 196J compiled on Jun 5 2003 (c) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1996, 2003, All Rights Reserved. BKI2027I: Using TSM-API version 5.2.0.0 (compiled with 4.2.3.0). BKI2000I: Successfully connected to PROLE on port tdpr3ora64. BKI0005I: Start of program at: Mon Jun 20 14:33:28 2005 . BKI5012E: Cannot open TSM API message text file. Check if DSMI_DIR is set correctly. Current value of DSMI_DIR is: BKI0020I: End of program at: Mon Jun 20 14:33:28 2005 . BKI0021I: Elapsed time: 00 sec . BKI0024I: Return code is: 2. BR280I Time stamp 2005-06-20 14.33.28 BR279E Return code from '/usr/sap/X60/SYS/exe/run/backint -u X60 -f backup -i /oracle/X60/sapbackup/.adqfhubf.lst -t file -p /oracle/X60/dbs/initX60.utl.brarchive -c': 2 anyone any ideas ? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, SAP R/3 Basis Engineer - ITIBHS Shell Information Technology International B.V Room 1A/G03 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Open File (using lvsa) for windows client 5.3.0.0
Hi Steve, here is response to your problem I have found on Tivoli support site: Problem is due to parameters. Disk on which OFS cache is stored MUST be saved with option "Dynamic" (see option include.fs and/or fileleveltype). It's mandatory to specify mode "SNAPSHOT" for all others disks (even if this is the default) when we want to use OFS option. Hereunder is an example for a valid option file : PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE TCPSERVERADDRESS xx SNAPSHOTCACHELOCATION c:\tsmcache\ SNAPSHOTFSIDLEWAIT 0ms TCPNODELAY YES DOMAIN C: D: Include.Fs "C:" FILELEVELTYPE=DYNAMIC Include.Fs "D:" FILELEVELTYPE=SNAPSHOT SNAPSHOTFSIDLEWAIT=0S Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Steve Schaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 02/02/2005 09:41 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Open File (using lvsa) for windows client 5.3.0.0 Anyone out there been successful with this? I have one Win2k client that needs to backup locked files and so far have been unsuccessful getting it to work. I did a clean install of tsm client 5.3.0.0, configured the lvsa, did the required reboot, but the backup still fails over to non-lvsa incremental. I have it running journaled, which works fine, and I can see that tsm has created /tsmlvsacache directories on both the c: and d: drives. I am using remote desktop from xp to access the server, although I have tried using the web gui as well. I even tried pointing the lvsacache dirs to opposite vols in the dsm.opt, but I still get the following errors. Any pointers on how to begin to troubleshoot this would be appreciated. The only reference a search on IBM turned up is referencing 5.2 problems, which is supposedly one of the main fixes included in 5.3. Thanks in advance. dsmerror.log 02/02/2005 12:07:34 ANS1327W The snapshot operation for 'D:\*' failed. Error code: 673. 02/02/2005 12:07:34 ANS1401W The snapshot virtual volume is not accessible. 02/02/2005 12:07:34 ANS1376W Unable to perform operation using a point-in-time copy of the filesystem. The backup/archive operation will continue without snapshot support. 02/02/2005 12:07:38 ANS1327W The snapshot operation for 'C:\*' failed. Error code: 673. 02/02/2005 12:07:38 ANS1401W The snapshot virtual volume is not accessible. 02/02/2005 12:07:39 ANS1376W Unable to perform operation using a point-in-time copy of the filesystem. The backup/archive operation will continue without snapshot support. dsm.opt * * Communication Section * commmethod TCPIP tcpport1500 tcpserveraddress 10.64.1.43 tcpbuffsize31 tcpwindowsize 63 largecommbuffers Yes httpport 1581 * * Workstation Settings Section * passwordaccess generate managedserviceswebclient schedule errorlogretention 90 schedlogretention 14 passwordaccess generate snapshotfsidlewait 1s 100ms snapshotcachelocation d:\ include.fs d: snapshotcachelocation=c:\ Steve Schaub Computer Storage Systems Engineer II Haworth, Inc 616-393-1457 (desk) 616-886-8821 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Trials are inevitable. We can curse them and grow bitter, or harvest them and grow stronger" ForwardSourceID:NT00056AB2
Re: Backing up Domino logged databases
Bill, after switching logging in Domino to any type (circular or archive), incremental backup process only databases for which DBIID changed or which were deleted (inactivation in TSM). You have to use combination of incremental and selective backup now, i.e. daily selective and once pre week incremental. Hope this helps. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Bill Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 01/25/2005 01:55 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Backing up Domino logged databases If I run an INCREMENTAL * backup nightly and the Domino admin turns on circular logging, does that INCREMENTAL still function the way it did, or does it now switch over and not back up the database becuase is it "logged" even though it is circular logging and I can't archive those logs? I have a client that has been running the INCREMENTAL now for years and last fall the Domino admin turned on circular logging. Now the nightly incremental only does a handful of databases. Bill Boyer "An Optimist is just a pessimist with no job experience." - Scott Adams ForwardSourceID:NT0005644A
Re: TDP for Domino problem
(2104): Exit DDsmApi::ddsmGetNextQObj(), rc = 122 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : dsmapi.cpp ( 588): Enter DDsmApi::AgtDsmRCMsg() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : dsmapi.cpp (2300): Enter DDsmApi::ddsmRCMsg() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 177): Enter DBaseApi::StartApiCall() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 182): Exit DBaseApi::StartApiCall() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 195): Enter DBaseApi::EndApiCall() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 290): Enter DBaseApi::GetApiName() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 294): Exit DBaseApi::GetApiName(), returning api name TSM 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 221): Exit DBaseApi::EndApiCall(), elapsed milliseconds 0, total time 472 for TSM Apis 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : dsmapi.cpp (2308): Exit DDsmApi::ddsmRCMsg(), rc = 0 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : dsmapi.cpp ( 609): Exit DDsmApi::AgtDsmRCMsg() rc = 0 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : dsmqberi.cpp( 512): dsmGetNextQObj returned with 418 on a q backup for filespace SKMail2.DOMDBS object \*\* 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : dsmapi.cpp (2013): Enter DDsmApi::ddsmEndQuery() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 177): Enter DBaseApi::StartApiCall() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 182): Exit DBaseApi::StartApiCall() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 195): Enter DBaseApi::EndApiCall() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 290): Enter DBaseApi::GetApiName() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 294): Exit DBaseApi::GetApiName(), returning api name TSM 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 221): Exit DBaseApi::EndApiCall(), elapsed milliseconds 0, total time 472 for TSM Apis 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmapi.cpp (2020): Exit DDsmApi::ddsmEndQuery(), rc = 0 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmqberi.cpp( 603): Exit DDsmQueryBackupEri::ProcessReqestDetails(), rc = 418 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmqferi.cpp( 210): Enter & Exit DDsmQueryFilespaceEri::~DDsmQueryFilespaceEri() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmqeri.cpp ( 293): Enter DDsmQueryEri::~DDsmQueryEri() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmqeri.cpp ( 301): Exit DDsmQueryEri::~DDsmQueryEri() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : baseeri.cpp ( 149): Enter & Exit DBaseEri::~DBaseEri() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : domqberi.cpp(1599): ADSM specific object information: According to manuals, RC 122 unknown format of file, and for RC 418, there is no description in manual, and in return codes source file is following description: #define DSM_RC_OPT_CLIENT_DOES_NOT_WANT 418/* Client doesn?t want this value*/ /* from the server What does this mean? I suspect that there is some problem with one or more entries in TSM DB. Will audit DB help to resolve this problem? Is it possible to remove specific entry from TSM database? Any help is appreciated. Best regards ------ Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: TSM 5.2, Solaris 8 w/ STK L700 9940B drive
Thomas, it is my understanding that TSM device driver does not support FC connection to devices. You have to have SCSI connection to drives. In your case it means, that you have to have FC HBA, which present SCSI interface to host system (Solaris). In your mt.conf file you have to use fo "parent" parameter value SCSI. But I am not sure if this is true also in 5.2. Hope this helps Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 "Schulz, Thomas (K-GOI-1/2)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 01/10/2005 05:19 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject TSM 5.2, Solaris 8 w/ STK L700 9940B drive Hi Guys, Currently I'm having problem configuring TSM mt driver on Solaris 8 with STK 9940B tape drive. I tried many different mt.conf configuration but I still got the following error: # add_drv -v /usr/kernel/drv/mt exit status = 0 devfsadm: driver failed to attach: mt exit status = 11 Warning: Driver (mt) successfully added to system but failed to attach Driver (mt) installed. Following is the configuration that I have been tried: name="mt" parent="fp" target="0" lun="0" fc-port-wwn="500104f101782200" name="mt" parent="pseudo" instance=16383 [EMAIL PROTECTED] # luxadm display /dev/rmt/6n DEVICE PROPERTIES for tape: /dev/rmt/6n Vendor: STK Product ID: 9840 Revision: 0198 Serial Num: 000992201053 Device Type: Tape device Path(s): /dev/rmt/6n /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2000/SUNW,[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5:n LUN path port WWN: 500104f101782200 Host controller port WWN: 210100e08b36c0fc Path status:Not Ready = IO Cards = Bus Freq Brd Type MHz Slot Name Model --- -- SYS PCI33 4 SUNW,ifp-pciclass, SYS PCI66 5 SUNW,qlc-pciclass,0c040x10a SYS PCI33 7 scsi-pciclass,001000 Symbios,53C875 No failures found in System === [EMAIL PROTECTED] # cfgadm -al Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant Condition c6::500104f101782200 tape connectedconfigured unknown c6::500104f101783200 tape connectedconfigured unknown How can I fix this problem? Please help! Thanks, Thomas ForwardSourceID:NT0005576E
TDP for Domino problem
/06/2005 12:43:35.077 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 294): Exit DBaseApi::GetApiName(), returning api name TSM 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : baseapi.cpp ( 221): Exit DBaseApi::EndApiCall(), elapsed milliseconds 0, total time 472 for TSM Apis 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmapi.cpp (2020): Exit DDsmApi::ddsmEndQuery(), rc = 0 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmqberi.cpp( 603): Exit DDsmQueryBackupEri::ProcessReqestDetails(), rc = 418 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmqferi.cpp( 210): Enter & Exit DDsmQueryFilespaceEri::~DDsmQueryFilespaceEri() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmqeri.cpp ( 293): Enter DDsmQueryEri::~DDsmQueryEri() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : dsmqeri.cpp ( 301): Exit DDsmQueryEri::~DDsmQueryEri() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : baseeri.cpp ( 149): Enter & Exit DBaseEri::~DBaseEri() 01/06/2005 12:43:35.093 [5548] : domqberi.cpp(1599): ADSM specific object information: According to manuals, RC 122 unknown format of file, and for RC 418, there is no description in manual, and in return codes source file is following description: #define DSM_RC_OPT_CLIENT_DOES_NOT_WANT 418/* Client doesnât want this value*/ /* from the server What does this mean? I suspect that there is some problem with one or more entries in TSM DB. Will audit DB help to resolve this problem? Is it possible to remove specific entry from TSM database? Any help is appreciated. Best regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: Scheduler problem
Timothy, what was the result from this schedule for today (12/15/04)? Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Timothy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/15/2004 01:43 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Scheduler problem Hi Jozef, The time should have said 2/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Server Window Start: 00:00:01 on 12/15/04 Instead it said 2/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Server Window Start: 00:00:01 on 12/16/04 The two backup's that displayed this did not backup last night! (12/15) they will probably backup tonight. They are both displaying 2/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Server Window Start: 00:00:01 on 12/16/04 Which is the correct date now! Thanks Jozef Zatko wrote: > Timoty, > time specified in schedule, which is one second after midnight already was > (I mean today 12/15). Next one second after midnight will be on 16th. > Right? > > Regards > > Ing. Jozef Zatko > Login a.s. > Dlha 2, Stupava > tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 > > Timothy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 12/14/2004 05:48 PM > > Please respond to > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc > > Subject > Scheduler problem > > Hello, > > I checked the DSMcad and it shows the next scheduled operation is for > 12/16/04 it should say 12/15/04. > > I killed the DSMCAD and restarted it, But it shows the next backup > schedule 12/16/04. These backups runs everynight. I need to get > this backup ready for 12/15/04. > > Anyone every have this problem with the schedule showing > the wrong date? This is happening on the two Backup sessions that > I cancelled this morning. > > AIX client 5.1.5 > TSM 5.2.3.5 > > Thanks for any help! > > $ tail dsmwebcl.log > Executing scheduled command now. > 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Next operation scheduled: > 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) > > 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Schedule Name: MIDNIGHT > 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Action:Incremental > 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Objects: > 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Options: > 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Server Window Start: 00:00:01 on 12/16/04 > > 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) > > 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Waiting to be contacted by the server. > ForwardSourceID:NT000549D6 ForwardSourceID:NT00054A96
Re: Scheduler problem
Timoty, time specified in schedule, which is one second after midnight already was (I mean today 12/15). Next one second after midnight will be on 16th. Right? Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Timothy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/14/2004 05:48 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Scheduler problem Hello, I checked the DSMcad and it shows the next scheduled operation is for 12/16/04 it should say 12/15/04. I killed the DSMCAD and restarted it, But it shows the next backup schedule 12/16/04. These backups runs everynight. I need to get this backup ready for 12/15/04. Anyone every have this problem with the schedule showing the wrong date? This is happening on the two Backup sessions that I cancelled this morning. AIX client 5.1.5 TSM 5.2.3.5 Thanks for any help! $ tail dsmwebcl.log Executing scheduled command now. 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Next operation scheduled: 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Schedule Name: MIDNIGHT 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Action:Incremental 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Objects: 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Options: 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Server Window Start: 00:00:01 on 12/16/04 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) 12/14/04 11:26:34 (dsmcad) Waiting to be contacted by the server. ForwardSourceID:NT000549D6
Re: Admin command line problem - solved
Andy, that was it. I had badly setup my locale environment variable (LANG). Thanx and best regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/01/2004 02:20 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Admin command line problem The admin CLI -DATAONLY option is platform neutral. Thus it doesn't matter on which OS you run the admin; it should work. Check your enUS/dsmclientV3.cat file and make sure it's modification time matches that of the dsmadmc module. If you continue to have trouble with this option, contact IBM technical support. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/01/2004 02:29:55: > Hi fellows, > I have strange problem with administrative command line - dsmadmc. > > According to manual, from version 5.2 there is a new option -dataonly=yes. > This option is working on my Windows client (version 5.2.0.6), but not on > my AIX > client. On my AIX 5.1 system, I have TSM server 5.2.2.5 and TSM client > 5.2.3.0 (64bit). > Following is output I get when I try to use dataonly option: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root/# dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=xxx -dataonly=yes q vol > ANS8017E Command line parameter 3: 'dataonly=yes' is not valid. > > ANS8002I Highest return code was 9. > > According to manual, this option is supported on AIX. Any thoughts? > > Best regards > > Ing. Jozef Zatko > Login a.s. > Dlha 2, Stupava > tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 ForwardSourceID:NT00054116
Re: Admin command line problem
But there are (at least I am no aware of any) no admin client instalation files. I have just baclient and api client. And when I start admin client I see following message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr# dsmadmc Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Administrative Interface - Version 5, Release 2, Level 3.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2004 All Rights Reserved. Enter your user id: I believe that for Unix is admin client installed automaticaly as part of baclient installation. Right? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Steve Schaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/01/2004 12:30 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Admin command line problem Sounds like your baclient is up to date on AIX, but not the admin client (they are different). -Original Message- From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Admin command line problem Hi fellows, I have strange problem with administrative command line - dsmadmc. According to manual, from version 5.2 there is a new option -dataonly=yes. This option is working on my Windows client (version 5.2.0.6), but not on my AIX client. On my AIX 5.1 system, I have TSM server 5.2.2.5 and TSM client 5.2.3.0 (64bit). Following is output I get when I try to use dataonly option: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root/# dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=xxx -dataonly=yes q vol ANS8017E Command line parameter 3: 'dataonly=yes' is not valid. ANS8002I Highest return code was 9. According to manual, this option is supported on AIX. Any thoughts? Best regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 ForwardSourceID:NT000540E2
Admin command line problem
Hi fellows, I have strange problem with administrative command line - dsmadmc. According to manual, from version 5.2 there is a new option -dataonly=yes. This option is working on my Windows client (version 5.2.0.6), but not on my AIX client. On my AIX 5.1 system, I have TSM server 5.2.2.5 and TSM client 5.2.3.0 (64bit). Following is output I get when I try to use dataonly option: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root/# dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=xxx -dataonly=yes q vol ANS8017E Command line parameter 3: 'dataonly=yes' is not valid. ANS8002I Highest return code was 9. According to manual, this option is supported on AIX. Any thoughts? Best regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: Running INTEL machine through firewall
Eric, see APAR IC42006. It should be corrected in TSM server 5.2.3.0. Best regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 "Jones, Eric J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/04/2004 08:56 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Running INTEL machine through firewall Good Afternoon. I have everything setup for my INTEL machine running Win2K(TSM 5.2) to backup to my TSM server(AIX 5.2, TSM 5.22) and I kicked off the scheduled backup. The client sits behind a firewall with port 6150 open in 1 direction(server to client). The server contacts the client but in the error log of the client I'm receiving === Client TSM error log. 11/04/2004 14:33:16 ReadPswdFromRegistry(): RegOpenPathEx(): Win32 RC=2 . 11/04/2004 14:33:16 ReadPswdFromRegistry(): getRegValue(): Win32 RC=2 . 11/04/2004 14:33:16 sessOpen: Error 137 from signon authentication. === OPT File - Key items tcpport 6150 SCHEDMODE PROMPTED SCHEDLOGRETENTION 60 S TCPNODELAY YES TCPWINDOWSIZE 63 PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE SESSIONINITIATION serveronly === I went through the wizard and put the password in when it came to that screen. It's the same password as the password I had set on the server. The server keeps connecting to the client and the client keeps putting out the same error. I'm not sure how to get them to sync up so the backups take place. Thanks Eric -Original Message- From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:44 AM To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Cc: Jones, Eric J; Prather, Wanda Subject: RE: Running INTEL machine through firewall I'm not sure this is documented anywhere, but I could only get a Windows machine to work with ServerOnly If I also set SCHEDMODE to PROMPTED. In dsm.opt: sessioninitiation serveronly schedmodeprompted The password issue: The password is not "generated" the first time. When you registered the client to the server, you assigned it a password. To set up the scheduler on the INTEL client, start the GUI client, from the top menu pull down Utilites -> Setup Wizard. Check "help me configure the scheduler". Walk through the wizard; the wizard installs the scheduler as a Windows Service (like an AIX daemon that is defined in /etc/inittab). - For the "scheduler name", type in "TSM SCHEDULER", or something similarly descriptive. - one of the items you will be asked for is the password. The password gets encrypted and saved in the registry so that the scheduler can contact the TSM server. - you will also be asked for the port, the server TCP/IP address, etc. -When you are asked about the log file names, include/exclude, just take the defaults. -The only non-obvious thing: when you get to the step in the Wizard that asks for "service login options", leave the box checked that says "system", but change startup from Manual to "AUTOMATIC". After you check FINISH, the service should be started (go to Start -> Settings -> Control Panel -> Admin tools -> Services, look for TSM Scheduler). Check the dsmsched.log file to make sure you get the "waiting for server to contact" message, and you are good to go. The next time the password expires, the server will "generate" a new one and pass it down to the client. Hope that helps... Wanda Prather "I/O, I/O, It's all about I/O" -(me) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jones, Eric J Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Running INTEL machine through firewall Good Afternoon. I'm running TSM 5.2.2 server on an AIX machine running AIX 5.2. I have a UNIX machine behind the firewall which I currently backup over port 6150 without a problem using "ServerInitiated Backups". The Passwordaccess is set to generate. To setup the UNIX machine the 1st time I went to the command line(on client), typed dsmc, kickoff the scheduled backup from the server and it prompted for the password. I entered the PW and the backup took off. After the 1st time it(password entered) the backups run each day with no intervention. The firewall has only port 6150 open in 1 direction(server to client). How do you setup an INTEL machine with "ServerOnly", server initiated backups? On the server I have the client setup with the following == Session Initiation ServerOnly HLADDRESS 158.187.101.99 LLADDRESS 6150 = On the client do I need to add a line
Re: NAS Storage for Copypools
Stefan, check that user under which your TSM server is running can see and access your shared drive. If you run TSM under system user, this user by default does not have access to network shares. Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Stefan Holzwarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/18/2004 04:01 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject NAS Storage for Copypools Hi, i thought a simple question but Can you use networkshares for storagepools? I tried devclass file, but got an error about ANS8000I Server command: 'define devc FILEDEV1 devtype=FILE directory="Y:\" mountl=32 maxcap=25M' ANR8366E DEFINE DEVCLASS: Invalid value for DIRECTORY parameter. Y: is a networkshare on a large NAS Box (Sharerights and acl's are ok) I think about a configuration for copypools that use distributed non used space... Kind Regards Stefan Holzwarth ForwardSourceID:NT00051F76
Sending TDPD events to TEC
Hello guys, for monitoring of Domino backups I need to send TDPD messages (ACD52xx) to TEC (tivoli receiver). When I use enable event command on TSM server, I get following error message: tsm: TSM>enable event tivoli ACD5202 ANR1801E ENABLE EVENTS: Invalid event or event class - ACD5202 According to TDPD documentation, messages labeled "Centrally logged" are sent to TSM server and then they can be sent to specified event receiver. Following is one paragraf from TDPD manual: Several of the Data Protection for Domino messages are sent to the Storage Manager Server so that execution of the Data Protection for Domino can be centrally monitored. Specifically, those messages labeled Centrally logged can be sent to the Storage Manager Server. The centrally logged messages are in the range ACD5200 through ACD5299 but not all messages in that range are sent to the server. The Storage Manager Server then has the ability to route these messages to several different .receivers. which include the server activity log, the server console and other external monitoring facilities such as SNMP and the Tivoli/Enterprise Console (T/EC). The Storage Manager Server command enable events is used to control which receivers get the Data Protection for Domino messages. Also, the receivers provide an ability to filter which messages are actually processed. Some receivers provide filtering based on message severity while others (such as the T/EC receiver) allow filtering on individual message numbers. In TSM server refference manual I found following text in description of enable event command: event_name A four-digit message number preceded by ANR for a server event or ANE for a client event. Valid ranges are from ANR0001 to ANR and from ANE4000 to ANE4999. Specify the NODENAME parameter if client events are to be enabled for matching nodes. Specify the SERVERNAME parameter if server events are to be enabled for matching servers. For the TIVOLI event receiver, you can specify the following additional ranges for the Tivoli Storage Manager application clients: Tivoli Storage ManagerApplication Client Prefix Range Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange ServerACN 3500â3649 Data Protection for Lotus Domino ACD 5200â5299 Data Protection for Oracle ANS 500â599 Data Protection for Informix ANS 600â699 Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server ACO 3000â3999 Notes: 1. The application client must have enhanced Tivoli Event Console support enabled in order to route the above messages to the Tivoli Event Console. 2. Specifying the ALL option enables these messages. However, the INFO, WARNING, ERROR, and SEVERE options have no effect on the messages. 3. Because of the number of messages, you should not enable all messages from a node to be logged to the Tivoli Event Console. Does somebody know, what does it mean "enhanced Tivoli Event Console support enabled"? I found no information about this on IBM site, nor on ADSM.org. TSM server: 5.2.2.5 on AIX 5.1 TDPD 5.1.5 on Windows Thanks in advance Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: Tivoli or Notes Problem ?
Hi Bill, when you issue those commands, are you directly on server with TDP or use terminal connection? You can not use terminal connection when using TDP for Domino. This is true for command line client and also for GUI. Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Bill Dourado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 15.07.2004 09:54 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Tivoli or Notes Problem ? Hi , Has body any experienced the following :- From TDP for Domino command line > DOMDSMC QUERY ADSM Response :- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Lotus Domino Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.01 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2002. All rights reserved. ACD5221I The C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\domino\domdsm.log log file has been pruned successfully. Tivoli Storage Manager Server Connection Information Nodename ... S2321_DOMINO NetWork Host Name of Server TSM1.ALSTEC.COM TSM API Version Version 5, Release 2, Level 2 Server Name TSM1 Server Type Windows Server Version . Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0 Compression Mode ... OFF Domain Name DOMINO Active Policy Set .. DOMINO Default Management Class ... STD Which is OK DOMDSMC QUERY DBBACKUP MAIL\ianbrown.nsf /INACTIVE Fails miserabley : PANIC: Unable to complete restart processing. Any help would be appreciated . T.I.A Bill IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Lotus Domino Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.01 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2002. All rights reserved. comp = 11, fnc = 81, probeid = 79, errcode = 5010, extsympt = Unexpected internal error returned to logger: 0x20762010 Logger Failure: Func=hlgStartLog RC=0x2010 File=rm\rmrest.cpp:828 Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\web.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\T1 Operator Reports.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\statrep.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\ShipReqSys.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\PersonInfo.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\Nuclear\Hoping 1034-02-001.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\names.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\names-AG-EXTERNAL.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mtdata\mtstore.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\MSR.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\McAfee\GSD53_Quarantine.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\McAfee\GSD53_Log.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\McAfee\GSD53_Config.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\Mail52eFile.ntf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\zenonjazwinski.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\wilfblackwell.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\tonywynn-williams.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\tonyleverton.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\tonylee.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\tonygarbett.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\timwren.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\timmarshall.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\testuser6.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\testuser4.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\terryattwood.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\sueshaw.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\stevewestwood.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\stevewebb.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\stevenwhitehorn.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\stevehaines.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\stancross.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\simoncooper.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\shippingdept.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\sandrahealey.nsf Recovery Manager: Unable to recover DB D:\Lotus\Domino\Data\mail\ronspinks.nsf Recovery Manager: Unabl
Re: Restore TSM database
Abdullah, correct name for parameter dbvol is vol. So your command should look like this: "dsmserv restore db devclass=DISK-TMP vol=/ldb/84849157.dbb commit=yes" Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Richard van Denzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18.05.2004 11:22 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Restore TSM database What does your Volume History look like (the file) for the DBBACKUP? Richard. "Abdullah, Md-Zaini B BSP-IMI/42" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18-05-2004 11:15 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Restore TSM database Hello TSM guru, Normally, I did a tsm db backup to tape and managed to restore the database. And also I have done tsm db backup to file devices class onto filesystem eg. /ldb. It created the file /ldb/808454.dbb. But how to restore ? I tried the following command to restore but not successful. "dsmserv restore db devclass=DISK-TMP dbvol=/ldb/84849157.dbb commit=yes" Anybody, who have experience please help... This is the devconfig of the current set-up. # # cat devconfig /* Device Configuration */ DEFINE DEVCLASS 3584DEV DEVTYPE=LTO FORMAT=ULTRIUM2 ESTCAPACITY=209715200K MOUNTLIMIT=DRIVES MOUNTWAIT=60 MOUNTRETENTION=60 PREFIX=ADSM LIBRARY=3584LIB DEFINE DEVCLASS DISK-TMP DEVTYPE=FILE FORMAT=DRIVE MAXCAPACITY=3788800K MOUNTLIMIT=1 DIRECTORY=/ldb SHARED=NO SET SERVERNAME TSM DEFINE LIBRARY 3584LIB LIBTYPE=SCSI SERIAL="000139860401" SHARED=NO DEFINE LIBRARY DISK_LIB LIBTYPE=FILE DEFINE DRIVE 3584LIB 3584DRV1 ELEMENT=258 ONLINE=Yes SERIAL="9100600016" DEFINE DRIVE DISK_LIB DISK_TMP ONLINE=Yes /* LIBRARYINVENTORY SCSI 3584LIB A2 1110 101*/ /* LIBRARYINVENTORY SCSI 3584LIB A3 1041 101*/ # # Regards, zaini
Re: How to block tape drive?
Arnaud, thank you very much. It helped. Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
How to block tape drive?
Hello guys, can somebody help me with following problem? I need to backup Oracle database (many of them) using b/a TSM client by putting Oracle into backup mode and backup all Oracle data files. Because of activity on Oracle database, before putting Oracle database into backup mode, I need to be sure that I have available tape drive for backup (backup will be done LAN-free using TSM STA). My idea is to use script, which will select empty (or available, ie. loaded but not used - idle) drives from drives table using select command and then put one of them to offline until I have Oracle in backup mode, and then put this drive back to online just before backup starts. My problem is that from drives table it is not possible to get enough information about state and activity of the drive. There is only information whether drive is loaded or not. Using "q mount" command I can get also information whether drive is "in use" or "idle". Is it possible to get this information also using some select command? Or any other ideas? Many thanks Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: Using more than one utility to backup Informix
Willem, Arnaud thank you very much for your help and very good explanation of topic I was interesting in. Now I am clear about it. Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Using more than one utility to backup Informix
Hello guys, I have one quick (hope easy) question about backing up Informix databases. Is it safe to use two different backup tools independently to backup Informix data? I have Informix server, which was backed up using Ontape. Recently we implemented TDP for Informix and started to use onbar. But Informix admin still wants (at least for some time ) to use also Ontape. I am not sure how these backup utilities manage Informix logs. Isn't it possible that Ontape during its backup will backup also some logs which will not then be backed up by onbar (will be marked as archived)? Is it possible that later restore using onbar will not be done correctly because of this? My version of Informix is 7.31UC3 Thanks Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: Problem with tdp oracle
Hi, check the value of your LANG environment variable. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 AMHOUCHE Youssef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08.12.2003 17:05 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Problem with tdp oracle Hi After installin tdp oracle release 5.1.5 on AIX 64bit with in a TSM server 5 environement; i receive a error message when i enter the following command : > tdpoconf Password > error is : rc=406 ,dsmRCMsg error rc = 610 Unable to open message text file Please help me to work arround this problem Best regards Youssef * Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration. La SOCIETE GENERALE et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au titre de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. *
Re: Multiple backup of a file that doesn't change?
Hi Flemming, this could be easily done by selective backup of this file by somebody after normal incremental backup. Using selective backup you can backup file as many times as you want. During selective backup TSM client does not check if file was changed or not. Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Flemming Hougaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 30.07.2003 10:28 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Multiple backup of a file that doesn't change? Hi all First of all... I'm not drunk, on drugs or anything like that - only a severe headache I have a NetWare 5.1 SP3 (I know it's old...), TSA5UP12 is applied, TSM Client 5.1.6.0 - and running a normal scheduled incremental backup every night... and still I've a screendump in front of me where I can read the following: Opticut.exe (active), Modified: 01-12-1999 15:27:12, Created: 08-06-2001 18:19:25, Backed Up: 28-07-2003 21:15:17 Opticut.exe (inactive), Modified: 01-12-1999 15:27:12, Created: 08-06-2001 18:19:25, Backed Up: 25-07-2003 03:31:21 How can this happen Regards Flemming -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Jack Magill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 29. juli 2003 04:59 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: High Utilization on Netware Server Compression will not help in this case, since all compression must be done and undone by the clients cpu, this will put more load and the novell server and not alieviate it as you might think. What are the sizes of the files being backed up (in general)? What is the size of the cpu that is being used on the server? How much ram is available? and last but not least what are the comm buffer settings on the client? Jack > > From: Anwer Adil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2003/07/27 Sun AM 06:21:49 EDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: High Utilization on Netware Server > > I recently upgraded a couple of my servers to Netware 6. During backup, the > processor utilization pegs at 100%. The tsm client version on the servers > is Version 5 Release 1, Level 0. Compression on all the volumes is off > therefore I have the following settings in the dsm.opt file: > > COMPRESSION YES > COMPRESSALWAYS NO > > Please help. >
Re: TDP for Domino - expiration
Del, thank you for your explanation. I was unsure about this an need to calculate required space in storage pool for Domino backup. Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Del Hoobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01.07.2003 19:41 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: TDP for Domino - expiration Jozef, This is normal TSM policy management. If you have VEREXISTS set to 2, when you take the 3rd full backup, the oldest inactive copy will be deleted when the next expiration process is run. Thanks, Del > I have one question about data expiration for which I can not find clear > answer in doc. > When I have lets say 30GB of Domino databases and I set up backup policy > to have two versions of data. > I backup databases every day and all databases are changing daily (so all > databases are backed up every day - I now, time for transaction logging). > On first day I get active version of all databases, on second day I get > new active version and version from first day becomes inactive. And now my > question. > When does oldest inactive version expire? It expires during backup on > thirsth day or I have to run expire inventory after backup to free space > taken by expired data? > I need to know how much data space I need in storage pool to hold the > backed up data - two timesor three times the amount of backed up data.
TDP for Domino - expiration
Helo guys, I have one question about data expiration for which I can not find clear answer in doc. When I have lets say 30GB of Domino databases and I set up backup policy to have two versions of data. I backup databases every day and all databases are changing daily (so all databases are backed up every day - I now, time for transaction logging). On first day I get active version of all databases, on second day I get new active version and version from first day becomes inactive. And now my question. When does oldest inactive version expire? It expires during backup on thirsth day or I have to run expire inventory after backup to free space taken by expired data? I need to know how much data space I need in storage pool to hold the backed up data - two timesor three times the amount of backed up data. Thank you very much Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: lotus tdp install problems
Michelle, I bet you installed patch 1.1.2 for TDP for Domino without previous instaling of base TDPD version from CD. This patch does not include correct licence file. You have to install base version of TDP for Domino first (TDPD 1.1) and then you can instal TDPD 1.1.2 patch. Or better, ask for latest 5.1.5 version of TDPD. Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 adsm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18.06.2003 16:26 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject lotus tdp install problems hi all, first tsmserver 4.2 client aix4.3 with tsm 4.2 Im trying to install tdp for domino on this client, this is the message i get; De volgende melding krijg ik bij het opstarten van domdsmc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cd /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/domino/bin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/domino/bin# ./domdsmc Tivoli Storage Manager Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1, Level 2.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2001. All rights reserved. ACD0053E License file (/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/domino/bin/domclient.lic) could not be opened. on the tsm server are 5 licenses present, of which none has been used. does anyone have a clue? thnx! michelle
Re: Interesting LTO fault's symptom
drive firmware level - 25D4 IBM LTO tapes Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Bob Booth - UIUC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16.06.2003 16:02 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Interesting LTO fault's symptom Could any of you supply your drive firmware level, so we can all compare notes? thanks, bob On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:57:47PM +0200, Tom?? Hrouda Ing. wrote: > We have it on both IBM and Imation tapes (we had first 20 tapes in initial > order with library from IBM and 20 Imation tapes bought 1/2 year later). > Fault tapes are mixed. > > Tomas > > > -Original Message- > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC > > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:13 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Interesting LTO fault's symptom > > > > > > Hi, > > > > we have exactly the same problem, about 2 -3 tapes / day with write error, > > 2/3 of capacity. Only on Imation tapes, not on IBM ones... > > > > We spend our time to do MOVE DATA ! . . .
Re: Interesting LTO fault's symptom
Hi all, we are using 3583 LTO library with two LTO drives for 5 or 6 months. No error on tapes until now. Interesting findings. If some error occur with tapes I will check more detaily. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 "Tomáš Hrouda Ing." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16.06.2003 14:14 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Interesting LTO fault's symptom Hi all, during last weeks I did interesting findings at one of production LTO 3583-L18 library. There are 2 drives and both was changed past series of media faults (one of them twice) past about 1 year of operation. We have about 20 "historicaly touched" tapes with average 3-4 write faults. Media faults are still repeated and my finding is all that faults were done at 70-75% of estimated capacity (set by longterm using to 105GB, we use client compression) during filling the tape. It seems like all tapes were corrupted nearly at the same place, of course there is some diffusion because this is only estimated filling. Faults at these tapes are repeatedly occured at these percents of max capacity. I understand when one tape has media fault repeatedly at the same place, but about 20 tapes? Could it mean that all tapes were corrupted by one bad drive at the same place, or can be reason at microcode? We are in contact with our IBM support to solve it, but I am interested if anybody of you register similar phenomenon? Tomas
Re: tdp for domino problem, which user ID for backup?
I want thank to all who responded to my request. It was very helpfull since I did not know it is known bug. Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 "LeBlanc, Patricia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UTUAL.COM>cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Re: tdp for domino problem, which user ID for backup? Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02.04.2003 14:07 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I ran into the same problem. This is documented in the knowledge base as a known error. If you run the domino server as a windows app instead of a service, this works around the problem. -----Original Message- From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 2:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tdp for domino problem, which user ID for backup? Hello TSM-ers, two or three weeks ago I asked list to help me with Domino backup. The problem was that, when I used TDP GUI or command line for backup I always got couple of the following error messages for various databases: 04/02/2003 08:38:53 Backup of admin4.nsf failed. 04/02/2003 08:38:53 This database is currently being used by someone else. In order to share a Notes database, all users must use a Domino Server instead of a File Server. I have done some tests and I found out one interesting thing. Succesfull backup of some Domino databases (especialy system databases like names.nsf, admin4.nsf and so on) depends on user ID under which domdsmc or TDP for Domino GUI is running. My environment is as follows: Domino 6.0 on Windows 2000 SP3 running as service under Local system user TDP for Domino 5.1.5, TSM client 5.1.5.4 TSM server 5.1.5.4 on AIX 5.1 When I used domdsmc or TDP GUI as user Administrator, I always got error messages like the one above for some of databases. Databases for which I got this error were not always the same. Sometimes some of databases was backed up succesfuly, sometimes not. When I run domdsmc via TSM scheduler, which is running under Local system user ID, all databases was backed up without errors. When I stoped Domino server and started it in foreground using Administrator ID, I could sucessfuly backup all databases with TDP GUI and also with domdsmc (using Administrator ID). So it seems that it depends on user ID, under which is Domino server running and also user ID under which is TDP for Domino running. When standard Domino instalation procedure is used, Domino server will run as service with Local system user ID and then you can not backup all databases corectly using TDP GUI or command line. Is it working as designed or is it bug? Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
tdp for domino problem, which user ID for backup?
Hello TSM-ers, two or three weeks ago I asked list to help me with Domino backup. The problem was that, when I used TDP GUI or command line for backup I always got couple of the following error messages for various databases: 04/02/2003 08:38:53 Backup of admin4.nsf failed. 04/02/2003 08:38:53 This database is currently being used by someone else. In order to share a Notes database, all users must use a Domino Server instead of a File Server. I have done some tests and I found out one interesting thing. Succesfull backup of some Domino databases (especialy system databases like names.nsf, admin4.nsf and so on) depends on user ID under which domdsmc or TDP for Domino GUI is running. My environment is as follows: Domino 6.0 on Windows 2000 SP3 running as service under Local system user TDP for Domino 5.1.5, TSM client 5.1.5.4 TSM server 5.1.5.4 on AIX 5.1 When I used domdsmc or TDP GUI as user Administrator, I always got error messages like the one above for some of databases. Databases for which I got this error were not always the same. Sometimes some of databases was backed up succesfuly, sometimes not. When I run domdsmc via TSM scheduler, which is running under Local system user ID, all databases was backed up without errors. When I stoped Domino server and started it in foreground using Administrator ID, I could sucessfuly backup all databases with TDP GUI and also with domdsmc (using Administrator ID). So it seems that it depends on user ID, under which is Domino server running and also user ID under which is TDP for Domino running. When standard Domino instalation procedure is used, Domino server will run as service with Local system user ID and then you can not backup all databases corectly using TDP GUI or command line. Is it working as designed or is it bug? Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: Year retention oracle backups
Steve, thank you for your very helpfull reply. I did not know that Oracle is using its own prefix for each backup. I am not Oracle guy. And you are right, the subject line was bad by my mistake (I did reply and forgot to change subject) I have one more question. If I will do regular backups of Oracle db using full+incremental system, do I need to create separate, out of order backup for one year retension, or I can use normal full backup and only assign to this backup different prefix? Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LD.GOV.AU>cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: Year retention oracle backups Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17.03.2003 23:09 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Josef, I nearly didn't reply to this because of your inappropriate subject line - I'll assume it was a mistake. RMAN generates its own names for the backuppieces, but the oracle admin has control of the prefix used. One option that they can use is different prefixes for different retentions, and then use these prefixes in their delete scripts. TDPO doesn't care. It holds its data until RMAN tells it to delete. It is the DBA's problem not yours. Steve Harris AIX and TSM Admin Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17/03/2003 21:29:31 >>> Helo guys, one of our customer wants to backup Oracle databases in such a way, that along with normal daily backup with 14 days retension should be also once a week created sparate full backups of Oracle databases, which should be kept for 1 year. My question is how to do this as eficintly as possible (som of databases are quite large - 400 GB). Is there any other solution than to use two different node names? And if I use two node names for Oracle backup, how to configure TDP? Do I need two RMAN backup repositories - one for each TSM node or can I use only one? Thank you in advance Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 ** This e-mail, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/ received in error. Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this e-mail is prohibited. It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to health service matters. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this e-mail in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by return e-mail. You should also delete this e-mail message and destroy any hard copies produced. **
Re: urgent! server is down!
Helo guys, one of our customer wants to backup Oracle databases in such a way, that along with normal daily backup with 14 days retension should be also once a week created sparate full backups of Oracle databases, which should be kept for 1 year. My question is how to do this as eficintly as possible (som of databases are quite large - 400 GB). Is there any other solution than to use two different node names? And if I use two node names for Oracle backup, how to configure TDP? Do I need two RMAN backup repositories - one for each TSM node or can I use only one? Thank you in advance Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: TDP for Domino 5.1.5 problem
Yes Del, you are right. It was my mistake. I was looking at wrong file. File domdsm.cfg is OK. I tried to debug TDP with options you sent to me. It looks to me that something is wrong with names.nsf database (it reports 0KB size). Our Domino guys will try to upgrade to Domino 6.01. Fortunately it is only test server. Thank you for your help Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Del Hoobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BM.COM> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: TDP for Domino 5.1.5 problem "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 11.03.2003 15:37 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Jozef, The "preference" information, by default, comes from DOMDSM.CFG not DOMDSM.OPT (unless you override it on the command-line.) DOMDSM.CFG is the "DP for Domino" config/preferences file. DSM.OPT is the TSM API config file. These are two different files with different uses. You can turn on tracing for DP for Domino by adding this to the invocation: /TRACEFLAG=ALL /TRACEFILE=filename.txt If you want it examined by support, you will need to call IBM support. Thanks, Del Del Hoobler IBM Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Remember that the best job security is doing a job well and doing it cheerfully.
Re: TDP for Domino 5.1.5 problem
Thank you for response Del, on the Domino server there is only one notes.ini file in dir. c: \lotus\domino. Interesting is that for example events4.nsf sometimes backup succesfully and sometimes not. Now, except three dbs (names.nsf, events4.nsf and dbdirman.nsf) all dbs I can backup. Is there any possibilty to debug backup process? Or any oyher ideas? One interesting thing. In output from "domdsmc q pref" I can see: C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\domino>domdsmc q pref IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Lotus Domino Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2002. All rights res Data Protection for Domino Preferences BUFFers 8 BUFFERSIze . 1024 DATEformat . 1 LANGUAGE ... AMENG LOGFile domdsm.log LOGPRUne ... 30 MOUNTWait .. Yes NOTESInipath ... c:\Lotus\Domino NUMberformat ... 1 REPlace Yes STATistics . No SUBDir . Yes TIMEformat . 1 But in domdsm.opt I see: BUFFers 3 BUFFERSIze 1024 LOGFile domdsm.log LOGPrune 60 REPlace yes SUBDir no MOUNTWaityes DATEformat 1 TIMEformat 1 NUMberformat 1 NOTESIniPath LastPruneDate There is no Notesinipath parameter set. Is this normal? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Del Hoobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BM.COM> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: TDP for Domino 5.1.5 problem "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 11.03.2003 14:18 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Jozef, This normally means that Data Protection for Domino is picking up the wrong NOTES.INI file. To help resolve this issue... 1. Make sure that NOTESINIPATH setting is pointing to the correct directory containing the NOTES.INI file of the active Domino Server. 2. Make sure there is not a NOTES.INI file in the \WINNT or \WINNT\SYSTEM32 directory. The Domino Server API code looks there first, even if you specify the directory where you want it to look. 3. If the above two things do not resolve the issue, search for all occurences of the NOTES.INI file on your machine and find out if it is picking that one up first. You could do this by temporarily renaming all of them EXCEPT the one that your active Domino Server is using. Thanks, Del Del Hoobler IBM Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Remember that the best job security is doing a job well and doing it cheerfully. == > I have following problem with Domino backup: > when I do backup of Domio databases (GUI or cmd line) I always got a lot of > following mesages: > > 03/11/2003 09:40:02 This database is currently being used by someone else. > In order to share a Notes database, all users must use a Domino Server > instead of a File Server. > 03/11/2003 09:40:08 Backup of names.nsf failed. > 03/11/2003 09:40:08 This database is currently being used by someone else. > In order to share a Notes database, all users must use a Domino Server > instead of a File Server. > 03/11/2003 09:40:10 Backup of catalog.nsf failed.
TDP for Domino 5.1.5 problem
Hi TSM-ers I have following problem with Domino backup: when I do backup of Domio databases (GUI or cmd line) I always got a lot of following mesages: 03/11/2003 09:40:02 This database is currently being used by someone else. In order to share a Notes database, all users must use a Domino Server instead of a File Server. 03/11/2003 09:40:08 Backup of names.nsf failed. 03/11/2003 09:40:08 This database is currently being used by someone else. In order to share a Notes database, all users must use a Domino Server instead of a File Server. 03/11/2003 09:40:10 Backup of catalog.nsf failed. Environment: Domino 6.0 server on Windows 2000 SP3 TDP for Domino 5.1.5 TSM client 5.1.5.4 TSM server 5.1.5.2 on AIX 5.1 I can backup all ntf files and most of nsf databases, but some of databases fail to backup - names.nsf allways fail I can open all databases with LN client without any problem (through Domino server of course). All tasks on Domino server were stoped except DB server. No antivirus or other SW, which could lock files. our Domino admin checked that nobody is using databases via filesystem (not through Domino server) Does somebody know what could be the reason for this kind of failure ? I know it is probably Domino problem, but hope somebody can help. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: File Devices and SAN
According to doc, using shared disk storage for LAN-free backup in SAN environment is possible using Tivoli SANergy. My 2 cents Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RISTIE.SE> cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: File Devices and SAN Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 06.03.2003 11:13 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi Again! I have a real research about your problem. (I was have a good time. Learn me alot about TSM). I got some wild ideas how we can sold it but after a wild I start from the begingn again. The only thing i know right now is that. You can not send data direct to the SAN disk you most send data to the TSM Server first and after that send data to the SAN Disk And the only way to do that is to create a file device and boundle it to a Storage device. That is the only way to do it. And you don´t need to create a library or path to fix that. Becuse the Device Class "File" can not boundle to a Library. If you most create a Library (I don´t know way) can you try with Removable Media and File Library and File Drive. That is the only way to do it. Another way is to use command "Define Datamover". But that is only when you use NAS. Datamover have support for SCSI aswell but I don´t know if that is enough. But good luck! Med Vänliga Hälsningar/Best Regards Christian Svensson --- Cristie Nordic AB Box 2 SE-131 06 Nacka Sweden Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30 Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77 eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help setting up RMAN w/ TDP 2210
Hi Theresa, I had similar problem. Check your LANG environment variable for user under which you are running backup scripts (RMAN). It should be equal to language used in TSM API. For example: if you have En_US subdirectory in TSM api client, your LANG variable have to be LANG=En_US. Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Theresa Sarver To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help setting up RMAN w/ TDP 2210 Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 24.02.2003 23:35 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi all; I'm having all kinds of problems and am hoping someone can assist me with this setup...as I'm all confused at this point. Environment: AIX 51 ML3 TSM Server 5162 TSM (ba) Client 510 (64 bit) TSM (api) Client 4210 (32 bit) TDP (oracle) Client 2210 (32 bit) Oracle Enterprise Server 817 As this server is running AIX5 w/ Oracle 817 databases I had to install TDP 2210 (if I read the documentation right), and TDP 22 installed the 4210 (32 bit) API. No matter what we try RMAN will not backup, we went from seeing the following errrors: RMAN-03007: retryable error occurred during execution of command: allocate RMAN-07004: unhandled exception during command execution on channel dev1 RMAN-10035: exception raised in RPC: ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-19557: device error, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27000: skgfqsbi: failed to initialize storage subsystem (SBT) layer IBM AIX RISC System/6000 Error: 2534: System call error number 2534. to this error: RMAN-03007: retryable error occurred during execution of command: allocate RMAN-07004: unhandled exception during command execution on channel dev1 RMAN-10035: exception raised in RPC: ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-19557: device error, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27000: skgfqsbi: failed to initialize storage subsystem (SBT) layer IBM AIX RISC System/6000 Error: 2518: System call error number 2518. I tripple checked that the libobk.a file is linked to the correct location: /c2qnu01/u01/oracle/product/8.1.7/lib>ls -la libobk.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 oracle dba 17 Feb 21 11:20 libobk.a -> /usr/lib/li bobk.a Output of tdpo.opt: DSMI_ORC_CONFIG/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/dsm.opt.oracle DSMI_LOG /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin TDPO_FSadmsorc TDPO_NODE c2qnu01_oracle TDPO_OWNER oracle TDPO_PSWDPATH /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin I have attached the dsm.opt and dsm.sys files for your review. I have linked them both from the api directory back to the ba/bin directory: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 44 Feb 21 16:22 dsm.opt.oracle -> /usr/ tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.opt.oracle lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 37 Feb 20 16:05 dsm.sys -> /usr/tivoli/ tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys The password file was generated fine and I was able to run the tdpoconf showenv, the contents of which I included. I also provided the tdpoerror.log - though I don't think it'll help any. I've gone through all relevant archive articles and nothing seems to apply to my situation. I also opened a PMR with TSM Support, but I haven't heard anything back yet. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you; Theresa (See attached file: dsm.sys) (See attached file: dsm.opt.oracle) (See attached file: lslpp.txt) (See attached file: tdpoconf.outfile) (See attached file: tdpoerror.log) dsm.sys Description: Binary data dsm.opt.oracle Description: Binary data lslpp.txt Description: Binary data tdpoconf.outfile Description: Binary data tdpoerror.log Description: Binary data
TSM server crashing
Hello guys, Can you help me please with following problem? I have TSM server v.4.1.1 on Win NT 4.0 SP6i (I know it is quite old) Recently (about two weeks ago) my server started to crash. Here is output from my activity log: 02/23/2003 18:32:26 ANR0987I Process 5 for EXPIRATION running in the BACKGROUND processed 1 items with a completion state of SUCCESS at 18:32:26. 02/23/2003 23:52:18 ANRD pkthread.c(962): Unable to create new Thread. CreateThread error. 02/23/2003 23:52:18 << Message number 8219 not available for language AMENG >> 02/24/2003 04:00:16 ANR2750I Starting scheduled command ADSMDB ( run adsmdb_backup ). 02/24/2003 04:00:16 ANR2102I Activity log pruning started: removing entries prior to 02/23/2003 00:00:00. 02/24/2003 04:00:16 ANR2017I Administrator RADO issued command: RUN adsmdb_backup 02/24/2003 04:00:16 ANR2017I Administrator RADO issued command: DELETE VOLHISTORY type=dbbackup todate=today-1 totime=now 02/24/2003 04:00:20 ANR2103I Activity log pruning completed: 364 records removed. 02/24/2003 04:00:22 ANR2467I DELETE VOLHISTORY: 1 sequential volume history entries were successfully deleted. 02/24/2003 04:00:22 ANR2017I Administrator RADO issued command: BACKUP DB type=full devclass=DLTCLASS scratch=yes volumenames=ADSMDB1,ADSMDB2 wait=no 02/24/2003 04:00:22 ANR2753I (ADSMDB):ANR2467I DELETE VOLHISTORY: 1 sequential volume 02/24/2003 04:00:22 ANR2753I (ADSMDB):history entries were successfully deleted. 02/24/2003 04:02:07 ANR0984I Process 6 for DATABASE BACKUP started in the BACKGROUND at 04:02:07. 02/24/2003 04:02:07 ANR2280I Full database backup started as process 6. 02/24/2003 04:02:07 ANR1462I RUN: Command script ADSMDB_BACKUP completed successfully. 02/24/2003 04:02:07 ANR2753I (ADSMDB):ANR2280I Full database backup started as process 02/24/2003 04:02:07 ANR2753I (ADSMDB):6. 02/24/2003 04:02:07 ANR2753I (ADSMDB):ANR1462I RUN: Command script ADSMDB_BACKUP 02/24/2003 04:02:07 ANR2753I (ADSMDB):completed successfully. 02/24/2003 04:02:07 ANR2751I Scheduled command ADSMDB completed successfully. 02/24/2003 04:02:15 ANR1409W Volume ADSMDB1 already in use - skipped. 02/24/2003 04:03:10 << Message number 7838 not available for language AMENG >> 02/24/2003 04:03:10 << Message number 7837 not available for language AMENG >> 02/24/2003 04:03:11 << Message number 7833 not available for language AMENG >> 02/24/2003 04:03:11 << Message number 7833 not available for language AMENG >> 02/24/2003 04:03:11 << Message number 7833 not available for language AMENG >> 02/24/2003 07:43:18 ANR1412W Volume IP001 access mode is "unavailable". --- After message 02/24/2003 04:03:11 << Message number 7833 not available for language AMENG >> server crashed and restarted. No error message in dsmerror.log. After restarting the server I found this message in activity log: 02/24/2003 07:43:18 ANR0362W Database usage exceeds 96 % of its assigned capacity. Could this be a reason for crashing the server? Does somebody know, what means this message << Message number 7838 not available for language AMENG >>? Thank you for your help Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: Someone with a problem with an LTO, AIX 5.1 conn refused.
Hi Humberto, I recabled my 3583 library according to specified document and up to now it is working pretty well. It seems that the problem was solved. Thank you and others who responded very much for your help. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Humberto Gomez Lopez To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Someone with a problem with an LTO, AIX 5.1 conn refused. Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 14.02.2003 21:26 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" On this day someone submitted and issue about getting always connection refused with the LTO, and always timeout on the drive 1. This link could get responses to him... http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1001470&aid=1
Re: Semote storage pool
Have you checked access right for user under which TSM server is running to shared directory? I have got this error message when TSM server had not proper access rights to shared directory. Take care especialy if you are using NT domain users. If I remember correctly (It is quite a long time since I did this kind of configuration), user "system", (under which, I believe, TSM server is running by default) is normaly not a member of NT domain. . Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 DFrance cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Semote storage pool "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 19.02.2003 08:20 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Sorry to say, you might have had a version with a big HOLE in it; both FILE and DISK storage pool volumes must be "local" devices to Win2K... using 4.2.1.0. This may be a problem with my 4.2.1 system -- as I recall, SANergy is designed to help this type situation using SAN-based disk pools; it failed on LAN connection with: ANR8366E DEFINE DEVCLASS: Invalid value for DIRECTORY parameter. Separately, with TSM's virtual volumes, a TSM server on the Linux box could be used to store data from the Win2K server, using DISK storage pool, archive objects, etc. Don France Technical Architect -- Tivoli Certified Consultant Tivoli Storage Manager, WinNT/2K, AIX/Unix, OS/390 San Jose, Ca (408) 257-3037 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (change aye to a for replies) Professional Association of Contract Employees (P.A.C.E. -- www.pacepros.com) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jozef Zatko Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Semote storage pool Hi Etienne, it is easy. I suppose you have a server with disk capacity, which you want use for TSM to store data. I do not know if that remote machine is Windows or Unix system. It is possible to use both of them (I actually worked only with Windows system but with NFS in Unix it should be also possible). On Windows system you create shared directory, which TSM server will use for file volumes. You must assign access proper rights to this share for user, under which TSM server is running, so that TSM server can access this directory and create and delete files. Let say for example that your remote machine is named "server1" and shared directory is named "data". If TSM server have proper access rights, you can create storage pool on this shared directory like this: define devclass remotefile devt=file maxcap=200M directory=\\server1\data define stg filestg remotefile maxscr=100 You have to be carefull about setting maxscr parameter. This parameter depends on maxcap parameter from device class. If you multiply this two number, the result should not be greater than storage capacity you have available on remote server (in my example I assume you have 20 GB). If you have Unix machine, you can do the same steps except tha
Re: Semote storage pool
Hi Etienne,
it is easy. I suppose you have a server with disk capacity, which you want
use for TSM to store data. I do not know if that remote machine is Windows
or Unix system. It is possible to use both of them (I actually worked only
with Windows system but with NFS in Unix it should be also possible).
On Windows system you create shared directory, which TSM server will use
for file volumes. You must assign access proper rights to this share for
user, under which TSM server is running, so that TSM server can access this
directory and create and delete files.
Let say for example that your remote machine is named "server1" and shared
directory is named "data".
If TSM server have proper access rights, you can create storage pool on
this shared directory like this:
define devclass remotefile devt=file maxcap=200M directory=\\server1\data
define stg filestg remotefile maxscr=100
You have to be carefull about setting maxscr parameter. This parameter
depends on maxcap parameter from device class. If you multiply this two
number, the result should not be greater than storage capacity you have
available on remote server (in my example I assume you have 20 GB).
If you have Unix machine, you can do the same steps except that in devclass
definition for directory parameter you use your NFS mount directory.
And that is all.
Hope this helps
Ing. Jozef Zatko
Login a.s.
Dlha 2, Stupava
tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
"Chandrasekha
r, C.R" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Semote storage pool
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
18.02.2003
11:27
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
Ing. Jozef Zatko,
Can you share the steps to achieve this remote storage pool.
Thanks,
chandrasekhar
-Original Message-
From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Semote storage pool
Hi Etienne,
you can use remote disks for file device class. I am not sure about 5.1
version, but I did this on 4.2 version and it worked fine.
I had problems with using disk device class on remote disks, but file
device class worked for me.
You can even use UNC names for file volumes (it is better than using drive
mapping, bacause you do not need to be logged in to console on TSM server)
Ing. Jozef Zatko
Login a.s.
Dlha 2, Stupava
tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
GUILLAUMONT Etienne
cc:
Sent by: "ADSM:Subject: Semote storage
pool
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DU>
18.02.2003 09:51
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a storage pool on a remote
machine witho
Re: Semote storage pool
Hi Etienne, you can use remote disks for file device class. I am not sure about 5.1 version, but I did this on 4.2 version and it worked fine. I had problems with using disk device class on remote disks, but file device class worked for me. You can even use UNC names for file volumes (it is better than using drive mapping, bacause you do not need to be logged in to console on TSM server) Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 GUILLAUMONT Etienne cc: Sent by: "ADSM:Subject: Semote storage pool Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] DU> 18.02.2003 09:51 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hello, I would like to know if it is possible to have a storage pool on a remote machine without installing TSM on it. Typically, what I wan't to do is to use space on a remote server to have a disk or a file storage pool on it. I tried with a file device class and it allows only local disks. A disk devices class goes a little further, but when it tries to format the volume, there's an error. One possibility would be to create a local file storage pool and then to copy the files on the remote servers and put the file volumes in offline state, or something like that, but is there something easier ? I tried that with TSM 5.1.5 Etienne GUILLAUMONT e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] RGB Technologie Parc d'Innovation, Bâtiment PYTHAGORE 11 Rue Jean SAPIDUS 67400 ILLKIRCH Tél : 03 90 40 60 60 Fax : 03 90 40 60 61
Re: Someone with a problem with an LTO, AIX 5.1 conn refused.
Hi Gomez, thak you for this info. I checked my SANDGW firmware version and I have this problematic version (4.20.05). I will try to recable my library (according to document) and I will inform you. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Humberto Gomez Lopez To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Someone with a problem with an LTO, AIX 5.1 conn refused. Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 14.02.2003 21:26 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" On this day someone submitted and issue about getting always connection refused with the LTO, and always timeout on the drive 1. This link could get responses to him... http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1001470&aid=1
Re: LTO 3583 doesn't end audit lib
Humberto, you probably checked in tapes, which heve not been labeled with label libvolume. If you use option checklabel=bar, it is possible. Try checkout this volume from library and then do label libvolume. Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Humberto Gómez López To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LTO 3583 doesn't end audit lib Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 13.02.2003 15:50 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Platform: W2k, TSM 5.1.6, San Data Gateway 2108 R03. I keep getting this on actlog after submitting audit lib, could anyone help on this? 40:04 ANR0609I AUDIT LIBRARY started as process 5. 02/13/2003 09:41:30 ANR8941W The volume from slot-element 4098 in drive MT0.4.0.3 (\\.\Tape1) in library LB0.1.0.3 is blank. 02/13/2003 09:41:37 ANR8941W The volume from slot-element 4097 in drive MT0.2.0.3 (\\.\Tape0) in library LB0.1.0.3 is blank. 02/13/2003 09:41:57 ANR8300E I/O error on library LB0.1.0.3 (OP=8401C058, CC=305, KEY=05, ASC=53, ASCQ=01, SENSE=70.00.05.00.00.00- .00.0A.00.00.00.00.53.01.00.00.00.00., Description=Drive failure). Refer to Appendix D in the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. 02/13/2003 09:41:57 ANR8942E Could not move volume NOT KNOWN from slot-element 257 to slot-element 4098. 02/13/2003 09:42:14 ANR8460E AUDIT LIBRARY process for library LB0.1.0.3 failed. 02/13/2003 09:42:14 ANR0985I Process 5 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 09:42:14. - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Re: LTO 3583 drive problem.
In my environment I have following: IBM 3534 F08 FC switch, Atape driver 7.1.5.0, 2 SCSI drives with code 25D4, AIX 5.1 ML 02, TSM 5.1.5.2, library 3583 with firmware 2.80.0410, SAN Data Gateway code 4.20.05. Each device is on separate SCSI channel. Library and SAN Data GW do not report any errors. I will have to have closer look on SAN switch. Humberto, can you provide more detailed info about your configuration? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 David Longo cc: Sent by: "ADSM: DistSubject: Re: LTO 3583 drive problem. Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] U> 12.02.2003 05:17 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I have seen some messages here recently about 3583 drive errors. I have a 3584 with (8) Fibre drives going through McData switches. with TSM Server 4.2.2.10 on AIX 4.3.3 ML 10 and Atape sdriver 7.1.1.0. 3584 library code 2460 and drive code 25D4. Have had 3584 about a year. Have had intermittant errors maybe 2-3 times a month, but noticed that were only happening on DRIVE1 which has control path. Moved Control path to DRIVE5 and sure enough the errors were then happening on that drive. Working with our IBM CE on this for several months, IBM Tucson initially was saying that the errors we were getting were media errors. But I could reuse tha same tape and it would have no more problems. On some instances, the tape would not be dismounted from drive but have to have drive reset for eject. Finally in late December my IBM CE called and said that IBM Tucson had seen this problem all over and it was happeing on the Fibre Drives, the drive that the Control Path was on and going through either IBM 2109 or McData switches. These were the common factors. IBM is working on a code fix (I assume for drives and/or library). I suspect problem could be happening on 3583 also. David Longo >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/11/03 11:10AM >>> Hi, I have exactly the same problem except that I have TSM server on AIX 5.1. It is very strange, because it happens randomly always during unmounting the tape. It is always the same drive - /dev/rmt0. Tape remains in the drive. I can unload tape using operator panel without any problem. But if I want to use tapeutil utility I get following error when I try to open device /dev/rmt0 Operation failed with errno 79: Connection refused I have to reset SAN Data Gateway and then the drive is again accesible with tapeutil and also from TSM server. Does somebody know, what does error message : Operation failed with errno 79: Connection refused mean? Where I can find information about this error number. I was looking in Atape driver doc but there is no mention about this message. In output from errpt there is no error from fibre adapter nor from tape drive. Here is copy of Event log from SAN DAta Gateway: SequenceTime CodeDescription 0031 FEB 11 2003 08:03:45 110 Health Check 1: Link Status Has Changed on FCAL 2: linkFail: 0/0, syncLost: 0/0, sigLost: 0/0, primSpErr: 0/0, invWord: 12/0, invCrc: 0/0 0029 FEB 11 2003 08:03:03 70 NOTICE: Reboot Complete 0028 FEB 11 2003 08:02:59 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 3, handle 0x091ac308 0027 FEB 11 2003 08:02:59 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 2, handle 0x09e68408 0023 FEB 11 2003 08:02:57 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 1, handle 0x09ffbe08 0022 FEB 11 2003 08:02:54 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET 0021 FEB 11 2003 08:02:53 28 USCSI 2: Bus RESET 0016 FEB 11 2003 08:02:52 28 USCSI 1: Bus RESET 0014 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 0, handle 0x091b8700 0011 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 4: Bus RESET 0010 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET 0009 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 2: Bus RESET 0008 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 1: Bus RESET 0057 FEB 11 2003 08:02:20 13 NOTICE: System Shutting Down 0031 FEB 10 2003 03:22:02 110 Health Check 1: Link Status Has Changed on FCAL 2: linkFail: 0/0, syncLost: 0/0, sigLost: 0/0, primSpErr: 0/0, invWord: 12/0, invCrc: 0/0 0029 FEB 10 2003 03:21:20 70 NOTICE: Reboot Complete 0028 FEB 10 2003 03:21:16 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 3, handle 0x091ac408 0027 FEB 10 2003 03:21:16 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 2, handle 0x09e68408 0023 FEB 10 2003 03:21:14 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 1, handle 0x09ffbe08 0022 FEB 10 2003 03:21:11 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET I am not specialist, but in my opinion there is only messages generated during device rebooting. A
Re: LTO 3583 drive problem.
Hi, I have exactly the same problem except that I have TSM server on AIX 5.1. It is very strange, because it happens randomly always during unmounting the tape. It is always the same drive - /dev/rmt0. Tape remains in the drive. I can unload tape using operator panel without any problem. But if I want to use tapeutil utility I get following error when I try to open device /dev/rmt0 Operation failed with errno 79: Connection refused I have to reset SAN Data Gateway and then the drive is again accesible with tapeutil and also from TSM server. Does somebody know, what does error message : Operation failed with errno 79: Connection refused mean? Where I can find information about this error number. I was looking in Atape driver doc but there is no mention about this message. In output from errpt there is no error from fibre adapter nor from tape drive. Here is copy of Event log from SAN DAta Gateway: SequenceTime CodeDescription 0031 FEB 11 2003 08:03:45 110 Health Check 1: Link Status Has Changed on FCAL 2: linkFail: 0/0, syncLost: 0/0, sigLost: 0/0, primSpErr: 0/0, invWord: 12/0, invCrc: 0/0 0029 FEB 11 2003 08:03:03 70 NOTICE: Reboot Complete 0028 FEB 11 2003 08:02:59 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 3, handle 0x091ac308 0027 FEB 11 2003 08:02:59 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 2, handle 0x09e68408 0023 FEB 11 2003 08:02:57 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 1, handle 0x09ffbe08 0022 FEB 11 2003 08:02:54 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET 0021 FEB 11 2003 08:02:53 28 USCSI 2: Bus RESET 0016 FEB 11 2003 08:02:52 28 USCSI 1: Bus RESET 0014 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 0, handle 0x091b8700 0011 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 4: Bus RESET 0010 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET 0009 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 2: Bus RESET 0008 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 1: Bus RESET 0057 FEB 11 2003 08:02:20 13 NOTICE: System Shutting Down 0031 FEB 10 2003 03:22:02 110 Health Check 1: Link Status Has Changed on FCAL 2: linkFail: 0/0, syncLost: 0/0, sigLost: 0/0, primSpErr: 0/0, invWord: 12/0, invCrc: 0/0 0029 FEB 10 2003 03:21:20 70 NOTICE: Reboot Complete 0028 FEB 10 2003 03:21:16 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 3, handle 0x091ac408 0027 FEB 10 2003 03:21:16 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 2, handle 0x09e68408 0023 FEB 10 2003 03:21:14 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 1, handle 0x09ffbe08 0022 FEB 10 2003 03:21:11 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET I am not specialist, but in my opinion there is only messages generated during device rebooting. Any help appreciated Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Humberto Gomez Lopez To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LTO 3583 drive problem. Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 11.02.2003 14:54 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi, I have installed TSM 5.1.6 Server on W2k, and after configuring the library and the drives and after checking in some tapes succesfully, Submitting an audit library command I keep getting this error: 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8304E Time out error on drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3) in library LB0.7.0.3. 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8912E Unable to verify the label of volume from slot-element 16 in drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3) in library LB0.7.0.3. 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8302E I/O error on drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3) (OP=OFFL, Error Number=21, CC=0, KEY=02, ASC=3A, ASCQ=00, SENSE=70.00.02.00.00.00.00.1C.00.00.00.00.3A.00.00.00.10- .13.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.04.0- 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.- 00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00- .00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0- 0.00.00.00.00, Description=An undetermined error has occurred). Refer to Appendix D in the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. 02/11/2003 09:37:10 ANR8942E Could not move volume NOT KNOWN from slot-element 256 to slot-element 16. 02/11/2003 09:37:10 ANRD mmsscsi.c(9702): ThreadId<34> Volume may still be in the drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3). 02/11/2003 09:37:10 ANR8446I Manual intervention required for library
Re: TDPO backup failing with ANS0236E error
Tim, that was it. I did some tests and forgot to change passwordaccess back to prompt. Thank you for your response. Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 "HEMPSTEAD, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A.SLB.COM>cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Re: TDPO backup failing with ANS0236E error Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 22.01.2003 09:57 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Jozef, The TDP for Oracle documentation says that the TDP for Oracle will not work with PASSWORDACCESS=generate (see the options section under Part 2 of the chapter on configuring the TDP). Regards Tim -----Original Message- From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2003 08:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TDPO backup failing with ANS0236E error Hello guys, I have a problem with Oracle backup with TDPO 2.2.1. Environment: TSM server 5.1.5.4 on AIX 5.1 Oracle 8.1.7 TDPO 2.2.1 TSM API client 4.2.1 The backup fails with following error (copy from RMAN backup log): ORA-19511: ANS0236E (RC2032) On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed when PASSWORDACCESS=generate. In messages, I found this explanation to this error number: ANS0236E On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed when PASSWORDACCESS=generate. Explanation: PASSWORDACCESS=generate establishes a session with the current login user as the owner. System Action: The system returns to the calling procedure. User Response: When using PASSWORDACCESS=generate, set clientOwnerNameP to NULL. Does somebody know what is the clientOwnerNameP and where I can set it to NULL? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 _ This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of SchlumbergerSema. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the SchlumbergerSema Helpdesk by telephone on +44 (0) 121 627 5600. _
TDPO backup failing with ANS0236E error
Hello guys, I have a problem with Oracle backup with TDPO 2.2.1. Environment: TSM server 5.1.5.4 on AIX 5.1 Oracle 8.1.7 TDPO 2.2.1 TSM API client 4.2.1 The backup fails with following error (copy from RMAN backup log): ORA-19511: ANS0236E (RC2032) On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed when PASSWORDACCESS=generate. In messages, I found this explanation to this error number: ANS0236E On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed when PASSWORDACCESS=generate. Explanation: PASSWORDACCESS=generate establishes a session with the current login user as the owner. System Action: The system returns to the calling procedure. User Response: When using PASSWORDACCESS=generate, set clientOwnerNameP to NULL. Does somebody know what is the clientOwnerNameP and where I can set it to NULL? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: TDP for Domino ACD5130E message
Hi Brian, couple of things to check. Is your TDP fo Domino using correct notes.ini file? I already had problem with this. On Domino server there was couple of copies of notes.ini file in various directiries and despite the fact I had in domdsm.cfg set the correct one, TDP was using another copy of notes.ini from different directory, which contained wrong oprions. Another problem can be with options keyfilename and serverkeyfilename (or something like that) in notes.ini. Your keyfilename should point to your server id. TDP for Domino is not using serverkeyfilename option (according to my experiences). Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 "Brian L. Nick" cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: TDP for Domino ACD5130E message Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 13.01.2003 17:56 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Good morning all. First things first. We are running TSM 4.2.1.9 on OS/390 2.10. Also running TSM 4.1.2.12 on NT and TDP for Domino 1.1. All of our Domino servers ( 6 ) are configured the same way but one of our Domino servers is receiving the following message when we attempt to restore a mail file: ACD5130E - Could not initialize the connection to Lotus Domino properly error=416. This is a pretty generic message an indicates either a TDP or Domino install problem. This server is however backing up without issue and we have been able to do restores in the past. We did have this same issue once before on this server and we did a re-install of TDP which appeared to have corrected this issue until today. Has anyone else experienced this problem and if so is it a known problem with a fix available? I am aware that the TSM client version is no longer supported and that TDP 1.1 will be unsupported in April of this year. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Brian Brian L. Nick Systems Technician - Storage Solutions The Phoenix Companies Inc. 100 Bright Meadow Blvd Enfield CT. 06082-1900 E-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHONE: (860)403-2281
Re: Oracle RMAN error
Hi guys, I have very similar problem with TDPO 2.2.1, except that I do not get error messages, but rman coredumps. My TSM server is 5.1.5.4 on AIX 5.1 and client is 5.1 on AIX 5.1. All 32 bits. According to my investigations, there is something wrong with using libobk.a by rman. Rman coredumps when trying to use this library with "allocate chanel" command. Could you please share info about solution when you find some? One of thing which confuses me is, that according to TDPO manual, you should set passwordaccess to prompt, not to generate. API clients usualy require passwordaccess set to generate. Somebody can shed some light? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 David Longo cc: Sent by: "ADSM: DistSubject: Oracle RMAN error Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] U> 07.01.2003 21:27 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" We have Oracle 8.1.7.4.0 (32 bit)on AIX 4.3.3 and TDPO 2.2.1.0. TSM server is 4.2.2.10. The client is a new setup. When DBA tries to do a test backup with his RMAN script, he gets the following error messages: - RMAN-03007: retryable error occurred during execution of command: allocate RMAN-10035: exception raised in RPC: ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-19557: device error, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-19511: Unknown SBT error code = 0, errno = 0 -- I have run "tdpoconf showenv" and all looks good. We have slightly earlier versions of Oracle and TDPO on other AIX machines and it runs o.k. Just copied RMAN script to this machine and touched up for this node. Have checked a few things and all looks o.k. Any suggestions? Thanks, David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "MMS " made the following annotations on 01/07/2003 03:29:03 PM -- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ==
Re: NAS as a backup unit?
Christian, you can use NAS device as a backup unit, but according to my experiences only as a sequential media. Network attached drives are not functioning correctly (probably because of the way the connection to file server is kept). I was using network drives for sequential volumes without any problems. Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: DB2 Backup using different node names
Hi Eduardo, could you please provide the content of your dsm.opt and dsm.sys? Also, are you trying to backup your database with scheduler or by hand from command line. When you want backup one database with two different node names, you have to have correct environment DSMI_CONFIG,(I assume your platform is Unix) for particular TSM node in user environment, who owns database instance. Are tou sure you are switching your environment correctly? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: Backup of Domino R6
Del, thank you for your response. Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Backup of Domino R6
Hi TSMers, I have one simple (I hope) question. Is it possible to use TDP for Domino 1.1.2 with Domino R6 (W2K) or I have to upgrade to TDP for Mail 5.1.5? On Tivoli web I am not able to find this kind of information. Thank you in advance Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: PostSchedCMD sendmail on W2K
Hi Juraj, under Win2K, for sending SMTP mail, I am succesfully using freeware utility Gbmail. It is command line utility, so there is no problem with using it in scripts. I can send it to you if you want. Regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Salak Juraj cc: Sent by: Subject: PostSchedCMD sendmail on W2K "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 07.11.2002 14:54 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi, this is a NT2000 related question but anyone else might had had same headache: I try to mail a (grep of) tsmsched.log to backup admin via PostSchedCMD under W2K. On my W2K workstation, having Outlook installed, configured and running and using small sendmail utility I fail to mail the results because of MAPI logon failure, event if all TSM services run under my local account and I am logged on. Maybe someone out there does succesfully use another tool or equivalent reporting method? regards Juraj
TSM client on Solaris is core dumping
Hello guys, I was searching archives and did not find solution for this problem: Environment: TSM server 4.2.1.9 on SUN Solaris 2.8 TSM client 4.2.1.28 on SUN Solaris 2.6 ver 5/98 When I start the client and want to do a restore, the client core dumps. The same is for GUI and also for command line client. In client error log I can see following messages: 07/31/02 10:27:44 Error trying to 'open(O_RDWR|O_CREAT)' lockfile '/etc/adsm/SpaceMan/config/dmiFSGlobalStat e.pid': No such file or directory 07/31/02 10:27:44 1st Restore Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 07/31/02 10:30:23 Error trying to 'open(O_RDWR|O_CREAT)' lockfile '/etc/adsm/SpaceMan/config/dmiFSGlobalStat e.pid': No such file or directory 07/31/02 10:30:23 1st Restore Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 07/31/02 10:32:03 Error trying to 'open(O_RDWR|O_CREAT)' lockfile '/etc/adsm/SpaceMan/config/dmiFSGlobalStat e.pid': No such file or directory 07/31/02 10:32:03 1st Restore Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 07/31/02 10:32:32 Error trying to 'open(O_RDWR|O_CREAT)' lockfile '/etc/adsm/SpaceMan/config/dmiFSGlobalStat e.pid': No such file or directory 07/31/02 10:32:32 1st Restore Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 07/31/02 10:37:04 Error trying to 'open(O_RDWR|O_CREAT)' lockfile '/etc/adsm/SpaceMan/config/dmiFSGlobalStat e.pid': No such file or directory 07/31/02 10:37:04 1st Restore Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 07/31/02 10:44:45 ANS1302E No objects on server match query Any help is very appreciated Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: experience in DB Adm
Hi Luciano, in order to expand capacity of your database, you must (after creating db volume) assign this new space to db with command: extend db 1000 Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Luciano Ariceto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18.07.2002 15:35 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:experience in DB Adm Hi Last weekend we had a problem with DB capacity as follow : ANR0362W Database usage exceeds 98 % of its assigned capacity. ANR0131E dftxn.c838: Server DB space exhausted. ANR1181E dftxn.c200: Data storage transaction 0:424803852 was aborted. After this, the TSM server "frozen" and we expanded de DB ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: DEFINE DBVOLUME f:\tivoli\db\db05.tsm FORMATSIZE=1000 WAIT=NO ANR0984I Process 14 for DEFINE DBVOLUME started in the BACKGROUND at 04:57:46. ANR2491I Volume Creation Process starting for f:\tivoli\-db\db05.tsm, Process Id 14. ANR2240I Database volume F:\TIVOLI\DB\DB05.TSM defined. ANR0986I Process 14 for DEFINE DBVOLUME running in the BACKGROUND processed 1 items for a total of 1,049,624,576 bytes with a completion state of SUCCESS at 04:57:47. But so far when I type the Q DB command, the information about occupancy is 93.2 %. What can I do to reduce this occupancy I haven´t experience in DB Adm. Thanks a lot... Luciano
Re: Antwort: Re: database expiration Problem / Domino TDP leaves old databases
Sorry, 42 days not 60 as I posted before. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Holger Bitterlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16.07.2002 15:56 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Antwort: Re: database expiration Problem / Domino TDP leaves old databases Del, you`re right, of course. I thougt it works like the TDP fpr Oracle, where RMAN is in charge. We made the incremental on the 5th of july and our policy says that we retain data for 42 Days. So we should see a large decrease after 42 days,... . Thanks -- Holger Bitterlich Stadtsparkasse Köln Organisation und Datenverarbeitung Telefon: (0221) 226 - 54 18 Fax: (0221) 226- 51 00 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sk-koeln.de > Holger, > > Expiration of Domino database backups happens automatically according > to your policy settings. When you back up a new database, the previous > backups will follow the policies that you have set up for inactive > versions. > This works the same way that the standard TSM file-level backup > client works. If you do not think it is working correctly, > it's probably time for you to call IBM support. > > Thanks, > > Del > > > > Del Hoobler > IBM Corporation > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - Live your life as an exclamation, not an explanation. > - Strive for excellence, not perfection. > Da E-Mails leicht unter fremdem Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden koennen, muessen wir zu Ihrem und unserem Schutz die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit der vorstehenden Erklaerungen ausschliessen. Die fuer die Stadtsparkasse Koeln geltenden Regeln ueber die Verbindlichkeit von rechtsgeschaeftlichen Erklaerungen mit verpflichtendem Inhalt bleiben unberuehrt.
Re: database expiration Problem / Domino TDP leaves old databases
But according to your policy settings you must now wait 60 days for actual data deletion (expire interval) Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Holger Bitterlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16.07.2002 14:36 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:database expiration Problem / Domino TDP leaves old databases Dear Josef, your hint was successful, but only the tdp way. We could see, that after doing a incremental backup there were 5500 transaction logs discarded. So on the first stage we were happy. But, the expiration of the db and the reclaim didn`t free up as much as expected. It looks like that the expire only scans the first 1/5 of the db. Therefore the expire discards only a very few db-objects and the aftergoing reclaimation process could free up only a few tapes. The "funny side" (ouch ! ) is that the expire process ends always with a state of success. But we could swear there MUST be a lot more db objects to inspect. Maybe this happens some time before we dealed with the tdp stuff. So I belive we have another problem, this time a db Problem. Anybody any ideas ??? -- Holger Bitterlich Stadtsparkasse Köln Organisation und Datenverarbeitung Telefon: (0221) 226 - 54 18 Fax: (0221) 226- 51 00 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sk-koeln.de "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 12.07.2002 09:01:37: > Hi Holger, > I think I now what is wrong. Acording to your first mail, you are only > running schedules which perform archiving of transaction logs, > inactivating this logs and regular selective backup of databases. And this > is the problem. In order to inactivate deleted database backups you must > run incremental backup of databases. You do not neet to run it very often > but you must run it occasionaly. This is the only way how to inactivate > backups of deleted databases. > > Hope this helps > > Ing. Jozef Zatko > Login a.s. > Dlha 2, Stupava > tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Da E-Mails leicht unter fremdem Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden koennen, muessen wir zu Ihrem und unserem Schutz die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit der vorstehenden Erklaerungen ausschliessen. Die fuer die Stadtsparkasse Koeln geltenden Regeln ueber die Verbindlichkeit von rechtsgeschaeftlichen Erklaerungen mit verpflichtendem Inhalt bleiben unberuehrt.
Re: solaris expert needed
Acording to Tivoli web site, this library is supported from TSM 4.2. Do you have at least this version of TSM server and TSM device driver? And another point: try to use native Solaris tape driver - st. In st.conf put the same as in your mt.conf and change "mt" to "st". Then try "add_drv st" command. If this will work you are sure your HW is OK. Hope this helps. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Gerald Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12.07.2002 01:44 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:solaris expert needed Well I'm making progress but something is clearly still wrong. I started a call with Tivoli but I'm waiting to hear back from them. If anyone see's anything obvious that I'm doing wrong let me know as I'm not very good with solaris specific device driver configuration: bash-2.03# cat lb.conf | grep -v "#" name="lb" class="scsi" target=0 lun=0; name="lb" class="scsi" target=6 lun=1; bash-2.03# cat mt.conf | grep -v "#" name="mt" class="scsi" target=1 lun=0; name="mt" class="scsi" target=2 lun=0; bash-2.03# cat op.conf | grep -v "#" name="op" class="scsi" target=1 lun=0; name="op" class="scsi" target=2 lun=0; name="op" class="scsi" target=3 lun=0; name="op" class="scsi" target=4 lun=0; name="op" class="scsi" target=5 lun=0; name="op" class="scsi" target=6 lun=0; name="op" class="scsi" target=2 lun=1; name="op" class="scsi" target=3 lun=1; name="op" class="scsi" target=4 lun=1; name="op" class="scsi" target=5 lun=1; bash-2.03# /usr/sbin/add_drv lb devfsadm: driver failed to attach: lb Warning: Driver (lb) successfully added to system but failed to attach bash-2.03# /usr/sbin/add_drv mt devfsadm: driver failed to attach: mt Warning: Driver (mt) successfully added to system but failed to attach bash-2.03# /usr/sbin/add_drv op bash-2.03# ls /dev/rmt 0op 0opt 1op 1opt 2op 2opt 3op 3opt 4op 4opt 5op 5opt 6op 6opt 7op 7opt 8op 8opt 9op 9opt bash-2.03# Gerald Wichmann Senior Systems Development Engineer Zantaz, Inc. 925.598.3099 (w)
Re: solaris experts plz help
Hi Gerald, if I understand you are confused from having more devices with the same SCSI target and LUN. It is OK. Theese targets and LUNs are on different SCSI adapters or different SCSI channels on one SCSI adapter. When you run add_drv command, system checks all devices with specified target and LUN (from conf file) on all adapters. In Solaris theese devices have actualy special device file in different subdirectory under /device directory. If you get error messages from add_drv command, usually there is problem with SCSI connection or TSM device driver support. Acording to your output from probe-scsi-all your SCSI connection seems to be all right. Have you checked if your tape and optical drives are supported in TSM version you are using? Oh, what is your version of TSM? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Gerald Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11.07.2002 18:20 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: solaris experts plz help Yes that's actually a typo (the "lb" in places where it should be "op" or "mt"). My conf files are correct in that sense (i.e. I wasn't cutting/pasting them). The problem I'm having is I'm not sure how to interpret what LUN a device is on or what the TARGET is by looking at the output from probe-scsi-all.. Gerald Wichmann Senior Systems Development Engineer Zantaz, Inc. 925.598.3099 (w) -Original Message- From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: solaris experts plz help Hello Gerald, you have to change your conf files like this: lb.conf if the scsi target and luns for your libraries are OK, you do not have to change this file. op.conf replace all "lb" with "op" (in this file you define only optical drives, not changer). For each optical drive create one stanza with correct target and lun of each drive (so you will have 10 stanzas in your conf file). Example Name="op" class="scsi" Target=X lun=Y; X is SCSI target ID of optical drive and Y is LUN of that drive mt.conf here replace "lb" with "mt" (in this file you define only tape drives, not changer). For each tape drive create one stanza with correct target and lun of each drive (so you will have 4 stanzas in your conf file). Example Name="mt" class="scsi" Target=X lun=Y; X is SCSI target ID of tape drive and Y is LUN of that drive Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Gerald Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11.07.2002 01:14 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:solaris experts plz help Below is the output of my server's probe-scsi-all.. I have 2 ATL M1500 LTO libraries with 2 drives each, and one HP 1200ex optical library with 10 optical drives. I need to populate the "mt.conf", "lb.conf", and "op.conf" files accordingly but what I've done doesn't seem to be working. When doing the add_drv command, it loads the device driver but then fails to attach. When I do add_drv for "op" it works but I only get a "0op" and "1op" so I'm not sure why it didn't pick up 10 drives. So my first question is, what do I put in the various conf files? I'm not as familiar with solaris so could use some help. Currently my files look like this: Lb.conf Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=5 lun=0; Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=0; Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=1; Op.conf Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=0; Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=1; Mt.conf Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=5 lun=0; Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=0; Probe-scsi-all: /pci@1f,2000/pci@1/scsi@5 Target 0 Unit 0 Removable Medium changerM4 DATA MagFile 2.10 Target 1 Unit 0 Removable Tape HP Ultrium 1-SCSI E15V Target 2 Unit 0 Removable Tape HP Ultrium 1-SCSI E15V /pci@1f,2000/pci@1/scsi@4 Target 0 Unit 0 Removable Medium changerM4 DATA MagFile 2.10 Target 1 Unit 0 Removable Tape HP Ultrium 1-SCSI E15V Target 2 Unit 0 Removable Tape HP Ultrium 1-SCSI E15V /pci@1f,4000/scsi@4,1 Target 2 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 3 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7
Re: Antwort: Re: Domino TDP leaves old databases, second try
Hi Holger, I think I now what is wrong. Acording to your first mail, you are only running schedules which perform archiving of transaction logs, inactivating this logs and regular selective backup of databases. And this is the problem. In order to inactivate deleted database backups you must run incremental backup of databases. You do not neet to run it very often but you must run it occasionaly. This is the only way how to inactivate backups of deleted databases. Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Holger Bitterlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11.07.2002 14:20 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Antwort: Re: Domino TDP leaves old databases, second try Hi Josef, this is the policy setting: Policy Domain Name NT_NOTES Policy Set Name ACTIVE Mgmt Class Name MC_NT_NOTES Copy Group Name STANDARD Versions Data Exists 5 Versions Data Deleted 1 Retain Extra Versions30 Retain Only Version 60 Copy Mode MODIFIED Copy Serialization SHRDYNAMIC Copy Frequency 0 In my opionion the last backuped file should go away at the 60th day after beeing deleted at Domino Server. But it does not ,... . Have you got an idea ? Thank you ! -- Holger Bitterlich Stadtsparkasse Köln Organisation und Datenverarbeitung Telefon: (0221) 226 - 54 18 Fax: (0221) 226- 51 00 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sk-koeln.de "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 11.07.2002 11:53:59: > Hi Holger > what is your policy settings for data from Domino server (copy group > setting from management class under which is Domino data backuped)? > > > Ing. Jozef Zatko > Login a.s. > Dlha 2, Stupava > tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 > > > > > Holger Bitterlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 11.07.2002 09:15 > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject:Domino TDP leaves old databases, second try > > > I need your help! I posted the following, but Michael was the only one > with > ideas. But unfortunately that was no solution to my problem. So, has > anybody an idea? > > Here `s the full story: > > Hi *sm`ers > > > > the amount of data pertaining our Lotus Domino Servers is enlarging > > enormous. The domino guys tell me that they can restore very old > databases > > although the domino db`s are deleted a long time ago. When we try to > > restore such an old database which on the domino server has been deleted > a > > long time ago, we still see the last version of this db. How can this > > happen ? > > Since we backup the transaction logs every hour there is a second > problem. > > The transaction log backups are retained - no deletion happened ! > > Why is no Log inactivated ? > > > > We use TSM 3.7.3 on server side, and tsm 4.1.16 with TDP for Domino > 1.1.2 > > on Client side. > > > > Our translog backup script looks like this: > > > > set domlogdir=c:\ssw\tivoli\tsm\log\online_nt_dom_tlog.log > > domdsmc arch /logfile=%domlogdir% > > domdsmc inactivate /logfile=%domlogdir% > > > > > > The log output is: > > > > Total Domino transaction log files ready for archive: 4 > > Total Domino transaction log files archived: 4 > > Throughput rate: 5,193.11 Kb/Sec > > Total bytes transferred: 268,439,552 > > Elapsed processing time: 50.48 Secs > > Tivoli Storage Manager > > Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1, Level > 2.0 > > (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2001. All rights reserved. > > License file exists and contains valid license data. > > ACD5221I The C:\ssw\Tivoli\TSM\domino\domdsm.log log file has been > pruned > > successfully. > > Number of Logs Inactivated: 0 > > > > > > The weekly online backup script is like that: > > > > set logdir=c:\ssw\tivoli\tsm\log\domdsm.log > > domdsmc selective * /subdir=yes /logfile=%domlogdir% >> %logdir% > > domdsmc inactivate /logfile=%domlogdir% >> %logdir% > > > > > > and the output reads like this: > > > > Total Domino databases inspected: 4,
Re: Domino TDP leaves old databases, second try
Hi Holger what is your policy settings for data from Domino server (copy group setting from management class under which is Domino data backuped)? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Holger Bitterlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11.07.2002 09:15 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Domino TDP leaves old databases, second try I need your help! I posted the following, but Michael was the only one with ideas. But unfortunately that was no solution to my problem. So, has anybody an idea? Here `s the full story: Hi *sm`ers > > the amount of data pertaining our Lotus Domino Servers is enlarging > enormous. The domino guys tell me that they can restore very old databases > although the domino db`s are deleted a long time ago. When we try to > restore such an old database which on the domino server has been deleted a > long time ago, we still see the last version of this db. How can this > happen ? > Since we backup the transaction logs every hour there is a second problem. > The transaction log backups are retained - no deletion happened ! > Why is no Log inactivated ? > > We use TSM 3.7.3 on server side, and tsm 4.1.16 with TDP for Domino 1.1.2 > on Client side. > > Our translog backup script looks like this: > > set domlogdir=c:\ssw\tivoli\tsm\log\online_nt_dom_tlog.log > domdsmc arch /logfile=%domlogdir% > domdsmc inactivate /logfile=%domlogdir% > > > The log output is: > > Total Domino transaction log files ready for archive: 4 > Total Domino transaction log files archived: 4 > Throughput rate: 5,193.11 Kb/Sec > Total bytes transferred: 268,439,552 > Elapsed processing time: 50.48 Secs > Tivoli Storage Manager > Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1, Level 2.0 > (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2001. All rights reserved. > License file exists and contains valid license data. > ACD5221I The C:\ssw\Tivoli\TSM\domino\domdsm.log log file has been pruned > successfully. > Number of Logs Inactivated: 0 > > > The weekly online backup script is like that: > > set logdir=c:\ssw\tivoli\tsm\log\domdsm.log > domdsmc selective * /subdir=yes /logfile=%domlogdir% >> %logdir% > domdsmc inactivate /logfile=%domlogdir% >> %logdir% > > > and the output reads like this: > > Total Domino databases inspected: 4,433 > Total Domino databases backed up: 4,433 > Total Domino databases excluded: 0 > Throughput rate: 4,820.92 Kb/Sec > Total bytes transferred: 99,557,318,730 > Elapsed processing time: 20,167.09 Secs > Tivoli Storage Manager > Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1, Level 2.0 > (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2001. All rights reserved. > License file exists and contains valid license data. > ACD5221I The c:\ssw\tivoli\tsm\log\domdsm.log log file has been pruned > successfully. > Number of Logs Inactivated: 0 > > > > Thank you ! "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 09.07.2002 15:50:45: > Hi Holger, > with TDP for Lotus Domino every database is treated as if it was one filespace. > On your TSM Server you can see this using "q files > ". > > Like with the ba-client TSM updates the filespace when you perform an > incremental backup and otherwise leaves the filespace as it > is. So when you stop backing up a certain filespace (=domino database), this > filespaces active files (documents) will stay unchanged > in TSM forever. > > When you want to discontinue backing up a database and you don't want to keep > this db in TSM, just delete it using "delete files > " in the admin interface (dsmadmc). > > Good luck, > regards, > Michael > -- > Michael Bartl, Dipl. Inform. (FH) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Backup Services, IT Ops Germany/Austria Tel: +49-89-92699-806 > Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH. Fax: +49-89-92699-302 > Landsberger Str. 155, D-80687 Muenchen http://www.cw.com/de > - Hi Michael, when we do a 'q files nodename' the result looks like This: Node Name Filespace
Re: solaris experts plz help
Hello Gerald, you have to change your conf files like this: lb.conf if the scsi target and luns for your libraries are OK, you do not have to change this file. op.conf replace all "lb" with "op" (in this file you define only optical drives, not changer). For each optical drive create one stanza with correct target and lun of each drive (so you will have 10 stanzas in your conf file). Example Name="op" class="scsi" Target=X lun=Y; X is SCSI target ID of optical drive and Y is LUN of that drive mt.conf here replace "lb" with "mt" (in this file you define only tape drives, not changer). For each tape drive create one stanza with correct target and lun of each drive (so you will have 4 stanzas in your conf file). Example Name="mt" class="scsi" Target=X lun=Y; X is SCSI target ID of tape drive and Y is LUN of that drive Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Gerald Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11.07.2002 01:14 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:solaris experts plz help Below is the output of my server's probe-scsi-all.. I have 2 ATL M1500 LTO libraries with 2 drives each, and one HP 1200ex optical library with 10 optical drives. I need to populate the "mt.conf", "lb.conf", and "op.conf" files accordingly but what I've done doesn't seem to be working. When doing the add_drv command, it loads the device driver but then fails to attach. When I do add_drv for "op" it works but I only get a "0op" and "1op" so I'm not sure why it didn't pick up 10 drives. So my first question is, what do I put in the various conf files? I'm not as familiar with solaris so could use some help. Currently my files look like this: Lb.conf Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=5 lun=0; Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=0; Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=1; Op.conf Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=0; Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=1; Mt.conf Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=5 lun=0; Name="lb" class="scsi" Target=4 lun=0; Probe-scsi-all: /pci@1f,2000/pci@1/scsi@5 Target 0 Unit 0 Removable Medium changerM4 DATA MagFile 2.10 Target 1 Unit 0 Removable Tape HP Ultrium 1-SCSI E15V Target 2 Unit 0 Removable Tape HP Ultrium 1-SCSI E15V /pci@1f,2000/pci@1/scsi@4 Target 0 Unit 0 Removable Medium changerM4 DATA MagFile 2.10 Target 1 Unit 0 Removable Tape HP Ultrium 1-SCSI E15V Target 2 Unit 0 Removable Tape HP Ultrium 1-SCSI E15V /pci@1f,4000/scsi@4,1 Target 2 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 3 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 4 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 5 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 6 Unit 0 Removable Device type 8 HP C1107J 1.40 /pci@1f,4000/scsi@4 Target 1 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 2 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 3 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 4 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 5 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Target 6 Unit 0 Removable Device type 7 HP C1113J 1.10 Gerald Wichmann Senior Systems Development Engineer Zantaz, Inc. 925.598.3099 (w)
Re: checkin & label scratch volumes
Robert, if volumes are alredy labeled and you only need insert them to library, use checkin libv command. If volumes are not yet labeled, you must label them with label libv command. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Robert Ouzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03.07.2002 13:30 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:checkin & label scratch volumes Hi I have a scalar 1000 library and need to add a lot of new scratch volumes. Can I do just a: checkin libv scalar status=scratch search=bulk checklabel=barcode or I need the first time to do: label libv scalar checkin=scratch search=bulk labelsource=barcode volrange=01,50 When I did a label libv each cartridge was mounted in the drive and the process can take a long time. Regards Robert Ouzen
Re: Technical question.
Christian, there is no problem to run two TSM servers on one machine. You can have on both machines installed two TSM servers (one active and second inactive but ready to use in case of fail). Then, when one of them fail, you can restore its database (from latest backup) on second machine and run both servers simultaneously. Or you can backup TSM database on each other via server-to-server configuration. Another question is if you need to automate this proces. Probably the best solution would be to use cluster (if it is possible, as I do not know your platform, servers location and so on). Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Christian Astuni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06.06.2002 15:55 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Technical question. Hi at all ... I have a technical question and I try to explain in good form. If I have a 2 servers with TSM, for example TSM1 and TSM2. The server TSM1 make a backups a one group of server "GROUP1" and TSM2 make a backups a other group "GROUP2". My cuestion is: In case of fail the TSM1 is posible perform a backup a GROUP1 with the other server of tsm "TSM2" with the same tsm database of TSM1. Is possible to have a two databases in one tsm server and active or inactive each one in different times ? If not possible the are any altenative or make this in other way. Thank you very much for theirs help !!! Best Regards Christian Astuni
Re: solaris tsm server
Gerald, device file /dev/rmt/0mt is for drive, not for library. You should have in your /dev/rmt directory something like xlb, where x is number which depend on the order, in which you run add_drv commands for drives and library. It does not matter what this number is, but you have to have this file in your /dev/rmt directory and use it in def libr command. Sample content of my directory /dev/rmt is: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 45 Feb 22 15:03 0lb -> ../../devices/pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@3/lb@0,0:lb lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 46 Feb 22 15:03 0lbt -> ../../devices/pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@3/lb@0,0:lbt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 45 Feb 22 15:03 1mt -> ../../devices/pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@3/mt@5,0:mt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 46 Feb 22 15:03 1mtn -> ../../devices/pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@3/mt@5,0:mtn lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 46 Feb 22 15:03 1mtt -> ../../devices/pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@3/mt@5,0:mtt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 45 Feb 22 15:03 2mt -> ../../devices/pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@3/mt@6,0:mt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 46 Feb 22 15:03 2mtn -> ../../devices/pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@3/mt@6,0:mtn lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 46 Feb 22 15:03 2mtt -> ../../devices/pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@3/mt@6,0:mtt Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 I'm not all that familiar with running TSM on solaris.. trying to configure an ATL tape library on a test box I have here. When I define the library it crashes the TSM server: 05/14/02 17:58:01 ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: DEFINE LIBR lib_tape_1 libt=scsi devi=/dev/rmt/0mt 05/14/02 18:09:14 ANRD mmstxn.c(219): ThreadId<42> Lock acquisition (sLock) failed for MMS universe lock. 05/14/02 18:09:14 ANR2033E QUERY LIBRARY: Command failed - lock conflict. 05/14/02 18:09:14 ANRD mmstxn.c(219): ThreadId<40> Lock acquisition (sLock) failed for MMS universe lock. 05/14/02 18:09:14 ANR2033E QUERY LIBRARY: Command failed - lock conflict. 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANR7824S Server operation terminated. 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANR7823S Internal error LOCKCYCLE02 detected. 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANRD Trace-back of called functions: 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANRD 0x0001000837CC pkAbort 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANRD 0x000100083858 pkLogicAbort 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANRD 0x0001009865EC CheckLockCycles 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANRD 0x000100982080 TmFindDeadlock 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANRD 0x000100981D60 TmDeadlockDetector 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANRD 0x000100087818 StartThread 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANRD 0x7EC1F844 *UNKNOWN* 05/14/2002 18:12:57 ANRD 0x000100087710 StartThread my question is whats going on here? It's possible I suppose I might have the device wrong.. It's fairly likely I don't have the ATL library device driver loaded as well. How would I check this on solaris? How do I determine what device the library and it's drives are? I'm guessing that's probably my problem here (a lack of solaris knowledge). Appreciate any feedback. Regards, Gerald Wichmann Senior Systems Development Engineer Zantaz, Inc. 925.598.3099 (w)
Re: SUN FC HBA adapter
Bern, thank you for your advice. But I have non IBM DLT drive. The problem is, that software driver for my HBA does not create standard SCSI devices (with SCSI target and LUN) in Solaris, so it is not possible to use TSM device driver, which is AFAIK, driven to use only SCSI devices. This is part of my messages file: /pci@4,4000/SUNW,qlc@3/fp@0,0/st@w10e00221f7f5,0 (st85): May 7 18:32:53 tsm May 7 18:32:53 tsm unix: st85 at fp0: May 7 18:32:53 tsm unix: name w10e00221f7f5,0, bus address 1 May 7 18:32:53 tsm unix: st85 is /pci@4,4000/SUNW,qlc@3/fp@0,0/st@w10e00221f7f5,0 May 7 18:32:53 tsm unix: /pci@4,4000/SUNW,qlc@3/fp@0,0/st@w10e00221f7f5,0 (st85) online AFAIK TSM device driver for nonIBM devices support only SCSI devices, not FC devices. Or am I missing something? Now I am going to change Fcode in HBA so that it will be original Qlogic 2200 and I will use Qlogic device drivers. According to Tivoli it should be supported configuration. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Bern Ruelas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09.05.2002 20:11 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: SUN FC HBA adapter Hello Jozef, I just got thru doing something like this with a similar setup: we use Emulex LP8000 cards for the HBA's onto an IBM 3584 with LTO drives and a Mcdata switch. There are 4 things that need to be done or it won't work: 0. Ensure that you've moved the /kernel/drv/st.conf somewhere else. Solaris will try and grab your scsi tape devices otherwise. 1. Make sure your fabric is set up correctly and that at boot up (ck the /var/adm/messages files) you see your IBMtape device drivers and HBA acquired targets. Here's a clip of what I'm talking about: May 3 18:04:35 bst7-1 unix: IBMtape254 at lpfc1: May 3 18:04:35 bst7-1 unix: IBMtape178 at lpfc1: May 3 18:04:35 bst7-1 unix: NOTICE: lpfc1: Acquired FCP/SCSI Target 9 LUN 1 May 3 18:04:35 bst7-1 unix: NOTICE: lpfc1: Acquired FCP/SCSI Target 9 LUN 2 May 3 18:04:35 bst7-1 unix: NOTICE: lpfc1: Acquired FCP/SCSI Target 9 LUN 3 3. Next check that your /usr/kernel/drv/IBMtape.conf file has the requisite objects not #'d out. We typically leave all 16 instances open. Bern Ruelas Sr. Systems Engineer - Storage Cadence Design Systems -Original Message- From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SUN FC HBA adapter Helo *SM-ers In my test environment I am trying to connect TSM server on Solaris to SAN-attached SCSI library Compaq TL891. My environment is as follows: TSM server 4.2.1.9 on Sun Solaris 2.8 with Sun PCI FC HBA (OEM of Qlogic 2200) - part No. X6799A with device driver Qlogic FCA Driver v0.40.5. Library contains one Quantum DLT7000 drive and is attached to Crossroads 4250. TSM server and Crossroads are attached to FC switch Brocade Silkworm. In Solaris I can see DLT drive and Library, but when I try to use TSM device driver (using command "add_drv mt") it runs without any error messages, but it does not create special device file in directory /dev/rmt. Does anyone of you, guys, have gone through this with success? If yes, can you please share your configuration and versions of device drivers, firmware and so on? I am also going to ask Tivoli support if Sun FC HBA has already been tested with TSM. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
TSM 5.1 and Downlevel client code error
Hi *SMers in TSM 4.x is a problem with downlevel client code error if you mistakenly or intentionaly connect to TSM server with TSM b/a klient on W2k/NT under different node name with different platform (UNIX, Novell,..). There was a promise from Tivoli to solve this problem in future versions. Does anybody know if this problem is solved in TSM 5.1? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: LANFREE Backups - Feedback?
Petur, you say that restores with SAN agent go through LAN regardles of configuration. Is it true??? According to doc, restores should also go through SAN. Or is it something special with Connectrix? Or am I missing something? Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Petur Ey?orsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05.03.2002 09:42 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: LANFREE Backups - Feedback? hi Denis if you ask for my opinion i do not recomend lanfree backups, why thats spimle when you do a restore it dosn?t matter if your using san or not youre restore data always goes trough the lan. and that?s bad, then you have lost 75% of your reason to have lanfree backups, because what is here that relay matters. It is your restore time, and that will stay exacly the same. This bug will not be fixed until TSM V 5.1 comes out. Kvedja/Regards Petur Eythorsson Taeknimadur/Technician IBM Certified Specialist - AIX Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional Microsoft Certified System Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nyherji Hf Simi TEL: +354-569-7700 Borgartun 37105 Iceland URL:http://www.nyherji.is -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Denis L'Huillier Sent: 4. mars 2002 20:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LANFREE Backups - Feedback? Hello, We are currently evaluating the implementation of lanfree backups in our environment. I understand the conceptual benefits of sending data across the SAN vs. the LAN/WAN but am concerned with compatibility issues with our IBM TSM Environment and EMC Connectrix Environment. Has anybody implemented LANFREE in a similar environment? Can anybody give some example or insight to real life advantages to implementing LANFREE backups? Are there any tape drive contention issues when a drive gets allocated to a 'LANFREE' backup? How does TSM manage 'LANFREE' tapes? Does it dedicate a tape to a client (like collocation) or will other clients have access to write data to the same volser? How about attaching a 3590 FC-AL to a EMC Connectrix Fabric? Any other tips would be greatly appreciated. TSM Environment: 1 H50, AIX 4.3.3 TSM 3.7 - SSA Disk 3494 2 Frames 4 Scsi Drives 1 H50, AIX 4.3.3 TSM 3.7 - SSA Disk 3494 2 Frames 4 Scsi Drives 1 H50, AIX 4.3.3 TSM 3.7 - SSA Disk 3494 5 Frames 6 Scsi Drives 1 H80, AIX 4.3.3 TSM 4.1 - SSA Disk 3494 6 Frames 6 Scsi Drives SAN Environment: EMC Symmetrix ( 8730, 8830, 4 3930's, 3700 ) EMC Connectrix - 12 Switches Client/Server Environment: 600 + Servers (HPUX, Solaris, NT, Win2K) approx 200 EMC SAN attached. (No BCV's used or SRDF.. yet) Thanks in advance. Regards, Denis L. L'Huiller 973-360-7739 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enterprise Storage Forms -> http://admpwb01/misc/misc/storage_forms_main.html
Re: Question regarding including an excluded type of file.
James, I think that better solution is to use FREQUENCY parameter in copy group definition of your new management class. Set it to 7 days if you want to backup .pst files once a week. Then you do not need two schedules. Also you will have to include .pst files in dsm.opt. Hope this helps. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 "James, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 26.02.2002 17:21 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Question regarding including an excluded type of file. We are also opening an issue Tivoli, but we seem to get faster and better results from our comrades on the list server. This is our problem: We are drowning in pst files, which are "changed" each time an individual opens his e-mail. We have made a corporate decision to back these up once each weekend, and exclude them the rest of the week. These are the steps that we have taken: 1. On each NT server, we have excluded all files that end in "pst." Exclude *:\...\*.pst 2. I created a new management class through the web interface, called "pstfiles," with versions data deleted set to 4, and retain extra versions set for 90 days. Even though the excluded files would normally be deleted, this management class will keep 4 sets inactive. 3. I created two new schedules, one to run on Friday evening and one Saturday evening, figuring that one will successfully back up the pst files. THE PROBLEM is that I cannot successfully code the include statement on the schedule through the web interface. My intent is to Include *:\...\*.pst pstfiles . This should override the exclude statement in the dsm.opt file, backup the pst files and associate them with the management class pstfiles. On the Object line of the web interface, I have tried variations of the following commands: Include *:\...\*.pst pstfiles The word "include" was not needed. *:\...\*.pst pstfiles TSM attempted to backup pst files, and a separate filesystem pstfiles. '*:\...\*.pst pstfiles' TSM failed to associate pst files with the management class. "'*:\...\*.pst pstfiles'" The double quotes were replaced with a square, I presume because TSM did not recognize the symbol. Does anyone have a recommendation as to how to best handle this? Doug James Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
Re: Local DAT-Drive for UNLOADDB
Hi Christoph, check mount limit of your device class. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Christoph Pilgram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 29.01.2002 14:41 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Local DAT-Drive for UNLOADDB Hi all, on my testserver (AIX 4.3.3 / TSM 4.14 ) I tried to get the local DAT-drive as output-device for a test of unloaddb/loaddb going. Defined a 'manuel library' called 'LOC_DEV' Defined a 'manuel drive' called 'DAT1' pointing to '/dev/rmt0' with Library Name 'LOC_DEV' Defined a '4mm device class' called 'DAT' with 'recording format ' DDS3C', 'library name' = 'LOC_DEV' Labelling a volume with 'label libvol LOC_DEV vol001' seems to work : ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: LABEL LIBVOLUME LOC_DEV vol001 OVERWRITE=YES ANR0984I Process 3 for LABEL LIBVOLUME started in the BACKGROUND at 14:24:40. ANR8799I LABEL LIBVOLUME: Operation for library LOC_DEV started as process 3. ANR8326I 002: Mount GENERICTAPE volume VOL001 R/W in drive DAT1 (/dev/rmt0) of library LOC_DEV within 60 minutes. ANR0609I LABEL LIBVOLUME started as process 3. ANR8372I 002: Remove GENERICTAPE volume VOL001 from drive DAT1 (/dev/rmt0) of library LOC_DEV. ANR8800I LABEL LIBVOLUME for volume VOL001 in library LOC_DEV completed successfully. ANR0985I Process 3 for LABEL LIBVOLUME running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state SUCCESS at 14:27:38. Then I tried to make a dbbackup to the device class 'DAT', type 'FULL' on volume 'vol001' an d got the following error : ANR2280I Full database backup started as process 4. ANR4571E Database backup/restore terminated - insufficient number of mount points available for removable media. ANR0985I Process 4 for DATABASE BACKUP running in the FOREGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 14:28:57. My question : where do I have to set the number of mountpoints other then in the the '4mm device class' or do I have enywhere else a wrong definition ? Thanks for help Chris
Re: Excluding Files from backup on Different Days.
Hello Chad, create new management class (newmgmt for example) for .pst files and use include ... statement to assign this mgmt class to them. include ?:\...\*.pst newmgmt In newmgmt class set "frequency" parameter in copy group definition to 7 (if you want backup pst files once a week). Thats it Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 "Gent, Chad E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18.01.2002 15:03 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Excluding Files from backup on Different Days. Hello All, I have a TSM Client 4.2.1 on Windows NT 4. I would like to exclude all PST files in my backup. (exclude ?:*.pst) But now management has requested that we backup these files once a week. Is there a way in my option file or on the TSM Server that I can set this up to backup my pst files once a week. Any help would be great! Chad
Re: DB2 SQL2062N Reason code: "420"
Hello Malbourgh, the server you have upgraded was TSM server or server where you have TSM client with DB2 database? Can you send the content of your dsm.sys (if you are using separate dsm.sys for ba and api send both of them)? I had the same problem and the solution was to use Passworddrir option in dsm.sys because my ba client was using the same password file as my api client (I used separate dsm.sys for ba and api and I had the same server name in both of them). By the way, what level is DB2? In older versions of DB2 was ADSM client included and it is recomended not to use this client but latest TSM api client. Check your paths to make sure you dont have mixed versions of TSM and ADSM api clients. Hope this helps Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 "Malbrough, Demetrius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16.01.2002 17:32 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:DB2 SQL2062N Reason code: "420" Good morning, SM*ers! I upgraded the AIX 4.3.3 server to TS 4.2.1.0 a couple of days ago and ever since that the DB2 client has been logging this message in the dsierror.log: SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media "/u/archive/sqllib/adsm/libadsm.a". Reason code: "420". I verified that the DSMI_CONFIG & DIR was set correctly and the db2profile does NOT have these settings to over-rule. The permissions on the dsm.sys & .opt files are usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin>ls -l dsm.sys -rw-r--r-- 1 root system 1103 Nov 21 07:36 dsm.sys usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin>ls -l dsm.opt -rw-r--r-- 1 root system 882 Jun 12 2001 dsm.opt I have ran out of clues Please assist if you can! Thanks, Demetrius A. Malbrough UNIX/Tivoli Systems Admin
Disk volumes with UNC
Hi *SM*ers I was looking documentation and I can not find answer for this question: is it supported to use UNC names for disk volumes in TSM server 4.2 on Windows? I do not have enough disk capacity on TSM server, so I would like to use disk from another Windows server. The problem with mapped drive is that after restart is not available to TSM service until logon of user. Thanks and regards Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Re: Fileclass Mounting problem (unable to reclaim to tape)
Eugene, try to check mountlimit in devclas FILECLASS and in LTO_DEV1 using command q devcl fileclass f=d In devclass FILECLASS there should be no higher mount limit than in devclass LTO_DEV1. Hope this helps. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Eugene Awyong - Singapore To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: MSUNG.COM> Subject: Fileclass Mounting problem (unable to reclaim to tape) Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 16.11.2001 09:50 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi, I'm trying to reclaim or 'push' my data from my fileclass to a tape, but they don't seem to be working. All they do is to wait to be mounted, but I can't seem to be able to mount them, can anyone help me figure out what I should be doing? tsm: SAPROD>q libvo Library Name Volume Name Status Owner Last Use Home Element --- -- -- - LTO_LIB1 SA2_004 Scratch 6 LTO_LIB1 SA2_005 Scratch 1 LTO_LIB1 SA2_010 Scratch 2 LTO_LIB1 SA2_020 Scratch 3 tsm: SAPROD>q vol Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - /tsmreclaim/28FC.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 85.4 Full /tsmreclaim/28FD.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/28FE.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/28FF.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2900.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2901.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2902.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2903.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2904.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2905.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2906.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 1.6 Full /tsmreclaim/291B.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS3.9 74.5 Full /tsmreclaim/291C.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/291D.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/291E.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/291F.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2920.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2921.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2922.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2923.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2924.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2925.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2926.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2927.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2928.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2929.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/292A.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/292B.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/292C.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/292D.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS3.8 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/292E.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/292F.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full more... ( to continue, 'C' to cancel) /tsmreclaim/2930.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2931.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/2932.BFS RECLAIMPOOL FILECLASS4.0 100.0 Full /tsmreclaim/0
Re: Delete Deviceclass giving me problems! Help!
Eugene, try to check if you do not have some old dbbackup, which was done using LTO_DEV2 devclas, and which is stil in volhistory. q volhist type=dbb I hope this will help Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Eugene Awyong - Singapore To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: MSUNG.COM> Subject: Delete Deviceclass giving me problems! Help! Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 31.10.2001 13:50 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi, One of my servers has 2 LTO drives, of which the 2nd drive is being used as copy stgpool. But our management has decided to take away that second drive so that it can be installed in another server. So for the past hour or so, I have been updating our schedules etc so that nothing points to the 2nd LTO drive. Everything seems to be going fine, except one last thing! I can't seem to be able to do a 'delete devclass' of my 2nd LTO drive. Can any of you guys try to point out what's wrong? I've cracked my head but I can't seem to find any portion that points to the 2nd LTO device. This is what my dev classes look like: tsm: SAPROD>q devclass DeviceDevice Storage DeviceFormat Est/Max Mount Class AccessPool Type Capacity Limit Name Strategy Count (MB) - -- --- - -- -- DISK Random 0 FILECLASS Sequential 1 FILE 4.0 1 LTO_DEV1 Sequential 1 LTO DRIVE 1 LTO_DEV2 Sequential 0 LTO DRIVE 1 I'm trying to delete LTO_DEV2. Here's more info about it, followed by the error message I get when I try to delete the device. tsm: SAPROD>q devclass lto_dev2 f=d Device Class Name: LTO_DEV2 Device Access Strategy: Sequential Storage Pool Count: 0 Device Type: LTO Format: DRIVE Est/Max Capacity (MB): Mount Limit: 1 Mount Wait (min): 5 Mount Retention (min): 20 Label Prefix: ADSM Library: LTO_LIB2 Directory: Server Name: Retry Period: Retry Interval: Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN Last Update Date/Time: 07/03/01 14:20:54 tsm: SAPROD>del dev lto_dev2 ANR2354E DELETE DEVCLASS: Device class LTO_DEV2 is still referenced by one or more storage pools, or database backup or export volumes. ANS8001I Return code 13. OK, so I think no big deal, it's probably still in use somewhere, so I go ahead and try to find out where it's being used. tsm: SAPROD>q stgpool StorageDevice Estimated Pct PctHighLow Next Stora- Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Migr MigMig ge Pool (MB) PctPct ------------ --- DAILYPOOL LTO_DEV1 55,901,573 4.0 10.0 90 70 .5 RECLAIMPOOLFILECLASS0.0 0.0 0.0 90 70 DAILYPOOL tsm: SAPROD>q stgpool f=d Storage Pool Name: DAILYPOOL Storage Pool Type: Primary Device Class Name: LTO_DEV1 Estimated Capacity (MB): 55,901,573.5 Pct Util: 4.0 Pct Migr: 10.0 Pct Logical: 100.0 High Mig Pct: 90 Low Mig Pct: 70 Migration Delay: 0 Migration Continue: Yes Migration Processes: Next Storage Pool: Reclaim Storage Pool: RECLAIMPOOL Maximum Size Threshold: No Limit Access: Read/Write Description: Overflow Location: Cache Migrated Files?: Collocate?: Yes Reclamation Threshold: 100 Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed: 200 Delay Period for Volume Reuse: 0 Day(s) Migration in Progress?: No Amount Migrated (MB): 0.00 Elapsed Migration Time (seconds): 0 Reclamation in Progress?: No Volume Being Migrated/Reclaimed: more... ( to continue, 'C' to cancel) Last Update by (administrator):
TSM4.2 on OS/390 with IBM3494
Hi *SMers, our customer wants to implement TSM on OS/390 with 3494 library. I would like to now some experiences with TSM4.2 on OS/390 with 3494 library. We have to decide between 4.1 and 4.2. Any experiences appreciated. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Slovakia
Re: Fake filespace?
Jack, zou can use virtualmountpoint option and then domain option. You will find details in "Using backup-archive clients for Unix" manual. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. IT consultant
