unsubscribe
- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
TSM Administrator - NYC
http://moodys.com/moodys/cust/careers/getJobDetail.asp?docid=B58E9DC9425 41E34852572420067A8E0 Let me know if any interest. Arthur - The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: Deleting a Volume in TSM
Kurt, the problem is that the volume name is * and there's no way that I am aware of to tell TSM that it's not a wild character, but rather a volume name. Arthur -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Beyers Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 12:50 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Deleting a Volume in TSM Arthur, Just run an 'audit vol volume_name fix=yes'. regards, Kurt Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager namens Kleynerman, Arthur Verzonden: wo 1/25/2006 3:34 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] Deleting a Volume in TSM Hi everyone, Does anyone know of a way to delete this volume? Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status --- -- - - *WSRV_TAPEFP LTO_DEVC 0.0 0.0 Empty Thanks, Arthur - The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Deleting a Volume in TSM
Hi everyone, Does anyone know of a way to delete this volume? Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status --- -- - - *WSRV_TAPEFP LTO_DEVC 0.0 0.0 Empty Thanks, Arthur - The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Can't Start TSM Server 5.3 on AIX 5.1
Hello TSM'ers: Following the upgrade of our server to TSM 5.3, it is not coming up, complaining that all sessions, including administrative, are disabled. The SERVER_CONSOLE admin id does not have sufficient privileges to re-enable the sessions. Has anyone experienced a similar problem and is there a way out? IBM is claiming that it's pretty much impossible to do anything at this point, short of restoring the database to an earlier version (we still have a backup of the server prior to the upgrade). I would appreciate anyone's assistance. Thanks in advance, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
ANR8216W Error sending data on socket 420. Reason 32.
Hello everyone: While restoring a backup of a SQL Backtrack database, I'm getting the following error and the backup fails: 13:22:33.59 dtsrecover[786508]: BMCBKS00242D(/task.cpp): TRACE 'C_TASK': c_Task::Output from: UNKNOWN: @@ERROR;obsi/adsm: FATAL: TSM: dsmGetObj or dsmGetData failed, return code: ANS0238E (RC2041) The sequence of calls is invalid. [task.cpp/] This shows up in the TSM server activity log at the same time: 08/11/05 13:22:33 ANR8216W Error sending data on socket 420. Reason 32. (SESSION: 39156) 08/11/05 13:22:33 ANR0514I Session 39156 closed volume SC1215. (SESSION: 39156) 08/11/05 13:22:33 ANR0480W Session 39156 for node PROD1_SYB (SQL-BACKTRACK) terminated - connection with client severed. (SESSION: 39156) 08/11/05 13:22:33 ANR8216W Error sending data on socket 420. Reason 32. (SESSION: 39156) We have just upgraded our TSM server to 5.3.1.3 (it is running on AIX 5.1.0.8). If anyone has encountered this problem, please let me know. Thanks in advance! Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Employment Opportunity in NYC
Please let me know if any interest: http://moodys.com/moodys/cust/careers/getJobDetail.asp?docid=5D50A7A0144 4D5588525702D00613275 Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: TSM 5.1.7.2 on AIX 5.1
We didn't have a hang problem with 5.1.6.5 and then we upgraded yesterday. Now backups are crawling and we have a hang problem. We're still trying to figure out what's wrong. -Original Message- From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 5.1.7.2 on AIX 5.1 How has 5.1.7.2 treated everyone? It was suggested by TSM support that I upgrade to this version from 5.1.5.4 to fix a hang problem. Thanks. Andy Carlson|\ _,,,---,,_ Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_ BJC Health Care|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
TSM 5.2
Hello, Does anyone know when TSM 5.2 is scheduled for release? Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: Retention policy for inactive files
Thanks for replying. What I need is to save all inactive from July 15, 2002 until September 15, 2002 and delete all inactive files from September 15 until now. I don't believe there is a way to do this in TSM. -Original Message- From: Sias Dealy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Retention policy for inactive files Arthur, There is not a parameter that you can set to say all inactive files expire on this date. Here is a work around. You can set up an admin schedule to run on that specific day. You are going to have three admin schedules. 1. The first schedule is to change the verdelet, verexist, retextra, and retonly to 1. 2. Run expire inventory. Keep in mind that expire inventory is very CPU intensive. If there are a lot of files to be expire, the users will notice a drop in performance on the system. 3. The last schedul change the verdelet, verexist, retextra and retonly back to what the values were. Sias Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On, Kleynerman, Arthur ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hello all, I am faced with a situation where I need to delete all inactive files past a certain date, but keep all inactive version prior to that same date. Is there any way that this can be accomplished? I have a TSM server V4.2.3 running on AIX 4.3.3. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Retention policy for inactive files
Hello all, I am faced with a situation where I need to delete all inactive files past a certain date, but keep all inactive version prior to that same date. Is there any way that this can be accomplished? I have a TSM server V4.2.3 running on AIX 4.3.3. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: How long does a UNLOADDB take???
28 GB database, AIX 4.3.3, TSM Server 4.2.1.9: UNLOADDB took about 9 hours, LOADDB took about 3 hours. Database shrunk by 30%. -Original Message- From: Christo Heuer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 4:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How long does a UNLOADDB take??? Hi Niklas, Our OS/390 4.1 Tsm server (38Gig DB), took about two hours to unload but we cancelled the loaddb after about 26 hours. Not too sure why the unload took 2 hours (171 million entries unloaded) - I expected the loaddb to also be in that region. Reverted to restoring the db to the backup we took just before we started the unloaddb process. Decided to give this a miss - silently hoping we'll move to AIX instead. Cheers Christo == Hello We tried to do a unloaddb this weekend to reorganise our database. It ran fine for 2 hours but then it seemed to stop after 157 million entries. ANR4013I UNLOADDB: Dumped 157654872 database entries (cumulative). But after this nothing happens, we could see I/O activity in MVS for the task. After 6 hours we cancelled the job. I've read on the ADSM list about unload times over 20 hours, is this a normal time? q db AvailableAssignedMaximumMaximumPageTotal Used PctMax. Space Capacity ExtensionReductionSize Usable Pages UtilPct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util --- 44,868 44,868 0 6,216 4,096 11,486,208 9,737,492 84.8 84.8 TSM 4.2.0 running on OS/390 MVH Niklas Lundström Föreningssparbanken IT 08-5859 5164 __ The information contained in this communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in reliance of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Absa is neither liable for the proper, complete transmission of the information contained in this communication, any delay in its receipt or that the mail is virus-free. --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: License registration in TSM V4
I tried doing this but then got an error message in the actlog (and no new licenses registered) saying that I have an invalid license file. -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: License registration in TSM V4 Just delete the extras from: /usr/tivioli/tsm/server/bin/nodelock It may require a server cycle. I have never done this before, but seem to remember someone saying do this. I think you can actually delete the file and redo it if you want. -Original Message- From: Kleynerman, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: License registration in TSM V4 Hello all, I accidentally registered more licenses than needed and I would like to know whether there is a way to undo that. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: License registration in TSM V4
Did you have to restart the TSM server in order to do this? -Original Message- From: Jim Sporer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: License registration in TSM V4 I just deleted the nodelock file and then reran all of my register license commands and everything was ok. Jim Sporer At 10:33 AM 1/15/2002 -0500, you wrote: I tried doing this but then got an error message in the actlog (and no new licenses registered) saying that I have an invalid license file. -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: License registration in TSM V4 Just delete the extras from: /usr/tivioli/tsm/server/bin/nodelock It may require a server cycle. I have never done this before, but seem to remember someone saying do this. I think you can actually delete the file and redo it if you want. -Original Message- From: Kleynerman, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: License registration in TSM V4 Hello all, I accidentally registered more licenses than needed and I would like to know whether there is a way to undo that. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message. --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
License registration in TSM V4
Hello all, I accidentally registered more licenses than needed and I would like to know whether there is a way to undo that. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
DB DUMP/ LOAD to DISK
Hello all, I would like to find out whether I can do the DBDUMP/ DBLOAD to disk - the problem is that I would like to do this on a test server which does not have any tape drives or ATL attached to it. Any help/ suggestions are appreciated. Thanks (and Happy Holidays to everyone). Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
EXCLUDE W2K SYSTEM OBJECT
Hello all! Can anyone tell me if there is a way to exclude the SYSTEM OBJECT from being backed up on the W2K servers/ workstations. TSM clients running TSM 4.1. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: EXCLUDE W2K SYSTEM OBJECT
There are a couple of problems with this approach: 1. what if someone has the E, F, etc. drives? 2. what if for some PC's the D drive is a network drive? I definitely don't want to back this up. Is there any other way to do this? -Original Message- From: Kyle Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EXCLUDE W2K SYSTEM OBJECT If you use C: D: instead of ALL-LOCAL you will only get the registry. Then you could add backupregistry no and that should do it. Kyle -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kleynerman, Arthur Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 13:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: EXCLUDE W2K SYSTEM OBJECT Hello all! Can anyone tell me if there is a way to exclude the SYSTEM OBJECT from being backed up on the W2K servers/ workstations. TSM clients running TSM 4.1. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: archives for this list
www.adsm.org -Original Message- From: Chuck Lam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: archives for this list Hello, Would someone kindly show me how to look up archives for this list? TIA __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: TSM 4.2
Andy, why is it that the NT/2000 4.2.0 client's TSM420GA_NT_README.FTP.txt
file says - This package is for Windows 98 or Windows ME running on an
Intel (or similar) processor.
Arthur
-Original Message-
From: Andy Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2
The TSM servers contain the licensing files that enable you to use it. Any
time there is a new version or release of TSM, you need to pay for it. By
new version or release, I mean that the first or second nodes of the verson
number have changed (i.e. 4.2 = Version 4, Release 2). Only TSM server PTFs
and patches are made available on the ftp site, and those presume that you
have already bought the GA level of the code (which has the licensing
parts).
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Tivoli Systems
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend
Tom Tann{s [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 07/02/2001 04:53:57
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: TSM 4.2
Hello!
The 4.2-clients have been available on the ftp-server since Saturday.
Anyone know why the 4.2-servers still are missing?
GA was on July 1. for both?
The AIX-server is the one I'm waiting for..
---
The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is
confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message
in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message,
or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or
e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you.
Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however,
review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take
no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be
transferred via this e-mail message.
==
Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM)README.FTP
WINDOWS Backup-Archive Client
Version 4 Release 2, Level 0.0
Licensed Materials - Property of IBM
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2001. All rights reserved.
Welcome to the Tivoli Storage Manager Version 4.2
WINDOWS Backup-Archive Client!
==
- The installation package is available from the FTP server:
- ftp.software.ibm.com.
- When downloading the files, be sure to download all *.EXE files in BINARY mode.
- Directory:
- /storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v4r2/Windows/winnt/latest
- Files:
- TSM420GA_NT.exe Self extracting executable, Client code.
- TSM420GA_NT_READ1STC.TXT Backup/Archive client readme file.
- TSM420GA_NT_README.FTPThis readme file.
- The following information provides instructions for starting the installation.
Before starting the installation, be sure that you have downloaded the correct
*.EXE files for the desired package. It is also a good idea to review the
READ1STC.TXT file before performing the installation, in order to acquaint
yourself with what is new in this release.
- This package is for Windows 98 or Windows ME running on an Intel
(or similar) processor.
- Installation instructions:
(The BA Client and ODBC executables behave similarly)
1) Extract the installation image by clicking on the desired executable:
- TSM420GA_NT.exe (For BA Client)
or
Change into the directory where you downloaded the installation image
and type the following from the command line:
- TSM420GA_NT (For BA Client)
2) Follow the SETUP program prompts to complete the installation.
NOTE: Installation launches immediately after image extraction, however,
actual installation of the client/odbc code may be cancelled, leaving the
extracted files in the directory specified during the extraction process.
DHCP and TSM
Hello all, Does anyone use TSM and DHCP in the same environment. Are there any issues/ problems with this setup? Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: DHCP and TSM
Thank you for the info!!! -Original Message- From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DHCP and TSM Most of our 400+ desktop machines are DHCP, most back up via the scheduler. We've never had a problem with DHCP and TSM coexisting. We use POLLING mode by default, just as a precaution. TSM never has to remember a client's TCP/IP address that way. Wanda Prather The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab 443-778-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think - Scott Adams/Dilbert -Original Message- From: Kleynerman, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DHCP and TSM Hello all, Does anyone use TSM and DHCP in the same environment. Are there any issues/ problems with this setup? Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: DHCP and TSM
We use PROMPTED mode and I am not sure how the server will contact the clients if the IP address changes. I have tested it by simply changing my machine's IP address and unless I stop and start the services, the backup does not kickoff. -Original Message- From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DHCP and TSM Most of our 400+ desktop machines are DHCP, most back up via the scheduler. We've never had a problem with DHCP and TSM coexisting. We use POLLING mode by default, just as a precaution. TSM never has to remember a client's TCP/IP address that way. Wanda Prather The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab 443-778-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think - Scott Adams/Dilbert -Original Message- From: Kleynerman, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DHCP and TSM Hello all, Does anyone use TSM and DHCP in the same environment. Are there any issues/ problems with this setup? Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Error 6 killing thread (#)
Hello all, Has anyone seen this error and can someone suggest a fix for it? The error appears in the dsmerror.log while the clients' WinNT and W2K workstations (running TSM V4.1) are in the process of shutting down. The error is accompanied by the message (that pops up on the screen) dsmcsvc.exe Application Error, address in memory could not be referenced. This may not be a big problem, but users find these messages very annoying. Thanks in advance, Arthur --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: Exclude not working
Are there any other incl/excl statements defined (in dsm.opt file or client option set on the server)? -Original Message- From: MacMurray, Andrea (CC-ETS Ent Storage Svcs) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exclude not working Hi everybody, Maybe this question has been here more than once, but being relativley new to the list as well as to Tivoli I dare to ask anyway. The following DSM.OPT files runs on a NT service pac6 with TDP for Lotus Notes version 4.6. * * IBM Adstar Distributed Storage Manager * * tpomaha dsm.opt for ADSMConnect Agent for Lotus Notes on * Windows NT using tcp/ip. * nodename tpomaha01_notes commmethod TCPIP tcpport 1500 tcpserveraddress cagadsm3.conagra.cag tcpbuffsize 31 tcpwindowsize24 COMPRESSION NO PASSWORDACCESS Generate VERBOSE yes exclude d:\notes\data\mailobj.nsf My problem is the exclude. It does not exclude the file. Does anybody out there see why??? Thanks for your help Andrea Mac Murray --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: cloptset broken for Windows 4.1.2.X client
Suad, did you specify force=yes (to override the options in the dsm.opt file)? For example: def clientopt opt_set 'Exclude ' seq=0 force=yes Arthur. -Original Message- From: Suad Musovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 11:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cloptset broken for Windows 4.1.2.X client I have upgraded a few Windows (2Kpro) boxes from the 3.7.2 TSM client to the 4.1.2.19 one. The new client seems to ignore the Client-Option set assigned to these clients? In our case, it ignores all the EXCLUDE options and proceeds to backup the entire hard-drive. Anyone aware of this one? Cheers, Suad -- --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: cloptset broken for Windows 4.1.2.X client
What if one has all of inclexcl statements defined in the client option set and none in the dsm.opt file? -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cloptset broken for Windows 4.1.2.X client Suad, did you specify force=yes (to override the options in the dsm.opt file)? Note that INCLEXCL and DOMAIN are additive options such that Force has no effect. That is, Force pertains only to singular options. --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: Another cloptset Question regarding inclexcl
When you define the option for the option set, do the following: def clientopt option_set_name inclexcl 'Exclude "*:\...\Temporary Internet Files\...\"' seq=0 force=yes Arthur. -Original Message- From: Short, Anne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Another cloptset Question regarding inclexcl I've been trying to create exclude statements for our cloptset where the excluded directory path includes a space in the name (i.e., program files, Temporary Internet Files). I've used every combination of single and double quotation marks that I can think of, and even though, from the server's point of view, these statements are valid, when I get on the client and do a "q inclexcl", these things either do not show up at all, or show up incorrectly (only text up to the first space is shown). Anyone else gotten these type of statements to work in a cloptset? I have no trouble when they are in a dsm.opt or dsm.sys file, only from the cloptset. Anne Short Lockheed Martin Enterprise Information Systems Gaithersburg, Maryland 301-240-6184 CODA/I Storage Management --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
TSM Server 3.7.3 running on AIX 4.3.3 with 2 CPUs at 200 MHz and 2 GB of RAM
Hello all, I have a similar question to the one asked earlier... Our TSM server (V3.7.3) is running on AIX 4.3.3. 2 CPU at 200 MHz, 2 GB of RAM We have over 250 GB of data backed up to our server on a daily basis and the CPU is always maxed out, at or near 100%. We are currently considering buying a new, more powerful node, but I was thinking that maybe upgrading the current one is more cost-effective. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!!! Thanks, Arthur. --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
APAR IC29552
Hello all! Does anyone know why the TSM 4.1.2 client for NT is not available for download and what the below message means: (NOTE: The V 4.1.2 backup archive client has been temporarily removed while APAR IC29552 is investigated) We're in the process of distributing version (TSM 4.1.2) to all of our NT clients!!! Thanks! Arthur. --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: HELP: server client option set ignored by clients....why?
You need to change the parameter to OVERRIDE YES - whatever is in the CLO will override anything else in the dsm.opt file on the client (in case there are any incl/excl statements) -Original Message- From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HELP: server "client option set" ignored by clientswhy? Hello, I have a bunch of includes and excludes in a client option set on my v4 TSM server. When the schedule runs, the clients backup the files even if they are excluded in the client option set they are not over-riding the client option set. I am sure the clients have the client option set assigned to them. Any ideas on why this is happening, and how to trouble shoot? Optionset WIN32_INCLEXCL Option INCLEXCL Sequence number 18 Option Value Exclude '*:\...\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\...\*' Override NO --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: 3590E
We also started using the 3590E's and one tape had to be physically removed from the tape drive - the tape snapped and had to be replaced. A few days earlier, someone in the tape library dropped a 3590E cartridge, but I was told that it was not damaged. The tape that got stuck is probably that "undamaged" tape... BTW we pay $60 for every one of those tapes. Arthur. -Original Message- From: Richard L. Rhodes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 5:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3590E We had a E-tape get stuck in a drive. The IBM CE showed up to work on it. After a while he came walking up to our desks holding the cartridge in one hand and yards of mangled tape in his other hand. He showed us a spot on the tape - there was a splice, and a very bad splice at that (ends were not lined up very well). Rick On 14 Feb 2001, at 12:35, Debbie Lane wrote: We recently started using 3590E tapes. Several of them are damaged. We talked to IBM support, and it sounds like other customers have had similar problems. I am wondering if any of you have experienced 3590E damaged in shipment? Have you had other problems with the 3590E? --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
BMR Software
Hello everyone: Has anybody had any experience with the Kernel Group's BMR software? Any thoughts and/or comments would be appreciated. Thanks, Arthur. --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: Error Handling in Macros
type "commit" after each statement: q vol access=destroyed commit q vol access=unavail commit etc. -Original Message- From: Steve Firmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 2:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error Handling in Macros I have been trying to right a macro that contains several queries. The problem I am having is when the query doesn't return a result. example macro: q vol access=destroyed q vol access=unavailable result: ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria. ANS8001I Return code 11. ANS8029E Macro processing terminated. The macro never gets to the second statement. Does anyone know how I can get the macro to proceed beyond the first message? Thanks for your help. Stephen Firmes, Storage Management Specialist Articulent Inc. 45 South Street, Hopkinton, MA 01748 P: 508-497-2500/F: 508-497-3464 Please visit our web site at www.articulent.com --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2
Hi Wayne, I know that this problem didn't exist in V3.7 or V4.1 since both were tested and deployed. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Wayne T. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2 Thanks to Jennifer and Arthur for discussing this TSM Windows client bug. Some postings on ADSM-L last year suggest that the problem may have been around since v3.7 (but I can't verify that, as we skipped v3.7 for a number of reasons). We tailor our installables very much as Cornell does. None of files DSM.OPT, dsm.opt, ba_dsm.opt, BA_DSM.OPT nor dsm.smp in the /program files/Tivoli/TSM/config folder get copied during install of v4.1.2. No dsm.opt or dsm.new is created on install. The v4.1.2 wizards are quite wonderful compared to the 10-foot long DSMCUTIL command we used to have to force on our client operators. This tailored DSM.OPT facility is quite important to us however! Can a Tivoli person or anyone else recommend I open a PMR/APAR on the subject, or is support aware and working on the problem? Can I answer this question with a DB search someplace? Thanks, wayne Wayne T. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] ADSM Technical Coordinator - UNET University of Maine System --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2
We had the same problem. After calling Tivoli, I was told that I was the only one who complained about this. Apparently no one else has. Our workaround was to manually copy the predefined dsm.opt file into the baclient directory during the installation. Arthur. -Original Message- From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 5:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2 I have installed a predefined dsm.opt file, when installing TSM 4.1.2 on Windows 2000 that has not had the client previously installed. Placed dsm.opt in the ..\config directory and ran setup. If you are using W2K Group Policy to install the client (again on a "clean" server), I have found that it does not use the custom dsm.opt file. Ditto if you just run "Tivoli Storage Manager Client.msi". How were you installing the client? Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer I. Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 4:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2 Gentle Greetings, Has anyone yet succeeded in installing a predefined (custom) dsm.opt file with TSM client version 4.1.2? So far all of our attempts have failed... the installer seems to ignore anything I put in the ...\config folder. I have read and tried to follow the instructions in the README that came with 4.1.2, though I have some concern that the path referenced there does not reflect the path to the config folder after extracting the files from the 4.1.2 installer exe. It looks more like the path that was used in previous versions. So I wonder if this process works in this version. Thank you in advance for any help, suggestions, and/or shared experiences. Jennifer --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2
Hi Tim, We built an SMS package for the install. After we realized the the files were not being copied over, we added an extra command to force this step. As I mentioned, I called Tivoli (PMR 19101, 23e) but was told that their testing didn't show any problems with this. AND, I was told that the client files may have been corrupted while I was downloading them. I downloaded the 6 files again, but the problem remained. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2 Hi Arthur: Were you using Group Policy? Did you open a problem with Tivoli? If so is there an APAR on this? I was not sure if Tivoli would treat this as a problem or a design request - I was going to try as a problem but if you already have one open ... Another feature we would like to see is the ability to install the Web Client Service and Schedule Service via Group Policy Software Installation. Then it would be a totally automated installation. Thanks, Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kleynerman, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2 We had the same problem. After calling Tivoli, I was told that I was the only one who complained about this. Apparently no one else has. Our workaround was to manually copy the predefined dsm.opt file into the baclient directory during the installation. Arthur. -Original Message- From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 5:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2 I have installed a predefined dsm.opt file, when installing TSM 4.1.2 on Windows 2000 that has not had the client previously installed. Placed dsm.opt in the ..\config directory and ran setup. If you are using W2K Group Policy to install the client (again on a "clean" server), I have found that it does not use the custom dsm.opt file. Ditto if you just run "Tivoli Storage Manager Client.msi". How were you installing the client? Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: TSM 4.1 on NT
Hi, We had this problem, until we figured out that the secret is not in the windows installer but rather the version of IE you have on your NT client. Make sure you have the most recent version and you will only need to reboot once. Arthur. -Original Message- From: Collins, Brenda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 12:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 4.1 on NT Hi! Most of out NT servers that we are looking to install TSM 4.1 on, do not have the updated windows installer. As a result, it requires an additional re-boot prior to installing TSM. Has anyone been successful in scripting the installation for SMS and getting around any re-boots? If you would be willng to share your ideas, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Brenda Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.
Re: TSM 4.1.2 for Windows NT - ERROR
Yes it is. This seems to suggest that there are duplicate include/exclude statements, but there are none, as far as I can tell. -Original Message- From: Joel Fuhrman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 3:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.2 for Windows NT - ERROR Is a client Optionset defined for this node on the server? On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Kleynerman, Arthur wrote: Hello all: I am seeing the following error in my dsmerror.log: 01/02/2001 18:01:43 ANS1497W Duplicate include/exclude option 'EXCLUDE ?:\...\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\...\*' found while processing the client options passed by the server. This might produce unexpected results. 01/02/2001 18:01:43 ANS1497W Duplicate include/exclude option 'EXCLUDE ?:\...\COOKIES\...\*' found while processing the client options passed by the server. This might produce unexpected results. 01/02/2001 18:01:43 ANS1497W Duplicate include/exclude option 'EXCLUDE ?:\...\RECYCLE*\...\*' found while processing the client options passed by the server. This might produce unexpected results. 01/02/2001 18:01:43 ANS1497W Duplicate include/exclude option 'EXCLUDE ?:\...\*.VIR' found while processing the client options passed by the server. This might produce unexpected results. 01/02/2001 18:01:43 ANS1497W Duplicate include/exclude option 'EXCLUDE ?:\...\CACHE\...\*' found while processing the client options passed by the server. This might produce unexpected results. 01/02/2001 18:01:43 ANS1497W Duplicate include/exclude option 'EXCLUDE ?:\...\*.TMP' found while processing the client options passed by the server. This might produce unexpected results. 01/02/2001 18:01:43 ANS1497W Duplicate include/exclude option 'EXCLUDE ?:\...\*.MP3' found while processing the client options passed by the server. This might produce unexpected results. This is the output from "Q INCLEXL" on the client: tsm q inclexcl Node Name: ARTHUR.KLEYNERMAN Session established with server TSM_SERVER_01: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 3, Release 7, Level 3.0 Server date/time: 01/03/2001 10:37:35 Last access: 01/03/2001 10:35:52 *** FILE INCLUDE/EXCLUDE *** Mode Function Pattern (match from top down) Source File - -- - No exclude directory statements defined. Excl All #\...\*.MP3Server Excl All #\...\*.TMPServer Excl All #\...\CACHE\...\* Server Excl All #\...\*.VIRServer Excl All #\...\RECYCLE*\...\* Server Excl All #\...\COOKIES\...\*Server Excl All #\...\TEMPORARY*FILES\...\*Server Excl All #\IBMDOS.COM dsm.opt Excl All #\IBMBIO.COM dsm.opt Excl All #\...\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\...\*dsm.opt Excl All #\...\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\*.* dsm.opt Excl All #\...\*.PARdsm.opt Excl All #\...\PAGEFILE.SYS dsm.opt Excl All #\...\386SPART.PAR dsm.opt Excl All #\...\WIN386.SWP dsm.opt Excl All #\...\*.SWPdsm.opt Excl All #\...\EA DATA. SF dsm.opt Excl All #\MICROSOFT UAM VOLUME\...\*.* dsm.opt Excl All #\MICROSOFT UAM VOLUME\...\* dsm.opt Excl All #\MICROSOFT UAM VOLUME\*.* dsm.opt Excl All #\MICROSOFT UAM VOLUME\* dsm.opt Excl All #\MACINTOSH VOLUME\...\*.* dsm.opt Excl All #\MACINTOSH VOLUME\...\* dsm.opt Excl All #\MACINTOSH VOLUME\*.* dsm.opt Excl All #\MACINTOSH VOLUME\* dsm.opt No encryption include/exclude statements defined. Thanks! Arthur. --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message. --- The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permissio
ANS1086E File not found during Backup, Archive or Migrate process ing
Hello all, I am getting this error message: 12/11/2000 04:27:42 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\sms1nt\d$\SMS\inboxes\schedule.box\outboxes\LAN\2_ZFIM01.SRS' failed 12/11/2000 04:27:42 ANS1086E File not found during Backup, Archive or Migrate processing even though, I specifically exclude this directory in the dsm.opt file (on TSM V4.1 NT 4.0 client) Exclude "*:\SMS\inboxes\...\*" Include "*:\SMS\inboxes\sitectrl.box\*" Any ideas why? Thanks! Arthur.
Re: Archiving and database growth
Terry, I've had similar experience trying the "export node" command - only 1 node can be exported to a single tape. Arthur. -Original Message- From: Barth, Terry (MBS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 7:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Archiving and database growth Hello fellow *SMrs: I am beginning to implement the archiving feature, as the backupset just wastes too much tape, as from what I have tested, only 1 node goes to 1 tape. If I am wrong, please tell me Anyway, we have the need to store files for legal reasons for a large amount of time - ex: 5 years, 7 years, etc. - Therefore, my only solution as to not waste so many tapes, because I have 250 + servers that I am dealing with, I was going to implement archiving. Therefore, I was wondering if anyone knows the impact that archiving has on the size of the database? I am concerned about the archiving feature growing my database tremendously. Thanks Terry
TSM Server 3.7.3 running on AIX 4.3.3
Hello all, Our TSM 3.7.3 server is currently running on AIX 4.3.2.0 A couple of questions: 1. Does anyone know of any issues/problems with running a TSM server 3.7.3 on AIX version 4.3.3? 2. Is there a limit to the number of processors that a TSM 3.7.3 (or TSM V4) server can utilize running on AIX 4.3.3? I had heard that the limit is 2. Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks, Arthur Kleynerman NYC
Re: Missed backups on Windows NT
you need to check the permissions on the E_Drive... -Original Message- From: Thomas Denier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Missed backups on Windows NT We have a Windows NT client with C, D, and E drives. The central scheduler requests an incremental backup every night. The schedule has a null object list. We recently discovered that the E disk had not been backed up in several months. The system administrator and I logged in an attempt to discover the reason for this. There was nothing in the options file calling for backups to skip the E drive. There were no messages in the log files indicating that ADSM had been trying to backup the E drive and suffered errors. The GUI client listed all three drives and had no apparent difficulty backing up the E drive. The administrator did notice one oddity. The E drive no longer had the default share normally defined for drives on Windows NT systems. He was sure that the drive had once had such a default share, but could set only broad limits on the time at which the default share was removed (the person who probably removed the default share no longer works here). The date at which backups of the E drive stopped falls within these limits. Does the command line client need the default share to recognize drives as candidates for backup? The client OS level is 4.0. The ADSM client level is 3.1.0.6.
ANR0540W - Data Integrity Error
Hello everyone, I am getting the following error on our TSM (version 3) server, when an NT client tries a restore: 08/01/2000 10:49:35 ANRD smnqr.c(1265): Bitfile 198748526 not found for retrieval. 08/01/2000 10:49:35 ANR0540W Retrieve or restore failed for session 38941 for node SUTTONM (WinNT) - data integrity error detected. Has anyone else seen an error like this one and does anyone know what needs to be done to fix this? I was thinking of running the "dsmserv auditdb" command, but I do not know how long this might take (we have a 32 GB database that is about 75% utilized). Any thoughts/comments would be appreciated!!! Thanks in advance, Arthur Kleynerman.
