Re: DB2 configuration and backup
Here is what your errors mean: 610 E DSM_RC_NLS_CANT_OPEN_TXT Explanation: The system is unable to open the message txt file (dscameng.txt or dsmclientV3.cat for AIX). On the AS/400 platform this file is QANSAPI/QAANSAMENG(TXT). System Action: The system returns to the calling procedure. User Response: Verify that the dscameng.txt file is in the directory pointed to by DSMI_DIR. For AIX, verify that the dsmclientV3.cat file has a symbolic link to /usr/lib/nls/msg/locale/dsmclientV3.cat . 2025 E DSM_RC_INVALID_MCNAME Explanation: A query or send operation is unable to find the management class name. System Action: The system returns to the calling procedure. User Response: Verify the management class name Ted W. Qualls UNIX Enterprise Engineering PepsiCo Business Solutions Group 5080 Spectrum Drive Suite 600W Addison, TX 75001 office: 972.376.7809 pgr:800.946.4645 pin 1090913 cell: 469.682.1773 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Nettie Kinison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DB2 configuration and backup We are trying to setup the DB2 backups using TSM. Our TSM server is 5.1 and we have installed the 4.3 api client on an AIX server. I'm getting the following error. [dbadm@server/home/dbadm]db2 backup db testdb online use tsm SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media /home/dbadm/sqllib/adsm/libadsm.a. Reason code: 610. I've triple checked the installation and config files and sometimes get Reason code 1 or Reason code 2025. But still get the same error. I've re-created the client nodename and password also. Any help would be appreciated. We are awaiting a call from Tivoli support. Thanks, Nettie Kinison
Re: 64-Bit Filesystem
look through the docs on tivoli.com/support I believe that TSM client supports 64 bit on the AIX platform (TSM client 5.1.0 and 5.1.5). Ted W. Qualls UNIX Enterprise Engineering PepsiCo Business Solutions Group 5080 Spectrum Drive Suite 600W Addison, TX 75001 office: 972.376.7809 pgr:800.946.4645 pin 1090913 cell: 469.682.1773 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrews, Bert A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 64-Bit Filesystem yes contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 64-Bit Filesystem On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:40:23 +0100 Sascha Braeuning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello TSMers, does anyone know, if TSM Client supports backing up a 64-Bit Filesystem. Where can I find some hints in the docs? I don't know what you think qualifies as 64bit, but at least jfs2 is supported. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams
Re: Help Urgently needed
you might try reloading your client code. Ted W. Qualls UNIX Enterprise Engineering PepsiCo Business Solutions Group 5080 Spectrum Drive Suite 600W Addison, TX 75001 office: 972.376.7809 pgr:800.946.4645 pin 1090913 cell: 469.682.1773 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Joshua Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Help Urgently needed That doesn't look good. I would recommend calling support at this point. -- Joshua S. Bassi IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP AIX, HACMP, Storage, TSM Consultant Cell (831) 595-3962 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Amini, Mehdi Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help Urgently needed When I try to create a scheduler service on a NT4 running TSM Version 4.2.31 I get this error: The procedure Entry Point TSMEnumDependentServiceEnd Could not be located in the Dynamic Link Library TMSUTIL1.DLL Please help Thanks Mehdi Amini LAN/WAN Engineer ValueOptions 12369 Sunrise Valley Drive Suite C Reston, VA 20191 Phone: 703-390-6855 Fax: 703-390-2581 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by email, delete and destroy this message and its attachments. **
Re: TSM DB defect? ANR9999D pkthread.c(791): ThreadId50 Run-tim e assertion
We received the same error running 4.2.1.11 server code for AIX. TSM 3rd level support told us to go to 4.2.2 server code and it should fix these errors. BUT you have to run an 'auditdb' to rid the database of the orphaned entries that are generating all of errors. Of course, depending on your database size, an auditdb could take up to several days! -Original Message- From: Norbert Martin NKM-Solutions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM DB defect? ANRD pkthread.c(791): ThreadId50 Run-time assertion Hi, I have been working with TSM Server 4.2.2.1 on Windows 2000 and TSM client. But I don't know, what on hell, this message say. Is the DB defect? After this event, the tsm Server stoped. Can anybody the say where is the defect? regards Norbert 05/28/2002 14:42:27 ANR4391I Expiration processing node DEGHV0M2KS25, filespace \\deghv0m2ks25\c$, fsId 1, domain W2KDOM, and management class DEFAULT - for BACKUP type files. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 ANRD pkthread.c(791): ThreadId50 Run-time assertion failed: tmCmpTsn( tmGetTsn( txnP-tid ), tmGetTsn( tid ) ) == EQUAL, Thread 50, File dbtxn.c, Line 308. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Context report 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Thread ImDoExpiration (38) is a parent thread related to: 50 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Generating TM Context Report: (struct=tmTxnDesc) (slots=256) 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) slot - 176: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Tsn=0:10578352, Resurrected=False, InFlight=True, Distributed=False 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Participants=2, summaryVote=ReadOnly 05/28/2002 14:42:28 Participant DB: voteReceived=False, ackReceived=False 05/28/2002 14:42:28 Participant IM: voteReceived=False, ackReceived=False 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) slot - 234: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Tsn=0:10578154, Resurrected=False, InFlight=True, Distributed=False 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Participants=1, summaryVote=ReadOnly 05/28/2002 14:42:28 Participant DB: voteReceived=False, ackReceived=False 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Generating Database Transaction Table Context: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) *** no transactions found *** 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Generating SM Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) *** no sessions found *** 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Generating AS Vol Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) No mounted (or mount in progress) volumes. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Generating ssSession Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) No storage service sessions active. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Generating ssOpenSeg Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) No storage service segments found. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) Generating BF Copy Control Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (38) No global copy control blocks. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) DelGrpFilesThread : ANRD calling thread 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Generating TM Context Report: (struct=tmTxnDesc) (slots=256) 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) slot - 179: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Tsn=0:10578355, Resurrected=False, InFlight=True, Distributed=False 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Participants=1, summaryVote=ReadOnly 05/28/2002 14:42:28 Participant DB: voteReceived=False, ackReceived=False 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Generating Database Transaction Table Context: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) *** no transactions found *** 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Generating SM Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) *** no sessions found *** 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Generating AS Vol Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) No mounted (or mount in progress) volumes. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Generating ssSession Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) No storage service sessions active. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Generating ssOpenSeg Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) No storage service segments found. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) Generating BF Copy Control Context Report: 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) No global copy control blocks. 05/28/2002 14:42:28 05/28/2002 14:42:28 (50) End Context report 05/28/2002 14:43:24 ANR1423W Scratch volume 436AACL1 is empty but will not be deleted - volume access mode is offsite. 05/28/2002 14:43:24 ANR1423W Scratch volume 431AACL1 is empty but will not be deleted - volume access mode is offsite. 05/28/2002 14:43:24 ANR1423W Scratch volume 458AACL1 is empty but will not be deleted - volume access mode is offsite. 05/28/2002 14:43:24 ANR2803I License manager started.
Re: labeling 3590 volumes
have you tried a 'move data' against the volumes? -Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: labeling 3590 volumes Already tried that, it fails with ANR8816E - volume is already defined to the library. I need some way to bypass the checkin step of the label process.. -Original Message- From: Pearson, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: labeling 3590 volumes I did a Help Label in TSM and if I'm thinking what you want... here it is labe libv library_name volume_name overwrite=yes Dave Pearson Comptuer Nework Service Snohomish County PUD # 1 -Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: labeling 3590 volumes Is there anyway to overwrite the header/label of a 3590 tape? One of our ATLs had a problem with some 3590 drives and chewed up the header records. The assumption is that the tape is good, the header records are just bad. I would restore the volumes from the copypools, but it just so happened that the two volumes that got whacked were a primary and the copy of the primary -- Anyway, I'm hoping there is a way to get TSM to overwrite the header records without destroying the data. If there isn't, we are going to try using dd to recreate the headers. Anybody ever done that successfully?
Re: Downlevel client code version
can you rename the node and filespace to something different in TSM? then I would try to run a small backup. might work..? -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Downlevel client code version Call support. I have heard they have some commands to fix this kind of thing. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon, INC 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Henrry Aranda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Downlevel client code version A have a problem: A WinNT client node (v.4.1.20) accessed the TSM server (v.4.2.1.15) using the nodename of a Netware client. Now the Netware client (v.4.1.0) can't access the server anymore. The message ANS1357S Session rejected: Downlevel client code version is displayed. The Platform in a q node changed from NetWare to WinNT. I upgraded the novell client to 4.2.1.29(greater than the WinNT client), but i receive the same message. A similar problem is described in IC32139, Does anybody know how i can resolve that? I need to restore data from my netware client. Henrry Aranda Gonzales _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
unregister licenses?
Hello! Does anyone know how to unregister licenses without recycling the TSM server? thanks.
un-register licenses?
Hello! Does anyone know if there is a way to un-register licenses to TSM without recycling the server and/or deleting the nodelock file (which requires registering ALL of the licenses again...I think)? I ran into the known apar where the 'register lic' command seemingly doesn't register licenses (tried to verify by 'q license'). So, after running it twice, I decided to look at the nodelock file and viola! there was 2X the number of licenses that I wanted to register. The 'q license' output still says that the licenses haven't been updated, and we are getting thousands of the 'out of compliance' messages in our actlog. We are running TSM server code 4.2.2 for AIX. Thanks in advance. Ted W. Qualls PepsiCo Business Solutions Group Systems Engineer - UNIX Engineering 5080 Spectrum Drive Suite 600W Addison, TX 75001 office972.376.7809 pager972.297.6973 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mtlib command
try this little ksh script:
tape_drives=$(lsdev -Cc tape | grep rmt | awk '{ print $1 }')
for i in $tape_drives
do
printf $i:
lscfg -vl $i | grep Serial Number
done
-Original Message-
From: Alfred G Welch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mtlib command
Geoff,
The command I use to get the serial numbers for my drives:
lscfg -l rmt* -v
I
Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 05/20/2002
10:45:57 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:mtlib command
Good day all,
Somewhere I had documented an mtlib command that could be used to query
information about the drives attached to the system. With the changeover of
TSM servers it's hard to figure out what drive is what. I have identified a
few by looking in the side door of the 3494 when a tape got mounted.
Unfortunately I'll never be able to do this with the rest and have
misplaced
my mtlib commands.
Can anyone send me the command gives info about the drive itself, as in
serial number, so I can match rmt(whatever) to it. All I can find is mtlib
-l /dev/lmcp0 -qD -f/dev/rmt6, and this one doesn't do it for me. I've got
a
bad drive and need to locate it this way.
Thanks,
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (858) 826-4062
Pager: (877) 905-7154
Re: Question about tape drive utilization and the summary file
Have you tried taking drives 0,1 and 3 offline to see if drive 2 gets a mount? -Original Message- From: David Jelinek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question about tape drive utilization and the summary file Is the summary file supposed to list all tape mounts for drives online to TSM? I thought that I would use the summary log to determine tape utilization. When I pulled the data, I discovered that we have been using drives 0,1, and 3 but not using drive 2 (not a single mount in a month and a half according to the summary table). And yes, the drive has been online to TSM the whole time with no errors reported that I can find. Am I missing something obvious? We have a 3494 library with 3590 drives. Thanks in advance. -- David Jelinek Systems Programmer Central Michigan University
Re: move data
I believe that to be correct. -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: move data I can't actually try this since I have processes running so I thought I'd see if I can get an answer while I'm waiting for access to drives. I have a tape pool with 2 filling tapes and many full tapes. Can I update the 2 filling tapes to read only and expect that move data will move data from filling and full tapes to scratch tapes? What I'm trying to do is move data off the J tapes to K scratch tapes. Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
Re: TDP for Exchange
The first incremental backup taken is essentially a full backup. -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TDP for Exchange Hi *SM-ers! I can't find an answer in the manual for a question from one of my users: What happens when I start an incremental backup for a new TDP for Exchange server? So, what happens when I start an incremental when no full backup exists? Thanks in advance for the answer! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: W2K backup error message
Have you looked through the include/exclude statements for errors? -Original Message- From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W2K backup error message I don't recall ever seeing/getting a response to this issue. I am receiving the following error messages from a W2K server backup 03/18/2002 19:17:42 ANE4042E (Session: 1014, Node: ACADNT5) Object name '\\' contains one or more unrecognized characters and is not valid. They are running the 4.2.1.0 client. I told them to upgrade to 4.2.1.20 (or should I go higher ???) client, but want to be sure this will address the issue ! Is this a UNICODE issue ? Our server is OS390 4.1.4. I was about to install the 4.1.5 patches and say they are up to 4.1.8, so I am going there, instead. Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University - University Computing Center e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - voice: 804-828-4807
