Re: SIGNOFF
ADSM-L Shekhar Dhotre/US1/Lend Lease 04/15/2004 11:09 AM To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject SIGNOFF ADSM-L in the body of the e-mail. "SIGNOFF ADSM-L" Shekhar Dhotre/US1/Lend Lease 04/15/2004 10:28 AM To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe I have sent this message three times unsuccessfully, have you had any luck? NO I WANT REALLY TO UNSUBSCRIBE, AND I CAN'T What shell I do ? I have all the instructions to do so : To join, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] stating SUBSCRIBE ADSM-L yourfirstname yourlastname in the body of the e-mail. Further instructions will be sent to you. To leave the list at any time, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] stating SIGNOFF ADSM-L in the body of the e-mail. To send a message to all the people currently subscribed to the list, just send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is called "sending mail to the list," because you send mail to a single address and LISTSERV makes copies for all the people who have subscribed. This address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is also called the "list address." You must never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed to all the people who have subscribed. All commands must be sent to the "LISTSERV address," [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or [EMAIL PROTECTED]). It is very important to understand the difference between the two, but fortunately it is not complicated. The LISTSERV address is like a FAX number that connects you to a machine, whereas the list address is like a normal voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the FAX number when you wanted to talk to someone on the phone, you will quickly realize that you used the wrong number and call again. No harm will have been done. If on the other hand you accidentally make your FAX call someone's voice line, the person receiving the call will be inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The fact that most people will eventually connect the FAX machine to the voice line to allow the FAX to go through and make the calls stop does not mean that you should continue to send FAXes to the voice number. People would just get mad at you. It works pretty much the same way with -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christoph Pilgram Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: AW: Upgrade Library 3494 Hi, One more question : does the "audit library" load every tape or does it scan the barcodes of the tapes or does it only look into the database of the library manager ? Thanks for help Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rainer Tammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. April 2004 15:55 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: Upgrade Library 3494 Hello, Christoph Pilgram wrote: >Question : Does the "audit library" not write the category from >library-manager to TSM ? > Can you explain why you had to define an additional tape library >? > >Thanks >Chris > > No, TSM writes the correct categories to the library manager. We had to do this because our library manager destroyed the database during an "teach library"... Bye Rainer >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. April 2004 14:40 >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Betreff: Re: Upgrade Library 3494 > > >We just went through this as part of our 3590-3592 Tape migration in a 3494 >library. Remember that the TSM Library Definition is where the Pri/Scratch >Cat comes from. So as long as you do not change the value you should be >fine. >Once the CE is done you need to do an Audit lib. > >In or situation we had to define an additional (Logical) Tape Library >definition with new categories and then checkout all 3590 tapes with the >"Remove=No" parameter in the checkout libvol cmd then check them back in to >the new lib definition so our new 3592 tapes can use the original lib def >and categories so our scripts didn't blow. > >Hope that info helps. > >-Original Message- >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >Richard Sims >Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:24 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Upgrade Library 3494 > > > > >>We are running TSM (AIX 5.1 / TSM 5.1) with a 3494 Library with about 2000 >>tapes inside (most of them private). Because we have new drives in our >>library (3592) we have to upgrade the library manager software (incl. New >>Library-Manager-PC inside the Library). Our support wants to take the old >> >
SIGNOFF
"SIGNOFF ADSM-L" Shekhar Dhotre/US1/Lend Lease 04/15/2004 10:28 AM To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe Unsubscribe I have sent this message three times unsuccessfully, have you had any luck? NO I WANT REALLY TO UNSUBSCRIBE, AND I CAN'T What shell I do ? I have all the instructions to do so : To join, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] stating SUBSCRIBE ADSM-L yourfirstname yourlastname in the body of the e-mail. Further instructions will be sent to you. To leave the list at any time, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] stating SIGNOFF ADSM-L in the body of the e-mail. To send a message to all the people currently subscribed to the list, just send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is called "sending mail to the list," because you send mail to a single address and LISTSERV makes copies for all the people who have subscribed. This address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is also called the "list address." You must never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed to all the people who have subscribed. All commands must be sent to the "LISTSERV address," [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or [EMAIL PROTECTED]). It is very important to understand the difference between the two, but fortunately it is not complicated. The LISTSERV address is like a FAX number that connects you to a machine, whereas the list address is like a normal voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the FAX number when you wanted to talk to someone on the phone, you will quickly realize that you used the wrong number and call again. No harm will have been done. If on the other hand you accidentally make your FAX call someone's voice line, the person receiving the call will be inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The fact that most people will eventually connect the FAX machine to the voice line to allow the FAX to go through and make the calls stop does not mean that you should continue to send FAXes to the voice number. People would just get mad at you. It works pretty much the same way with -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christoph Pilgram Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: AW: Upgrade Library 3494 Hi, One more question : does the "audit library" load every tape or does it scan the barcodes of the tapes or does it only look into the database of the library manager ? Thanks for help Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rainer Tammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. April 2004 15:55 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: Upgrade Library 3494 Hello, Christoph Pilgram wrote: >Question : Does the "audit library" not write the category from >library-manager to TSM ? > Can you explain why you had to define an additional tape library >? > >Thanks >Chris > > No, TSM writes the correct categories to the library manager. We had to do this because our library manager destroyed the database during an "teach library"... Bye Rainer >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. April 2004 14:40 >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Betreff: Re: Upgrade Library 3494 > > >We just went through this as part of our 3590-3592 Tape migration in a 3494 >library. Remember that the TSM Library Definition is where the Pri/Scratch >Cat comes from. So as long as you do not change the value you should be >fine. >Once the CE is done you need to do an Audit lib. > >In or situation we had to define an additional (Logical) Tape Library >definition with new categories and then checkout all 3590 tapes with the >"Remove=No" parameter in the checkout libvol cmd then check them back in to >the new lib definition so our new 3592 tapes can use the original lib def >and categories so our scripts didn't blow. > >Hope that info helps. > >-Original Message- >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >Richard Sims >Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:24 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Upgrade Library 3494 > > > > >>We are running TSM (AIX 5.1 / TSM 5.1) with a 3494 Library with about 2000 >>tapes inside (most of them private). Because we have new drives in our >>library (3592) we have to upgrade the library manager software (incl. New >>Library-Manager-PC inside the Library). Our support wants to take the old >> >> >PC > > >>out of the Library, the new one with the new Library-Manager-Software into >>the library and make just a reinventory of the lib
ANS1353E Session rejected: Unknown or incorrect ID entered
Hi all, I am getting following error on one of the REdhat Advanced server2.1 when trying to use tsm client(new installation). I have uninstalled and reinstalled tsm client, removed and re-added in tsm server tried to register using open registration without any luck.Other Linux Advanced servers are running tsm clients without any problems - all are on same client code level. Am I missing something here ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# dsmc Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. tsm> i Node Name: USATL01LW206.ERE.COM Please enter your user id : usatl01lw206 ANS1353E Session rejected: Unknown or incorrect ID entered Please enter your user id : usatl01lw206 ANS1353E Session rejected: Unknown or incorrect ID entered tsm> quit [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# uname -a Linux usatl01lw206.ere.com 2.4.9-e.3smp #1 SMP Fri May 3 16:48:54 EDT 2002 i686 unknown [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep -i tiv TIVguid-1.1.0-0 TIVsm-BA-5.1.5-0 TIVsm-API-5.1.5-0
Re: STK L700 upgrade from 6 to 8 tape drives
See if sun detects newly added drives by typingprobe-scsi-all command at OK prompt . reboot -r at OK prompt . then go to /dev/rmt and check if all drives are there . SD Steve Taylor - Sympatico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/17/2003 07:16 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: STK L700 upgrade from 6 to 8 tape drives It has been a while, but you probably need to modifiy /kernel/drv/st.conf, to make sure the defintions for the addl drive targets are defined... the reboot -- -r -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sjerps, Marco Sent: March 17, 2003 4:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: STK L700 upgrade from 6 to 8 tape drives Tom, have you tried a reboot with -r (reconfigure and rediscover)on the solaris ... It should come up with the two extra drives .. Cmdline;> reboot -- -r Have also verified the scsi id's it seems to have some duplicates .. Which is nevert good with scsi. Regards Marco Sjerps -Original Message- From: Tom Molloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 14 maart 2003 16:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: STK L700 upgrade from 6 to 8 tape drives We just upgraded our STK L700 library from 6 DLT8000 drives to 8 DLT8000 drives. When reinstalling the TSM Solaris device drivers it only recognizes 6 of the 8 tape drives. It recognizes 1 of the new ones and drops one of the preexisting ones. We verified that the tape drives where working from the OS. Each sbus card controls 2 drives and has the target id's set to 1 and 0 on each card. Anyone else had this problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Environment: TSM Server 5.1.5.1 - Sun Ultra Enterprise 4500, 4 GB RAM, OS: Solaris 2.7, Library: Storage Tek L700, 8 - DLT8000 drives SCSI attached. Thank You in advance. Tom Molloy Textron Financial Corporation Information Systems Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binding backups to different management classes
I am testing the NODENAME option in the dsm.sys file of the TDP client to specify a different nodename. By specifying different nodename in dsm.sys ,I will have separate nodenames for the baclient and the TDP client. and can use different domain I will let you know . Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/17/2003 03:34 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: binding backups to different management classes It is always highly recommended to use separate nodes for B/A client (files) and TDP (application). TSM licenses are processor-based (v5.1) or system-size (v4.2 and below) and do not depend on number of nodes over the system. For TDPO (RMAN) I would highly recommend to look at TDP for Oracle manual (you can see there a separate option file is used, not one used by B/A client). Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant shekhar Dhotre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17.03.2003 04:21 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: binding backups to different management classes Zlatko, We have Oracle DB and other Data on same node (APT75) . We are backing up all file systems (excluding Oracle DB) using DAILYMGMT management class. I am in process ofTDP/RMAN configuration for Oracle DB backups. Configuration requires Retain Extra Versions=0 And Retain Only Version=0, so I created new management class (TDPMGMT) with Retain extra Versions=0 and Retain Only Version=0 as I cannot change these values in DAILYMGMT class. DAILYMGMT class is used for Daily backups values for Retain Extra Versions=180 and Retain Only Version=180. How TDPMGMT class can be used for TDP/RMAN configuration? Is there any other way to accomplish this? Thanks SD Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/16/2003 07:43 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: binding backups to different management classes You are not binding a whole node. You can bind a set of files to a class, another set to different class, etc. If bindings are not defined through include options (dsm.sys for UNIX, dsm.opt from Windows, cloptset for both) it is equivalent to binding of everything to the default class. Only one class can be default in a policy domain and node can belong to only one domain at any particular moment (later another class can become default or node can be moved to another domain). Thus you have two options: - bind everything to a particular class -- for UNIX - "include /.../* " -- for Windows - "include ?:\...\* " - move the node to a domain in which the class is default - "upd no dom=" Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant shekhar Dhotre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17.03.2003 01:51 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: binding backups to different management classes let me correct my question : How I can bind a node with different management class . ...
Re: binding backups to different management classes
Zlatko, We have Oracle DB and other Data on same node (APT75) . We are backing up all file systems (excluding Oracle DB) using DAILYMGMT management class. I am in process ofTDP/RMAN configuration for Oracle DB backups. Configuration requires Retain Extra Versions=0 And Retain Only Version=0, so I created new management class (TDPMGMT) with Retain extra Versions=0 and Retain Only Version=0 as I cannot change these values in DAILYMGMT class. DAILYMGMT class is used for Daily backups values for Retain Extra Versions=180 and Retain Only Version=180. How TDPMGMT class can be used for TDP/RMAN configuration? Is there any other way to accomplish this? Thanks SD Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/16/2003 07:43 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: binding backups to different management classes You are not binding a whole node. You can bind a set of files to a class, another set to different class, etc. If bindings are not defined through include options (dsm.sys for UNIX, dsm.opt from Windows, cloptset for both) it is equivalent to binding of everything to the default class. Only one class can be default in a policy domain and node can belong to only one domain at any particular moment (later another class can become default or node can be moved to another domain). Thus you have two options: - bind everything to a particular class -- for UNIX - "include /.../* " -- for Windows - "include ?:\...\* " - move the node to a domain in which the class is default - "upd no dom=" Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant shekhar Dhotre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17.03.2003 01:51 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: binding backups to different management classes let me correct my question : How I can bind a node with different management class . ...
Re: binding backups to different management classes
let me correct my question : How I can bind a node with different management class . Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/16/2003 02:43 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: binding backups to different management classes Actually either paths have to be specified with backslashes or the includes have to be made in dsm.sys. - on UNIX forward slashes are used but includes reside in dsm.sys - on Windows includes reside in dsm.opt but backslashes are to be used (even if it often works with forward ones) Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16.03.2003 20:37 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: binding backups to different management classes The simplest way if I understand question is this. In dsm.opt for instance put these lines: include /data1/*.db 7day_class include /data2/*.db 14day_class You could get quite detailed with this, try to keep it as simple as possible though. David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/16/03 12:35 PM >>> Hi All, Is there anyway so that I can bind backup data to different management classes ? Thanks SD. "MMS " made the following annotations on 03/16/2003 01:39:12 PM -- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ==
binding backups to different management classes
Hi All, Is there anyway so that I can bind backup data to different management classes ? Thanks SD.
Re: tdpoconf error --- ANS0236E (RC2032)
e '1998-11-10:17:00:00'; 28> # set until time '2000-03-10:17:00:00'; 29> 30> # 31> # Restore all datafiles in the database not including the controlfile 32> # 33> # restore 34> # (database); 35> restore database; 36> # 37> # Recovers all datafiles in the database 38> # 39> recover database; 40> 41> # Open database after recovery 42> # If controlfile was restored the a reselogs is necessary 43> # sql 'alter database open; 44> # sql 'alter database open resetlogs'; 45> 46> 47> # 48> # Releases all of the disk channels 49> # 50> # release channel d1; 51> # release channel d2; 52> # release channel d3; 53> 54> # Release tape channels 55> release channel t1; 56> 57> } 58> allocated channel: t1 channel t1: sid=12 devtype=SBT_TAPE channel t1: Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle: version 2.2.1.0 Starting restore at 2003-03-11:16:36:58 channel t1: starting datafile backupset restore channel t1: specifying datafile(s) to restore from backup set restoring datafile 1 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/system01.dbf restoring datafile 2 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/undotbs01.dbf restoring datafile 3 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/cwmlite01.dbf restoring datafile 4 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/drsys01.dbf restoring datafile 5 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/example01.dbf restoring datafile 6 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/indx01.dbf restoring datafile 7 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/odm01.dbf restoring datafile 8 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/tools01.dbf restoring datafile 9 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/users01.dbf restoring datafile 00010 to /d12/oradata/rmantst/xdb01.dbf media recovery complete Finished recover at 2003-03-11:16:39:06 released channel: t1 Recovery Manager complete. Thank You Shekhar Dhotre. Sr.Midrange Engineer. Lend Lase , GSDC. PH: 1+404-846-7483 Neil Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/12/2003 10:10 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: tdpoconf error--- ANS0236E (RC2032) I did not paste all of the original information because it gets a bit cumbersome to read. But if you go back and look at some key things in the 'tdpoconf showenv' dump you will notice that you are specifying an options file that exists in .../oracle/bin64 directory but you are using a 32bit AIX TDP Oracle client, did you mean to do this? It is not mandatory, but I would highly recommend keeping 32bit configuration files in the 32bit client directory until you can work through these problems. What server stanza are you using in /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/dsm.opt? If you prefer we can take this off line too. Also, on another note: do not worry about what client code versions you see in the TDP Oracle trace, that has nothing to do with the BA Client you have on your machine. -- Date:Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:14:51 -0500 From:shekhar Dhotre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: tdpoconf error--- ANS0236E (RC2032) Hi All , I have double checked dsm.sys file and other opt file ,no ASSWORDACCESS=generate .. Still I get the following error. has anyone seen this error before ?? tdpoconf password -tdpo_optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt Regards, Neil Rasmussen Software Development TDP for Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tdpoconf error --- ANS0236E (RC2032)
This is output of trace file : I have client 5 1 lvel 5.0 ,but in trace file it shows Client Code Version: 4.2.1.25 .. f5n75 /tmp>dsmc Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. tsm> f5n75 /tmp>more /tsg/tsm/tdpo.trace TSM trace 37601 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0061 [033596] [1] : ../../common/ut/trace.cpp(2498): Tracing is active to file '/tsg/tsm/tdpo.trace'. 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0062 [033596] [1] : ../../common/ut/trace.cpp(2499): Tracefi le maximum length set to 9k bytes. 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0062 [033596] [1] : ../../common/ut/trace.cpp(2508): --- - 03/11/2003 14:42:15 - Trace begun. 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0062 [033596] [1] : ../../common/ut/trace.cpp(2515): Tivoli Storage Manager Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.25 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0062 [033596] [1] : tdpoconf.cpp( 427): === Tracing started for: --- Application Client: TDP Oracle AIX 32bit TDP Version: 2.2.1.0 Compile Time API Header: 4.2.1.0 Run Time API Header: 5.1.5.0 Client Code Version: 4.2.1.25 === 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0062 [033596] [1] : tdpoconf.cpp( 469): DSMI_DIR : /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin DSMI_LOG : /tsg/tsm/tdpo.log DSMI_ORC_DIR : /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin DSMI_ORC_CONFIG: /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/dsm.opt TDPO_AVG_SIZE : 50 TDPO_FS: /rcattst TDPO_NODE : f5n75 TDPO_OWNER : oracle TDPO_PSWDPATH : /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle TDPO_TRACE_MAX : 1 TDPO_TRACE_FILE: /tsg/tsm/tdpo.trace TDPO_TRACE_FLAGS :orclevel0 orclevel1 orclevel2 TDPO_MGMT_CLASS_2 : TDPO_MGMT_CLASS_3 : TDPO_MGMT_CLASS_4 : TDPO_NUM_BUFFERS : 1 TDPO_DATE_FORMAT : 1 TDPO_TIME_FORMAT : 1 TDPO_NUM_FORMAT: 1 TDPO_LANGUAGE : 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0062 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 161): pstdpoPassW ord(): Enter 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0063 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 331): getPwInput( ): Enter 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0063 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 460): ReadPass(): Enter 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0063 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 561): install_sig _handler(): Enter 03/11/2003 14:42:15.0063 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 572): install_sig _handler(): Exit rc = 0 03/11/2003 14:42:18.0912 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 530): ReadPass(): Exit - OK 03/11/2003 14:42:18.0912 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 460): ReadPass(): Enter 03/11/2003 14:42:18.0912 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 561): install_sig _handler(): Enter 03/11/2003 14:42:18.0912 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 572): install_sig _handler(): Exit rc = 0 03/11/2003 14:42:21.0515 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 530): ReadPass(): Exit - OK 03/11/2003 14:42:21.0515 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 460): ReadPass(): Enter 03/11/2003 14:42:21.0516 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 561): install_sig _handler(): Enter 03/11/2003 14:42:21.0516 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 572): install_sig _handler(): Exit rc = 0 03/11/2003 14:42:24.0768 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 530): ReadPass(): Exit - OK 03/11/2003 14:42:24.0768 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 425): getPwInput( ): Exit - OK 03/11/2003 14:42:24.0768 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 221): pstdpoPassW ord(): Calling dsmInitEx(). 03/11/2003 14:42:24.0775 [033596] [1] : unx/psutpswd.cpp( 239): pstdpoPassW ord(): Exit - dsmInitEx() failed rc = 2032 03/11/2003 14:42:24.0775 [033596] [1] : tdpoconf.cpp( 621): closeSess() : Enter 03/11/2003 14:42:24.0776 [033596] [1] : tdpoconf.cpp( 630): closeSess() : Exit - OK 03/11/2003 14:42:24.0776 [033596] [1] : tdpoconf.cpp( 499): main(): Exi t - tdpoPassWord() failed. rc = 2032 end of data - close "Gable, Josh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/11/2003 02:33 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: tdpoconf error--- ANS0236E (RC2032) Point your DSMI_ORC_CONFIG to /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt and try it again. Josh Gable EDS Tulsa BUR & Leveraged Storage MD 329 4000 North Mingo Road Tulsa, OK 74116-5020 -Original Message- From: shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tdpoconf error --- ANS0236E (RC2032) Hi All , I have double checked dsm.sys file and other opt file ,no ASSWORDACCESS=generate .. Still I get the following error. has anyone seen this error b
Re: tdpoconf error --- ANS0236E (RC2032)
Defining Options Only the following options can be set in the tdpo.opt file: DSMI_LOG Path for the error log file (tdpoerror.log). For error log files, create a directory for the error logs and have the DSMI_LOG environment variable point to that directory. The user performing backups must have writable rights to this directory. DSMI_ORC_CONFIG Path for the the dsm.opt file used for the TDP for Oracle session. | tried ::: f5n75 />tdpoconf password -tdpo_optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/t> ANS0220E (RC400) An invalid option was found during option parsing. f5n75 />r/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt < ANS0220E (RC400) An invalid option was found during option parsing. "Gable, Josh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/11/2003 02:33 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: tdpoconf error--- ANS0236E (RC2032) Point your DSMI_ORC_CONFIG to /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt and try it again. Josh Gable EDS Tulsa BUR & Leveraged Storage MD 329 4000 North Mingo Road Tulsa, OK 74116-5020 -Original Message- From: shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tdpoconf error --- ANS0236E (RC2032) Hi All , I have double checked dsm.sys file and other opt file ,no ASSWORDACCESS=generate .. Still I get the following error. has anyone seen this error before ?? tdpoconf password -tdpo_optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt *** * Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle Utility * * Password file initialization/update program* * ROOT privilege needed to update value * *** Please enter current password: Please enter new password: Please reenter new password for verification: ANU0162E The passwords entered do not match. Please enter them again. Please enter current password: Please enter new password: Please reenter new password for verification: ANS0236E (RC2032) On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed when PASSWORDACCESS=gener ate. more /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys SErvername f1n05_sw COMMmethod TCPip TCPPort1500 HTTPPort 1581 HTTPSPort 1543 TCPServeraddress f1n05_sw.ere.com TCPBUFFSIZE 32 TCPNODELAY YES TCPWindowsize 1024 TXNBYTELIM 25600 LARGECOMMBUFFERSYES ** * Operations * ** ERRORLOGRETENTION 10,D *PASSWORDDIR /tsg/tsm/security PASSWORDAccess prompt SCHEDLOGNAME /tsg/tsm/dsmsched.log SCHEDLOGRETENTION 10,D *=* * Include/Exclude * *=* inclexcl/tsg/tsm/inclexcl.list f5n75 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin > tdpoconf showenv -tdpo_optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt< TDP FOR ORACLE INFORMATION Version: 2 Release: 2 Level:1 Sublevel: 0 Platform: 32bit TDP Oracle AIX TSM SERVER INFORMATION Server Name: F1N05_SW Server Address: F1N05_SW.ERE.COM Communication Method: TCP/IP SESSION INFORMATION Owner Name: oracle Node Name:F5N75 DSMI_DIR: /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin DSMI_ORC_CONFIG: /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/dsm.opt TDPO_OPTFILE: /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt Password Directory: /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle Compression: FALSE ANS0236E (RC2032) On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed when PASSWORDACCESS=gener ate.
tdpoconf error --- ANS0236E (RC2032)
Hi All , I have double checked dsm.sys file and other opt file ,no ASSWORDACCESS=generate .. Still I get the following error. has anyone seen this error before ?? tdpoconf password -tdpo_optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt *** * Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle Utility * * Password file initialization/update program* * ROOT privilege needed to update value * *** Please enter current password: Please enter new password: Please reenter new password for verification: ANU0162E The passwords entered do not match. Please enter them again. Please enter current password: Please enter new password: Please reenter new password for verification: ANS0236E (RC2032) On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed when PASSWORDACCESS=gener ate. more /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys SErvername f1n05_sw COMMmethod TCPip TCPPort1500 HTTPPort 1581 HTTPSPort 1543 TCPServeraddress f1n05_sw.ere.com TCPBUFFSIZE 32 TCPNODELAY YES TCPWindowsize 1024 TXNBYTELIM 25600 LARGECOMMBUFFERSYES ** * Operations * ** ERRORLOGRETENTION 10,D *PASSWORDDIR /tsg/tsm/security PASSWORDAccess prompt SCHEDLOGNAME /tsg/tsm/dsmsched.log SCHEDLOGRETENTION 10,D *=* * Include/Exclude * *=* inclexcl/tsg/tsm/inclexcl.list f5n75 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin > tdpoconf showenv -tdpo_optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt< TDP FOR ORACLE INFORMATION Version: 2 Release: 2 Level:1 Sublevel: 0 Platform: 32bit TDP Oracle AIX TSM SERVER INFORMATION Server Name: F1N05_SW Server Address: F1N05_SW.ERE.COM Communication Method: TCP/IP SESSION INFORMATION Owner Name: oracle Node Name:F5N75 DSMI_DIR: /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin DSMI_ORC_CONFIG: /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/dsm.opt TDPO_OPTFILE: /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt Password Directory: /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle Compression: FALSE ANS0236E (RC2032) On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed when PASSWORDACCESS=gener ate.
Re: progressive backup vs. full + incremental
what is the difference between full+incremental , incremental and partial incremental ? also when I do dsmc incr which incremental backup procedure is applied ? do I need to always specify subdir=yes to backup all changed (data) files , directories since last incr backup or dsmc incr will take care of it ? Thanks SD Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/05/2003 09:21 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:progressive backup vs. full + incremental Hello everyone! I was wondering why the full + incremental would result in a longer restore time than the progressive backup methodology? From several co-workers point of view they thought that it would be quicker on the full + incremental because you wouldn't have to go back to the beginning backups of the file and restore all of the incrementals, you would just go back to the most recent full backup and apply the incrementals after that point. When I went to explain the reasoning behind this, I had some problems understanding the concept myself, so I was hoping someone could explain both methods and why they differ in restore time and why progressive is better than the full + incremental. Thank you so much for any help you can lend on this matter! Joni Moyer Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338
Re: Problem in Backing Up TSM client on a different network segments
>8.* ip. Backup can >be done but it is very slow. make sure NIC is nailed to 100Mbps full duplex mode on switch and in OS . Perform ftp test on both the interfaces .. compare it ..This is network and not TSM .. Ameerul Mazli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/03/2003 01:32 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Problem in Backing Up TSM client on a different network segments Hi All, Has anyone have the experience of a TSM server (Solaris 2.8) on a 188.* segment backing up TSM clients on a different segments (168.*). They could not ping each other. The TSM server has been hooked up with an additional network card and given another IP (168.*). Now they can ping each other. The TSM clients (AIX) dsm.opt and dsm.sys has been pointed to the 168.* ip. Backup can be done but it is very slow. Do I need to do anything on the TSM server option file (dsmserv.opt) or anything else because I didn't change any TSM server setup? Could I be missing some options? Hoping for an early and favourable reply from anyone. Thanks and regards Ameerul __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Re: StorServer
We are testing it It has good interface . Tommy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/27/2003 02:33 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:StorServer We just had a webcast with StorServer. I was wondering if anyone on the list has used this product or had any opinions on it? We liked it and thought it would be a good TSM management tool to have. Tommy Templeton Senior System Administrator DFA-MMRS 601-359-3106 e-mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Admin web GUI not starting
Yes,that was it. I changed it back to 1581 on feb21 , had to halt and restart tsm server to load http also killed and restarted dsmcad daemon . Thanks . SD f1n05 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin>ls -la dsm.sys -rw-r--r-- 1 root system 1994 Feb 21 09:27 dsm.sys f1n05 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin>grep http dsm.sys f1n05 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin>grep HTTP dsm.sys HTTPPort 1581 HTTPSPort 1543 f1n05 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin> Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/23/2003 05:37 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Admin web GUI not starting Yes, but someone have changed dsm.sys and set client's port to be 1580. If dsmcad is started before rc.adsmserv in inittab ... Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant shekhar Dhotre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 20.02.2003 16:17 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Admin web GUI not starting Hi all , I did reboot on tsm server last night , now when I type http://server Ip:1580 it opens client GUI instead server web admin GUI in browser .I haven't changed anything in dsmserv.opt file ... dsmserv.opt file ** *Communications * ** COMMmethod HTTP COMMmethod TCPIP COMMmethod SHAREDMEM HTTPPort 1580 *HTTPSPort 1543 SHMPort 1510 TCPBUFSIZE 32 TCPNODELAY YES TCPPort 1500 TCPWindowsize 256 *Txnbyte25600 f1n05 />ps -ef | grep dsm root 13454 1 0 Feb 19 - 0:00 ksh /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/rc .adsmserv root 14978 13454 190 Feb 19 - 843:53 dsmserv quiet root 15486 1 0 12:24:34 - 0:07 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm c sched root 19342 15250 0 09:22:05 pts/0 0:00 dsmadmc root 19686 18700 0 09:22:31 pts/2 0:01 dsmadmc -cons root 21392 18422 1 09:10:35 pts/3 0:00 grep dsm root 21604 23316 0 09:07:45 - 0:00 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm agent 10 0 -optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.opt rhunt 22098 20648 0 10:08:17 pts/4 0:01 dsmadmc -console rhunt 22536 22520 0 08:35:34 pts/1 0:00 dsmadmc root 22930 21162 0 16:53:52 pts/5 0:00 dsmadmc root 23316 1 0 08:59:47 - 0:00 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm cad f1n05 /> Thanks SD
Re: Restoring RMAN data onto different server
NO , you can't . Also we can't restore ORAClE DB using TSM which are backedup by RMAN /TDP. RMAN restores it . RMAN on 9i - Guide from Oracle press for more details .. SD Theresa Sarver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/20/2003 05:37 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Restoring RMAN data onto different server Hi All; Environment: SP Complex (7 nodes) AIX 433 ML10 TSM Server 5162 TSM Clients 415 TDP Oracle 110 Oracle Database (RMAN) 817 The DBA's asked me if they could possibly restore one of their test RMAN (817) databases onto a different node, as I do not know the answer to this question I am deferring to all your experts out there. Thank you in advance for the help; Theresa
Admin web GUI not starting
Hi all , I did reboot on tsm server last night , now when I type http://server Ip:1580 it opens client GUI instead server web admin GUI in browser .I haven't changed anything in dsmserv.opt file ... dsmserv.opt file ** *Communications * ** COMMmethod HTTP COMMmethod TCPIP COMMmethod SHAREDMEM HTTPPort 1580 *HTTPSPort 1543 SHMPort 1510 TCPBUFSIZE 32 TCPNODELAY YES TCPPort 1500 TCPWindowsize 256 *Txnbyte25600 f1n05 />ps -ef | grep dsm root 13454 1 0 Feb 19 - 0:00 ksh /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/rc .adsmserv root 14978 13454 190 Feb 19 - 843:53 dsmserv quiet root 15486 1 0 12:24:34 - 0:07 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm c sched root 19342 15250 0 09:22:05 pts/0 0:00 dsmadmc root 19686 18700 0 09:22:31 pts/2 0:01 dsmadmc -cons root 21392 18422 1 09:10:35 pts/3 0:00 grep dsm root 21604 23316 0 09:07:45 - 0:00 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm agent 10 0 -optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.opt rhunt 22098 20648 0 10:08:17 pts/4 0:01 dsmadmc -console rhunt 22536 22520 0 08:35:34 pts/1 0:00 dsmadmc root 22930 21162 0 16:53:52 pts/5 0:00 dsmadmc root 23316 1 0 08:59:47 - 0:00 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm cad f1n05 /> Thanks SD
Re: AW: Ndmp Backup to primary Diskpool
NDMP backups will go directly to dedicated tape drives . Stefan Holzwarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/18/2003 03:17 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:AW: Ndmp Backup to primary Diskpool I want to put the ndmp datastream on diskpools (type file or disk), but i don't know whether it's possible. Regards Stefan holzwarth -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Montag, 17. Februar 2003 20:43 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Ndmp Backup to primary Diskpool Hi If u have filer .Then u should we using ndmpcopy utility on Filer.To copy between volumes on Filer or across filers. I did this recently. Thanks Balanand Pinni -Original Message- From: Stefan Holzwarth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ndmp Backup to primary Diskpool I think about the following environment: TSM Server on Windows2000 with 5 * 2 TByte Primary diskpools on FC Raids (with IDE Disk internal - RAID 5) and 5 * 2 TByte Copy diskpools on FC Raids (with IDE Disk internal - RAID 5) TSM DB on lokal RAID 10 with total 8 disks Together with other NT Systems I want to backup our filer (4TB) over NDMP to that diskpools. Since i have no experience with NDMP (we have TSM on MVS) i wonder whether that config is possible. Does the datastream goe over FC or ip? Kind regards, Stefan Holzwarth -- Stefan Holzwarth ADAC e.V. (Informationsverarbeitung - Systemtechnik - Basisdienste) Am Westpark 8, 81373 München, Tel.: (089) 7676-5212, Fax: (089) 76768924 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A query about NDMP support
I am assuming that these disk vols are nfs mounted over some of the hosts systems in your environment . I use to backup these disks vols locally from the server where it is mounted .There is a option to backup nfs mounted fliesystems . Yes - $4500 per NDMP license . Thanks & regards . Shekhar Dhotre. Sr.Midrange Engineer. Lend Lase , GSDC. PH: 1+404-846-7483 "Jelinek, David G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/18/2003 10:20 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: A query about NDMP support Since I've received no response from the list, I decided to spend a day reading through both the TSM documentation on NDMP and the documentation on NDMP itself. I had thought that NDMP was just a backup protocol that TSM could support. It is not. It is a complete backup system itself. It requires that the drives be attached (dedicated) to it and that it write the tapes itself. This means that you need to share the library and drives (more licenses!) It also needs to manage it's own database of backup data. TSM would only provide a tape storagepool that it would be unable to make a copy of for disaster recovery. TSM would not be able to do tape reclamation on that storage pool either. Basically, it means that NDMP is another backup system to manage, one that does not have the features of TSM that make it most useful to us. As for the 3-way option that Mirapoint would like TSM to implement, it would eliminate the need for the tape drives to be directly connected to the Mirapoint box, It would instead push this off onto yet another box that would be connected to the library and tape drives. Oh, joy! another box to pay for and manage! Of course, I'm sure that they think that the TSM box would be able to house the second NDMP host, possible, but I wouldn't want to manage it. As for adding complete NDMP host capabilities to TSM, well, I expect that eventually that will happen, but not for quite a while. I would not want to use it unless TSM was then able to manage the storagepool like it does it's own. In other words, not unless disaster recovery and tape reclamation were automatically part of the process. In short, we are going to continue using a two stage process for backing up our Mirapoint boxes. We will use the Mirapoint backups to create backup files on another server and then use TSM to backup those files. If I'm wrong about any of this, I'm sure that someone will let me know. *8^) David Jelinek > -Original Message- > From: Jelinek, David G. > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 16:38 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: A query about NDMP support > > > I would like to ask for some expert opinions from this group. > We use MiraPoint's e-mail appliance for our student e-mail. > We would like to back it up using ITSM. MiraPoint has said > that it intends to qualify with TSM. They want us to push > IBM/Tivoli for 3-way NDMP support in TSM. I have no idea if > that's a good thing or not. The reason they said they want us > to push for it is given in this snippet from a discussion > list, but it makes no sense to me at all: > > >I'd again like to stress the strong suggestion that we get the > >customers to press hard for IBM/Tivoli to support 3-way NDMP for TSM. > > > >This is undoubtedly the preferred method - for both > customers and Mirapoint. > >The alternative, which would be very difficult for both > Mirapoint and the > >customers, would be to use a direct connection to the > Mirapoint. This > >method would require us to also qualify the tape device > which is directly > >connected . . . that will add much time, cost and complexity > > > >Please, lets make certain that we get all of these TSM > requests to be echoed > >back to IBM/Tivoli!!! We need 3-way NDMP support in TSM. > > So is 3-way NDMP a good thing to push for? Do their reason(s) > make any sense, and are they valid? Or do they not understand > TSM and NDMP? > > Thanks in advance for your opinions and advice. > > > David Jelinek >
Re: Undocumented TSM commands!!!
I have not used all documented commands yet :-) ,I will try to find for you .. Cheers SD "Chandrasekhar, C.R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/14/2003 05:59 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Undocumented TSM commands!!! Hi All, Can any one help me in finding complete set of undocumented TSM commands or share with me if you have it, I was searching for these commands for a long time. Thanks, C.R.Chandrasekhar. Systems Executive. Tivoli Certified Consultant(TSM). TIMKEN Engineering & Research - INDIA (P) Ltd., Bangalore. Phone No: 91-80-5536113 Ext:3032. Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **
preview=yes during file restore
Hi All, Can I do preview=yes to find out which tapes are required to restore files ? if so what would be the syntax ? Help doesn't show any thing on preview .. Syntax >>-REStore---++---+---+---+- sourcefilespec---+-> '- FILE--' '- options--' '- "sourcefilespec"-' >-+--+->< '- destinationfilespec-' Thank You SD
Re: TSM for Oracle
>As I understand the reply from Neil Rasmussen, Oracle 9.2.x is supported at >TDPO 2.2.1 with exeption for AIX 5 64bit where you need the (TDP) 5.1.5. Not true : Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle for UNIX Installation and User's Guide Version 2 Release 2.1 Preface Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle performs online or offline backups of Oracle8i (Version 8.1.7) and Oracle9i (Version 9.0.1) databases to Tivoli Storage Manager storage. This integration with the RMAN Media Management API maximizes the protection of data, thus providing a comprehensive storage management solution. Thank You Shekhar Dhotre. Sr.Midrange Engineer. Lend Lase , GSDC. PH: 1+404-846-7483 Kolbeinn Josepsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/07/2003 11:59 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM for Oracle As I understand the reply from Neil Rasmussen, Oracle 9.2.x is supported at TDPO 2.2.1 with exeption for AIX 5 64bit where you need the (TDP) 5.1.5. I beleve Neil is answering my question earlier today where I was asking if TDPO 2.2.1 where supported for Oracle 9.2 on HP-UX (11i). So I will try it after the weekend but it seems like the RMAN relinking instructions need to be modified for Oracle 9.2 on HP-UX (not absolutely sure, as the HP box is at customers site). If I understand Neil right, your configuration should be: AIX 4.3.3.10 Oracle 9.2.0.1.0 TDP 2.2.1 TSM client/server 4.2.1 or higher best regards, Kolbeinn shekhar Dhotre cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: TSM for Oracle Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07.02.2003 16:04 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" >As a side note to one of the subsribers questions: "TDP Oracle 2.2.1 >supports Oracle 9i. The only exception is for Oracle 9.2 on AIX 5 64bit, >you will need to download the Data Protection for Oracle 5.1.5 ptf from >IBM ftp site for support on this platform." IS following configuration supported ? AIX 4.3.3.10 Oracle 9.2.0.1.0 TDP 5.1.5 TSM client/server 5.x . I talked to TSM support and they told me that- It will require AIX5.1 instead AIX4.3.3.10 in order to make above configuration work. Thank You Shekhar Dhotre. Sr.Midrange Engineer. Lend Lase , GSDC. Neil Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/07/2003 10:50 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM for Oracle Orin, I see that there are many subscribers willing to help you with whatever you situation is with Data Protection for Oracle. Can you please be more specific (I'm asking for it, huh?) about the complexities being faced? I must assume, because you mention TSM for Oracle, that your troubles stem from the TSM side. Is there anything specific that makes the setup complex? Is it installation, or configuring, or using Data Protection for Oracle or the TSM Server? I look forward to hearing from you. As a side note to one of the subsribers questions: "TDP Oracle 2.2.1 supports Oracle 9i. The only exception is for Oracle 9.2 on AIX 5 64bit, you will need to download the Data Protection for Oracle 5.1.5 ptf from IBM ftp site for support on this platform." -- Date:Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:04:47 -0600 From:Orin Rehorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: TSM for Oracle Due to the complexity of using TSM for Oracle, management here is about ready to replace TSM altogether. Anyone know of a class available for this topic? BTW, IBM has a web page for such a course listed at http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/education/J104126F96394E48.html, but an IBM employee told me the course doesn't actually exist! Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: -- Regards, Neil Rasmussen Software Development TDP for Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TSM for Oracle
>As a side note to one of the subsribers questions: "TDP Oracle 2.2.1 >supports Oracle 9i. The only exception is for Oracle 9.2 on AIX 5 64bit, >you will need to download the Data Protection for Oracle 5.1.5 ptf from >IBM ftp site for support on this platform." IS following configuration supported ? AIX 4.3.3.10 Oracle 9.2.0.1.0 TDP 5.1.5 TSM client/server 5.x . I talked to TSM support and they told me that- It will require AIX5.1 instead AIX4.3.3.10 in order to make above configuration work. Thank You Shekhar Dhotre. Sr.Midrange Engineer. Lend Lase , GSDC. Neil Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/07/2003 10:50 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM for Oracle Orin, I see that there are many subscribers willing to help you with whatever you situation is with Data Protection for Oracle. Can you please be more specific (I'm asking for it, huh?) about the complexities being faced? I must assume, because you mention TSM for Oracle, that your troubles stem from the TSM side. Is there anything specific that makes the setup complex? Is it installation, or configuring, or using Data Protection for Oracle or the TSM Server? I look forward to hearing from you. As a side note to one of the subsribers questions: "TDP Oracle 2.2.1 supports Oracle 9i. The only exception is for Oracle 9.2 on AIX 5 64bit, you will need to download the Data Protection for Oracle 5.1.5 ptf from IBM ftp site for support on this platform." -- Date:Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:04:47 -0600 From:Orin Rehorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: TSM for Oracle Due to the complexity of using TSM for Oracle, management here is about ready to replace TSM altogether. Anyone know of a class available for this topic? BTW, IBM has a web page for such a course listed at http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/education/J104126F96394E48.html, but an IBM employee told me the course doesn't actually exist! Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: -- Regards, Neil Rasmussen Software Development TDP for Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
backup every hour in TSM ..
Hi All, we want to backup oracle transaction logs every hour /everyday of the week .Currently the model of backing up everything once a day permits losing an entire days worth of data which isn't necessary. Any ideas on how I can schedule this job in TSM ? Thank You Shekhar Dhotre. Sr.Midrange Engineer. Lend Lase , GSDC. www.lendlease.com
Re: TDP for Oracle 9.2
There is an upgrade from 2.2.1 tdp which is tdp 5.1.5. Here are the software requirements for tdp for oracle 5.1.5. Looks like aix 5.1 is needed but 9.2 oracle is supported. == Software Requirements - Data Protection for Oracle Version 5 Release 1 requires the following MINIMUM software levels: - AIX 5.1 64bit or higher - Oracle9i (9.2.x) - Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) 4.2. TSM does not have to be on the same machine as Data Protection for Oracle and may be on any platform supported by TSM. - TSM Backup-Archive Client 5.1.1 is required only if the central scheduler service of the TSM Client is used. If so, the TSM Client must reside on the same machine as Data Protection for Oracle. - Tivoli Storage Manager API 5.1.1 included with this package === Also, here is the licensing information for 5.1.5: Data Protection for Oracle version 5.1.5 licensing -- Data Protection for Oracle no longer supports version 2.1 licensing. If you are upgrading Data Protection for Oracle to version 5.1.5 you must use the license supplied with the Data Protection for Oracle 2.2.1 32bit AIX client. To acquire this license you must install the Data Protection for Oracle version 2.2.1 prior to installing the Data Protection for Oracle 5.1.5 ptf. == == Oracle 9.0.1 is supported with tdp for oracle 2.2.1. This is from the 2.2.1 readme: Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle is an Application Programming Interface(API) between the Tivoli Storage Manager API and Oracle8i(8.1.7) or Oracle9i (9.0.1) Recovery Manager(RMAN). Cheers . Shekhar Dhotre. Sr.Midrange Engineer. Lend Lase , GSDC. www.lendlease.com Kolbeinn Josepsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/07/2003 10:08 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:TDP for Oracle 9.2 Hi gurus! I found a lot of queries in the archive regarding if Oracle 9.2 is supported on TDPO 2.2.1 but no replies. Does any know if this is supported? I need Data Protection for Oracle 9.2 running on HP-UX. Refering to the configuration instructions for TDP 2.2.1 the RMAN relinking porcedure does not match for Oracle 9.2 (HP-UX). There is only Oracle Data Protection 5.1.5 awailable for AIX, am I correct? Does any know if the DP 5.1.5 for HP-UX (and Solaris etc.) is coming up? Best regards, Kolbeinn Josepsson 7 Systems Engineer Tivoli Certified Consultant - IBM TSM V5.1 www.nyherji.is
Re: Sun Solaris server backups not ending
There are several ways of changing the default settings and force full-duplex mode; you may need to alter your switch settings as well. Setting through /etc/system set hme:hme_adv_autoneg_cap=0 set hme:hme_adv_100hdx_cap=0 set hme:hme_adv_100fdx_cap=1 Setting with ndd ndd -set /dev/hme adv_autoneg_cap 0 ndd -set /dev/hme adv_100hdx_cap 0 ndd -set /dev/hme adv_100fdx_cap 1 In case you have multiple instances, you need to select the specific hme instance first, e.g., use the following to select hme1: ndd -set /dev/hme instance 1 Thank You Shekhar Dhotre. "Seay, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/07/2003 01:08 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Sun Solaris server backups not ending Your ethernet adapter in the SUN machine probably took the default of AUTO and is trying to continually negotiate with the switch. Change it to Full or half as appropriate and the problem will go away. Seen this time and time again. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Northrop Grumman Information Technology 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sun Solaris server backups not ending Hello again! I have a SUN server Client Version 4.2.1, Client OS level 5.8 on TSM 4.1.3 os/390. My problem is that for a regularly scheduled client backup, the sessions start, but they just sit in idlew/recvw status. It is just backing up about 3 GB of data, but it is taking hours to complete when it usually ends in 15 minutes. I checked to make sure that the disk pool wasn't full and nothing else seemed out of the ordinary. Has anyone had this problem? Any suggestions on what to look at? Thank you! Joni Moyer Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338
Re: TSM for Oracle
I have configured RMAN and TDP for oracle 8.1.7 - and its working great
without any problem - Requires good knowledge of oracle .
i.e. Creating catalog database -tablespace user in oracle etc... if you
don't know oracle then it is difficult - ask help from your DBA , once
you setup oracle part then second step is configure
tdpo.option file - relink - write backup script --
f2n17 /d01/app/oracle > cat bkdb.sh
. /d01/app/oracle/.tdp.ora
rman target / rcvcat rman/rman cmdfile /d01/app/oracle/bkdb.scr msglog
/tmp/bkdb.log
f2n17 /d01/app/oracle > cat bkdb.scr
run {
allocate channel t1 type 'sbt_tape' parms
'ENV=(TDPO_OPTFILE=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt)';
backup
filesperset 4
format 'df_%t_%s_%p'
(database);
release channel t1;
}
f2n17 /d01/app/oracle > ./bkdb.sh
f2n17 /d01/app/oracle >
Done .. where is complexity?
BTW : Does any one know if oracle 9.2.0.1.0 is supported with TDP 2.2.1 ?
Cheers
Shekhar Dhotre
LEnd lease GSDC
Atlanta ,GA-30346.
Jin Bae Chi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/06/2003 01:27 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: TSM for Oracle
Orin,
With due respect, I had a hard time to set it up. But, once I learned
it, it has been working greate for me. If you could share more about the
problem you're encounting, I believe everyone would be willing to help
you. Actually, I got a big help from this list. Our Oracle db is not
very big, but backups works great from TSM scheduler. I don't mean to
doubt your pain dealing with the product. Thanks.
Jin Bae Chi (Gus)
System Admin/Tivoli
Data Center, CSCC
614-287-5270
614-287-5488 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/06/03 12:04PM >>>
Due to the complexity of using TSM for Oracle, management here is
about
ready to replace TSM altogether.
Anyone know of a class available for this topic? BTW, IBM has a web
page for
such a course listed at
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/education/J104126F96394E48.html,
but an
IBM employee told me the course doesn't actually exist!
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site:
access to the object is denied error on netware backups .
Hi all, I am getting following errors when TSM tries to backup one of the netware servers . The TSM admin for this particular TSM server is on vacation and I have limited knowledge of netware. I noticed some of the filenames are long like : DATA1:/llps/Data/Bus Devmnt/One Lend Lease/Project Lend Lease_Commercial & Heritage/Cost Planning_Estimating_Files/SUPERSEDED FOLDERS/00 PRE Hickson Rd Acquisition 01 09/08 Summaries_Cost Comparison/00 HICKSON ROAD Pre DA 01 12/D04 Benchmarking & Analysis/Pre Site Acquire/BT Typ Floor.xls Are there any limitation on character's in file names (max characters filename can have ) in TSM/Netware ? tsm: LLNBUPASP>q actlog Date/TimeMessage -- 02/06/03 00:28:18 ANR0406I Session 13737 started for node PLAZNC03 (NetWare) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.118.67(31850)). 02/06/03 00:28:18 ANR0403I Session 13737 ended for node PLAZNC03 (NetWare). 02/06/03 00:37:08 ANE4007E (Session: 13684, Node: PLAZNC01) Error processing 'DATA1:/llps/Data/Bus Devmnt/One Lend Lease/Project Lend Lease_Commercial & Heritage/Cost Planning_Estimating_Files/SUPERSEDED FOLDERS/00 PRE Hickson Rd Acquisition 01 09/08 Summaries_Cost Comparison/00 HICKSON ROAD Pre DA 01 12/D04 Benchmarking & Analysis/Pre Site Acquire/BT Typ Floor.xls': access to the object is denied Output to screen cancelled. Please wait for the 'tsm>' prompt. tsm: LLNBUPASP>q node PLAZNC01 f=d Node Name: PLAZNC01 Platform: NetWare Client OS Level: 5.0 Client Version: Version 4, Release 1, Level 3.0 Policy Domain Name: SERVER Last Access Date/Time: 02/06/03 00:42:48 Days Since Last Access: <1 Password Set Date/Time: 10/17/02 13:43:07 Days Since Password Set: 112 Invalid Sign-on Count: 0 Locked?: No Contact: (Sydney PLAZA ) tsm: LLNBUPASP>help ANE4007E --- ANE4007E Error processing 'filespace namepath-namefile-name ': access to the object is denied Explanation: Access to the specified file or directory is denied. You tried to read from or write to a file and you do not have access permission for either the file or the directory. System Action: Processing stopped. User Response: Ensure that you specified the correct file or directory name, correct the permissions, or specify a new location. Thanks SD
???????????? in TSM status
Hi All , what does ?? means in TSM status , I am searching in help q eve but don't see anything pointing to ? tsm: LLNBUPASP>q eve * * begind=-1 Scheduled Start Actual Start Schedule Name Node Name Status - - - 02/03/03 18:50:00 02/04/03 08:19:28 MON_NOTES_INC LLNOTESP Restarted 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:19 MON_INC PLAZMN11 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:38:43 MON_INC PLAZML03 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:16 MON_INC PLAZMN30 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:15 MON_INC PLAZMN12 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:16 MON_INC PLAZMN13 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:15 MON_INC PLAZMN14 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:12 MON_INC PLAZNZ01 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/04/03 08:19:38 MON_INC PLAZNC02 Restarted 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:11 MON_INC PLAZNC01 Started 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:14 MON_INC PLAZNC03 (?) 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:20 MON_INC AUSYD01MN601 (?) 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:41:24 MON_INC AUSYD01MZ001 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:14 MON_INC AUSYD01MZ201 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 MON_INC AUSYD01MZ401 Missed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 20:31:13 MON_INC AUSYD01MZ601 Completed 02/03/03 20:31:01 02/03/03 23:39:10 MON_INC AUSYD01MN602 Completed 02/03/03 21:00:00 02/03/03 21:00:12 LLSYDDEV1 LLSYDDEV1 Completed 02/03/03 23:01:00 02/03/03 23:01:03 MON_NDS_INC PLAZNZ01 Completed
Re: RMAN /TDP backup failing with ANS1025E error - resolved
Rana , Regenerated password & changed password for node 17 on TSM , - RMAN and TDP working as expected . f2n17 />tdpoconf password -tdpo_optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/t> *** * Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle Utility * * Password file initialization/update program* * ROOT privilege needed to update value * *** Please enter current password: Please enter new password: Please reenter new password for verification: ANS1361E (RC61) Session Rejected: The specified node name is currently locked tsm: TSM>unlock node f2n17 ANR2066I Node F2N17 unlocked. f2n17 />tdpoconf password -tdpo_optfile=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/t> *** * Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle Utility * * Password file initialization/update program* * ROOT privilege needed to update value * *** Please enter current password: Please enter new password: Please reenter new password for verification: ANU0260I Password successfully changed. f2n17 /tmp>tail -f bkdb.log RMAN-03022: compiling command: backup RMAN-03023: executing command: backup RMAN-08008: channel t1: starting full datafile backupset RMAN-08502: set_count=25 set_stamp=483966944 creation_time=22-JAN-03 RMAN-08010: channel t1: specifying datafile(s) in backupset RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=6 name=/d11/ora/rcv01.dbf RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=1 name=/d10/oradata/v8iback/system.dbf RMAN-08011: including current controlfile in backupset RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=4 name=/d10/oradata/v8iback/user_data.dbf RMAN-08013: channel t1: piece 1 created RMAN-08503: piece handle=df_483966944_25_1 comment=API Version 2.0,MMS Version 2 RMAN-08502: set_count=26 set_stamp=483967059 creation_time=22-JAN-03 RMAN-08010: channel t1: specifying datafile(s) in backupset RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=7 name=/d10/bkupdata/bkup01.db RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=3 name=/d10/orarbs/v8iback/rbs01.dbf RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=2 name=/d10/oratemp/v8iback/temp01.dbf RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=5 name=/d10/oraidx/v8iback/user_index.dbf RMAN-08013: channel t1: piece 1 created RMAN-08503: piece handle=df_483967059_26_1 comment=API Version 2.0,MMS Version 2 .2.1.0 RMAN-08525: backup set complete, elapsed time: 00:01:05 RMAN-03023: executing command: partial resync RMAN-08003: starting partial resync of recovery catalog RMAN-08005: partial resync complete RMAN-03022: compiling command: release RMAN-03023: executing command: release RMAN-08031: released channel: t1 Recovery Manager complete. tsm: TSM>q ses (last line for TDP and oracle ) Sess Comm. Sess Wait Bytes Bytes Sess Platform Client Name Number Method StateTimeSent Recvd Type -- -- -- -- --- --- - 3 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S 10.5 M 139 Admin AIX ASOOD 1,824 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S 10.1 M 142 Admin AIX SUPADMIN 5,665 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S7.1 M 138 Admin AIX DAVE 5,983 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S7.0 M 142 Admin AIX SUPADMIN 12,368 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S2.9 M 142 Admin AIX SUPADMIN 14,783 Tcp/Ip IdleW 35.1 M 18.6 K 542 Admin AIX DAVE 14,947 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S 110.8 K 3.1 M Node AIX F5N67 14,948 Tcp/Ip IdleW 18 S 10.9 K 8.2 G Node AIX F5N67 14,950 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S 38.5 K 154 Admin WinNTSTORSERVER 15,011 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S3.1 M 1.8 M Node AIX F5N67 15,012 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S6.8 K 6.4 G Node AIX F5N67 15,014 Tcp/Ip IdleW 1.8 H 198.1 M 3.9 K Node AIX F3N37 15,021 Tcp/Ip IdleW 1.3 H1.6 K 184 Admin AIX SUPADMIN 15,028 Tcp/Ip IdleW 28.9 M 3.0 K 619 Admin WinNTSTORSERVER 15,029 Tcp/Ip IdleW 28.9 M 525 241 Admin WinNTSTORSERVER 15,036 Tcp/Ip IdleW 9.5 M 339 263 Node AIX F2N21 15,097 Tcp/Ip RecvW0 S6.0 K 12.5 M Node TDP Ora cle AIX - F2N17 Thanks and Regards Shekhar Dhotre. LEnd Lease REI . Atlanta , GA Gagan Singh Rana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/21/2003 10:24 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: RMAN /TDP backup failing with ANS1025E error Dear Shekhar Did u try genetrating password file with "tdpoconf passwd" ?? This could be the possible reason for not getting authenticated. Also use "tdpoconf showenv" to see that all the settings are correct. If u have already created password file, then run that password command agai
RMAN /TDP backup failing with ANS1025E error
Hi all,
client
AIX -4.3.3.10 - (One of the Node of SP complex ) TSM client 4.1.1.3 .
oracle 8.1.7.0
server : AIX (4.3.3.10 ) TSM server - 5.1.1.4
I have configured RMAN/TDP 2.2.1.0 for oracle 8.1.7 database. and It
worked fine first time .Today I tried to run this backup manually and it
is failing with ORA-19511: ANS1025E (RC137) Session rejected: Authentication failure .
oracle or TSM error ?
f2n17 /d01/app/oracle > dsmc q f
Tivoli Storage Manager
Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 1, Level 3.0
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2001, All Rights Reserved.
Node Name: F2N17
Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000
Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.4
Data compression forced on by the server
Server date/time: 01/21/03 11:56:10 Last access: 01/21/03 11:30:49
Num Last Incr Date TypeFile Space Name
--- -- ---
1 01/16/03 20:00:53 JFS /
2 01/16/03 20:00:56 JFS /best1
3 01/16/03 20:01:36 JFS /d01
4 01/16/03 20:01:39 JFS /d10
5 11/28/02 20:07:09 JFS /d11
6 01/16/03 20:01:39 JFS /d80
7 01/16/03 20:00:55 JFS /home
8 11/29/02 02:00:39 API:ORACLE /orc_v8back
9 00/00/00 00:00:00 JFS /tmp
10 01/16/03 20:00:55 JFS /tsmserv
11 01/16/03 20:00:54 JFS /usr
12 01/16/03 20:00:55 JFS /var
f2n17 /d01/app/oracle >
SVRMGR> select * from v$database;
DBID NAME CREATED RESETLOGS_ RESETLOGS PRIOR_RESE PRIOR_RES
LOG_MOD
E CHECKPOINT ARCHIVE_CH CONTROL CONTROLFI CONTROLFIL CONTROLFIL
CONTROLFI OP
EN_RESETL VERSION_T OPEN_MODE
-- - - -- - -- -
---
- -- -- --- - -- --
- --
- - --
3101863237 V8IBACK 24-OCT-02 1 24-OCT-02 0 ARCHIVE
LOG43947 43125 CURRENT 24-OCT-02373 44025
21-JAN-03 NO
T ALLOWED 24-OCT-02 READ WRITE
1 row selected.
SVRMGR> quit
Server Manager complete.
f2n17 /d01/app/oracle > more /tmp/bkdb.log
Recovery Manager: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
RMAN-06005: connected to target database: V8IBACK (DBID=3101863237)
RMAN-06008: connected to recovery catalog database
RMAN> run {
2> allocate channel t1 type 'sbt_tape' parms
3> 'ENV=(TDPO_OPTFILE=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt)';
4> backup
5> filesperset 4
6> format 'df_%t_%s_%p'
7> (database);
8>
9> release channel t1;
10> }
11>
RMAN-03022: compiling command: allocate
RMAN-03023: executing command: allocate
RMAN-08030: allocated channel: t1
RMAN-08500: channel t1: sid=9 devtype=SBT_TAPE
RMAN-08526: channel t1: Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle: version 2.2.1.0
RMAN-03022: compiling command: backup
RMAN-03023: executing command: backup
RMAN-08008: channel t1: starting full datafile backupset
RMAN-08502: set_count=23 set_stamp=483881448 creation_time=21-JAN-03
RMAN-08010: channel t1: specifying datafile(s) in backupset
RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=6 name=/d11/ora/rcv01.dbf
RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=1 name=/d10/oradata/v8iback/system.dbf
RMAN-08011: including current controlfile in backupset
RMAN-08522: input datafile fno=4
name=/d10/oradata/v8iback/user_data.dbf
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-03007: retryable error occurred during execution of command: backup
RMAN-07004: unhandled exception during command execution on channel t1
RMAN-10035: exception raised in RPC: ORA-19506: failed to create
sequential file
, name="df_483881448_23_1", parms=""
ORA-27028: skgfqcre: sbtbackup returned error
ORA-19511: ANS1025E (RC137) Session rejected: Authentication failure
RMAN-10031: ORA-19624 occurred during call to
DBMS_BACKUP_RESTORE.BACKUPPIECECRE
ATE
Recovery Manager complete.
f2n17 /d01/app/oracle >
Thanks and regards .
Shekhar Dhotre .
Sr.Unix Admin
Lend lease REI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sharing tapes between TSM server and NDMP storage
We were backing up Netapps using netbackup - used NDMP agent and configured dedicateddrive- physically connected to netapps. Our Library (STK9710) was mixed 9840 fibre drives and DLT .mail me off-line if you need any other information on netapps backups . Regards SD Tuncel MUTLU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/21/2003 09:48 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:sharing tapes between TSM server and NDMP storage Hi, I had a meeting with NetApps and they told me they can backup using TSM to SAN-connected library. As I understand correctly, they mean the NetApps Filer can connect with a Fiber card to a SAN and can dump its data to a SAN-connected tapes in a library according to TSM commands. I am just curious about if the tape drives have to be dedicated to the NAS, or they can be TSM drives, shared between TSM server and NAS as the sharing between TSM server and other servers or storage agents ? Anyone with experience in that area and is willing to share it with us ? Regards, Tuncel Mutlu * Bu e-posta ve ekleri mesajda gönderildiði belirtilen kiþi yada kiþilere özeldir ve gizlidir. Bu e-posta ve eklerinde yer alan bilgilerin gizlilik yükümlülüðüne uyulmasý gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle, e-posta ve ekleri izinsiz olarak kullanýlamaz, çoðaltýlamaz daðýtýlamaz ve açýklanamaz. Bu e-posta muhatabý ve ilgilisi olmamanýza raðmen tarafýnýza ulaþmýþ ise, lütfen göndericiyi haberdar ediniz ve e-posta ve eklerini sisteminizden derhal siliniz. Bu e-postanýn içeriði sadece gönderene ait olup kuruluþumuzun görüþlerini yansýtmayabilir. Kuruluþumuz bu e-posta ve eklerinin, eksiksiz doðru ve güncel olup olmamasýndan, internet ortamýnda deðiþime uðramasýndan veya geç ulaþmasýndan ve bunlardan doðabilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. Kuruluþumuzun mail sunucusu virüs programlarý ile korunmakta olduðundan, herhangi bir nedenle virüs içeren programlarýn size ulaþmasýndan, sisteminize zarar vermesinden kuruluþumuz sorumlu tutulamaz. Gösterdiðiniz hassasiyet için teþekkür ederiz. This e-mail and any files attached with it are confidential and any opinions contained in this e-mail are those of the sender and may do not necessarily reflect those of our Company. Our company gives no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of this e-mail and accepts no responsibility for changes made after it was sent.If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are kindly requested to notify the sender immediately. Any unauthorized use, copying or resending to other parties of the contents and attachments of this e-mail may be unlawful. Mail Server of our company is under protection of virus programmes and will not be responsible for the e-mails enclosed with virus. Thank you for your co-operation.
reclamation start ?
Guys , How I can start manually reclamation reclamation process just won't start . Storage Pool Name CPOOLLTO Storage Pool Type COPY Device Class Name CLLTO Estimated Capacity (MB) 161585782.5 Pct Util 9.3 Pct Migr - Pct Logical 97.4 High Mig Pct - Low Mig Pct - Migration Processes - Next Storage Pool - Maximum Size Threshold - Access READWRITE Description offsite tape pool Overflow Location - Cache Migrated Files? - Collocate? NO Reclamation Threshold 100 Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed 1000 Delay Period for Volume Reuse 0 Migration in Progress? - Amount Migrated (MB) - Elapsed Migration Time (seconds) - Reclamation in Progress? No Volume Being Migrated/Reclaimed - Last Update Date/Time 2003-01-09 13:49:33.00 Last Update by (administrator) ASOOD Reclaim Storage Pool - Migration Delay - Migration Continue - Storage Pool Data Format Native Copy Storage Pool(s) - Continue Copy on Error? - CRC Data NO Thank You Shekhar Dhotre. PH: 1+404-846-7483
Re: Objects compressed by
>Sending data through LAN so fast assumes mighty server, isn't it? cannot say mighty but its good configuration 8-way power3 processor *8Gb RAM and since this is one of the SP node ,has high speed SP switch . Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/09/2003 08:11 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Objects compressed by Yes, usually TSM node-compression gets better compression ratio that tape drive compression. In your case the numbers mean TSM client transmitted to server 5.29 GB while have read files totalling approx. 21.16 GB. I am curious why your client node spent nearly three hours to read those 21 GB. Sending data through LAN so fast assumes mighty server, isn't it? Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant shekhar Dhotre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08.01.2003 21:17 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Objects compressed by Does Objects compressed by mean , TSM compressed data by 75% ? Total number of objects inspected: 13,974 Total number of objects archived:12,784 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 5.29 GB Data transfer time: 51.56 sec Network data transfer rate:107,623.69 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate:566.38 KB/sec Objects compressed by: 75% Elapsed processing time: 02:43:19 Thank You SD
Objects compressed by
Does Objects compressed by mean , TSM compressed data by 75% ? Total number of objects inspected: 13,974 Total number of objects archived:12,784 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 5.29 GB Data transfer time: 51.56 sec Network data transfer rate:107,623.69 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate:566.38 KB/sec Objects compressed by: 75% Elapsed processing time: 02:43:19 Thank You SD
Re: Format of output file using select statements
i am using something like this ...
#This perl script can be used to send diffrent types of allerts from TSM
server
#Don`t make any changes in this script unless you know perl and how to
fix it .
# This should remove all the header lines from TSM output
# thus giving you a usable report to do as you wish
# It opens an argument and a temporary file
# strips the headers from the temp file
# and then renames the temp file to the
# original filename
#rename ( $tmpfilename, $filename );
my $filename = "/tmp/file.out"; #$ARGV[0];
my $tmpfilename = "/tmp/file2.out";
my $script;
$script="$ARGV[0] $ARGV[1]";
system ($script);
open ( FH , "$filename" ) || die "no open $!";
open ( FH2 , "> $tmpfilename" ) || die "no open $!";
# should open two files, a temp and the orig
while () {
if ( $_ =~ /^(Tivoli|Command|\(C\)|\s|ANS8002I|ANR1462I|ANS8000I)/ ) {
} else {
print FH2 $_;
}
}
close ( FH );
close ( FH2 );
#my $people="shekhar.dhotre\@lendleaserei.com" ;
my
$people="shekhar.dhotre\@lendleaserei.com,adrian.ortiz\@lendleaserei.com,davi
";
system("mailx -s\"Midrange ATLANTA- Daily backup status\" $people \<
/tmp/file2
.out" );
unlink $filename;
unlink $tmpfilename;
Matt Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/07/2003 08:27 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Format of output file using select statements
At 23:33 -0600 1/6/03, Roger Deschner wrote:
>Neither of these formats, which were designed to be human-readable, are
>particularly easy for re-digestion by a computer program of any kind -
>especially when a field is split across lines.
One of the challenges to machine-readable output from dsmadmc is all
the extra stuff it wraps around the output, e.g:
--
Tivoli Storage Manager
Command Line Administrative Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.0
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved.
Session established with server UKCCSERVER1: Solaris 7/8
Server Version 4, Release 2, Level 3.0
Server date/time: 01/07/03 08:15:20 Last access: 01/07/03 08:14:44
(stuff I really want)
ANS8002I Highest return code was 0.
--
People here have suggested various ingenious combinations of
tail/awk/grep to strip out the garbage, and they work fairly well.
But that seems a little Rube Goldbergish, and I'm a little worried
that it might break if something in the output changes. I think I
already know the answer (No), but does anybody know of a way to keep
that stuff from appearing in the output, instead of finding it and
throwing it away afterwards?
--
Matt Simpson -- OS/390 Support
219 McVey Hall -- (859) 257-2900 x300
University Of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506
mainframe -- An obsolete device still used by thousands of obsolete
companies serving billions of obsolete customers and making huge obsolete
profits for their obsolete shareholders. And this year's run twice as
fast
as last year's.
Re: restore to different node
What are the reasons if there are any to use -virtualnodename over set access ? I don't have problems in setting access . in my last command date format was wrong. 2-1-2003 won't work - It requires 02-01-2003 . also added quotes . "/tmp/sh28642.6" 1 line, 136 characters dsmc ret -fromnode=f2n21 -fromdate=02-01-2003 -todate=02-01-2003 -subdir=yes '/d 90/oradata/approd/backup/*' /d90/oradata/apuat0/backup/ Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. Retrieve function invoked. Node Name: F5N73 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.4 Data compression forced on by the server Server date/time: 03-01-2003 11:35:43 Last access: 03-01-2003 11:34:08 Retrieving 2,560 /d90/oradata/approd/backup/log --> /d90/oradata/apuat 0/backup/backup/log [Done] Retrieving 512 /d90/oradata/approd/backup/temp --> /d90/oradata/apua t0/backup/backup/temp [Done] ** Interrupted ** ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. < 0 B> [ - ] Justin Bleistein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/03/2003 11:09 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: restore to different node A better option to use for this is: "-virtualnode" if your able to get the remote node's TSM password. Also try to put double quotes around any path specifications with wildcards. Thanks!. --Justin Richard Bleistein Unix Systems Administrator (Sungard eSourcing) Desk: (856) 866 - 4017 Cell:(856) 912 - 0861 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] shekhar Dhotre cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: restore to different node Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/03/2003 11:08 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Trying to retrieve data from one node to different node : source node f2n21 (frame 2 node 21 ) target node f5n73 (frame 5 node 73 ) f2n21 />dsmc q ac Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. Node Name: F2N21 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.4 Server date/time: 03-01-2003 10:59:48 Last access: 03-01-2003 09:12:16 Type NodeUserPath Archive F5N73 * /d90/oradata/approd/backup/* ANS1148I 'Query Access' command successfully completed dsmc ret -fromnode=f2n21 -fromdate=1-2-2003 -todate=1-2-2003 -subdir=yes /d90/oradata/approd/backup/*.Z /d90/oradata/apuat0/backup/ dsmc ret -fromnode=f2n21 -fromdate=1-2-2003 -todate=1-2-2003 -subdir=yes /d90/or adata/approd/backup/* /d90/oradata/apuat0/backup/ Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. Retrieve function invoked. Node Name: F5N73 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.4 Data compression forced on by the server Server date/time: 03-01-2003 10:55:53 Last access: 03-01-2003 09:39:16 ANS1302E No objects on server match query can I use wild card characters in this retrive ? like *.* / * or *.Z to restore all files ending with .Z I want to restore /d90/oradata/approd/backup/*.Z to /d90/oradata/apuat0/backup/ Thank You SD
restore to different node
Trying to retrieve data from one node to different node : source node f2n21 (frame 2 node 21 ) target node f5n73 (frame 5 node 73 ) f2n21 />dsmc q ac Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. Node Name: F2N21 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.4 Server date/time: 03-01-2003 10:59:48 Last access: 03-01-2003 09:12:16 Type NodeUserPath Archive F5N73 * /d90/oradata/approd/backup/* ANS1148I 'Query Access' command successfully completed dsmc ret -fromnode=f2n21 -fromdate=1-2-2003 -todate=1-2-2003 -subdir=yes /d90/oradata/approd/backup/*.Z /d90/oradata/apuat0/backup/ dsmc ret -fromnode=f2n21 -fromdate=1-2-2003 -todate=1-2-2003 -subdir=yes /d90/or adata/approd/backup/* /d90/oradata/apuat0/backup/ Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. Retrieve function invoked. Node Name: F5N73 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.4 Data compression forced on by the server Server date/time: 03-01-2003 10:55:53 Last access: 03-01-2003 09:39:16 ANS1302E No objects on server match query can I use wild card characters in this retrive ? like *.* / * or *.Z to restore all files ending with .Z I want to restore /d90/oradata/approd/backup/*.Z to /d90/oradata/apuat0/backup/ Thank You SD
Re: TSM Scheduler shows backups completed successfully dsmerror. log shows backups failed ?
I spent one week explaining Our DBA`s that TSM is backing up your databases and all data is safe regardless of dsmerror..log file errors they see everyday . Had to prove them by restoring some of the data. Can't do restore test on weekly basis to prove them that TSM is backing up your data. That's why I asked this question on list, and found out that I am not alone who is having this problem. Hopefully IBM will address this issue. Thank You SD Kathleen Hallahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/30/2002 11:24 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM Scheduler shows backups completed successfully dsmerror. log shows backups failed ? I might try running this for a few days to see what kind of results I get. However, we have filespaces added and removed pretty frequently, so I'm not sure yet if my results would be valid. I will see what it does, though. What I'd really like to see, of course, is the TSM server report the actual status of backups more accurately, rather than having to devise workarounds. So far that functionality doesn't seem to be planned for the product, however, at least based on my discussions with IBM/Tivoli. "Nelson, Doug" cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: TSM Scheduler shows backups completed successfully "ADSM: Dist dsmerror. log shows backups failed ? Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] IST.EDU> 12/30/2002 10:56 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" We have a script that runs as part of our morning report that shows file spaces that have not been backed up in the last 24 hrs. It has been very successful in catching the ones that say "completed" but didn't really do it. select node_name,filespace_name,backup_end from - filespaces where 1 < - days(current_timestamp) - days(backup_end) or - backup_end is null Douglas C. Nelson Distributed Computing Consultant Alltel Information Services Chittenden Data Center 2 Burlington Square Burlington, Vt. 05401 802-660-2336 -Original Message- From: Kathleen Hallahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM Scheduler shows backups completed successfully dsmerror.log shows backups failed ? This is an issue we have raised with Tivoli ourselves recently, even requesting--and being turned down for-- a Design Change Request. Their recommendation was to check the dsmsched.logs on the clients. This is impossible for us and presumably for anyone in a large envorinment; we have over 800 clients and I know there are organizations out there with many more. As it is, we've had to write an AIX script to catch the ones that report as "In Progress," considering that they are rarely, if ever, actually in progress at that time. I have no idea how to chase down the ones reporting as "Completed" when in fact they have not, on a daily basis across our entire environment. If anyone has any workable solutions I'd be very interested in hearing them; I'm at a bit of a loss myself. Mark Stapleton cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: TSM Scheduler shows backups completed successfully "ADSM: Dist dsmerror.log shows backups failed ? Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] IST.EDU> 12/29/2002 09:58 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 14:07, shekhar Dhotre wrote: > q eve * * shows all backups are completing successfully but clients > dsmerror.log file shows schedule command failed ,How I can verify that > these backups are completing successfully other than restore test? > > 26-12-2002 20:45:08 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. > 26-12-2002 20:45:08 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'EMEAPROD_HOT_DAILY' failed. Remember that the *schedule* itself completed successfully. You're far better off looking for the message numbers that appear in the summaries that appear in the server activity log at the end of a successsful backup. (I'm not within reach of a TSM server tonight, so I can't look them ATM.) This is a much better indicator of successful backups than the event list. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: TSM Scheduler shows backups completed successfully dsmerror.log shows backups failed ?
Andy , Here is the information on TSM client and server . Server : 5.1.1.0 Client : 5.1.5.0 TSM server is Configured on one of the node of RS/6000 SP system(AIX433-10 ) and client is also AIX node 4.33.10. - TSM schedule is calling a shell scriptwhich does following : Part 1 alter tablespace ,beginbackup - dumps oracle database files in one of the file systems - Part 2 TSM archives filesystems using proper management classes. f2n21 />dsmc Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. tsm> f1n05 />dsmadmc Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Administrative Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. Thank You SD Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/30/2002 05:05 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM Scheduler shows backups completed successfully dsmerror.log shows backups failed ? You don't indicate which TSM client and server versions you are running, nor do you indicate what the scheduled event is doing. In general, though, I would say that this behavior is a probable bug and should be reported to IBM support. -- Starting with version 5.1, the output from QUERY EVENT FORMAT=DETAILED should more accurately reflect the status of the scheduled event (See the chapter on "Automating Tasks", section "Return codes from the command line interface" in the client manual for details). As I mentioned above, you did not say what the scheduled command was. However, some caveats for scheduled events where ACTION=COMMAND: 1) If the command ends with a nonzero return code that is less than 12, the event will be reported as "Complete" (note that QUERY EVENT FORMAT=DETAILED will show the return code). This problem is described in APAR IC35203. 2) If the command is executed asynchronously, then it is not possible for TSM to track the outcome, in which case the event will be reported as "Complete" with return code 0. For example: ;my script start command1 ;command1 launched asynchronously exit lastrc ;command1 launched successfully, exits with rc 0 Note: the "scripts" in this post are written in a "pseudo" code to illustrate my meaning, and do not represent actual working scripts. If you wish to see a more accurate status reported to TSM, then the command should be configured to run synchronously (if possible). For example: ;my modified script command1 ;run command1, wait for completion exit lastrc ;exits with rc from command1 3) If the command is a script that includes several commands, and each of those commands may or may not end with return code 0, but ultimately the script exits with a return code of 0, then the event will be reported as "Complete" with return code 0. For instance, if the script does this: ;my script command1 ;fails with lastrc = 4 command2 ;succeeds with lastrc = 0 exit lastrc ;exits with rc 0 In this case, if you wish to see a more accurate status reported to TSM, then the script will need to be modified to exit with a nonzero return code as appropriate (i.e. the script will need to track the return code from each command within the script, then exit with a nonzero return code if any command fails). For instance: ;my modified script to exit with highest rc set scriptrc = 0 ;initialize scriptrc command1 ;fails with lastrc = 4 if lastrc > scriptrc then scriptrc = lastrc ;scriptrc = 4 command2 ;succeeds with lastrc = 0 if lastrc > scriptrc then scriptrc = lastrc ;scriptrc still = 4 exit scriptrc ;exits with rc 4 If the script contains commands that execute asynchronously, then it is not possible for the script (or TSM) to track the outcome of the asynchronous command(s). Refer to (2) above. -- If you are not using the 5.1 client, then try the 5.1 client to see if it makes a difference. If the 5.1 client still violates the behaviors described above, then this is (probably) a bug and should be reported to IBM support. For example, I would expect that 5.1 should report a completion status of "Failed" for the behavior you describe. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply) The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough&qu
TSM Scheduler shows backups completed successfully dsmerror.log shows backups failed ?
Hi All , q eve * * shows all backups are completing successfully but clients dsmerror.log file shows schedule command failed ,How I can verify that these backups are completing successfully other than restore test? 26-12-2002 20:45:08 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. 26-12-2002 20:45:08 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'EMEAPROD_HOT_DAILY' failed. Retur tsm: TSM>q eve * * begindate=today-1 Scheduled Start Actual Start Schedule Name Node Name Status - - - 12/26/02 01:00:00 12/26/02 01:02:06 AMERUAT_HOT_- F5N73 Completed DAILY 12/26/02 01:58:42 12/26/02 01:58:44 F2N17_CMD F2N17 Completed 12/26/02 02:25:29 12/26/02 02:32:57 F3N45_DAILY_- F3N45 Completed BACKUP 12/26/02 03:00:00 12/26/02 03:00:10 F2N29_DAILY_- F2N29 Completed BACKUP 12/26/02 05:00:00 12/26/02 05:01:15 F3N47_DAILY_- F3N47 Completed BACKUP 12/26/02 06:00:00 12/26/02 06:01:00 F3N43_DAILY_- F3N43 Completed BACKUP 12/26/02 09:00:00 12/26/02 12:06:30 CPD39_DAILY_- F3N37 Completed BACKUP 12/26/02 10:00:00 12/26/02 10:00:03 CPA35_DAILY F3N35 Completed 12/26/02 19:00:00 12/26/02 19:13:01 EMEAPROD_HOT- F2N21 Completed _DAILY 12/26/02 19:18:00 12/26/02 19:19:30 SPCWS SPCWS01 Completed 12/26/02 19:35:00 12/26/02 19:48:18 TAHODEV_HOT_- F5N67 Completed DAILY more... ( to continue, 'C' to cancel) tsm: TSM>q eve * * Scheduled Start Actual Start Schedule Name Node Name Status - - - 12/27/02 01:00:00 12/27/02 01:01:20 AMERUAT_HOT_- F5N73 Completed DAILY 12/27/02 01:58:42 12/27/02 01:58:44 F2N17_CMD F2N17 Completed 12/27/02 02:25:29 12/27/02 02:32:59 F3N45_DAILY_- F3N45 Completed BACKUP 12/27/02 03:00:00 12/27/02 03:44:02 APUAT0_COLD_- F5N73 Completed DAILY 12/27/02 03:00:00 12/27/02 03:04:38 F2N29_DAILY_- F2N29 Completed BACKUP 12/27/02 05:00:00 12/27/02 05:06:44 F3N47_DAILY_- F3N47 Completed BACKUP 12/27/02 06:00:00 12/27/02 06:07:10 F3N43_DAILY_- F3N43 Completed BACKUP 12/27/02 09:00:00 12/27/02 11:47:14 CPD39_DAILY_- F3N37 Completed BACKUP 12/27/02 10:00:00 12/27/02 10:00:03 CPA35_DAILY F3N35 Completed 12/27/02 11:00:00 12/27/02 11:06:23 APPROD_HOT_D- F2N21 Completed AILY f2n21 /tsg/tsm>more dsmerror.log 26-12-2002 20:45:08 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. 26-12-2002 20:45:08 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'EMEAPROD_HOT_DAILY' failed. Retur n code = 1. 27-12-2002 08:50:15 ANS1038S Invalid option specified 27-12-2002 08:50:15 ANS1820E Command line options must be preceded by a '-' 27-12-2002 08:50:31 ANS1038S Invalid option specified 27-12-2002 08:50:31 ANS1820E Command line options must be preceded by a '-' 27-12-2002 08:50:42 ANS1038S Invalid option specified 27-12-2002 08:50:42 ANS1820E Command line options must be preceded by a '-' 27-12-2002 08:50:56 ANS1038S Invalid option specified 27-12-2002 08:50:56 ANS1820E Command line options must be preceded by a '-' 27-12-2002 08:51:00 ANS1038S Invalid option specified 27-12-2002 08:51:00 ANS1820E Command line options must be preceded by a '-' 27-12-2002 08:51:05 ANS1038S Invalid option specified 27-12-2002 08:51:05 ANS1820E Command line options must be preceded by a '-' 27-12-2002 13:10:19 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. 27-12-2002 13:10:19 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'APPROD_HOT_DAILY' failed. Return code = 1. 27-12-2002 13:10:19 ANS1005E TCP/IP read error on socket = 6, errno = 73, reason : 'A connection with a remote socket was reset by that socket.'. Thank You SD
backups failing with ANS1005E error
Hi All , I am getting following errors in dsmerror.log file . 25-12-2002 11:04:54 ANS8034E Your administrator ID is not recognized by this ser ver. 25-12-2002 11:04:54 ANS8023E Unable to establish session with server. 25-12-2002 13:09:41 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'APPROD_HOT_DAILY' failed. Return code = 1. 25-12-2002 13:09:42 ANS1005E TCP/IP read error on socket = 6, errno = 73, reason : A connection with a remote socket was reset by that socket. 25-12-2002 13:09:42 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'. Executing scheduled command now. 25-12-2002 11:06:12 Node Name: F2N21 25-12-2002 11:06:12 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 25-12-2002 11:06:12 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.4 25-12-2002 11:06:12 Server date/time: 25-12-2002 11:06:12 Last access: 25-12 2002 08:36:12 more dsmsched.log 25-12-2002 11:06:12 Executing Operating System command or script: /tsg/tsm/tsm_bkup_approd21.sh 25-12-2002 13:09:41 Finished command. Return code is: 1 25-12-2002 13:09:41 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'APPROD_HOT_DAILY' failed. Return code = 1. 25-12-2002 13:09:41 Sending results for scheduled event 'APPROD_HOT_DAILY'. 25-12-2002 13:09:42 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 25-12-2002 13:09:42 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.4 25-12-2002 13:09:42 Server date/time: 25-12-2002 13:09:42 Last access: 25-12 2002 12:46:26 25-12-2002 13:09:42 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'APPROD_HOT_DAIL '. 25-12-2002 13:09:42 ANS1483I Schedule log pruning started. 25-12-2002 13:09:42 Schedule Log Prune: 844 lines processed. 59 lines pruned. 25-12-2002 13:09:42 ANS1484I Schedule log pruning finished successfully. 25-12-2002 13:09:42 Querying server for next scheduled event. 25-12-2002 13:09:42 Node Name: F2N21 tsm: TSM>q opt Server Option Option Setting Server Option Option Setting - - CommTimeOut 7,000IdleTimeOut 120 BufPoolSize 524288 LogPoolSize 2048 MessageFormat 1Language en_US MaxSessions 75 ExpInterval 0 f2n21 /tsg/tsm>dsmc q sched shows no problem with admin password Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved. Node Name: F2N21 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.4 Server date/time: 25-12-2002 13:32:21 Last access: 25-12-2002 13:28:05 Schedule Name: EMEAPROD_HOT_DAILY Description: EMEAPROD_HOT_DAILY Action: Command Options: Objects: /tsg/tsm/tsm_bkup_emeaprod.sh Priority: 5 Next Execution: 5 Hours and 28 Minutes Duration: 1 Hour Period: 1 Day Day of Week: Any Expire: Never Schedule Name: EMEAPROD_HOT_TOTAPE Description: backup of emaprod to tape Action: Command Options: Objects: /tsg/tsm/emeaman.sh Priority: 5 Next Execution: 7 Hours and 28 Minutes Duration: 1 Minute Period: 1 Day Day of Week: Any Expire: Never Schedule Name: APPROD_HOT_DAILY Description: Daily hot backup of Appprod Action: Command Options: Objects: /tsg/tsm/tsm_bkup_approd21.sh Priority: 5 Next Execution: 21 Hours and 28 Minutes Duration: 1 Hour Period: 1 Day Day of Week: Any Expire: Never What could cause this problem ? Thank You SD
Tivoli monitoring visa TEC
Hi All , We want to be able to send events from TSM to Tivoli Event Console (TEC). What is needed to send these events to TEC? Thank You SD
system state backup for Windows2000
I have question from NT administrator on system state backups .. Can TSM backup system state ? if so what server/client versions are supported ? Thank You SD
Re: Include Backup and Archive data to different mgmtclasses
I am using following script , See if it helps ... #!/usr/bin/ksh # File name is TSM_BKUP.sh # This script is used to backup files and directories using TSM. DOW=`date "+%w"` DOM=`date "+%e"` DOY=`date "+%j"` # Set the Management class for the backup. if [ $DOY = 001 ] then MGMTCL=yeardkmc else if [ $DOW = 6 ] then if [ $DOM -le 7 ] then MGMTCL=monthdkmc else MGMTCL=weekdkmc fi else MGMTCL=dailydkmc fi fi cd /tsg/tsm # Backup the Applications directories. dsmc archive /opt/coins9/live/ /opt/coins9/live/data/ /opt/coins9/col/ /opt/coin s9/col/data/ -subdir=yes -archmc=$MGMTCL -description="`uname -n`_appdir_`date " +%d/%m/%Y"`" >> /tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_`date "+%d%m%Y"` sleep 5 # Compress the log file of the backup of the apps directories. if [ -a /tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_`date "+%d%m%Y"`.Z ] then rm /tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_`date "+%d%m%Y"`.Z else compress /tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_`date "+%d%m%Y"` fi sleep 5 # Create a report of the log file from appdir. zcat /tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_`date "+%d%m%Y"`.Z | grep -v "^Directory" |grep -v "^S pecial File" |grep -v "^Normal File" |grep -v "ANS1898I" | grep -v "^Symbolic Li nk" > /tmp/appdir_`date "+%d%m%Y"` exit 0 f2n27 /tsg/tsm> Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+404-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us . "Cook, Dwight E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/25/2002 11:40 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Include Backup and Archive data to different mgmtclasses To bind archive data to a different management class, look at the -archmc=blah option of the archive command. Maybe that will work for you... dsmc archive -pass=blah -archmc=MC2 -subdir=yes c:\temp\* Dwight -Original Message- From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Include Backup and Archive data to different mgmtclasses I am trying to bind a subset of files to a mgmtclass of MC1 for backup data and MC2 for archive data. Is this possible? My option file has: Include.backup c:\temp\* MC1 Include.archive c:\temp\* MC2 Data backed up is bound to the proper MC (MC1) but the archived data is also bound to MC1. I'm running 5.1.1.3 win32 client. Thanks, Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg
Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52
Manuel, you are right , actlog shows that password has expired . in dsm.sys file I have passwordaccess=generate . Where is the password parameter? so that I can reset it ? when I add new node in tsm ,I do dsmc on client and enter password for the first time and tsm stores/uses it . ERRORLOGRETENTION 10,D PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE PASSWORDDIR /tsg/tsm/security SCHEDLOGNAME /tsg/tsm/dsmsched.log SCHEDLOGRETENTION 10,D tsm: TSM>q actlog begindate=11/19/2002 begintime=06:00:00 endtime=07:40:00 Date/TimeMessage -- 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0406I Session 608 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47241)). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0425W Session 608 for node F1N15 (AIX) refused - password has expired. 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0403I Session 608 ended for node F1N15 (AIX). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0406I Session 609 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47242)). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0403I Session 609 ended for node F1N15 (AIX). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0406I Session 610 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47243)). 11/19/02 06:00:03 ANR0406I Session 611 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47244)). 11/19/02 06:00:05 ANR0403I Session 611 ended for node F1N15 (AIX). Manuel Schweiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/2002 10:29 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Have you checked if your password is still valid? If I am remembering right then 52 notes that your password has expired. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: "shekhar Dhotre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Server rejected session; result code: 52 > Greetings All, > > Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? > > f1n15 /tsg/tsm>more dsmerror.log > > 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 > > 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from > server > 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' > failed > 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' > failed > 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z > ' failed > 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 > 02.Z' failed > 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with > failur > es. > > > Thank You and Best regards. > > Shekhar Dhotre > Midrange Engineer. > lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 > PH: 1+405-846-7483 > FAX:1+404-848-2887 > Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] > visit Us at www.lendlease.com > > This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only > for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended > recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for > delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you > have > received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us . >
Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52
h .. If I start dsmc incr session , TSM won't ask me for password ,it starts backing up . Normal File--> 1,431 /etc/vfs [Sent] Normal File--> 101 /etc/xtab [Sent] Normal File--> 1,310 /etc/xtiso.conf [Sent] Directory--> 512 /etc/IMNSearch/data [Sent] Directory--> 512 /etc/IMNSearch/httpdlite [Sent] Directory--> 512 /etc/IMNSearch/work [Sent] Normal File-->62 /etc/IMNSearch/.imnhelp [Sent] ANS1898I * Processed 1,000 files * Total number of objects inspected:1,161 Total number of objects backed up:0 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 299.09 KB Data transfer time:0.00 sec Network data transfer rate:93,701.96 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate:220.83 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:01 f1n15 /tsg/tsm> Manuel Schweiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/2002 10:29 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Have you checked if your password is still valid? If I am remembering right then 52 notes that your password has expired. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: "shekhar Dhotre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Server rejected session; result code: 52 > Greetings All, > > Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? > > f1n15 /tsg/tsm>more dsmerror.log > > 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 > > 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from > server > 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' > failed > 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' > failed > 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z > ' failed > 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 > 02.Z' failed > 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with > failur > es. > > > Thank You and Best regards. > > Shekhar Dhotre > Midrange Engineer. > lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 > PH: 1+405-846-7483 > FAX:1+404-848-2887 > Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] > visit Us at www.lendlease.com > > This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only > for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended > recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for > delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you > have > received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us . >
Server rejected session; result code: 52
Greetings All, Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? f1n15 /tsg/tsm>more dsmerror.log 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from server 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z ' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 02.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with failur es. Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+405-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us .
Re: Oracle v9.2 and TDP for Oracle
Wholey, Joseph , TDP 2.2.1 is supported with oracle 9i . i have it running on one of the spnode . f2n17 />lslpp -l tivoli.tsm.client.oracle.64bit Fileset Level State Description Path: /usr/lib/objrepos tivoli.tsm.client.oracle.64bit 2.2.1.0 COMMITTED for Oracle on AIX Shekhar, Oracle 9i is not supported with TDP 2.1.1. Here are the requirements for 2.1.1.0 Operating System: AIX 4.3.1 or higher Software Requirements: - Tivoli Storage Manager API 3.7.2 included with this package - Oracle7 Version 7.3.4 with Enterprise Backup Utility 2.2 - Oracle8 Version 8.0.3, 8.0.4, 8.0.5, or 8.1.5 Keep in mind however, that TDP for Oracle 2.1.1.0 is no longer supported. TDP for Oracle 2.2.1 does support Oracle 9i. It is a purchase upgrade. Thanks, Benjamin J. Ramsey IBM Global Services - Staff Software Engineer 1177 BeltLine Rd. Coppell, TX 75019 TL 482-8283[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You and Best regards. ^^^^ Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+404-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us . "Wholey, Joseph (TGA\\MLOL)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/18/2002 12:24 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Oracle v9.2 and TDP for Oracle Anyone know when or if there are plans for TDP to support Oracle v9.2?
Re: Oracle v9.2 and TDP for Oracle
6_1
List of Datafiles Included
File Name LV Type Ckp SCNCkp Time
- -- --
-
2/d10/oratemp/v8iback/temp01.dbf 0 Full 43779 17-NOV-02
3/d10/orarbs/v8iback/rbs01.dbf 0 Full 43779 17-NOV-02
5/d10/oraidx/v8iback/user_index.dbf0 Full 43779 17-NOV-02
7/d10/bkupdata/bkup01.db 0 Full 43779 17-NOV-02
List of Backup Sets
Key Recid Stamp LV Set Stamp Set Count Completion Time
--- -- -- -- -- --
--
124 7 478271987 0 478271902 7 18-NOV-02
List of Backup Pieces
Key Pc# Cp# Status Completion TimePiece Name
--- --- --- --- --
126 1 1 AVAILABLE 18-NOV-02 df_478271902_7_1
List of Datafiles Included
File Name LV Type Ckp SCNCkp Time
- -- --
-
1/d10/oradata/v8iback/system.dbf 0 Full 43864 18-NOV-02
4/d10/oradata/v8iback/user_data.dbf0 Full 43864 18-NOV-02
6/d11/ora/rcv01.dbf0 Full 43864 18-NOV-02
List of Backup Sets
Key Recid Stamp LV Set Stamp Set Count Completion Time
--- -- -- -- -- --
--
125 8 478272006 0 478271987 8 18-NOV-02
List of Backup Pieces
Key Pc# Cp# Status Completion TimePiece Name
--- --- --- --- --
127 1 1 AVAILABLE 18-NOV-02 df_478271987_8_1
List of Datafiles Included
File Name LV Type Ckp SCNCkp Time
- -- --
-
2/d10/oratemp/v8iback/temp01.dbf 0 Full 43865 18-NOV-02
3/d10/orarbs/v8iback/rbs01.dbf 0 Full 43865 18-NOV-02
5/d10/oraidx/v8iback/user_index.dbf0 Full 43865 18-NOV-02
7/d10/bkupdata/bkup01.db 0 Full 43865 18-NOV-02
RMAN>
deleted and restored test tablespace
f2n17 /tmp > more redb.log
Recovery Manager: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
RMAN-06005: connected to target database: V8IBACK (DBID=3101863237)
RMAN-06008: connected to recovery catalog database
RMAN> run {
2> allocate channel t1 type 'sbt_tape' parms
3> 'ENV=(TDPO_OPTFILE=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt)';
4> restore tablespace bkup_data;
5> recover tablespace bkup_data;
6> release channel t1;
7> }
8>
RMAN-03022: compiling command: allocate
RMAN-03023: executing command: allocate
RMAN-08030: allocated channel: t1
RMAN-08500: channel t1: sid=11 devtype=SBT_TAPE
RMAN-08526: channel t1: Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle: version 2.2.1.0
(RMAN and TDP are communicating to restore data )
RMAN-03022: compiling command: restore
RMAN-03024: performing implicit full resync of recovery catalog
RMAN-03023: executing command: full resync
RMAN-08002: starting full resync of recovery catalog
RMAN-08004: full resync complete
RMAN-03022: compiling command: IRESTORE
RMAN-03023: executing command: IRESTORE
RMAN-08016: channel t1: starting datafile backupset restore
RMAN-08502: set_count=6 set_stamp=478216942 creation_time=17-NOV-02
RMAN-08089: channel t1: specifying datafile(s) to restore from backup set
RMAN-08523: restoring datafile 7 to /d10/bkupdata/bkup01.db
RMAN-08023: channel t1: restored backup piece 1
RMAN-08511: piece handle=df_478216942_6_1 tag=null params=NULL
RMAN-08024: channel t1: restore complete
RMAN-03023: executing command: partial resync
RMAN-08003: starting partial resync of recovery catalog
RMAN-08005: partial resync complete
RMAN-03022: compiling command: recover
RMAN-03022: compiling command: recover(1)
RMAN-03022: compiling command: recover(2)
RMAN-03022: compiling command: recover(3)
RMAN-03023: executing command: recover(3)
RMAN-08054: starting media recovery
RMAN-08055: media recovery complete
RMAN-03022: compiling command: recover(4)
RMAN-03022: compiling command: release
RMAN-03023: executing command: release
RMAN-08031: released channel: t1
Recovery Manager complete.
Thank You and Best regards.
Shekhar Dhotre
Midrange Engineer.
lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346
PH: 1+404-846-7483
FAX:1+404-848-2887
Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
visit Us at www.lendlease.com
This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only
for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended
recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination or copying
schedule pending
Greetings All, quick question about scheduling : I have schedule named CPA35_DAILY which shows pending .. sched daemon is running on node cpa35 .. f3n35 />ps -ef | grep dsmc root 3476 79140 24 10:57:30 pts/1 4:16 dsmc root 65466 1 10 23:48:39 - 16:27 /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched root 80394 66178 0 11:12:40 pts/3 0:00 grep dsmc f3n35 /> What other parameters should I check to get this going ? am I missing something ? tsm: TSM>q eve * * Scheduled Start Actual Start Schedule Name Node Name Status - - - 11/18/02 01:58:42 11/18/02 01:59:09 F2N17_CMD F2N17 Completed 11/18/02 10:30:00 CPA35_DAILY F3N35 Pending 11/18/02 11:25:45 F2N21_APPROD- F2N21 Future 11/18/02 16:02:00 DAILY_ARCHIVE F3N47 Future 11/18/02 17:01:10 DAILY_PROD_I- CPD21 Future NCR 11/18/02 19:18:00 SPCWS SPCWS01 Future 11/18/02 19:35:33 SPCWS_CMD SPCWS01 Future 11/18/02 20:25:06 F2N17_INC F2N17 Future Thanks and best regards . SD
solution for Oracle DB hot baclkups
All, We are evaluating different products to backup oracle database online, testing SQL-backtrack for oracle from BMC and some other products. We don't have any information on TDP as such how does it work and how complex it is to configure with RAMN. If anyone out there using TDP.. Can you please share your experience about this product and issues involved in it? About sqlbacktrac: One of the consultant told us that whenever you change oracle version or apply patch to oracle SQL-backtrack breaks and won't work until BMC releases new patch for it . Thanks SD
Re: WIndows NT Disaster Recovery
Prassana , I am not having problem until restoring NT image from Ghost . Once you restore NT from Ghost and reboot the NT server I am connecting to TSM server (RS/6000) . And I am restoring everything to C:\ (Winnt . adsm.sys ,boot.ini etc..) When you try to restore Registry file from adsm.sys directory to c: \winnt\system32\configdirectory ..WinNT does not allow to do so. as Registry from Ghost is already active in the above location . (When I restore from Veritas, It overwrites everything, on the image created by Ghost Don't know how?) I am able to restore registry (adsm.sys ) , if I install NT in c:\junk directory . have you restored files from adsm.sys directory to c:\winnt\system32\config location when you restore from Ghost ? if So how ? Thanks Shekhar Dhotre Unix/Tivoli Admin. "Ghanekar, Prasanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 03:01:34 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: WIndows NT Disaster Recovery This is How GHOST performs Windows NT Recovery, Ghost 2001 runs from outside the Windows Operating system. When you install Ghost, it creates a boot disk that contains variety of drivers including Ghost program. The disk is designed to be universally compatible so it works on most of the NT servers. Once you boot that server with this functional disk, you can create an image file of the disk or partition containing windows operating system and applications. You could also tell the program to place that image ona disk, CD or multiple CD's. It has different levels of compression levels built within the program. You could also make the CD where you place an image to be a bootable CD. While restoring, you simply insert the CD into the drive and boot from it. Youer server will automatically load ghost from the CD, and the files from the Backup set will be available right aaway. This process also works from outside windows, you don't have to go through installing operating system. It completely restores your operating system including device drivers and applications associated with it. I hope this Helps. Prasanna -Original Message- From: Shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WIndows NT Disaster Recovery So should i ask WINNT folks to drop /winnt directory to D: instead C: ? thats what you mean ? and thenrestore everything (BAckup , WINNT ,data to C: drive ? shekhar Thomas Denier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 11:28:50 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: WIndows NT Disaster Recovery Quoting Shekhar Dhotre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Thanks for reply . > So from your thoughts it seems to me that I cannot recover NT server > using Ghost > . > I don't know How Veritas does it ,Nt admins installs NT from Ghost , > and > Veritas administrator > overwrites everything that is on NT BOX . (Including winnt.,registry > ,boot.ini > etc..) . No registry problems. > We are switching from Veritas to Tivoli .. And NT admins are asking > me to > implement ant same method for WinNT DR . You can use Ghost as a quick way to install the recovery system that is used to run TSM restores of the production system. As far as I know, that is the only way Ghost and TSM can cooperate in restoring a Windows NT system. Sites that use Ghost this way generally put the recovery system and its TSM client software in a separate partition rather than non-standard folders in the production partition. =?iso-8859-1?Q?$RFC822.eml?=
Re: RAID-5 Vs Mirroring
That is impossible :-) "Vibhute, Bandu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 02:57:17 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: RAID-5 Vs Mirroring How did you lost database ? We are running some of databases in RAID-5, if two cards lost means it's threat to our data . After replacing SAA-Ada did you lost disks also? Thank you, Bandu Vibhute, Bestfoods Baking Company, 55 Paradise Lane, Bay Shore, NY, 11706 Voice: 631-951-5212, Cell: 516-702-0323 -Original Message- From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RAID-5 Vs Mirroring One comment about the raid - we got away from SSA hardware raid after we had two SSA card failures that caused the loss of the database. If I were forced to use raid, I would have the second copy, and put the raids on separate SSA cards. Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_ BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' St. Louis, Missouri'---''(_/--' `-'\_) Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Mahesh Babbar wrote: > Hi all, > > Environment: > > NSM 3466, RS 6000, AIX 4.3.2 , TSM version 3.7.4, > > 12 x 18.2 GB disk ( for DB and Diskpool Volumes) > > My current DB is of 80 GB size and is alarmingly utililized ( 95 > %).The DB volulmes are mirrored inside TSM ( Second Copy). > > Therefore another 80 GB space is being used for the second copies. In > order to have more usable space for DB, a suggestion has been mooted > to go for RAID-5 at the hardware level. > > IBM's version is that since a second copy MUST be kept , going for > RAID 5 shall require more disk space. Now my question is: > > 1. With the RAID 5 at AIX level, should a second, synchronized copy > of DB volumes is required. > > 2. If I do not keep a second copy and take daily full backup, would it > be RISKY. > > 3. Configuring RAID 5 at this juncture, would anybody see any pitfall > ahead. > > Any comments are welcome! > > Regards > > MAhesh > "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/23/01 11:30:20 - The origin of this electronic mail message was the Internet. Bestfoods Baking cannot validate the authenticity of the sender and therefore cannot be held accountable for any content within. === "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/23/01 15:05:43 - This message may contain confidential and trade secret information of Bestfoods Baking, and be subject to the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. For recipient's use only. If you have received this message in error, please delete immediately, and alert the sender. === $RFC822.eml
Re: AdsmConnect agent for SQL 7
, TDP for MS SQL 2.2.0 is not available for download because it is a new product, not an upgrade. It is licensed separately from version 1. You will have to contact a Tivoli sales representative to purchase version 2. However, TDP for MS SQL 1.1.2 can do full and log backups of SQL 2000 databases. There are many other features and capabilities that make version 2 worth having but version 1 will do the basic backups and restores. Keep in mind, though, that backups created by version 1 cannot be restored using version 2, only version 1. Dean Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 01:14:56 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: AdsmConnect agent for SQL 7 Is SQL version 2.2.0.0.1 available for download. I can only find 1.1.2 on the Tivoli web site. Thanks Dean >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/23/01 11:40AM >>> Tivoli Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 1.1.2.01 supports SQL Server 7.0 and TSM Server Version 3. See http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/tdp_ms.html#SQL and http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/pubs/v3pubs/v1_html/mssql/ab5mtfrm htm The latest version is 2.2.0.01 but it requires TSM Server 3.7.4 or later. Bob KingIBM Global Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Zosimo Noriega (ADNOC IS&T)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 02:09:35 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: AdsmConnect agent for SQL 7 Hi All, What version of ADSMConnect agent supports SQL 7.0 for adsm server 3.1.0.2.40? any help is really appreciated. Zosi Noriega ADNOC P.O. Box 898 AUH UAE $RFC822.eml
Re: AdsmConnect agent for SQL 7
I did not find SQL version 2.2.0.0.1 on Tivoli `s Web site .. searched in the morning .. shekhar Dean Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 01:14:56 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: AdsmConnect agent for SQL 7 Is SQL version 2.2.0.0.1 available for download. I can only find 1.1.2 on the Tivoli web site. Thanks Dean >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/23/01 11:40AM >>> Tivoli Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 1.1.2.01 supports SQL Server 7.0 and TSM Server Version 3. See http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/tdp_ms.html#SQL and http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/pubs/v3pubs/v1_html/mssql/ab5mtfrm htm The latest version is 2.2.0.01 but it requires TSM Server 3.7.4 or later. Bob KingIBM Global Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Zosimo Noriega (ADNOC IS&T)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 02:09:35 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: AdsmConnect agent for SQL 7 Hi All, What version of ADSMConnect agent supports SQL 7.0 for adsm server 3.1.0.2.40? any help is really appreciated. Zosi Noriega ADNOC P.O. Box 898 AUH UAE $RFC822.eml
Re: WIndows NT Disaster Recovery
So should i ask WINNT folks to drop /winnt directory to D: instead C: ? thats what you mean ? and thenrestore everything (BAckup , WINNT ,data to C: drive ? shekhar Thomas Denier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 11:28:50 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: WIndows NT Disaster Recovery Quoting Shekhar Dhotre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Thanks for reply . > So from your thoughts it seems to me that I cannot recover NT server > using Ghost > . > I don't know How Veritas does it ,Nt admins installs NT from Ghost , > and > Veritas administrator > overwrites everything that is on NT BOX . (Including winnt.,registry > ,boot.ini > etc..) . No registry problems. > We are switching from Veritas to Tivoli .. And NT admins are asking > me to > implement ant same method for WinNT DR . You can use Ghost as a quick way to install the recovery system that is used to run TSM restores of the production system. As far as I know, that is the only way Ghost and TSM can cooperate in restoring a Windows NT system. Sites that use Ghost this way generally put the recovery system and its TSM client software in a separate partition rather than non-standard folders in the production partition. $RFC822.eml
Re: AdsmConnect agent for SQL 7
Can anyone share there dsm.opt and data retension policies for SQL server 7 . Thanks shekhar Dhotre. Unix/tivoli Admin. Robert L King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 12:40:13 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: AdsmConnect agent for SQL 7 Tivoli Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 1.1.2.01 supports SQL Server 7.0 and TSM Server Version 3. See http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/tdp_ms.html#SQL and http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/pubs/v3pubs/v1_html/mssql/ab5mtfrm.htm The latest version is 2.2.0.01 but it requires TSM Server 3.7.4 or later. Bob KingIBM Global Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Zosimo Noriega (ADNOC IS&T)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 02:09:35 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: AdsmConnect agent for SQL 7 Hi All, What version of ADSMConnect agent supports SQL 7.0 for adsm server 3.1.0.2.40? any help is really appreciated. Zosi Noriega ADNOC P.O. Box 898 AUH UAE $RFC822.eml
Re: Why diskdirs pools
Also consider performance about disk to disk backup VS . disk to tape .. (Mount time etc..) shekhar Patrick Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 12:38:30 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Why diskdirs pools The main benefit that I see is that you can backup more clients simultaneously than you have tape drives in your library. For example, if you want to backup 10 clients at the same time and only have 4 tape drives 6 of the clients will just sit there waiting for tape mounts. If they backup up to a disk pool first then you don't have this problem. Quoting "Vibhute, Bandu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Salman, > > It depends on how you implement DISKDIRPOOL. It takes very less space > compared to file data. There are various options to keep it in primary > pools. You can use cache feature and keep it in disk pool. > If you are restoring from disaster DISKDIRPOOL can be restored from > offsite > tape first and then files. > > Bandu > -Original Message- > From: Arshad Sheikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Why diskdirs pools > > > Forgive my naiveness but why one need to take the backup of dirs on > disk > pools, I read that it makes restores efficiently, but when you dirs pool > is > copied to tape to offisite, and then when you try to restore it from > tape, > then having a struture on one tape and restoring data from other tape is > not > relevant as the restore is pretty much sequential, or am very wrong > here. > > Salman > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > "WorldSecure Server " made the following > annotations on 04/20/01 20:19:53 > > - > The origin of this electronic mail message was the Internet. > Bestfoods Baking cannot validate the authenticity > of the sender and therefore cannot be held accountable > for any content within. > === > > > > "WorldSecure Server " made the following > annotations on 04/23/01 12:06:34 > - > This message may contain confidential and trade secret information of > Bestfoods Baking, and be subject to the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. > For recipient's use only. If you have received this message in error, > please delete immediately, and alert the sender. > > === > Staff Sig... $RFC822.eml
Re: Why diskdirs pools
>If you are restoring from disaster DISKDIRPOOL can be restored from offsite >tape first and then files. you can restore data/files directally from offsite tapes ..No need to restore Diskdirpools first .. shekhar Dhotre Unix/Tivoli Admin Bayer Corp. "Vibhute, Bandu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 11:53:03 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Why diskdirs pools Salman, It depends on how you implement DISKDIRPOOL. It takes very less space compared to file data. There are various options to keep it in primary pools. You can use cache feature and keep it in disk pool. If you are restoring from disaster DISKDIRPOOL can be restored from offsite tape first and then files. Bandu -Original Message- From: Arshad Sheikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why diskdirs pools Forgive my naiveness but why one need to take the backup of dirs on disk pools, I read that it makes restores efficiently, but when you dirs pool is copied to tape to offisite, and then when you try to restore it from tape, then having a struture on one tape and restoring data from other tape is not relevant as the restore is pretty much sequential, or am very wrong here. Salman _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/20/01 20:19:53 - The origin of this electronic mail message was the Internet. Bestfoods Baking cannot validate the authenticity of the sender and therefore cannot be held accountable for any content within. === "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/23/01 12:06:34 - This message may contain confidential and trade secret information of Bestfoods Baking, and be subject to the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. For recipient's use only. If you have received this message in error, please delete immediately, and alert the sender. === $RFC822.eml
Re: WIndows NT Disaster Recovery
Thanks for reply . So from your thoughts it seems to me that I cannot recover NT server using Ghost . I don't know How Veritas does it ,Nt admins installs NT from Ghost , and Veritas administrator overwrites everything that is on NT BOX . (Including winnt.,registry ,boot.ini etc..) . No registry problems. We are switching from Veritas to Tivoli .. And NT admins are asking me to implement ant same method for WinNT DR . shekhar . Ruddy STOUDER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/23/2001 02:30:46 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: WIndows NT Disaster Recovery Problem with reinstalling a ghost image is that NT in this ghost image is installed in the same directory as the one which is on the TSM backup => conflicts. That's why the intermediate step of installing NT in a "temporary" directory is mandatory so you can restore the backed up NT to its original location without any conflicts between the "running" NT located in a tmporary location and the "backed up" NT restored to its original location. Working like this, do not simply restore the registry oterwize it will scratch the registry of your "temporary" NT but restore the registry to an alternate location (the one of the restored NT). Ruddy Stouder System Engineer I.R.I.S. Rue du Bosquet 10 - Parc Scientifique de Louvain-La-Neuve B- 1435 Mont-Saint-Guibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.irislink.com Tel: +32 (0)10 48 75 10 - Fax: +32 (0)10 48 75 40 -Original Message- From: Shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: vendredi 20 avril 2001 17:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WIndows NT Disaster Recovery Hi , First I apologies to pop this question again on the list as it is discussed 'n 'number of times . But after digging through adsm.org ,I did not found anything ..that is related to my problem. The procedure Given by "Wanda Prather " to recover Windows NT server at Coderelief worked very well for me.. I.e. install NT in junk directory .install tsm client restore reboot ..done .. Thanks Wanda Now I am trying to recover NT using Norton Ghost.. This will eliminate the step to reinstall NT and TSM client in junk and also save some time ( idea from NT -folks ) . I tried following : Install NT from Ghost image . Connect to TSM - drop down all data .. to NT Box (WINNT .adsm.sys etc..) problem : Windows NT gives messages like sharing violation etc.. When I tried to restore registry keys from adsm.sys directory to /winnt/system32/config.. I am not able to do so as registry is already in use. If I reboot Nt box ntoskerenl.exe not found message .. what is the solution to this problem or how I can restore registry .. I used #dsmc regrest entire .. where does the registry gets restored when you execute this command -- in adsm.sys or to original location .. /winnt/system32/config.. ? Thanks Shekhar =?iso-8859-1?Q?$RFC822.eml?=
WIndows NT Disaster Recovery
Hi , First I apologies to pop this question again on the list as it is discussed 'n 'number of times . But after digging through adsm.org ,I did not found anything ..that is related to my problem. The procedure Given by "Wanda Prather " to recover Windows NT server at Coderelief worked very well for me.. I.e. install NT in junk directory .install tsm client restore reboot ..done .. Thanks Wanda Now I am trying to recover NT using Norton Ghost.. This will eliminate the step to reinstall NT and TSM client in junk and also save some time ( idea from NT -folks ) . I tried following : Install NT from Ghost image . Connect to TSM - drop down all data .. to NT Box (WINNT .adsm.sys etc..) problem : Windows NT gives messages like sharing violation etc.. When I tried to restore registry keys from adsm.sys directory to /winnt/system32/config.. I am not able to do so as registry is already in use. If I reboot Nt box ntoskerenl.exe not found message .. what is the solution to this problem or how I can restore registry .. I used #dsmc regrest entire .. where does the registry gets restored when you execute this command -- in adsm.sys or to original location .. /winnt/system32/config.. ? Thanks Shekhar
Re: ACSLS Timeouts
Where i can define this options in dsmserv.opt ? or is it in ACSLA? shekhar "Burton, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/20/2001 08:47:18 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ACSLS Timeouts Try changing the server option "AcsTimeoutX" to 100 We sometimes have ejects sitting in the cap for 10 to 11 hours before operators have a chance to remove them. Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Warren, Matthew James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 4:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACSLS Timeouts Hello, I have a problem at the moment; We have an ACSLS library. Whenever we do tape offsiting using DRM, the move drm * wherestate=mountable tostate=vault fails, because the tapes are left in the library cap / io station for longer than 10 mins. ACSLS returns the following; 04/19/01 14:10:16 ANR8856E ACSAPI sequence(125) request(16792) timed out, elapse time=00:10:07. 04/19/01 14:10:16 ANR8855E ACSAPI(acs_eject_volume) response with unsuccessful status, status=STATUS_IPC_FAILURE. It fails becuase the vaulting command is run at 14:00 each day but operators may not remove the tapes for up to 2 hours after that. That tapes sit in the IO cap, after 10 mins ACSLS is reporting back to TSM saying request timed out, but later the ops remove the tapes and they are no longer in the library. TSM thinks they are. Does anyone know how to chenge the length of the timeout for eject requests from TSM in an ACSLS managed library? Thanks, Matt. ___ Matthew Warren. GZPTXW EDS Core Infrastructure, UK Technical Services Group, Wavendon Tower, Milton Keynes. +44(0)1908284481 ___ $RFC822.eml
Re: ACSLS Timeouts
I know this .. login to ACSLS unit as acssa issue following commands : --ACSLS 5.3.0-- 0, 0, 2, 0 online in use MED245 DLT7000 0, 0, 2, 1 online available DLT7000 0, 0, 2, 2 online available DLT7000 0, 0, 2, 3 online available DLT7000 0, 0, 2, 4 online available DLT7000 0, 0, 2, 5 online available DLT7000 ACSSA> vary Type(acs/cap/drive/lsm/port): port Port identifier(acs,port): 0,0 Port identifier(acs,port): State(diagnostic/offline/online): vary acs,cap ,lsm and port offline and vary again online ..everything will be fine . Regards Shekhar Dhotre Unix/Tivoli Admin Bayer Corp. "Warren, Matthew James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/20/2001 04:39:49 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: ACSLS Timeouts Hello, I have a problem at the moment; We have an ACSLS library. Whenever we do tape offsiting using DRM, the move drm * wherestate=mountable tostate=vault fails, because the tapes are left in the library cap / io station for longer than 10 mins. ACSLS returns the following; 04/19/01 14:10:16 ANR8856E ACSAPI sequence(125) request(16792) timed out, elapse time=00:10:07. 04/19/01 14:10:16 ANR8855E ACSAPI(acs_eject_volume) response with unsuccessful status, status=STATUS_IPC_FAILURE. It fails becuase the vaulting command is run at 14:00 each day but operators may not remove the tapes for up to 2 hours after that. That tapes sit in the IO cap, after 10 mins ACSLS is reporting back to TSM saying request timed out, but later the ops remove the tapes and they are no longer in the library. TSM thinks they are. Does anyone know how to chenge the length of the timeout for eject requests from TSM in an ACSLS managed library? Thanks, Matt. ___ Matthew Warren. GZPTXW EDS Core Infrastructure, UK Technical Services Group, Wavendon Tower, Milton Keynes. +44(0)1908284481 ___ $RFC822.eml
Re: Backup Set generation
Bandu , use following command : generate backupset [nodename] [backupsetname] dev=3D3590 (replave this with your 4mm ) Examples of supported media devices are: tape, CD-ROM drives, removable disk drives like JAZ drives and ZIP drives. These tape devices are supported: DLT, 4mm, 8mm, 3590, and 3570. shekhar Dhotre Unix/Tivoli Admin Bayer Corp. "Vibhute, Bandu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/19/2001 02:32:19 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Backup Set generation Hello All, Does anybody have experience with backup set generation on 4mm/8mm internal DAT drives? Any help or suggestions will be appreciated. Thank you, Bandu Vibhute, Bestfoods Baking Company, 55 Paradise Lane, Bay Shore, NY, 11706 Voice: 631-951-5212, Cell: 516-702-0323 "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/19/01 14:41:26 - This message may contain confidential and trade secret information of Bestfoods Baking, and be subject to the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. For recipient's use only. If you have received this message in error, please delete immediately, and alert the sender. === $RFC822.eml
Re: Full DB log file causing TCP/IP Connection Failure
>connect to TSM, you can set communication method as SharedMem in dsmserv.opt >and dsm.sys, which doesn't use TCP/IP and run dsmserv from server itself. If Mike is running TSm4.1 server on Win2k where dsm.sys does`t come in picture . Shekhar Dhotre Unix/tivoli Admin Bayer Corp. "Vibhute, Bandu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/19/2001 03:00:27 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Full DB log file causing TCP/IP Connection Failure Mike, Try running "dsmadmc" from server console. If that doesn't allow you to connect to TSM, you can set communication method as SharedMem in dsmserv.opt and dsm.sys, which doesn't use TCP/IP and run dsmserv from server itself. If you able to log in to TSM, you have to first increase log. Hope this will help you. Thank you, Bandu Vibhute, Bestfoods Baking Company, 55 Paradise Lane, Bay Shore, NY, 11706 Voice: 631-951-5212, Cell: 516-702-0323 -Original Message- From: Michael Zylberstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Full DB log file causing TCP/IP Connection Failure I am running TSM 4.1 on Win2K and TSM is refusing all connections. I believe I know what has caused the problem, but I am not sure what to do about it. The door to my IBM 3583 LTO library was left open over the long weekend and TSM was unable to do a DB backup. As such, the log file was never truncated and has completely run out of space. Since this has occurred, I have been unable to make any type of connection to TSM. Whether I try to attempt with a client, the web administrator or even the admin command line, I get a TCP/IP Connection Problem error. Somebody please HELP! Any suggestions would be appreciated. Mike Zylberstein Internet Systems Engineer, Net-Ops Funder OnLine Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 905-331-9105 x.277 Mobile: 416-560-0518 "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/19/01 14:41:42 - The origin of this electronic mail message was the Internet. Bestfoods Baking cannot validate the authenticity of the sender and therefore cannot be held accountable for any content within. === "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/19/01 15:09:31 - This message may contain confidential and trade secret information of Bestfoods Baking, and be subject to the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. For recipient's use only. If you have received this message in error, please delete immediately, and alert the sender. === $RFC822.eml
Re: 3.7 to 4.1 and the license issue
Thats dumb .. "Vibhute, Bandu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/17/2001 02:52:53 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: 3.7 to 4.1 and the license issue Yes, you do. -Original Message- From: Tyree, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3.7 to 4.1 and the license issue Can someone explain just what the change in licensing is all about? We need to do the 3.7 to 4.1 update soon. We have 75 licenses running right now in version 3.7. Am I going to lose these and have to start from scratch? David Tyree Microcomputer Specialist South Georgia Medical Center 229.333.1155 Confidential Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/17/01 14:44:19 - The origin of this electronic mail message was the Internet. Bestfoods Baking cannot validate the authenticity of the sender and therefore cannot be held accountable for any content within. === "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/17/01 15:01:36 - This message may contain confidential and trade secret information of Bestfoods Baking, and be subject to the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. For recipient's use only. If you have received this message in error, please delete immediately, and alert the sender. === $RFC822.eml
Re: Test tape drive for read/write and clean tape drives
Bandu , here is the Syntax for Cleaning drive, before issuing following command .. label a cleaning tape and checkin in to library . Shekhar Dhotre. Sys Admin . Bayer Corporation Medfiled Ma-02056 CLEAN DRIVE (Clean a Drive) Use this command when you want TSM to immediately load a cleaner cartridge into a drive regardless of the cleaning frequency. Note: Do not use this command for SCSI libraries that have their own automatic cleaning in the device hardware (for example, STK 9710, IBM 3570, and IBM 3575). >>-CLEAN DRIVE--library_name--drive_name--->< Parameters library_name (Required) Specifies the name of the library to which the drive is assigned. drive_name (Required) Specifies the name of the drive. Examples Task You have already defined a library named AUTOLIB by using the DEFINE LIBRARY command. Inform the server that TAPEDRIVE3 in this library requires cleaning. Command: clean drive autolib tapedrive3 "Vibhute, Bandu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/17/2001 12:53:03 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Test tape drive for read/write and clean tape drives Hello *SMrs, Any one know procedure to clean tape drives manually through TSM and test for read/write operations? Thank you, Bandu Vibhute, Bestfoods Baking Company, 55 Paradise Lane, Bay Shore, NY, 11706 Voice: 631-951-5212, Cell: 516-702-0323 "WorldSecure Server " made the following annotations on 04/17/01 13:01:46 - This message may contain confidential and trade secret information of Bestfoods Baking, and be subject to the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. For recipient's use only. If you have received this message in error, please delete immediately, and alert the sender. === $RFC822.eml
Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
# oslevel -q
Known Maintenance Levels
4.3.3.0
4.3.2.0
4.3.1.0
Shawn Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/16/2001 09:21:02 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
How about an oslevel -q ?
--
Shawn Raymond
Sr. Technical Consultant
Synergy, Inc.
518-782-3457
Shekhar
DhotreTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help
Needed..
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU>
04/12/01 02:52 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
# oslevel -l 4.3.3.0
#
RETURNS NOTHING ..
Shawn Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/12/2001 02:39:44 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Run oslevel -l 4.3.3.0 to list the filesets that are not up to date. You
may have to do an update_all on all 4 of the AIX 4.3.3 CD's then run the
ML8 update_all again.
--
Shawn Raymond
Sr. Technical Consultant
Synergy, Inc.
518-782-3457
Shekhar
DhotreTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus..
.Help
Needed..
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU>
04/10/01 06:04 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
I installed ML08 on AIX 4.3.3 .0 today
and issued command
# oslevel
4.3.2.0
# instfix -ik 4330-08_AIX_ML
All filesets for 4330-08_AIX_ML were found.
# instfix -ciqk 4330-08_AIX_ML | grep ":-:"
is this ok ---4.3.2.0 ?
Shekhar Dhotre
UniX /Tivoli Admin .
Bayer Corp.
508-520-7821 .
Shawn Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/10/2001 08:46:03 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Update your perfagent.tools to 2.2.33.50. svmon was broken in the previous
few releases.
--
Shawn Raymond
Sr. Technical Consultant
Synergy, Inc.
518-782-3457
Shekhar
DhotreTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus..
.Help
Needed..
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU>
04/09/01 04:53 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
I am trying to execute svmon but , getting following error ..any idea ?
medrs2:ps -aef | grep dsmserv
root 42134 1 0 Apr 02 - 2474:14 dsmserv
root 48518 47810 1 16:36:56 pts/10 0:00 grep dsmserv
medrs2:sh /usr/bin/svmon -P 42134
sh: /usr/bin/svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied.
medrs2:id
uid=0(root) gid=0(system)
groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit)
medrs2:
medrs2:svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:/usr/bin/svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:cd /usr/bin
medrs2:./svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:sh svmon
sh: svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied.
medrs2:echo $PATH
/usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin
Thanks
shekhar ..
George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/09/2001 03:19:45 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Herve, Where am going wrong here???
# ps -aef | grep dsmserv
root 30300 34772 0 Apr 07 - 606:00 dsmserv quiet
# svmon -P 30300
Pid Command Inuse Pin Pgspace
64-bit
30300*** process does not exist ***
Drop me a note off line and help me out... I am not sure why it is coming
back
and
saying that my TSM server is not running thanks-
George Lesho
Storage/System Admin
AFC Enterprises
"Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/06/2001 10:23:05
Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
# oslevel -l 4.3.3.0
#
RETURNS NOTHING ..
Shawn Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/12/2001 02:39:44 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Run oslevel -l 4.3.3.0 to list the filesets that are not up to date. You
may have to do an update_all on all 4 of the AIX 4.3.3 CD's then run the
ML8 update_all again.
--
Shawn Raymond
Sr. Technical Consultant
Synergy, Inc.
518-782-3457
Shekhar
DhotreTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help
Needed..
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU>
04/10/01 06:04 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
I installed ML08 on AIX 4.3.3 .0 today
and issued command
# oslevel
4.3.2.0
# instfix -ik 4330-08_AIX_ML
All filesets for 4330-08_AIX_ML were found.
# instfix -ciqk 4330-08_AIX_ML | grep ":-:"
is this ok ---4.3.2.0 ?
Shekhar Dhotre
UniX /Tivoli Admin .
Bayer Corp.
508-520-7821 .
Shawn Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/10/2001 08:46:03 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Update your perfagent.tools to 2.2.33.50. svmon was broken in the previous
few releases.
--
Shawn Raymond
Sr. Technical Consultant
Synergy, Inc.
518-782-3457
Shekhar
DhotreTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus..
.Help
Needed..
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU>
04/09/01 04:53 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
I am trying to execute svmon but , getting following error ..any idea ?
medrs2:ps -aef | grep dsmserv
root 42134 1 0 Apr 02 - 2474:14 dsmserv
root 48518 47810 1 16:36:56 pts/10 0:00 grep dsmserv
medrs2:sh /usr/bin/svmon -P 42134
sh: /usr/bin/svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied.
medrs2:id
uid=0(root) gid=0(system)
groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit)
medrs2:
medrs2:svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:/usr/bin/svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:cd /usr/bin
medrs2:./svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:sh svmon
sh: svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied.
medrs2:echo $PATH
/usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin
Thanks
shekhar ..
George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/09/2001 03:19:45 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Herve, Where am going wrong here???
# ps -aef | grep dsmserv
root 30300 34772 0 Apr 07 - 606:00 dsmserv quiet
# svmon -P 30300
Pid Command Inuse Pin Pgspace
64-bit
30300*** process does not exist ***
Drop me a note off line and help me out... I am not sure why it is coming
back
and
saying that my TSM server is not running thanks-
George Lesho
Storage/System Admin
AFC Enterprises
"Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/06/2001 10:23:05 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Hi Richard,
to know exactly how many RAM TSM is eating, try the following :
% ps -eaf | grep dsmserv --> GET PID
% svmon -P
--- physical RAM pages (4Ko) ---+
v
Pid CommandInusePin Pgspace
11638 dsmserv.4255741 1637293
|
Pid: 11638+> 217 MB
Command: dsmserv.42
Segid Type Description InusePin Pgspace Address Range
1ba6 pers /dev/hd3:93 0 00 0..0
7a1 pers /dev/hd3:88 0 00 0..0
...
Hope this helps
rv
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dearman, R
Re: Autosys and ADSM???
I am using Tivoli`s Meaestro schedular .. installed on AIX 4.3.3. works very well . Shekhar Dhotre Bayer Corp. Jaime Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/12/2001 11:43:02 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Autosys and ADSM??? We currently have Autosys scheduling a series of ADSM backups or Oracle databases as well as numerous batch jobs all of which are running on AIX client mahines on an SP system. The Autosys server currently resides on a seperate NT server. Management wants to migrate the Autosys server to an AIX platform. The instability of the NT platform has prompted us to consider this migration to AIX. However, considering the level of support we have received from Computer Associates, or lack of regarding their Autosys product, in fixing our Autosys/ADSM problems, as well as the fact that we will upgrade our ADSM system to the latest version of TSM, we are seriously considering another scheduler. Does anybody have this kind of AIX / ADSM / AUTOSYS setup? Any ideas or successes? Jaime Diaz SP2 Administrator House2Home Support Services, MIS 949-442-5725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] $RFC822.eml
Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
I installed ML08 on AIX 4.3.3 .0 today
and issued command
# oslevel
4.3.2.0
# instfix -ik 4330-08_AIX_ML
All filesets for 4330-08_AIX_ML were found.
# instfix -ciqk 4330-08_AIX_ML | grep ":-:"
is this ok ---4.3.2.0 ?
Shekhar Dhotre
UniX /Tivoli Admin .
Bayer Corp.
508-520-7821 .
Shawn Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/10/2001 08:46:03 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Update your perfagent.tools to 2.2.33.50. svmon was broken in the previous
few releases.
--
Shawn Raymond
Sr. Technical Consultant
Synergy, Inc.
518-782-3457
Shekhar
DhotreTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help
Needed..
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU>
04/09/01 04:53 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
I am trying to execute svmon but , getting following error ..any idea ?
medrs2:ps -aef | grep dsmserv
root 42134 1 0 Apr 02 - 2474:14 dsmserv
root 48518 47810 1 16:36:56 pts/10 0:00 grep dsmserv
medrs2:sh /usr/bin/svmon -P 42134
sh: /usr/bin/svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied.
medrs2:id
uid=0(root) gid=0(system)
groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit)
medrs2:
medrs2:svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:/usr/bin/svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:cd /usr/bin
medrs2:./svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:sh svmon
sh: svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied.
medrs2:echo $PATH
/usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin
Thanks
shekhar ..
George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/09/2001 03:19:45 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Herve, Where am going wrong here???
# ps -aef | grep dsmserv
root 30300 34772 0 Apr 07 - 606:00 dsmserv quiet
# svmon -P 30300
Pid Command Inuse Pin Pgspace
64-bit
30300*** process does not exist ***
Drop me a note off line and help me out... I am not sure why it is coming
back
and
saying that my TSM server is not running thanks-
George Lesho
Storage/System Admin
AFC Enterprises
"Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/06/2001 10:23:05 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Hi Richard,
to know exactly how many RAM TSM is eating, try the following :
% ps -eaf | grep dsmserv --> GET PID
% svmon -P
--- physical RAM pages (4Ko) ---+
v
Pid CommandInusePin Pgspace
11638 dsmserv.4255741 1637293
|
Pid: 11638+> 217 MB
Command: dsmserv.42
Segid Type Description InusePin Pgspace Address Range
1ba6 pers /dev/hd3:93 0 00 0..0
7a1 pers /dev/hd3:88 0 00 0..0
...
Hope this helps
rv
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoy
é : vendredi 6 avril 2001 17:17
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
>
>
> I use the "top"utility to monitor my server adsm server load.
> I noticed
> that the Real memory statement is showing 812M files is being
> used. What
> does the files statement mean? it seems whatever files means
> is taking up
> all of my memory.
>
> Load averages: 0.10, 0.04, 0.04 adsmsrv1Fri
> Apr 6 10:15:50
> 2001
> Cpu states: 0.7% user 3.5% system 7.8% wait 88.0% idle For
> non-commercial
> Logged on: 1 users 1 active 1 remote 00:10 sleep time
> use only
> !!!
> Real memory: 211.6M procs 812.0M files0.5M free 1024.0M total
> Virtual memory: 137.6M used 3574.4M free 3712.0M total
>
>
>
> ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER**
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be
> confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
>
Re: TSM client on HP-UX
Thanks Andy that worked .. # tar -xvf IP21930.tar x README, 24489 bytes, 48 tape blocks x README.API, 17988 bytes, 36 tape blocks x README.OLD, 24965 bytes, 49 tape blocks x README.WEBCLI, 10492 bytes, 21 tape blocks x TIVsm, 42045440 bytes, 82120 tape blocks x TIVsm64, 3522560 bytes, 6880 tape blocks root@dimdu11 [/install] # date Tue Apr 10 18:06:07 EDT 2001 root@dimdu11 [/install] Shekhar Dhotre Unix/Tivoli Admin BAyer Corp. # Andy Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/10/2001 04:52:37 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: TSM client on HP-UX I'm not sure what the problem is. I just downloaded the file (it's IP21930.tar.Z, not IP21930.tar), and used tar to unzip/untar the file: tar -z -xvf IP21930.tar.Z I did this on a Windows system using GNU tar, so I do not see why this would not work on HP-UX. IP21930.tar.Z is 20,362,089 bytes. The tar command extracted these files: README - 24,489 bytes README.API - 17,988 bytes README.OLD - 24,965 bytes README.WEBCLI - 10,492 bytes TIVsm - 42,045,440 bytes TIVsm64 - 3,522,560 bytes If I decompress the file using gzip (before running tar), the resulting IP21930.tar file is 45,660,160 bytes. You might check your .Z and/or .tar files against the sizes I provided above. Maybe you need to try downloading the file again. Also, see if you have enough disk space to do the extract. Lastly, I pulled the file down from the primary site, ftp.software.ibm.com. If you got it from a mirror site, maybe there is a problem with the copy on the mirror. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Tivoli Systems Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked." -Original Message- From: Shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 10 April, 2001 1:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM client on HP-UX Hi all , trying to install TSM clinet on HP-UX , but unable to extract the tar file . downloded from tivoli web site today. solaris , AIX tar files works fine ..any idea ? root@dimdu11 [/install] # ls IP21930.tar README.API TIVsm Maestro_License README.OLD lost+found README README.WEBCLIperl5.tar root@dimdu11 [/install] # tar -xvf IP21930.tar x README, 24489 bytes, 48 tape blocks x README.API, 17988 bytes, 36 tape blocks x README.OLD, 24965 bytes, 49 tape blocks x README.WEBCLI, 10492 bytes, 21 tape blocks x TIVsm, 42045440 bytes, 82120 tape blocks Tar: error! blocksize changed root@dimdu11 [/install] # uname -r B.10.20 root@dimdu11 [/install] Shekhar Dhotre AIX Certified Specilaist Sun certified Admin for solaris 7 MCSE $RFC822.eml
Re: Error in Backupset Expiration
Hi all , trying to install TSM clinet on HP-UX , but unable to extract the tar file . downloded from tivoli web site today. solaris , AIX tar files works fine ..any idea ? root@dimdu11 [/install] # ls IP21930.tar README.API TIVsm Maestro_License README.OLD lost+found README README.WEBCLIperl5.tar root@dimdu11 [/install] # tar -xvf IP21930.tar x README, 24489 bytes, 48 tape blocks x README.API, 17988 bytes, 36 tape blocks x README.OLD, 24965 bytes, 49 tape blocks x README.WEBCLI, 10492 bytes, 21 tape blocks x TIVsm, 42045440 bytes, 82120 tape blocks Tar: error! blocksize changed root@dimdu11 [/install] # uname -r B.10.20 root@dimdu11 [/install] Shekhar Dhotre AIX Certified Specilaist Sun certified Admin for solaris 7 MCSE . #
TSM client on HP-UX
Hi all , trying to install TSM clinet on HP-UX , but unable to extract the tar file . downloded from tivoli web site today. solaris , AIX tar files works fine ..any idea ? root@dimdu11 [/install] # ls IP21930.tar README.API TIVsm Maestro_License README.OLD lost+found README README.WEBCLIperl5.tar root@dimdu11 [/install] # tar -xvf IP21930.tar x README, 24489 bytes, 48 tape blocks x README.API, 17988 bytes, 36 tape blocks x README.OLD, 24965 bytes, 49 tape blocks x README.WEBCLI, 10492 bytes, 21 tape blocks x TIVsm, 42045440 bytes, 82120 tape blocks Tar: error! blocksize changed root@dimdu11 [/install] # uname -r B.10.20 root@dimdu11 [/install] Shekhar Dhotre AIX Certified Specilaist Sun certified Admin for solaris 7 MCSE .
Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
I will be getting ML-8 for AIX tomorow , So i have to wait till tomorow ..
Shekhar.
Shawn Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/10/2001 08:46:03 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Update your perfagent.tools to 2.2.33.50. svmon was broken in the previous
few releases.
--
Shawn Raymond
Sr. Technical Consultant
Synergy, Inc.
518-782-3457
Shekhar
DhotreTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help
Needed..
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU>
04/09/01 04:53 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
I am trying to execute svmon but , getting following error ..any idea ?
medrs2:ps -aef | grep dsmserv
root 42134 1 0 Apr 02 - 2474:14 dsmserv
root 48518 47810 1 16:36:56 pts/10 0:00 grep dsmserv
medrs2:sh /usr/bin/svmon -P 42134
sh: /usr/bin/svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied.
medrs2:id
uid=0(root) gid=0(system)
groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit)
medrs2:
medrs2:svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:/usr/bin/svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:cd /usr/bin
medrs2:./svmon
open: No such file or directory
medrs2:sh svmon
sh: svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied.
medrs2:echo $PATH
/usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin
Thanks
shekhar ..
George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/09/2001 03:19:45 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Herve, Where am going wrong here???
# ps -aef | grep dsmserv
root 30300 34772 0 Apr 07 - 606:00 dsmserv quiet
# svmon -P 30300
Pid Command Inuse Pin Pgspace
64-bit
30300*** process does not exist ***
Drop me a note off line and help me out... I am not sure why it is coming
back
and
saying that my TSM server is not running thanks-
George Lesho
Storage/System Admin
AFC Enterprises
"Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/06/2001 10:23:05 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Hi Richard,
to know exactly how many RAM TSM is eating, try the following :
% ps -eaf | grep dsmserv --> GET PID
% svmon -P
--- physical RAM pages (4Ko) ---+
v
Pid CommandInusePin Pgspace
11638 dsmserv.4255741 1637293
|
Pid: 11638+> 217 MB
Command: dsmserv.42
Segid Type Description InusePin Pgspace Address Range
1ba6 pers /dev/hd3:93 0 00 0..0
7a1 pers /dev/hd3:88 0 00 0..0
...
Hope this helps
rv
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoy
é : vendredi 6 avril 2001 17:17
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
>
>
> I use the "top"utility to monitor my server adsm server load.
> I noticed
> that the Real memory statement is showing 812M files is being
> used. What
> does the files statement mean? it seems whatever files means
> is taking up
> all of my memory.
>
> Load averages: 0.10, 0.04, 0.04 adsmsrv1Fri
> Apr 6 10:15:50
> 2001
> Cpu states: 0.7% user 3.5% system 7.8% wait 88.0% idle For
> non-commercial
> Logged on: 1 users 1 active 1 remote 00:10 sleep time
> use only
> !!!
> Real memory: 211.6M procs 812.0M files0.5M free 1024.0M total
> Virtual memory: 137.6M used 3574.4M free 3712.0M total
>
>
>
> ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER**
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be
> confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
> whom they are
> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual
> responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or any
Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
medrs2:sar 2 10 AIX medrs2 3 4 000172144C0004/10/01 09:37:10%usr%sys%wio %idle 09:37:12 24 4 5 68 09:37:14 0 0 1 98 09:37:16 0 0 0 100 09:37:18 0 0 0 100 09:37:20 0 1 0 99 09:37:22 0 1 0 99 09:37:24 0 0 0 100 09:37:26 1 0 0 99 09:37:28 0 0 0 100 09:37:30 0 0 0 100 Average3 1 1 96 medrs2:ulimit unlimited Hervé CHIBOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/09/2001 05:07:03 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. Hi Shekhar, Have you installed SAR and IOSTAT ? SAR like SVMON needs to write in a particular directory, which must exists before launching the command If yes, test if you can run them without any permission pb; root # sar 2 10 Haven't you reached your Ulimit ? I will check this tomorrow, keep on searching. rv - Original Message - From: "Shekhar Dhotre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 10:53 PM Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. I am trying to execute svmon but , getting following error ..any idea ? medrs2:ps -aef | grep dsmserv root 42134 1 0 Apr 02 - 2474:14 dsmserv root 48518 47810 1 16:36:56 pts/10 0:00 grep dsmserv medrs2:sh /usr/bin/svmon -P 42134 sh: /usr/bin/svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied. medrs2:id uid=0(root) gid=0(system) groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit) medrs2: medrs2:svmon open: No such file or directory medrs2:/usr/bin/svmon open: No such file or directory medrs2:cd /usr/bin medrs2:./svmon open: No such file or directory medrs2:sh svmon sh: svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied. medrs2:echo $PATH /usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin Thanks shekhar .. George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/09/2001 03:19:45 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. Herve, Where am going wrong here??? # ps -aef | grep dsmserv root 30300 34772 0 Apr 07 - 606:00 dsmserv quiet # svmon -P 30300 Pid Command Inuse Pin Pgspace 64-bit 30300*** process does not exist *** Drop me a note off line and help me out... I am not sure why it is coming back and saying that my TSM server is not running thanks- George Lesho Storage/System Admin AFC Enterprises "Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/06/2001 10:23:05 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC) Fax to: Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. Hi Richard, to know exactly how many RAM TSM is eating, try the following : % ps -eaf | grep dsmserv --> GET PID % svmon -P --- physical RAM pages (4Ko) ---+ v Pid CommandInusePin Pgspace 11638 dsmserv.4255741 1637293 | Pid: 11638+> 217 MB Command: dsmserv.42 Segid Type Description InusePin Pgspace Address Range 1ba6 pers /dev/hd3:93 0 00 0..0 7a1 pers /dev/hd3:88 0 00 0..0 ... Hope this helps rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoy é : vendredi 6 avril 2001 17:17 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > I use the "top"utility to monitor my server adsm server load. > I noticed > that the Real memory statement is showing 812M files is being > used. What > does the files statement mean? it seems whatever files means > is taking up > all of my memory. > > Load averages: 0.10, 0.04, 0.04 adsmsrv1Fri > Apr 6 10:15:50 > 2001 > Cpu states: 0.7% user 3.5% system 7.8% wait 88.0% idle For > non-commercial > Logged on: 1 users 1 active 1 remote 00:10 sleep time > use only > !!! > Real memory: 211.6M procs 812.0M files0.5M free 1024.0M total > Virtual memory: 137.6M used 3574.4M free 3712.0M total > > > > ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER** > This e-mail an
Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
medrs2:ls -l /usr/bin/svmon -r-x-- 1 root system 7318 Aug 05 1999 /usr/bin/svmon medrs2:file /usr/bin/svmon /usr/bin/svmon: executable (RISC System/6000) or object module Suad Musovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/10/2001 02:24:45 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. can you do a "ls -l /usr/bin/svmon" and "file /usr/bin/svmon"? Cheers, Suad -- > I am trying to execute svmon but , getting following error ..any idea ? > > medrs2:ps -aef | grep dsmserv > root 42134 1 0 Apr 02 - 2474:14 dsmserv > root 48518 47810 1 16:36:56 pts/10 0:00 grep dsmserv > > > medrs2:sh /usr/bin/svmon -P 42134 > sh: /usr/bin/svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied. > > medrs2:id > uid=0(root) gid=0(system) groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit) > medrs2: > > > medrs2:svmon > open: No such file or directory > > medrs2:/usr/bin/svmon > open: No such file or directory > > medrs2:cd /usr/bin > > medrs2:./svmon > open: No such file or directory > > medrs2:sh svmon > sh: svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied. > > medrs2:echo $PATH > /usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin > > Thanks > shekhar .. > > > > > George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/09/2001 03:19:45 PM > > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > > Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > Herve, Where am going wrong here??? > > # ps -aef | grep dsmserv > root 30300 34772 0 Apr 07 - 606:00 dsmserv quiet > # svmon -P 30300 > > Pid Command Inuse Pin Pgspace 64-bit > 30300*** process does not exist *** > > Drop me a note off line and help me out... I am not sure why it is coming back > and > saying that my TSM server is not running thanks- > > George Lesho > Storage/System Admin > AFC Enterprises > > > > > > > > "Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/06/2001 10:23:05 AM > > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC) > Fax to: > Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > > Hi Richard, > > to know exactly how many RAM TSM is eating, try the following : > > % ps -eaf | grep dsmserv --> GET PID > % svmon -P > >--- physical RAM pages (4Ko) ---+ >v > Pid CommandInusePin Pgspace > 11638 dsmserv.4255741 1637293 >| > Pid: 11638+> 217 MB > Command: dsmserv.42 > > Segid Type Description InusePin Pgspace Address Range > 1ba6 pers /dev/hd3:93 0 00 0..0 > 7a1 pers /dev/hd3:88 0 00 0..0 > ... > > Hope this helps > rv > > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Envoy > > é : vendredi 6 avril 2001 17:17 > > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Objet : AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > > > > I use the "top"utility to monitor my server adsm server load. > > I noticed > > that the Real memory statement is showing 812M files is being > > used. What > > does the files statement mean? it seems whatever files means > > is taking up > > all of my memory. > > > > Load averages: 0.10, 0.04, 0.04 adsmsrv1Fri > > Apr 6 10:15:50 > > 2001 > > Cpu states: 0.7% user 3.5% system 7.8% wait 88.0% idle For > > non-commercial > > Logged on: 1 users 1 active 1 remote 00:10 sleep time > > use only > > !!! > > Real memory: 211.6M procs 812.0M files0.5M free 1024.0M total > > Virtual memory: 137.6M used 3574.4M free 3712.0M total > > > > > > > > ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER** > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be > > confidential and are > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > > whom they are > > addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual > > responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, any > > disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or > > omitted to be taken > > in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this e-mail > > in error, please delete it and notify the sender or contact Health > > Information Management (312) 996-3941. > > > > > > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?$RFC822.eml?=
Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
I am trying to execute svmon but , getting following error ..any idea ? medrs2:ps -aef | grep dsmserv root 42134 1 0 Apr 02 - 2474:14 dsmserv root 48518 47810 1 16:36:56 pts/10 0:00 grep dsmserv medrs2:sh /usr/bin/svmon -P 42134 sh: /usr/bin/svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied. medrs2:id uid=0(root) gid=0(system) groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit) medrs2: medrs2:svmon open: No such file or directory medrs2:/usr/bin/svmon open: No such file or directory medrs2:cd /usr/bin medrs2:./svmon open: No such file or directory medrs2:sh svmon sh: svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied. medrs2:echo $PATH /usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin Thanks shekhar .. George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/09/2001 03:19:45 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. Herve, Where am going wrong here??? # ps -aef | grep dsmserv root 30300 34772 0 Apr 07 - 606:00 dsmserv quiet # svmon -P 30300 Pid Command Inuse Pin Pgspace 64-bit 30300*** process does not exist *** Drop me a note off line and help me out... I am not sure why it is coming back and saying that my TSM server is not running thanks- George Lesho Storage/System Admin AFC Enterprises "Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/06/2001 10:23:05 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC) Fax to: Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. Hi Richard, to know exactly how many RAM TSM is eating, try the following : % ps -eaf | grep dsmserv --> GET PID % svmon -P --- physical RAM pages (4Ko) ---+ v Pid CommandInusePin Pgspace 11638 dsmserv.4255741 1637293 | Pid: 11638+> 217 MB Command: dsmserv.42 Segid Type Description InusePin Pgspace Address Range 1ba6 pers /dev/hd3:93 0 00 0..0 7a1 pers /dev/hd3:88 0 00 0..0 ... Hope this helps rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoy é : vendredi 6 avril 2001 17:17 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > I use the "top"utility to monitor my server adsm server load. > I noticed > that the Real memory statement is showing 812M files is being > used. What > does the files statement mean? it seems whatever files means > is taking up > all of my memory. > > Load averages: 0.10, 0.04, 0.04 adsmsrv1Fri > Apr 6 10:15:50 > 2001 > Cpu states: 0.7% user 3.5% system 7.8% wait 88.0% idle For > non-commercial > Logged on: 1 users 1 active 1 remote 00:10 sleep time > use only > !!! > Real memory: 211.6M procs 812.0M files0.5M free 1024.0M total > Virtual memory: 137.6M used 3574.4M free 3712.0M total > > > > ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER** > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be > confidential and are > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they are > addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual > responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, any > disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or > omitted to be taken > in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this e-mail > in error, please delete it and notify the sender or contact Health > Information Management (312) 996-3941. > =?iso-8859-1?Q?$RFC822.eml?=
Re: TSM 4.1 Certification
check Archives .. /adsm.org .you will find threads on this topic ..Disscused in the past. shekhar Cody Cauchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/30/2001 12:42:58 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: TSM 4.1 Certification Hi Guys and Gals. I have been working with TSM and various other related products for over 2 years and am thinking of getting certified. Does anyone have any tips that would help me do this. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Cody Cauchi, Systems Programmer, ITS University of Windsor 401 Sunset Avenue Windsor, Ontario Phone - 253-3000 x4435 $RFC822.eml
Re: ANR2121W Server is NOT IN Compliance with license terms
you have registered more no. of clients , than you have license , but those clients are not in use . do # q lic and check output .. shekhar . Praveen Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/30/2001 06:06:33 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: ANR2121W Server is NOT IN Compliance with license terms Hi all, I am getting the below message in TSM Server. "ANR2121W Server is NOT IN Compliance with license terms" But my backup is going through as usual. Please guide me how to solve the above problem. Regards Praveen _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. $RFC822.eml
Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
once you open and close door , Robot should scan each and every slot and drives in the library. go to /usr/tivoli/tsm/devices/binand run lbtest . also kill and and restart acs_ssi (ACSLS daemons _ from AIX , reboot ACSLS . i do following stop TSM stop ACSLS IPL library . reboot ACSLS server start TSM start ACSLS daemons . this should solve your problem , therwise i will call STK engg. reagards Shekhar Dhotre Bayer Corp. David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/28/2001 03:56:51 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful I haven't worked on your STK 9740. I have worked some on a STK 9710. When you say it did the audit after you closed the door, do you mean the robot scanned ALL the tapes slots. If it didn't then check your OP Manual for the 9740 and see what you need to do to do a full inventory/audit or whatever they call it. After this completes and the STK is back online, then run TSM audit once and if an error then a 2nd time. If you've done all this and the error still exists, then you have a more difficult problem. Do you have a utility on your TSM server to directly access the STK 9740 aside from TSM? If so use it to see what library thinks is in slot 210 and work from there. David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5525 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/01 02:38PM >>> funny thing happened... I opened the library and closed it. This caused a StorageTek audit. Then I went to TSM and ran audit library tekwolf checklabel=barcode. I ran over to the StorageTek and watched. The Robot went to the bottom DRIVE and scanned. It then moved up a DRIVE and searched again. It did this twice more (I have 4 drives which were empty at the time). At the end of this is when I received the I/O error. All the robot did was go to the 4 drives. Shouldn't it have went to slot 210 and looked for the tape? Any way -- I have to find a way to delete the slot 210 contents from the storagetek memory. Any ideas? - Forwarded by Marc D Levitan/PFPC/WES/PNC on 03/28/2001 02:33 PM - Marc D Levitan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/2001 cc: 02:21 PM Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful(Document link: Marc D Levitan) Hi George, Is there a way to clear that ram and have the storage library re-audit the library? I am asking because my problem is that there is NO volume in slot 210. (The Library thinks there is) However, when I try an audit through TSM, it errors out on slot 210. I was able to checkout other volumes in other slots because TSM associated a volume number to the slot. In this case though, TSM does not "see" any volumes in slot 210. [EMAIL PROTECTED] om To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/2001 Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful 02:13 PM David, You made a comment that barcode problems would show up in an error log... not so. I have first hand experience here. I have lost my barcode reader twice in the last year from my 3575L32. Mine is configured as yours is; 2/14 and as one library. The first time the barcode reader stopped working, it was actually the card at the back of the library (RAM) where the element status info is held. The second time was the reader itself. Both times, the LED blinked and appeared to be functioning. Neither error was reported into the errpt. I only noticed the problem because of the audit library problem of not being able to go through the whole library reading labels before bombing. The problem with the card not retaining the element info was very hard for the IBM hardware CE to diagnose as it doesn't show up using the normal diag or library diagnostic routines. Marc's problem won't be resolved for the tape in his slot 210. The library barcode reader CAN'T read the barcode and the tape can't be mounted to read the label. Marc's error message indicates: Illegal request - incompatible medium installed KEY 15SC 30 ASC 00 This means the tape format or medium itself is bad (this info from the SCSI Bench Reference) He needs to get the tape out of the library, check it back in, move data and then he could choose to audit the volume with the fix swtich invoked or just delete the volume and can it... Could another application have written to the tape? Could Marc have done dd
Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
Here it works : ACSLS 5.3 ,# oslevel 4.3.1.0 TSM3.7.4 tsm: TSM>audit library stk9710 checklabel=barcode ANS8003I Process number 73 started. 03/27/01 12:08:08 ANR0985I Process 73 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state SUCCESS at 12:08:08. George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/27/2001 12:16:06 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful I have had this problem with AIX 4.3.2 / TSM 3.7.3.6 using a 3575L32. I have an open PMR with Tivoli and have sent them traces and there has been no resolution. I get around this by having the library check its elements (do an inventory) and then do an inventory where the TSM application receives the element information from the library as opposed to reading the labels. Even this hangs about 1/2 the time and I need to cancel the audit process and do it again. The audit should also be done when the system is quiet. I get similar errors to the ones you are reporting below and feel that while Tivoli should fix the problem, I can work around it by entering the following: audit library checklabel=barcode George Lesho Storage/System Admin AFC Enterprises Marc Levitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/27/2001 09:53:01 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC) Fax to: Subject: Audit Library Unsuccessful Hi All- I am unable to successfully Audit our StorageTek Library. (Audit Library libraryname) The Audit gets to about 3/4 done when I receive an I/O Error: 03/27/01 10:08:07 ANR8300E I/O error on library TEKWOLF (OP=6C03, CC=301, KEY=05, ASC=30, ASCQ=00, SENSE=70.00.05.00.00.00- .00.0C.00.00.00.00.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00., Description- =Cartridge load failure). Refer to Appendix B in the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. and here is the errpt on the AIX TSM server. 5680E405 0327100801 P H lb0STORAGE SUBSYSTEM FAILURE 5680E405 0327100801 P H lb0STORAGE SUBSYSTEM FAILURE I am at AIX 4.3.3, TSM 3.7.4 StorageTek 9740 with 4 Drives 9840 It always stops on a different tape. I have exported several tapes and retried the audit several times. Always same result. I had the StorageTek Service come in and check the library, and it checked out ok. I find it hard to believe that all of a sudden all of the tapes in the library are bad! Has anyone experienced this? Any recommended next steps??? Marc Levitan Senior LAN Engineer PFPC Global Fund Services 508 871-4459 $RFC822.eml
Re: Disaster Happened!
Don`t you have mksysb of that node ? David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/22/2001 02:08:39 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Disaster Happened! I'll try to make this brief. Last night we were doing upgrades on some of our systems, most notably and RS6000 SP Node running AIX 4.3.3. During OS maintenance level update we lost connectivity from Control W/S with CDROM to the Client SP NOde - It went downhill from there! WE shortly couldn't even getb into the Node even from TTY. With great effort from IBM support we got in and got the NOde back in config but no way to get back where we were. Had to reload a new image on the node and then we loaded the TSM 4.1.0.0 client. (The node originally had 3.1.0.6 client with API interfacing to ORacle's EBU for Oracle 7.3.4 database _ Peoplesoft App.) DB's are on Extrenal IBM ESS so shouild be o.k. We have restored /usr, now restoring /var and will go to /home and then /. Looks good so far. We have never restored a complete AIX system from ADSM and certainlyu not an SP NODE. I just got back in from 3 hours sleep while another guy got us this far. I plan to call Tivoli, but wanted to check with anybody that has done this or similar with AIX. And anybody that also has SP experience would be helpful. Are we going down wrong path? What are gotcha's? What about SP issues? Default assumption is after we resotre these rootvg filesystems, we can reboot and everybody will live happily everafter?!?!?! We will not reboot until I can get some good feeling that it will come up as we may not be able to get back in. I know this may not make good sense as I'm not 10% today but that's why we are checking with others. I will also try to get "DR restore manual" from onluine at Tivle/IBM also. (We are alsio restoring a 30+ GB Novell volume - gues how long that will ytake!!) THanks in advance for any helpful comments. I will post our "Final Answer" when it's all back up! David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5525 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "MMS " made the following annotations on 03/22/01 14:14:48 -- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. === $RFC822.eml
Re: What's wrong here
my question , why you are configuring 8mm in TSM .. and why to take backup on 8mm.? Arshad Sheikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/21/2001 02:31:19 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: What's wrong here Thanks for the reply. But since its just a 8mm 5GB tape drive and not a library so I think I can't have any scratch volume, here is what I have got when I try to label a tape tsm: TSM>label libvolume lib8mm tape01 checkin=scratch overwrite=yes ANR8494E LABEL LIBVOLUME: An option specified is not valid for MANUAL libraries. ANS8001I Return code 3. okay next I tried the same command without checkin=scratch statment and it worked. tsm: TSM>label libvolume lib8mm tape01 overwrite=yes ANS8003I Process number 8 started. tsm: TSM>q proc Process Process Description Status Number 8 LABEL LIBVOLUME ANR8804I Labelling volume TAPE01 in library LIB8MM. tsm: TSM>q actlog begint=now-0:01 Date/TimeMessage - 03/21/01 11:29:16 ANR8372I 002: Remove 8MM volume TAPE01 from drive DRV8MM (/dev/mt0) of library LIB8MM. 03/21/01 11:29:16 ANR8800I LABEL LIBVOLUME for volume TAPE01 in library LIB8MM completed successfully. 03/21/01 11:29:16 ANR0985I Process 8 for LABEL LIBVOLUME running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state SUCCESS at 11:29:16. Its a single tape drive attached to the system. How can I define scratch volume for it. In stgpool I put maxscratch parameter as 10. Arshad >From: George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: What's wrong here >Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:06:11 -0600 > >Arshad, It would seem that there are not scratch volumes available for use >as a >db backup tape. Try the following select at your dsmadmc prompt to >identify how >many scratch tapes are in your library: > >select count(*) as num_scratch_tapes from libvolumes where status='Scratch' > >George Lesho >Storage/System Admin >AFC Enterprises > > > > > >Arshad Sheikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/21/2001 11:32:14 AM > >Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC) >Fax to: >Subject: What's wrong here > > > >Hi there, > >I am a newbie so forgive my naiveness. I want to setup TSM 3.7 on a box >with >8mm drive, so I create a library, drive,devclass,stgpool and label my >volume. I also created the domain,policyset,mgmtclass and copypool for >backing up files and register the node in it. >Now when I tried to do a db backup > >backup db devclass=c8mm type=full > >I got the following from actlog > >03/21/01 09:10:51 ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: BACKUP DB > devclass=class8mm type=full >03/21/01 09:10:51 ANR0984I Process 6 for DATABASE BACKUP started in the > BACKGROUND at 09:10:51. >03/21/01 09:10:51 ANR2280I Full database backup started as process 6. >03/21/01 09:10:51 ANR8447E No drives are currently available in library > LIB8MM. >03/21/01 09:10:51 ANR1404W Scratch volume mount request denied - mount > failed. >03/21/01 09:10:51 ANR4578E Database backup/restore terminated - required > volume was not mounted. >03/21/01 09:10:51 ANR0985I Process 6 for DATABASE BACKUP running in the > BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE >at > 09:10:51. > > >What I need to do to make it work, I already labeled the volume, its >already >inserted in the drive. What is wrong here?? Checkin volume command only >works with automated libraries so I can't check in the volume. > >Any help is deeply appreciated. > >Arshad. >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com $RFC822.eml
Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade
3.7.2 to 3.7.4 .. End of the thread . "Walker, Lesley R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/20/2001 09:50:40 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade >Shekhar Dhotre wrote: >>I have experienced this before , upgrade deletes all drive >>info , and if you >>try to reconfigure it , using smit tivoli ..you can`t you have to >>1) delete drives from ODM use odmdelete .. (#rmdev -dl >>rmtx --does not work) and Geoff Gill wrote: >I upgraded from 3.1 to 4.1 a month ago and did not have to do anything >with drives. My system upgrade went very smooth, all devices that were >there before the upgrade were there after it. I think there are two different situations here. Mark and Geoff (and I think others) wrote that they did not have this problem going from one major version to another (eg 3.7.x to 4.1.x) - whereas Wanda said "We just did a 3.7.2 to 3.7.4 upgrade..." and had the problem. Looks to me like the problem could be with 3.7.4 specifically. Shekhar, what version did you upgrade to that caused the problem? (not that it matters to me, I'm on Solaris - I just hate to see people arguing) $RFC822.eml
Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade
Are you reading this Mark ? This is true and true.. Shekhar DHotre. "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/19/2001 10:21:48 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade Is true. We just did a 3.7.2 to 3.7.4 upgrade, AIX 4.3.3. Something has changed in Tivoli's install script, and the device type changes from "tape" to "ADSMtape", so that you have to delete the drives and add them back, but rmdev -dl doesn't work, you have to use odmdelete. I've also done 2.x to 3.x, 3.1.x to 3.7.x, and it's the first time I've run into this. But nevertheless, it's true. -Original Message- From: Mark S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 10:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade Shekhar Dhotre wrote: >I have experienced this before , upgrade deletes all drive info , and if you >try to reconfigure it , using smit tivoli ..you can`t you have to >1) delete drives from ODM use odmdelete .. (#rmdev -dl rmtx --does not work) Not true. I've upgraded from 2.x to 3.x, 3.1.x to 3.7.x, and 3.x to 4.1.x, and I've never seen an instance where 'rmdev -dl rmtX doesn't work. Trim your reply tree, Shekhar. It's much too long. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) $RFC822.eml
Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade
I have faced this problem here in my shop , and myself and level 2 support from Tivoli resolved this problem using odmdelete command and you are saying not true . further ODMDELETE also needs specific combination ,otherwise it won`t work. here are the command which i used for mtx , and rmtx .. medrs2:id uid=0(root) gid=0(system) groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit) medrs2:odmdelete -o CuDv -q name=mt0 0518-307 odmdelete: 1 objects deleted. medrs2:set -o vi medrs2:odmdelete -o CuDv -q name=mt1 0518-307 odmdelete: 1 objects deleted. Shekhar Dhotre IBM certified AIX Specialist Sun Solaris Certified for Solaris 7 MCSE Tivoli Certified Consultant 4.1 (2000) "Mark S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/18/2001 10:51:00 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade Shekhar Dhotre wrote: >I have experienced this before , upgrade deletes all drive info , and if you >try to reconfigure it , using smit tivoli ..you can`t you have to >1) delete drives from ODM use odmdelete .. (#rmdev -dl rmtx --does not work) Not true. I've upgraded from 2.x to 3.x, 3.1.x to 3.7.x, and 3.x to 4.1.x, and I've never seen an instance where 'rmdev -dl rmtX doesn't work. Trim your reply tree, Shekhar. It's much too long. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) $RFC822.eml
Re: ADSM Ship survived !!
change company :-) "Ghanekar, Prasanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/15/2001 03:56:10 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ADSM Ship survived !! Shekhar, You are absolutely correct But I'm in desperate need of Vitamin M. If you can take care of it then I'm all for it. Prasanna -Original Message- From: Shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 3:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ADSM Ship survived !! Prassana , Don't you think this is not time to reinstall adsm , and you should be at TSM 4.1.x.x :-) Regards Shekhar Dhotre . Sr. Sys Admin Bayer Corporation (Diag Division ) MA-02052. "Ghanekar, Prasanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/15/2001 03:04:37 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: ADSM Ship survived !! Everyone, Thank you so much for Helping me get the ADSM server back to life. I had to re-install the server with v 3.1.2.90. Everything runs OK except the central scheduler which is configured to run as a service. After a while, it gives me Dr. Watson error and stops, server continues to work. But, this will stop me from doing any client schedules. Is this PTF stable ? Does anyone have one of the older ptf's i.e. v3.1.2.40 / 50, Please let me know. Once again, I thank you for your kind attention to my problem and before I end, I would like to thank my best friend and ADSM Guru, Rajesh Oak from San Jose for his continued 24 x 7 offsite support. Regards, Prasanna Prasanna Ghanekar <<...OLE_Obj...>> EDS Pontiac East 2100 S Opdyke Rd MI 48341 *: (248) 972-4547 $RFC822.eml
Re: ADSM Ship survived !!
Prassana , Don't you think this is not time to reinstall adsm , and you should be at TSM 4.1.x.x :-) Regards Shekhar Dhotre . Sr. Sys Admin Bayer Corporation (Diag Division ) MA-02052. "Ghanekar, Prasanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/15/2001 03:04:37 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: ADSM Ship survived !! Everyone, Thank you so much for Helping me get the ADSM server back to life. I had to re-install the server with v 3.1.2.90. Everything runs OK except the central scheduler which is configured to run as a service. After a while, it gives me Dr. Watson error and stops, server continues to work. But, this will stop me from doing any client schedules. Is this PTF stable ? Does anyone have one of the older ptf's i.e. v3.1.2.40 / 50, Please let me know. Once again, I thank you for your kind attention to my problem and before I end, I would like to thank my best friend and ADSM Guru, Rajesh Oak from San Jose for his continued 24 x 7 offsite support. Regards, Prasanna Prasanna Ghanekar <<...OLE_Obj...>> EDS Pontiac East 2100 S Opdyke Rd MI 48341 *: (248) 972-4547 =?iso-8859-1?Q?$RFC822.eml?=
Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade
I have experienced this before , upgrade deletes all drive info , and if you
try to reconfigure it ,
using smit tivoli ..you can`t
you have to
1) delete drives from ODM use odmdelete .. (#rmdev -dl rmtx --does not work
)
2) run cfgmgr
3)smit tivoli-add -tape-add drives .will give you mt0--mt6 available (STK9710)
4)define drives to Tivoli by define drive
Shekhar ..
Dirk Billerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/15/2001
10:37:08 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade
Hello Alex,
this is not always true. As far as I remember the AIX readme you have to
redefine your devices because the update will delete them. So write them
down first...
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With best regards,
Bien amicalement,
CU/2,
Dirk Billerbeck
Dirk Billerbeck
GE CompuNet Kiel
Enterprise Computing Solutions
Am Jaegersberg 20, 24161 Altenholz (Kiel), Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 117, Fax: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 190,
Internet: dirk.billerbeck @ gecits-eu.com
This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not disclose or use the information contained in it.
If you have received this mail in error, please tell us
immediately by return email and delete the document.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 15.03.2001 15:46:40
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mailbox.dekelnsm
cc:
Subject: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade
--
Hi Roy
You should be able to install the code with almost no intervention. The
drives wont need reconfiguring, it would be as simple as upgrading from
3.7.0 to 3.7.1 for instance
Regards
Alex
Roy Lake
cc:
Sent by: Subject: TSM 3.7 to 4.1
Upgrade
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
15/03/2001
12:29
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
Hi Chaps,
Its coming to that time of the year where we have to think about upgrading
our TSM server from 3.7.x to 4.1.x.
Can you please confirm what this process involves?.
I understand that we have to re-define the licences, but do we also have to
re-define the library, and drives, etc?.
Anywhere where I can find out more as the docs are as usual very unhelpful.
Kind Regards,
Roy Lake
TBG European IT
Tel: 0208 526 8883
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** IMPORTANT INFORMATION **
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("the Intended
Recipient")
to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is privileged and
confidential
within the meaning of applicable law. Accordingly any dissemination,
distribution, copying
or other use of this message or any of its content by any person other than
the Intended
Recipient may constitute a breach of civil or criminal law and is strictly
prohibited.
The views in this message or it's attachments are that of the sender.
If you are not the Intended Recipient please contact the sender and dispose
of this email
as soon as possible. If in doubt contact the Tibbett & Britten European IT
Helpdesk
on 0870 607 6777 (UK) or +0044 870 607 6777 (Non UK).
=?iso-8859-1?Q?$RFC822.eml?=
Re: Oracle Database Backups
there is no full/incremental in TSM .. Jane Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/13/2001 04:41:11 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Oracle Database Backups Given the following scenario, Full DB backup on SAT Incremental backup on Sun-Fri If I have a huge database, say 2 TB, Is this a typical scenario as far as schedules are concerned? ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ $RFC822.eml
Oracle error after TSM backup.
Hi all , On one RS/6000 Box , i am not using Tivoli`s scheduler., Instead I use maestro scheduler . It executes script which shut downs the oracle database.. Performs backups --and brings oracle up.. for some reason the database does not come up from last week , and has to start manually .. While doing so it gives some problems. Here is the log of backup at the end of it you will see some errors. I don't know where to look for these errors in TSM, Oracle or AIX? Thanks Shekhar .. medrs2:more O46854.0115 === = JOB : MEDRS2#WKLYRS2.RS2BKUP = USER : root = JCLFILE : /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/rs2script = Job Number: 46854 = Mon Mar 12 01:15:17 EST 2001 === MAESTRO for UNIX/JOBMANRC 6.1 (C) Tivoli Systems Inc. 1998 Starting /maestro/jobmanrc /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/rs2script MAESTRO for UNIX (AIX)/JOBINFO 6.1 (9.3) (C) Tivoli Systems Inc. 1998 Installed for group 'DEFAULT'. Oracle Server Manager Release 3.1.5.0.0 - Production (c) Copyright 1997, Oracle Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production With the Partitioning and Java options PL/SQL Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production SVRMGR> Connected. SVRMGR> Database closed. Database dismounted. ORACLE instance shut down. SVRMGR> 115 (1%) Server Manager complete. Database "ACWQ" shut down. O46854.0115 (2%) Oracle Server Manager Release 3.1.5.0.0 - Production (c) Copyright 1997, Oracle Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production With the Partitioning and Java options PL/SQL Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production SVRMGR> Connected. SVRMGR> Database closed. Database dismounted. ORACLE instance shut down. SVRMGR> Server Manager complete. Database "ACWT" shut down. Oracle Server Manager Release 3.1.5.0.0 - Production (c) Copyright 1997, Oracle Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Node Name: MEDRS2 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 3, Release 7, Level 4.0 Server date/time: 03/12/01 01:17:35 Last access: 03/11/01 03:51:51 Incremental backup of volume '/' Incremental backup of volume '/usr' Incremental backup of volume '/var' Incremental backup of volume '/home' Incremental backup of volume '/ora01' Incremental backup of volume '/ora02' Incremental backup of volume '/ora03' O46854.0115 (10%) Incremental backup of volume '/ora04' Incremental backup of volume '/ora05' Incremental backup of volume '/ora06' Incremental backup of volume '/maestro' Incremental backup of volume '/tsm' Incremental backup of volume '/tsmpool' Incremental backup of volume '/tsmdb' Incremental backup of volume '/tsmdb1' Incremental backup of volume '/tsmdata' ANS1898I * Processed 1,000 files * Directory--> 1,536 / [Sent] Normal File--> 712 /bosinst.data [Sent] Normal File-->20,552 /dsmerror.log [Sent] Normal File--> 6,380 /image.data [Sent] Special File-->0 /dev/fd0 [Sent] Special File-->0 /dev/mt0 [Sent] Special File-->0 /dev/mt1 [Sent] Retry # 1 Normal File--> 1,390 /maestro/stdlist/2001.03.11/NETMAN [ Sent] Retry # 1 Normal File--> 1,281 /maestro/stdlist/2001.03.11/O40184.0 425 [Sent] Retry # 1 Normal File-->42,722 /maestro/stdlist/2001.03.11/O45034.0 115 [Sent] Retry # 1 Normal File-->32,735 /maestro/stdlist/2001.03.12/O46854.0 115 [Sent] Successful incremental backup of '/maestro' Successful incremental backup of '/tsm' Successful incremental backup of '/tsmpool' Successful incremental backup of '/tsmdb' Successful incremental backup of '/tsmdb1' O46854.0115 (82%) Successful incremental backup of '/tsmdata' Total number of objects inspected: 64,270 Total number of objects backed up: 297 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 20 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred:26.07 GB Data transfer time:5,628.10 sec Network data transfer rate:4,858.98 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate: 3,370.30 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 02:15:14 SQL*Plus: Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production on Mon Mar 12 03:32:53 2001 (c) Copyright 1999 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved. Total System Global Area 193621124 bytes Fixed Size64644 bytes Variable Size 126275584 bytes Database Buffers 67108864 bytes Redo Buffers 172032 bytes Database mounted. Database opened. SQL> Disconnected from Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Productio n46854.0115 (91%) With the Partitioning and Java options PL/SQL Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Produ
Dr. Watson in NT after installing TSM4.1
Hi all , I installed TSM server 4.1 on WINNT 4.0 service pack 4 , RAM 256 MB whenever i open configuration wizard to configure any of the parameters in TSM DR. WATSON shows his face .. what should i check to correct this problem .. Thanks shekhar
Re: restore error
found something exactlly what is happening with my restore .. http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm97/1604.html shekhar Nicholas Cassimatis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/08/2001 01:48:06 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: restore error Shekkar, That looks like the filesystems in question are already mounted, and you're trying to restore the mount points. You'll either need to unmount the filesystems in question before the restore (then remount them before you restore data to them) or just ignore the error. I'd just ignore it - it's saying it couldn't overwrite something that was already there, and since you need it there, I'd say it's OK. Nick Cassimatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] $RFC822.eml
Re: restore error
Restore stops after this error messages .. so i can`t ignore it .. something is going on with symbolic links.. I am looking atfollowsymbolic option just suggested by Richard .. > ANS4029E Error processing '/psoft.PRD/app/oracle': unable to build a > directory p > ath; a file exists with the same name as a directory > > ANS4029E Error processing '/psoft.PRD/app/TUXEDO': unable to build a > directory p > ath; a file exists with the same name as a directory > > > ANS4029E Error processing '/fs35': unable to build a directory path; a > file exis > ts with the same name as a directory > > ANS4029E Error processing '/home': unable to build a directory path; a > file exis > ts with the same name as a directory Nicholas Cassimatis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/08/2001 01:48:06 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: restore error Shekkar, That looks like the filesystems in question are already mounted, and you're trying to restore the mount points. You'll either need to unmount the filesystems in question before the restore (then remount them before you restore data to them) or just ignore the error. I'd just ignore it - it's saying it couldn't overwrite something that was already there, and since you need it there, I'd say it's OK. Nick Cassimatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] $RFC822.eml
restore error
Good morning all , i am restoring some files from old adsm server and getting following errors ..any idea? > ANS4029E Error processing '/psoft.PRD/app/oracle': unable to build a > directory p > ath; a file exists with the same name as a directory > > ANS4029E Error processing '/psoft.PRD/app/TUXEDO': unable to build a > directory p > ath; a file exists with the same name as a directory > > > ANS4029E Error processing '/fs35': unable to build a directory path; a > file exis > ts with the same name as a directory > > ANS4029E Error processing '/home': unable to build a directory path; a > file exis > ts with the same name as a directory >
Re: Offsite Storage w/out DRM
DRM makes all this very easy, and tracks all tapes moves them onsite offsite, etc Also creates disaster recovery plan file every day , which contents scripts to recover from disaster. i also have some pearl scripts which mails me all this info and prints copy for operators to carry tapes offsite and onsite I tested DRM at Disaster recovery site and worked very well .. Without DRM its bit difficult to pass DR test .. my opinion .. Joe Faracchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/07/2001 01:40:01 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Offsite Storage w/out DRM DRM? WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING DRM! We do it manually. We decided that any/all/only offsite COPYPOOL tapes that are FULL would be sent offsite first thing Wed a.m. We mark them as access=offsite. We have perl scripts that follow these rules. COPYPOOL tapes that are offsite & pending are recalled on a 3 week rotation. we do 3 db backups and since now there's SNAPSHOT we use that but still printout all the volume lists and volhist , etc that we can we backup volhist and devconfig to floppy disk and send all that out too. ...joe.f. But I still pray I've done enough since management doesn't see the need for disaster recovery drills (yet) and I haven't been given a chance to test my setup. Wanna lend me an AIX with 35Gigs of free disk space Joseph A Faracchio, Systems Programmer, UC Berkeley On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, John Marquart wrote: > Hello all, > I am working on setting up an offsite storage plan, and needed to > get some clarification on my configuration. > > > 1) Based on the _TSM for AIX: Admin Guide_ Ch. 20, I came up with the > following schedule: > > $RFC822.eml
q actlog
I am getting following outputs in actlog : what action should i take ? class attributes will be used for expiration. 03/06/01 14:00:14 ANR0830W Management class STANDARD in domain UNIX used by node MEDRS2 in file space /ora05 is no longer active, or no longer has a BACKUP copy group: DEFAULT management class attributes will be used for expiration. 03/06/01 14:00:15 ANR0830W Management class STANDARD in domain UNIX used by node MEDRS2 in file space /home is no longer active, or no longer has a BACKUP copy group: DEFAULT management class attributes will be used for expiration. 03/06/01 14:00:15 ANR0830W Management class STANDARD in domain UNIX used by node MEDRS2 in file space /tsm is no longer active, or no longer has a BACKUP copy group: DEFAULT management class attributes will be used for expiration. 03/06/01 14:00:15 ANR0830W Management class STANDARD in domain UNIX used by node MEDRS2 in file space /ora03 is no longer active, or no longer has a BACKUP copy group: DEFAULT management class attributes will be used for expiration. 03/06/01 14:00:16 ANR0830W Management class STANDARD in domain UNIX used by node MEDRS2 in file space /ora04 is no longer active, or no longer has a BACKUP copy group: DEFAULT management class attributes will be used for expiration. 03/06/01 14:00:16 ANR0830W Management class STANDARD in domain UNIX used by some output shots.. SM>q domain Policy ActivatedActivated Number ofDescription Domain Policy Default Registered Name Set Mgmt Nodes Class ----- NOTESNOTESNOTES15 NOVELL MEDNOV NOVDIAG 4 NT MEDNTDIAGNOST-37 ICSNT ORACLE STANDARD STANDARD 0 SQL STANDARD STANDARD 0 STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD 3 UNIX UNIX UNIX 8 VMS STANDARD STANDARD 1 WINDOWS STANDARD STANDARD 0 WINDOWS_- 0 NT tsm: TSM>q mgmt Policy Policy Mgmt Default Description Domain Set Name ClassMgmt Name Name Class ? ---- NOTESACTIVE NOTES1 Yes NOTESNOTESNOTES1 Yes NOTESSTANDARD 7YEARS No 7 year archive NOTESSTANDARD STANDARD Yes Installed default management class. NOVELL ACTIVE NOVDIAG Yes NOVELL MEDNOV NOVDIAG Yes NOVELL STANDARD 7YEARS No 7 year archive NOVELL STANDARD STANDARD Yes Installed default management class. NT ACTIVE DIAGNOST-Yes ICSNT NT MEDNTDIAGNOST-Yes ICSNT NT STANDARD 7YEARS No 7 year archive NT STANDARD STANDARD Yes Installed default management class. more... ( to continue, 'C' to cancel) NT STANDARD TDMS_7YE-No 7 year archive AR ORACLE ACTIVE 7YEARS No 7 year archive ORACLE ACTIVE STANDARD Yes Installed default management class. ORACLE STANDARD 7YEARS No 7 year archive ORACLE STANDARD STANDARD Yes Installed default management class. SQL ACTIVE 7YEARS No 7 year archive SQL ACTIVE STANDARD Yes Installed default management class. SQL STANDARD 7YEARS No 7 year archive SQL STANDARD STANDARD Yes Installed default management class. STANDARD ACTIVE 7YEARS No 7 year archive STANDARD ACTIVE CRITICAL No Installed default management class. STANDARD ACTIVE STANDARD Y
