Operational Reporting Question - sending Mails to more than one address
Hi all, short question ;-) is it possible to send the failed/missed reports from the Operational Reporting tool to more than one email-address? If yes - How can we do this? We need to send the mails to the node admin and his deputy. Thanks in advance! -- mit freundlichen Grüßen Joachim Stumpf Abt. P1514 Datenschutz/Storage Systemadministration Datev eG Paumgartner Straße 6-14, 90329 Nürnberg Tel.: +49 911 276 7452
Re: TSM 5.3
Hi Joe, at the German Storage Users-Guide in Nuremberg IBM told us last week that 5.3 will be available in december via ftp and in january via CD. I think you should call IBM if you are planning to migrate to 5.3 as fast as it will come out to get a beta version for test. Good luck ;-) -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / regards Joachim Stumpf Abt. P1514 Datenschutz/Storage Systemadministration Datev eG Paumgartner Straße 6-14, 90329 Nürnberg Tel.: 0911 276 7452 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original-Nachricht folgt - Does anybody know if TSM 5.3 beta or preview is publicly available. We received Power Point info on new 5.3 from our IBM contact. He said it's coming out in December. Thanks, Joe Crnjanski Infinity Network Solutions Inc. Phone: 416-235-0931 x26 Fax: 416-235-0265 Web: www.infinitynetwork.com
InsertSlashHack missing dirDelimter - on W2K node with 5.1.5.9
Hi together, I searched adsm.org but found no useful help for InsertSlashHack ... Has anyone seen this error before? This happens since a few days on a W2K-Node with 5.1.5.9 (TSM-Server 5.2.2.1 on z/OS). The admin of the W2K Node told us that there is no file Ri... On that client. Also the Objects ...\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\u are not files - these objects are directories. From the dsmerror.log: - Sorry - the admin installed the client in german language :-( 03.08.2004 21:40:53 ANS4037E Datei '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\n' während der Verarbeitung geändert. Die Datei wurde übersprungen. 03.08.2004 21:40:53 ANS1228E Senden des Objekts '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\u' fehlgeschlagen 03.08.2004 21:40:53 ANS4037E Datei '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\u' während der Verarbeitung geändert. Die Datei wurde übersprungen. 03.08.2004 21:40:54 ANS1228E Senden des Objekts '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\v' fehlgeschlagen 03.08.2004 21:40:54 ANS4037E Datei '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\v' während der Verarbeitung geändert. Die Datei wurde übersprungen. 03.08.2004 21:40:54 ANS1228E Senden des Objekts '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\w' fehlgeschlagen 03.08.2004 21:40:54 ANS4037E Datei '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\w' während der Verarbeitung geändert. Die Datei wurde übersprungen. 03.08.2004 21:40:54 ANS1228E Senden des Objekts '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\y' fehlgeschlagen 03.08.2004 21:40:54 ANS4037E Datei '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\y' während der Verarbeitung geändert. Die Datei wurde übersprungen. 03.08.2004 21:40:54 ANS1228E Senden des Objekts '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\z' fehlgeschlagen 03.08.2004 21:40:54 ANS4037E Datei '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\KonfigDB.Net\SourceSafe\vss_dotnet\data\z' während der Verarbeitung geändert. Die Datei wurde übersprungen. 03.08.2004 21:43:09 WARNING: InsertSlashHack missing dirDelimter, continuing... 03.08.2004 21:43:11 WARNING: InsertSlashHack missing dirDelimter, continuing... 03.08.2004 21:43:20 WARNING: InsertSlashHack missing dirDelimter, continuing... 03.08.2004 21:43:21 ANS1228E Senden des Objekts '\\svnue510\d$\E44\Projekte\SWS\RiÌÌÌ' fehlgeschlagen 03.08.2004 21:43:21 ANS1304W Aktives Objekt nicht gefunden Kind regards Joachim Stumpf
Re: Show commands
you can also look at http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/TSMM/SC32-9103-00/en_US/HTML/info_show_cmds.html -- mit freundlichen Grüßen Joachim Stumpf Abt. P1514 Datenschutz/Storage Systemadministration Datev eG Paumgartner Straße 6-14, 90329 Nürnberg Tel.: 0911 276 7452 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original-Nachricht folgt - Does anyone know where I can find a list of the show commands in TSM? Then you obviously don't know about http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts Enjoy. No charge. Observe the caution notice at the head of the Show commands list. These are not commands intended for general use. Some are innocuous, some far from it. Proceed with risk awareness. Richard Sims
Re: Need experiences with TSM 5.2.x upgrade on z/OS
Joe, at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1 (straight!). We had a performance issue which you can fix with a ZAP (APAR PQ80211). If you upgrade without doing the cleanup backupgroups on 5.1.7.3 (or later) first, the TSM-Server will do it itself after upgradedb. This process cannot be stopped and used a lot of CPU (before the ZAP). Now with the ZAP it ran between 30min and 45min. on our 16GB Databases. The 5.2.1.1 code seems to be stable but we have the garbage char. problem which will be fixed in I think 5.2.2! hope this helps, regards Joachim Stumpf - Original-Nachricht folgt - We're preparing to upgrade our TSM 5.1.6 server to 5.2.x. We run on z/OS and have seen the writeup on apar PQ80211. IBM recommends either coming up to TSM 5.1.7.3 and running CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPS prior to beginning the upgrade to 5.2.x, or upgrading straight to 5.2.1.3 (which doesn't seem to be available yet - don't you just love being on the edge?) to get the fix for the apar. There's also a zap available to fix the problem with CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPS. Has anyone been through this? What seems to be the cleanest way to deal with this issue? Joe Howell Shelter Insurance Companies Columbia, MO - Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
Re: V5.1.8.0 server on z/OS
Hi, at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1 on z/OS (But we are not migrating to 5.1.8 first). After upgradedb of the first server we had a huge problem with the performance and IBM told us to ZAP our DSMSERV module in the linklib (APAR PQ80211). Now everything works fine and I can upgrade the rest of our TSM-Servers ;-) regards Joachim Stumpf - Original-Nachricht folgt - I was planning to upgrade my z/OS server to 5.1.7 when 5.1.8 came out (I want to go to 5.2.x but need to figure out what I need to do to get the tapes since the ftp site only seems to include patches to 5.2.x). I have installed this upgrade to my test server and so far so good ! Anyone performed this update, already ? Any problems jumping from 5.1.6.4 to 5.1.8.0 ? (yes, I realize an UPGRADEDB is required !) ? When I upgraded my test server, I jumped from 5.1.6.4 to 5.1.7.0 and then to 5.1.8.0.
Re: Trace flags...
Sam, if I want to trace a W2K client I use these parameters in the opt-file: * * Tracelog-File * *TRACEFlags service TRACEFlags perform TRACEFIle C:\Programme\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmtrace.log -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / regards Joachim Stumpf - Original-Nachricht folgt - TSMers, TSM Server AIX 5.1, TSM 5.1.6.2 TSM Client W2K, TSM 5.1.5.15 I'm trying to run a trace on a W2K client. I have used the following command, but see no output from the trace: dsmc sel 'filename' -subdir=yes testflag=instrument:detail This is supposed to create a trace file, dsminstr.report, in the same directory as the dsmerror.log. I'm not see it. Is there another option to name the output file? It seems to run, but no output is being created. Thanks, Sam Schrage Systems Engineer InfoSystems, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615-417-1887
Re: Z/OS and TSM - preferred server level??
Hi, at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1. If you are at 4.x you should have a look at: http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PQ80211 We had big problems with the performance during upgradedb (AuditDB run 80h with a 16GB database and used over 65h CPU). After the ZAP the Upgradedb took nearly 30min and used 3min. CPU. So the ZAP mentioned in the ARPAR worked for us. Good Luck ;-) -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / regards Joachim Stumpf - Original-Nachricht folgt - We are closing in on bringing up Z/OS 1.4 and with it a new version of TSM server. It looks like 5.1.7 was delivered with our server pac (FMID HDN5510). In a meeting earlier this week a Tivoli rep recommended that we go ahead and pull down the latest server level (5.2.1 w/5.2.2 due in early Dec.) Any recommendations or experiences with this platform and TSM levels out there worth passing along? We're currently at 4.1.4.2 As always, thanks in advance! -- Jim Kirkman AIS - Systems UNC-Chapel Hill 966-5884
Re: Z/OS and TSM - preferred server level??
Jim, I didn't recognize that you are at 4.1. I think theres no problem with the upgrade for you, because the problems we had were with the systemobjects of windows nodes which were included with 4.2. Our migrations: 3.7 -- 4.1.3 -- 4.1.5 -- 5.1.0.0 -- 5.1.1.6 -- 5.1.5.0 -- 5.1.5.3 -- 5.1.6.1 --- 5.1.6.3 and now we are migrating to 5.2.1.1 I think our problems with the systemobjects occured somewhere during migration from 4.1.5 to 5.1.6.3. -- mit freundlichen Grüßen Joachim Stumpf - Original-Nachricht folgt - Joachim, Thanks, I remember seeing something about this earlier. I wonder if it applies, though, as we are moving from 4.1.x and the problem description specifically references 4.2 and 5.1 From what release did you jump to 5.1.6? Stumpf, Joachim wrote: Hi, at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1. If you are at 4.x you should have a look at: http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PQ80211 We had big problems with the performance during upgradedb (AuditDB run 80h with a 16GB database and used over 65h CPU). After the ZAP the Upgradedb took nearly 30min and used 3min. CPU. So the ZAP mentioned in the ARPAR worked for us. Good Luck ;-) -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / regards Joachim Stumpf - Original-Nachricht folgt - We are closing in on bringing up Z/OS 1.4 and with it a new version of TSM server. It looks like 5.1.7 was delivered with our server pac (FMID HDN5510). In a meeting earlier this week a Tivoli rep recommended that we go ahead and pull down the latest server level (5.2.1 w/5.2.2 due in early Dec.) Any recommendations or experiences with this platform and TSM levels out there worth passing along? We're currently at 4.1.4.2 As always, thanks in advance! -- Jim Kirkman AIS - Systems UNC-Chapel Hill 966-5884 -- Jim Kirkman AIS - Systems UNC-Chapel Hill 966-5884
Re: Upgrade TSM 5.1.7 to 5.2.0 - how long should upgradedb take?
Hi, we saw nearly the same on upgrade from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1 on MVS. Upgrade went fine, but after start of the server with the new version TSM starts a process which you cannot see with q proc, uses lots of CPU, doesnt respond to MVS modify commands and lags with the AdminGUI. With the help from support we saw that the server starts an cleanup backupgroups after restart with 5.2.x.x. This process cannot be cancelled and uses the CPU a lot. Now we decided to go to 5.1.7.3 to use the cleanup backupgroups by our own (so we are able to stop this process if we need the CPU for backups/archives). btw: Take a look at PQ78408: ...ITSM Server V5.2 is modified to detect and correct the incorrect backup group entries during UPGRADEDB processing... regards, Joachim Stumpf
Re: Strange TSM 5.2 server versioning
Hi Eric, I noticed the same on TSM Server 5.2.1.1 on MVS: dsmc: Session established with server TADSM12: MVS Server Version 5, Release 2, Level 0.0 q st: Storage Management Server for MVS - Version 5, Release 2, Level 1.1 Server Name: TADSM12 -- mit freundlichen Grüßen Joachim Stumpf Abt. P1514 Datenschutz/Storage Systemadministration Datev eG Paumgartner Straße 6-14, 90329 Nürnberg Germany Tel.: +49 911 276 7452 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2003, 09:39:07, MEST): Hi *SM-ers! When logging on to the server through the admin interface: Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 5, Release 2, Level 0.0 Server date/time: 07-10-2003 09:18:35 Last access: 07-10-2003 09:17:32 Didn't I just install 5.2.1.1??? After a q status: tsm: TSMq status Storage Management Server for AIX-RS/6000 - Version 5, Release 2, Level 1.1 Server Name: TSM Notice the level now! Each time I logon to TSM it returns 5.2.0.0 while I'm actually running 5.2.1.1... Anyone noticed the following behavior on TSM 5.2 server? Or am I the only one? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: NDMP Backups using TSM
Hi Bala, look at http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21054144 hope that helps ;-) regards, Joachim Stumpf Balasubramanian Krishnamurthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Montag, 16. Juni 2003, 18:04:27, MEST): Hi, We are currently using NFS based backups for backing up our neap filers. I am wondering if NDMP Backups with TSM now allow us to do file/directory level restores. Also is 3-way NDMP backups possible with TSM ? IS NDMP backups for TSM using the same backup software [TSM 5.1.6.2 etc] with just additional license for NDMP or do we need any additional products TDP etc. thanks Bala Krishnamurthy
Re: HELP!!!
Hi, use this command to determine if your filespace is unicode enabled: q fi nodename * f=d Look if you can find the following line: Is Filespace Unicode?: If unicode is NO you have to rename your existing filespace and have to backup the node again (new full backup). Then it should be unicode enabled. regards Joachim Stumpf Mordechai Ochayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003, 13:10:01, MEST): Hi. Thank you for your reply. I'm using the key useunicodefilenames yes in dsm.sys , is that what you mean? Moti *** Mordechai Ochayon Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Soroka Medical Center P.O. Box 151 Beer-Sheva 84101, ISRAEL Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 972-8-6400547 , 972-8-6400142 Fax:972-8-6232334 - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mordechai Ochayon Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:20 AM Subject: Re: HELP!!! Hi! See if you useing UNICODE when you backing up the files. Try also to upgrade your TSM Client to ver 5.1.5.15 Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning Christian Svensson Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Cristie Nordic AB Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30 SE-131 06 Nacka Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77 Sweden eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2 web : www.cristie.com Mordechai Ochayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mordechai Ochayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-17 10:54 Please respond to Mordechai Ochayon To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: HELP!!! Hello. I have a Samba 2.2.7 on Red Hat Linux 9 with 50 users , to back up the system I'm using TSM 5 Version 5 ,Release 1 Level 5.0. Most of the files are in Hebrew... ; When I try to back up one of the Hebrew files i get an error in dsmerror.log : unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... ... How can I back up those hebrew files? Please help. Thanks a lot.
Re: HELP!!!
@Richard: I didn't know that - thanks for the info (Unfortunately I'm not very familiar with Linux, but will work on it ;-)) @Mordechai: In this case you should do what Richard mentioned in his preview posting... regards, Joachim Stumpf Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003, 13:52:54, MEST): use this command to determine if your filespace is unicode enabled: ... If unicode is NO you have to rename your existing filespace and have to backup the node again (new full backup). Then it should be unicode enabled. Joachim - The original posting was from a Linux client user... TSM supports Unicode only for the Windows and Macintosh environments. The Linux system is pretending to be Windows for the purpose of serving Windows Shares, as a file server. But as a full-service server it also somehow needs to back up those files. The only way I see to accommodate that is code page handling through Samba, per my prior posting. Richard Sims, BU
Re: ITSM v5.2?
Hi all, on GSE/Europe they (IBM) told us that the ITSM 5.2 will be released in May or June. An there should be a new ITSM-Server for Linux z/Series too ;-) -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany - Original-Nachricht folgt - I got a Sneak Peek of ITSM 5.2 which said June 2003 - subject to change. Ken Sedlacek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/02/2003 01:52 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:ITSM v5.2? Does anyone have a release date for this? I was ordering some v5.1 manuals, and happened to see there is a v5.2 manual (Admin. Ref. for Windows), GC32-0783-01. URL: http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/c3207831.pdf 5.2 anyone?? Ken Sedlacek AIX/TSM/UNIX Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Certified Specialist: RS/6000 AIX v4.3 Support IBM Certified Specialist: RS/6000 SP PSSP 3 Tivoli Certified Consultant - Tivoli Storage Manager v4.1
Re: ANR9999D IMUTIL(4923) - delete filespace
Hello, with the help from support I was able to delete the filespace. But first: auditdb inventory fix=yes on TSM-Server 5.1.6.2 finished with RC=1 after 65000 lines of output -- and the the error was still there. After upgrading the TSM-Server to 5.1.6.3 I was able to run the auditdb with RC=0. Audit deleted some invalid entries (254 entries) and after this I was able to delete the filespace. Information from PQ71960 which is still open: Support gave me the information that during the upgradedb from 4.x to 5.1.x FSID and NODEID were be converted with zero. -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany - Original-Nachricht folgt - Henk ten Have, the result of show bfo 0 243145 is Bitfile Object: 0.243145 Bitfile Object NOT found. I called support (created pmr at IBM-Webpage) and wait now for their call ;-) And I think I'm lucky - my TEST-DB is only 500MB... thanks for your help - I will post here again when I have a solution (or other important informations) -- regards Joachim Stumpf - Original-Nachricht folgt - Joachim, I tried to delete a filespace on my TSM-Test-server (V5.1.6.2 on z/OS 1.4) and got the following messages. Has anyone seen this before? What can I do? Is my DB corrupted? At least you'r lucky it's your test-server... ANRD IMFSDEL(1864): ThreadId517 Error deleting group leader 0 243145. ANR0985I Process 11 for DELETE FILESPACE running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 13:12:52. Try a show bfo 0 243145. If you'r lucky, this command shows something like: Storage Pool ID: xx Volume ID: yy Volume Name: 'volume_name'. If yes, you can try a audit vol 'volume_name' fix=3Dyes. If not, try a auditdb. (How big is your database?). And if yes or no, always call your local Support immediatly, these errors are damn serious. Cheers, Henk ten Have (running a auditdb fix=3Dyes on a testserver for +3 days now, database=3D70Gbyte, Processed 318836522 database entries sofar) -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
Re: ITSM V5.1.6 for MVS/OS-390
Shannon, we are running ITSM 5.1.6.1 on z/OS 1.4. Till now we have no problems with this version. We had a problem with 5.1.6.0 and the admin-gui which was fixed with 5.1.6.1. At the moment I have an open PMR at IBM with a (I think) corrupted DB on our 5.1.6.2 TEST server. This problem is still open and I will repost to the list how I fixed it (if its possible to fix it...) -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original-Nachricht folgt - I have been watching the list closely for any MVS/OS-390 ITSM v5.1.6 server upgrades that have been successful. I have not noticed any. Is there anyone out there who has upgraded and used the MVS v5.1.6 successfully? April 15th is coming up quickly and I have sent my order in to IBM for the ITSM V5.1.6 server. We will probably 'just do it' and hope for the best Our test environment is very small so it will not be a great help even though we will install it there first. Anyone know of anything I should be aware of? Also, I have seen a list of levels and patches that need to be installed in order for other ITSM server environments. Mostly, I think, to clear up the old orphan System Objects problem. Does anyone know where I might find this list for MVS? The one I saw was at a TSM Users meeting, someone was going to check if there was a special order of installs for MVS but I have never heard back from them. I would appreciate any and all feedback. Thank You, Shannon Bach Madison Gas Electric Co. Operations Analyst - Data Center Services Office 608-252-7260 Fax 608-252-7098 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ANR9999D IMUTIL(4923) - delete filespace
Hello together, I tried to delete a filespace on my TSM-Test-server (V5.1.6.2 on z/OS 1.4) and got the following messages. Has anyone seen this before? What can I do? Is my DB corrupted? ANR2017I Administrator T03281A issued command: DELETE FILESPACE T03281A 4 NAMETYPE=FSID TYPE=ANY DATA=ANY WAIT=NO ANR0984I Process 11 for DELETE FILESPACE started in the BACKGROUND at 13:12:52. ANR0802I DELETE FILESPACE oldsysobj (fsId=4) (backup/archive data) for node T03281A started. ANRD IMUTIL(4923): ThreadId517 Bitfile id 0.0 not found in Object.Ids. ANRD IMUTIL(6899): ThreadId517 Error 19 deleting dependent backup object 0.0. ANRD IMFSDEL(1864): ThreadId517 Error deleting group leader 0 243145. ANR0985I Process 11 for DELETE FILESPACE running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 13:12:52. -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
Re: ANR9999D IMUTIL(4923) - delete filespace
Henk ten Have, the result of show bfo 0 243145 is Bitfile Object: 0.243145 Bitfile Object NOT found. I called support (created pmr at IBM-Webpage) and wait now for their call ;-) And I think I'm lucky - my TEST-DB is only 500MB... thanks for your help - I will post here again when I have a solution (or other important informations) -- regards Joachim Stumpf - Original-Nachricht folgt - Joachim, I tried to delete a filespace on my TSM-Test-server (V5.1.6.2 on z/OS 1.4) and got the following messages. Has anyone seen this before? What can I do? Is my DB corrupted? At least you'r lucky it's your test-server... ANRD IMFSDEL(1864): ThreadId517 Error deleting group leader 0 243145. ANR0985I Process 11 for DELETE FILESPACE running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 13:12:52. Try a show bfo 0 243145. If you'r lucky, this command shows something like: Storage Pool ID: xx Volume ID: yy Volume Name: 'volume_name'. If yes, you can try a audit vol 'volume_name' fix=yes. If not, try a auditdb. (How big is your database?). And if yes or no, always call your local Support immediatly, these errors are damn serious. Cheers, Henk ten Have (running a auditdb fix=yes on a testserver for +3 days now, database=70Gbyte, Processed 318836522 database entries sofar)
Re: TSM Client download
try ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com via anonymous ftp and guide your ftp client through the directories to the client downloads. -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Abdulaziz Almuammar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 21. Januar 2003, 13:52:01, CET): Hi Guys, I would like to download the TSM client 5.1 for Linux. when i went to Tivoli site, it asked me to put User name and password. is there any other site where i can download this client without any regesteration issue? thaks
Problem with Novell 4.2.3.0 Client
Hello out there, we upgraded our Novell-Clients with version 4.2.3.0 and now we have problems with the backups. cut from the errorlog: ... 01/15/2003 20:32:33 (TSA500.NLM 5.5 315) The program's attempt to scan failed, probably because an invalid path was specified. 01/15/2003 20:32:33 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=1 from fioGetDirEntries: PVCS: /DVS/6.6/DVS_VdConv/VdConv14 01/15/2003 20:32:35 ANS1301E Server detected system error 01/15/2003 20:32:35 ANS1512E Scheduled event '20_00_INCR' failed. Return code = 4. I dont know why this occours here? PVCS:/DVS/6.6/DVS_VdConv/VdConv14 is a valid directory to backup. No special signs like german umlauts or others... Anyone here has seen this before? btw: Server is a TSM 4.1.6.0 on z/OS 1.2 -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
Re: How to Unsubscribe?
just send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body: unsubscribe adsm-l -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Jaganathan, Velumani [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2002, 09:18:24, CET): Hello All, How do I unsubscribe from this mailing list? I wanted to give a different mailid, as my company mailid is getting full very soon. Thanks and Regards, Velumani
new DB fields in 5152 server?
Hi together, today I upgraded our TSM-test-server (z/OS) from V5.1.5.1 to V5.1.5.2. If I perform a SELECT * FROM NODES I see 3 new fields in the table (NODES.TCP_NAME, NODES.TCP_ADDRESS, NODES.GUID). But the TCP_Name and TCP_address are not valid name or address I only see: TCP_NAME = åàà TCP_ADDRESS = îàåîåîê anyone else has seen this? -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
Re: Find ITSM downloads by going to 'Downloads' under 'Self Help'
Hi Donna, I followed the link under Self help in hope to get information about a new ITSM-Server version on z/OS. But there's *NOTHING*. I did not found any information about z/OS server updates on 5.1.x.x. Only w2k, aix, solaris, etc are supported. I created an PMR at IBM-Germany and asked for the new version (and I got them...) But why there's *NO* further information about TSM - z/OS updates/patches on the ITSM website at the moment? The only thing I found was a z/OS server update/patch to 4.2.x.x -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Donna Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2002, 23:20:46, MEST): I see a number of TSM user's having problem getting the latest maintenance code from IBM Tivoli Storage Manager new support home page at http://www-3.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html If you click on All Support Downloads under Support Downloads this will take you back to a page on tivoli.com site. The correct place to get the maintenace code is to click on Downloads under Self Help to get the server and client downloads for IBM Tivoli Storage Manager. The WEB page page has been updated to explain that the All Support Downloads is to get *all* Tivoli Products. Unfortuneately that link to All Support Downloads will continue to link back to the tivoli.com web site until all data has been migrated to ibm.com. --- Donna Jee Tivoli Storage Manager Server Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Differences between network transfer rates
Hi Sascha, we had the same question a few months ago. The network transfer rate doesnt tell you something about your network speed. As far as I know the network transfer rate is calculated like this: All bytes sent from the Node session time where the session time is the whole session time (include filespace scans; media wait times; etc.) Tivoli told us to look at the aggregated network transfer rate; this is the rate the client needs to transfer the aggregates to the server... Tivoli also told us to trace the sessions with the traceflag -perform to see the performance of the session. hope this helps ;) -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Sascha Braeuning [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 20. August 2002, 16:48:31, MEST): Hi all, I've got a question about network transfer rates: What could be the reason, the transfer rates difference is as high as shown below? (different servers, LAN 100 MBit) E.G. Network data transfer rate:148,670.70 KB/sec E.G. Network data transfer rate: 491.58 KB/sec How does Tivoli calculate these results? MfG Sascha Bräuning Sparkassen Informatik, Fellbach OrgEinheit: 6322 Wilhelm-Pfitzer Str. 1 70736 Fellbach Telefon: (0711) 5722-2144 Telefax: (0711) 5722-1630 Mailadr.: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TSM 4.2.2.2 for OS/390
Hi, we have the same problem with one of our servers. If I do a q assoc the server crashes with 0C4. ... ANR5965I Console command: Q ASSOCIATION ANR2017I Administrator SERVER_CONSOLE issued command: QUERY ASSOCIATION PADSM00 abending: MVS Abend code 000C4000 generated at location A24C889E ... TSM-Server-Version 4.1.5.0 On some other servers (Version 4.1.6.0) the q assoc works fine. -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Sascha Braeuning [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Freitag, 16. August 2002, 14:00:05, MEST): Hello, I've got a problem with TSM 4.2.2.2 for MVS. If I start a query with the command 'query association' the server (application) crashes down. Are there any experiences with that problem? MfG Sascha Bräuning Sparkassen Informatik, Fellbach OrgEinheit: 6322 Wilhelm-Pfitzer Str. 1 70736 Fellbach Telefon: (0711) 5722-2144 Telefax: (0711) 5722-1630 Mailadr.: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: the object is in use by another process
Hi Timothy, this was already discussed in this list... the RC=4 in 4.2.0.0 client is a code defect. You should use the last fixtest for 4.2. -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany taford [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 25. Juni 2002, 18:49:30, MEST): Hello all, I see allot of reference to Return code - 4, but not sure why it is happening. Seeing allot of this error message lately. Is this something that is addressed in a new release? I am not sure what is happening. My domain statements are correct. Using C: and E: only. I am currently running Server Version..: Ver. 4, Rel. 1, Lev. 4.0 and Client Version Ver. 4 Rel. 2, Lev. 0.0 06/24/2002 19:44:29 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Total number of objects inspected: 13,939 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Total number of objects backed up: 33 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Total number of objects updated: 0 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Total number of objects rebound: 0 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Total number of objects deleted: 0 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Total number of objects expired: 0 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Total number of objects failed: 0 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Total number of bytes transferred:19.77 MB 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Data transfer time:3.86 sec 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Network data transfer rate:5,245.85 KB/sec 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Aggregate data transfer rate: 23.55 KB/sec 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Objects compressed by:0% 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Elapsed processing time: 00:14:19 06/24/2002 19:44:29 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END 06/24/2002 19:44:29 ANS4987E Error processing '\\ntassm\e$ ': the object is in use by another process 06/24/2002 19:44:29 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END LAN_1930_INCR 06/24/2002 19:30:00 06/24/2002 19:44:29 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'LAN_1930_INCR' failed. Return code = 4. 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Sending results for scheduled event 'LAN_1930_INCR'. 06/24/2002 19:44:29 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'LAN_1930_INCR'. Regards, Timothy A. Ford, MCSE LAN Services Micron Technology, Inc.
Re: Delete DB snapshot volume
If you use TSM-Server 4.1.3 there is a known error with the DEL VOLHIST command. It is fixed in 4.1.5 and allows a FORCE=YES Parameter. http://techsupport.services.ibm.com/server/390.uhuic_getrec?args=DVsteamboat.boulder.ibm.com+DB390+DA48383+STPQ51312+USbin -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Tomá¹ Hrouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Montag, 24. Juni 2002, 11:40:02, MEST): Don't work ... this was first I was trying. Because this is the last and only one (unfortunatelly) DB snapshot volume that was created (for test reasons), TSM don't allow to delete it. I know, this is due to security reasons . but a little half-baked when you are missed. I would appreciate some FORCE=YES parameter. :-(( Tom -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Seay, Paul Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Delete DB snapshot volume DELETE VOLHISTORY TODATE=mm/dd/ TYPE=DBSnapshot This will delete all DBSnapshot volumes up to the TODATE. Once you have done that the tape will scratch. Unfortunately, you cannot specify the specific volume you want to delete. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon, INC 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Toma9 Hrouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Delete DB snapshot volume Hi all, Some time ago a had performed some DB snapshot to tape due to test device class definition. Now I want use this temporary tape but I can't because it is tracked in DB ans cannot be deleted as last DB snapshot series volume. Is any way to clear this reference adnd reuse this tape if it is 6 months old and normal full backups are performed on daily basis? Thanks Tom --- Pxmchozm zprava neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolovano antivirov}m systimem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.371 / Virova baze: 206 - datum vydanm: 13.6.2002
Re: DSMSERV DUMPDB , LOADDB and AUDITDB
Hi Sean, in our installation an audit took about 4-5h for a 10GB DB on TSM-server 4.1.3 (OS: OS/390 R2.10). A few months ago I had an open pmr at IBM where I wanted to know WHY my DB is inconsistent after the loaddb but they couldnt give me an answer :( -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 18. Juni 2002, 11:29:13, MEST): Hi I need to do a DUMPDB , LOADDB and AUDITDB of our TSM database. I have currently done the DUMPDB and LOADDB and this process took about 13 Hours to complete. Total db before DUMPDB : 23 GB Total db after Dumpdb and Loaddb : 12 GB After the Loaddb was completed it requesting to have an AUDITDB done before bringing up the TSM server. I would like to know how long it would take to do AUDITDB with a fix=yes and detail=no after the database has been reduced by nearly half the size ? Has anyone done this before or is there another way of doing the above as our database is in an inconsistent state? We are running our TSM server on AIX 4.3.3 and the server is attached to the SP (WinterHawk2 Wide Node). The storage is attached to the Shark. Thks Sean Ramnarayan TSM/UNIX Administrator EDS ( South Africa) MMS caltex.com made the following annotations on 06/18/2002 11:29:09 AM -- DISCLAIMER This message may contain confidential information that is legally privileged and is intended only for the use of the parties to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any information in this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. Thank you. ==
Re: List of characters valid
Hi Rob, I think this depends on the language your server and clients are running with... ...and if you use unicode filespaces (not supported until 4.2.x.x servers) you shouldnt have problems with special language characters... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Rob Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002, 20:35:38, MEST): Hello all, Server: AIX 4.3.3 with TSM 4.1.3.2 Clients: NT4 with TSM 4.2.1.5 Does anyone know of where I can find a list of character or symbols that are invalid to be used in the front, middle or end of a file for a backup? Thanks, Rob Hefty Computer Operations Lab Safety Supply 608-757-4998
result code ? - second try
Hi together, i asked this question a few days ago, but didnt get any responses...so I try it again ;-) since we have upgraded our TSM server from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5 on OS/390 2.10 we get result codes ? from the clients in some cases (clients are 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0). But i dont know why this happens? Anybody know where this code come from and why it did not have a known number? thanks in advance... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
result code ?
Hi together, since we have upgraded our TSM server from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5 on OS/390 2.10 we get result codes ? from the clients in some cases (clients are 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0). But i dont know why this happens? Anybody know where this code come from and why it did not have a known number? thanks in advance... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
Re: TSMManager
Ronald, you can download a demo version at http://www.tsmmanager.com and test it a few weeks. theres also a good instruction and faq page available ;) -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Loket AMEV IP TSM Beheer Loket.AMEVI[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Freitag, 26. April 2002, 11:35:10, MEST): Hi, Can anyone tell me some thing about the tool TSM Manager? It seems pretty cool to me. But how does it act in live envoirroment? With regards Ronald Bazuin ***DISCLAIMER*** Deze e-mail is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Verstrekking aan en gebruik door anderen is niet toegestaan. Fortis sluit iedere aansprakelijkheid uit die voortvloeit uit electronische verzending. This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee(s), and may not be passed on to, or made available for use by any person other than the addressee(s). Fortis rules out any and every liability resulting from any electronic transmission. 03**
Re: Client Message - size estimate exceeded
Hi Farren, 2 weeks ago I had a pmr open at IBM about this problem. This happens if the storagepool backuppool runs full during your clients backing up and you have compressalways yes in your dsm.opt. I opened the pmr at IBM because I was not sure if the file that the TSM tried to backup was backuped correct. And the file was not backed up. The TSM also did not do any retries for this file. IBM told me that is works as designed. What do you think? Should the TSM retry the file? Because after the error message the rest of the backup went fine. Heres the pmr: Abstract: question - backuppool full . Operating System: OS/390 Product Group: ADSTAR Distributed Storage Manager . Environment: TSM Server 4.1.5 on OS/390 R2.10 . Problem: Hi, I have a question about the error message ANS1311E. We got this message as the backuppool went full during a backup. (a Migration was running at this time...) schedlog looks like: 03/13/2002 22:26:25 Normal File--96,649,216 \\file32 \d$\Home\T03381A\archiv.pst [Sent] 03/13/2002 22:26:52 Normal File--28,409,856 \\file32 \d$\Home\T03381A\BL.pst ** Unsuccessful ** 03/13/2002 22:26:52 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\file32 \d$\Home\T03381A\BL.pst' failed 03/13/2002 22:26:52 ANS1311E Server out of data storage space 03/13/2002 22:26:52 ANS1898I * Processed89,500 files * 03/13/2002 22:27:36 Normal File-- 181,224,448 \\file32 \d$\Home\T03468A\TG.pst ** Unsuccessful ** 03/13/2002 22:27:36 ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. 03/13/2002 22:29:47 Retry # 1 Normal File-- 181,224,448 \\file32\d$\Home\T03468A\TG.pst [Sent] server log: 22.26.47 STC00778 ANR0534W Transaction failed for session 17 for node FILE32 (WinNT) - size 22.26.47 STC00778 estimate exceeded and server is unable to obtain additional space in storage 22.26.47 STC00778 pool BACKUPPOOL. Question: Was the file '\\file32\d$\Home\T03381A\BL.pst' backed up right? If not...why the TSM doesent retry this file to backup in the storagepool? The rest of the backup seemed to be ok. regards, Joachim Stumpf -ORTENREITER, M.MVS-5698TSMVS -L25A/CFETSM-P3S3-02/03/15-05:15--CR S5 SERVICE GIVEN= 99 SG/99/ Asked for the schedulelog, errorlog and any msg's in the activitylog. Asked also for output from a 'q backup'. -ORTENREITER, M.MVS-5698TSMVS -L25A/CFWTSM-P3S3-02/03/18-06:44--CR S5 SERVICE GIVEN= 39 SG/39/ D: There is only one object listed in the log, which was not backed up due to msg ANS1311E Server out of data storage space. The same time msg ANR0534W Transaction failed for session 17 for node FILE32 (WinNT) - size estimate exceeded and server is unable to obtain additional space in storage pool BACKUPPOOL. Customer confirmed that the backup-pool was filled up
Re: Client Message - size estimate exceeded
Hi Farren, I changed compressalways to no. With compressalways yes it happens like this: The client sends the estimated filesize to the server. But the file grows up during compression and is send greater than estimated. The backuppool is 99% full and the server cant store the file in the backuppool and skips the file WITHOUT any retries. IBM also told us to enhance the backuppool size or set up a second migration task for the backuppool. -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Farren Minns [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 2. April 2002, 13:24:09, MEST): Hi Stumpf I must admit that seeing as TSM does manage to complete the rest of the backup, It should also retry the failed file. Free space could then be available. Did you actually change any of your settings to solve the problem? Thanks for your reply Farren :) Stumpf, Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/04/2002 12:17:28 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Client Message - size estimate exceeded Hi Farren, 2 weeks ago I had a pmr open at IBM about this problem. This happens if the storagepool backuppool runs full during your clients backing up and you have compressalways yes in your dsm.opt. I opened the pmr at IBM because I was not sure if the file that the TSM tried to backup was backuped correct. And the file was not backed up. The TSM also did not do any retries for this file. IBM told me that is works as designed. What do you think? Should the TSM retry the file? Because after the error message the rest of the backup went fine. Heres the pmr: Abstract: question - backuppool full . Operating System: OS/390 Product Group: ADSTAR Distributed Storage Manager . Environment: TSM Server 4.1.5 on OS/390 R2.10 . Problem: Hi, I have a question about the error message ANS1311E. We got this message as the backuppool went full during a backup. (a Migration was running at this time...) schedlog looks like: 03/13/2002 22:26:25 Normal File--96,649,216 \\file32 \d$\Home\T03381A\archiv.pst [Sent] 03/13/2002 22:26:52 Normal File--28,409,856 \\file32 \d$\Home\T03381A\BL.pst ** Unsuccessful ** 03/13/2002 22:26:52 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\file32 \d$\Home\T03381A\BL.pst' failed 03/13/2002 22:26:52 ANS1311E Server out of data storage space 03/13/2002 22:26:52 ANS1898I * Processed89,500 files * 03/13/2002 22:27:36 Normal File-- 181,224,448 \\file32 \d$\Home\T03468A\TG.pst ** Unsuccessful ** 03/13/2002 22:27:36 ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. 03/13/2002 22:29:47 Retry # 1 Normal File-- 181,224,448 \\file32\d$\Home\T03468A\TG.pst [Sent] server log: 22.26.47 STC00778 ANR0534W Transaction failed for session 17 for node FILE32 (WinNT) - size 22.26.47 STC00778 estimate exceeded and server is unable to obtain additional space in storage 22.26.47 STC00778 pool BACKUPPOOL. Question: Was the file '\\file32\d$\Home\T03381A\BL.pst' backed up right? If not...why the TSM doesent retry this file to backup in the storagepool? The rest of the backup seemed to be ok. regards, Joachim Stumpf -ORTENREITER, M.MVS-5698TSMVS -L25A/CFETSM-P3S3-02/03/15-05:15--CR S5 SERVICE GIVEN= 99 SG/99/ Asked for the schedulelog, errorlog and any msg's in the activitylog. Asked also for output from a 'q backup'. -ORTENREITER, M.MVS-5698TSMVS -L25A/CFWTSM-P3S3-02/03/18-06:44--CR S5 SERVICE GIVEN= 39 SG/39/ D: There is only one object listed in the log, which was not backed up due to msg ANS1311E Server out of data storage space. The same time msg ANR0534W Transaction failed for session 17 for node FILE32 (WinNT) - size estimate exceeded and server is unable to obtain additional space in storage pool BACKUPPOOL. Customer confirmed that the backup-pool was filled up to 99 pct. that time, but later to this msg other objects were backed up as expected although those were larger in size. For those file there is only logged: ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. E: The maxsizethreshold is 250 MB. The failing object was just 28 MB in size, while the next object was 181 MB in size and it was successfully bu'ed (after mounting a tape). The backup-pool is 39 GB in size and migr. threshold was set to 60/40 and one migration process could run at a time. (Values are currently changed to 40/20 and 2 migr. proc. - since that the pbl. did not reoccure.) There are 10 nodes scheduled for backup into this pool. All together those are backing up around 107 GB per night. A: Suggested to split the schedule or to increase the size of the backup-pool or to inrease the amount of mountpoints. Customer should avoid the situation that the stgpool will reach
Re: question: db-backup
Hi Henrik, thanks for your answer. But if we start the backup while application has the db allocated, we usually should get the file in use-message. Or not? At the moment we are testing the OSA-Gigabit-Adapter to backup our Nodes ;) Then the problem with the network should be solved... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Henrik Wahlstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mittwoch, 20. März 2002, 11:13:35, CET): Hey, As you write 'To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down. ' answers your question. No. Aren´t you having a networkproblem with speed less than 0,5Gb/hour? //Henrik |+- || Stumpf, | || Joachim | || joachim.stumpf| || @DATEV.DE | || Sent by: ADSM:| || Dist Stor | || Manager | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || ST.EDU| || | || | || 2002-03-20 | || 10:45 | || Please respond | || to ADSM: Dist | || Stor Manager | || | |+- | || | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) | | Subject: question: db-backup | | Hi together, We have a database to backup with TSM. This db is 2GB and the backup takes 5 hours. To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down. Is it possible to start the application during the db-backup? -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany --- Statoil: The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: question: db-backup
Hi again, the application is a MS-SQL 6.0 db-server. At 23:00h started the TSM-backup. And at 00:30h a person from the db-group tried a update to the db, but the backup was running. In this case the Node had a big problem with its RAM (RAM ran full) and our NT-Admin wanted to know if this was caused by the update of the db during a backup. Our Nodes usually have a 100Mbit network card and the server is an OS/390 TSM-Server;but we have lots of Nodes, so the transfer rate is very slow... but this is something else we had analized last summer ;) -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mittwoch, 20. März 2002, 13:58:15, CET): Hi Joachim, What kind of network are you using now? Is there something wrong with your NIC. With Tokenring you should at least get around 4 Gigabyte/Hour. Maybe consider compression on you ba client. Robert. Hi again Joachim, Yes you will receive 'file in use' message. What kind of database are you talking about and is it a online backup you are doing? You can try to change mode on the database during backup (but I´m not sure it will help) or make a database export and backup the exported copy. //Henrik |+- || Stumpf, | || Joachim | || joachim.stumpf| || @DATEV.DE | || Sent by: ADSM:| || Dist Stor | || Manager | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || ST.EDU| || | || | || 2002-03-20 | || 11:30 | || Please respond | || to ADSM: Dist | || Stor Manager | || | |+- --- -| | | | To: ADSM- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) | | Subject: Re: question: db- backup | --- -| Hi Henrik, thanks for your answer. But if we start the backup while application has the db allocated, we usually should get the file in use-message. Or not? At the moment we are testing the OSA-Gigabit-Adapter to backup our Nodes ;) Then the problem with the network should be solved... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Henrik Wahlstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mittwoch, 20. März 2002, 11:13:35, CET): Hey, As you write 'To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down. ' answers your question. No. Aren´t you having a networkproblem with speed less than 0,5Gb/hour? //Henrik |+- || Stumpf, | || Joachim | || joachim.stumpf| || @DATEV.DE | || Sent by: ADSM:| || Dist Stor | || Manager | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || ST.EDU| || | || | || 2002-03-20 | || 10:45 | || Please respond | || to ADSM: Dist | || Stor Manager | || | |+- - ---| | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) | | Subject: question: db-backup | - ---| Hi together, We have a database to backup with TSM. This db is 2GB and the backup takes 5 hours. To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down. Is it possible to start the application during the db-backup? -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany --- Statoil: The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying
Re: People running OS/390 TSM servers - maybe for the development guys......
Hi Christo, we are running TSM-Server 4.1.5 on OS/390. Im not very familiar with this OS/390- MVS- Stuff, but I can tell you that we have 10 TSM-Server running at 1 LPAR. We named the tasks TADSM01-TADSM10. The issue to do so was that we only wanted small databases. Now our dbs are from 7GB - 12GB. -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Christo Heuer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mittwoch, 20. März 2002, 11:55:08, CET): Hi all, OK - For those of you that does not know anything about OS/390 or don't run TSM servers on OS/390 this might be very boring and maybe a bit cryptic - ignore or just read for the fun. Now for the people that still run OS/390 TSM servers: I have always had my doubts about the scalability of OS/390 when it comes to a TSM server. Some of you might have seen me posting last year and early this year about the size of your TSM environment and if you are happy with the performance of TSM on OS/390 - only one guy answered giving me specs on the environment they run(Thanks to William Colwell), but other than that most people said they moved off OS/390 and are now running AIX or Sun or even Win2K servers. William described their environment as an 80 Mips processor box and a 166Gig db 88% used - and on top of all that he has good performance from this. Our environment is a 38 Gig db 80% used and we have crappy performance. Now in Adsm V3 a new parameter was introduced called MPTHREADING YES or NO. What this does is tell TSM that it can start multiple TCB's on multiple CP's - if you have multiple CP's on your box. Now we enabled this and noticed that TSM gets its knickers in a knot when there are too many things happening and the system is CPU constrained. In WLM it is guarenteed to get CPU and in WDM you can see that about 30% of the time it is delayed for CPU. What we have done now in Omegamon is to check how many work each of the TCB's does and then try and figure out why TSM would perform crappy even though it is getting about 50% of the total box. Now - here comes the part where development might be able to shed some light: The TCB called dsmserv (the server task), has a lmod caled IEANUC01 that has a CSECT of IGVGPVT that uses about 90-95% of all the CPU cycles - remember that this is one TCB assigned to one CP. On further investigation our IBM'er came back and said this IGVGPVT part controls getmain/freemain's for TSM. Now here comes the question: How can TSM be using 90% of a CP by just doing getmain/freemain and all the other TCB's that has a CP allocated just sit and wait for getmain/freemain's. This looks like a serious scalability issue with TSM on a multiple CP environment. According to our performance and MVS guys the only way we are going to squeeze more juice out of our OS/390 system with TSM is to split the workload of TSM and run two TSM servers on one LPAR or upgrade each CP to a more powerfull CP. Is this in line with development, and the way it should work? Thanks Christo Heuer ASBA Bank Johannesburg SOUTH AFRICA __ The information contained in this communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in reliance of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Absa is neither liable for the proper, complete transmission of the information contained in this communication, any delay in its receipt or that the mail is virus-free.
[no subject]
-- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
question: db-backup
Hi together, We have a database to backup with TSM. This db is 2GB and the backup takes 5 hours. To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down. Is it possible to start the application during the db-backup? -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
Re: People running OS/390 TSM servers - maybe for the development guys......
Hi Matt, we decided to have many small databases. thats why we have 10 TSM-Server. If we have to reorganize one of our database, we only have to shut down one TSM-Server. And we dont have one big server reorganizing or auditing for weeks ;) -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany MC Matt Cooper (2838) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mittwoch, 20. März 2002, 15:20:52, CET): At what point does it make sense to split your TSM address space? I have a 28GB 80% utilized DB using TSM 4.1.5 on a 9672-x57 that is running O.K.. I know the DB is going to grow because the TSM requirements are growing. Where should I expect to see problems? Christo, If your TSM on OS390 is spending all its time doing GETMAIN/FREEMAIN what is your REGION size and available memory? Is the system paging or is TSM trying to live in to small of an address space? Matt -Original Message- From: Stumpf, Joachim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: People running OS/390 TSM servers - maybe for the development guys.. Hi Christo, we are running TSM-Server 4.1.5 on OS/390. Im not very familiar with this OS/390- MVS- Stuff, but I can tell you that we have 10 TSM-Server running at 1 LPAR. We named the tasks TADSM01-TADSM10. The issue to do so was that we only wanted small databases. Now our dbs are from 7GB - 12GB. -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Christo Heuer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mittwoch, 20. März 2002, 11:55:08, CET): Hi all, OK - For those of you that does not know anything about OS/390 or don't run TSM servers on OS/390 this might be very boring and maybe a bit cryptic - ignore or just read for the fun. Now for the people that still run OS/390 TSM servers: I have always had my doubts about the scalability of OS/390 when it comes to a TSM server. Some of you might have seen me posting last year and early this year about the size of your TSM environment and if you are happy with the performance of TSM on OS/390 - only one guy answered giving me specs on the environment they run(Thanks to William Colwell), but other than that most people said they moved off OS/390 and are now running AIX or Sun or even Win2K servers. William described their environment as an 80 Mips processor box and a 166Gig db 88% used - and on top of all that he has good performance from this. Our environment is a 38 Gig db 80% used and we have crappy performance. Now in Adsm V3 a new parameter was introduced called MPTHREADING YES or NO. What this does is tell TSM that it can start multiple TCB's on multiple CP's - if you have multiple CP's on your box. Now we enabled this and noticed that TSM gets its knickers in a knot when there are too many things happening and the system is CPU constrained. In WLM it is guarenteed to get CPU and in WDM you can see that about 30% of the time it is delayed for CPU. What we have done now in Omegamon is to check how many work each of the TCB's does and then try and figure out why TSM would perform crappy even though it is getting about 50% of the total box. Now - here comes the part where development might be able to shed some light: The TCB called dsmserv (the server task), has a lmod caled IEANUC01 that has a CSECT of IGVGPVT that uses about 90-95% of all the CPU cycles - remember that this is one TCB assigned to one CP. On further investigation our IBM'er came back and said this IGVGPVT part controls getmain/freemain's for TSM. Now here comes the question: How can TSM be using 90% of a CP by just doing getmain/freemain and all the other TCB's that has a CP allocated just sit and wait for getmain/freemain's. This looks like a serious scalability issue with TSM on a multiple CP environment. According to our performance and MVS guys the only way we are going to squeeze more juice out of our OS/390 system with TSM is to split the workload of TSM and run two TSM servers on one LPAR or upgrade each CP to a more powerfull CP. Is this in line with development, and the way it should work? Thanks Christo Heuer ASBA Bank Johannesburg SOUTH AFRICA __ The information contained in this communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in reliance of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Absa is neither liable for the proper, complete transmission of the information contained in this communication, any delay in its receipt or that the mail is virus
Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client ( takes 8 ho urs)
Hi, we had the same problem in our WinNT (file-server Intel Pentium pro 2*200MHz) environment, but the problem was located in the LAN. In the end the switches to our HOST (OS/390) were to slow for the traffic. Since we use the OSA-channel to store to our TSM-Servers in OS/390, the aggregate network rate is at 650kb/s - 1,6MB/s! -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Alex Paschal [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Freitag, 8. März 2002, 19:48:41, CET): Demetrius, you beat me to it. To be exact, we've found that having Scan Outbound Files checked in McAfee really slowed down the scan. Letting McAfee stay up with Scan Outbound Files disabled resolved our problem. Alex Paschal Storage Administrator Freightliner, LLC (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail -Original Message- From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client ( takes 8 ho urs) Make sure you are not running your ANTI-VIRUS Software (McAfee) during the nightly incrementals -Demetrius -Original Message- From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (takes 8 ho urs) Total time taken 7hrs does not mean to xfer 818mb it took 7hrs with 11mb/sec. Was this in que.I have NT,hp,aix clients WITH MORE THAN THESE objects in 3.7.3 But all is ok . I think it was in que or ur n/w packets are dropped. Look for these.This is what my thought says. Balanand -Original Message- From: Poetzsch,Robert E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Inspecting over 200,000 objects with WinNT2000 client (takes 8 ho urs) Here is my recent sched.log file showing almost 8 hours to process 279,057 objects. I'm thinking that someone has some insight on how to Optimize a Windows client for more efficient nightly backups. Also, there is an error message about TCP/IP connection failure; which I believe is related to our dsm.opt configuration due to a time-out condition. The FS4500 Client is using Windows 2000 Server OS and TSM 3.7.1 Client, but we will soon upgrade to TSM version 4.2.1 to see if this helps. Thanks, -Bob Poetzsch Tivoli Storage Manager - System Administrator UCONN Health Center Farmington, CT 06030-5205 ___ 03/08/2002 05:34:46 Successful incremental backup of '\\fs4500\e$' 03/08/2002 05:34:47 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Server Version 3, Release 7, Level 1.0 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Data compression forced off by the server 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Server date/time: 03/08/2002 05:32:23 Last access: 03/07/2002 21:41:48 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects inspected: 279,057 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects backed up:1,805 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects updated: 1 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects rebound: 0 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects deleted: 37,519 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of objects failed: 0 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Total number of bytes transferred: 818.24 MB 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Data transfer time: 73.79 sec 03/08/2002 05:34:47 Network data transfer rate:11,353.75 KB/sec 03/08/2002 05:34:48 Aggregate data transfer rate: 29.56 KB/sec 03/08/2002 05:34:48 Objects compressed by:0% 03/08/2002 05:34:48 Elapsed processing time: 07:52:15 03/08/2002 05:34:48 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END 03/08/2002 05:34:48 ANS1017E Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure
Re: Undocumented messages - Convert archive?
we got the same messages in our environment (TSM Server on OS/390)... it would be nice if someone can shed some light into this ... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Alexander Verkooyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Freitag, 1. März 2002, 12:16:01, CET): Hello, Yesterday we got some undocumented messages in our server (4.2.1.11, AIX 4.3.3) activity log. One of clients (4.2.1.20, Windows NT) finished it's backup and then these messages appeared: 02/28/02 10:42:34 ANR0984I Process 282 for CONVERT ARCHIVE started in the BACKGROUND at 10:42:34. 02/28/02 10:42:35 ANR4392I Audit of the Arch.Description.Objects table for NODEBLAH completed (0): found 0 directories and files (0 inserted prior to Version 3), 0 object sets. Deleted: 0 directories and files, and 0 object sets. 02/28/02 10:42:35 ANR4393I Audit of the Description table for NODEBLAH completed (0): found 0 descriptions, 0 directories and files (0 inserted prior to Version 3), 0 object sets. Deleted: 0 descriptions, 0 directories and files, and 0 object sets. 02/28/02 10:42:35 ANR4394I Audit with the archive table for NODEBLAH completed (0). The description tables have 0 directories and files, 0 object sets. Inserted: 0 directories and files, and 0 object sets. 02/28/02 10:42:35 ANR0911I Conversion for NODEBLAH completed (successful). The description tables have 0 directories and files, 0 object sets. Conversion inserted 0 directories and files, and 0 object sets. 02/28/02 10:42:35 ANR0985I Process 282 for CONVERT ARCHIVE running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state SUCCESS at 10:42:35. ANR4392I, ANR4393I and ANR4394I are listed in the messages manual as Messages not appearing in this publication ANR09841I and ANR0985I are documented, but they just tell that a process has been started and has been completed. Does anybody if we should be worried or can we just ignore these undocumented messages? TIA, Alexander -- --- Alexander Verkooijen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Systems Programmer SARA High Performance Computing
Linux backup loops
Hi, we have a problem with one of our Linux Nodes. the errorlog looks like: 13.02.2002 11:34:36 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/home/t04520a/nsmail/.Entwürfe.summary' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 13.02.2002 11:34:59 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/opt/gnome/share/SuSEPreConf/SuSENautilusPage/SuSE Tour (español)' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 13.02.2002 11:37:07 B/A Txn Producer thread, fatal error, signal 11 13.02.2002 11:37:07 Trying port number 56582 13.02.2002 11:37:07 Obtained new port number on which to listen. And then the client restarts with backup on new port. But then it crashes at the same file/directory and tries the next port. This loops until the max sessions parm is reached and continues when a session is canceled from the server during timeout parms. The session on the server is still alive and in the end there are many (dead) sessions from this node: 13.02.2002 11:38:23 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/home/t04520a/nsmail/.Entwürfe.summary' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 13.02.2002 11:38:23 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/opt/gnome/share/SuSEPreConf/SuSENautilusPage/SuSE Tour (español)' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 13.02.2002 11:38:30 B/A Txn Producer thread, fatal error, signal 11 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56582 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56583 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56584 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56585 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56586 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56587 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56588 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56589 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56590 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Trying port number 56591 13.02.2002 11:38:30 Obtained new port number on which to listen. We tried to exclude the directory that seems to cause the problem. the inclexcl-list looks like: exclude /.../* exclude.dir /sbin exclude.dir /home exclude.dir /opt include /etc/.../* But it doesnt work. Environment: Server: 4.1.3.0 on OS/390 2.10 Client: 4.2.1.0 Any idea what will help to solve the problem? -- regards, Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
read this if you want to UNSUBSCRIBE from this list
Hi together, to unsubscribe write your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put your email in the head of the message! this should look like: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unsubscribe ADSM-L unsubscribe ADSM-L -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG
Re: PRESCHEDULECMD - POSTSCHEDULECMD
this is from my opt-file in w2k (remove the * in front of the parameter): ** * Pre-, Post-Commands ** *preschedulecmd c:\programme\admin\preadsm.bat *postschedulecmd c:\programme\admin\postadsm.bat -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Coats, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 26. Februar 2002, 21:05:12, CET): Question: Does anyone have a sample of using a pre and post schedule scripts? I need to do this on both Novell and NT/2K clients. TIA ... JC
Re: How do you pre-config windows dsm.opt file?
the TSM-client connects to your server if you start the ba-client. So you need a dsm.opt with this values: NodeName yournode TCPServeraddress yourserverip/name -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Keith Kwiatek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 12. Februar 2002, 13:55:34, CET): Hello, I extracted the TSM windows client files tot he TSM_IMAGES directory, and then placed a dsm.opt file (with JUST a couple parameters like schedlogretention) in the config directory, which then was successfully moved over to the baclient directory when the install completed, BUT when you launch the TSM client for the first time it gives a TCP/IP failure, until you go through the wizard and complete the rest of the configuration (nodename, tcpserveraddress...). Any way around this error message? Keith -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG
quiesce the database - possible?
Hi together, we run TSM-server 4.1.3.0 on OS/390 R2.10. Now we want to save our TSM-database with dss concurrent copy. For this its neccesary that on start of the cc-job the database is not in use (nothing should be changed in the db at this moment) Usually we have to shut down the running tsm-task and have to wait until the cc-job has started. But is there a chance to quiesce the db without stopping the tsm-task? Is this possible? -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG
Re: DOS attack?
To unsubscribe write your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and NOT to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-) -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Joe Callahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2002, 01:17:14, CET): I readily admit that I am one of those unsubscribers. My mailbox is being overrun with these messages that I have no interest in. Please do whatever is necessary to unsubscribe me. Thank you, Joe Callahan University of Phoenix Online Campus [EMAIL PROTECTED] 214-868-3529 972-712-1740 - Original Message - From: Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:51 PM Subject: DOS attack? I'm seeing all these unsubscribe messages, some of them from people whom I wouldn't expect to be unsubscribing. They all seem to have the same format. Is this some kind of lame attempt at a DOS attack on the list? Steve Harris ** This e-mail, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/ received in error. Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this e-mail is prohibited. It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to health service matters. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this e-mail in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by return e-mail. You should also delete this e-mail message and destroy any hard copies produced. **
Problem with german umlaut in Linux-Client?
Hi together, I didnt find something in the list-archive related to the new versions. Is there a known problem with TSM-Client for Linux 4.2.1.0 and german umlauts (äÄöÖüÜ,ß)? We have TSM-Server 4.1.3.0 on OS/390 2.10. The Linux version is SuSE 7.3. If we do a backup we get this in the error.log: 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.URSPRÜNGLICHEN.txt' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.URSPRÜNGLICHEN.html' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.MENÜ.txt' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.WEIß.txt' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.GELÖSCHT.txt' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.GEBÜHREN.html' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.SCHLÜSSEL.txt' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.NICHTUNTERSTÜTZT.html' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.HÄNGEN.txt' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.HÄNGER.txt' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.AUSWÄHLEN.html' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.TÄST.html' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.AUSFÜHRUNG.html' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:28 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/usr/share/doc/sdb/de/html/keylist.FRANZÖSISCH.txt' contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping... 05.11.2001 16:28:32 ANS1228E Sending of object '/home/t06286a/KDesktop/Mülleimer' failed 05.11.2001 16:28:32 ANS1304W Active object not found 05.11.2001 16:28:32 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '/' finished with 1 failure 05.11.2001 16:28:34 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'P25002T0' failed. Return code = 4. Any help would be great. -- Joachim Stumpf Datev eG
Fw: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients
I think it's true! I tested the new client on a W2k machine and I got the same RC you described below. If one file fails (e.g. it's in use by another proccess), the schedule returns with a result code of 4. I hope Tivoli works on a fix for that. We have some automatically checking for result code 0 (if there was a problem while backing up; and I think file in use... isn't a big problem) regards, Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Subash, Chandra [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2001, 06:41:31, MEST): i HAVE GOT THIS EMAIL FROM ONE OF MY FRIENDS. GUYS WHAT DO YOU THINK IS IT TRUE ? Hi Guys According to Tivoli Support they have made an alteration to way client v4.2.1 reports Result code 4 to the server. Earlier version clients would allow for a certain number of files to fail during the backup and still report to the server that the Schedule was successful. However version 4.2.1 has been altered so that a result code of failed will be reported to the server even if 1 file fails during a backup. ntcmachine had been failing on some WINNT system files which I have added exceptions for under direction of Tivoli support and now backups of this machine seem to be successful. Bob from Tivoli suggested that if we are worried about seeing failed result codes on the daily report that there may be a way to generate a report listing statistics of how many files or how much data had been backed up from each machine to provide a more accurate picture as to whether the backups were successful. -- i HAVE GOT THIS EMAIL FROM ONE OF MY FRIENDS. GUYS WHAT DO YOU THINK IS ITbr TRUE ?br br Hi Guysbr br According to Tivoli Support they have made an alteration to way clientbr v4.2.1 reports Result code 4 to the server. Earlier version clients wouldbr allow for a certain number of files to fail during the backup and stillbr report to the server that the Schedule was successful. However version 4.2.1br has been altered so that a result code of failed will be reported to thebr server even if 1 file fails during a backup.br ntcmachine had been failing on some WINNT system files which I have addedbr exceptions for under direction of Tivoli support and now backups of thisbr machine seem to be successful.br Bob from Tivoli suggested that if we are worried about seeing failed resultbr codes on the daily report that there may be a way to generate a reportbr listing statistics of how many files or how much data had been backed upbr from each machine to provide a more accurate picture as to whether thebr backups were successful.br
Journal-File-System
Greetings, Has anybody experience with the TSM-Journal-Filesystem on NT4? What about the incrthreshold-Parm in the opt-file? I just read the following in the TSM for Windows Using the Backup-Archive Client Manual: When a Windows client deletes a file or directory with a long name, it sometimes reports this using a compressed name. Does that mean, the TSM-Journal-DB saves the directories or files in DOS 8.3 notation? e.g.: c:\program~1 for c:\programme Has someone seen any problems with the journal filesystem? Thanks, -- Joachim Stumpf Datev eG
Re: Question on TSM 4.1.3.0 for MVS and OS390
Hi David, we have one Test-Server running with 4.1.3.0 on OS/390 2.10 and we have no problems. I think we will upgrade our other servers soon. But is it right, that unicode enabled filesystem are not realized in 4.1? I read something in TSM for Windows using the backup-archive client Version 4 Release 2 on page 4 that the server needs to be at 4.2 level. But the highest OS/390-Server-level is 4.1.3.0?!?! Does anybody have experience how to store with enabled unicodefiles? regards, Joachim Stumpf Datev eG David Browne. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 24. Juli 2001, 20:30:11, MEST): I currently have TSM 3.7.4.0 for MVS installed on OS390/2.10. I am backing up several different platforms on the client server, Novell 4.11, Novell 5.10, a couple different Versions of NT, also the following desktop clients, NT, Windows 95, 98 2000. I have several different Versions of the ADSM/TSM client code installed on the servers and workstations. Does anyone know of any glitches or problems I should be aware of with the TSM 4.1.3.0 for OS/390 code. --
DB-Reorg on OS/390
Hi together, does anybody have experience in reorganising a TSM Database on OS/390-Server (2.10)? We have 8 DB-Volumes Model-2 and there is only 47% used by the database. We would like to reduce the database. As you can see its only possible to reduce up to 220MB. Our Level is 3.7.4.0, but an upgrade to 4.1.3.0 is possible. Do you have any experience how long a reorg inclusive audit runs on OS/390 (2.10)? Is there something to consider before reorganising? Output of Q DB command: Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 11.480 11.480 0 220 4.096 2.938.880 1.391.319 47,3 47,4 regards, Joachim Stumpf Datev eG
