Re: Missed drive backup
Hello Geoff, The errors you are getting seems to point to a permission issue. If the backup is working manually but not with the scheduler, I would suggest you to verify the drive g: properties - security. Then check under which account the scheduler is installed (normally SYSTEM) and add this account for that drive is necessary. Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 07/02/2002 09:39:39 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Missed drive backup Hello all, This node has a drive on the SAN, drive G. The client software is version 4.2.1.15 on WIN2K, it is NOT a cluster. By using the old V3 admin gui I discovered that a filespace had not been backed up for many days but I'm told nothing has changed on the server. It's the drive on the SAN that is being missed with the below message in the error log. I've tried ALL-LOCAL and specifying C: D: G: for the Domain but no luck on either. The drive is there and accessible I checked. Am I missing an option I can't locate? 07/01/2002 20:05:54 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\cp-its-dcmecpd\g$' failed 07/01/2002 20:05:54 ANS1063E Invalid path specification Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
Re: URGENT : ANS1503E Valid password not available for server 'TSMA'
Hello Rachida, Are you logged in as root on the client? If not, please do so and run a dsmc q fi. This should prompt you to enter the password and the TSM client will encrypt again the new password. Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rachida elouaraini [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 07/01/2002 04:29:49 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:URGENT : ANS1503E Valid password not available for server 'TSMA' Hi all, My problem began when I changed the passwords of Three of my clients TSM (by the commande update node). Since my schedules are MISSED, and when I want to do an incremental or selective backup from one of the three nodes (dsmc i file) , I can't and the output of the command is : Node Name: MICHLEFEN ANS1503E Valid password not available for server 'TSMA'. The administrator for your system must run TSM and enter the password to store it locally. How can I do this, I have already changed the password of each node from the server interface (dsmadmc). All the platforms are AIX 4.3.3. TSM version is 4.1. Thank you in advance __ Boîte aux lettres - Caramail - http://www.caramail.com
Re: can I archive under excluded directories?
Hello Kai, The exclude.dir should not affect your archives. But be aware of APAR IC31329: EXCLUDE.DIR IS HONORED DURING AN ARCHIVE This is fixed in the 4.2.2.1 client level. Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kai Hintze [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 07/01/2002 04:08:56 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:can I archive under excluded directories? Oh most excellent TSM'ers, who have been there and done that! Using 4.x client talking to a 4.x host: If I exclude.dir a subdirectory, can I archive files from beneath that directory and have them last? The Using the B/A client manual says that you can perform selective backups from underneath an excluded directory, but the files expire with the next incremental. Will archives work anyway, or do I need to set up another node on the same box with a complementary inclexcl list? Thanks, Kai.
Re: FILESPACE_NAME vs. HL_NAME
Hello Mike, In UNIX, a filespace for ADSM is a filesystem. So in this case, it looks like the /work is the filespace unless you have mapped a directory like /work/data as a nfs at the time of the backup or perhaps you have used the client option virtualmountpoint. Hope this helps. Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 01/02/2002 04:11:23 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: FILESPACE_NAME vs. HL_NAME Good Afternoon, A client is having trouble locating archived files using dsmc q ar. The problem seems to be that the filespace_name and hl_names differ between the files, even though they were archived from the same place. Server: AIX, ADSM v3.1 Client: SunOS, ADSM v3.1 An example: select filespace_name,hl_name,ll_name,archive_date from archives where node_name='HUBER' and ll_name='BS0266' FILESPACE_NAME: /WORK HL_NAME: /DATA/MARTINE/ LL_NAME: BS0266 ARCHIVE_DATE: 2001-12-22 10:46:30.00 FILESPACE_NAME: /WORK/DATA HL_NAME: /MARTINE/ LL_NAME: BS0266 ARCHIVE_DATE: 2001-12-22 10:41:24.00 FILESPACE_NAME: /WORK/DATA/MARTINE HL_NAME: / LL_NAME: BS0266 ARCHIVE_DATE: 2001-11-20 05:38:10.00 Depending on how the client specifies the request, they will get a different version of the file. The question is, how does ADSM determine which part of the path is considered filespace_name, and which is hl_name? Thanks, Mike
Re: Hung Admin Sessions
Hello Tom, Are these sessions created by the admin command line or by the web? This could be caused by the APAR IC30203: ADMINISTRATIVE COMMAND-LINE SESSIONS MAY HANG ON THE TSM SERVER IF THE SESSIONS ARE CANCELLED WHILE AWAITING SERVER RESPONSE The APAR is fixed in the 4.1.5.0 server Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tom Melton [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 01/02/2002 02:41:26 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Hung Admin Sessions Storage Management Server for AIX-RS/6000 - Version 4, Release 1, Level 4.0 I have about 10 hung admin sessions, searched the archive and found many people have this problem. Has there been a resolution found? Is there a way to cancel these sessions, as the cancel command fails to work? Thanks in advance... Tom Melton Emory HealthCare
Re: UPGRADE VERSION AND CHANGE PLATAFORM
Hello Francisco, You cannot use directly your database on a different platform. If you will be using the same type of media, you will need to go through the Export Server and Import Server commands. Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FRANCISCO ROBLEDO [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 04/07/2001 08:10:01 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: UPGRADE VERSION AND CHANGE PLATAFORM Hi, We have ADSM server 3.1 in AIX 4.2.1, and buy a new license server 4.1 in Windows NT Is possible to upgrade or migrate my Database ?? Thanks in advance, Francisco Robledo VisionTech Colombia _ Do You Yahoo!? Obtenga su direccisn de correo-e gratis @yahoo.com en http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com
Re: Which is the best TSM-Version for IBM 3584-Ultrium ?
Hello Sabine, I believe support for LTO has been introduced in TSM 3.7.3.8 and TSM 4.1.1.0. But if you want to upgrade to TSM 4.1, I would suggest you the latest level: 4.1.3.0 Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sabine Rettenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] @VM.MARIST.EDU on 07/06/2001 09:34:14 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Which is the best TSM-Version for IBM 3584-Ultrium ? Hi, i have to add an IBM 3584-Ultrium to our ADSM-Landscape. Now the ADSM-Server is running with NT 4 Service Pack 5 and TSM 3.7.3.6. No i have to upgrade the server because of attaching 3584. Which TSM-Server-level is a good choice ? 4.1.2 oder 4.1.3 ??? Thank you Sabine Rettenberger Wolf Group
Re: INCLUDE/EXCLUDE list processing...
Hello Gerardo, 1. No, because the exclude/exclude is processed from the bottom of the list first until a match is found. This will exclude all your files. Please refer to your client manual for more details 2. I will try something like include /* policy1 (below the exclude /.../* of course) 3. The include /t/tuxedo/bialog/.../* policy2 and include /t/tuxedo/procesos/.../* policy2 should be below the include /t/.../* policy1 Hope this helps. Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gerardo Zapata [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 28/05/2001 01:58:55 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: INCLUDE/EXCLUDE list processing... Hi everyone, Could you help me taking a look at this incl/excl file (for unix boxes) and tell me wether the statemets are valid or not. 1. My intention is to back up only the filesystems marked as included in this list. Is it valid to put an exclude /.../* statement at the end of the file and then just include the filesystems I want to backup? 2. What happens with the inlcude / policy1 statement when using the /exclude /.../* in te same list? If this is not valid how can I tell TSM to backup the files under /? 3. Finally, can I specify a management class for /t/.../* and another one for /t/tuxedo/bialog/.../*?. The intention is to backup the /t/ filesystem (including subdirectories) with the rules specified in the policy1 management class but backup two specific /t/ subdirectories (/t/tuxedo/bialog/.../* and /t/tuxedo/procesos/.../*) within /t/ with the rules specified in policy2 management class. include / policy1 include /opt policy1 include /usr policy1 include /var policy1 exlcude /opt/tivoli/.../* include /t/tuxedo/bialog/.../* policy2 include /t/tuxedo/procesos/.../* policy2 include /var/adm/.../* policy2 include /t/.../* policy1 include /tivoli/.../* policy2 include /resporacle/resp/gfi/fond/.../* policy2 include /resporacle/resp/gfi/full*/.../* policy2 include /resporacle/resp/gfi/normal/.../* policy2 include /resporacle/resp/gfi/auditor*/.../* policy2 include /resporacle/resp/gfi/shell/.../* policy2 include /resporacle/resp/gfi/hist/.../* policy2 exclude /.../* Thanks in advance Gerardo Zapata González IT Specialist Infrastructure Systems Management IBM Mexico (52) 52705889 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
Re: W2K problems - client 4.1.2
Hello Petr, With the TSM 4.1.2.0 client, the "Elapsed processing time" is not correct (too short). APAR IC29212 has been opened for this issue. This should be fixed in the next client level. Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Petr Perost [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 01/09/2001 10:59:55 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: W2K problems - client 4.1.2 Hello , i am running TSM 4.1.2 on W2K SP1 and client 4.1.2 - one of W2K servers is used for storing user profiles - I am getting hundreds of errors ANE4005E about link stored in recent folder of users' user profiles , I am quite sure that this files didn't disappear during backup ( archive of this server ends without ANE4005 error in recent folder - only ANE4005 touches link to floppy ). How TSM client works with Lnk and url files in recent folder ? In the same time 4.1.2 produces very strange summary at the end of backup/archive operation : 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4952I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Total number of objects inspected: 266 514 " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4953I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Total number of objects archived: 266 333 " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4958I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Total number of objects updated: 0 " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4960I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Total number of objects rebound: 0 " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4957I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Total number of objects deleted: 0 " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4970I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Total number of objects expired: 0 " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4959I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Total number of objects failed: 181 " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4961I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Total number of bytes transferred:35,99 GB " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4963I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Data transfer time:4 731,06 sec " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4966I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Network data transfer rate:7 977,50 KB/sec " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4967I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Aggregate data transfer rate: 3 933,37 KB/sec " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4968I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Objects compressed by: 30% " 01/07/2001 20:39:58,"ANE4964I (Session: 3997, Node: XXX) Elapsed processing time:00:01:55 " I really can not find ANE4964I in 4.1 messages but i think that 00:01:55 means 1 minut and 55 second. Did somebody see similar ANE4964I problem ? Yours Petr Prerost e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Redirecting output on novell servers.
Hi Mark, I would suggest you to try the following syntax: load dsmc restore xxx (CLIB_OPT)/SYS:\output.txt Hope this helps, Vo An Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 11/15/2000 14:47:19 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Redirecting output on novell servers. Hello, Except for the adsm schedule log I cannot find a way to save output from the command line interface. I need the results of big restores or big manual backups saved. -- Mark Brown Operations Supervisor = Tel --- 514-398-2321 Fax --- 514-398-6876 E-mail --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how is a weekly FULL bkup scheduled?
Hi James, I believe this is working as designed. The client manual (TSM 4.1 for UNIX ) states under the exclude option for exclude.dir: "When you exclude a directory, you can still back up specific files within that directory, using a selective backup. However, the next time you perform an incremental backup, these backup versions are expired." Regards, Vo An Nguyen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] James Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/01/2000 14:54:57 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: how is a weekly FULL bkup scheduled? If you want to take it a little deeper, has anyone else noticed that selective backups do not honor the exclude.dir statement? Whether this is a feature or a bug I don't know. James Thompson
