Re: Error in OC for device class

[Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM]

Hi everybody,

I would like to share the results of the case I opened for the device class 
error condition when it's not used by storage pools. I will explain the way it 
works by using the following abbreviations:

FS=Free space on the filesystem(s) used by the deviceclass
ML=Mount limit of the deviceclass
MC=Max Capacity of the deviceclass
NSA=Number of Scratch volumes Allocatable
PU=Percentage of Unallocatable scratches

NSA=FS/MC
PU=(ML-NSA)/ML

This percentage should ideally be 0. higher than 25% will trigger a warning, 
higher than 50 will trigger a critical.
The thresholds can be displayed with q statusthresh 
DEF_FILEDEVCLASSPCTSCRUNALLOCATABLE_W and q statusthresh 
DEF_FILEDEVCLASSPCTSCRUNALLOCATABLE_E, the defaults are 25 for warning and 50 
for error.

The dirty fix for a warning or critical is to change the thresholds, but for 
small deviceclasses you want to make sure your ML is not too high and your MC 
is not too large, so everything will fit.

Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup


-Original Message-
From: Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM 
Sent: donderdag 26 maart 2020 13:03
To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager 
Subject: RE: Error in OC for device class

Hi Erwann,

Yes, that's indeed what I discovered too. When I issue the command q 
monitorstatus status=error, the error status trigger which SPOC uses is 
displayed. In my case:

Server Name  Activity DateActivity NameElement Name Element 
 Element String   Element State
Numeric 
ValueValue
---  ---  ---  ---  
---  ---  ---
AMSE326-03-2020   NON-SHARED   DBBACKUP 50  
  ERROR
  12:40:41 FILE DEV
   PERCENTAGE
   SCRATCH
   VOLUMES
   UNALLOCATABLE

The Element Numeric Value indeed changes when I raise or lower the deviceclass 
mount limit or maxcap. However, I cannot find how it is being calculated.

My deviceclass currently uses:

 Device Class Name: DBBACKUP
Device Access Strategy: Sequential
Storage Pool Count: 0
   Device Type: FILE
Format: DRIVE
 Est/Max Capacity (MB): 204,800.0
   Mount Limit: 8

The directory it uses has 997G of free space available: 

df -Ph|grep dbbackup
/dev/mapper/vgl_etsm01-lvl_dbbackup  1.2T  140G  997G  13% 
/tech/tsm/AMSE3/dbbackup

But 8 * 200GB is 1.6 TB. So why is the Element Numeric Value 50 at this moment?
I have a case open at this moment and I requested support to ask the developers 
how this value is being calculated. If I receive an answer, I will let you all 
know.
Thanks for your help!

Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager  On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON
Sent: woensdag 25 maart 2020 05:02
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error in OC for device class

Hi Eric,

When there is no Storage Pool associated with a FILE Device Class, the 
following parameters are considered to trigger a warning or error status :
- maxcapacity (device class parameter)
- mountlimit (device class parameter)
- available space (in the filesystem pointed by the directory device class 
parameter)
- DEF_FILEDEVCLASSPCTSCRUNALLOCATABLE_[W|E] (statusthresholds)

maxcapacity * mountlimit should not exceed the status thresholds.

I generally adjust the mountlimit parameter value to avoir crossing the 
threshold.

PS : I'm pretty there was a technote describing this in the past, but I've been 
unable to find it. Here's another one, describing a similar issue : 
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/file-devclass-reported-warning-operations-center

-- 
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

- Mail original -
De: "Eric van Loon (ITOP NS) - KLM" 
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mercredi 18 Mars 2020 12:57:44
Objet: [ADSM-L] Error in OC for device class

Hi guys,

In Operation Center an critical error is shown for some of my servers with a 
device class without a storagepool. When I issue the command q monitorstatus 
status=error, the following error is listed:

Server Name  Activity DateActivity NameElement Name Element 
 Element String   Element State
Numeric 
ValueValue
---  ---  ---  ---  
---  ---  ---
AMSE418-03-2020   NON-SHARED   DBBACKUP 50  
  ERROR
  12:44:09 FILE DEV
   PERCENTAGE

Re: Error in OC for device class

[Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM]

Hi Erwann,

Yes, that's indeed what I discovered too. When I issue the command q 
monitorstatus status=error, the error status trigger which SPOC uses is 
displayed. In my case:

Server Name  Activity DateActivity NameElement Name Element 
 Element String   Element State
Numeric 
ValueValue
---  ---  ---  ---  
---  ---  ---
AMSE326-03-2020   NON-SHARED   DBBACKUP 50  
  ERROR
  12:40:41 FILE DEV
   PERCENTAGE
   SCRATCH
   VOLUMES
   UNALLOCATABLE

The Element Numeric Value indeed changes when I raise or lower the deviceclass 
mount limit or maxcap. However, I cannot find how it is being calculated.

My deviceclass currently uses:

 Device Class Name: DBBACKUP
Device Access Strategy: Sequential
Storage Pool Count: 0
   Device Type: FILE
Format: DRIVE
 Est/Max Capacity (MB): 204,800.0
   Mount Limit: 8

The directory it uses has 997G of free space available: 

df -Ph|grep dbbackup
/dev/mapper/vgl_etsm01-lvl_dbbackup  1.2T  140G  997G  13% 
/tech/tsm/AMSE3/dbbackup

But 8 * 200GB is 1.6 TB. So why is the Element Numeric Value 50 at this moment?
I have a case open at this moment and I requested support to ask the developers 
how this value is being calculated. If I receive an answer, I will let you all 
know.
Thanks for your help!

Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager  On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON
Sent: woensdag 25 maart 2020 05:02
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error in OC for device class

Hi Eric,

When there is no Storage Pool associated with a FILE Device Class, the 
following parameters are considered to trigger a warning or error status :
- maxcapacity (device class parameter)
- mountlimit (device class parameter)
- available space (in the filesystem pointed by the directory device class 
parameter)
- DEF_FILEDEVCLASSPCTSCRUNALLOCATABLE_[W|E] (statusthresholds)

maxcapacity * mountlimit should not exceed the status thresholds.

I generally adjust the mountlimit parameter value to avoir crossing the 
threshold.

PS : I'm pretty there was a technote describing this in the past, but I've been 
unable to find it. Here's another one, describing a similar issue : 
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/file-devclass-reported-warning-operations-center

-- 
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

- Mail original -
De: "Eric van Loon (ITOP NS) - KLM" 
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mercredi 18 Mars 2020 12:57:44
Objet: [ADSM-L] Error in OC for device class

Hi guys,

In Operation Center an critical error is shown for some of my servers with a 
device class without a storagepool. When I issue the command q monitorstatus 
status=error, the following error is listed:

Server Name  Activity DateActivity NameElement Name Element 
 Element String   Element State
Numeric 
ValueValue
---  ---  ---  ---  
---  ---  ---
AMSE418-03-2020   NON-SHARED   DBBACKUP 50  
  ERROR
  12:44:09 FILE DEV
   PERCENTAGE
   SCRATCH
   VOLUMES
   UNALLOCATABLE

This device class is used for database backup only and has no storagepool 
connected, so that's why there is no percentage of scratch volumes available. 
Anybody know how to solve this error?
Thanks for your help in advance!

Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any at

Re: Error in OC for device class

[Erwann SIMON]

Hi Eric,

When there is no Storage Pool associated with a FILE Device Class, the 
following parameters are considered to trigger a warning or error status :
- maxcapacity (device class parameter)
- mountlimit (device class parameter)
- available space (in the filesystem pointed by the directory device class 
parameter)
- DEF_FILEDEVCLASSPCTSCRUNALLOCATABLE_[W|E] (statusthresholds)

maxcapacity * mountlimit should not exceed the status thresholds.

I generally adjust the mountlimit parameter value to avoir crossing the 
threshold.

PS : I'm pretty there was a technote describing this in the past, but I've been 
unable to find it. Here's another one, describing a similar issue : 
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/file-devclass-reported-warning-operations-center

-- 
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

- Mail original -
De: "Eric van Loon (ITOP NS) - KLM" 
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mercredi 18 Mars 2020 12:57:44
Objet: [ADSM-L] Error in OC for device class

Hi guys,

In Operation Center an critical error is shown for some of my servers with a 
device class without a storagepool. When I issue the command q monitorstatus 
status=error, the following error is listed:

Server Name  Activity DateActivity NameElement Name Element 
 Element String   Element State
Numeric 
ValueValue
---  ---  ---  ---  
---  ---  ---
AMSE418-03-2020   NON-SHARED   DBBACKUP 50  
  ERROR
  12:44:09 FILE DEV
   PERCENTAGE
   SCRATCH
   VOLUMES
   UNALLOCATABLE

This device class is used for database backup only and has no storagepool 
connected, so that's why there is no percentage of scratch volumes available. 
Anybody know how to solve this error?
Thanks for your help in advance!

Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Error in OC for device class

[Lucian Vlaicu]

the devclass I use for these worm tapes is "ULTRIUM5W"


tsm: ARDTSM1>q devclass

Device    Device Storage Device    Format 
Est/Max  Mount

Class Access    Pool Type Capacity  Limit
Name  Strategy Count  (MB)
- -- --- - -- 
 --
BACKUPDE- Sequential   0 FILE  DRIVE 
2,048.0 20

 VCLASS
DISK  Random   6
ULTRIUM5  Sequential   5 LTO   DRIVE 
1,536,00 DRIVES

0.0
ULTRIUM5W Sequential   1 LTO   DRIVE 
1,536,00 DRIVES

0.0

tsm: ARDTSM1>



On 3/23/2020 11:53 PM, Hall, Lynn wrote:

What does "q devclass dbbackup" tell you?






[image: OCIO-logo-Transparent.png] 



Lynn Hall

Information Technology Specialist IV

Platform Services

Office of the Chief Information Officer

1305 E Walnut Street | Des Moines, IA 50319  - Mailing

mobile 515-669-4325

ocio.iowa.gov

[image: social media icons_Twitter cir.png]
[image:
social media icons_LinkedIn cir.png]



On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 6:59 AM Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM <
eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:


Hi guys,

In Operation Center an critical error is shown for some of my servers with
a device class without a storagepool. When I issue the command q
monitorstatus status=error, the following error is listed:

Server Name  Activity DateActivity NameElement Name
  Element  Element String   Element State

Numeric ValueValue
---  ---  ---  ---
---  ---  ---
AMSE418-03-2020   NON-SHARED   DBBACKUP 50
 ERROR
   12:44:09 FILE DEV
PERCENTAGE
SCRATCH
VOLUMES
UNALLOCATABLE

This device class is used for database backup only and has no storagepool
connected, so that's why there is no percentage of scratch volumes
available. Anybody know how to solve this error?
Thanks for your help in advance!

Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If
you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or
any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other
action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may
be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission
of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
number 33014286




--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Re: Error in OC for device class

[Hall, Lynn]

What does "q devclass dbbackup" tell you?






[image: OCIO-logo-Transparent.png] 



Lynn Hall

Information Technology Specialist IV

Platform Services

Office of the Chief Information Officer

1305 E Walnut Street | Des Moines, IA 50319  - Mailing

mobile 515-669-4325

ocio.iowa.gov

[image: social media icons_Twitter cir.png]
[image:
social media icons_LinkedIn cir.png]



On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 6:59 AM Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM <
eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> In Operation Center an critical error is shown for some of my servers with
> a device class without a storagepool. When I issue the command q
> monitorstatus status=error, the following error is listed:
>
> Server Name  Activity DateActivity NameElement Name
>  Element  Element String   Element State
>
> Numeric ValueValue
> ---  ---  ---  ---
> ---  ---  ---
> AMSE418-03-2020   NON-SHARED   DBBACKUP 50
> ERROR
>   12:44:09 FILE DEV
>PERCENTAGE
>SCRATCH
>VOLUMES
>UNALLOCATABLE
>
> This device class is used for database backup only and has no storagepool
> connected, so that's why there is no percentage of scratch volumes
> available. Anybody know how to solve this error?
> Thanks for your help in advance!
>
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
>
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If
> you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or
> any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other
> action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may
> be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the
> sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its
> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission
> of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
> number 33014286
> 
>

Re: error retrieving archives

[David Jelinek]

On 08/23/2017 03:00 PM, Skylar Thompson wrote:

> Is the original filesystem different from the destination filesystem? It
> looks like the destination filesystem is having issues with the extended
> attributes TSM has stored for the archived files.

Most likely, at least different versions.

--
Have a wonderful day,
David Jelinek

Re: error retrieving archives

[Skylar Thompson]

 Content preview:  Is the original filesystem different from the destination
   filesystem? It looks like the destination filesystem is having issues with
the extended attributes TSM has stored for the archived files. On Wed, Aug
23, 2017 at 02:51:34PM -0400, David Jelinek wrote: > 08/23/2017 10:15:58
   ANS1587W Unable to read extended attributes for > object 
/mnt/tsm/linux/aux-jet/shared/data1/20161002/BMW
due to errno: > 34, reason: Numerical result out of range > 08/23/2017 
10:15:58
ANS0361I DIAG: TransErrno: Unexpected error from > psGetXattrNameList, errno
= 34 > > The linux machine I am attempting to retrieve on is not the same
> physical machine, but is the same node name. The retrieve is being done
> from root (the archive was also done from root on the former machine).
   > > Many files retrieve ok I am retrieving to a new location. The retrieve
> command is: > > dsmc retrieve "/shared/data1/*" > 
/mnt/tsm/linux/aux-jet/shared/data1/20161204/
-subdir=yes > -tod=12/31/2016 -fromdate=11/08/2016 > > The directories are
shared out from the original box to a number of system. > > Is there any
   way for me to retrieve these files? > > > -- > Have a wonderful day, > David
Jelinek [...]

 Content analysis details:   (0.7 points, 5.0 required)

  pts rule name  description
  -- --
  0.7 SPF_NEUTRALSPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
 -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVDEnvelope sender domain matches handover relay 
domain
X-Barracuda-Connect: mx.gs.washington.edu[128.208.8.134]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1503514803
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
X-Barracuda-URL: https://148.100.49.28:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 1404
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at marist.edu
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 
QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.5 tests=
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.42237
Rule breakdown below
 pts rule name  description
 -- 
--

Is the original filesystem different from the destination filesystem? It
looks like the destination filesystem is having issues with the extended
attributes TSM has stored for the archived files.

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 02:51:34PM -0400, David Jelinek wrote:
> 08/23/2017 10:15:58 ANS1587W Unable to read extended attributes for
> object /mnt/tsm/linux/aux-jet/shared/data1/20161002/BMW due to errno:
> 34, reason: Numerical result out of range
> 08/23/2017 10:15:58 ANS0361I DIAG: TransErrno: Unexpected error from
> psGetXattrNameList, errno = 34
>
> The linux machine I am attempting to retrieve on is not the same
> physical machine, but is the same node name. The retrieve is being done
> from root (the archive was also done from root on the former machine).
>
> Many files retrieve ok I am retrieving to a new location. The retrieve
> command is:
>
> dsmc retrieve "/shared/data1/*"
> /mnt/tsm/linux/aux-jet/shared/data1/20161204/ -subdir=yes
> -tod=12/31/2016 -fromdate=11/08/2016
>
> The directories are shared out from the original box to a number of system.
>
> Is there any way for me to retrieve these files?
>
>
> --
> Have a wonderful day,
> David Jelinek

--
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine

Re: Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Erwann!
I received the same error even when I selected only the API for installation!
Anyway, I managed to upgrade 7.1.1.0 to 7.1.2.0 by using yum instead of rpm. 
It's working now.
Thanks for your reply!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann 
SIMON
Sent: dinsdag 21 april 2015 15:00
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

Hello Eric,

TIVsm-filepath contains a kernel module used by tsmjbbd (TIVsm-JBB) and each is 
specific to a kernel version.

If you're not using tsmjbbd, you simply don't need those packages (TIVsm-JBB 
and TIVsm-filepath)

-- 
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

- Mail original -
De: "EJ van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" 
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mardi 21 Avril 2015 10:33:37
Objet: [ADSM-L] Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

Hi TSM-ers!
Has anybody been able to upgrade their 7.1 Linux client to 7.1.2.0 on RedHat 5? 
When I try to upgrade it I receive the following error:

error: Failed dependencies:
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 is needed by 
TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64

Which seems to indicate that the files where build with a higher rpm release 
that the one on RedHat 5...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

[Erwann SIMON]

Hello Eric,

TIVsm-filepath contains a kernel module used by tsmjbbd (TIVsm-JBB) and each is 
specific to a kernel version.

If you're not using tsmjbbd, you simply don't need those packages (TIVsm-JBB 
and TIVsm-filepath)

-- 
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

- Mail original -
De: "EJ van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" 
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mardi 21 Avril 2015 10:33:37
Objet: [ADSM-L] Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

Hi TSM-ers!
Has anybody been able to upgrade their 7.1 Linux client to 7.1.2.0 on RedHat 5? 
When I try to upgrade it I receive the following error:

error: Failed dependencies:
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 is needed by 
TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64

Which seems to indicate that the files where build with a higher rpm release 
that the one on RedHat 5...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Re: Error Activepool-file

[David Bronder]

Or, in the admin cli, "help ANR0185E" (or whatever message code).  Saves a
trip to the Messages guide.

Mickael, I haven't worked with active data pools yet, but from the
documentation, it looks like you don't have the ACTIVEPOOL-FILE storage pool
listed in the ACTIVEDESTination (Active Data Pool List) for your policy
domain(s) used by the nodes storing data in TAPEPOOL.

You can add the active pool to the list for the domain(s) with the command
"UPDate DOmain domain_name ACTIVEDESTination=ACTIVEPOOL-FILE" (fill in the
domain name, repeat command if multiple domains have nodes using that pool;
if you have multiple active data pools used by nodes in the domain, you must
include each active data pool name in the ACTIVEDESTination list).

=Dave


On 01/13/2014 04:53 AM, Michael Roesch wrote:

Hi,

the error message says it: the pool is not defined in any domain.


Mickael,

Btw, you can search for the error message code and you'll find the answer:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.itsm.messages.doc%2Fmsgs77.html

Regards,
Michael



On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:27 AM, mik  wrote:


Hi evebody,

Before i have a tsm server 5.5 and now i installed a tsm server 6.3.

I have configured the new tsm like the old and put the same maintenance
script but i have a error



ANR2017I L'administrateur ADMIN a lanci la commande : COPY ACTIVEDATA

tapepool

activepool-file wait=yes
ANR0185E Impossible de copier les donnies de TAPEPOOL vers

ACTIVEPOOL-FILE. Le

pool de donnZes actives n'est pas difini sur un domaine.
ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):ANR0185E Impossible de copier les
ANR1463E RUN : l'exicution du script MAINTENANCE_TSM a giniri une

erreur.ANR2753

I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):donnies de TAPEPOOL vers ACTIVEPOOL-FIL
ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):E. Le pool de donnies actives n'est pas
ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):difini sur un domaine.
ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):ANR1463E RUN : l'exicution du script
ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):MAINTENANCE_TSM a giniri une erreur.
ANR2752E Echec de la commande planifiie MAINTENANCE_TSM.



What the problem please ?

Regards, Mickael.

+--
|This was sent by bobpatrick808...@yahoo.fr via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--



--
Hello World.David Bronder - Systems Architect
Segmentation Fault  ITS-EI, Univ. of Iowa
Core dumped, disk trashed, quota filled, soda warm.   david-bron...@uiowa.edu

Re: Error Activepool-file

[Michael Roesch]

Hi,

the error message says it: the pool is not defined in any domain.

Btw, you can search for the error message code and you'll find the answer:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.itsm.messages.doc%2Fmsgs77.html

Regards,
Michael



On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:27 AM, mik  wrote:

> Hi evebody,
>
> Before i have a tsm server 5.5 and now i installed a tsm server 6.3.
>
> I have configured the new tsm like the old and put the same maintenance
> script but i have a error
>
>
> > ANR2017I L'administrateur ADMIN a lanci la commande : COPY ACTIVEDATA
> tapepool
> > activepool-file wait=yes
> > ANR0185E Impossible de copier les donnies de TAPEPOOL vers
> ACTIVEPOOL-FILE. Le
> > pool de donnZes actives n'est pas difini sur un domaine.
> > ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):ANR0185E Impossible de copier les
> > ANR1463E RUN : l'exicution du script MAINTENANCE_TSM a giniri une
> erreur.ANR2753
> > I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):donnies de TAPEPOOL vers ACTIVEPOOL-FIL
> > ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):E. Le pool de donnies actives n'est pas
> > ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):difini sur un domaine.
> > ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):ANR1463E RUN : l'exicution du script
> > ANR2753I (MAINTENANCE_TSM):MAINTENANCE_TSM a giniri une erreur.
> > ANR2752E Echec de la commande planifiie MAINTENANCE_TSM.
>
>
> What the problem please ?
>
> Regards, Mickael.
>
> +--
> |This was sent by bobpatrick808...@yahoo.fr via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
> +--
>

Re: error enumerating items in mailbox

[Stackwick, Stephen]

Del, I'll probably have to eventually, but the admins are still working with 
the RDB to extract the mailbox with another tool. If that fails, too, as I 
suspect it will, that will kind of rule out TSM and point to a 
configuration/permissions problem.

Thanks,

Steve

STEPHEN STACKWICK | Senior Consultant | 301.518.6352 (m) | 
stephen.stackw...@icfi.com | icfi.com
ICF INTERNATIONAL | 410 E. Pratt Street Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 | 
410.539.1135 (o)


> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf
> Of Del Hoobler
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:03 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] error enumerating items in mailbox
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> It's difficult to know from the description below.
> Can you open a PMR? Support can get the traces and pinpoint the issue.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Del
> 
> 
> 
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 10/22/2013
> 04:14:11 PM:
> 
> > From: "Stackwick, Stephen" 
> > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> > Date: 10/22/2013 04:15 PM
> > Subject: error enumerating items in mailbox Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor
> > Manager" 
> >
> > W2K8
> > Exchange 2010 SP1
> > TDP and client at 6.4.1
> >
> > We're trying to restore a mailbox. The Recovery Database gets created,
> > the correct Exchange DB gets restored into it, then the "March of the
> > Errors" begins. For every mailbox in the restored DB, I get a popup
> > telling me of the mailbox name and that there was an "error
> > enumerating items in mailbox".
> >
> > We just did this last month, it worked fine and we've not upgraded the
> > TSM or Exchange code. Sounds like a permissions error to me, but the
> > user is in the proper Exchange Org. Mgmt group. Any have any ideas
> > before we move on to support?
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > STEPHEN STACKWICK | Senior Consultant | 301.518.6352 (m) |
> > stephen.stackw...@icfi.com | icfi.com<
> > http://www.icfi.com/> ICF INTERNATIONAL | 410 E. Pratt Street Suite
> > 2214, Baltimore, MD
> > 21202 | 410.539.1135 (o)
> >

Re: error enumerating items in mailbox

[Del Hoobler]

Hi Steve,

It's difficult to know from the description below.
Can you open a PMR? Support can get the traces
and pinpoint the issue.

Thanks,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 10/22/2013
04:14:11 PM:

> From: "Stackwick, Stephen" 
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> Date: 10/22/2013 04:15 PM
> Subject: error enumerating items in mailbox
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> W2K8
> Exchange 2010 SP1
> TDP and client at 6.4.1
>
> We're trying to restore a mailbox. The Recovery Database gets
> created, the correct Exchange DB gets restored into it, then the
> "March of the Errors" begins. For every mailbox in the restored DB,
> I get a popup telling me of the mailbox name and that there was an
> "error enumerating items in mailbox".
>
> We just did this last month, it worked fine and we've not upgraded
> the TSM or Exchange code. Sounds like a permissions error to me, but
> the user is in the proper Exchange Org. Mgmt group. Any have any
> ideas before we move on to support?
>
> Steve
>
> STEPHEN STACKWICK | Senior Consultant | 301.518.6352 (m) |
> stephen.stackw...@icfi.com | icfi.com<
> http://www.icfi.com/>
> ICF INTERNATIONAL | 410 E. Pratt Street Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD
> 21202 | 410.539.1135 (o)
>

Re: Error when installing TSM client on RHES 5.7

[Paul_Dudley]

Thanks Grant - I will keep that info for future reference however I got around 
it by installing a later version of the client (5.5.4).


Thanks & Regards
Paul


-Original Message-
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error when installing TSM client on RHES 5.7

yum whatprovides */libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 yum whatprovides */libXp.so.6

will tell you what is missing.

HTH

Grant

On 13/09/12 11:43, Paul_Dudley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am trying to install the TSM client on Red Hat linux version ES 5.7. 
> TIVsm-API-5.2.0-0 has installed OK via the rpm command however I have run 
> into the problem below:
>
>
>
> rpm -i TIVsm-BA.i386.rpm
>
> error: Failed dependencies:
>
>  libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 is needed by TIVsm-BA-5.2.0-0.i386
>
>  libXp.so.6 is needed by TIVsm-BA-5.2.0-0.i386
>
>
>
> Any suggestions? I assume there are some other linux packages I have to 
> install?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks&  Regards
> Paul
>





ANL - Regional Carrier of the Year 2011 - Containerisation International

ANL DISCLAIMER

This e-mail and any file attached is confidential, and intended solely to the 
named add
ressees. Any unauthorised dissemination or use is strictly prohibited. If you 
received
this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail 
from your s
ystem. Please do not copy, use or make reference to it for any purpose, or 
disclose its
 contents to any person.

Re: Error when installing TSM client on RHES 5.7

[Grant Street]

yum whatprovides */libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
yum whatprovides */libXp.so.6

will tell you what is missing.

HTH

Grant

On 13/09/12 11:43, Paul_Dudley wrote:

Hi all,



I am trying to install the TSM client on Red Hat linux version ES 5.7. 
TIVsm-API-5.2.0-0 has installed OK via the rpm command however I have run into 
the problem below:



rpm -i TIVsm-BA.i386.rpm

error: Failed dependencies:

 libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 is needed by TIVsm-BA-5.2.0-0.i386

 libXp.so.6 is needed by TIVsm-BA-5.2.0-0.i386



Any suggestions? I assume there are some other linux packages I have to install?





Thanks&  Regards

Paul



Paul Dudley

IT Operations

ANL Container Line

pdud...@anl.com.au







ANL - Regional Carrier of the Year 2011 - Containerisation International

ANL DISCLAIMER

This e-mail and any file attached is confidential, and intended solely to the 
named add
ressees. Any unauthorised dissemination or use is strictly prohibited. If you 
received
this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail 
from your s
ystem. Please do not copy, use or make reference to it for any purpose, or 
disclose its
  contents to any person.

Re: Error ANS0106E

[Erwann SIMON]

Hi Robert,

I assume that your clients are Windows.

It's generally an upgrade problem. It can happen when the TSM services 
(scheduler)are not shut down. It's'probably due to a corrupted dscenu.txt

There is a simple fix : copy the dscenu.txt file from a machime without the 
problem. the other way is to uninstall and then reinstall the client.

Note that this does not apply specifically to 6.3, so your problem may be 
different.
 
--Message d'origine--
De: Robert Ouzen
Expéditeur : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Répondre à: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Objet: [ADSM-L] Error ANS0106E
Envoyé: 15 nov. 2011 07:13

Hi to all

I have some clients after upgrading to Client version 6.3.0 showing this 
message:

tsm> i -su=yes

Incremental backup of volume '\\websrv02\c$'

Incremental backup of volume '\\websrv02\d$'

Incremental backup of volume '\\websrv02\e$'

Incremental backup of volume '\\websrv02\f$'

Incremental backup of volume 'SYSTEMSTATE'
ANS0106E Message index not found for message 1793.
ANS0106E Message index not found for message 1793.

The backup still works but how can I fix this message , any clue ?

My TSM server version is: 6.2.3.0

Regards

Robert


--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

Re: Error: Unable to open drive issue

[Moyer, Joni M]

Hi Andy,

Yeah, the device is actually the c64t0l0 and it's been that way for years, so 
that part hasn't changed, but thanks so much for the tip!

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 12:34 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error: Unable to open drive issue

Do you have the correct rmt path to the drive?  If there are 2 drives and the 
rmt's are reversed it will give the error you have.

For us we have /dev/rmt43 for AIX and c80t0l0 for the NAS in the path 
definitions to 1 drive.


Andy Huebner


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Moyer, 
Joni M
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 11:23 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error: Unable to open drive issue

Hi Everyone,

I am trying to do an NDMP backup with device c64t0l0 from a TSM 5.5.5.0 server 
on AIX 5.3 and I am getting the following.  This is for an LTO2 drive in an 
Oracle SL8500.  We have replaced the drive, replaced the tray and changed the 
cable to the drive without success.

Any suggestions on what this issue might be?  I'm at a loss and have tried 
everything that I can think of.

Thanks in advance!

Date/Time Message
  --
06/23/11 11:56:35 ANR0984I Process 528 for BACKUP NAS (DIFFERENTIAL) started
   in the BACKGROUND at 11:56:35. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS:
   528)
06/23/11 11:56:35 ANR1064I Differential backup of NAS node NAS_SERVER_2,
   file system /opensys_bkup, started as process 528 by
   administrator LIDZR8V. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 11:56:35 ANR0609I BACKUP NODE started as process 528. (SESSION:
   1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:03:13 ANR8779E Unable to open drive c64t0l0, error number=2.
   (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:03:38 ANR1401W Mount request denied for volume N00571 - mount
   failed. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:10:10 ANR8779E Unable to open drive c64t0l0, error number=2.
   (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:10:35 ANR1401W Mount request denied for volume N00571 - mount
   failed. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:12:12 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY
   ACTLOG search="process: 528"  (SESSION: 1662)
06/23/11 12:17:24 ANR8779E Unable to open drive c64t0l0, error number=2.
   (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR8945W Scratch volume mount failed N07826. (SESSION:
   1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR1404W Scratch volume mount request denied - mount
   failed. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR1096E NAS Backup process 528 terminated - storage media
   inaccessible. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR0985I Process 528 for BACKUP NAS (DIFFERENTIAL) running
   in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE
   at 12:17:58. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)


This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended solely 
for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then 
delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, 
disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. 
The views expressed in this e-mail message do not necessarily represent the 
views of Highmark Inc., its subsidiaries, or affiliates.

This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized 
representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying 
or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments.

Thank you.

Re: Error: Unable to open drive issue

[Strand, Neil B.]

Since you replaced the drive, the WWPN may also have changed.  Verify
the SAN zoning is still valid.


EFFECTIVE 7/16/2011, MY NEW PHONE NUMBER AND ADDRESS WILL BE:
410-454-3372
100 International Drive, Baltimore, MD 21202
Thank you,
Neil Strand
Storage Engineer - Legg Mason
Baltimore, MD.
(410) 580-7491
Whatever you can do or believe you can, begin it.
Boldness has genius, power and magic.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Moyer, Joni M
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 12:23 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error: Unable to open drive issue

Hi Everyone,

I am trying to do an NDMP backup with device c64t0l0 from a TSM 5.5.5.0
server on AIX 5.3 and I am getting the following.  This is for an LTO2
drive in an Oracle SL8500.  We have replaced the drive, replaced the
tray and changed the cable to the drive without success.

Any suggestions on what this issue might be?  I'm at a loss and have
tried everything that I can think of.

Thanks in advance!

Date/Time Message

--
06/23/11 11:56:35 ANR0984I Process 528 for BACKUP NAS (DIFFERENTIAL)
started
   in the BACKGROUND at 11:56:35. (SESSION: 1614,
PROCESS:
   528)
06/23/11 11:56:35 ANR1064I Differential backup of NAS node
NAS_SERVER_2,
   file system /opensys_bkup, started as process 528
by
   administrator LIDZR8V. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS:
528)
06/23/11 11:56:35 ANR0609I BACKUP NODE started as process 528.
(SESSION:
   1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:03:13 ANR8779E Unable to open drive c64t0l0, error
number=2.
   (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:03:38 ANR1401W Mount request denied for volume N00571 -
mount
   failed. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:10:10 ANR8779E Unable to open drive c64t0l0, error
number=2.
   (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:10:35 ANR1401W Mount request denied for volume N00571 -
mount
   failed. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:12:12 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command:
QUERY
   ACTLOG search="process: 528"  (SESSION: 1662)
06/23/11 12:17:24 ANR8779E Unable to open drive c64t0l0, error
number=2.
   (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR8945W Scratch volume mount failed N07826.
(SESSION:
   1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR1404W Scratch volume mount request denied -
mount
   failed. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR1096E NAS Backup process 528 terminated -
storage media
   inaccessible. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR0985I Process 528 for BACKUP NAS (DIFFERENTIAL)
running
   in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state
FAILURE
   at 12:17:58. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)


This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended
solely for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without
the author's prior permission. The views expressed in this e-mail
message do not necessarily represent the views of Highmark Inc., its
subsidiaries, or affiliates.

IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason 
therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive 
information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, 
account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely 
delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends 
that you do not send time sensitive 
or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.

This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not 
use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If 
you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying 
to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.

Re: Error: Unable to open drive issue

[Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT]

Do you have the correct rmt path to the drive?  If there are 2 drives and the 
rmt's are reversed it will give the error you have.

For us we have /dev/rmt43 for AIX and c80t0l0 for the NAS in the path 
definitions to 1 drive.


Andy Huebner


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Moyer, 
Joni M
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 11:23 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error: Unable to open drive issue

Hi Everyone,

I am trying to do an NDMP backup with device c64t0l0 from a TSM 5.5.5.0 server 
on AIX 5.3 and I am getting the following.  This is for an LTO2 drive in an 
Oracle SL8500.  We have replaced the drive, replaced the tray and changed the 
cable to the drive without success.

Any suggestions on what this issue might be?  I'm at a loss and have tried 
everything that I can think of.

Thanks in advance!

Date/Time Message
  --
06/23/11 11:56:35 ANR0984I Process 528 for BACKUP NAS (DIFFERENTIAL) started
   in the BACKGROUND at 11:56:35. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS:
   528)
06/23/11 11:56:35 ANR1064I Differential backup of NAS node NAS_SERVER_2,
   file system /opensys_bkup, started as process 528 by
   administrator LIDZR8V. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 11:56:35 ANR0609I BACKUP NODE started as process 528. (SESSION:
   1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:03:13 ANR8779E Unable to open drive c64t0l0, error number=2.
   (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:03:38 ANR1401W Mount request denied for volume N00571 - mount
   failed. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:10:10 ANR8779E Unable to open drive c64t0l0, error number=2.
   (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:10:35 ANR1401W Mount request denied for volume N00571 - mount
   failed. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:12:12 ANR2017I Administrator LIDZR8V issued command: QUERY
   ACTLOG search="process: 528"  (SESSION: 1662)
06/23/11 12:17:24 ANR8779E Unable to open drive c64t0l0, error number=2.
   (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR8945W Scratch volume mount failed N07826. (SESSION:
   1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR1404W Scratch volume mount request denied - mount
   failed. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR1096E NAS Backup process 528 terminated - storage media
   inaccessible. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)
06/23/11 12:17:58 ANR0985I Process 528 for BACKUP NAS (DIFFERENTIAL) running
   in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE
   at 12:17:58. (SESSION: 1614, PROCESS: 528)


This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended solely 
for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then 
delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, 
disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. 
The views expressed in this e-mail message do not necessarily represent the 
views of Highmark Inc., its subsidiaries, or affiliates.

This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized 
representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying 
or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments.

Thank you.

Re: Error installing 6.2.0.0 server license

[Thomas Denier]

I managed to resolve my problems. While I was waiting to hear from IBM,
I did some research on Ant (an open source product used in the TSM
installer) and started looking at XML configuration files. I eventually
realized that all the installer was really supposed to do was to execute
two rpm commands: one with the '-e' option to remove any existing
license package, and the other with '-i' to install the new license
package. I executed the latter command manually.

When I tried to install the 6.2.2.0 TSM server I got errors similar to
those from the original attempt to install the license file. Executing
Linux commands myself was not a workable approach: the installation of
the TSM server itself and most of its prerequisites involved nothing
more than rpm commands, but the DB2 install was vastly more complex.

While I was waiting to hear from IBM I tried the server install again
with '-i console' rather the '-i silent' on the off chance of getting
better diagnostic messages. I did in fact get a useful message. The
installer needs, or thinks it needs, both 32 and 64 bit versions of
libstdc++.so.5 (the 'Server Installation Guide' only mentions
libstdc++.so.6, with no information on 32 bit versus 64 bit versions).
Once the system administrator installed the 32 bit version of the
older library, the server installation worked.

Re: Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

[Pawlos Gizaw]

It seems xterm issue, just make sure you set your display. Run the following 
cmd on the Linux windows, the hostname is the ip address of your local machine.


Export Display=hostname:0.0 

Pawlos

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of ashish 
sharma
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

Hello Pawlos,

Thankd for your help information . In the afternoon i checked with my system 
admin and it came out that he did a bad job!!. In spite of me specifying all 
the libraries as stated in installation guide , he skippe the one much needed. 
Not i dont have the error as i stated yesterday but now the problem is a second 
one.When i run the following script on my system

/opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dsmicfgx


I get the below error and installer fails:

"Installer User Interface Mode Not Supported The installer cannot run in this 
UI mode. To specify the interface mode, use the -i command-line option, 
followed by the UI mode identifier. The valid UI modes identifiers are GUI, 
Console, and Silent. "


I have used all the three modes but still the installed fails. Any ideas  
anybody





On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Pawlos Gizaw < pawlos.gi...@sanofi-aventis.com> 
wrote:

> Below are the libraries needed to be installed on  Linux,  I am 
> running RH enterprise 5.5 6.4 bit. You should get these libraries from the OS 
> media.
> Once you install them, you need to make sure you uninstall all TSM 
> server components before trying reinstall the server again.
>
> Pawlos
>
> rpm -qa|grep compat-libstdc++
>
> compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61
>
> compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-138
>
> compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf 
> Of ashish sharma
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:59 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>  Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux
>
> Hello Pawlo,
>
> Which all three libstd you are speaking about? Can you please clearly 
> specify there name so that i can download them from net and install.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Pawlos Gizaw < 
> pawlos.gi...@sanofi-aventis.com> wrote:
>
> > Ashish,
> >
> > I had the same issue, please check if you have compat-libstdcc++(all
> > 3) libraries, if you don't have please install it and try the 
> > installer
> again.
> >
> > Palwos
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On 
> > Behalf Of ashish sharma
> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:47 AM
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: [ADSM-L] Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > While installation TSM 6.2 server on Linux machine, i am getting the 
> > below
> > error:
> >
> >
> > Aborting installer: XML document structures must start and end 
> > within the same entity. (from
> > com.ibm.ac.coi.ext.ia.plugin.COIProcessInventorySteps.install)
> >
> > I am using GUI for installation and doing it remotely . Can anyone 
> > please help me on the issue.
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Ashish Sharma
> > ST Microelectronics Ltd.
> > 919717003853
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Ashish Sharma
> ST Microelectronics Ltd.
> 919717003853
>



--
Best Regards
Ashish Sharma
ST Microelectronics Ltd.
919717003853

Re: Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

[ashish sharma]

Hello Pawlos,

Thankd for your help information . In the afternoon i checked with my system
admin and it came out that he did a bad job!!. In spite of me specifying all
the libraries as stated in installation guide , he skippe the one much
needed. Not i dont have the error as i stated yesterday but now the problem
is a second one.When i run the following script on my system

/opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dsmicfgx


I get the below error and installer fails:

"Installer User Interface Mode Not Supported
The installer cannot run in this UI mode. To specify the interface mode, use
the -i command-line option, followed by the UI mode identifier. The valid UI
modes identifiers are GUI, Console, and Silent. "


I have used all the three modes but still the installed fails. Any ideas
 anybody





On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Pawlos Gizaw <
pawlos.gi...@sanofi-aventis.com> wrote:

> Below are the libraries needed to be installed on  Linux,  I am running RH
> enterprise 5.5 6.4 bit. You should get these libraries from the OS media.
> Once you install them, you need to make sure you uninstall all TSM server
> components before trying reinstall the server again.
>
> Pawlos
>
> rpm -qa|grep compat-libstdc++
>
> compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61
>
> compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-138
>
> compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
> ashish sharma
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:59 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>  Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux
>
> Hello Pawlo,
>
> Which all three libstd you are speaking about? Can you please clearly
> specify there name so that i can download them from net and install.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Pawlos Gizaw <
> pawlos.gi...@sanofi-aventis.com> wrote:
>
> > Ashish,
> >
> > I had the same issue, please check if you have compat-libstdcc++(all
> > 3) libraries, if you don't have please install it and try the installer
> again.
> >
> > Palwos
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
> > Of ashish sharma
> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:47 AM
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: [ADSM-L] Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > While installation TSM 6.2 server on Linux machine, i am getting the
> > below
> > error:
> >
> >
> > Aborting installer: XML document structures must start and end within
> > the same entity. (from
> > com.ibm.ac.coi.ext.ia.plugin.COIProcessInventorySteps.install)
> >
> > I am using GUI for installation and doing it remotely . Can anyone
> > please help me on the issue.
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Ashish Sharma
> > ST Microelectronics Ltd.
> > 919717003853
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Ashish Sharma
> ST Microelectronics Ltd.
> 919717003853
>



--
Best Regards
Ashish Sharma
ST Microelectronics Ltd.
919717003853

Re: Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

[Pawlos Gizaw]

Below are the libraries needed to be installed on  Linux,  I am running RH 
enterprise 5.5 6.4 bit. You should get these libraries from the OS media. Once 
you install them, you need to make sure you uninstall all TSM server components 
before trying reinstall the server again.

Pawlos

rpm -qa|grep compat-libstdc++

compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61

compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-138

compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61

 
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of ashish 
sharma
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:59 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

Hello Pawlo,

Which all three libstd you are speaking about? Can you please clearly specify 
there name so that i can download them from net and install.




On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Pawlos Gizaw < pawlos.gi...@sanofi-aventis.com> 
wrote:

> Ashish,
>
> I had the same issue, please check if you have compat-libstdcc++(all 
> 3) libraries, if you don't have please install it and try the installer again.
>
> Palwos
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf 
> Of ashish sharma
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:47 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux
>
> Hello,
>
> While installation TSM 6.2 server on Linux machine, i am getting the 
> below
> error:
>
>
> Aborting installer: XML document structures must start and end within 
> the same entity. (from
> com.ibm.ac.coi.ext.ia.plugin.COIProcessInventorySteps.install)
>
> I am using GUI for installation and doing it remotely . Can anyone 
> please help me on the issue.
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Ashish Sharma
> ST Microelectronics Ltd.
> 919717003853
>



--
Best Regards
Ashish Sharma
ST Microelectronics Ltd.
919717003853

Re: Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

[ashish sharma]

Hello Pawlo,

Which all three libstd you are speaking about? Can you please clearly
specify there name so that i can download them from net and install.




On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Pawlos Gizaw <
pawlos.gi...@sanofi-aventis.com> wrote:

> Ashish,
>
> I had the same issue, please check if you have compat-libstdcc++(all 3)
> libraries, if you don't have please install it and try the installer again.
>
> Palwos
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
> ashish sharma
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:47 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux
>
> Hello,
>
> While installation TSM 6.2 server on Linux machine, i am getting the below
> error:
>
>
> Aborting installer: XML document structures must start and end within the
> same entity. (from
> com.ibm.ac.coi.ext.ia.plugin.COIProcessInventorySteps.install)
>
> I am using GUI for installation and doing it remotely . Can anyone please
> help me on the issue.
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Ashish Sharma
> ST Microelectronics Ltd.
> 919717003853
>



--
Best Regards
Ashish Sharma
ST Microelectronics Ltd.
919717003853

Re: Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

[Richard Sims]

On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:10 AM, ashish sharma wrote:

> Hello Richard,
> 
> The below is the o/p of df -h command and my Packages are located in /var
> directory
> 
> [r...@eulpoc tsm]# df -h
> FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda2 7.6G  2.8G  4.5G  38% /
> /dev/sda7 1.9G  1.2G  657M  65% /opt
> /dev/sda6 4.8G  558M  4.0G  13% /tmp
> /dev/sda5 4.8G  138M  4.4G   4% /home
> /dev/sda3 6.7G  4.6G  1.8G  72% /var
> I have other dedicated location for diskpool, db,log etc.
> 
> Do you suggest i chnage the location of my executables to some otehr place
> and run the command from there?

It's hard to say, in that some installers remove things in a failure, such that 
when you look afterward, it appears that there is space.
(Just as a general thing, be cautious about proceeding with so much of /var 
already used, given that Linux system logging in /var could itself consume 
considerable space.)

Hate to say it, but you may have to contact TSM Support.  I think we all 
expected that by release 2 of version 6, things would be a lot smoother with 
this new version; but things don't seem to be getting better.

 Richard Sims

Re: Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

[Pawlos Gizaw]

Ashish,

I had the same issue, please check if you have compat-libstdcc++(all 3) 
libraries, if you don't have please install it and try the installer again.

Palwos

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of ashish 
sharma
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:47 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

Hello,

While installation TSM 6.2 server on Linux machine, i am getting the below
error:


Aborting installer: XML document structures must start and end within the same 
entity. (from
com.ibm.ac.coi.ext.ia.plugin.COIProcessInventorySteps.install)

I am using GUI for installation and doing it remotely . Can anyone please help 
me on the issue.

--
Best Regards
Ashish Sharma
ST Microelectronics Ltd.
919717003853

Re: Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

[ashish sharma]

Hello Richard,

The below is the o/p of df -h command and my Packages are located in /var
directory

[r...@eulpoc tsm]# df -h
FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 7.6G  2.8G  4.5G  38% /
/dev/sda7 1.9G  1.2G  657M  65% /opt
/dev/sda6 4.8G  558M  4.0G  13% /tmp
/dev/sda5 4.8G  138M  4.4G   4% /home
/dev/sda3 6.7G  4.6G  1.8G  72% /var
 I have other dedicated location for diskpool, db,log etc.

Do you suggest i chnage the location of my executables to some otehr place
and run the command from there?

Regards
Ashish

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Richard Sims  wrote:

> You can search on the error message at
> http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.htmlto
>  find the APAR.
> Did you run out of space in the file system?
>
> Richard Sims
>



--
Best Regards
Ashish Sharma
ST Microelectronics Ltd.
919717003853

Re: Error while installing TSM 6.2 on LInux

[Richard Sims]

You can search on the error message at 
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
 to find the APAR.
Did you run out of space in the file system?

 Richard Sims

Re: Error in sqlserver backups

[Richard Sims]

On Mar 24, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Lee, Gary D. wrote:

> Checked BA manual, the word merge does not appear in the entire manual.  What 
> now?

TDPs employ the TSM API, where return code 45 is an API result documented in 
its manual, along with the interface functions associated with it.
Understanding the API is not as easy as understanding the B/A client, however.

  Richard Sims

Re: Error in sqlserver backups

[Del Hoobler]

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21230975

This is an older problem originally documented in APAR IC33026.

Changing backup management classes
The following message may appear when changing management
classes for backups:
ANS0328E (RC45) The specified objects failed the merge test.
This can be caused when the meta data objects and the data objects
of Data Protection for SQL backups are bound to a different management
 class from previous backups and if the meta data objects
and data objects have different copy destinations (APAR IC33026).
You can workaround this issue by creating a new NODENAME to be
used for all future backups.

Thanks,

Del


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 03/24/2010
03:03:32 PM:

> [image removed]
>
> Error in sqlserver backups
>
> Lee, Gary D.
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 03/24/2010 03:04 PM
>
> Sent by:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Tsm server v5.5.4
> Tdp for sql 5.5.3.
>
> Just figured out the ability to put metadata into a separate
> stgpool.  We also now had a request to move a db backup into a long
> term retention management class.
>
> Added the include statements to dsm.opt, now when attempting the
> full backup for the long term retain, get the following.
>
> 03/24/2010 14:15:40 ACO5436E A failure occurred on stripe number
> (0), rc = 1301
> 03/24/2010 14:15:40 ANS0328E (RC45)   The specified objects failed
> the merge test.
> 03/24/2010 14:15:40 ACO5436E A failure occurred on stripe number
> (0), rc = 1301
> 03/24/2010 14:15:40 ANS0328E (RC45)   The specified objects failed
> the merge test.
> 03/24/2010 14:15:40 Backup of TRACKING_BLACKBOARD failed.
>
> Looked in the tdp for sql manual, ans0328e not found.  Aco3654 says
> check other messages for real error.
> Found ans0328e in the ba command line help, says see test merge
parameters.
>
> Checked BA manual, the word merge does not appear in the entire
> manual.  What now?
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Gary Lee
> Senior System Programmer
> Ball State University
> phone: 765-285-1310
>
>

Re: Error in sqlserver backups

[David McClelland]

This one has appeared on here before:

Search for 'merge test' in here:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21230975

"Changing backup management classes
"The following message may appear when changing management classes for
backups:
ANS0328E (RC45) The specified objects failed the merge test.
This can be caused when the meta data objects and the data objects of Data
Protection for SQL backups are bound to a different management class from
previous backups and if the meta data objects and data objects have
different copy destinations (APAR IC33026). You can workaround this issue by
creating a new NODENAME to be used for all future backups."

/DMc

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Lee, Gary D.
Sent: 24 March 2010 19:04
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error in sqlserver backups

Tsm server v5.5.4
Tdp for sql 5.5.3.

Just figured out the ability to put metadata into a separate stgpool.  We
also now had a request to move a db backup into a long term retention
management class.

Added the include statements to dsm.opt, now when attempting the full backup
for the long term retain, get the following.

03/24/2010 14:15:40 ACO5436E A failure occurred on stripe number (0), rc =
1301
03/24/2010 14:15:40 ANS0328E (RC45)   The specified objects failed the merge
test.
03/24/2010 14:15:40 ACO5436E A failure occurred on stripe number (0), rc =
1301
03/24/2010 14:15:40 ANS0328E (RC45)   The specified objects failed the merge
test.
03/24/2010 14:15:40 Backup of TRACKING_BLACKBOARD failed.

Looked in the tdp for sql manual, ans0328e not found.  Aco3654 says check
other messages for real error.
Found ans0328e in the ba command line help, says see test merge parameters.

Checked BA manual, the word merge does not appear in the entire manual.
What now?

Thanks for the help.

Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

Re: Error in sqlserver backups

[Fred Johanson]

I ran into the same.  My solution was to rename the existing filespace as 
oldmeta and olddata.  I kept those until the new filespaces had been around as 
long as the original retention period.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Lee, 
Gary D.
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:04 PM
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error in sqlserver backups

Tsm server v5.5.4
Tdp for sql 5.5.3.

Just figured out the ability to put metadata into a separate stgpool.  We also 
now had a request to move a db backup into a long term retention management 
class.

Added the include statements to dsm.opt, now when attempting the full backup 
for the long term retain, get the following.

03/24/2010 14:15:40 ACO5436E A failure occurred on stripe number (0), rc = 1301
03/24/2010 14:15:40 ANS0328E (RC45)   The specified objects failed the merge 
test.
03/24/2010 14:15:40 ACO5436E A failure occurred on stripe number (0), rc = 1301
03/24/2010 14:15:40 ANS0328E (RC45)   The specified objects failed the merge 
test.
03/24/2010 14:15:40 Backup of TRACKING_BLACKBOARD failed.

Looked in the tdp for sql manual, ans0328e not found.  Aco3654 says check other 
messages for real error.
Found ans0328e in the ba command line help, says see test merge parameters.

Checked BA manual, the word merge does not appear in the entire manual.  What 
now?

Thanks for the help.

Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 

Re: Error deleting Volume

[Loon, EJ van - SPLXM]

Hi Yudi!!
This definitely looks like a database corruption. You should contact IBM
support.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Yudi Darmadi
Sent: vrijdag 15 januari 2010 11:01
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Error deleting Volume

Hai everyone,

I got a problem with deleting volume process:
ANRD imutil.c(6602): ThreadId <45> Backup object
   0:293015692 not found in Backup.Objects.
(SESSION:
7622,
   PROCESS: 155)
I try to audit the volume with option fix=yes, but still can't work
either.

Few days later the TSM Server crash, try to restore from the latest db
backup, restore completed but the service won't started .
Then try to restore from previous day db backup, restore complete ,
service
can start up, but still there's error like this:
ANR2562I Automatic event record deletion started.
ANR2565I 0 schedules for immediate client actions have been deleted.
ANR2563I Removing event records dated prior to 10/17/2009 00:00:00.
ANR2564I Automatic event record deletion ended - 108 records deleted.
ANRD tb.c(3514): ThreadId <33> >>ERROR Database Page Format: Invalid
sibling for page 13925977, left sibling = 0.
ANRD ThreadId <33> issued message  from:
(33) Context report
(33) Thread AdmActivityLogThread (18) is a parent thread related to: 33
(18) Generating TM Context Report: (struct=tmTxnDesc) (slots=256)
(18) slot -> 159:
(18) Tsn=0:1695, Resurrected=False, InFlight=False, Distributed=False
(18)  Participants=2, summaryVote=Commit
Participant DB: voteReceived=True, ackReceived=False
Participant ADM: voteReceived=True, ackReceived=False
(18) Generating Database Transaction Table Context:
(18)  *** no transactions found ***
(18) Generating SM Context Report:
(18)  *** no sessions found ***
(18) Generating AS Vol Context Report:
(18)  No mounted (or mount in progress) volumes.
(18) Generating ssSession Context Report:
(18)  No storage service sessions active.
(18) Generating ssOpenSeg Context Report:
(18)  No storage service segments found.
(18) Generating BF Copy Control Context Report:
(18)  No global copy control blocks.

(33) AdmLogDeletionThread : ANRD calling thread
(33) Generating TM Context Report: (struct=tmTxnDesc) (slots=256)
(33) slot -> 149:
(33) Tsn=0:1685, Resurrected=False, InFlight=True, Distributed=False
(33)  Participants=2, summaryVote=ReadOnly
Participant DB: voteReceived=False, ackReceived=False
Participant ADM: voteReceived=False, ackReceived=False
(33) Generating Database Transaction Table Context:
(33)  *** no transactions found ***
(33) Generating SM Context Report:
(33)  *** no sessions found ***
(33) Generating AS Vol Context Report:
(33)  No mounted (or mount in progress) volumes.
(33) Generating ssSession Context Report:
(33)  No storage service sessions active.
(33) Generating ssOpenSeg Context Report:
(33)  No storage service segments found.
(33) Generating BF Copy Control Context Report:
(33)  No global copy control blocks.
(33) End Context report
ANR2103I Activity log pruning completed: 4134 records removed.
ANR0408I Session 1 started for server JIEPDWOR101_STA (AIX-RS/6000)
(Tcp/Ip)
for storage agent.
ANR0408I Session 2 started for server PAMA_NOTES_STA (Linux/i386)
(Tcp/Ip)
for
storage agent.
ANR0408I Session 3 started for server JIEPFSPU401_STA (Windows) (Tcp/Ip)
for
storage agent.
ANR2750I Starting scheduled command MIGRATE_DAILY_STOP ( run
migrate_stop ).
ANR2017I Administrator NPP001 issued command: RUN migrate_stop
ANR2017I Administrator NPP001 issued command: UPDATE STGPOOL diskpool
highmig=100
ANR2753I (MIGRATE_DAILY_STOP):ANR2202I Storage pool DISKPOOL
ANR2753I (MIGRATE_DAILY_STOP):updated.
ANR2753I (MIGRATE_DAILY_STOP):ANR1462I RUN: Command script
ANR2753I (MIGRATE_DAILY_STOP):MIGRATE_STOP completed successfully.
ANR2751I Scheduled command MIGRATE_DAILY_STOP completed successfully.
ANR1305I Disk volume P:\DISK02.DSM varied online.
ANR1305I Disk volume P:\DISK05.DSM varied online.
ANR1305I Disk volume P:\DISK01.DSM varied online.
ANR1305I Disk volume P:\DISK03.DSM varied online.
ANR1305I Disk volume P:\DISK04.DSM varied online.
ANR2825I License audit process 2 completed successfully - 23 nodes
audited.
ANR0987I Process 2 for AUDIT LICENSE running in the BACKGROUND processed
23
items with a completion state of SUCCESS at 09:34:52.
ANR0812I Inventory file expiration process 1 completed: examined 3339
objects,
deleting 3177 backup objects, 0 archive objects, 0 DB backup volumes,
and 0
recovery plan files. 0 errors were encountered.
ANR0987I Process 1 for EXPIRATION running in the BACKGROUND processed
3177
items with a completion state of SUCCESS at 09:35:43.
ANR0407I Session 18 started for administrator NPP001 (WebBrowser) (HTTP
127.0.0.1(1849)).
ANR0405I Session 18 ended for administrator NPP001 (WebBrowser).

Storage Management Server for Windows - Version 5, Release 4, Level 3.0

Re: Error in installing Admin center

[Carol Trible]

Hi,
  Could you call IBM support and open a problem for this, so we can get the
logs, and figure out what is failing here.
Thanks,
  Carol

Carol Trible
 IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Development
 tri...@us.ibm.com




tandon.kadamb...@dqentertainment.com

Hi,

Could any one please help me out in solving this.

i am getting error while installing Admin center 5.5.0 at the stage of 90%
completion of install.
this is the error below

2[November 6, 2009 12:10:36 PM IST]

[November 6, 2009 12:10:36 PM IST] Command Exit value is 2

[November 6, 2009 12:10:36 PM IST] System RC = 2

[November 6, 2009 12:10:36 PM IST] ERROR: Unable to determine the
installation state of AdminCenter!

[November 6, 2009 12:10:36 PM IST] Completed step number: 9

[November 6, 2009 12:10:36 PM IST] RC = 2

[November 6, 2009 12:10:36 PM IST] ERROR: Failed to (re)deploy our
component.

[November 6, 2009 12:10:36 PM IST]  Installation failed 

[November 6, 2009 12:10:37 PM IST] Total install time: 2 minutes and 26
seconds.





regards,

Sucharitha.
Disclaimer:
This email message (including attachments if any) may contain privileged,
proprietary, confidential information, which may be exempt from any kind of
disclosure whatsoever and is intended solely for the use of addressee (s).
If you are not the intended recipient, kindly inform us by return e-mail
and also kindly disregard the contents of the e-mail, delete the original
message and destroy any copies thereof immediately. You are notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited unless approved by the sender.

DQ Entertainment (DQE) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize
the risk of transmission of computer viruses with this e-mail; DQE is not
liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this
e-mail. DQE shall not be liable for the views expressed in the e-mail. DQE
reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent
to or from this e-mail address

Re: Error backup system state

[Bruno Oliveira]

Now follow these steps. I have 47 GB available on partition where the system
is installed and can not be because of path since he was running up the
system state usually.

2009/9/10 Richard Sims 

> Search on ANS5269E
> at
> http://www-01.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
>



-- 
abs,

Bruno Oliveira
Beagá - MG
(31) 9342-4111

Re: Error backup system state

[Richard Sims]

Search on ANS5269E
at
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html

Re: Error C0000005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:00534E74

[Robert Ouzen Ouzen]

Hi Grigori

I install too the 6.1 client on another machine without any problems , but 
anyway I did your suggestion and now it's working !!!

Thanks a lot

Regards Robert

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:45 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error C005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 
001B:00534E74

Hi,
I have installed TSM Client 6.1 on a few Windows 2003 SP2 servers (32 and 64 
bit) successfully. Clients are working fine.
If you have this problem during 1st start of client:
1) deinstall client;
2) reboot server;
3) install TSM Client again.
Regards,

Grigori G. Solonovitch

Senior Technical Architect

Information Technology  Bank of Kuwait and Middle East  http://www.bkme.com

Phone: (+965) 2231-2274  Mobile: (+965) 99798073  E-Mail: g.solonovi...@bkme.com

Please consider the environment before printing this Email


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Robert 
Ouzen Ouzen
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:37 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error C005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:00534E74

Hi to all



Tried to load the TSM client version 6.1.0 on a Windows 2003 sp2 and got the 
following error:



2009/04/22 10:24:25

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager

Version: 6.1.0.00

Build date:  Tue Mar 17 18:57:27 2009



dsmc.exe caused exception C005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:00534E74



Register dump:

EAX=015A2230  EBX=785B7448  ECX=F9D7FF21  EDX=000A0166  ESI=015A2238

EDI=015A2238  EBP=0001  ESP=0010F64C  EIP=00534E74  FLG=00010246

CS=001B   DS=0023  SS=0023  ES=0023   FS=003B  GS=



Crash dump successfully written to file 'c:\Program 
Files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsmcrash.dmp'



Stack Trace:

001B:00534E74 (0x 0x 0x 0x) dsmc.exe



I look too on event viewer and got this error:



Faulting application dsmc.exe, version 6.1.0.0, faulting module dsmc.exe , 
fault address 0x00134e74



Any ideas what to look for 



Regards



Robert Ouzen

Please consider the environment before printing this Email.

"This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain 
confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named 
recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are not the 
named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the sender 
immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this communication and 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due 
to viruses, any other defects, interception or unauthorized modification. The 
information, views, opinions and comments of this message are those of the 
individual and not necessarily endorsed by BKME."

Re: Error C0000005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:00534E74

[Grigori Solonovitch]

Hi,
I have installed TSM Client 6.1 on a few Windows 2003 SP2 servers (32 and 64 
bit) successfully. Clients are working fine.
If you have this problem during 1st start of client:
1) deinstall client;
2) reboot server;
3) install TSM Client again.
Regards,

Grigori G. Solonovitch

Senior Technical Architect

Information Technology  Bank of Kuwait and Middle East  http://www.bkme.com

Phone: (+965) 2231-2274  Mobile: (+965) 99798073  E-Mail: g.solonovi...@bkme.com

Please consider the environment before printing this Email


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Robert 
Ouzen Ouzen
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:37 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error C005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:00534E74

Hi to all



Tried to load the TSM client version 6.1.0 on a Windows 2003 sp2 and got the 
following error:



2009/04/22 10:24:25

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager

Version: 6.1.0.00

Build date:  Tue Mar 17 18:57:27 2009



dsmc.exe caused exception C005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:00534E74



Register dump:

EAX=015A2230  EBX=785B7448  ECX=F9D7FF21  EDX=000A0166  ESI=015A2238

EDI=015A2238  EBP=0001  ESP=0010F64C  EIP=00534E74  FLG=00010246

CS=001B   DS=0023  SS=0023  ES=0023   FS=003B  GS=



Crash dump successfully written to file 'c:\Program 
Files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsmcrash.dmp'



Stack Trace:

001B:00534E74 (0x 0x 0x 0x) dsmc.exe



I look too on event viewer and got this error:



Faulting application dsmc.exe, version 6.1.0.0, faulting module dsmc.exe , 
fault address 0x00134e74



Any ideas what to look for 



Regards



Robert Ouzen

Please consider the environment before printing this Email.

"This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain 
confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named 
recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are not the 
named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the sender 
immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this communication and 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due 
to viruses, any other defects, interception or unauthorized modification. The 
information, views, opinions and comments of this message are those of the 
individual and not necessarily endorsed by BKME."

Re: Error TSM return code :164

[Andrew Raibeck]

If you do a selective backup of the named file, do you get the same error?

The TSM return code 164 is a direct mapping of the Windows return code
1392.

You can find the meaning of Windows return codes by issuing this command
from a Windows command prompt:

   net helpmsg 

where  is the code, e.g.:

   net helpmsg 1392

Best regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
Level 3 Team Lead
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/i...@ibmus
Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html


The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 03/09/2009
01:04:28 AM:

> [image removed]
>
> Error TSM return code :164
>
> Robert Ouzen Ouzen
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 03/09/2009 01:06 AM
>
> Sent by:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
>
> Hi to all
>
>
>
> I have a Tsm client 5.5.0.4 on a Windows 2003 got a failed backup
> return code=12 and on the dsmerror.log those errors:
>
>
>
>
>
> 08-03-2009 21:40:23 ANS5250E An unexpected error was encountered.
>
>TSM function name : NTSecurityReadV2
>
>TSM function  : CreateFile() returned '1392' for file '\\?
> \GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy125\mysql\data\geo\links.MYD'
>
>
>
>TSM return code   : 164
>
>TSM file  : ntsecurity.cpp (969)
>
> 08-03-2009 21:40:25 ANS5250E An unexpected error was encountered.
>
>TSM function name : NTSecurityReadV2
>
>TSM function  : CreateFile() returned '1392' for file '\\?
> \GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy125\mysql\data\geo\links.MYD'
>
>
>
>TSM return code   : 164
>
>TSM file  : ntsecurity.cpp (969)
>
> 08-03-2009 21:40:25 ANS5250E An unexpected error was encountered.
>
>TSM function name : NTSecurityReadV2
>
>TSM function  : CreateFile() returned '1392' for file '\\?
> \GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy125\mysql\data\geo\links.MYD'
>
>
>
>TSM return code   : 164
>
>TSM file  : ntsecurity.cpp (969)
>
> 08-03-2009 21:40:25 ANS5250E An unexpected error was encountered.
>
>TSM function name : NTSecurityReadV2
>
>TSM function  : CreateFile() returned '1392' for file '\\?
> \GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy125\mysql\data\geo\links.MYD'
>
>
>
>TSM return code   : 164
>
>TSM file  : ntsecurity.cpp (969)
>
> 08-03-2009 21:40:25 ANS5250E An unexpected error was encountered.
>
>TSM function name : NTSecurityReadV2
>
>TSM function  : CreateFile() returned '1392' for file '\\?
> \GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy125\mysql\data\geo\links.MYD'
>
>
>
>TSM return code   : 164
>
>TSM file  : ntsecurity.cpp (969)
>
> 08-03-2009 21:40:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\websrv01\c$\mysql
> \data\geo\links.MYD' failed
>
> 08-03-2009 21:40:29 ANS4023E Error processing '\\websrv01\c$\mysql
> \data\geo\links.MYD': file input/output error
>
> 08-03-2009 21:43:40 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '\\websrv01\c$'
> finished with 1 failure
>
>
>
> 08-03-2009 21:47:52 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'SCHED7W' failed.
> Return code = 12.
>
>
>
> I am logging in this client as an administrator , any ideas 
>
>
>
> Regards Robert

Re: Error TSM return code :164

[Richard Sims]

When you get Windows error codes like that one, perform a Google
search like "windows error 1392".  The error number can be found in
WinError.h, which is ERROR_FILE_CORRUPT, "The file or directory is
corrupted and non-readable".  Check your Windows Event Log for other
applications encountering problems in the file system.  Maybe time for
chkdsk or scandisk or the like.

   Richard Sims

On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:04 AM, Robert Ouzen Ouzen wrote:


TSM function  : CreateFile() returned '1392' for file '\\?
\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy125\mysql\data\geo
\links.MYD'

Re: error renaming node file space

[Conway, Timothy]

 I hate outlook.  Saw that message as top of the list unread - 2 weeks
old.

-Original Message-
From: Conway, Timothy 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:04 PM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] error renaming node file space

That does sometimes happen with odd names (odd for the host OS).  In
that case, the best thing to do is use the fsid for specifying the
original name.  For some reason, it's much more forgiving in specifying
the new name.

ren filesp athens 4 '\\athens\c$_old' namet=fsid
 

Here I fsck with my laptop's main filesystem:

tsm: TSM>ren filesp flatus \\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ c$_old ANR0852E RENAME
FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node FLATUS.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

tsm: TSM>ren filesp flatus 2 '\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ c$_old' namet=fsid 

Do you wish to proceed? (Yes (Y)/No (N)) y ANR0822I RENAME FILESPACE:
Filespace \\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ (fsId=2) successfully renamed to
\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ c$_old for node FLATUS.

tsm: TSM>ren filesp flatus '\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$_old'
'\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$'
ANR0852E RENAME FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node
FLATUS.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

tsm: TSM>ren filesp flatus 2 '\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$' namet=fsid


Do you wish to proceed? (Yes (Y)/No (N)) y ANR0822I RENAME FILESPACE:
Filespace \\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ c$_old (fsId=2) successfully renamed to
\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ for node FLATUS.

tsm: TSM>


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Tim Brown
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] error renaming node file space

Attempting to rename node filespace returns error ??

tsm: TSM533>rename filespace athens  \\athens\c$ \\athens\c$_old
ANR0852E RENAME FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node
ATHENS.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

tsm: TSM533>q fi athens

Node Name   Filespace   FSID Platform Filespace Is Files-
Capacity   Pct
Name  Typepace
(MB)  Util
Unicode?
--- ---   - -
--- -
ATHENS  \\athens\c$4 WinNTNTFS Yes
5,125.6  97.5
ATHENS  \\athens\d$5 WinNTNTFS Yes
10,243.5  25.5
ATHENS  SYSTEM 7 WinNTNTFS Yes
0.0   0.0
 OBJECT
ATHENS  \\athens\e$8 WinNTNTFS Yes
81,916.5  93.4

Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbr...@cenhud.com < mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
 >
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255


This message contains confidential information and is only for the
intended recipient.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
by replying to this note and deleting all copies and attachments.  Thank
you.

Re: error renaming node file space

[Conway, Timothy]

That does sometimes happen with odd names (odd for the host OS).  In
that case, the best thing to do is use the fsid for specifying the
original name.  For some reason, it's much more forgiving in specifying
the new name.

ren filesp athens 4 '\\athens\c$_old' namet=fsid
 

Here I fsck with my laptop's main filesystem:

tsm: TSM>ren filesp flatus \\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ c$_old
ANR0852E RENAME FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node
FLATUS.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

tsm: TSM>ren filesp flatus 2 '\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ c$_old' namet=fsid 

Do you wish to proceed? (Yes (Y)/No (N)) y
ANR0822I RENAME FILESPACE: Filespace \\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ (fsId=2)
successfully renamed to
\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ c$_old for node FLATUS.

tsm: TSM>ren filesp flatus '\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$_old'
'\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$'
ANR0852E RENAME FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node
FLATUS.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

tsm: TSM>ren filesp flatus 2 '\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$' namet=fsid


Do you wish to proceed? (Yes (Y)/No (N)) y
ANR0822I RENAME FILESPACE: Filespace \\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ c$_old (fsId=2)
successfully renamed to
\\lusgr0099v2zlv\c$ for node FLATUS.

tsm: TSM>


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Tim Brown
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] error renaming node file space

Attempting to rename node filespace returns error ??

tsm: TSM533>rename filespace athens  \\athens\c$ \\athens\c$_old
ANR0852E RENAME FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node
ATHENS.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

tsm: TSM533>q fi athens

Node Name   Filespace   FSID Platform Filespace Is Files-
Capacity   Pct
Name  Typepace
(MB)  Util
Unicode?
--- ---   - -
--- -
ATHENS  \\athens\c$4 WinNTNTFS Yes
5,125.6  97.5
ATHENS  \\athens\d$5 WinNTNTFS Yes
10,243.5  25.5
ATHENS  SYSTEM 7 WinNTNTFS Yes
0.0   0.0
 OBJECT
ATHENS  \\athens\e$8 WinNTNTFS Yes
81,916.5  93.4

Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbr...@cenhud.com < mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
 >
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255


This message contains confidential information and is only for the
intended recipient.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
by replying to this note and deleting all copies and attachments.  Thank
you.

Re: error renaming node file space

[Tim Brown]

Thanks !!!

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu]on Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:21 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: error renaming node file space


You'll need the NAMETYPE option to tell the command that the file space
name type is unicode.

Best regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
Level 3 Team Lead
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/i...@ibmus
Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html


The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/04/2009
02:05:09 PM:

> [image removed]
>
> error renaming node file space
>
> Tim Brown
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 02/04/2009 02:07 PM
>
> Sent by:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Attempting to rename node filespace returns error ??
>
> tsm: TSM533>rename filespace athens  \\athens\c$ \\athens\c$_old
> ANR0852E RENAME FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node
ATHENS.
> ANS8001I Return code 11.
>
> tsm: TSM533>q fi athens
>
> Node Name   Filespace   FSID Platform Filespace Is Files-
> Capacity   Pct
> Name  Typepace  (MB)
 Util
> Unicode?
> --- ---   - -
> --- -
> ATHENS  \\athens\c$4 WinNTNTFS Yes5,
> 125.6  97.5
> ATHENS  \\athens\d$5 WinNTNTFS Yes   10,
> 243.5  25.5
> ATHENS  SYSTEM 7 WinNTNTFS Yes  0.0
0.0
>  OBJECT
> ATHENS  \\athens\e$8 WinNTNTFS Yes   81,
> 916.5  93.4
>
> Tim Brown
> Systems Specialist - Project Leader
> Central Hudson Gas & Electric
> 284 South Ave
> Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
> Email: tbr...@cenhud.com < mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com <
mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
> > >
> Phone: 845-486-5643
> Fax: 845-486-5921
> Cell: 845-235-4255
>
>
> This message contains confidential information and is only for the
> intended recipient.  If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
> delivering this message to the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by replying to this note and deleting all copies
> and attachments.  Thank you.

Re: error renaming node file space

[Andrew Raibeck]

You'll need the NAMETYPE option to tell the command that the file space
name type is unicode.

Best regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
Level 3 Team Lead
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/i...@ibmus
Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html


The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/04/2009
02:05:09 PM:

> [image removed]
>
> error renaming node file space
>
> Tim Brown
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 02/04/2009 02:07 PM
>
> Sent by:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Attempting to rename node filespace returns error ??
>
> tsm: TSM533>rename filespace athens  \\athens\c$ \\athens\c$_old
> ANR0852E RENAME FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node
ATHENS.
> ANS8001I Return code 11.
>
> tsm: TSM533>q fi athens
>
> Node Name   Filespace   FSID Platform Filespace Is Files-
> Capacity   Pct
> Name  Typepace  (MB)
 Util
> Unicode?
> --- ---   - -
> --- -
> ATHENS  \\athens\c$4 WinNTNTFS Yes5,
> 125.6  97.5
> ATHENS  \\athens\d$5 WinNTNTFS Yes   10,
> 243.5  25.5
> ATHENS  SYSTEM 7 WinNTNTFS Yes  0.0
0.0
>  OBJECT
> ATHENS  \\athens\e$8 WinNTNTFS Yes   81,
> 916.5  93.4
>
> Tim Brown
> Systems Specialist - Project Leader
> Central Hudson Gas & Electric
> 284 South Ave
> Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
> Email: tbr...@cenhud.com < mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com <
mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
> > >
> Phone: 845-486-5643
> Fax: 845-486-5921
> Cell: 845-235-4255
>
>
> This message contains confidential information and is only for the
> intended recipient.  If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
> delivering this message to the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by replying to this note and deleting all copies
> and attachments.  Thank you.

Re: error ANS5280E ... Please help

[Graham Stewart]

Hello,

I solved the problem by putting a carriage return at the end of the
string.  If you come "DRM" to other keys in FilesNotToBackup you'll see
they all terminate with a carriage return.  I suspect all these
solutions accomplish the same task ...

--
Graham Stewart
Network and Storage Services Manager, Information Technology Services
University of Toronto Libraries
130 St. George Street
Toronto, Ontariograham.stew...@utoronto.ca
Canada   M5S 1A5Phone: 416-978-6337 | Mobile: 416-550-2806 |
Fax: 416-978-1668

PAC Brion Arnaud wrote:

Robert,

This is a known problem who has a simple solution : regedit.
Just point to the key
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesNotToBackup,
then double click on "DRM" to open the key, and immediately close it (no
modification needed) !
Your problem is now solved ...

Cheers.

Arnaud


**
Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland,
CIT Department Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel/CH
Phone: +41 (61) 226 11 11, FAX: +41 (61) 226 17 01
Direct: +41 (61) 226 19 78
e-mail: arnaud.br...@panalpina.com

**


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Robert Ouzen Ouzen
Sent: mercredi 21 janvier 2009 13:27
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: error ANS5280E ... Please help

Hi to all



I have a new issue now baking the systemstate with the error ANS5280E
enumeration from a file set or file listed failed ?



My TSM client is 5.5.1.10 on a Windows 2003 SP2 system.



I search the web for the error ANS5280E and found a paper with
instructions as:



HOW TO REPAIR THE REGISTRY KEY - METHOD 2 This method uses the reg.exe
utility from a Windows OS command prompt.

1. Confirm the invalid DRM data value by running the following command:

reg query
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesNotToBackup /v
DRM


Note: This is one long command even though it might appear in this
article on multiple lines.

The output look will look something like this:

! REG.EXE VERSION 3.0

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesN
otToBackup
DRM REG_MULTI_SZ C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\DRM\* /s\0


The important part is the very last line. Breaking it into 3 parts:

*   DRM is the registry value, and should appear as shown above.

*   REG_MULTI_SZ is the value type. This should also be exactly as
shown above.

*   C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\DRM\* /s\0 is the
interesting part. If it ends with /s\0\0, then it is unaffected (in
which case ANS1009W would not be expected). However, if it ends with
/s\0 as shown above, then it is subject to the ANS1009W message.


2. Use reg.exe to repair the value:

reg add
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesNotToBackup /v
DRM /t REG_MULTI_SZ /d "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\DRM\* /s" /f


Note: This is one long command.

Do not put the \0\0 part in the command. When the value is placed in the
registry, it will automatically be terminated properly.

After running the above command, you can repeat step 1. to confirm that
the data is correct. The data value should now end with /s\0\0

I did on my server but when I run a query I got it without any 0  at all
!!

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesN
otToBackup
DRM REG_MULTI_SZ C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\DRM\* /s

I check in an another server with the same configuration , TSM client
5.5.1.10 windows 2003 SP2 who the systemstate is working fine. There too
when I run the query I got without the 0

Can anybody suggest what I can do to fix this error ANS5280E

T.I.A Advance

Robert







Thanks for any replies!



Rob

Re: error ANS5280E ... Please help

[PAC Brion Arnaud]

Robert,

This is a known problem who has a simple solution : regedit.
Just point to the key
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesNotToBackup,
then double click on "DRM" to open the key, and immediately close it (no
modification needed) !
Your problem is now solved ...

Cheers.

Arnaud


**
Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland,
CIT Department Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel/CH
Phone: +41 (61) 226 11 11, FAX: +41 (61) 226 17 01
Direct: +41 (61) 226 19 78
e-mail: arnaud.br...@panalpina.com

**


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Robert Ouzen Ouzen
Sent: mercredi 21 janvier 2009 13:27
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: error ANS5280E ... Please help

Hi to all

 

I have a new issue now baking the systemstate with the error ANS5280E
enumeration from a file set or file listed failed ?

 

My TSM client is 5.5.1.10 on a Windows 2003 SP2 system.

 

I search the web for the error ANS5280E and found a paper with
instructions as:

 

HOW TO REPAIR THE REGISTRY KEY - METHOD 2 This method uses the reg.exe
utility from a Windows OS command prompt.

1. Confirm the invalid DRM data value by running the following command:

reg query
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesNotToBackup /v
DRM


Note: This is one long command even though it might appear in this
article on multiple lines.

The output look will look something like this:

! REG.EXE VERSION 3.0

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesN
otToBackup
DRM REG_MULTI_SZ C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\DRM\* /s\0


The important part is the very last line. Breaking it into 3 parts:

*   DRM is the registry value, and should appear as shown above.

*   REG_MULTI_SZ is the value type. This should also be exactly as
shown above.

*   C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\DRM\* /s\0 is the
interesting part. If it ends with /s\0\0, then it is unaffected (in
which case ANS1009W would not be expected). However, if it ends with
/s\0 as shown above, then it is subject to the ANS1009W message.


2. Use reg.exe to repair the value:

reg add
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesNotToBackup /v
DRM /t REG_MULTI_SZ /d "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\DRM\* /s" /f


Note: This is one long command.

Do not put the \0\0 part in the command. When the value is placed in the
registry, it will automatically be terminated properly.

After running the above command, you can repeat step 1. to confirm that
the data is correct. The data value should now end with /s\0\0

I did on my server but when I run a query I got it without any 0  at all
!!

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesN
otToBackup
DRM REG_MULTI_SZ C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\DRM\* /s

I check in an another server with the same configuration , TSM client
5.5.1.10 windows 2003 SP2 who the systemstate is working fine. There too
when I run the query I got without the 0

Can anybody suggest what I can do to fix this error ANS5280E

T.I.A Advance

Robert

 

 

 

Thanks for any replies!

 

Rob

Re: error ANS5280E ... Please help

[Richard Sims]

On Jan 21, 2009, at 7:26 AM, Robert Ouzen Ouzen wrote:


Can anybody suggest what I can do to fix this error ANS5280E


The Messages manual explanation advises that this is basically a
herald message for a problem, whose details are to be found in the
dsmerror.log.  I definitely would not mess with the Registry before
fully evaluating all the other information that the supplementary
messages will provide.

  Richard Sims   http://people.bu.edu/rbs

Re: Error running DB2 backups using TSM

[Jacques Van Den Berg]

Hi Lori,

Look in the file /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/sample/dsmrc.h
RC 186 means you don't have an archive copy group.

#define DSM_RC_TL_NOACG186 /* Archive req, no archive copy
group *

Regards,

Jacques van den Berg
TSM / Storage / SAP Basis Administrator
Pick 'n Pay IT
Email   : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel  : +2721 - 658 1711
Fax : +2721 - 658 1676
Mobile  : +2782 - 653 8164 
 
Dis altyd lente in die hart van die mens wat God 
en sy medemens liefhet (John Vianney).
 
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lori Grimaldi
Sent: 03 December 2008 03:15 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error running DB2 backups using TSM

I am trying to run DB2 backups using TSM and I am seeing this in the
db2diag.log:

2008-12-02-15.12.28.668662-300 E115842488A361 LEVEL: Error
PID : 23938TID  : 2199156889936PROC : db2vend
(db2logmgr.meth1 - 43 (P
"/db/db2inst1/db2dump/db2diag.log" 2093516L, 115878129C   2092860,11
99%
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000
EDUID   : 43   EDUNAME: db2logmgr (PWLAN) 0
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgArchiveLogFile,
probe:3108
MESSAGE : Started archive for log file S018.LOG.

2008-12-02-15.13.03.912179-300 E115853025A361 LEVEL: Error
PID : 23938TID  : 2199156889936PROC : db2vend
(db2logmgr.meth1 - 43 (P
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, database utilities, sqluvint, probe:602
DATA #1 : TSM RC, PD_DB2_TYPE_TSM_RC, 4 bytes
TSM RC=0x00BA=186 -- see TSM API Reference for meaning.

2008-12-02-15.13.03.913855-300 E115853387A864 LEVEL: Error
PID : 23893TID  : 2199367182672PROC : db2sysc 0
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000
EDUID   : 43   EDUNAME: db2logmgr (PWLAN) 0
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpInitVendorDevice,
probe:1030
MESSAGE : ZRC=0x86100025=-2045771739=SQLP_MEDIA_VENDOR_DEV_ERR
  "A vendor device reported a media error."
DATA #1 : String, 29 bytes
Init failed!  Vendor rc info:
DATA #2 : Vendor RC, PD_DB2_TYPE_VENDOR_RC, 4 bytes
  2093056,1
99%
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgArchiveLogFile,
probe:3150
MESSAGE : ADM1848W  Failed to archive log file "S005.LOG" to "TSM
chain
0"%
  from
"/db/db2inst1/db2backup/db2inst1/PWLAN/NODE/C000/".

2008-12-02-15.14.35.547958-300 E115877076A568 LEVEL: Error
PID : 23893TID  : 2199367182672PROC : db2sysc 0
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000
EDUID   : 43   EDUNAME: db2logmgr (PWLAN) 0
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgArchiveLogFile,
probe:3160
MESSAGE : ZRC=0x86100025=-2045771739=SQLP_MEDIA_VENDOR_DEV_ERR
  "A vendor device reported a media error."
DATA #1 : 
Failed to archive log file S005.LOG to TSM chain 0
from /db/db2inst1/db2backup/db2inst1/PWLAN/NODE/C000/.

2008-12-02-15.14.35.548035-300 E115877645A484 LEVEL: Warning
PID : 23893TID  : 2199367182672PROC : db2sysc 0
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000
EDUID   : 43   EDUNAME: db2logmgr (PWLAN) 0
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgCleanFailArchPath,
probe:4940
DATA #1 : 
Unable to archive log file 5 from
failarchpath /db/db2inst1/db2backup/db2inst1/PWLAN/NODE/C000/
for
LOGARCHMETH1 due to rc -2045771739.

Any ideas?

Lori G.
Linux on zSeries Team
VM Services Delivery - Information Technology Services Americas, Global
Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux Information?  See http://w3vmlinux.pok.ibm.com
Linux Requests?  Visit our new workload management tool at:
http://linuxonz.pok.ibm.com/service/request

They who give have all things; they who withhold have nothing.

Read our disclaimer at: http://www.picknpay.co.za/pnp/view/pnp/en/page5093? 
If you don't have web access, the disclaimer can be mailed to you on request. 
Disclaimer requests to be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 

Re: error restoring sql db that has full text indexing

[Del Hoobler]

This should work.
Have you tried using the CLI and the "/RELOCATEDir=directory" option?
For example, restoring from server1 to server2, it would be something like
this:
(The following is all one command.)


TDPSQLC RESTORE db1 full /FROMSQLSERVER=server1 /SQLSERVER=server2
/REPLACE /RELOCATEDir=c:\tempdir


If you still have a problem, place a call with IBM support.

Thanks,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 07/31/2008
11:38:30 AM:

> [image removed]
>
> error restoring sql db that has full text indexing
>
> Schaub, Steve
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
>
> 07/31/2008 11:40 AM
>
> Sent by:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Tsm server 5.4
>
> Tsm tdp 5.5.0.0
>
>
>
> Trying to restore a large db from one sql server to another.  I believe
> the errors point to the fact that the original db has 2 full text
> indexes.  I'm trying to use the gui for the restore, I've tried both
> specifying placement for the db/log/other file as well as checking the
> "individual" option.  The help file indicates that these are the options
> to allow a correct restore in this situation but we cant seem to get it
> to work.
>
>
>
> Here is a snip of the log (note that there is no E: drive on the target
> server, so it sounds like it is not respecting my overrides):
>
>
>
> 07/31/2008 11:20:22 Restore of Carekey failed.
>
> 07/31/2008 11:20:22 An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL
> statement or batch.
>
> 07/31/2008 11:20:22 The path 'E:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL
> Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\FTData\Carekey BoardSearch' has invalid attributes.
> It needs to be a directory. It must not be hidden, read-only, or on a
> removable drive.
>
> 07/31/2008 11:20:22 File 'sysft_Carekey BoardSearch' cannot be restored
> to 'E:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\FTData\Carekey
> BoardSearch'. Use WITH MOVE to identify a valid location for the file.
>
> 07/31/2008 11:20:22 The path 'E:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL
> Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\FTData\Carekey ConceptSearch' has invalid
> attributes. It needs to be a directory. It must not be hidden,
> read-only, or on a removable drive.
>
> 07/31/2008 11:20:22 File 'sysft_Carekey ConceptSearch' cannot be
> restored to 'E:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL
> Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\FTData\Carekey ConceptSearch'. Use WITH MOVE to
> identify a valid location for the file.
>
> 07/31/2008 11:20:22 Problems were identified while planning for the
> RESTORE statement. Previous messages provide details.
>
> 07/31/2008 11:20:22 RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve Schaub
>
> Systems Engineer, WNI
>
> BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
>
> 423-535-6574 (desk)
>
> 423-785-7347 (cell)
>
> ***public***
>
> Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of
> Tennessee E-mail disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm

Re: Error 8 establishing TSM API session

[Phillip Burgess]

It sounds like they upgraded the client while the scheduler services were 
running.
 
What I think you need to do is stop the TSM services on that node, then copy 
the tdpdenu.txt file from the c:\tsm_images\TSM for Mail 5416\domino folder 
into the domino TDP folder.
 
You may also have to do the same for the BA client message repository dscenu.txt
 
This should clear the message repository errors,
 
Phil

 


From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/06/2008 23:16
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error 8 establishing TSM API session



We had an issue with a node and it had to be rebuilt. When they
installed the client and domino tdp they used a 5.3 version they had.
When they tried to restore a file the error they got indicated the tsm
version used to archive the file is newer than the one they are using to
restore it. They upgraded the client to 5.4.1.6 and that soled the
retrieve issue but they tell me now the tdp backup is failing and when
they use the client to connect they get the message Error 8 establishing
TSM API session. The client message repository is corrupt or invalid.



Now they tell me that they have uninstalled and reinstalled the client
but still get the same message. I have tried searching the archives but
from where I am connection to adsm.org is suddenly failing. I was hoping
someone had some insight they could pass along.



Thanks for any help you can offer.





Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: error while restoring TSM DB at DR

[Richard Sims]

On Apr 3, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Taylor, David wrote:

I have an automated process for keeping the TSM servers at our DR
site,
in synch with production.  This is a home grown app (mostly Korn
shell)
and it has been working well for several years.  The problem is that
twice in the past week, the restore of the TSM DB at the remote
site has
failed.  Things worked just fine for 5 days between the two incidents.
...


David -

Your TBUNDO096 might be a recurrence of the historic cause you've
probably seen in the IBM database.  If you can minimize activity
during the db backup, and the problem doesn't recur, then that is
likely the cause.  Whereas you are beyond support and can't report
this, I surely hope this is not a current problem in TSM: all of us
do TSM DB backups but few do restorals with any frequency to detect
the prevalence of such an ugly problem.

   Richard Sims

Re: Error when define library path IBM 3576

[James Drozynski]

This has the feeling of a hardware problem OR
scsi interface/drivers/firmware which are not compatible.

Is that combination of hardware/firmware/driver code supported
/up_to_date

I would check on the latest firmware for the library.


James Drozynski
IBM Pittsburgh Lab
11 Stanwix Street
Pittsburgh Pa. 15222
Tel:412-667-4421
Fax:412-667-6975
Tie:989-4421



"Llano, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
02/04/2008 01:36 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] Error when define library path IBM 3576






I have some problems when I want to define library path with a libraty IBM
3576, with Windows 2003 Server and TSM Server 5.3.5.2.

Tsm log error:

ANR8300E I/O error on library IBM_3576 (OP=8401C08C, CC=210, KEY=FF,
ASC=FF, ASCQ=FF, SENSE=**NONE**, Description=The device was reset due to
device power-up, SCSI bus reset, or manual tape load/eject).  Refer to
Appendix D in the 'Messages' manual for recommended
 action. (SESSION: 436)

I didn't find any suggestion in Web

Somebody can help me ??

Regards

Martin A. Llano | EDS South HUB
  | BUR & Storage Services
   | Office: +54.11.5550.2604
  | Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: Error when define library path IBM 3576

[Richard Sims]

What device driver is in use?  Make sure you follow the info in
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&uid=swg21219973

   Richard Sims

Re: Error with a TDP exchange backup on lanFree backup

[Robert Ouzen Ouzen]

Del,

Thanks for your reply , but just now after a lot of debugging I found that two 
tapes was mismatch with serial number and the backup via Lanfree didn't 
recognize the correct device and TSM automatically try to reconfigure the path .

I update the path with the correct number device  (after matching the serial 
number) and everything work now fine

Thanks again

Robert

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Del Hoobler
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 3:58 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error with a TDP exchange backup on lanFree backup

Robert,

rc = 418 means that the Exchange Server is reporting a problem.
Check the TDPEXC.LOG file and the output of the operation. 
It should provide more details on the Exchange Server error code.
You can also check the Windows Event Log on the Exchange Server.

Thanks,

Del




"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 01/20/2008 
11:25:12 PM:

> Hi to all
> 
> 
> 
> I recently got an error message with the backup of a TDP for 
> Exchange (TDP version 5.3.3.1) on Windows 2003. The backup is 
> running with LanFree backup, I have 3 storage group and for only the
> first one (the big one) I got this error message:
> 
> 
> 
> 01/20/2008 23:37:45  ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 37250 
> for nodeEXCHSRV01_DB (TDP MSExchg) - internal server error
> 
>   detected. (SESSION: 37250)
> 
> 01/20/2008 23:37:46  ANE4993E (Session: 37335, Node: EXCHSRV01_DB) 
> TDP MSExchg   ACN3502 Data Protection for Exchange: full backup of
> 
>   First Storage Group from server EXCHSRV01 
> failed, rc = 418. (SESSION: 37335)
> 
> 
> 
> The two others storage group run  fine ….. The first one after 
> several tries success to end correctly 
> 
> 
> 
> 01/21/2008 02:45:46  ANE4991I (Session: 37582, Node: EXCHSRV01_DB) 
> TDP MSExchg  ACN3501 Data Protection for Exchange: full backup of
> 
>   First Storage Group from server EXCHSRV01 
> completed   successfully.155426920798 bytes sent in 8,027.81 seconds.
> 
> 
> 
> During the day I run several Incremental backups via the Lan without
> any error (include the First storage group)
> 
> 
> 
> 01/20/2008 20:02:38  ANE4991I (Session: 37002, Node: EXCHSRV01_DB) 
> TDP MSExchg  ACN3501 Data Protection for Exchange: incr backup of
> 
>   First Storage Group from server EXCHSRV01 
> completed  successfully.1441812356 bytes sent in 153.37 seconds.
> 
> 
> 
> I did some research about the error ANR0530W and one suggestion was 
> to run a full backup via the Lan I did it but still got the error on
> the First storage group ?
> 
> 
> 
> I did also stop and start again the LanFree backup agent to refresh .
> 
> 
> 
> Did anyone suggest me an other approach .
> 
> 
> 
> T.I.A Regards
> 
> 
> 
> Robert Ouzen
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: Error with a TDP exchange backup on lanFree backup

[Del Hoobler]

Robert,

rc = 418 means that the Exchange Server is reporting a problem.
Check the TDPEXC.LOG file and the output of the operation. 
It should provide more details on the Exchange Server error code.
You can also check the Windows Event Log on the Exchange Server.

Thanks,

Del




"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 01/20/2008 
11:25:12 PM:

> Hi to all
> 
> 
> 
> I recently got an error message with the backup of a TDP for 
> Exchange (TDP version 5.3.3.1) on Windows 2003. The backup is 
> running with LanFree backup, I have 3 storage group and for only the
> first one (the big one) I got this error message:
> 
> 
> 
> 01/20/2008 23:37:45  ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 37250 
> for nodeEXCHSRV01_DB (TDP MSExchg) - internal server error
> 
>   detected. (SESSION: 37250)
> 
> 01/20/2008 23:37:46  ANE4993E (Session: 37335, Node: EXCHSRV01_DB) 
> TDP MSExchg   ACN3502 Data Protection for Exchange: full backup of
> 
>   First Storage Group from server EXCHSRV01 
> failed, rc = 418. (SESSION: 37335)
> 
> 
> 
> The two others storage group run  fine ….. The first one after 
> several tries success to end correctly 
> 
> 
> 
> 01/21/2008 02:45:46  ANE4991I (Session: 37582, Node: EXCHSRV01_DB) 
> TDP MSExchg  ACN3501 Data Protection for Exchange: full backup of
> 
>   First Storage Group from server EXCHSRV01 
> completed   successfully.155426920798 bytes sent in 8,027.81 seconds.
> 
> 
> 
> During the day I run several Incremental backups via the Lan without
> any error (include the First storage group)
> 
> 
> 
> 01/20/2008 20:02:38  ANE4991I (Session: 37002, Node: EXCHSRV01_DB) 
> TDP MSExchg  ACN3501 Data Protection for Exchange: incr backup of
> 
>   First Storage Group from server EXCHSRV01 
> completed  successfully.1441812356 bytes sent in 153.37 seconds.
> 
> 
> 
> I did some research about the error ANR0530W and one suggestion was 
> to run a full backup via the Lan I did it but still got the error on
> the First storage group ?
> 
> 
> 
> I did also stop and start again the LanFree backup agent to refresh .
> 
> 
> 
> Did anyone suggest me an other approach .
> 
> 
> 
> T.I.A Regards
> 
> 
> 
> Robert Ouzen
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: Error after installing updated TDPExchange client 5.3.3

[Bos, Karel]

Hi,

Passport advantage site is the site for base level software, including
the TDP's. These base level software packages contian the lic files.

Other way is copying the .lic files from a working client.

Regards,

Karel


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Daniel Lane
Sent: maandag 15 oktober 2007 15:50
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error after installing updated TDPExchange client 5.3.3

Hello Everyone,

I am getting the following error after installing the latest client
version of TDP for Exchange 5.3.3.  The previous client was 5.2.2.  The
file it is looking for is not there.  Does anyone have any ideas on how
to correct this?

ACN0053E License file (E:\Program
Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchange\excclient.lic) could not be opened.
Thank You,
Dan Lane
Systems Administrator
The American Board of Family Medicine, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Email "This email message
and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the American Board of Family
Medicine immediately -- by replying to this message or by sending an
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. If you are not the
intended recipient, you must immediately destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments without reading or disclosing their
contents. Thank you.
For more information regarding the American Board of Family Medicine,
please visit us at https://www.theabfm.org/.";

ÿþDit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan 
geheime informatie bevatten enkel

bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien 
dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd,

verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan 
ons te melden en het bericht te

vernietigen.

Aangezien de integriteit van het 
bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels

verzending via internet, kan Atos 
Origin niet aansprakelijk worden 
gehouden

voor de inhoud daarvan.

Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij 
netwerk te hanteren, geven

wij geen enkele garantie dat dit 
bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden 
wij

enige aansprakelijkheid voor de 
mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in 
dit

bericht.

 

Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, 
aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten 
waaronder

Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten 
levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle

andere voorwaarden de 
Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin 
van toepassing.

Deze worden u op aanvraag direct 
kosteloos toegezonden.

 

This e-mail and the documents attached 
are confidential and intended solely

for the addressee; it may also be 
privileged. If you receive this e-mail

in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and destroy it.

As its integrity cannot be secured on 
the Internet, the Atos Origin group

liability cannot be triggered for the 
message content. Although the

sender endeavours to maintain a 
computer virus-free network, the sender

does not warrant that this transmission 
is virus-free and will not be

liable for any damages resulting from 
any virus transmitted.

 

On all offers and agreements under 
which Atos Origin supplies goods and/or

services of whatever nature, the Terms 
of Delivery from Atos Origin

exclusively apply. 

The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly 
submitted to y

Re: Error after installing updated TDPExchange client 5.3.3

[Daniel Lane]

Hello Everyone,

I am getting the following error after installing the latest client version of 
TDP for Exchange 5.3.3.  The previous client was 5.2.2.  The file it is looking 
for is not there.  Does anyone have any ideas on how to correct this?

ACN0053E License file (E:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchange\excclient.lic) 
could not be opened.
Thank You,
Dan Lane
Systems Administrator
The American Board of Family Medicine, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email
"This email message and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the American Board of 
Family Medicine immediately -- by replying to this message or by sending an 
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you must immediately destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments without reading or disclosing their contents. Thank you.
For more information regarding the American Board of Family Medicine, please 
visit us at https://www.theabfm.org/.";

Re: Error aborts backup, instead of missing a file: right, wrong, indifferent?

[Richard Sims]

On Aug 24, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Allen S. Rout wrote:


On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:16:10 -0400, Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:




I would want to, as wild stuff like this may signal file system
corruption, which I would want called out and addressed ASAP.
Bizarre inode data is scary stuff.  If there is file system
corruption, you definitely don't want further backups sending new
Active files containing useless crud, thus displacing the earlier
versions of the file(s), which may contain good data, which you may
well want for restoral.  At a minimum, I would investigate how those
files entered the file system.



I have the same initial response.  We know how they got there: this is
a computer-science research group's filesystem, and they're writing
stuf shall I say, "unusually" ?  :)


That recalls the movie, "Weird Science".  Good thing they're not in
chemistry.   :-)


But while the discussion goes on about how one ought to write files,
it'd be nice to be able to tell TSM "Carry on".


That brings up the longstanding issue of the TSM Exclude function
having failed to evolve, to cover real-world needs.  There are some
areas in TSM where innovation just doesn't happen, and there the
product remains in the 1980s.  The CLI is a conspicuous example of
this, having remained moribund for many years (and even backward,
like artificially restricting the number of command line filenames to
20).  Exclude has long needed to provide far more flexibility than
TSM Development management has been willing to give it, so that we
can exclude pointless, empty files from backups; or files having a
certain creator name; or files having a specified date range.  And,
in your case, the ability to say to exclude files that are unsound,
and continue on so as not to fail to back up good files that day.

The stagnation in basic functionality of the product is tragic; and
most of that is in the underdeveloped client.  A remarkable
deficiency in the client is to perform a 'dsmc Query Backup', and not
be able to determine something as basic as whether the object is a
file, a directory; or to not have the management class name truncated
to 10 characters because of a lame programming decision someone make
15 years ago.  There's no way to generate useful reports from the
crippled command line client interface (and you can't get any file
detail info at all from server queries).  This is a very sad state of
affairs.  And it's all needless neglect, in no commitment to keep the
CLI modern and relevant, as vitally needed for batch and automated
processing.

   Richard Sims

Re: Error aborts backup, instead of missing a file: right, wrong, indifferent?

[Allen S. Rout]

>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:16:10 -0400, Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:


> I would want to, as wild stuff like this may signal file system
> corruption, which I would want called out and addressed ASAP.
> Bizarre inode data is scary stuff.  If there is file system
> corruption, you definitely don't want further backups sending new
> Active files containing useless crud, thus displacing the earlier
> versions of the file(s), which may contain good data, which you may
> well want for restoral.  At a minimum, I would investigate how those
> files entered the file system.


I have the same initial response.  We know how they got there: this is
a computer-science research group's filesystem, and they're writing
stuf shall I say, "unusually" ?  :)

But while the discussion goes on about how one ought to write files,
it'd be nice to be able to tell TSM "Carry on".


- Allen S. Rout

Re: Error aborts backup, instead of missing a file: right, wrong, indifferent?

[Richard Sims]

On Aug 24, 2007, at 12:57 PM, Allen S. Rout wrote:


we've traced this back to some files which had objectively insane
metadata (negative atime (why does anything interpret that as signed,
anyway?), mtimes after 2038, etc).  So we agree that the files in
question have data which it is not possible to correctly capture.


But we're wondering if it's reasonable to halt processing at this
point. ...


Allen -

I would want to, as wild stuff like this may signal file system
corruption, which I would want called out and addressed ASAP.
Bizarre inode data is scary stuff.  If there is file system
corruption, you definitely don't want further backups sending new
Active files containing useless crud, thus displacing the earlier
versions of the file(s), which may contain good data, which you may
well want for restoral.  At a minimum, I would investigate how those
files entered the file system.

   Richard Sims

Re: Error Message

[Margaret Clark]

Hi John!  Google produces the same question, but no answers.  Which server is 
it?  - Margaret

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/2/2007 8:41 AM >>>
Has anyone seen this message before.  It started showing up multiple times in 
the dsmerror.log.  
(TSAFS.NLM 6.51.5 291) An invalid path was used.  
 
Thanks
 
John Bortscheller
Network Administrator
San Diego Data Processing Corporation
(858) 581-9718
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Re: Error deleting filespace

[LeBlanc, Patricia]

 We're running server version 5.3.3.0.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Henrik Wahlstedt
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:05 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error deleting filespace

Hi,

Which version of TSM are you running? There are some fixes for filespace
deletion. However, if you cant find any usefull information on TSM web
when you are search for 'IM not able to delete object', imutil.c,
Bitfile id not found and imfsdel.c etc I recommend you to open a case
with support.



//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
LeBlanc, Patricia
Sent: den 2 april 2007 20:40
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Error deleting filespace

Has anyone ever encountered errors deleting filespaces?  I have one that
will not delete

Here is the error:
04/02/2007 13:39:48  ANR0802I DELETE FILESPACE /database (fsId=8)
(backup/archive data) for node DEL20070205-SLEEPER started.(SESSION:
340550, PROCESS: 10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANRD imutil.c(6884): ThreadId<112> Bitfile id
0.6104501 not found.(SESSION: 340550, PROCESS: 10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANRD ThreadId<112> issued message  from:
<-0x00010001c240 outDiagf <-0x00010017cb3c ImDeleteBitfile
<-0x000100185670 imDeleteObject  <-0x0001003a6fc0 DeleteBackups
<-0x0001003a7fb4 imFSDeletionThread <-0x0001e9dc StartThread
<-0x09403448 _pthread_body (SESSION: 340550,   PROCESS: 10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANRD imfsdel.c(1827): ThreadId<112> IM not able
to delete object 0.6104501, rc: 19(SESSION: 340550, PROCESS:10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANRD ThreadId<112> issued message  from:
<-0x00010001c240 outDiagf <-0x0001003a7144 DeleteBackups
<-0x0001003a7fb4 imFSDeletionThread <-0x0001e9dc StartThread
<-0x09403448_pthread_body (SESSION: 340550, PROCESS: 10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANR0987I Process 10014 for DELETE FILESPACE running
in the BACKGROUND processed 2 items with a completion state of  FAILURE
at 13:39:49.(SESSION: 340550, PROCESS: 10014)

If it's related to database integrity.how do I fix that?  I can't
audit my db.

Thanks,
pattie


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete this message.
Thank you.

Re: Error deleting filespace

[Henrik Wahlstedt]

Hi,

Which version of TSM are you running? There are some fixes for filespace
deletion. However, if you cant find any usefull information on TSM web
when you are search for 'IM not able to delete object', imutil.c,
Bitfile id not found and imfsdel.c etc I recommend you to open a case
with support.



//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
LeBlanc, Patricia
Sent: den 2 april 2007 20:40
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Error deleting filespace

Has anyone ever encountered errors deleting filespaces?  I have one that
will not delete

Here is the error:
04/02/2007 13:39:48  ANR0802I DELETE FILESPACE /database (fsId=8)
(backup/archive data) for node DEL20070205-SLEEPER started.(SESSION:
340550, PROCESS: 10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANRD imutil.c(6884): ThreadId<112> Bitfile id
0.6104501 not found.(SESSION: 340550, PROCESS: 10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANRD ThreadId<112> issued message  from:
<-0x00010001c240 outDiagf <-0x00010017cb3c ImDeleteBitfile
<-0x000100185670 imDeleteObject  <-0x0001003a6fc0 DeleteBackups
<-0x0001003a7fb4 imFSDeletionThread <-0x0001e9dc StartThread
<-0x09403448 _pthread_body (SESSION: 340550,   PROCESS: 10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANRD imfsdel.c(1827): ThreadId<112> IM not able
to delete object 0.6104501, rc: 19(SESSION: 340550, PROCESS:10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANRD ThreadId<112> issued message  from:
<-0x00010001c240 outDiagf <-0x0001003a7144 DeleteBackups
<-0x0001003a7fb4 imFSDeletionThread <-0x0001e9dc StartThread
<-0x09403448_pthread_body (SESSION: 340550, PROCESS: 10014)
04/02/2007 13:39:49  ANR0987I Process 10014 for DELETE FILESPACE running
in the BACKGROUND processed 2 items with a completion state of  FAILURE
at 13:39:49.(SESSION: 340550, PROCESS: 10014)

If it's related to database integrity.how do I fix that?  I can't
audit my db.

Thanks,
pattie


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Steven Harris]

Two possibilities Thomas.

Is /tmp symlinked to /var/tmp?  The problem may not be where you think
it is.
I have known for AIX filesystems to fill up but there be no file or
files big enough to cause the problem.  In Unix, if a file that is open
is deleted, the directory entry pointing to the file is deleted, but the
file itself does not disappear until it is closed.  Use lsof to see what
is open.

Regards

Steve

Steven Harris
AIX and TSM Admin, Brisbane Australia


Thomas Denier wrote:

-Bill Kelly wrote: -



Is it not possible that the /var filesystem *sometimes* has too
little space available? After all, didn't you say that this only
fails roughly every one to two weeks? Perhaps the failures coincide
with some other activity (possibly unrelated to TSM) that
temporarily eats up most/all of the available space in /var?
Dumps?  Logs?  Something else?



That scenario is essentially impossible to disprove conclusively,
but it doesn't look very promising as an explanation. The Linux
system is dedicated to running the TSM server and some monitoring
and automation functions for the server. We have been able to
check the free space in /var within an hour of most of the
occurances of the write failure. Dumps or log files that filled
up /var would probably have still been around when we checked
free space. There are no cron jobs that clean up files in /var,
and all the people who could have removed such files know I aminvestigating
the write failures.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Henrik Wahlstedt]

 
Hi,

Cowen is probably right. The problem might be "At what rate do you
create/delete these during the night?" 

TSM (5.3.4.2) have a timing issue regarding a fast update rate of
volhist.out. And will get a 
lock for about an hour until it continue its processing. 
In my case I was deleting old copypool volumes with a macro, del vol
discadd=y wait=y'.

05-03-2007 13:02:37  ANR2017I Administrator issued command: DELETE
VOLUME 
 001535 discardd=y wait=y  (SESSION: 1) 
05-03-2007 13:02:37  ANR0984I Process 204 for DELETE VOLUME (DISCARD
DATA) 
 started in the FOREGROUND at 13:02:37.
(SESSION: 1,  
 PROCESS: 204)

05-03-2007 14:03:02  ANR0538I A resource waiter has been aborted.

05-03-2007 14:03:02  ANR0538I A resource waiter has been aborted.

05-03-2007 14:03:02  ANR4513E A database lock conflict was
encountered in  
 processing sequential volume history
information.
05-03-2007 14:03:02  ANRD icvolhst.c(4060): ThreadId<37> Lock
Conflict 
 encountered in updating volume history
list.(SESSION: 1, 
 PROCESS: 204)

05-03-2007 14:03:03  ANRD ThreadId<37> issued message  from:

 (SESSION: 1, PROCESS: 204)

05-03-2007 14:03:03  ANR4510E Server could not write sequential
volume history 
 information to volhist.out.

L2 support confirmed the timing issue and kindly asked me to restart TSM
server without volhist option so I could finsh my job.
... answers like that is why I like to spend $$$ on support...


//Henrik
(I might still not know what I am talking about..) ;)



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Cowen
Sent: den 20 mars 2007 21:49
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error writing volume history file

Some time ago (years), that error message would appear when a deadlock
of some kind prevented the volume history table from being accessed
during the write attempt.

One GB scratch volumes?  At what rate do you create/delete these during
the night?  A high rate would increase the chance of a timing window
being "illuminated".

Just curious, why such a small volume?  Would larger volumes result in a
lower rate of creation/deletion?


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Denier
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 1:57 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error writing volume history file

We are seeing the following pair of messages occasionally:

ANRD icvolhst.c(5267): ThreadId <47> Error Writing to output File.
ANR4510E Server could not write sequential volume history information to
/var/tsm_automation/volumehistory.

Successive occurances of this pair of messages are typically a week to
two weeks apart. We have a 5.3.4.0 server running under mainframe Linux.
There is plenty of disk space available in the /var file system. The
Linux error logs do not report any I/O errors when these TSM messages
occur. The path at the end of the second message is the one specified
for the sequential volume history file in our server options file.

I have already contacted IBM, but I am not optimistic about getting a
resolution; the last e-mail I got from IBM requested 'ls' command output
needed to check the possibility of root not having write access to the
volume history file.
Has anyone else seen this and found a way to stop it?


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Richard Cowen]

Some time ago (years), that error message would appear when a deadlock
of some kind prevented the volume history table from being accessed
during the write attempt.

One GB scratch volumes?  At what rate do you create/delete these during
the night?  A high rate would increase the chance of a timing window
being "illuminated".

Just curious, why such a small volume?  Would larger volumes result in a
lower rate of creation/deletion?


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Denier
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 1:57 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error writing volume history file

We are seeing the following pair of messages occasionally:

ANRD icvolhst.c(5267): ThreadId <47> Error Writing to output File.
ANR4510E Server could not write sequential volume history information to
/var/tsm_automation/volumehistory.

Successive occurances of this pair of messages are typically a week to
two weeks apart. We have a 5.3.4.0 server running under mainframe Linux.
There is plenty of disk space available in the /var file system. The
Linux error logs do not report any I/O errors when these TSM messages
occur. The path at the end of the second message is the one specified
for the sequential volume history file in our server options file.

I have already contacted IBM, but I am not optimistic about getting a
resolution; the last e-mail I got from IBM requested 'ls' command output
needed to check the possibility of root not having write access to the
volume history file.
Has anyone else seen this and found a way to stop it?

Re: Error writing volume history file

[John Monahan]

You could also try more extensive testing using the "backup volhist"
command on your own instead of waiting every one-two weeks for it to fail.


__

John Monahan
Consultant
Logicalis
5500 Wayzata Blvd Suite 315
Golden Valley, MN 55416
Office: 763-417-0552 x109
Cell: 952-221-6938
Fax:  763-417-0554
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.us.logicalis.com




Thomas Denier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
03/20/2007 03:26 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Error writing volume history file






-Bill Kelly wrote: -

>Is it not possible that the /var filesystem *sometimes* has too
>little space available? After all, didn't you say that this only
>fails roughly every one to two weeks? Perhaps the failures coincide
>with some other activity (possibly unrelated to TSM) that
>temporarily eats up most/all of the available space in /var?
>Dumps?  Logs?  Something else?

That scenario is essentially impossible to disprove conclusively,
but it doesn't look very promising as an explanation. The Linux
system is dedicated to running the TSM server and some monitoring
and automation functions for the server. We have been able to
check the free space in /var within an hour of most of the
occurances of the write failure. Dumps or log files that filled
up /var would probably have still been around when we checked
free space. There are no cron jobs that clean up files in /var,
and all the people who could have removed such files know I
aminvestigating
the write failures.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Thomas Denier]

-Tom Kauffman wrote: -

>What filesystem type? (reiser, ext3, etc.) Could you be running out
>of inodes at times?

It is an ext3 file system. We are using about 20,000 out of 300,960
inodes. I can't think of anything running on the system that would
create several hundred thousand files in /var and then remove thefiles.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Thomas Denier]

-Bill Kelly wrote: -

>Is it not possible that the /var filesystem *sometimes* has too
>little space available? After all, didn't you say that this only
>fails roughly every one to two weeks? Perhaps the failures coincide
>with some other activity (possibly unrelated to TSM) that
>temporarily eats up most/all of the available space in /var?
>Dumps?  Logs?  Something else?

That scenario is essentially impossible to disprove conclusively,
but it doesn't look very promising as an explanation. The Linux
system is dedicated to running the TSM server and some monitoring
and automation functions for the server. We have been able to
check the free space in /var within an hour of most of the
occurances of the write failure. Dumps or log files that filled
up /var would probably have still been around when we checked
free space. There are no cron jobs that clean up files in /var,
and all the people who could have removed such files know I aminvestigating
the write failures.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Kauffman, Tom]

What filesystem type? (reiser, ext3, etc.) Could you be running out of
inodes at times?

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Denier
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 1:57 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Error writing volume history file

We are seeing the following pair of messages occasionally:

ANRD icvolhst.c(5267): ThreadId <47> Error Writing to output File.
ANR4510E Server could not write sequential volume history information
to /var/tsm_automation/volumehistory.

Successive occurances of this pair of messages are typically a week
to two weeks apart. We have a 5.3.4.0 server running under mainframe
Linux. There is plenty of disk space available in the /var file
system. The Linux error logs do not report any I/O errors when these
TSM messages occur. The path at the end of the second message is the
one specified for the sequential volume history file in our server
options file.

I have already contacted IBM, but I am not optimistic about getting
a resolution; the last e-mail I got from IBM requested 'ls' command
output needed to check the possibility of root not having write
access to the volume history file.
Has anyone else seen this and found a way to stop it?
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and any attachments are for the 
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in 
reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please 
notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message 
and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive  
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Thomas Denier]

-Richard Sims wrote: -

>One possible, but less likely cause could be a volume history set of
>such size that it exceeds the "filesize" Unix Resource Limit under
>which the TSM server was started: if yours is a large set, try
>pruning and see if the problem goes away.  Another possible cause is
>the TSM server running out of file descriptors as it attempts to
>open that external file: if low, boost that number for server
>start.

The volume history file is around one megabyte. We create and fill
one gigabyte scratch volumes in file device classes every night.

I su'ed to root and executed a ulimit command. The limit for open
files is 1024. The only ulimit command in the /etc/init.d/dsmserv
script pertains to core file size, so the TSM server is presumably
using the 1024 file limit. We have 5 pairs of mirrored recovery
log volumes, 26 unmirrored database volumes, a maxsess option
value of 120, and 9 tape drives. I have not been able to think
of any plausible scenario that leads to crowding the open file
limit. If we were hitting the open file limit I would expect to
see write failures for a variety of files, not just the volume
history file.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Richard Sims]

On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Thomas Denier wrote:


We are seeing the following pair of messages occasionally:

ANRD icvolhst.c(5267): ThreadId <47> Error Writing to output File.
ANR4510E Server could not write sequential volume history information
to /var/tsm_automation/volumehistory.


Hi, Thomas -

Yet another exasperating instance of lazy programming, failing to at
least report the errno which the process thread encountered.  Would
the Development managers who may be following ADSM-L drive home to
the developers that fully useful error messages be emitted when there
is a problem?  The lack of information is wasting the time of
customers and, in this case, product support personnel.

One possible, but less likely cause could be a volume history set of
such size that it exceeds the "filesize" Unix Resource Limit under
which the TSM server was started: if yours is a large set, try
pruning and see if the problem goes away.  Another possible cause is
the TSM server running out of file descriptors as it attempts to open
that external file: if low, boost that number for server start.

   Richard Sims

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Bill Kelly]

Is it not possible that the /var filesystem *sometimes* has too little
space available?  After all, didn't you say that this only fails roughly
every one to two weeks?  Perhaps the failures coincide with some other
activity (possibly unrelated to TSM) that temporarily eats up most/all
of the available space in /var?  Dumps?  Logs?  Something else?

-Bill

Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917

>>> Thomas Denier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/20/2007 1:43
PM >>>
-Mark Stapleton wrote: -

>Does the directory exist?

Yes.

>Is there room in the /var filesystem?

The file system has about 240 megabytes of free space. Our volume
history file is a little under one megabyte.

>Does the service running dsmserv have sufficient privilege to write
>to the directory?

The server code runs as root, which can write to any file in any
directory, regardless of ownership and permission bits. The server
usually can write to the file. We update the volume history file
many times every day, and the errors occur once every week or two
on average.

>It's going to be one of those three things.
No, its not.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Thomas Denier]

-Mark Stapleton wrote: -

>Does the directory exist?

Yes.

>Is there room in the /var filesystem?

The file system has about 240 megabytes of free space. Our volume
history file is a little under one megabyte.

>Does the service running dsmserv have sufficient privilege to write
>to the directory?

The server code runs as root, which can write to any file in any
directory, regardless of ownership and permission bits. The server
usually can write to the file. We update the volume history file
many times every day, and the errors occur once every week or two
on average.

>It's going to be one of those three things.
No, its not.

Re: Error writing volume history file

[Mark Stapleton]

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Thomas Denier
We are seeing the following pair of messages occasionally:

ANRD icvolhst.c(5267): ThreadId <47> Error Writing to output File.
ANR4510E Server could not write sequential volume history information
to /var/tsm_automation/volumehistory.

 
Does the directory exist?
Is there room in the /var filesystem?
Does the service running dsmserv have sufficient privilege to write to the 
directory?
 
It's going to be one of those three things.
 
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior consultant

Re: Error restoring SQL database

[Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM]

Hi Andy!
No, the log isn't showing more detail.
Together with support, I have identified the tapes on which the backup
resides. I'm currently running an audit on these tapes. Let's wait for
the results...
Thanks for now!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: dinsdag 13 februari 2007 14:21
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error restoring SQL database

If you haven't already looked up the message, you should do so, as it
does provide a little more information.

Are you sure that the ANR0548W message is the *only* related message to
this condition? When searching the actlog, don't do any filtering,
except for the timeframe (I'd start with a timeframe from when the
client operation started through when it ended).

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew
Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageMan
ager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/13/2007
04:09:59 AM:

> Hi *SM-ers!
> Our SQL guys are trying to restore a SQL database. They receive the 
> following error:
>
> ANS1314E File data currently unavailable on server
>
> In the TSM activity log I see the following message:
>
> ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 2337961 for node 
> KL1007W9-SQL (TDP MSSQL Win32) processing file space 
> KL1007W9\data\0001
> 2 for file \Zeus\ full stored as Backup - error detected.
>
> Error detected. Right... How do I find what kind of error?
> Thank you very much for your reply!!!
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
>
> **
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly

> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
> delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its

> subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the 
> incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any 
> attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> **


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), 
its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or 
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286 
**

Re: Error restoring SQL database

[Leigh Reed]

Eric,

It's possible that the primary sequential tape volume that the data
resides on has a problem. Are you able to see which volume the restore
requires and check the status of the volume. It could be unavailable or
destroyed or you may need to perform an audit on it.

If you don't know what tape it is asking for, the following select
command will list the all tape volumes that have data on for that node.
You may have to check the status of them all.

 select distinct(volume_name) from volumeusage where
node_name='' and stgpool_name='y'

Also, you may need to check that your library is online and that you
have sufficient mount points for the restore.

If you do find that the primary volume has an issue, you may have to
recall a copy pool volume.

Leigh

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: 13 February 2007 11:10
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error restoring SQL database
Importance: High

Hi *SM-ers!
Our SQL guys are trying to restore a SQL database. They receive the
following error:

ANS1314E File data currently unavailable on server

In the TSM activity log I see the following message:

ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 2337961 for node
KL1007W9-SQL (TDP MSSQL Win32) processing file space KL1007W9\data\0001
2 for file \Zeus\ full stored as Backup - error detected.

Error detected. Right... How do I find what kind of error?
Thank you very much for your reply!!!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If
you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail
or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any
other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly
prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by
error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete
this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its
subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect
or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
number 33014286
**

Re: Error restoring SQL database

[Andrew Raibeck]

If you haven't already looked up the message, you should do so, as it does
provide a little more information.

Are you sure that the ANR0548W message is the *only* related message to
this condition? When searching the actlog, don't do any filtering, except
for the timeframe (I'd start with a timeframe from when the client
operation started through when it ended).

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/13/2007
04:09:59 AM:

> Hi *SM-ers!
> Our SQL guys are trying to restore a SQL database. They receive the
> following error:
>
> ANS1314E File data currently unavailable on server
>
> In the TSM activity log I see the following message:
>
> ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 2337961 for node
> KL1007W9-SQL (TDP MSSQL Win32) processing file space KL1007W9\data\0001
> 2 for file \Zeus\ full stored as Backup - error detected.
>
> Error detected. Right... How do I find what kind of error?
> Thank you very much for your reply!!!
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
>
> **
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
> only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of
> the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
> distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
> attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
> received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart
> Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall
> not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this
> e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
> registered number 33014286
> **

Re: Error during WMI backup

[Leigh Reed]

Thomas

This may help

http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21083177

Although it denotes that it should have been fixed in client 5.3.2.0.
See how you go.

Leigh

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Denier
Sent: 23 January 2007 17:06
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Error during WMI backup

One of our client backups is consistently failing with messages like
the following:

ANS1183E An unknown error occurred while processsing system object
'WMI Database':
 MS API function 'CoCreateInstance' failed with error -2147024882
 (0x8007000e)
ANS1228E Sending of object '\\jeffstat02\c$\ADSM.SYS\WMI\WMIDBFILE'
failed
ANS1487E An error occurred while backing up the WMI repository. The
database will not be backed up.

As far as I can tell, the Microsoft error code indicates insufficient
memory. The client is a Windows 2000 system using 5.3.2.0 client code.
The server uses 5.3.4.0 code under mainframe Linux.
Does anyone know how to fix this?

Re: Error on Windows 2003 Incremental on Large File

[Bos, Karel]

Hi,

Lookup "Received Win32 RC 1450" on google and it will give you a link to
a microsoft web page telling you to change some registry settings.

Regards,

Karel


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adrian Compton
Sent: maandag 16 oktober 2006 13:26
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Error on Windows 2003 Incremental on Large File

Hi

Does any one have any idea whaty could be causing this error. It is a VM
Machine on an IBM Blade Centre running Windows 2003 Server,  4GB Memory.
The file being backed up is from a HOTDB backup of an Oracle Empower
Database, so the file is not in use or anything like that.

Could it be a file size limitation or are there parameter I need to set
on the Client.

Thanks in Advance.

15-10-2006 20:25:32 ANSE ntrc.cpp(921): Received Win32 RC 1450
(0x05aa) from FileRead(): ReadFile
'\\plzndb01\g$\HOTDB\DATABASE\USERS01.DBF'. Error desription:
Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service.
15-10-2006 20:25:32 Normal File--> 7,918,845,952
\\plzndb01\g$\HotDB\database\USERS01.DBF  ** Unsuccessful **
15-10-2006 20:25:32 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session
reopen procedure.
15-10-2006 20:25:32 ANS1028S An internal program error occurred.
15-10-2006 20:25:33 Session established with server TSM-PLZ: AIX-RS/6000
15-10-2006 20:25:33   Server Version 5, Release 3, Level 0.0
15-10-2006 20:25:33   Server date/time: 15-10-2006 20:25:09  Last
access:
15-10-2006 20:00:03

Adrian Compton

ÿþDit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan 
geheime informatie bevatten enkel

bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien 
dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd,

verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan 
ons te melden en het bericht te

vernietigen.

Aangezien de integriteit van het 
bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels

verzending via internet, kan Atos 
Origin niet aansprakelijk worden 
gehouden

voor de inhoud daarvan.

Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij 
netwerk te hanteren, geven

wij geen enkele garantie dat dit 
bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden 
wij

enige aansprakelijkheid voor de 
mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in 
dit

bericht.

 

Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, 
aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten 
waaronder

Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten 
levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle

andere voorwaarden de 
Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin 
van toepassing.

Deze worden u op aanvraag direct 
kosteloos toegezonden.

 

This e-mail and the documents attached 
are confidential and intended solely

for the addressee; it may also be 
privileged. If you receive this e-mail

in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and destroy it.

As its integrity cannot be secured on 
the Internet, the Atos Origin group

liability cannot be triggered for the 
message content. Although the

sender endeavours to maintain a 
computer virus-free network, the sender

does not warrant that this transmission 
is virus-free and will not be

liable for any damages resulting from 
any virus transmitted.

 

On all offers and agreements under 
which Atos Origin supplies goods and/or

services of whatever nature, the Terms 
of Delivery from Atos Origin

exclusively apply. 

The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly 
submitted to you on your 

Re: Error on Windows 2003 Incremental on Large File

[Richard Sims]

On Oct 16, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Adrian Compton wrote:


'\\plzndb01\g$\HOTDB\DATABASE\USERS01.DBF'. Error desription:
Insufficient
system resources exist to complete the requested service.


Search on that message text at the TSM Support Page for known issues.

   Richard Sims

Re: Error reading label

[Bos, Karel]

Hi,

Are these scratch tapes new tapes? Did you used the "label libv" command
on the checkin?
TSM puts unlabeled tapes on the private list unless you configure your
library to autolabel new tapes.

Regards,

Karel

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Mochnaczewski
Sent: vrijdag 28 juli 2006 16:21
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Error reading label

Hi Everybody,

We recently had a new rack addition installed in our 3494 library this
Sunday. Since that was done, we have been getting about 75 scratch tapes
since Monday being changed from scratch to a private state because of
errors reading the label. I've checked about 30 of these tapes and they
look fine. Has anyone run into this problem ? Could it be an alignment
issue with the gripper ?

Rich

Dit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan geheime informatie bevatten enkel
bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd,
verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan ons te melden en het bericht te
vernietigen.
Aangezien de integriteit van het bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels
verzending via internet, kan Atos Origin niet aansprakelijk worden gehouden
voor de inhoud daarvan.
Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij netwerk te hanteren, geven
wij geen enkele garantie dat dit bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden wij
enige aansprakelijkheid voor de mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in dit
bericht.
 
Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten waaronder
Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle
andere voorwaarden de Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin van toepassing.
Deze worden u op aanvraag direct kosteloos toegezonden.
 
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely
for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail
in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group
liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the
sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender
does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be
liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.
 
On all offers and agreements under which Atos Origin supplies goods and/or
services of whatever nature, the Terms of Delivery from Atos Origin
exclusively apply. 
The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly submitted to you on your request.

Re: Error reading label

[Richard Sims]

On Jul 28, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Richard Mochnaczewski wrote:


Hi Everybody,

We recently had a new rack addition installed in our 3494 library
this Sunday. Since that was done, we have been getting about 75
scratch tapes since Monday being changed from scratch to a private
state because of errors reading the label. I've checked about 30 of
these tapes and they look fine. Has anyone run into this problem ?
Could it be an alignment issue with the gripper ?

Rich


Richard -

I presume that this was a frame install, and is a barcode reading
issue rather than success in picking, mounting, but media label
reading issue.  Barcode reading issues can result from failing to do
a full Teach on the frame so that the accessor understands
positioning therein, or (unlikely) a cell matrix has shifted since
the install.  The CE can inspect the 3494 logs to see what the issue is.

I would verify conditions by first going to the 3494 LCD panel and
checking that tapes known to be in that area are properly cataloged
as such in the LM database.  (Look for any anomalies in what it
shows, relative to other tapes in other frames.)  If the accessor
will enter the new frame area, incite an attempt to mount a tape
while you watch, and see if the laser scans the barcode region
properly, compared with scanning barcodes in the more visible frame
1, for example.

   Another Richard

Re: Error restoring db2 tablespace

[Allen S. Rout]

>> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 06:27:36 -0700, Mario Behring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:


> I am getting the following error when trying to restore a particular 
> tablespace using the "point in time recovery" using the command line:

> db2 => RESTORE db TJ tablespace ( TS4K_ADM_01 ) use tsm taken at 
> 20060724024813
> SQL2542N No match for a database image file was found based on the source
> database alias "TJ" and timestamp "20060724024813" provided.


> I've tried many different timestamps with the same result, even the
>  ones that show a  successful backup.

Something that is important in DB2 land;  make sure that the
environment under which the instance was started is the same as the
environment from which you're running dsmadutl, if you want your
results to make sense.

If you are running dsmadutl as a different user, or with a different
node configuration, the various views can be very different.Root
can see all the different files.


One of the easiest ways to mess this up is to try to restore a db from
inst_a into inst_b; even if you move the TSM config correctly, then
the files themselves are still owned by user inst_a, and TSM won't
show them to you on a dsmadutl query or give them to you on a restore.


- Allen S. Rout

Re: Error with autoloader 360716x

[Richard Sims]

Given that this is a weekend, you may not quickly hear from another
customer who has one of these mini SCSI libraries.

You may have a drive fault. Refer to your manual, and perform a Power
On Self Test, observing the amber panel light per instructions in the
manual. You can also check some status from the lib's Web interface.

Beyond that, you can check your Windows Event Log for any problem
indications, and perform tests using a Windows tape utility, to see
if you can, for example, read from a tape. As always with a SCSI
library, make sure your cables are tightly connected and your SCSI
terminator is in place. If the cable connectors were recently
disconnected, there may be the possibility of a bent pin.

Richard Sims

On Apr 14, 2006, at 10:22 PM, nghiatd wrote:


Hi all,

My TSM server includes :
- TSM 5.2 on Win2K
- Autoloader 360716x

I have a problem with tape autoloader. I can check hardware Tape
Drive Read/Write successfully, but I can move data on tape to hard
disk and vice versa. The autoloader only load the tape to drive,
but no read or write on tape. When I implement "audit libr" or
"checkin libv" command, the autoloader also load tape into drive
but no verify tape,

Do anyone have the problem ?

Thanks in advance,

Nghiatd

Re: Error

[Bos, Karel]

Are you trying to back-up a file share? Did you delete and re-install
the ITSM service on this client? Maybe the network account which was
used to backup this share isn't configured on the ITSM service anymore?

Regards,

Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bob Martoncik
Sent: woensdag 29 maart 2006 18:00
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error

Can you initiate a backup connection from the client?

Bob Martoncik
Lucas County Information Services
419-213-4633

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/29/2006 10:49 AM >>>
 Anyone know what this error means?
Upgraded to client 5.3.0.8 on windows 2000 and it's failed ever since.

03/26/2006 08:31:17 GetFileShareInfo(): connectRegistry() for machine
wincs-0159-cl1 failed, rc=5. File share information cannot be obtained.
Error is ignored.

Dit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan geheime informatie bevatten enkel
bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd,
verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan ons te melden en het bericht te
vernietigen.
Aangezien de integriteit van het bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels
verzending via internet, kan Atos Origin niet aansprakelijk worden gehouden
voor de inhoud daarvan.
Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij netwerk te hanteren, geven
wij geen enkele garantie dat dit bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden wij
enige aansprakelijkheid voor de mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in dit
bericht.
 
Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten waaronder
Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle
andere voorwaarden de Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin van toepassing.
Deze worden u op aanvraag direct kosteloos toegezonden.
 
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely
for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail
in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group
liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the
sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender
does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be
liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.
 
On all offers and agreements under which Atos Origin supplies goods and/or
services of whatever nature, the Terms of Delivery from Atos Origin
exclusively apply. 
The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly submitted to you on your request.

Re: Error

[Richard Sims]

Further, what did you upgrade from, and what account is attempting
the backup (given that the RC 5 is an Access issue, which speaks to
privilege levels)?

Richard Sims

On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Bob Martoncik wrote:


Can you initiate a backup connection from the client?

Bob Martoncik
Lucas County Information Services
419-213-4633


[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/29/2006 10:49 AM >>>

 Anyone know what this error means?
Upgraded to client 5.3.0.8 on windows 2000 and it's failed ever since.

03/26/2006 08:31:17 GetFileShareInfo(): connectRegistry() for machine
wincs-0159-cl1 failed, rc=5. File share information cannot be
obtained.
Error is ignored.

Re: Error

[Bob Martoncik]

Can you initiate a backup connection from the client?

Bob Martoncik
Lucas County Information Services
419-213-4633

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/29/2006 10:49 AM >>>
 Anyone know what this error means?
Upgraded to client 5.3.0.8 on windows 2000 and it's failed ever since.

03/26/2006 08:31:17 GetFileShareInfo(): connectRegistry() for machine
wincs-0159-cl1 failed, rc=5. File share information cannot be
obtained.
Error is ignored.

Re: error

[Aaron Becar]

Check your SELinux, and IPtable settings.  That is a problem we ran
into.  Can you ping or telnet?  Good luck!

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/12/2006 7:31:39 AM >>>
Is this client running on same box of TSM server? If yes send your
dsm.opt file and check if you enable shared memory on dsmserv.opt
(server options file).

On 1/12/06, Koti reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # ./dsmc
> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
> Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 2,
Level
> 0.0
> (c) Copyright by IBM Corporation and other(s) 1990, 2003. All Rights
> Reserved.
>
> Node Name: SHUBAM82
> ANS1473E Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure for Shared
Memory
>
>
> How to rectify above error pl help
>


--
Helder Garcia

Re: error

[Helder Garcia]

Is this client running on same box of TSM server? If yes send your
dsm.opt file and check if you enable shared memory on dsmserv.opt
(server options file).

On 1/12/06, Koti reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # ./dsmc
> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
> Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface - Version 5, Release 2, Level
> 0.0
> (c) Copyright by IBM Corporation and other(s) 1990, 2003. All Rights
> Reserved.
>
> Node Name: SHUBAM82
> ANS1473E Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure for Shared Memory
>
>
> How to rectify above error pl help
>


--
Helder Garcia

Re: Error log...

[Richard Sims]

On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Jack Coats wrote:


01/06/06   08:27:42 Error -50 sending ht request

01/06/06   08:27:42 Error writing to http socket.


Jack - This was explored a few weeks ago; involves JRE level.

See those messages in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
where I captured the essence of the issue.

Richard Sims

Re: error

[Vats.Ashok]

Lately we get a lot of the following errors, it is not node specific . I have 
no idea what to do 

Appreciate any help ?

ANR2579E Schedule WIN_DISK_DAILY in domain WIN_DISK_DOMAIN
  for node FW256 failed (return code 12). (SESSION: 47469)

Thanks,
Ashok
   

Re: Error message

[Prather, Wanda]

Assuming you are doing this with a MOVE DATA, I'd call support.
Those errors are nasty and indicate that TSM for some reason, can't read
the aggregate you are moving FROM.


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Luc Beaudoin
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 11:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Error message


I'm in the transfert of my IBM 3583 to my new IBM 3584 and I have some
error messages while I'm moving data from one library to the other

ANR1330E and ANR1331E

any ideas ???

Thanks

Luc Beaudoin
Network Administrator / Storage
Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D.
Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254

Re: Error accessing 7212 tape library within TSM

[James Choate]

Lsdev -Cc tape shows defined.

I will press on with the hardware side.

Thanks for your help.

 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stapleton, Mark
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 3:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error accessing 7212 tape library within TSM

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Choate
>I have a small TSM server using a 7212-312 vxa tape library.  The 
>library has one tape drive and 10 slots.  I am currently getting the 
>following errors trying to communicate with the tape library and can 
>not for the life of me figure out the problem.  I currently have a PMR 
>open with hardware support, and a PRM with TSM.  Hardware is saying 
>it's a TSM problem, TSM support is saying it's a hardware problem.  I 
>haven't been able to do backups for a week.  Any guidance is 
>appreciated.
>I've opened a PMR with IBM.  The CE came out and said the hardware is 
>fine, but TSM cannot communicate with it.  TSM support says we needed 
>to upgrade to TSM 5.2.6.3.  We were at TSM 5.2.4.5.

What does

  lsdev -Cc tape

show? If the library shows defined but not available, then it's a
hardware or OS error. If it shows available, then we press on.

The TSM compatible device list
(http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBM_TSM_Suppor
ted_Devices_for_AIXHPSUNWIN.html) shows both 5.2.4.5 and 5.3.1.2 as
required TSM levels. You might want to ask Tivoli support what that is
about.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional  Tivoli Storage
Management Solutions 2005 IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE)
AIX Berbee Information Networks Office 262.521.5627

Re: Error accessing 7212 tape library within TSM

[Stapleton, Mark]

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of James Choate
>I have a small TSM server using a 7212-312 vxa tape library.  The
>library has one tape drive and 10 slots.  I am currently getting the
>following errors trying to communicate with the tape library 
>and can not
>for the life of me figure out the problem.  I currently have a PMR open
>with hardware support, and a PRM with TSM.  Hardware is saying it's a
>TSM problem, TSM support is saying it's a hardware problem.  I haven't
>been able to do backups for a week.  Any guidance is appreciated.
>I've opened a PMR with IBM.  The CE came out and said the hardware is
>fine, but TSM cannot communicate with it.  TSM support says we 
>needed to upgrade to TSM 5.2.6.3.  We were at TSM 5.2.4.5.  

What does

  lsdev -Cc tape

show? If the library shows defined but not available, then it's a
hardware or OS error. If it shows available, then we press on.

The TSM compatible device list
(http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBM_TSM_Suppor
ted_Devices_for_AIXHPSUNWIN.html) shows both 5.2.4.5 and 5.3.1.2 as
required TSM levels. You might want to ask Tivoli support what that is
about.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
 Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE) AIX
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627

Re: Error "There is insufficient recovery log space to complete the database transaction"

[Jones, Eric J]

Thanks, just making sure it's the same as adding additional space to the
log file.  Figured I would rather be safe than sorry.

Thank again,
Eric

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 10:52 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error "There is insufficient recovery log space to
complete the database transaction"

Follow the Admin Guide manual to perform an Extend Log operation, as a
command within a TSM server session, if you can get in, else as a
stand-alone operation.  You need to to through the usual formatting
procedure if the log volume is an OS file, but not if it is a raw
logical volume.

Richard Sims

On Oct 15, 2005, at 10:21 PM, Jones, Eric J wrote:

> Do I just need to allocate additional log space and stop and start TSM

> or is there additional steps?  I don't think I'm close to the max
> size, the log space was not that large when the system was setup.
>

Re: Error "There is insufficient recovery log space to complete the database transaction"

[Richard Sims]

Follow the Admin Guide manual to perform an Extend Log operation, as
a command within a TSM server session, if you can get in, else as a
stand-alone operation.  You need to to through the usual formatting
procedure if the log volume is an OS file, but not if it is a raw
logical volume.

   Richard Sims

On Oct 15, 2005, at 10:21 PM, Jones, Eric J wrote:


Do I just need to allocate additional log space and stop and start TSM
or is there additional steps?  I don't think I'm close to the max
size,
the log space was not that large when the system was setup.

Re: Error "There is insufficient recovery log space to complete the database transaction"

[Jones, Eric J]

Do I just need to allocate additional log space and stop and start TSM
or is there additional steps?  I don't think I'm close to the max size,
the log space was not that large when the system was setup.

Thanks for the help,
Eric

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fred Johanson
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 7:06 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error "There is insufficient recovery log space to
complete the database transaction"

Yes.  If you have not hit the max size for version 4, then format and
allo9cate a new chunkk of log.  If you are at the max, then it's time to
RESTORE DB from your last backup.



 Original message 
>Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:31:18 -0400
>From: "Jones, Eric J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [ADSM-L] Error "There is insufficient recovery log
space to complete the database transaction"
>To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
>Good Morning
>
>I have an old TSM server running 4.1.1 on a AIX 4.3 server.
>
>When I tried to logon this morning I'm receiving an error
>"Insufficient recovery log spaceThere is insufficient
recovery log
>space to complete the database transaction"
>
>What's the best way to recovery from this?  Is the log file
out of
>space?
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Eric Jones
Fred Johanson

Re: Error "There is insufficient recovery log space to complete the database transaction"

[Fred Johanson]

Yes.  If you have not hit the max size for version 4, then
format and allo9cate a new chunkk of log.  If you are at the
max, then it's time to RESTORE DB from your last backup.



 Original message 
>Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:31:18 -0400
>From: "Jones, Eric J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [ADSM-L] Error "There is insufficient recovery log
space to complete the database transaction"
>To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
>Good Morning
>
>I have an old TSM server running 4.1.1 on a AIX 4.3 server.
>
>When I tried to logon this morning I'm receiving an error
>"Insufficient recovery log spaceThere is insufficient
recovery log
>space to complete the database transaction"
>
>What's the best way to recovery from this?  Is the log file
out of
>space?
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Eric Jones
Fred Johanson

Re: error client archive on HP-UX

[Stapleton, Mark]

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of Mario Di Pede
>Do you see this error?:
>
>ANR0106E imarqry.c(4655): Unexpected error 2 fetching row in table
>"Archive.Objects"
>
>I' have tsm server versione 5.2.6 HP-UX
>
>When display retrieve date from client gui from client 5.2.4 
>on HP-UX I see this error

Please examine the mailing list archives at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/

This topic was talked about in the last 7 days.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
 Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE) AIX
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627