Re: Sessionsecurity challenge again
Eric, I fully agree and can appreciate the dilemma. We did some quick testing of 8.1.2 on a test server and it locked up one of our admin account when going back to 7.1.7x so we setup duplicate/test admin ids. As I mentioned, we can't even think about going forwards until we stop using the web interface for client restores of our CIFS/DFS/ISILON backups. I figure when the time comes, it is going to be a long weekend of updating/upgrading all 7-servers at the same time. In fact, I am thinking I need to enable TLS/SSL server-to-server communications first, I was pleasantly surprised (actually shocked) when I discovered that IBM released 7.1.7.400 patch less than 2-weeks ago. There must have been sufficient need/demand for the patches addressed in this release for IBM to go back and patch a version that was long since surpassed with 7.1.8 and 7.1.9 releases, unless of course there are enough folks who won't/can't move forward, like us. In fact, I am going to roll it out to our offsite replica server, which is experiencing some of the problems address in this patch. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:11 AM Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM < eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote: > Hi Zoltan, > In that case prepare yourself to be stuck on 7.1.7 forever. I have had a > meeting with some developers about the new security implementation and made > some suggestions for code changes. One of them was the ability to set an > admin to transitional permanently because they tend to move around in the > network constantly, but I noticed IBM isn't very willing to help us out > here. I'm personally at a point where I'm seriously considering looking to > other vendors for our future backup solution, even though have been a > ADSM/TSM fan since version 2.1. :-( > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Zoltan Forray > Sent: dinsdag 28 augustus 2018 17:58 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: Sessionsecurity challenge again > > I am sure glad you and others are working out the "challenges" with > sessionsecurity/TLS/SSL. We are still stuck at 7.1.7.x until we complete > get off the client web interface (deprecated with 7.1.8/8.1.2) and don't > look forward to these "challenges" once we upgrade all of our servers. > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:40 AM Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM < > eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote: > > > Hi guys! > > I'm struggling (again) with the sessionsecurity issue in our 7.1.9 > server. > > I have a client node which is in fact a node which moves around in a > > cluster. So sometime the node is on one cluster node active, the next > > time on the other one. Each time the node switches to the other > > server, the session is rejected by the TSM server: > > > > ANR0428W Session 70698 for node YS001LP9-SQL (TDP MSSQL Win64) refused > > - client is down-level with this server version. (SESSION: 70698) > > > > Once the node is updated and set to transitional it's working again, > > until it switches to the other node and there it fails with the same > > error. What is the proper way to solve this issue? > > Thanks for any help in advance! > > Kind regards, > > Eric van Loon > > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain > > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. > > If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the > > e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and > > that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly > > prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by > > error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete > this message. > > > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or > > its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete > > transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any > delay in receipt. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal > > Dutch > > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with > > registered number 33014286 > > > > > > > -- > *Zoltan Forray* > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon &g
Re: Sessionsecurity challenge again
Создай 3 пула: - дисковый для стл (на пару гигабайт) - ленточный - контейнерный И направь туда данные в соответствии с тестами. Стл можно не перенсьраивать т.е при копировании в контейнер пусть будет тем же. С уважением, Ефим > 29 авг. 2018 г., в 10:08, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM > написал(а): > > Hi Zoltan, > In that case prepare yourself to be stuck on 7.1.7 forever. I have had a > meeting with some developers about the new security implementation and made > some suggestions for code changes. One of them was the ability to set an > admin to transitional permanently because they tend to move around in the > network constantly, but I noticed IBM isn't very willing to help us out here. > I'm personally at a point where I'm seriously considering looking to other > vendors for our future backup solution, even though have been a ADSM/TSM fan > since version 2.1. :-( > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Zoltan Forray > Sent: dinsdag 28 augustus 2018 17:58 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: Sessionsecurity challenge again > > I am sure glad you and others are working out the "challenges" with > sessionsecurity/TLS/SSL. We are still stuck at 7.1.7.x until we complete get > off the client web interface (deprecated with 7.1.8/8.1.2) and don't look > forward to these "challenges" once we upgrade all of our servers. > >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:40 AM Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM < >> eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote: >> >> Hi guys! >> I'm struggling (again) with the sessionsecurity issue in our 7.1.9 server. >> I have a client node which is in fact a node which moves around in a >> cluster. So sometime the node is on one cluster node active, the next >> time on the other one. Each time the node switches to the other >> server, the session is rejected by the TSM server: >> >> ANR0428W Session 70698 for node YS001LP9-SQL (TDP MSSQL Win64) refused >> - client is down-level with this server version. (SESSION: 70698) >> >> Once the node is updated and set to transitional it's working again, >> until it switches to the other node and there it fails with the same >> error. What is the proper way to solve this issue? >> Thanks for any help in advance! >> Kind regards, >> Eric van Loon >> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering >> >> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: >> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain >> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. >> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the >> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and >> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly >> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by >> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete >> this message. >> >> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or >> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete >> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any >> delay in receipt. >> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal >> Dutch >> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with >> registered number 33014286 >> >> > > > -- > *Zoltan Forray* > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor > Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University > UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - > 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable > organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your > password, social security number or confidential personal information. For > more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/ > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential > and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the > addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may > be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to > this e-ma
Re: Sessionsecurity challenge again
Hi Zoltan, In that case prepare yourself to be stuck on 7.1.7 forever. I have had a meeting with some developers about the new security implementation and made some suggestions for code changes. One of them was the ability to set an admin to transitional permanently because they tend to move around in the network constantly, but I noticed IBM isn't very willing to help us out here. I'm personally at a point where I'm seriously considering looking to other vendors for our future backup solution, even though have been a ADSM/TSM fan since version 2.1. :-( Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: dinsdag 28 augustus 2018 17:58 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Sessionsecurity challenge again I am sure glad you and others are working out the "challenges" with sessionsecurity/TLS/SSL. We are still stuck at 7.1.7.x until we complete get off the client web interface (deprecated with 7.1.8/8.1.2) and don't look forward to these "challenges" once we upgrade all of our servers. On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:40 AM Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM < eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote: > Hi guys! > I'm struggling (again) with the sessionsecurity issue in our 7.1.9 server. > I have a client node which is in fact a node which moves around in a > cluster. So sometime the node is on one cluster node active, the next > time on the other one. Each time the node switches to the other > server, the session is rejected by the TSM server: > > ANR0428W Session 70698 for node YS001LP9-SQL (TDP MSSQL Win64) refused > - client is down-level with this server version. (SESSION: 70698) > > Once the node is updated and set to transitional it's working again, > until it switches to the other node and there it fails with the same > error. What is the proper way to solve this issue? > Thanks for any help in advance! > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. > If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the > e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and > that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly > prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by > error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this > message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or > its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete > transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay > in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal > Dutch > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with > registered number 33014286 > > -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/ For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: Sessionsecurity challenge again
I am sure glad you and others are working out the "challenges" with sessionsecurity/TLS/SSL. We are still stuck at 7.1.7.x until we complete get off the client web interface (deprecated with 7.1.8/8.1.2) and don't look forward to these "challenges" once we upgrade all of our servers. On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:40 AM Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM < eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote: > Hi guys! > I'm struggling (again) with the sessionsecurity issue in our 7.1.9 server. > I have a client node which is in fact a node which moves around in a > cluster. So sometime the node is on one cluster node active, the next time > on the other one. Each time the node switches to the other server, the > session is rejected by the TSM server: > > ANR0428W Session 70698 for node YS001LP9-SQL (TDP MSSQL Win64) refused - > client is down-level with this server version. (SESSION: 70698) > > Once the node is updated and set to transitional it's working again, until > it switches to the other node and there it fails with the same error. What > is the proper way to solve this issue? > Thanks for any help in advance! > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If > you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or > any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other > action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may > be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the > sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its > employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission > of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered > number 33014286 > > -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/
Sessionsecurity challenge again
Hi guys! I'm struggling (again) with the sessionsecurity issue in our 7.1.9 server. I have a client node which is in fact a node which moves around in a cluster. So sometime the node is on one cluster node active, the next time on the other one. Each time the node switches to the other server, the session is rejected by the TSM server: ANR0428W Session 70698 for node YS001LP9-SQL (TDP MSSQL Win64) refused - client is down-level with this server version. (SESSION: 70698) Once the node is updated and set to transitional it's working again, until it switches to the other node and there it fails with the same error. What is the proper way to solve this issue? Thanks for any help in advance! Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
