Patches required for TSM 5.5 on Solaris 9
Hi all I know I asked this question before but I still have not found a clear answer. Is there a list of the required OS patches to run TSM 5.5 on Solaris 9? I have found all the other information I need, but not that bit. Regards Farren Minns This email (and any attachment) is confidential, may be legally privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient please do not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error please tell us by reply and delete all copies on your system. Although this email has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check as the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug or virus infection. Please note that email traffic data may be monitored and that emails may be viewed for security reasons. John Wiley Sons Limited is a private limited company registered in England with registered number 641132. Registered office address: The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ.
Re: Patches required for TSM 5.5 on Solaris 9
Hi I know only TSM client patch requirements: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=1019context=SSSQWCcontext=SSGSG7q1=solarisuid=swg21318605loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en Usually during server installation process you will see required patches. Efim 2009/6/5 Minns, Farren - Chichester fmi...@wiley.com Hi all I know I asked this question before but I still have not found a clear answer. Is there a list of the required OS patches to run TSM 5.5 on Solaris 9? I have found all the other information I need, but not that bit. Regards Farren Minns This email (and any attachment) is confidential, may be legally privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient please do not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error please tell us by reply and delete all copies on your system. Although this email has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check as the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug or virus infection. Please note that email traffic data may be monitored and that emails may be viewed for security reasons. John Wiley Sons Limited is a private limited company registered in England with registered number 641132. Registered office address: The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ. -- Efim
Bad connection client Solaris 9 and 10
Hi guys, Recently, I started getting these errors in the dsmerror.log: 04/16/07 18:37:13 sessInit: Transitioning: sInit state === sTRANSERR state 04/16/07 18:37:21 sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received. 04/16/07 18:37:21 sessRecvVerb(): length=4845, verb=41,magic=44 04/16/07 18:37:21 sessInit: Starting communications initialization 04/16/07 18:37:21 sessInit: Transitioning: sInit state === sTRANSERR state 04/16/07 18:37:42 sessInit: Starting communications initialization 04/16/07 18:37:42 sessInit: Transitioning: sInit state === sTRANSERR state 04/16/07 18:37:44 sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received. 04/16/07 18:37:44 sessRecvVerb(): length=, verb=00,magic=02 04/16/07 18:37:44 sessInit: Starting communications initialization 04/16/07 18:37:44 sessInit: Transitioning: sInit state === sTRANSERR state 04/16/07 18:37:52 sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received. 04/16/07 18:37:52 sessRecvVerb(): length=0300, verb=00,magic=0b 04/16/07 18:37:52 sessInit: Starting communications initialization 04/16/07 18:37:52 sessInit: Transitioning: sInit state === sTRANSERR state 04/16/07 18:38:01 sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received. 04/16/07 18:38:01 sessRecvVerb(): length=00c8, verb=00,magic=00 04/16/07 18:38:01 sessInit: Starting communications initialization 04/16/07 18:38:01 sessInit: Transitioning: sInit state === sTRANSERR state 04/16/07 18:38:13 sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received. 04/17/07 07:58:16 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'RESP_PPRD01DB' failed. Return code = 12. 04/17/07 07:58:21 ANS2050E TSM needs to prompt for the password but cannot prompt because the process is running in the background. 04/17/07 07:58:21 ANS2050E TSM needs to prompt for the password but cannot prompt because the process is running in the background. 04/17/07 07:58:21 ANS1029E Communication with the TSM server is lost. I have AIX tsm server 5.2.0.0 My clients are tsm ba client 5.3.0.0 on AIX, Linux but this errors occur only in Solaris 9 and mostly solaris 10 I reset the password in the server and prompted in the client and it works for a few days. After all, it comes back again with the errors in the communications. Any idea? Best regards Ing. Guillermo Palos Luna Administrador de Servidores y Estrategia de Respaldos. Dirección de Operaciones y Estrategia Tecnológica Vicerrectoría de Tecnologías de Información (VITI) Tecnológico de Monterrey Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 427 Sur esq. av. Luis Elizondo, Edificio Pabellón Tec. Local 12 y 13, Planta Baja CP 64840 Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, México Tel: +52 (81) 83581400 ext. 2936 y 2937. Fax: +52 (81) 81582287 http://www.itesm.mx/ http://www.itesm.mx/ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/\/ El contenido de este mensaje de datos no se considera oferta, propuesta o acuerdo, sino hasta que sea confirmado en documento por escrito que contenga la firma autógrafa del apoderado legal del ITESM. El contenido de este mensaje de datos es confidencial y se entiende dirigido y para uso exclusivo del destinatario, por lo que no podrá distribuirse y/o difundirse por ningún medio sin la previa autorización del emisor original. Si usted no es el destinatario, se le prohíbe su utilización total o parcial para cualquier fin. The content of this data transmission is not considered as an offer, proposal, understanding, or agreement unless it is confirmed in a document signed by a legal representative of ITESM. The content of this data transmission is confidential and it is intended to be delivered only to the addresses, therefore, it shall not be distributed and/or disclosed through any mean without the original sender's previous authorization. If you are not the addressee you are forbidden to use it, either totally or partially, for any purpose.
Install TSM 5.2 on solaris 9
I need to install TSM 5.2 server/client on Sun Fire 240 running solaris 9 but I don't have any installation document. Can someone point me to a website that I can get TSM document for installation? Thanks, David
Re: Install TSM 5.2 on solaris 9
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:45:41PM -0500, David Nguyen wrote: I need to install TSM 5.2 server/client on Sun Fire 240 running solaris 9 but I don't have any installation document. Can someone point me to a website that I can get TSM document for installation? http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/IBMStorageManagerforSunSolaris5.2.html
Re: Install TSM 5.2 on solaris 9
That's great. Thanks a lot. David [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/05/05 2:22 PM On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:45:41PM -0500, David Nguyen wrote: I need to install TSM 5.2 server/client on Sun Fire 240 running solaris 9 but I don't have any installation document. Can someone point me to a website that I can get TSM document for installation? http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/IBMStorageManagerforSunSolaris5.2.html
Re: Install TSM 5.2 on solaris 9
The Tivoli main site is a good jumping-off point: http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html Then you can click on Product Documentation. From there, narrowing down the search to include Solaris, I got to: http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663context=SSGSG7dc=DA420dc=DA410dc=DA440dc=DA430q1=solarisuid=pub1gc32160100loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en David Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 10/05/2005 02:45 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] Install TSM 5.2 on solaris 9 I need to install TSM 5.2 server/client on Sun Fire 240 running solaris 9 but I don't have any installation document. Can someone point me to a website that I can get TSM document for installation? Thanks, David
Re TSM 5.1 - 5.2 and Solaris 9
Hi all TSMers I am hoping to be getting a new Sun Fire V240 to replace our current E250 TSM backup server. At present our E250 still have Solaris 2.7 as the OS and I need to move top at least 2.8 in order to upgrade to TSM 5.2. What I am hoping to do providing the new server is fourth coming (and that is not yet guaranteed), is install Solaris 2.9 and then recreate the same TSM environment as on the existing E250 ( so initially running TSM 5.1.6.2 under Solaris 2.9). I will then proceed with the upgrade of TSM 5.1 to 5.2. So my question is this. Does anyone have any experience on running TSM 5.1 on Solaris 2.9 and is it a supported mix? Many thanks in advance Farren Minns Solaris System Admin / Oracle DBA IT - Hosting Services ## The information contained in this e-mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and confidential and intended solely for the named recipient(s). If you are not a named recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or disseminate the information, open any attachment, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received the e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the e-mail. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual sender, unless otherwise stated. Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check, as the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug or virus infection. ##
Re: Re TSM 5.1 - 5.2 and Solaris 9
Read the README docs that accompany the installation code for 5.1. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005 IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE) AIX Office 262.521.5627 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farren Minns Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 10:23 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re TSM 5.1 - 5.2 and Solaris 9 Hi all TSMers I am hoping to be getting a new Sun Fire V240 to replace our current E250 TSM backup server. At present our E250 still have Solaris 2.7 as the OS and I need to move top at least 2.8 in order to upgrade to TSM 5.2. What I am hoping to do providing the new server is fourth coming (and that is not yet guaranteed), is install Solaris 2.9 and then recreate the same TSM environment as on the existing E250 ( so initially running TSM 5.1.6.2 under Solaris 2.9). I will then proceed with the upgrade of TSM 5.1 to 5.2. So my question is this. Does anyone have any experience on running TSM 5.1 on Solaris 2.9 and is it a supported mix? Many thanks in advance Farren Minns Solaris System Admin / Oracle DBA IT - Hosting Services ## The information contained in this e-mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and confidential and intended solely for the named recipient(s). If you are not a named recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or disseminate the information, open any attachment, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received the e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the e-mail. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual sender, unless otherwise stated. Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check, as the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug or virus infection. ##
Re: Strange behaviour solaris 9 with domain option
Hi Samiran That's exactly what I did to overcome the problem, however I am still curious as to why the behavior is different than on other platforms. Thanks for you response. Regards Steve Hartland Lechabile Storage Solutions 0824645461 -Original Message- From: Das, Samiran (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 6:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Strange behaviour solaris 9 with domain option Steve, Use the following statement instead of what you are using. Domain all-local -/oradata1 -/oradata2 Regards, Samiran Das -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Hartland Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Strange behaviour solaris 9 with domain option Hi Fellow TSM'ers Problem as follows: Server 5.2.2.0 Client 5.2.0.0 also tested 5.2.2.0 Solaris 5.9 If I use the domain statement in the dsm.sys file to exclude any one of the file systems, it excludes all the file systems for example. I have the following FS's on the client server / /var /oradata1 /oradata2 /backup1 /backup2 /app I want to exclude /oradata 1 2 from being backed up, so I put this in the dsm.sys file: Domain -/oradata1 -/oradata2 I then run an incremental from the command line or a schedule and nothing is backed up. I have tested this scenario on a Solaris 5.8 and an AIX 5.1 machine and it works as expected. I.e. all FS's are backed up except the ones excluded by the domain statement. Has anyone else experienced this type of thing. Regards Steve Hartland Lechabile Storage Solutions 0824645461 If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
Strange behaviour solaris 9 with domain option
Hi Fellow TSM'ers Problem as follows: Server 5.2.2.0 Client 5.2.0.0 also tested 5.2.2.0 Solaris 5.9 If I use the domain statement in the dsm.sys file to exclude any one of the file systems, it excludes all the file systems for example. I have the following FS's on the client server / /var /oradata1 /oradata2 /backup1 /backup2 /app I want to exclude /oradata 1 2 from being backed up, so I put this in the dsm.sys file: Domain -/oradata1 -/oradata2 I then run an incremental from the command line or a schedule and nothing is backed up. I have tested this scenario on a Solaris 5.8 and an AIX 5.1 machine and it works as expected. I.e. all FS's are backed up except the ones excluded by the domain statement. Has anyone else experienced this type of thing. Regards Steve Hartland Lechabile Storage Solutions 0824645461
Re: Strange behaviour solaris 9 with domain option
Steve, Use the following statement instead of what you are using. Domain all-local -/oradata1 -/oradata2 Regards, Samiran Das -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Hartland Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Strange behaviour solaris 9 with domain option Hi Fellow TSM'ers Problem as follows: Server 5.2.2.0 Client 5.2.0.0 also tested 5.2.2.0 Solaris 5.9 If I use the domain statement in the dsm.sys file to exclude any one of the file systems, it excludes all the file systems for example. I have the following FS's on the client server / /var /oradata1 /oradata2 /backup1 /backup2 /app I want to exclude /oradata 1 2 from being backed up, so I put this in the dsm.sys file: Domain -/oradata1 -/oradata2 I then run an incremental from the command line or a schedule and nothing is backed up. I have tested this scenario on a Solaris 5.8 and an AIX 5.1 machine and it works as expected. I.e. all FS's are backed up except the ones excluded by the domain statement. Has anyone else experienced this type of thing. Regards Steve Hartland Lechabile Storage Solutions 0824645461 If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
Problem with 3582 on Solaris 9
Hi all I am having a bit of an arm wrestle getting TSM to write to LTO2 drives in a 3582 library. Config as follows: TSM 5.2.2.0 (also tried 5.2.0.0) Solaris 5.9 Direct fibre attached to 2 drives. Drive firmware 38D0 (latest on web) IBMtape (latest on web dated 19 May) Problem description: When trying to label tape, library mounts tape in drive, rewinds tape, and unloads it without appearing to write to it. TSM reports I/O error with KEY, ASC and ASCQ all zero. TSM then reports that the volume has been labeled and even checks it in. q libv shows volser present as scratch. Backup attempt fails exactly the same as label libv attempt. Drive entries in output of dmesg command seem to be correct. Have tried all 8 /dev/rmt options eg. 0st,0stc, etc. All fail Have also tried with and without the TSM Device Driver. Even tried configuring drive as manual and manually load tape. Still fails. The strange thing is that write and read back using TAR command works fine on both drives. Hair being depleted. Any ideas Regards, Steve Hartland Lechabile Storage Solutions 0824645461
Re: Problem with 3582 on Solaris 9
Just ideas... If tar works and TSM doesn't, that could indicate your ELEMENT addresses are wrong. That is, TSM thinks /dev/rmtx is drive 1, so it mounts the tape in drive 1, but AIX is looking for the tape on drive 0. Do a Q DRIVE * F=D, make sure the element addresses are correct. The other thing I have seen cause weird I/O errors is the driver for the HBA. I am clueless about Solaris hardware, but I know that on Windows, the HBA drivers are separate code and are not provided with IBMTAPE. Check to make sure you have the latest level of driver for the HBA, AND that it is set up for point-to-point or switched fabric, not artitrated loop. Good luck! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Hartland Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem with 3582 on Solaris 9 Hi all I am having a bit of an arm wrestle getting TSM to write to LTO2 drives in a 3582 library. Config as follows: TSM 5.2.2.0 (also tried 5.2.0.0) Solaris 5.9 Direct fibre attached to 2 drives. Drive firmware 38D0 (latest on web) IBMtape (latest on web dated 19 May) Problem description: When trying to label tape, library mounts tape in drive, rewinds tape, and unloads it without appearing to write to it. TSM reports I/O error with KEY, ASC and ASCQ all zero. TSM then reports that the volume has been labeled and even checks it in. q libv shows volser present as scratch. Backup attempt fails exactly the same as label libv attempt. Drive entries in output of dmesg command seem to be correct. Have tried all 8 /dev/rmt options eg. 0st,0stc, etc. All fail Have also tried with and without the TSM Device Driver. Even tried configuring drive as manual and manually load tape. Still fails. The strange thing is that write and read back using TAR command works fine on both drives. Hair being depleted. Any ideas Regards, Steve Hartland Lechabile Storage Solutions 0824645461
Re: Problem with 3582 on Solaris 9
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda If tar works and TSM doesn't, that could indicate your ELEMENT addresses are wrong. Another symptom of an element mismatch is if TSM will mount a tape but be unable to use it and/or dismount it. -- Mark Stapleton
Anyone using Solaris 9 and 4.2 client?
Is this something related to Solaris 9, or does the filesystem just need a fsck? This is with a 4.2 client. 04/01/04 19:52:14 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=164 from fioGetDirEntries: /export /lost+found 04/01/04 19:52:20 ANS4023E Error processing '/export': file input/output error 04/01/04 19:52:20 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'LE' failed. Return code = 12. Dale Jolliff Data Administration Team Backup and Recovery
Re: TSM Server 4.2.2.10 from AIX 4.3 to TSM Server 5.2 on SUN Solaris 9
Okay, but Is it also necessary to install el current TSM version on Solaris 8 in order to do a server-to-server export between AIX and Solaris?. After it, have you realized a restore of database backup from server (AIX) to another server (Solaris)? Thank you. Juan R. -Mensaje original- De: Douglas Currell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Viernes, 13 de Febrero de 2004 02:34 p.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: TSM Server 4.2.2.10 from AIX 4.3 to TSM Server 5.2 on SUN Solaris 9 About a year ago I was involved in moving a 40GB TSM database from AIX 4.3 to Solaris 8. The first thing that we did was upgrade the TSM on the AIX box to the, then, current TSM version which was 5.1. A server-to-server export would have taken, quite literally, months. So the previous the database backup was restored with the dsmserv commands. I am at home and won't have all the details till I go to work on Tuesday. I can give you some good advice on this subject. Something that I certainly do remember is the necessity put database, recovery log, and stgpool volumes on raw disks. Juan Jose Reale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello I need to know how to migrate TSM Server 4.2.2.10 from AIX Operating System to TSM server 5.2 on Sun Solaris 9 Operating System. We currently have TSM Server 4.2.2.10 (32 bit) on AIX 4.3. I believe we should do the migrate from TSM server AIX to Sun Solaris first, then go from TSM Server 4.2.2.10 to TSM 5.2, but I'm not sure. Please give me some advice or best ways to do that. Any hints and tips are very welcome and appreciated. Thanks in advance. Juan R. This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-Mail and delete this e-Mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject matter of the above e-Mail, this e-Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-Mail does not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs service. - Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Canada Personals This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs service. This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-Mail and delete this e-Mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject matter of the above e-Mail, this e-Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-Mail does not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs service.
TSM Server 4.2.2.10 from AIX 4.3 to TSM Server 5.2 on SUN Solaris 9
Hello I need to know how to migrate TSM Server 4.2.2.10 from AIX Operating System to TSM server 5.2 on Sun Solaris 9 Operating System. We currently have TSM Server 4.2.2.10 (32 bit) on AIX 4.3. I believe we should do the migrate from TSM server AIX to Sun Solaris first, then go from TSM Server 4.2.2.10 to TSM 5.2, but I'm not sure. Please give me some advice or best ways to do that. Any hints and tips are very welcome and appreciated. Thanks in advance. Juan R. This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-Mail and delete this e-Mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject matter of the above e-Mail, this e-Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-Mail does not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs service.
Re: TSM Server 4.2.2.10 from AIX 4.3 to TSM Server 5.2 on SUN Solaris 9
About a year ago I was involved in moving a 40GB TSM database from AIX 4.3 to Solaris 8. The first thing that we did was upgrade the TSM on the AIX box to the, then, current TSM version which was 5.1. A server-to-server export would have taken, quite literally, months. So the previous the database backup was restored with the dsmserv commands. I am at home and won't have all the details till I go to work on Tuesday. I can give you some good advice on this subject. Something that I certainly do remember is the necessity put database, recovery log, and stgpool volumes on raw disks. Juan Jose Reale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello I need to know how to migrate TSM Server 4.2.2.10 from AIX Operating System to TSM server 5.2 on Sun Solaris 9 Operating System. We currently have TSM Server 4.2.2.10 (32 bit) on AIX 4.3. I believe we should do the migrate from TSM server AIX to Sun Solaris first, then go from TSM Server 4.2.2.10 to TSM 5.2, but I'm not sure. Please give me some advice or best ways to do that. Any hints and tips are very welcome and appreciated. Thanks in advance. Juan R. This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-Mail and delete this e-Mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject matter of the above e-Mail, this e-Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-Mail does not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs service. - Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Canada Personals
Re: Solaris 9
On 03-Sep-02 Bob Booth - UIUC wrote: I asked the same question several weeks ago. I have not yet called ITSM support on the issue, however, I was able to hack the install script and Solaris 9 seems to work with no problems (so far). I will let the list know what support tells me about client support for Solaris 9. Tivoli (Freddy Saldena) told me at the SHARE that a Solaris 9 client is released when TSM 5.1.15 is released, probably Oct. '02. I don't have a clue why it isn't released now. Cheers, Henk ten Have.
Re: Solaris 9
Actually it is 5.1.5 which is a maintenance release that can include new functionality. The projected release date is early October. Rumor October 8th, and rumor, if you enter the beta you can have 5.1.5 right now. There is a lot of stuff in 5.1.5 including automated rudimentary support for mailbox level restore using EXMERGE. So, we will see. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon Inc. 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Henk ten Have [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 6:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Solaris 9 On 03-Sep-02 Bob Booth - UIUC wrote: I asked the same question several weeks ago. I have not yet called ITSM support on the issue, however, I was able to hack the install script and Solaris 9 seems to work with no problems (so far). I will let the list know what support tells me about client support for Solaris 9. Tivoli (Freddy Saldena) told me at the SHARE that a Solaris 9 client is released when TSM 5.1.15 is released, probably Oct. '02. I don't have a clue why it isn't released now. Cheers, Henk ten Have.
Re: Solaris 9
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Bremer Some of our users are asking about a Solaris 9 TSM client? It is not yet listed at the support system page. Anyone have an idea about when support for this will be available? Any experience with the current TSM Solaris client on 9? From http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/adclsuns.htm: No currently available version of the TSM client for Solaris supports Solaris version 9. That's not to say that you couldn't get it to work, but Tivoli does not officially support it, and will tell you so when you seek help for it. You probably already know this. Why not try it yourself, and tell us all how it came out? IBM/Tivoli employees who are participants in this list will not be able to make any official announcements or pronouncements about Solaris 9, so all the responses you'll most likely get here will be about worth the electrons it took to send the message to you. Relax, and it'll be here when it's here. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Certified TSM consultant Certified AIX system engineer MCSE
Re: Solaris 9
I asked the same question several weeks ago. I have not yet called ITSM support on the issue, however, I was able to hack the install script and Solaris 9 seems to work with no problems (so far). I will let the list know what support tells me about client support for Solaris 9. Good Luck. bob On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 07:25:46AM -0600, John Bremer wrote: *SMers, Some of our users are asking about a Solaris 9 TSM client? It is not yet listed at the support system page. Anyone have an idea about when support for this will be available? Any experience with the current TSM Solaris client on 9? Thanks. John
Re: Solaris 9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On maandag, september 2, 2002, at 11:26 , Mark Stapleton wrote: IBM/Tivoli employees who are participants in this list will not be able to make any official announcements or pronouncements about Solaris 9, so all the responses you'll most likely get here will be about worth the electrons it took to send the message to you. Relax, and it'll be here when it's here. Which is a bit a problem, Solaris 9 has been publicly available for a few months now and the beta's are publicly avaialable for well over half a year now. So why is there still no support from Tivoli for the most recent release of one of the most used server platforms worldwide? This is actually a problem in our company as well, we're posponing long overdue upgrades due to lack of a TSM client. Hacking the client install script is IMHO not the way to go. Tivoli should just do a better job in providing this client - --- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 PGP keys at http://home.sara.nl/~remco/keys.asc I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin) iD8DBQE9dK5yBIoCv9yTlOwRAp5+AJwN4Cs7VMZ5p0jvkJJP3yzJXs1c0gCeOAEB c+8GoOemifqyLisJsBuOYPo= =J3MP -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: TSM and Solaris 9
Bob Booth - UIUC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone heard when an ITSM client will be available for Solaris 9? We tried to install the latest patch level, and it failed. Do you mean the install failed? The Solaris install package, as built by IBM/Tivoli, will reject a Solaris 9 system. It is possible to hack the package to allow it to install (details available on request). Or do you mean you were able to install it but it didn't work? Please provide more specifics. Steve Bacher Draper Laboratory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TSM and Solaris 9
We did not hack the install package, and the install failed. I would be happy to have the details, and I would be happier if IBM/Tivoli would provide a statement of direction for support on Solaris 9. Thanks for you assistance! Bob On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:16:19AM -0400, Stephen E. Bacher wrote: Bob Booth - UIUC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone heard when an ITSM client will be available for Solaris 9? We tried to install the latest patch level, and it failed. Do you mean the install failed? The Solaris install package, as built by IBM/Tivoli, will reject a Solaris 9 system. It is possible to hack the package to allow it to install (details available on request). Or do you mean you were able to install it but it didn't work? Please provide more specifics. Steve Bacher Draper Laboratory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TSM and Solaris 9
I would call support Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon, INC 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Bob Booth - UIUC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM and Solaris 9 Has anyone heard when an ITSM client will be available for Solaris 9? We tried to install the latest patch level, and it failed. thanks, bob
