Re: Result Code -99 - Job Failed
I recommended it because it returns three hits (instances of a single problem), such as PK64790. Richard Sims On Nov 3, 2008, at 7:13 PM, Cheung, Richard wrote: I had tried that already and found nothing -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Monday, 3 November 2008 10:40 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Result Code -99 - Job Failed I would search on Result Code -99 at the TSM Support Page, http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageMan ager.html
Re: Result Code -99 - Job Failed
I would search on Result Code -99 at the TSM Support Page, http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html On Nov 3, 2008, at 2:25 AM, Cheung, Richard wrote: Hello.. Have recently upgraded most of my nodes to v5.5.1. I am now seeing a lot of Failed - Result Code -99 in the operational reporting I receive daily. A check of the dsmerror.log shows no real major problems - cant find much on what -99 mean... anyone have any ideas?
Re: Result Code -99 - Job Failed
I had tried that already and found nothing -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Monday, 3 November 2008 10:40 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Result Code -99 - Job Failed I would search on Result Code -99 at the TSM Support Page, http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageMan ager.html On Nov 3, 2008, at 2:25 AM, Cheung, Richard wrote: Hello.. Have recently upgraded most of my nodes to v5.5.1. I am now seeing a lot of Failed - Result Code -99 in the operational reporting I receive daily. A check of the dsmerror.log shows no real major problems - cant find much on what -99 mean... anyone have any ideas? html body font face=arial color=#808080 size=-2img alt=Santos Logo src=http://www.santos.com/library/logo.gif; brSantos Ltd A.B.N. 80 007 550 923br Disclaimer: The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please immediately advise us by return email and delete the email without making a copy./font font face=arial color=#008000 size=-2Please consider the environment before printing this email/font /body /html
Re: Result Code -99 - Job Failed
What is the TSM server code level? We're running server version 5.4.2.0 on AIX. In our case I think the -99 error comes at the end of schedules, and there is a fix available. (IIRC) I plan on rolling the fix in asap, but we want to be ready to update all servers in a short timeframe. [RC] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cheung, Richard Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 11:25 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Result Code -99 - Job Failed Hello.. Have recently upgraded most of my nodes to v5.5.1. I am now seeing a lot of Failed - Result Code -99 in the operational reporting I receive daily. A check of the dsmerror.log shows no real major problems - cant find much on what -99 mean... anyone have any ideas? Richard html body font face=arial color=#808080 size=-2img alt=Santos Logo src=http://www.santos.com/library/logo.gif; brSantos Ltd A.B.N. 80 007 550 923br Disclaimer: The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please immediately advise us by return email and delete the email without making a copy./font font face=arial color=#008000 size=-2Please consider the environment before printing this email/font /body /html DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message.
Re: Result Code -99 - Job Failed
It is server v5.4.3 - seem to be only getting this from client v5.5.1 - all on windows. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark, Robert A Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2008 11:11 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Result Code -99 - Job Failed What is the TSM server code level? We're running server version 5.4.2.0 on AIX. In our case I think the -99 error comes at the end of schedules, and there is a fix available. (IIRC) I plan on rolling the fix in asap, but we want to be ready to update all servers in a short timeframe. [RC] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cheung, Richard Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 11:25 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Result Code -99 - Job Failed Hello.. Have recently upgraded most of my nodes to v5.5.1. I am now seeing a lot of Failed - Result Code -99 in the operational reporting I receive daily. A check of the dsmerror.log shows no real major problems - cant find much on what -99 mean... anyone have any ideas? Richard html body font face=arial color=#808080 size=-2img alt=Santos Logo src=http://www.santos.com/library/logo.gif; brSantos Ltd A.B.N. 80 007 550 923br Disclaimer: The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please immediately advise us by return email and delete the email without making a copy./font font face=arial color=#008000 size=-2Please consider the environment before printing this email/font /body /html DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message.
Re: Result Code -99 - Job Failed
Go to the URL in my sig and do a search on the following: -99 enter it just as I have shown it here, with the double quotes. You will see an APAR that addresses this. Best regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 11/03/2008 08:00:41 PM: [image removed] Re: Result Code -99 - Job Failed Cheung, Richard to: ADSM-L 11/03/2008 08:01 PM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager It is server v5.4.3 - seem to be only getting this from client v5.5.1 - all on windows. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark, Robert A Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2008 11:11 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Result Code -99 - Job Failed What is the TSM server code level? We're running server version 5.4.2.0 on AIX. In our case I think the -99 error comes at the end of schedules, and there is a fix available. (IIRC) I plan on rolling the fix in asap, but we want to be ready to update all servers in a short timeframe. [RC] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cheung, Richard Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 11:25 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Result Code -99 - Job Failed Hello.. Have recently upgraded most of my nodes to v5.5.1. I am now seeing a lot of Failed - Result Code -99 in the operational reporting I receive daily. A check of the dsmerror.log shows no real major problems - cant find much on what -99 mean... anyone have any ideas? Richard html body font face=arial color=#808080 size=-2img alt=Santos Logo src=http://www.santos.com/library/logo.gif; brSantos Ltd A.B.N. 80 007 550 923br Disclaimer: The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please immediately advise us by return email and delete the email without making a copy./font font face=arial color=#008000 size=-2Please consider the environment before printing this email/font /body /html DISCLAIMER: This message is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this message.
Result Code -99 - Job Failed
Hello.. Have recently upgraded most of my nodes to v5.5.1. I am now seeing a lot of Failed - Result Code -99 in the operational reporting I receive daily. A check of the dsmerror.log shows no real major problems - cant find much on what -99 mean... anyone have any ideas? Richard html body font face=arial color=#808080 size=-2img alt=Santos Logo src=http://www.santos.com/library/logo.gif; brSantos Ltd A.B.N. 80 007 550 923br Disclaimer: The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please immediately advise us by return email and delete the email without making a copy./font font face=arial color=#008000 size=-2Please consider the environment before printing this email/font /body /html
Prompted for Password every time/Scheduler exited with a result code of 12.
I had a working, clustered TDP Exchange scheduler. Due to an issue, I had to reset the password on the node. Since doing that, I have been unable to get the service to run again. The service will start briefly and then stop. The Event Log shows first a warning ID 4098 (Error initializing TSM api, unable to verify Registry Password), and ends with an error ID of 4099 (Scheduler exited with a result code of 12). I believe a symptom of the same problem is exhibited when I run the client manually. When I do this, I am prompted for the password every time. I have used the UPDATEPW command to reset the password in the registry. I have even deleted the registry key beforehand so that I can see that it is actually being created/updated (it appears to be working as expected). Doing a QUERY seems to work ok as well. I have also deleted the service and recreated it. I have been careful to make sure the nodename, clusternode, and clustername parameters are updated correctly. Am I missing something obvious here? Any assistance gratefully accepted. Thanks! ~~ Bill Mayo Network Administrator Pitt County MIS
Re: Prompted for Password every time/Scheduler exited with a result code of 12.
I am fairly confident at this point that the problem is that the password is not being properly updated in the registry, but I am at a loss as to how to correct it. The reboot did not help. I will admit to not completely understanding what registry it is trying to update. I was looking at the local registry when I mentioned observing it for changes, but I am now thinking that it is really using the cluster registry. At any rate, I have used the query command to update the password, but it just won't stick. I feel like I must be doing something wrong, but I don't know what. _ From: Mayo, Bill Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 11:12 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Prompted for Password every time/Scheduler exited with a result code of 12. I had a working, clustered TDP Exchange scheduler. Due to an issue, I had to reset the password on the node. Since doing that, I have been unable to get the service to run again. The service will start briefly and then stop. The Event Log shows first a warning ID 4098 (Error initializing TSM api, unable to verify Registry Password), and ends with an error ID of 4099 (Scheduler exited with a result code of 12). I believe a symptom of the same problem is exhibited when I run the client manually. When I do this, I am prompted for the password every time. I have used the UPDATEPW command to reset the password in the registry. I have even deleted the registry key beforehand so that I can see that it is actually being created/updated (it appears to be working as expected). Doing a QUERY seems to work ok as well. I have also deleted the service and recreated it. I have been careful to make sure the nodename, clusternode, and clustername parameters are updated correctly. Am I missing something obvious here? Any assistance gratefully accepted. Thanks! ~~ Bill Mayo Network Administrator Pitt County MIS
Server rejected session; result code: 52
Greetings All, Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? f1n15 /tsg/tsmmore dsmerror.log 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from server 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z ' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 02.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with failur es. Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+405-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us .
Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52
Have you checked if your password is still valid? If I am remembering right then 52 notes that your password has expired. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Greetings All, Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? f1n15 /tsg/tsmmore dsmerror.log 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from server 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z ' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 02.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with failur es. Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+405-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us .
Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52
h .. If I start dsmc incr session , TSM won't ask me for password ,it starts backing up . Normal File-- 1,431 /etc/vfs [Sent] Normal File-- 101 /etc/xtab [Sent] Normal File-- 1,310 /etc/xtiso.conf [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/data [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/httpdlite [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/work [Sent] Normal File--62 /etc/IMNSearch/.imnhelp [Sent] ANS1898I * Processed 1,000 files * Total number of objects inspected:1,161 Total number of objects backed up:0 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 299.09 KB Data transfer time:0.00 sec Network data transfer rate:93,701.96 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate:220.83 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:01 f1n15 /tsg/tsm Manuel Schweiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2002 10:29 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Have you checked if your password is still valid? If I am remembering right then 52 notes that your password has expired. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Greetings All, Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? f1n15 /tsg/tsmmore dsmerror.log 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from server 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z ' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 02.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with failur es. Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+405-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us .
Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52
I would look at the number of running scheduled sessions at that time. The message is pointing at a server action (server rejected session), so try the actlog. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: woensdag 20 november 2002 16:28 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 h .. If I start dsmc incr session , TSM won't ask me for password ,it starts backing up . Normal File-- 1,431 /etc/vfs [Sent] Normal File-- 101 /etc/xtab [Sent] Normal File-- 1,310 /etc/xtiso.conf [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/data [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/httpdlite [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/work [Sent] Normal File--62 /etc/IMNSearch/.imnhelp [Sent] ANS1898I * Processed 1,000 files * Total number of objects inspected:1,161 Total number of objects backed up:0 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 299.09 KB Data transfer time:0.00 sec Network data transfer rate:93,701.96 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate:220.83 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:01 f1n15 /tsg/tsm Manuel Schweiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2002 10:29 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Have you checked if your password is still valid? If I am remembering right then 52 notes that your password has expired. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Greetings All, Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? f1n15 /tsg/tsmmore dsmerror.log 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from server 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z ' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 02.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with failur es. Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+405-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us .
Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52
Error 52 isn't a password prob. It looks like TSM server didn't respond fast enough to the client and the session was rejected. Try increasing your timeout limit. Could be a lot of stuff hitting the server at that time...aka backups. and the TSM Server is overloaded. Thanks, Robert Rippy. From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/20/2002 10:28 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 h .. If I start dsmc incr session , TSM won't ask me for password ,it starts backing up . Normal File-- 1,431 /etc/vfs [Sent] Normal File-- 101 /etc/xtab [Sent] Normal File-- 1,310 /etc/xtiso.conf [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/data [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/httpdlite [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/work [Sent] Normal File--62 /etc/IMNSearch/.imnhelp [Sent] ANS1898I * Processed 1,000 files * Total number of objects inspected:1,161 Total number of objects backed up:0 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 299.09 KB Data transfer time:0.00 sec Network data transfer rate:93,701.96 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate:220.83 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:01 f1n15 /tsg/tsm Manuel Schweiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2002 10:29 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Have you checked if your password is still valid? If I am remembering right then 52 notes that your password has expired. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Greetings All, Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? f1n15 /tsg/tsmmore dsmerror.log 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from server 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z ' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 02.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with failur es. Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+405-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us .
Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52
Check ur network on both sides and do ftp to check xfer rate . Else change ttl value for tcp/ip. Balanand Pinni SBC Services Inc. Work:314-206-5911 Pager:1-800-451-6897 Email ID :[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] e.mail pager -Original Message- From: Robert L. Rippy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Error 52 isn't a password prob. It looks like TSM server didn't respond fast enough to the client and the session was rejected. Try increasing your timeout limit. Could be a lot of stuff hitting the server at that time...aka backups. and the TSM Server is overloaded. Thanks, Robert Rippy. From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/20/2002 10:28 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 h .. If I start dsmc incr session , TSM won't ask me for password ,it starts backing up . Normal File-- 1,431 /etc/vfs [Sent] Normal File-- 101 /etc/xtab [Sent] Normal File-- 1,310 /etc/xtiso.conf [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/data [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/httpdlite [Sent] Directory-- 512 /etc/IMNSearch/work [Sent] Normal File--62 /etc/IMNSearch/.imnhelp [Sent] ANS1898I * Processed 1,000 files * Total number of objects inspected:1,161 Total number of objects backed up:0 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 299.09 KB Data transfer time:0.00 sec Network data transfer rate:93,701.96 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate:220.83 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:01 f1n15 /tsg/tsm Manuel Schweiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2002 10:29 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Have you checked if your password is still valid? If I am remembering right then 52 notes that your password has expired. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Greetings All, Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? f1n15 /tsg/tsmmore dsmerror.log 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from server 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z ' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 02.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with failur es. Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+405-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us .
Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52
Manuel, you are right , actlog shows that password has expired . in dsm.sys file I have passwordaccess=generate . Where is the password parameter? so that I can reset it ? when I add new node in tsm ,I do dsmc on client and enter password for the first time and tsm stores/uses it . ERRORLOGRETENTION 10,D PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE PASSWORDDIR /tsg/tsm/security SCHEDLOGNAME /tsg/tsm/dsmsched.log SCHEDLOGRETENTION 10,D tsm: TSMq actlog begindate=11/19/2002 begintime=06:00:00 endtime=07:40:00 Date/TimeMessage -- 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0406I Session 608 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47241)). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0425W Session 608 for node F1N15 (AIX) refused - password has expired. 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0403I Session 608 ended for node F1N15 (AIX). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0406I Session 609 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47242)). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0403I Session 609 ended for node F1N15 (AIX). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0406I Session 610 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47243)). 11/19/02 06:00:03 ANR0406I Session 611 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47244)). 11/19/02 06:00:05 ANR0403I Session 611 ended for node F1N15 (AIX). Manuel Schweiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2002 10:29 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Have you checked if your password is still valid? If I am remembering right then 52 notes that your password has expired. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Greetings All, Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? f1n15 /tsg/tsmmore dsmerror.log 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from server 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z ' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 02.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with failur es. Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+405-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us .
Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52
Shekhar, Normaly that should not happen when you use passwordaccess generate. Try to reset the client password in the admin webinterface. If this still does not work delete the tsm.pwd file (should be locate in /tsg/tsm/security directory as you set it up). Then the client should ask you to reenter the password in any case. Happens to me from time to time on novell clients. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:17 PM Subject: Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Manuel, you are right , actlog shows that password has expired . in dsm.sys file I have passwordaccess=generate . Where is the password parameter? so that I can reset it ? when I add new node in tsm ,I do dsmc on client and enter password for the first time and tsm stores/uses it . ERRORLOGRETENTION 10,D PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE PASSWORDDIR /tsg/tsm/security SCHEDLOGNAME /tsg/tsm/dsmsched.log SCHEDLOGRETENTION 10,D tsm: TSMq actlog begindate=11/19/2002 begintime=06:00:00 endtime=07:40:00 Date/TimeMessage -- 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0406I Session 608 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47241)). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0425W Session 608 for node F1N15 (AIX) refused - password has expired. 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0403I Session 608 ended for node F1N15 (AIX). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0406I Session 609 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47242)). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0403I Session 609 ended for node F1N15 (AIX). 11/19/02 06:00:01 ANR0406I Session 610 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47243)). 11/19/02 06:00:03 ANR0406I Session 611 started for node F1N15 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 192.168.99.15(47244)). 11/19/02 06:00:05 ANR0403I Session 611 ended for node F1N15 (AIX). Manuel Schweiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2002 10:29 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Have you checked if your password is still valid? If I am remembering right then 52 notes that your password has expired. regards, Manuel - Original Message - From: shekhar Dhotre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Server rejected session; result code: 52 Greetings All, Any idea what could cause TSM to error out ? f1n15 /tsg/tsmmore dsmerror.log 19-11-2002 06:00:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 52 19-11-2002 06:00:01 sessOpen: Error 52 receiving SignOnResp verb from server 20-11-2002 06:05:15 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/osdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/appdir_05112002.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:17 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/rootdir_06112002.Z ' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:29 ANS1228E Sending of object '/tsg/tsm/logs/dwetlappdir_051120 02.Z' failed 20-11-2002 06:05:33 ANS1803E Archive processing of '/tsg/*' finished with failur es. Thank You and Best regards. Shekhar Dhotre Midrange Engineer. lend lease Inc , Atlanta - 30346 PH: 1+405-846-7483 FAX:1+404-848-2887 Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED] visit Us at www.lendlease.com This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us .
result code ? - second try
Hi together, i asked this question a few days ago, but didnt get any responses...so I try it again ;-) since we have upgraded our TSM server from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5 on OS/390 2.10 we get result codes ? from the clients in some cases (clients are 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0). But i dont know why this happens? Anybody know where this code come from and why it did not have a known number? thanks in advance... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
Re: result code ? - second try
If you are referring to the STATUS of the Q EV output, then this means that the server contacted the client, the backup started, but never completed. This could be due to a network problem, the client server going down, or it's still running. Somewhere in the 4.1 maintenance Tivoli added this '?' status for events that have started, but haven't received any completion response from the client node. Further APARS I saw stated that actual descriptions were to be added instead of the generic '?'. Check the activity log for around the time the schedule started for that node to see if you have any errors. Like 'connection with client severed', or idle timeouts... Also, the status of '?' is NOT listed in a QUERY EVENT output with EX=YES. Bill Boyer DSS, Inc. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stumpf, Joachim Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: result code ? - second try Hi together, i asked this question a few days ago, but didnt get any responses...so I try it again ;-) since we have upgraded our TSM server from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5 on OS/390 2.10 we get result codes ? from the clients in some cases (clients are 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0). But i dont know why this happens? Anybody know where this code come from and why it did not have a known number? thanks in advance... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
result code ?
Hi together, since we have upgraded our TSM server from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5 on OS/390 2.10 we get result codes ? from the clients in some cases (clients are 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0). But i dont know why this happens? Anybody know where this code come from and why it did not have a known number? thanks in advance... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany
Re: cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 53
Hello Dwight, AFAIK and have observed within the last months this is the normal behaviour of the new multithreaded TSM client (= v3.7.2.x). The default value for the corresponding dsm.opt parameter RESOURCEUtilization is 2. So if you haven't set a different value, everytime the client contacts the server he opens two sessions: One for the control information, the other for the data. You can verify this by querying the client sessions on the server during a scheduled or manual backup. Depending on the number and the size of the changed files on the TSM client one session should have a relative small number of bytes received or sent and won't change much after the backup process itself has been initiated. The other session will transfer the data from the client to the server and will the number of bytes received should equal the size of the backed up files. This session will be closed before the control session (the data transfer is already over but the client still has to sent its results to the server). So, if you want just one session for both tasks specify RESOURCEUtilization 1 in the dsm.opt. And if you want five data sessions you would have to specify RESOURCEUtilization 6 in the client's option file. And regarding your question about the error message: Because every new client (v3.7 or 4.x) now uses two sessions maybe you have to increase the maxsessions parameter in your dsmserv.opt so the maximum number of scheduled sessions is also increased? And perhaps it is just happening what the error log says: The server rejects the session because there are no more sessions allowed to be opened? Just my 2 cents. Please correct me when I'm wrong. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Met vriendelijke groeten, With best regards, Bien amicalement, CU/2, Dirk Billerbeck Dirk Billerbeck GE CompuNet Kiel Enterprise Computing Solutions Am Jaegersberg 20, 24161 Altenholz (Kiel), Germany Phone: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 117, Fax: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 190, Internet: dirk.billerbeck @ gecits-eu.com This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this mail in error, please tell us immediately by return email and delete the document. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02.07.2001 19:58:02 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mailbox.dekelnsm cc: Subject: cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 53 -- Can't remember this one being mentioned and I didn't find anything on a search of adsm.org so I though I'd toss this to the group... anyone seen this in their client dsmerror.log ? 06/15/01 15:41:32 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 53 AIX 4.3.3 server running TSM 3.7.2 and the clients seem to mainly be sun solaris 6 with tsm 3.7.2.0 client code hugh amounts of zero activity sessions from client to server (they have nothing to do with the scheduler) 3,0,ADSM,07/01/2001,00:50:33,SUNDEV1,oracle,SUN SOLARIS,1,Tcp/Ip,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,3,7,7,0,0,4,0,0,0,0,7,2 3,0,ADSM,07/01/2001,11:31:32,TDCCDPD1,,SUN SOLARIS,1,Tcp/Ip,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,4,0,0,0,0,7,2 Even if root simply initiates a dsmc session and then does anything to contact the server (such as a q sched) it opens a session that terminates, writes the record to the dsmerror.log and then performs the desired action and gives the proper info back to the dsmc session BUT each action initiates at least two sessions. Is a little bit of a pain because after only being up for 45 days, this specific tsm server is on client session 985,043 The accounting log is rather large. I know... 4.1 or 4.2, I'll head there quick enough but this seems to have started out of the blue a couple months ago and I haven't figured it out yet... any thoughts ? Dwight
cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 53
Can't remember this one being mentioned and I didn't find anything on a search of adsm.org so I though I'd toss this to the group... anyone seen this in their client dsmerror.log ? 06/15/01 15:41:32 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; result code: 53 AIX 4.3.3 server running TSM 3.7.2 and the clients seem to mainly be sun solaris 6 with tsm 3.7.2.0 client code hugh amounts of zero activity sessions from client to server (they have nothing to do with the scheduler) 3,0,ADSM,07/01/2001,00:50:33,SUNDEV1,oracle,SUN SOLARIS,1,Tcp/Ip,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,3,7,7,0,0,4,0,0,0,0,7,2 3,0,ADSM,07/01/2001,11:31:32,TDCCDPD1,,SUN SOLARIS,1,Tcp/Ip,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,4,0,0,0,0,7,2 Even if root simply initiates a dsmc session and then does anything to contact the server (such as a q sched) it opens a session that terminates, writes the record to the dsmerror.log and then performs the desired action and gives the proper info back to the dsmc session BUT each action initiates at least two sessions. Is a little bit of a pain because after only being up for 45 days, this specific tsm server is on client session 985,043 The accounting log is rather large. I know... 4.1 or 4.2, I'll head there quick enough but this seems to have started out of the blue a couple months ago and I haven't figured it out yet... any thoughts ? Dwight
