Re: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power
That's obviously +48 though Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 9:14 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: So, why not say 48 VDC and leave it at that? If you add a polarity then you also imply ground reference. -Original Message- From: Daniel White Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:13 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power I'll confirm, Lumina is a floating ground. We say -48VDC since that is the telco standard (and some of our other radios are -48VDC only). *** Daniel White - Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com Skype: danieldwhite Social: LinkedIn *** -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power I thought all the SAF stuff was +48, but the CFIP Lumina FODU datasheet says -48? Is this the built-in DC-DC converter thing? I'm confused. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Re: [AFMUG] CPU on Mikrotik
My experience says anything over 30%is a possible issue. On Apr 28, 2015 11:59 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) r...@latrobeit.com.au wrote: Hi Guys I’m trying to find the slow point in part of my network. I have a rb2011 that has 70% cpu, to me that says I have room left. But could cpu that high be slowing me down? Space is a issue to replace it. Thanks Rhys
Re: [AFMUG] CPU on Mikrotik
70% is an average value. As Network traffic peaks/bursts you might be out of cpu for small portions of time and get packet loss/delays. RB2011 is not realy fast for routing. Using the internal Switch you can switch 1GB but as router it is much less. With 64byte packets you end up below 100M. Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Josh Luthman Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. April 2015 14:10 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] CPU on Mikrotik That's super high IMO. Are you graphing it? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 12:59 AM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) r...@latrobeit.com.au mailto:r...@latrobeit.com.au wrote: Hi Guys I’m trying to find the slow point in part of my network. I have a rb2011 that has 70% cpu, to me that says I have room left. But could cpu that high be slowing me down? Space is a issue to replace it. Thanks Rhys
Re: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power
I'll confirm, Lumina is a floating ground. We say -48VDC since that is the telco standard (and some of our other radios are -48VDC only). *** Daniel White - Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com Skype: danieldwhite Social: LinkedIn *** -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power I thought all the SAF stuff was +48, but the CFIP Lumina FODU datasheet says -48? Is this the built-in DC-DC converter thing? I'm confused. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Re: [AFMUG] CPU on Mikrotik
Throw a 850Gx2 in some of the places you need more horsepower and use that for backhauls only (No queues or firewall rules). Erich Kaiser North Central Tower er...@northcentraltower.com Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) r...@latrobeit.com.au wrote: Hi Guys I’m trying to find the slow point in part of my network. I have a rb2011 that has 70% cpu, to me that says I have room left. But could cpu that high be slowing me down? Space is a issue to replace it. Thanks Rhys
Re: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power
So, why not say 48 VDC and leave it at that? If you add a polarity then you also imply ground reference. -Original Message- From: Daniel White Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:13 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power I'll confirm, Lumina is a floating ground. We say -48VDC since that is the telco standard (and some of our other radios are -48VDC only). *** Daniel White - Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com Skype: danieldwhite Social: LinkedIn *** -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power I thought all the SAF stuff was +48, but the CFIP Lumina FODU datasheet says -48? Is this the built-in DC-DC converter thing? I'm confused. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Re: [AFMUG] CPU on Mikrotik
That's super high IMO. Are you graphing it? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 12:59 AM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) r...@latrobeit.com.au wrote: Hi Guys I’m trying to find the slow point in part of my network. I have a rb2011 that has 70% cpu, to me that says I have room left. But could cpu that high be slowing me down? Space is a issue to replace it. Thanks Rhys
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2598340 - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:02:46 PM Subject: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit. -- Forwarded message -- From: FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! To: cstann...@gmail.com Cc: A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.! It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS - Digital Transmission System). Full details on this application and possible product images can be found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141 If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :) Cheers, FCCID.NET
Re: [AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device
On the AP's bridge table you will see all MACs with their associated LUIDs. You will see one or two of the SM's MAC as well as any MACs seen through that radio. Alternately you can look at the individual SM's bridge table and see the same per-radio. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote: Does anyone have a quick way to determine the mac of a customer's router connected to the lan port of a Canopy/Cambium SM? I have a new client who has several hundred SM's running in bridge mode, but never collected the mac's of the end user devices. They hand out random public's via dhcp and throttle at the SM. They would like to start redirecting suspended users, but with NO information on either the ip or the mac of the end user, it is proving difficult. If there is a way to obtain the mac of the connected device on the lan side, it would be a lot easier than a site visit or a phone call to that many customers. Thanks, Cameron
Re: [AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device
I have no control over the networks so 82 wouldn't be an option. I'll take a look at an SM and see if I can get what I need from the bridging table. Thanks! Cameron On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote: Bridging table of the SM, assuming it is not doing NAT in the SM. I have only done it from the GUI, not sure if it can be done via SNMP. Probably would be better to do option 82 then could use MAC address of SM. *From:* Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:18 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* [AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device Does anyone have a quick way to determine the mac of a customer's router connected to the lan port of a Canopy/Cambium SM? I have a new client who has several hundred SM's running in bridge mode, but never collected the mac's of the end user devices. They hand out random public's via dhcp and throttle at the SM. They would like to start redirecting suspended users, but with NO information on either the ip or the mac of the end user, it is proving difficult. If there is a way to obtain the mac of the connected device on the lan side, it would be a lot easier than a site visit or a phone call to that many customers. Thanks, Cameron
Re: [AFMUG] our shiny new website
I'd use Radio Mobile and crap, I forgot what other tools I used. Sam Tetherow recommended a couple GDAL tools a week or two ago. Maybe I used GDAL, maybe I used some other GIS tools I have. http://beta.ics-il.com/coverage.html I'm thinking about adding some more things to the KML like tower locations, friendly fiber routes, etc. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: Graham McIntire gra...@vntx.net To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:18:36 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] our shiny new website Ty, What did you use to generate the service coverage area with Google maps? Graham On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: After hiring a new guy for tech support that turns out to be quite savvy at web-design, we turned him loose on our crappy website. We have been live with the new one for about a week and I am very pleased with it. Please check it out and let me know if you see anything of concern. www.zeecon.com -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] our shiny new website
We drew it by hand in Google Maps by tracing an overlaid picture of another coverage map we have. It really turned out great. I love how large it is. The search/pin function he programmed himself around the Maps API. It also saves that address and the result so that we can review what locations people are searching for and where we can possible grow into. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:21 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: that is a nice looking coverage map On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Graham McIntire gra...@vntx.net wrote: Ty, What did you use to generate the service coverage area with Google maps? Graham On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: After hiring a new guy for tech support that turns out to be quite savvy at web-design, we turned him loose on our crappy website. We have been live with the new one for about a week and I am very pleased with it. Please check it out and let me know if you see anything of concern. www.zeecon.com -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
“You are not authorized to access this page.” From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:13 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2598340 - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange https://twitter.com/mdwestix _ From: Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com mailto:cstann...@gmail.com To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:02:46 PM Subject: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit. -- Forwarded message -- From: FCCID.NET http://FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net mailto:i...@fccid.net Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! To: cstann...@gmail.com mailto:cstann...@gmail.com Cc: A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.! It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS - Digital Transmission System). Full details on this application and possible product images can be found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015 http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141 id=831141 If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :) Cheers, FCCID.NET http://FCCID.NET
Re: [AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device
bridging table? From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:18 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device Does anyone have a quick way to determine the mac of a customer's router connected to the lan port of a Canopy/Cambium SM? I have a new client who has several hundred SM's running in bridge mode, but never collected the mac's of the end user devices. They hand out random public's via dhcp and throttle at the SM. They would like to start redirecting suspended users, but with NO information on either the ip or the mac of the end user, it is proving difficult. If there is a way to obtain the mac of the connected device on the lan side, it would be a lot easier than a site visit or a phone call to that many customers. Thanks, Cameron
[AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device
Does anyone have a quick way to determine the mac of a customer's router connected to the lan port of a Canopy/Cambium SM? I have a new client who has several hundred SM's running in bridge mode, but never collected the mac's of the end user devices. They hand out random public's via dhcp and throttle at the SM. They would like to start redirecting suspended users, but with NO information on either the ip or the mac of the end user, it is proving difficult. If there is a way to obtain the mac of the connected device on the lan side, it would be a lot easier than a site visit or a phone call to that many customers. Thanks, Cameron
Re: [AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device
Bridging table of the SM, assuming it is not doing NAT in the SM. I have only done it from the GUI, not sure if it can be done via SNMP. Probably would be better to do option 82 then could use MAC address of SM. From: Cameron Crum Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:18 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device Does anyone have a quick way to determine the mac of a customer's router connected to the lan port of a Canopy/Cambium SM? I have a new client who has several hundred SM's running in bridge mode, but never collected the mac's of the end user devices. They hand out random public's via dhcp and throttle at the SM. They would like to start redirecting suspended users, but with NO information on either the ip or the mac of the end user, it is proving difficult. If there is a way to obtain the mac of the connected device on the lan side, it would be a lot easier than a site visit or a phone call to that many customers. Thanks, Cameron
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
I think it's the new pmp450 form factor Gino A. Villarini @gvillarini On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.commailto:cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit. -- Forwarded message -- From: FCCID.NEThttp://FCCID.NET i...@fccid.netmailto:i...@fccid.net Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! To: cstann...@gmail.commailto:cstann...@gmail.com Cc: A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.! It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS - Digital Transmission System). Full details on this application and possible product images can be found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141 If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :) Cheers, FCCID.NEThttp://FCCID.NET
[AFMUG] Ask the ePMP team anything
The ePMP development team is online now at the Cambium Community ready to respond to any questions that you may have. http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-1000/ePMP-Applications-Ask-the-Experts/m-p/40120#U40120 Be there. Aloha. Join the Conversation Cambium Networks Community Forumhttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com/
Re: [AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device
SNMP: enterprises.161.19.3.3.4.1.1 is the bridging table for both AP and SM's (at least on 13.1.3) -- Larry Smith lesm...@ecsis.net On Wed April 29 2015 11:45, Cameron Crum wrote: I have no control over the networks so 82 wouldn't be an option. I'll take a look at an SM and see if I can get what I need from the bridging table. Thanks! Cameron On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote: Bridging table of the SM, assuming it is not doing NAT in the SM. I have only done it from the GUI, not sure if it can be done via SNMP. Probably would be better to do option 82 then could use MAC address of SM. *From:* Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:18 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* [AFMUG] obtaining mac of connected device Does anyone have a quick way to determine the mac of a customer's router connected to the lan port of a Canopy/Cambium SM? I have a new client who has several hundred SM's running in bridge mode, but never collected the mac's of the end user devices. They hand out random public's via dhcp and throttle at the SM. They would like to start redirecting suspended users, but with NO information on either the ip or the mac of the end user, it is proving difficult. If there is a way to obtain the mac of the connected device on the lan side, it would be a lot easier than a site visit or a phone call to that many customers. Thanks, Cameron
[AFMUG] Rocket AC5 Lite question
Can't find where to hide SSID on these? Ideas? Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
New ePMP form factor. Connectorized.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 4/29/2015 10:42 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
https://www.facebook.com/mdwestixhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchangehttps://twitter.com/mdwestix
*From: *Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:16:10 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
“You are not authorized to access this page.”
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:13 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2598340
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
https://www.facebook.com/mdwestixhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchangehttps://twitter.com/mdwestix
*From: *Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
mailto:cstann...@gmail.com
*To: *af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:02:46 PM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small
dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit.
-- Forwarded message --
From: FCCID.NET http://FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net
mailto:i...@fccid.net
Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM
Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
To: cstann...@gmail.com mailto:cstann...@gmail.com
Cc:
A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.!
It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS -
Digital Transmission System).
Full details on this application and possible product images can be
found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141
If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :)
Cheers,
FCCID.NET http://FCCID.NET
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
you need up tilt so that it can bounce the connection off the satellite. isn't that how all wireless works?!?! /sarcasm On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
It doesn't look like it will be up that long mounted on that pole. The first stiff breeze outhgt to knock it over. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
hum..DTS? That's the description for FHSS higher speed modulation on 902-928 MHz radios for SCADA applications Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390 On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote: https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2598340 - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange https://twitter.com/mdwestix -- *From: *Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:02:46 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit. -- Forwarded message -- From: FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! To: cstann...@gmail.com Cc: A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.! It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS - Digital Transmission System). Full details on this application and possible product images can be found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141 If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :) Cheers, FCCID.NET
Re: [AFMUG] Rocket AC5 Lite question
Advanced tab iirc Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:47 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: Can't find where to hide SSID on these? Ideas? Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
Possible replacement for the bullet.. Go Cambium :)
On 04/29/2015 12:51 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
New ePMP form factor. Connectorized.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 4/29/2015 10:42 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
https://www.facebook.com/mdwestixhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchangehttps://twitter.com/mdwestix
*From: *Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:16:10 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks
inc.!
“You are not authorized to access this page.”
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:13 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks
inc.!
https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2598340
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
https://www.facebook.com/mdwestixhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchangehttps://twitter.com/mdwestix
*From: *Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
mailto:cstann...@gmail.com
*To: *af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:02:46 PM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small
dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit.
-- Forwarded message --
From: FCCID.NET http://FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net
mailto:i...@fccid.net
Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM
Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
To: cstann...@gmail.com mailto:cstann...@gmail.com
Cc:
A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.!
It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS
- Digital Transmission System).
Full details on this application and possible product images can be
found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141
If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :)
Cheers,
FCCID.NET http://FCCID.NET
Re: [AFMUG] our shiny new website
did all of this in his first week, right? :) where did he work before you hired him? sounds like a real find! um, wow, this is an old thread ya'll have revived. - Original Message - From: Ty Featherling To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] our shiny new website Me too. He has also created a bunch of printable guides and other literature for us. You can find all of that under printable resources. Good stuff. -Ty On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:08 PM, David dmilho...@wletc.com wrote: LIKE! Love the customer support area :) On 04/10/2015 02:23 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: After hiring a new guy for tech support that turns out to be quite savvy at web-design, we turned him loose on our crappy website. We have been live with the new one for about a week and I am very pleased with it. Please check it out and let me know if you see anything of concern. www.zeecon.com -Ty
[AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
Its all good its just ubiquity stuff LOL I really like their HF telephone pole they have On 04/29/2015 01:33 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
So ePMP in pmp450 form factor? Actually it will make more sense for reflector dishes stand point for sure. Tushar On Apr 29, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote: I think it's the new pmp450 form factor Gino A. Villarini @gvillarini On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit. -- Forwarded message -- From: FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! To: cstann...@gmail.com Cc: A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.! It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS - Digital Transmission System). Full details on this application and possible product images can be found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141 If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :) Cheers, FCCID.NET
Re: [AFMUG] our shiny new website
In his first few months, yes. He's not perfect by any stretch but he is very handy to have around. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:22 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote: did all of this in his first week, right? :) where did he work before you hired him? sounds like a real find! um, wow, this is an old thread ya'll have revived. - Original Message - *From:* Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com *To:* af@afmug.com *Sent:* Friday, April 10, 2015 3:18 PM *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] our shiny new website Me too. He has also created a bunch of printable guides and other literature for us. You can find all of that under printable resources. Good stuff. -Ty On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:08 PM, David dmilho...@wletc.com wrote: LIKE! Love the customer support area :) On 04/10/2015 02:23 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: After hiring a new guy for tech support that turns out to be quite savvy at web-design, we turned him loose on our crappy website. We have been live with the new one for about a week and I am very pleased with it. Please check it out and let me know if you see anything of concern. www.zeecon.com -Ty
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
Is it 802.11n or 802.11ac?
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:51 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
New ePMP form factor. Connectorized.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 4/29/2015 10:42 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/mdwestix
From: Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.orgmailto:p...@paulstewart.org
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:16:10 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
“You are not authorized to access this page.”
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:13 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2598340
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/mdwestix
From: Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.commailto:cstann...@gmail.com
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:02:46 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small dipoles,
so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit.
-- Forwarded message --
From: FCCID.NEThttp://FCCID.NET i...@fccid.netmailto:i...@fccid.net
Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM
Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
To: cstann...@gmail.commailto:cstann...@gmail.com
Cc:
A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.!
It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS - Digital
Transmission System).
Full details on this application and possible product images can be found at
http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141
If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :)
Cheers,
FCCID.NEThttp://FCCID.NET
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
there you go..a business opportunity Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390 On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Oh don't get me wrong at all Jaime, I don't have any problem with them using the band. I just pray they use it responsibly which, according to what I can see on the installation of these units, is not likely. Good news is I have a meeting with a Captain soon about a water tower we are building out and I intend to find out who to talk to about those radios. Might be able to offer some services in the name of making sure they play nice. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: These bands are not exclusive to WISPs. The police can use whatever they want or can afford like the rest of us. Always astounds me how much many WISPS complain about others using the free and unlicensed bands. Damn they opened more spectrum recently and if you cant make it work for you maybe you are not doing it right. I doubt many of you have the noise border towns like mine has and never once have you heard me complain about non Wisps using these bands. If we get noise we make changes. We tried 900 recently on mtn and it didn't work. We installed a small POP to service the area and moved on. Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 2:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
I think this will be the Force 200. On 4/29/2015 2:02 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: Interesting .. thanks… *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:42 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com https://www.facebook.com/mdwestixhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchangehttps://twitter.com/mdwestix *From: *Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org mailto:p...@paulstewart.org *To: *af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Sent: *Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:16:10 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! “You are not authorized to access this page.” *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:13 PM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2598340 - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com https://www.facebook.com/mdwestixhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchangehttps://twitter.com/mdwestix *From: *Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com mailto:cstann...@gmail.com *To: *af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Sent: *Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:02:46 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit. -- Forwarded message -- From: FCCID.NET http://FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net mailto:i...@fccid.net Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! To: cstann...@gmail.com mailto:cstann...@gmail.com Cc: A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.! It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS - Digital Transmission System). Full details on this application and possible product images can be found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141 If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :) Cheers, FCCID.NET http://FCCID.NET
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
I have no problem using the spectrum either. I will never complain about the use of it. However, I will complain about the irresponsible use of it. Vivint Wireless just moved into my area and killed the spectrum. I can barely sell a 5 Mb plan much less 20 because of all the noise. With that said, I am completely abandoning the 5GHz realm to avoid these issues. There are so many options now that I see no reason to just let Vivint have that space. I will be able to offer much higher speeds then them now anyway. Speaking of Vivint, anyone know how many areas they are in now? They took one of my customers and made it a hub home. That customer called me back within 3 weeks telling me that are in contract with them but still wanted me to reinstall my internet because it was faster. They were on a 15Mb plan. But because of all the noise I couldn't get them 1Mb. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: These bands are not exclusive to WISPs. The police can use whatever they want or can afford like the rest of us. Always astounds me how much many WISPS complain about others using the free and unlicensed bands. Damn they opened more spectrum recently and if you cant make it work for you maybe you are not doing it right. I doubt many of you have the noise border towns like mine has and never once have you heard me complain about non Wisps using these bands. If we get noise we make changes. We tried 900 recently on mtn and it didn't work. We installed a small POP to service the area and moved on. Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 2:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
802.11a, runs token ring and uses coax. Its their retro model
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
wrote:
Is it 802.11n or 802.11ac?
Rory
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:51 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
New ePMP form factor. Connectorized.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 4/29/2015 10:42 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
https://twitter.com/ICSIL
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix
https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange
https://twitter.com/mdwestix
--
*From: *Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org p...@paulstewart.org
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:16:10 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
“You are not authorized to access this page.”
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 1:13 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2598340
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
https://twitter.com/ICSIL
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix
https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange
https://twitter.com/mdwestix
--
*From: *Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:02:46 PM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small
dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit.
-- Forwarded message --
From: FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net
Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM
Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
To: cstann...@gmail.com
Cc:
A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.!
It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS -
Digital Transmission System).
Full details on this application and possible product images can be
found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141
If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :)
Cheers,
FCCID.NET
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
These bands are not exclusive to WISPs. The police can use whatever they want or can afford like the rest of us. Always astounds me how much many WISPS complain about others using the free and unlicensed bands. Damn they opened more spectrum recently and if you cant make it work for you maybe you are not doing it right. I doubt many of you have the noise border towns like mine has and never once have you heard me complain about non Wisps using these bands. If we get noise we make changes. We tried 900 recently on mtn and it didn't work. We installed a small POP to service the area and moved on. Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 2:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
Oh don't get me wrong at all Jaime, I don't have any problem with them using the band. I just pray they use it responsibly which, according to what I can see on the installation of these units, is not likely. Good news is I have a meeting with a Captain soon about a water tower we are building out and I intend to find out who to talk to about those radios. Might be able to offer some services in the name of making sure they play nice. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: These bands are not exclusive to WISPs. The police can use whatever they want or can afford like the rest of us. Always astounds me how much many WISPS complain about others using the free and unlicensed bands. Damn they opened more spectrum recently and if you cant make it work for you maybe you are not doing it right. I doubt many of you have the noise border towns like mine has and never once have you heard me complain about non Wisps using these bands. If we get noise we make changes. We tried 900 recently on mtn and it didn't work. We installed a small POP to service the area and moved on. Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 2:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
I never said the band belonged to us. Its a fiscal responsibility thing. They have spectrum set aside for them, so when they need the data its there. But they go cheap because of the upfront cost, but pay more in the long run in support costs. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: there you go..a business opportunity Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390 On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Oh don't get me wrong at all Jaime, I don't have any problem with them using the band. I just pray they use it responsibly which, according to what I can see on the installation of these units, is not likely. Good news is I have a meeting with a Captain soon about a water tower we are building out and I intend to find out who to talk to about those radios. Might be able to offer some services in the name of making sure they play nice. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: These bands are not exclusive to WISPs. The police can use whatever they want or can afford like the rest of us. Always astounds me how much many WISPS complain about others using the free and unlicensed bands. Damn they opened more spectrum recently and if you cant make it work for you maybe you are not doing it right. I doubt many of you have the noise border towns like mine has and never once have you heard me complain about non Wisps using these bands. If we get noise we make changes. We tried 900 recently on mtn and it didn't work. We installed a small POP to service the area and moved on. Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 2:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
I am helping a local WISP with noise from Vivint. We move they move right on top. I have mac address recorded. I will keep recording and handle it Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 3:24 PM, Brett A Mansfield li...@silverlakeinternet.com wrote: I have no problem using the spectrum either. I will never complain about the use of it. However, I will complain about the irresponsible use of it. Vivint Wireless just moved into my area and killed the spectrum. I can barely sell a 5 Mb plan much less 20 because of all the noise. With that said, I am completely abandoning the 5GHz realm to avoid these issues. There are so many options now that I see no reason to just let Vivint have that space. I will be able to offer much higher speeds then them now anyway. Speaking of Vivint, anyone know how many areas they are in now? They took one of my customers and made it a hub home. That customer called me back within 3 weeks telling me that are in contract with them but still wanted me to reinstall my internet because it was faster. They were on a 15Mb plan. But because of all the noise I couldn't get them 1Mb. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: These bands are not exclusive to WISPs. The police can use whatever they want or can afford like the rest of us. Always astounds me how much many WISPS complain about others using the free and unlicensed bands. Damn they opened more spectrum recently and if you cant make it work for you maybe you are not doing it right. I doubt many of you have the noise border towns like mine has and never once have you heard me complain about non Wisps using these bands. If we get noise we make changes. We tried 900 recently on mtn and it didn't work. We installed a small POP to service the area and moved on. Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 2:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
What options are you pursuing other than 5 GHz? Brett A Mansfield wrote: I have no problem using the spectrum either. I will never complain about the use of it. However, I will complain about the irresponsible use of it. Vivint Wireless just moved into my area and killed the spectrum. I can barely sell a 5 Mb plan much less 20 because of all the noise. With that said, I am completely abandoning the 5GHz realm to avoid these issues. There are so many options now that I see no reason to just let Vivint have that space. I will be able to offer much higher speeds then them now anyway. Speaking of Vivint, anyone know how many areas they are in now? They took one of my customers and made it a hub home. That customer called me back within 3 weeks telling me that are in contract with them but still wanted me to reinstall my internet because it was faster. They were on a 15Mb plan. But because of all the noise I couldn't get them 1Mb. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: These bands are not exclusive to WISPs. The police can use whatever they want or can afford like the rest of us. Always astounds me how much many WISPS complain about others using the free and unlicensed bands. Damn they opened more spectrum recently and if you cant make it work for you maybe you are not doing it right. I doubt many of you have the noise border towns like mine has and never once have you heard me complain about non Wisps using these bands. If we get noise we make changes. We tried 900 recently on mtn and it didn't work. We installed a small POP to service the area and moved on. Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 2:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us mailto:af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about.
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
911 I need help. What? I can't hear you. Which leg is severed? Hold on let me change channels so I can hear you. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 5:00 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: I am helping a local WISP with noise from Vivint. We move they move right on top. I have mac address recorded. I will keep recording and handle it Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 3:24 PM, Brett A Mansfield li...@silverlakeinternet.com wrote: I have no problem using the spectrum either. I will never complain about the use of it. However, I will complain about the irresponsible use of it. Vivint Wireless just moved into my area and killed the spectrum. I can barely sell a 5 Mb plan much less 20 because of all the noise. With that said, I am completely abandoning the 5GHz realm to avoid these issues. There are so many options now that I see no reason to just let Vivint have that space. I will be able to offer much higher speeds then them now anyway. Speaking of Vivint, anyone know how many areas they are in now? They took one of my customers and made it a hub home. That customer called me back within 3 weeks telling me that are in contract with them but still wanted me to reinstall my internet because it was faster. They were on a 15Mb plan. But because of all the noise I couldn't get them 1Mb. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: These bands are not exclusive to WISPs. The police can use whatever they want or can afford like the rest of us. Always astounds me how much many WISPS complain about others using the free and unlicensed bands. Damn they opened more spectrum recently and if you cant make it work for you maybe you are not doing it right. I doubt many of you have the noise border towns like mine has and never once have you heard me complain about non Wisps using these bands. If we get noise we make changes. We tried 900 recently on mtn and it didn't work. We installed a small POP to service the area and moved on. Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 2:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Uh-oh, this can't be good.
They are going get a Dragonwave set up since they are resellers I believe Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 4:00 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: I am helping a local WISP with noise from Vivint. We move they move right on top. I have mac address recorded. I will keep recording and handle it Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 3:24 PM, Brett A Mansfield li...@silverlakeinternet.com wrote: I have no problem using the spectrum either. I will never complain about the use of it. However, I will complain about the irresponsible use of it. Vivint Wireless just moved into my area and killed the spectrum. I can barely sell a 5 Mb plan much less 20 because of all the noise. With that said, I am completely abandoning the 5GHz realm to avoid these issues. There are so many options now that I see no reason to just let Vivint have that space. I will be able to offer much higher speeds then them now anyway. Speaking of Vivint, anyone know how many areas they are in now? They took one of my customers and made it a hub home. That customer called me back within 3 weeks telling me that are in contract with them but still wanted me to reinstall my internet because it was faster. They were on a 15Mb plan. But because of all the noise I couldn't get them 1Mb. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: These bands are not exclusive to WISPs. The police can use whatever they want or can afford like the rest of us. Always astounds me how much many WISPS complain about others using the free and unlicensed bands. Damn they opened more spectrum recently and if you cant make it work for you maybe you are not doing it right. I doubt many of you have the noise border towns like mine has and never once have you heard me complain about non Wisps using these bands. If we get noise we make changes. We tried 900 recently on mtn and it didn't work. We installed a small POP to service the area and moved on. Jaime Solorza On Apr 29, 2015 2:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I get irritated seeing municipalities using cheap shit in regular bands. I know it costs more to go to say 4.9 and quality gear costs more, but in the long run, the staff or outsourced IT support costs even out On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the same thing Lewis and Sean! Fingers-crossed, lol. -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: there must not be any wind in your area either since that airfiber is on the tippy top of a 10' pole with no guy wires or any thing. :-/ On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150429_121159.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7458727/20150403_144024.jpg -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Imgur! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 2:17 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Crap - they were too large. I'm scaling them down now. Please hold... -Ty On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: No picture Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 29, 2015 1:22 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Look what our local police department just had put up for a 0.8mile link. Check out the uptilt on that second radio. There is less than 40ft difference in elevation. I'm sure they will run them responsibly with only the channel width they need and sane power levels, right? Right? Nothing to worry about. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power
Probably because the next question is Is that negative or positive? On the other hand I agree. If the ground is floating, and I should but I don't remember, they could list it as either. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: So, why not say 48 VDC and leave it at that? If you add a polarity then you also imply ground reference. -Original Message- From: Daniel White Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:13 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power I'll confirm, Lumina is a floating ground. We say -48VDC since that is the telco standard (and some of our other radios are -48VDC only). *** Daniel White - Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com Skype: danieldwhite Social: LinkedIn *** -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] SAF Lumina power I thought all the SAF stuff was +48, but the CFIP Lumina FODU datasheet says -48? Is this the built-in DC-DC converter thing? I'm confused. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Re: [AFMUG] CPU on Mikrotik
Check the PPS. Its the biggest indicator that its bogging down and may not entirely reflect on the CPU graphs (if you are not doing any L7 or queue stuff). As someone else said sometimes you'll see the CPU at 30% and it will perform badly. The thing to watch is the PPS. - Original Message - From: Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) r...@latrobeit.com.au To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:59:22 AM Subject: [AFMUG] CPU on Mikrotik Hi Guys I'm trying to find the slow point in part of my network. I have a rb2011 that has 70% cpu, to me that says I have room left. But could cpu that high be slowing me down? Space is a issue to replace it. Thanks Rhys
Re: [AFMUG] our shiny new website
that is a nice looking coverage map On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Graham McIntire gra...@vntx.net wrote: Ty, What did you use to generate the service coverage area with Google maps? Graham On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: After hiring a new guy for tech support that turns out to be quite savvy at web-design, we turned him loose on our crappy website. We have been live with the new one for about a week and I am very pleased with it. Please check it out and let me know if you see anything of concern. www.zeecon.com -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Remote SNMP AC Meter?
Thanks for all the responses Gino A. Villarini President On 4/29/15, 11:17 AM, WaveDirect li...@wavedirect.org wrote: TED http://www.theenergydetective.com/ .. I used to have one.. bit expensive though. - Original Message - From: Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:10:18 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Remote SNMP AC Meter? Is it just to monitor your load, and make sure you're only using what you pay for, or does he want to actually do KWH billing off of it? I use several of the MFI-cs sensors to monitor current loads at sites, to make sure that someone else hasn't come and plugged into my outlet, and they work well. I'm not sure I'd trust them for billing purposes though. Nate On 4/29/2015 9:59 AM, D. Ryan Spott wrote: Whatever happened to the mFi-cs? http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/mfi/mFi_DS.pdf (page 12) ryan On 4/28/15 4:59 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: We have a rooftop that is requiring us to have a private AC meter. ï¿1Ž2I was thinking one with remote web or snmp capability so that the landlord can check it out. Any ideas? Gino A. Villarini President -- D. Ryan Spott | NGC457, llc broadband | telco | colo | communities PO Box 1734 Sultan, WA 98294 http://www.ngc457.com/
Re: [AFMUG] F*$%^% Microsoft!!!
Their paid software is as much of a disaster to deal with. They obfuscate their obfuscation using multiple levels of dual factor obfuscation On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Jon Bruce jbruce-af...@ptpbroadband.com wrote: Damn them and their free software. On 4/28/2015 12:32 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: +1 yup.. *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:40 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] F*$%^% Microsoft!!! Microsoft. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: It is insane to even have this problem, let alone there be such as stupid workaround to the stupid problem. Why not just make it that easy to begin with? -Ty On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: You're very welcome. Just remember to type redist after your search and you'll save your sanity. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: GOD BLESS YOU BROTHER! That worked fine. Had to turn off pop-up blocking still even though chrome never told me it was blocking a pop-up but I got it downloading now. Thanks Josh. -Ty On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Just put redistributable behind your search https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=42299 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I have been trying to download Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 2014 Express, which is FREE SOFTWARE for 2 whole hours now. No it is not a slow download.. well it might be but I have no idea since I have yet to even manage to start any downloads. the MSDN site is just leading me in circles. Click here to register and download, sign in to you Live.com account, enter your name and email address, select language, select which version you want to download, uncheck the i want spam options, click Contine to download.. Thanks for downloading! Here are some resources! F%$ you MS!! This is ridiculous. Anyone have the installer for SSMS 2014 or even for the full SQL Server 2014 Express? I even tried to find a torrent but couldn't. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] F*$%^% Microsoft!!!
I just can't see it... - Original Message - From: That One Guy /sarcasm To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] F*$%^% Microsoft!!! Their paid software is as much of a disaster to deal with. They obfuscate their obfuscation using multiple levels of dual factor obfuscation On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Jon Bruce jbruce-af...@ptpbroadband.com wrote: Damn them and their free software. On 4/28/2015 12:32 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: +1 yup.. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:40 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] F*$%^% Microsoft!!! Microsoft. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: It is insane to even have this problem, let alone there be such as stupid workaround to the stupid problem. Why not just make it that easy to begin with? -Ty On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: You're very welcome. Just remember to type redist after your search and you'll save your sanity. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: GOD BLESS YOU BROTHER! That worked fine. Had to turn off pop-up blocking still even though chrome never told me it was blocking a pop-up but I got it downloading now. Thanks Josh. -Ty On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Just put redistributable behind your search https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=42299 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I have been trying to download Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 2014 Express, which is FREE SOFTWARE for 2 whole hours now. No it is not a slow download.. well it might be but I have no idea since I have yet to even manage to start any downloads. the MSDN site is just leading me in circles. Click here to register and download, sign in to you Live.com account, enter your name and email address, select language, select which version you want to download, uncheck the i want spam options, click Contine to download.. Thanks for downloading! Here are some resources! F%$ you MS!! This is ridiculous. Anyone have the installer for SSMS 2014 or even for the full SQL Server 2014 Express? I even tried to find a torrent but couldn't. -Ty -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Looks like a great deal on a backup gen
It's inside a shed that we have all of our gear in at the site with the exhaust plumbed to the outside. Honestly, we used a 4 Pellet Stove vent and screwed it to the end of the exhaust pipe on the generator. Not the prettiest thing in the world, but works fine. On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote: Those guys that have one on of these on the Packetflux controller, How are you weathersealing the generator? Did you build a small enclosure around it? Put it in a building and plumb the exhaust? I'm guessing it's not just setting out to the weather with the plugs and controls exposed on the side. Nate On 4/28/2015 10:30 AM, Rob Genovesi wrote: It says it's CARB approved for all 50 states (and national parks): http://portablegeneratorguide.com/duromax-xp4850eh-dual-fuel-review/ Steve - are you able to do remote start/stop through PacketFlux? -Rob On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Can't be sold in California. It doesn't meet that CARB garbage so the rest of the country can benefit. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote: Did a container fall off a boat? On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, SmarterBroadband li...@smarterbroadband.com wrote: I did order one. Adam  *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Utick *Sent:* Monday, April 27, 2015 5:35 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looks like a great deal on a backup gen  We've got almost that exact same generator at one of our solar sites hooked up to a PacketFlux Generator controller for backup power in the event we don't have enough solar.  Has been running great there so far.  On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:52 PM, SmarterBroadband li...@smarterbroadband.com wrote: http://www.ebay.com/itm/DuroMax-XP4850EH-Hybrid-Portable-Dual-Fuel-Propane-Gas-Camping-RV-Generator/171503114601?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item27ee61d969  Adam Â
Re: [AFMUG] Looks like a great deal on a backup gen
Just do what we did, and hook it up to a 250 gallon tank sitting next to the building. ;-) On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: How would I calculate estimated run time per tank of fuel for this? -Ty On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I doubt it but it's the questions I don't ask or think I know that always seem to get me. -Ty On Apr 28, 2015 12:34 PM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote: On 4/28/15 8:40, Ty Featherling wrote: Is there any concern about sine vs square wave output on something like this? I want to get one but don't want to run into a gotcha I am unfamiliar with. It looks like an alternator. Is it even possible for a rotating alternator to output a square wave? ~Seth
Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration
I’m seeing good results with RM5AC in regards to interference and weak signals.. Probably 4x better than RM5 radios. -Peter From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 8:37 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration Depending on what vendor is doing the testing the results are different. Really hard to decide if I’m upgrading or side grading. Not so keen on the AC stuff, seems not to like interference and need super strong signal. Thanks Rhys From: Josh Reynolds [mailto:j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2015 1:34 PM To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com ; Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration Its the same chip :P That aside, have not, so I'll back out of this now. On April 29, 2015 7:31:54 PM AKDT, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) r...@latrobeit.com.au mailto:r...@latrobeit.com.au wrote: Hello Have many of you Migrated from an Airmax network to ePMP? I can’t decide if I should take the plunge. I have about 2000 customers, any Rocket with about 50+ customers is staring to bend. Any thought please? Thanks :-) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
[AFMUG] Fwd: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.!
Looking at the pictures it's a tiny module with gigabit and two small dipoles, so this would be the feed horn for their new force 110 PTP unit. -- Forwarded message -- From: FCCID.NET i...@fccid.net Date: Apr 29, 2015 10:19 AM Subject: New FCC Application for Cambium Networks inc.! To: cstann...@gmail.com Cc: A new FCC Application has just gone through for Cambium Networks inc.! It appears to be for a Dual Channel OFDM MIMO/SISO Transceiver (TS - Digital Transmission System). Full details on this application and possible product images can be found at http://fccid.net/number.php?fcc=Z8H89FT0015id=831141 If you blog this news, please include us as a reference. :) Cheers, FCCID.NET
Re: [AFMUG] Looks like a great deal on a backup gen
Yes, absolutely. Had to build a custom harness to hook to the start wires, etc. and used a door lock solenoid to operate the choke on it. We also put in an electric propane shut-off valve that's controlled by the generator controller as well. Works pretty slick once we got it all done. We can manually start it if we want, or we have it set to monitor the battery voltage on the battery array. If it gets to low, it automatically starts the generator and runs the AC Charger on them for a couple of hours. On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Rob Genovesi r...@corp.coastside.net wrote: It says it's CARB approved for all 50 states (and national parks): http://portablegeneratorguide.com/duromax-xp4850eh-dual-fuel-review/ Steve - are you able to do remote start/stop through PacketFlux? -Rob On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Can't be sold in California. It doesn't meet that CARB garbage so the rest of the country can benefit. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote: Did a container fall off a boat? On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, SmarterBroadband li...@smarterbroadband.com wrote: I did order one. Adam *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Utick *Sent:* Monday, April 27, 2015 5:35 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Looks like a great deal on a backup gen We've got almost that exact same generator at one of our solar sites hooked up to a PacketFlux Generator controller for backup power in the event we don't have enough solar. Has been running great there so far. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:52 PM, SmarterBroadband li...@smarterbroadband.com wrote: http://www.ebay.com/itm/DuroMax-XP4850EH-Hybrid-Portable-Dual-Fuel-Propane-Gas-Camping-RV-Generator/171503114601?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item27ee61d969 Adam
Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration
This is a conundrum I’ve been battling with a client of ours. The newer Rockets with XW firmware can handle more clients but run into random lockups. The only difference between them and the Titanium’s is the port. The ePMP isn’t sexy but it does work and can handle more than 50 clients at the AP plus comes with GPS. Rocket AC’s may not need GPS as badly but their firmware is still beta and I haven’t seen any data from anyone with 4 on a tower. We won’t deploy them until they are backward compatible with 802.11n and there is a smaller CPE than the PowerBeam-AC.Mimosa isn’t out yet with PTMP so that option is out. Our client deployed Ubiquiti Rockets in 1 city but is deploying Cambium ePMP in the next city. We just deployed a tower over the weekend and used Rocket 5Ms with RF Armor shields but we won’t have density issues for a few months. We may replace it with Mimosa or Rocket AC’s if the compatibility issue gets resolved. Forklifting the entire area isn’t financially feasible for the revenue. But I do expect multiple options to be compatible with 802.11n at the AP level in a few months and that’s what we are planning for. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 8:37 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration Depending on what vendor is doing the testing the results are different. Really hard to decide if I’m upgrading or side grading. Not so keen on the AC stuff, seems not to like interference and need super strong signal. Thanks Rhys From: Josh Reynolds [mailto:j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2015 1:34 PM To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com; Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration Its the same chip :P That aside, have not, so I'll back out of this now. On April 29, 2015 7:31:54 PM AKDT, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) r...@latrobeit.com.aumailto:r...@latrobeit.com.au wrote: Hello Have many of you Migrated from an Airmax network to ePMP? I can’t decide if I should take the plunge. I have about 2000 customers, any Rocket with about 50+ customers is staring to bend. Any thought please? Thanks :-) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration
Its the same chip :P That aside, have not, so I'll back out of this now. On April 29, 2015 7:31:54 PM AKDT, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) r...@latrobeit.com.au wrote: Hello Have many of you Migrated from an Airmax network to ePMP? I can't decide if I should take the plunge. I have about 2000 customers, any Rocket with about 50+ customers is staring to bend. Any thought please? Thanks :-) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration
Depending on what vendor is doing the testing the results are different. Really hard to decide if I’m upgrading or side grading. Not so keen on the AC stuff, seems not to like interference and need super strong signal. Thanks Rhys From: Josh Reynolds [mailto:j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2015 1:34 PM To: af@afmug.com; Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration Its the same chip :P That aside, have not, so I'll back out of this now. On April 29, 2015 7:31:54 PM AKDT, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) r...@latrobeit.com.au wrote: Hello Have many of you Migrated from an Airmax network to ePMP? I can’t decide if I should take the plunge. I have about 2000 customers, any Rocket with about 50+ customers is staring to bend. Any thought please? Thanks :-) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
[AFMUG] Rocket to ePMP migration
Hello Have many of you Migrated from an Airmax network to ePMP? I can't decide if I should take the plunge. I have about 2000 customers, any Rocket with about 50+ customers is staring to bend. Any thought please? Thanks :-)
Re: [AFMUG] Remote SNMP AC Meter?
Is it just to monitor your load, and make sure you're only using what you pay for, or does he want to actually do KWH billing off of it? I use several of the MFI-cs sensors to monitor current loads at sites, to make sure that someone else hasn't come and plugged into my outlet, and they work well. I'm not sure I'd trust them for billing purposes though. Nate On 4/29/2015 9:59 AM, D. Ryan Spott wrote: Whatever happened to the mFi-cs? http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/mfi/mFi_DS.pdf (page 12) ryan On 4/28/15 4:59 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: We have a rooftop that is requiring us to have a private AC meter. �I was thinking one with remote web or snmp capability so that the landlord can check it out. Any ideas? Gino A. Villarini President -- D. Ryan Spott | NGC457, llc broadband | telco | colo | communities PO Box 1734 Sultan, WA 98294 http://www.ngc457.com/
Re: [AFMUG] Remote SNMP AC Meter?
Whatever happened to the mFi-cs? http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/mfi/mFi_DS.pdf (page 12) ryan On 4/28/15 4:59 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: We have a rooftop that is requiring us to have a private AC meter. I was thinking one with remote web or snmp capability so that the landlord can check it out. Any ideas? Gino A. Villarini President -- D. Ryan Spott | NGC457, llc broadband | telco | colo | communities PO Box 1734 Sultan, WA 98294 http://www.ngc457.com/
Re: [AFMUG] Remote SNMP AC Meter?
TED http://www.theenergydetective.com/ .. I used to have one.. bit expensive though. - Original Message - From: Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:10:18 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Remote SNMP AC Meter? Is it just to monitor your load, and make sure you're only using what you pay for, or does he want to actually do KWH billing off of it? I use several of the MFI-cs sensors to monitor current loads at sites, to make sure that someone else hasn't come and plugged into my outlet, and they work well. I'm not sure I'd trust them for billing purposes though. Nate On 4/29/2015 9:59 AM, D. Ryan Spott wrote: Whatever happened to the mFi-cs? http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/mfi/mFi_DS.pdf (page 12) ryan On 4/28/15 4:59 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: We have a rooftop that is requiring us to have a private AC meter. �I was thinking one with remote web or snmp capability so that the landlord can check it out. Any ideas? Gino A. Villarini President -- D. Ryan Spott | NGC457, llc broadband | telco | colo | communities PO Box 1734 Sultan, WA 98294 http://www.ngc457.com/
