Re: [AFMUG] Restating the AFMUG List change process
Knowing Paul, he'd probably prefer that you make a donation to one of the non-profit organizations he supports. I know he took a missions/aid trip to Haiti not too long ago. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com On Dec 31, 2014, at 1:24 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I think he'd be too drunk to run the list... lol - Original Message - From: Chuck McCown via Af To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Restating the AFMUGList change process I think we all owe you a beer at AF. From: Paul McCall via Af Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 6:06 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Restating the AFMUG List change process Friday is the day that we have scheduled to actually “flip the switch” to running off the different header format. Sorry if that was confusing. Step 1 - get as many people pre-Amazon Authorized as possible. We sent out the Amazon Verification email yesterday. My understanding is that it is only good for 24 hours. So, after that 24 period ends today, we will send another one out to those that haven’t gotten authorized, at the end of today. That is a manual process on our end, so we will do it just the one last time. Step 2 - Friday (before noon EST) we will flip the switch. The header format will change after that time. We will monitor it to make sure everything is doing what it is supposed to. Un-Verified subscribers of the list will still be able to read the list, but not send to the list. If they want to generate the Amazon verification email because perhaps they missed the timing on the emails sent this week, they can send an email to af-unsubscr...@afmug.com, get OFF the list, and re-subscribe (af-subscr...@afmug.com ) then they will get the Amazon verification email and then the AFMUG verification email. The person who generates the most complaints to the process on the list is required to my all my beer at AFMUG. J Paul McCall, Pres. PDMNet / Florida Broadband 658 Old Dixie Highway Vero Beach, FL 32962 772-564-6800 office 772-473-0352 cell www.pdmnet.com pa...@pdmnet.net
Re: [AFMUG] Animal Farm Hotel info - UPDATE
Shuttle this year or should we rent a van again? ;-) Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com On Dec 29, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Traci via Af af@afmug.com wrote: They are changing from the Shilo to the Holiday Inn. We have had multiple people tell us that when they call to reserve they are told that the hotel will not be open until mid-February. The hotel manager has assured us many time that is not the case. But if people can't call and reserve then we have a problem. If you can get through to someone there who will take your reservation then great, but we figured we had better have an alternative lined up. On 12/29/2014 4:28 PM, Nate Burke via Af wrote: I see you've taken the shilo/holiday inn completely off the afmug page now. Was there some problem with it, or were they full? On 12/29/2014 12:44 PM, Traci via Af wrote: We have secured another hotel for AF attendees. Years ago we used this hotel, since it has been completely renovated. The Ramada Inn is just West of the Fairpark and is a free Trax ride to the show. It is also on the Airport Trax line, so you can go from the airport directly to the hotel. $80 per night is the rate and includes a continental breakfast and free internet. Of course you can stay anywhere you wish, there are many nice hotels in downtown Salt Lake City. This is just an option. Ramada Inn 1659 West North Temple 801-533-9000 We will update the website today with this information as well. Thanks - see you in a few weeks! Traci
Re: [AFMUG] OT Linkedin
It only does that if you (at least in Apple IOS) if you tell it to. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com On Dec 25, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Eric Kuhnke via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I refuse to use LinkedIn since the news that it randomly steals your entire iOS / Android contact list and auto spams everyone. Such BS. On Dec 25, 2014 4:19 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote: I wish there was a way to un-endorse certain people...
Re: [AFMUG] OT.... Illegal ice phone call
No one from the north would ever make that call... :-) Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com On Dec 17, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Dennis Burgess via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Wow! Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Greg Osborn via Af Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 9:57 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT Illegal ice phone call http://www.whitecountysheriff.org/files/911-Call.mp3 -- Thank you, Greg Osborn Tech Support and Field Service Manager OnlyInternet.Net 1.800.363.0989 image001.png image002.png image003.jpg
Re: [AFMUG] I have personally done this
That kid will never have kids! Creative use of a microwave oven though. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com On Nov 26, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g91xkISmp2g Turn captions on, set translation to English.
Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
The 110 PTP unit has sync on board...disabled...expect that's to keep us from buying that unit and swapping the radios for a connectorized unit without sync. :-) I expect that, like the connectorized radio without sync, that you can take sync from a different source, like a CMM4. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com On Nov 22, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com wrote: For Cambium we have a very remote tower that feeds several other towers. Everything is OSPF but logically... Tower R (the main remote tower - a 190 ft. Rohn 25G with several anti-twist devices) is fed by... Tower A - 26 miles away - UBNT 3.65ghz Rocket M5 AND a Mikrotik RB912 5 Ghz This commercial tower (Tower A) has over 300Mbit of usable bandwidth and feeds about 75 to 85 Mbit to Tower A Tower B - 9 miles away - UBNT 5ghz Rocket M5 This tower (Tower B) is a 90 ft. Rohn 25G Tower R then feeds... Tower C - 12 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 50 Mbit of usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) Tower D - 15 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) Tower E - 17 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) Tower F - 14 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) To get all this to work without Sync was quite a frequency juggling act. There are other towers in the area and towers C, D, E, F connect (chain) to each other on the back side and we use a couple 3.65Ghz UBNT radios on the backside links. The challenge... First of all, I need more BW to each tower, but mostly Tower C. And, I need better consistency... at times the links do not perform as I expect and then I get customer complaints etc. I hate that. So, what would be the best solution that Cambium can recommend other than a ton of licensed links? Obviously, the gear I am using now is inexpensive. The PTP110 solution ... 2ms unsyncedcan it sync, now or tomorrow? Latency with sync? Paul -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force Hi, Please allow me to clarify. The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 10/100 FE ports. The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the single GigE port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary PoE. GPS capabilities will be disabled (but the radio can still use the on board GPS chip to track satellites and provide coordinates). The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in Release 2.4 and will apply to both products. Reading this spec sheet. http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/files/PRODUCTS/ePMP/FORCE/Force%20110%20PTP_Oct2014.pdf LATENCY (nominal, one way) 2 ms (PTP Mode), 6 ms (Flexible Frame Mode) , 17 ms (GPS Sync Mode)
Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
That's what I learned in training this week. There are known issues with the CMM3 and ePMP, but there is a workaround. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com wrote: Jeff, It looks like you are saying that the connectorized radios withouth sync CAN indeed get sync from external source, CMM3, CMM4, sync injector. I wasn’t aware that was the case From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists via Af Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force The 110 PTP unit has sync on board...disabled...expect that's to keep us from buying that unit and swapping the radios for a connectorized unit without sync. :-) I expect that, like the connectorized radio without sync, that you can take sync from a different source, like a CMM4. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com On Nov 22, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Paul McCall via Af af@afmug.com wrote: For Cambium we have a very remote tower that feeds several other towers. Everything is OSPF but logically... Tower R (the main remote tower - a 190 ft. Rohn 25G with several anti-twist devices) is fed by... Tower A - 26 miles away - UBNT 3.65ghz Rocket M5 AND a Mikrotik RB912 5 Ghz This commercial tower (Tower A) has over 300Mbit of usable bandwidth and feeds about 75 to 85 Mbit to Tower A Tower B - 9 miles away - UBNT 5ghz Rocket M5 This tower (Tower B) is a 90 ft. Rohn 25G Tower R then feeds... Tower C - 12 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 50 Mbit of usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) Tower D - 15 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) Tower E - 17 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) Tower F - 14 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable bandwidth. (Rohn 25G 120 ft.) To get all this to work without Sync was quite a frequency juggling act. There are other towers in the area and towers C, D, E, F connect (chain) to each other on the back side and we use a couple 3.65Ghz UBNT radios on the backside links. The challenge... First of all, I need more BW to each tower, but mostly Tower C. And, I need better consistency... at times the links do not perform as I expect and then I get customer complaints etc. I hate that. So, what would be the best solution that Cambium can recommend other than a ton of licensed links? Obviously, the gear I am using now is inexpensive. The PTP110 solution ... 2ms unsyncedcan it sync, now or tomorrow? Latency with sync? Paul -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force Hi, Please allow me to clarify. The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 10/100 FE ports. The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the single GigE port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary PoE. GPS capabilities will be disabled (but the radio can still use the on board GPS chip to track satellites and provide coordinates). The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in Release 2.4 and will apply to both products. Reading this spec sheet. http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/files/PRODUCTS/ePMP/FORCE/Force%20110%20PTP_Oct2014.pdf LATENCY (nominal, one way) 2 ms (PTP Mode), 6 ms (Flexible Frame Mode) , 17 ms (GPS Sync Mode)
