Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt
http://bgp.potaroo.net/v6/as2.0/ We were at 25,000 in the FIB table size just a few weeks ago and now pushing 27,000. v6 adoption is important! On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: > Not really a great article in my opinion but at least Matt pushed on the > fact that IPv6 adoption is important. There are way too many ISP’s still > with their head in the sand with this … > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Sunday, January 3, 2016 9:29 PM > *To:* Animal Farm > *Subject:* [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt > > > > > http://www.networkworld.com/article/301/internet-of-things/what-you-need-to-know-about-ipv6-in-2016.html?google_editors_picks=true >
Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt
Whats wrong with the sand? I love that our limited IP4 space has pushed us to adopt 20th century technologies and topologies here On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: > Yeah that’s true… for ISP’s that provide routers to customers then they > need to support it too … but I don’t see that as a major stumbling block > (although a lot of consumer routers are complete crap) … > > > > This started with ISP’s blaming content providers for not having enough > IPv6 reachable sites .. the major content providers all stepped up and > became IPv6 reachable… now it’s back to the ISP’s in my opinion… > > > > Here in Canada, my $$$job is one of the few ISP’s doing IPv6 on scale and > it’s a sad situation > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof > *Sent:* Monday, January 4, 2016 9:37 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same > Matt > > > > I think this goes hand-in-hand with ISP provided routers. I would not > want to deal with IPv6 and bring-your-own-router. > > > > > > *From:* Paul Stewart > > *Sent:* Monday, January 04, 2016 8:13 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same > Matt > > > > Not really a great article in my opinion but at least Matt pushed on the > fact that IPv6 adoption is important. There are way too many ISP’s still > with their head in the sand with this … > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On > Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Sunday, January 3, 2016 9:29 PM > *To:* Animal Farm > *Subject:* [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt > > > > > http://www.networkworld.com/article/301/internet-of-things/what-you-need-to-know-about-ipv6-in-2016.html?google_editors_picks=true > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt
Yeah that’s true… for ISP’s that provide routers to customers then they need to support it too … but I don’t see that as a major stumbling block (although a lot of consumer routers are complete crap) … This started with ISP’s blaming content providers for not having enough IPv6 reachable sites .. the major content providers all stepped up and became IPv6 reachable… now it’s back to the ISP’s in my opinion… Here in Canada, my $$$job is one of the few ISP’s doing IPv6 on scale and it’s a sad situation From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof Sent: Monday, January 4, 2016 9:37 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt I think this goes hand-in-hand with ISP provided routers. I would not want to deal with IPv6 and bring-your-own-router. From: <mailto:p...@paulstewart.org> Paul Stewart Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 8:13 AM To: <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt Not really a great article in my opinion but at least Matt pushed on the fact that IPv6 adoption is important. There are way too many ISP’s still with their head in the sand with this … From: Af [ <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2016 9:29 PM To: Animal Farm < <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt http://www.networkworld.com/article/301/internet-of-things/what-you-need-to-know-about-ipv6-in-2016.html?google_editors_picks=true
Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt
I think this goes hand-in-hand with ISP provided routers. I would not want to deal with IPv6 and bring-your-own-router. From: Paul Stewart Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 8:13 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt Not really a great article in my opinion but at least Matt pushed on the fact that IPv6 adoption is important. There are way too many ISP’s still with their head in the sand with this … From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2016 9:29 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt http://www.networkworld.com/article/301/internet-of-things/what-you-need-to-know-about-ipv6-in-2016.html?google_editors_picks=true
Re: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt
Not really a great article in my opinion but at least Matt pushed on the fact that IPv6 adoption is important. There are way too many ISP’s still with their head in the sand with this … From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2016 9:29 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt http://www.networkworld.com/article/301/internet-of-things/what-you-need-to-know-about-ipv6-in-2016.html?google_editors_picks=true
[AFMUG] What you need to know about IPv6 in 2016 not same Matt
http://www.networkworld.com/article/301/internet-of-things/what-you-need-to-know-about-ipv6-in-2016.html?google_editors_picks=true
