Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Steve D
Heh... I got to troubleshoot an Optaphone last summer.  Absolutely nothing
wrong with the equipment, just a n connector that wasn't sealed properly by
the operators doing their own maintenance or something and took on some
water.  I recall that it had been installed circa 2002 in this particular
application but some documentation on it indicated the hardware was older
than that.  Having zero prior experience I was trying to find any info I
could, don't think I figured out exactly how to read rx levels.

-Steve D

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:

 We installed Optophones in Santa Ana and Coleman Texas!!!  Damn small
 world

 Jaime Solorza
 On Feb 21, 2015 3:13 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   I know a guy that used to modify cordless phones back in about 1990.
 Garberville California.  His name was Nat.  He could get 5 miles out of
 those things.  At the time Jim Carlson was selling TVs and hot tubs.  Jim
 decided to make a higher powered (2 watts) UHF version called the
 OptaPhone.  I bought one of the first OptaPhones.  Immediately told him how
 it needed to be improved and then went to work for him.  (that was during
 one of my many breaks from the Beehive crows).

  *From:* Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, February 21, 2015 11:27 AM
 *To:* Animal Farm af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

  speaking of legal.   I hear the Mennonites in Cuahtemoc Chih have their
 own long range cordless telephone system using 200=300MHz systems from
 Senao/Engenius with 100 ft. towers.  they use as two way radio as well.

  Jaime Solorza
 Wireless Systems Architect
 915-861-1390

 On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  My take on it is that it is a semi-off-the-shelf way to do broadband
 in the 420-450 MHz band.  Might have twice the foliage-penetrating
 capability of 900 MHz.

 bp
 part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


  On 2/21/2015 9:59 AM, Paul McCall wrote:

  Jaime,



 Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?



 What, exactly, can we do with this?



 Jaime Solorza

 On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html

 Jaime Solorza

 Wireless Systems Architect

 915-861-1390









Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Jaime Solorza
We installed Optophones in Santa Ana and Coleman Texas!!!  Damn small world

Jaime Solorza
On Feb 21, 2015 3:13 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

   I know a guy that used to modify cordless phones back in about 1990.
 Garberville California.  His name was Nat.  He could get 5 miles out of
 those things.  At the time Jim Carlson was selling TVs and hot tubs.  Jim
 decided to make a higher powered (2 watts) UHF version called the
 OptaPhone.  I bought one of the first OptaPhones.  Immediately told him how
 it needed to be improved and then went to work for him.  (that was during
 one of my many breaks from the Beehive crows).

  *From:* Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, February 21, 2015 11:27 AM
 *To:* Animal Farm af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

  speaking of legal.   I hear the Mennonites in Cuahtemoc Chih have their
 own long range cordless telephone system using 200=300MHz systems from
 Senao/Engenius with 100 ft. towers.  they use as two way radio as well.

  Jaime Solorza
 Wireless Systems Architect
 915-861-1390

 On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:

  My take on it is that it is a semi-off-the-shelf way to do broadband
 in the 420-450 MHz band.  Might have twice the foliage-penetrating
 capability of 900 MHz.

 bp
 part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


  On 2/21/2015 9:59 AM, Paul McCall wrote:

  Jaime,



 Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?



 What, exactly, can we do with this?



 Jaime Solorza

 On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html

 Jaime Solorza

 Wireless Systems Architect

 915-861-1390








Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Chuck McCown
I know a guy that used to modify cordless phones back in about 1990.  
Garberville California.  His name was Nat.  He could get 5 miles out of those 
things.  At the time Jim Carlson was selling TVs and hot tubs.  Jim decided to 
make a higher powered (2 watts) UHF version called the OptaPhone.  I bought one 
of the first OptaPhones.  Immediately told him how it needed to be improved and 
then went to work for him.  (that was during one of my many breaks from the 
Beehive crows).  

From: Jaime Solorza 
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 11:27 AM
To: Animal Farm 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

speaking of legal.   I hear the Mennonites in Cuahtemoc Chih have their own 
long range cordless telephone system using 200=300MHz systems from 
Senao/Engenius with 100 ft. towers.  they use as two way radio as well.   

Jaime Solorza 
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:

  My take on it is that it is a semi-off-the-shelf way to do broadband in the 
420-450 MHz band.  Might have twice the foliage-penetrating capability of 900 
MHz.


bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com

On 2/21/2015 9:59 AM, Paul McCall wrote:

Jaime,



Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?



What, exactly, can we do with this?



Jaime Solorza

On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:

http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html


Jaime Solorza

Wireless Systems Architect

915-861-1390







Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Bill Prince
My take on it is that it is a semi-off-the-shelf way to do broadband 
in the 420-450 MHz band. Might have twice the foliage-penetrating 
capability of 900 MHz.


bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com

On 2/21/2015 9:59 AM, Paul McCall wrote:


Jaime,

Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?

What, exactly, can we do with this?

Jaime Solorza

On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com 
mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:


http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html

Jaime Solorza

Wireless Systems Architect

915-861-1390 tel:915-861-1390





Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Jason McKemie
And not legal for commercial use I'm sure...

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:

  My take on it is that it is a semi-off-the-shelf way to do broadband
 in the 420-450 MHz band.  Might have twice the foliage-penetrating
 capability of 900 MHz.

 bp
 part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


 On 2/21/2015 9:59 AM, Paul McCall wrote:

  Jaime,



 Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?



 What, exactly, can we do with this?



 Jaime Solorza

 On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html

 Jaime Solorza

 Wireless Systems Architect

 915-861-1390







Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Jaime Solorza
Well if you have a HAM license for this band you can transmit data in the
420 to 450MHz band US or 430 to 450MHz Europe at very high power levels
using 5 and 10MHz channels!!!

They use an approach used by many to up or down convert a frequency from
say 2.4GHz down to 902-928MHz..  eg  .(Shireen, Teletronics, others) using
an external UDC or Ubiquiti's 3.65GHz down converted from 5GHz band
internally.   Old School one was Solectek taking 902.928MHz NCR WaveLAN
signal into a Transverter which gave you three channels at 2.4GHz back in
the 90s.   Most modern RF systems use an IF frequency which is up converted
to desired one.   This is a source of potential interference if not
properly shielded.  simple example is what 100 base LAN connections do to
VHF two way radio stations when they are on same tower.

I was actually playing around Solecteck Transverter the other day...cleaned
it up and going to see if it works.   I only have some  WiLAN 900 MHz
radios to test so I will have to attenuate signal since I can't get into
the settings of these anymore.   I use them to send a signal and adjust my
SAI am surprised they still work


Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Paul McCall pa...@pdmnet.net wrote:

  Jaime,



 Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?



 What, exactly, can we do with this?



 Jaime Solorza

 On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html

 Jaime Solorza

 Wireless Systems Architect

 915-861-1390





Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Paul McCall
Would it be  usable for commercial purposes?

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 1:22 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

Well if you have a HAM license for this band you can transmit data in the 420 
to 450MHz band US or 430 to 450MHz Europe at very high power levels using 5 and 
10MHz channels!!!

They use an approach used by many to up or down convert a frequency from say 
2.4GHz down to 902-928MHz..  eg  .(Shireen, Teletronics, others) using an 
external UDC or Ubiquiti's 3.65GHz down converted from 5GHz band internally.   
Old School one was Solectek taking 902.928MHz NCR WaveLAN signal into a 
Transverter which gave you three channels at 2.4GHz back in the 90s.   Most 
modern RF systems use an IF frequency which is up converted to desired one.   
This is a source of potential interference if not properly shielded.  simple 
example is what 100 base LAN connections do to VHF two way radio stations when 
they are on same tower.

I was actually playing around Solecteck Transverter the other day...cleaned it 
up and going to see if it works.   I only have some  WiLAN 900 MHz radios to 
test so I will have to attenuate signal since I can't get into the settings of 
these anymore.   I use them to send a signal and adjust my SAI am surprised 
they still work


Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Paul McCall 
pa...@pdmnet.netmailto:pa...@pdmnet.net wrote:
Jaime,

Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?

What, exactly, can we do with this?


Jaime Solorza
On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza 
losguyswirel...@gmail.commailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390tel:915-861-1390




Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Jaime Solorza
Well I found it interesting

Jaime Solorza
On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html
 Jaime Solorza
 Wireless Systems Architect
 915-861-1390



Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Philip Rankin
As an old time Ham Operator, it would be pretty cool to operate a data
station at 420MHz using 100 watts or more!  I intend to research it more.
On Feb 21, 2015 10:53 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well I found it interesting

 Jaime Solorza
 On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html
 Jaime Solorza
 Wireless Systems Architect
 915-861-1390




Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Jaime Solorza
speaking of legal.   I hear the Mennonites in Cuahtemoc Chih have their own
long range cordless telephone system using 200=300MHz systems from
Senao/Engenius with 100 ft. towers.  they use as two way radio as well.

Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:

  My take on it is that it is a semi-off-the-shelf way to do broadband
 in the 420-450 MHz band.  Might have twice the foliage-penetrating
 capability of 900 MHz.

 bp
 part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


 On 2/21/2015 9:59 AM, Paul McCall wrote:

  Jaime,



 Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?



 What, exactly, can we do with this?



 Jaime Solorza

 On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html

 Jaime Solorza

 Wireless Systems Architect

 915-861-1390







Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Jaime Solorza
yeppers...I think our military uses something similar in 300MHz band using
Atheros based transceiver and UDC from ???.   I said too much

Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Philip Rankin wireless...@gmail.com
wrote:

 As an old time Ham Operator, it would be pretty cool to operate a data
 station at 420MHz using 100 watts or more!  I intend to research it more.
 On Feb 21, 2015 10:53 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Well I found it interesting

 Jaime Solorza
 On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html
 Jaime Solorza
 Wireless Systems Architect
 915-861-1390




Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread Paul McCall
Jaime,

Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?

What, exactly, can we do with this?


Jaime Solorza
On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza 
losguyswirel...@gmail.commailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390tel:915-861-1390



Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read

2015-02-21 Thread TJ Trout
Show me 100w amp that will work on this? Then you need the same amp on the
customer side. These cards are old news
On Feb 21, 2015 11:04 AM, Philip Rankin wireless...@gmail.com wrote:

 Paul, Absolutely not legal for any commercial purpose and can only be used
 by a licensed amateur radio operator, not the general public in any way!!!
 I doubt that even the Ham operator can even access the general Internet
 with it legally!  But, as a Ham, and as a tinkerer, it would be really
 interesting to see what 100 watts at 420MHz would do through trees at say,
 25 or more miles with a decent tower site.  As an experiment, it might give
 a guy a little more insight into our commercially legal operations that we
 all use today.  And then again, it might just be an exercise in futility!
  :)  I may mess with it some!


 On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Paul McCall pa...@pdmnet.net wrote:

  Would it be  usable for commercial purposes?



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
 *Sent:* Saturday, February 21, 2015 1:22 PM
 *To:* Animal Farm
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read



 Well if you have a HAM license for this band you can transmit data in the
 420 to 450MHz band US or 430 to 450MHz Europe at very high power levels
 using 5 and 10MHz channels!!!



 They use an approach used by many to up or down convert a frequency from
 say 2.4GHz down to 902-928MHz..  eg  .(Shireen, Teletronics, others) using
 an external UDC or Ubiquiti's 3.65GHz down converted from 5GHz band
 internally.   Old School one was Solectek taking 902.928MHz NCR WaveLAN
 signal into a Transverter which gave you three channels at 2.4GHz back in
 the 90s.   Most modern RF systems use an IF frequency which is up converted
 to desired one.   This is a source of potential interference if not
 properly shielded.  simple example is what 100 base LAN connections do to
 VHF two way radio stations when they are on same tower.



 I was actually playing around Solecteck Transverter the other
 day...cleaned it up and going to see if it works.   I only have some  WiLAN
 900 MHz radios to test so I will have to attenuate signal since I can't get
 into the settings of these anymore.   I use them to send a signal and
 adjust my SAI am surprised they still work




   Jaime Solorza

 Wireless Systems Architect

 915-861-1390



 On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Paul McCall pa...@pdmnet.net wrote:

 Jaime,



 Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?



 What, exactly, can we do with this?



 Jaime Solorza

 On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html

 Jaime Solorza

 Wireless Systems Architect

 915-861-1390








 --
 Philip J. Rankin
 Wireless Telecommunications Services
 PO Box 24
 Pittsburg, KS  66762