Re: BUS: Impeachment proceedings for Kenyon
I also support. I would argue that it does satisfy the SHOULD, as by having that office, e has the trust of Agora to publish a report when e is required to, and by not publishing for so long, e has lost that trust (at least for now). On 6/3/2018 6:49 PM, Ned Strange wrote: I support. Probably doesn't satisfy the SHOULD but it's a SHOULD. On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:38 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: I announce intent to impeach Kenyon as Rulekeepor, with 2 Agoran Consent. (removing em from office is nicer than continual blottings). First time this has been used, so here's the Proposal that created the impeachment rule for referemce in case there's some bug in it (proposal 8036 took effect on 28 April 2018): ID: 8036 Title: Impeachment Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Aris Co-authors: Enact a new power 2.0 rule, entitled "Impeachment", with the following text: A player CAN be expelled (impeached) from a specified elected office which e holds with 2 Agoran Consent. When a person is impeached from an office, an election is immediately opened for that office. Players SHOULD NOT use this method of removal unless the officer has abused the powers of eir office or otherwise shown emself unworthy the trust of Agora.
Re: BUS: Impeachment proceedings for Kenyon
I support. Probably doesn't satisfy the SHOULD but it's a SHOULD. On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:38 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I announce intent to impeach Kenyon as Rulekeepor, with 2 Agoran Consent. > (removing em from office is nicer than continual blottings). > > First time this has been used, so here's the Proposal that created the > impeachment rule for referemce in case there's some bug in it > (proposal 8036 took effect on 28 April 2018): > > ID: 8036 > Title: Impeachment > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > > Enact a new power 2.0 rule, entitled "Impeachment", with the following > text: > >A player CAN be expelled (impeached) from a specified elected office > which >e holds with 2 Agoran Consent. When a person is impeached from an > office, >an election is immediately opened for that office. Players SHOULD NOT > use >this method of removal unless the officer has abused the powers of eir >office or otherwise shown emself unworthy the trust of Agora. > > > > -- >From V.J. Rada
BUS: Impeachment proceedings for Kenyon
I announce intent to impeach Kenyon as Rulekeepor, with 2 Agoran Consent. (removing em from office is nicer than continual blottings). First time this has been used, so here's the Proposal that created the impeachment rule for referemce in case there's some bug in it (proposal 8036 took effect on 28 April 2018): ID: 8036 Title: Impeachment Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Aris Co-authors: Enact a new power 2.0 rule, entitled "Impeachment", with the following text: A player CAN be expelled (impeached) from a specified elected office which e holds with 2 Agoran Consent. When a person is impeached from an office, an election is immediately opened for that office. Players SHOULD NOT use this method of removal unless the officer has abused the powers of eir office or otherwise shown emself unworthy the trust of Agora.
