Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Re: BAK: IADoP assumption, elections

2010-07-24 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote:

 On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 I initiate an election to decide the holder of the Ship Computer office. I
 assume the office of Ship Computor.
 
 I CFJ on: Yally is a candidate for Ship Computor.
 
 Arguments: This is another CFJ on ordering of actions.  Both the
 initiation of the election and Yally becoming the holder of the office
 took place at Sun 18 Jul 23:16:02; however, the sentence indicating
 the assumption of the office comes later in the public message than
 the sentence initiating the election.  If Yally was the current
 holder of the office when the election was started, then e
 automatically become a candidate who accepted eir nomination.

Gratuitous:  Multiple actions in the same message occur in the order
they were announced (usually unambiguous, and Yally's message was no
exception).  FALSE.


DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6751-6762

2010-07-24 Thread Ed Murphy
 NUM  C I AI  SUBMITTER   TITLE
 6756 P None 1.0 coppro  Ribbon Sweeper
 6761 P None 2.0 coppro  I Postulate an Assumption

Per Rule 2153, these have a default interest index of 1.


DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Grammar fix

2010-07-24 Thread comex
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
 Proposal:  Grammar fix
 (AI = 1, II = 0, please)

 Amend Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) by replacing where N in
 the Interest Index with where N is the Interest Index.

 I make the above proposal distributable.

Can't you just clean it?


DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6751-6762

2010-07-24 Thread Sean Hunt

On 07/23/2010 01:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:

6761 P None 2.0 coppro  I Postulate an Assumption
AGAINST [just make it flip to Assumed when a player assumes an office, I say]


what


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6751-6762

2010-07-24 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 22:39, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 07/23/2010 01:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:

 6761 P None 2.0 coppro              I Postulate an Assumption
 AGAINST [just make it flip to Assumed when a player assumes an office, I
 say]

 what

That doesn't make sense. Sorry.