Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Decriminalizing Lateness

2022-05-07 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion


On 5/7/2022 3:50 PM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/7/22 16:57, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I agree with moving to something like this in principle, but I think that
>> the metric needs work.
>>
>>   - you can clear your name by resigning and re-deputizing for the office;
> 
> FWIW if someone did do this they'd then have to do their job well 
> afterwards for it to stick and doing that would be somewhat conspicuous, 
> so it doesn't seem like a big issue?

I'm basing this on the fact that officers did it so often to get a Cyan
ribbon (without the conspicuousness costing them anything) that we
modified Cyan.  I suspect, like Cyan, it's something we'd say when it
happened "well that's allowed but undesirable so we should fix it
systemically, not impeach or anything."  Just trying to save introducing
something we'd want to fix?

-G.



Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Decriminalizing Lateness

2022-05-07 Thread nix via agora-discussion

On 5/7/22 16:57, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:

I agree with moving to something like this in principle, but I think that
the metric needs work.

  - you can clear your name by resigning and re-deputizing for the office;


FWIW if someone did do this they'd then have to do their job well 
afterwards for it to stick and doing that would be somewhat conspicuous, 
so it doesn't seem like a big issue?




  - there's no notion of forgiving the past without resigning in this
manner;

  - as time goes on in an office, each missed report contributes less %, so
it means the longer you hold the office the less the % matters and the
less you might care (I have learned this point playing Wordle lol).



These both seem like good arguments to perhaps reset it on a time-frame. 
Quarterly would match with what we've done for blots before.



Overall this seems opposite of what we'd want a metric to do - which would
be to go lower if you missed a present/recent report, but forgive the more
distant past.  So I'm concerned this incentivizes what we don't want?

-G.



--
nix
Herald, Collector


DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Decriminalizing Lateness

2022-05-07 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion


On 5/7/2022 1:02 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> Amend R2138 "The Associate Director of Personnel" by appending:
> 
>  4. For filled offices, the percent of reports that have been
> published in a timely fashion since either this clause was added
> to the rules or the last change in officeholder for the office,
> whichever is more recent.

I agree with moving to something like this in principle, but I think that
the metric needs work.

 - you can clear your name by resigning and re-deputizing for the office;

 - there's no notion of forgiving the past without resigning in this
   manner;

 - as time goes on in an office, each missed report contributes less %, so
   it means the longer you hold the office the less the % matters and the
   less you might care (I have learned this point playing Wordle lol).

Overall this seems opposite of what we'd want a metric to do - which would
be to go lower if you missed a present/recent report, but forgive the more
distant past.  So I'm concerned this incentivizes what we don't want?

-G.



DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Decriminalizing Lateness

2022-05-07 Thread nix via agora-discussion
Note that this doesn't *actually* decriminalize it since all SHALL 
violations are criminalized. But it does help prepare larger changes, 
and discourage specifically targeting it.


--
nix
Herald, Collector


Re: DIS: Parting Gifts, Part 2 of 2: Silver Quill Nominations

2022-05-07 Thread nix via agora-discussion
On 5/1/22 22:01, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> It's interesting that most of the recent gameplay hasn't been a
> consequence of new rules, though, but of changing behaviour by Agorans.
> (For example, Blots went from being mostly irrelevant to being highly
> relevant, and yet the rules surrounding that didn't really change at
> all.)

I think it might've been a delayed effect of rule changes. When
Competitive Finger-Pointing was introduced our behavior around
finger-pointing didn't change much, but players that have registered
since then have been a lot more strict on it. It's possible this is
because competitive finger-pointing implies a very cutthroat usage of
blots that wasn't part of our playstyle before it.

--
nix
Herald, Collector