Re: DIS: Re: Intent to register
Yep you did just fine, welcoming is fast and loose; I just recommended players grant themselves welcome packages to have them use various rules from the get go. It didn't have to go to Agora business even :) On Sun, Jan 28, 2024, 3:28 PM Agora amdw42 via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > Welcome! > I recommend that you grant yourself a welcome package (that's effectively a > stamp of your own type!) > > Also this is my first time welcoming someone so if I’ve done something > wrong someone please let me know! > > — > Ben > > —— > Ben > > From: agora-business on behalf of > Maria Carmela Del Gaudio via agora-business > > Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2024 6:24:36 PM > To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org > Cc: Maria Carmela Del Gaudio > Subject: BUS: Intent to register > > Hello, > I would like to register, my preferred name is mcdg. > Many thanks. >
DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to register
On 1/28/24 17:24, Maria Carmela Del Gaudio via agora-business wrote: > Hello, > I would like to register, my preferred name is mcdg. > Many thanks. Welcome! By the way, for all new players (or anyone that wants a refresher?), I've been working on a new beginner's guide. You can see the rough draft here: https://gist.github.com/nixnull/7926bf2363d9076af6605c10d3eced02 I hope it's useful, and I would love any feedback to make it better! -- nix
DIS: Re: Intent to register
Welcome! I recommend that you grant yourself a welcome package (that's effectively a stamp of your own type!) Also this is my first time welcoming someone so if I’ve done something wrong someone please let me know! — Ben —— Ben From: agora-business on behalf of Maria Carmela Del Gaudio via agora-business Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2024 6:24:36 PM To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org Cc: Maria Carmela Del Gaudio Subject: BUS: Intent to register Hello, I would like to register, my preferred name is mcdg. Many thanks.
DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Birthday Announcement
juan wrote: The 27th of October of 2023 is Murphy's 16th Agoran Birthday! Actually that was my third registration; I confirm that the following registrations were also me: (v) Murphy (< 1996-01-23--2007-09-24) (d) Murphy (2007-10-27--2017-11-17) Proto: The day(s) on which a player re-registered are eir Unbirthday(s).
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Vacations
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 2:10 PM nix via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 1/28/24 14:04, nix via agora-business wrote: > > A player CAN flip the Delegate switch of a specified office to > > emself with Agoran Consent. If the Delegate switch of an office is > > set to "None", the holder of that office CAN flip the Delegate > > switch of that office to a specified player with notice. > > > I reread the discussion from when this was first proposed (in May of > last year!). Back then, the concern was striking a balance between > insuring someone would fill the role, not creating "dynasties" where the > current holder chose their successor, and making this all timely so it > wasn't a hassle. I hope this method is a good balance. The officer can > just choose someone if there is nobody, but a simple Consent decision > can always assign someone. If people don't agree with the officer's > choice, it's over-rideable. > > -- > nix > I think there needs to be some kind of change so that an unwilling delegate stop being one. As is, someone else would have to volunteer, since you can only make the delegate *yourself* with Agoran consent. I don't like that someone with a bunch of offices could burden someone else with all the office work for 30 days, who'd be forced to go inactive if they can't comply or can't get someone else to volunteer. Also what would happen if a delegate "resigns"? I think it'd be a good idea to have it be defined, and could fix this issue. Maybe throw in a clause about deputizing when there's no delegate and an officer is on vacation, the deputizer becomes the new delegate. -- snail
DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Vacations
On 1/28/24 14:04, nix via agora-business wrote: > A player CAN flip the Delegate switch of a specified office to > emself with Agoran Consent. If the Delegate switch of an office is > set to "None", the holder of that office CAN flip the Delegate > switch of that office to a specified player with notice. I reread the discussion from when this was first proposed (in May of last year!). Back then, the concern was striking a balance between insuring someone would fill the role, not creating "dynasties" where the current holder chose their successor, and making this all timely so it wasn't a hassle. I hope this method is a good balance. The officer can just choose someone if there is nobody, but a simple Consent decision can always assign someone. If people don't agree with the officer's choice, it's over-rideable. -- nix
