Re: DIS: (Idea) agoran science pt 2
On 6/4/24 22:00, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > This one I know has been done but I still like it and so maybe we can > illuminate why it went bye bye? Are you referring to honor? Or something else? > What about an office that tracks seals (of approval) or like favors?. They > each increase voting power by one on a referenda, but you can only use 1 of > players' seal per referenda. You can give like 1 a week or something. > Mainly would incentive the use of contracts again I think? Since buying > votes seems hard in the current contract scape, this would incentive custom > contracts, like the bounty one, or maybe you just want players to give u > stamps? I guess it would cheaper stamps Interesting idea. Would have to find the sweet spot for enough voting power to be worthwhile but not too much voting power. > Maybe stamps just need to have voting power associated > Maybe I just need to be the change I Vanna see in ze would... hmm okie > maybe I shouldn't be Agora for now but I'll look back on this fondly Personally I'd rather this be separate from stamps, like your above idea. -- nix Arbitor, Spendor
Re: DIS: (Idea) agoran science pt 2
On 6/4/24 21:53, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > assigned to an inquiry based on a social agreement, which, the bounty can > only be granted by fulfilling that agreement? > > EG bounty is "what would valid non-numerical assets look like in Agora?" > It goes to auction: and the prizes are nominated and voted on. Then it's > available for hunting. > > A hunt could look like "hey here's a new thesis" "here's some historical > records" "that's impossible due to these judgements" or anything else. > Then, the time comes to vote on the best answer, which wins the bounty > prize. > > IDK maybe I'm just having more fever dreams lololol. Just trying to get > more interest in this stuff This seems kind of interesting. -- nix Arbitor, Spendor
Re: DIS: (Idea) agoran science pt 2
Ok part 2 of pt 2 This one I know has been done but I still like it and so maybe we can illuminate why it went bye bye? What about an office that tracks seals (of approval) or like favors?. They each increase voting power by one on a referenda, but you can only use 1 of players' seal per referenda. You can give like 1 a week or something. Mainly would incentive the use of contracts again I think? Since buying votes seems hard in the current contract scape, this would incentive custom contracts, like the bounty one, or maybe you just want players to give u stamps? I guess it would cheaper stamps Maybe stamps just need to have voting power associated Maybe I just need to be the change I Vanna see in ze would... hmm okie maybe I shouldn't be Agora for now but I'll look back on this fondly On Tue, Jun 4, 2024, 7:54 PM 4st nomic via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > What if there was an office that accepted inquiries, then, a bounty is > assigned to an inquiry based on a social agreement, which, the bounty can > only be granted by fulfilling that agreement? > > EG bounty is "what would valid non-numerical assets look like in Agora?" > It goes to auction: and the prizes are nominated and voted on. Then it's > available for hunting. > > A hunt could look like "hey here's a new thesis" "here's some historical > records" "that's impossible due to these judgements" or anything else. > Then, the time comes to vote on the best answer, which wins the bounty > prize. > > IDK maybe I'm just having more fever dreams lololol. Just trying to get > more interest in this stuff >
DIS: (Idea) agoran science pt 2
What if there was an office that accepted inquiries, then, a bounty is assigned to an inquiry based on a social agreement, which, the bounty can only be granted by fulfilling that agreement? EG bounty is "what would valid non-numerical assets look like in Agora?" It goes to auction: and the prizes are nominated and voted on. Then it's available for hunting. A hunt could look like "hey here's a new thesis" "here's some historical records" "that's impossible due to these judgements" or anything else. Then, the time comes to vote on the best answer, which wins the bounty prize. IDK maybe I'm just having more fever dreams lololol. Just trying to get more interest in this stuff
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Stonemason] Billboard Rock Chart - 3 June 2024 (Corrected)
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 9:58 PM 4st nomic via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 3:47 PM Jaff via agora-official < > agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > THE BILLBOARD ROCK CHART (STONEMASON'S WEEKLY REPORT) > > > > StoneOwnerLast Wielded Stone Cost Immune? > > --- --- -- --- > > PowerNix 2024-04-01 5 > > Soul snail2024-04-21 5 > > Sabotage Agora2023-10-25 6 > > MintyMatt Smyth 2024-04-28 7 > > Protection Nix 2024-04-01 3 Protection > > RecursionNix 2024-04-01 5 Protection > > Hot Potato Agora2024-04-28 5 > > BlankAgora2024-04-01 2 > > Anti-Equatorial Agora2024-05-05 2 > > Radiance snail2024-05-06 8 > > Loud Agora 5 > > > > CoE: At least one stone cost is incorrect: The Minty stone was transferred > last week to Juniper via the Soul Stone, setting it's cost to the default, > and then this week, the Minty Stone should now have cost 9. (Or... am I > missing something?) > (And the Soul stone was also transferred as part of its ability) > > -- > 4ˢᵗ > wearing Jester's Cap > Uncertified Bad Idea Generator > Stone cost only changes at the end of the week, decreasing by 1 if it wasnt transferred, or increasing by 1 if it was transferred at least twice. The minty stone cost 7 last week and was transferred twice, so it should cost 8 spendies now. (So you're both mistaken :3) -- snail
