Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deprioritize History
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Again, the proposal doesn't eliminate the history, it only moves it from monthly to weekly. It's not pertinent and it really isn't changing that much. Personally I'd rather not see offices have both a weekly and monthly report for not good reason. The only ones I see needing such a structure are Notary and Rulekeepor.
DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deprioritize History
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Proposal: Deprioritize History (AI = 1, II = 1) I pledge to attempt to become Registrar as soon as possible after the next time I register. Again, the proposal doesn't eliminate the history, it only moves it from monthly to weekly. It's not pertinent and it really isn't changing that much.
DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deprioritize History
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: Proposal: Deprioritize History (AI = 1, II = 1) Anyone have a No Confidence card (and why do I always have an overwhelming desire to have one when Yally holds an office? If elected as Registrar I will maintain this record regardless). -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deprioritize History
The proposal would just move it to a monthly report, you realize... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: Proposal: Deprioritize History (AI = 1, II = 1) Anyone have a No Confidence card (and why do I always have an overwhelming desire to have one when Yally holds an office? If elected as Registrar I will maintain this record regardless). -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deprioritize History
Oh I do apologize Yally... wasn't the Registrar's report monthly for a while anyway? Did it move back to weekly on purpose, or accidentally with the various priority changes (at least a year or two ago, the full history was in fact only reported monthly IIRC). I'd give you a prop from me but I did one this week already. -G. On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, comex wrote: The proposal would just move it to a monthly report, you realize... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: Proposal: Deprioritize History (AI = 1, II = 1) Anyone have a No Confidence card (and why do I always have an overwhelming desire to have one when Yally holds an office? If elected as Registrar I will maintain this record regardless). -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deprioritize History
Oh I do apologize Yally... wasn't the Registrar's report monthly for a while anyway? Did it move back to weekly on purpose, or accidentally with the various priority changes (at least a year or two ago, the full history was in fact only reported monthly IIRC). -G. On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, comex wrote: The proposal would just move it to a monthly report, you realize... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: Proposal: Deprioritize History (AI = 1, II = 1) Anyone have a No Confidence card (and why do I always have an overwhelming desire to have one when Yally holds an office? If elected as Registrar I will maintain this record regardless). -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deprioritize History
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Oh I do apologize Yally... wasn't the Registrar's report monthly for a while anyway? Did it move back to weekly on purpose, or accidentally with the various priority changes (at least a year or two ago, the full history was in fact only reported monthly IIRC). I'd give you a prop from me but I did one this week already. -G. When I registered (in February), there was no requirement for the Registrar to track history. It was only done by tradition. Since then a requirement has been added and it has always been a part of the Registrar's weekly report.
